Abstract
Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) may occur exclusively in the CNS (primary CNS lymphoma, PCNSL) or as a secondary involvement of a systemic lymphoma (secondary CNS lymphoma, SCNSL). The incidence of these lymphomas is still low, but an increasing incidence, particularly in older patients, has been reported in last decades. The pathophysiologic basis for development of lymphoma in the CNS, lacking a lymphatic system, is still a subject of debate. The course of CNSL is usually very aggressive and the prognosis worse compared to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma involving other extranodal sites and organs. Therapeutic management has to account for the particular pharmacokinetics of the CNS. High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is the most active agent and should be considered backbone of therapy; however, the optimal management of CNSL has not been fully established. For long-term survivors, late neurotoxicity is an important issue, particularly when whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was performed. Whenever possible, patients with CNS involvement of lymphoma should be included in clinical trials.
Pathology: German Ott and Eric D. Hsi
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Overall Survival
- Complete Remission Rate
- Central Nervous System Lymphoma
- Meningeal Involvement
- Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Pathology
The great majority of primary PCNSL lymphomas (90 %) are diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL), and in a recent series, all 75 cases of PCNSL were DLBCL (Gerstner and Batchelor 2010; Preusser et al. 2010). The other 10 % of cases are composed of rare occurrences of intravascular lymphomas, Burkitt lymphomas, and rare examples of peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Low-grade B-cell lymphomas such as lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma are extremely rare and seem to have a better prognosis (Figs. 11.1 and 11.2) (Jahnke et al. 2006a). MALT-type lymphomas typically involve the dura, mimicking meningioma, and are thought to arise from this structure but demonstrate features similar to MALT lymphomas at other sites (Tu et al. 2005). Rare cases have been reported in the brain parenchyma or ventricles (Kelley et al. 2005) (Fig. 11.3). Their pathologic features are similar to non-CNS sites; however, their detailed histopathologic features are not well characterized. A perivascular pattern is seen in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (Fig. 11.2), but many reported cases may not be primary PCNSL (Ly et al. 2011). Further discussion will be confined to the pathologic features of PCNSL DLBCL.
In PCNSL, many biopsies are now stereotactic biopsies and thus only a small amount of tissue is available for diagnosis. Although architecture is therefore limited, most cases will show a diffuse growth pattern consisting of intermediate-to-large cells with vesicular chromatin. A centroblastic appearance is most common with an immunoblastic appearance being seen in less than 10 % of cases (Preusser et al. 2010). Immunoblastic morphology is more frequently seen in the setting of HIV infection. Rare cases may demonstrate plasmablastic features (Urrego et al. 2011). Necrosis is often present and when vessels are represented, a propensity for tumor cells to be present in a perivascular location can be seen (Fig. 11.4) (Preusser et al. 2010).
Secondary CNS involvement is extremely rare in indolent lymphomas. It is observed in up to 6 % of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas and is more frequent in Burkitt lymphoma and lymphoblastic lymphoma (Herrlinger et al. 2009).
1.1 Immunophenotype
PCNS DLBCL expresses pan-B-cell antigens such as CD19 and CD20 as well as monotypic surface immunoglobulin light chains. CD10 is expressed in only a minority (<10 %) of cases, BCL6 in 60–80 %, and IRF4/MUM1 in 90 % (Preusser et al. 2010). Thus, a non-germinal B-cell phenotype is diagnosed in most cases (Fig. 11.5) (Preusser et al. 2010; Hattab et al. 2010; Hans et al. 2004). HLA molecules are often absent and likely related to genetic loss of the HLA locus at chromosome 6p21.3 (Booman et al. 2006; Riemersma et al. 2000). BCL6 expression has been found to be of prognostic relevance (favorable) in more than one study (Preusser et al. 2010; Braaten et al. 2003; Levy et al. 2008; Lin et al. 2006; Song et al. 2011), but others have found the opposite in the setting of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and radiation (Momota et al. 2010).
1.2 Genetics
Relatively little is known about the molecular genetics of PCNSL DLBCL, due to its rarity and lack of adequate tissue for such studies. Montesinos-Rongen et al. demonstrated that these tumors often show somatic hypermutation of the rearranged immunoglobulin genes and preferential use of the VH4-34 gene segment (Montesinos