Abstract
Imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and treatment of distal radius fractures. Conventional radiography in 2 planes is still considered first choice imaging for wrist injuries. Image quality and a systematic diagnostic approach are however essential. Computer tomography (CT) is indicated in cases of uncertain radiograph findings and in comminuted, complex or intra-articular fractures and occasionally for presurgery assessment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful in the assessment of tissue lesions and radiograph negative fracture suspicions. Ultrasound is not considered routine modality in radius fracture diagnosis; however, it can be considered by an experienced examiner.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Summary
Imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and treatment of distal radius fractures. Conventional radiography in 2 planes is still considered first choice imaging for wrist injuries. Image quality and a systematic diagnostic approach are however essential. Computer tomography (CT) is indicated in cases of uncertain radiograph findings and in comminuted, complex or intra-articular fractures and occasionally for presurgery assessment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful in assessment of tissue lesions and suspicion of fracture despite normal radiograph. Ultrasound is not considered routine modality in radius fracture diagnosis.
2 Introduction
Wrist traumas are amongst the most common injuries in the emergency department with fracture of the distal radius reported to be the most common upper extremity fracture (Larsen and Lauritsen 1993). There are few prospective, randomized trials to support different diagnostic strategies. Since wrist injuries are often complex comprising not only fractures but also a continuum of soft-tissue damages, great demands are put on a judicious imaging strategy, ensuring they are developed in close cooperation between the clinician and the radiologist (Fig. 9.1). This strategy should include immediate as well as possible follow-up imaging. Conventional radiography in at least 2 planes is still considered first choice imaging. In cases of uncertain radiograph findings, comminuted, displaced or intra-articular fractures or for presurgery assessment, computer tomography (CT) is the modality of choice (Trumble et al. 1999; Arora et al. 2010; Harness et al. 2006). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful in the assessment of soft-tissue lesions and fracture suspicion despite negative radiograph (Goldfarb et al. 2011; Metz and Gilula 1993; Larsen et al. 1993). Ultrasound is not routine modality; however, it can be considered in an austere environment (McNeil et al. 2009) (Fig. 9.1).
3 Conventional Radiography
Wrist radiographs, which include the distal radius, distal ulna, carpal bones and metacarpal bases, can be a challenge. The 15 bones have subtle relationships that change with wrist positioning, which is why the adequacy of the radiograph is of utmost importance. The standard wrist series includes a posterior-anterior (PA – with shoulder in 90° abduction and elbow in 90° flexion) (Fig. 9.2) and lateral view (Fig. 9.3); more views can be added (Goldfarb et al. 2011).
A meticulous 3-step approach to radiograph interpretation can be taken.
-
First: Check the adequacy of the radiograph, the alignment and angles of the bones and the bone shapes (Table 9.1).
-
Second: Carefully evaluate and describe the radiograph systematically. Distal radial fractures are normally not difficult to identify but since they often are accompanied by soft tissue injuries resulting in dislocations of carpal bones, careful examination of all the structures in the wrist is necessary (Spence et al. 1998; Geissler et al. 1996) (see Table 9.2). Examples of fractures are displayed in Fig. 9.7 .
-
Third: Diagnose and decide treatment. The classification of fractures is described elsewhere in this book. Table 9.3 displays how injuries are best viewed and Fig. 9.7 displays examples.
4 Computer Tomography (CT) Scanning
As mentioned, conventional radiography is usually sufficient for correct diagnosis and adequate treatment of distal radius fractures. CT scans provide more accurate information regarding the anatomy of intra-articular fractures than radiography, and 70–81 % distal radius fractures have been reported to have intra-articular extension. Healing with residual incongruity of 2 mm or more carry a risk of almost 100 % of developing secondary radiographic visible osteoarthritis. The addition of CT to plain films frequently changes the therapeutic recommendations for such cases, and CT is also valuable in case of comminute fractures and before surgery (Trumble et al. 1999; Arora et al. 2010; Harness et al. 2006; Slutsky 2013).
A CT scanner emits a series of narrow beams through an arc moving spirally 360° around the body. A 64-slice CT scanner has 64 rows of 0.625 mm slices giving a 40 mm detector width, which transmits the collected data to a computer, from which 2D and 3D images in high resolution are reconstructed. The patient is placed supine with the arm stretched over the head and the wrist angled a little to the central beam to avoid artefacts (Fig. 9.8). CT scan examples are displayed in Figs. 9.9 and 9.10.
Promising results regarding demonstration of instability between the carpal bones have been shown using dynamic CT scans; however, more studies are needed (Kalia et al. 2009; Leng et al. 2011).
5 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
MRI is the modality of choice for visualization of soft-tissue injuries and hidden fractures of the wrist (Fotiadou et al. 2011). The MRI technique is entirely different from conventional radiography and CT scanning, not creating images based upon high-energy electromagnetic waves (X-rays), but upon magnetic and radio waves. The patient lies inside a large, cylinder-shaped magnet, the strength of which is measured in tesla, which is 10,000–30,000 times stronger than the magnetic field of the earth. This strong magnetic field causes alignment of the positively charged body hydrogen protons, themselves acting like small magnets. Radio waves are then sent through the body causing disturbance of this alignment. When the waves are switched off again, the hydrogen protons spin back to their original aligned position, projecting radio waves of their own. The scanner receives these signals, and a computer turns them into pictures in axial, coronal and sagittal planes. Since the signals are tiny, the wrist is placed in a coil (antenna). By changing the timing of the radio wave pulses, it is possible to gain information about the different types of tissue. Since movable hydrogen protons are mainly found in fat, water and soft tissue, these structures will project the strongest signals, which appear white on the MRI picture. Low signals, such as calcified bones, appear dark. Depending on when the radio waves are turned off, different signals, the so-called sequences, are developed.
It can now be understood why MRI is of benefit in cases of suspected concomitant ligamentous injuries or fractures not demonstrated on routine radiographs, since the MRI will visualize soft tissue and oedema. The ligamentous elements are important for the stabilization of the wrist. They dictate much of the injury pattern and account for many missed wrist injuries seen in association with distal radius fractures (Larsen et al. 1993). It has been reported that 68 % of patients requiring operative repair of a radius fracture had injuries to the soft tissues, including the triangular fibrocartilage complex and the scapholunate or the lunate-triquetral ligaments (Geissler et al. 1996). Arthrography is valuable when looking for such defects (Goldfarb et al. 2011). MRI is also valuable for follow-up in case of persistent discomfort after injury (Fotiadou et al. 2011).
The MRI is considered harmless to the patient as opposed to conventional radiographs and CT scans; however, they are costly, time consuming and challenging for patients suffering from claustrophobia. The cost-benefit of additional MRI is still under debate (Nikken et al. 2005).
The sequences used for imaging of the wrist are called T1, T2, STIR (short tau inversion recovery) and T2 with fat suppression, and opposed to CT, reconstruction is not possible; the sequences have to be chosen before the examination. Table 9.4 illustrates which types of tissue give high and low signals in the different sequences. For strengths and weaknesses of the different sequences, see Table 9.5. Examples of soft-tissue injuries are displayed in Fig. 9.11.
6 Ultrasound
Ultrasound is not considered to be routine modality in the diagnosis of wrist injuries. It has been shown that the use of ultrasound by an experienced clinician in an austere environment can be performed accurately and may possibly prevent unnecessary evacuations for suspected fractures requiring radiographic verification (McNeil et al. 2009).
References
Arora S, Grover SB, Batra S, Sharma VK. Comparative evaluation of postreduction intra-articular distal radial fractures by radiographs and multidetector computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(15):2523–32.
Fotiadou A, Patel A, Morgan T, Karantanas AH. Wrist injuries in young adults: the diagnostic impact of CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(2):235–9.
Geissler WB, Freeland AE, Savoie FH, McIntyre LW, Whipple TL. Intracarpal soft-tissue lesions associated with an intra-articular fracture of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(3):357–65.
Goldfarb CA, Yin Y, Louis AG, Fisher AJ, Boyer MI. Wrist fractures: what the clinician wants to know. Radiology. 2011;219:11–28.
Harness NG, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Harris GJ, Jupiter JB. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions on the characterization and treatment of distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(6):1315–23.
Kalia V, Obray RW, Filice R, Fayad LM, Murphy K, Carrino JA. Functional joint imaging using 256-MDCT: technical feasibility. Am J Radiol. 2009;192(6):w295–9.
Larsen CF, Lauritsen J. Epidemiology of acute wrist trauma. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22(5):911–6.
Larsen CF, Brondum V, Wienholtz G. An algorithm for acute wrist trauma. A systematic approach to diagnosis. J Hand Surg Br. 1993;18(2):207–12.
Leng S, Zhao K, Qu M, An K, Berger RA, McCollough CH. Dynamic CT technique for assessment of wrist joint instabilities. Med Phys. 2011;38(7):50–6.
McNeil CR, McManus J, Mehta S. The accuracy of portable ultrasonography to diagnose fractures in austere environment. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:50–2.
Metz VM, Gilula LA. Imaging techniques for distal radius fractures and related injuries. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24(2):217–28.
Nikken JJ, Oei EH, Ginai AZ, Krestin GP, Verhaar JA, van Vugt AB, et al. Acute peripheral joint injury: cost and effectiveness of low-field-strength MR imaging–results of randomized controlled trial. Radiology. 2005;236(3):958–67.
Slutsky D. Predicting the outcome of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2013;21(2005):289–94.
Spence LD, Savenor A, Nwachuku I, Tilsley J, Eustace S. MRI of fractures of the distal radius: comparison with conventional radiographs. Skeletal Radiol. 1998;27(5):244–9.
Trumble TE, Culp RW, Hanel DP, Geissler WB, Berger RA. Intra-articular fractures of the distal aspect of the radius. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:465–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lange, B., Dirksen, KL.B. (2014). Imaging. In: Hove, L., Lindau, T., Hølmer, P. (eds) Distal Radius Fractures. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54604-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54604-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54603-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54604-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)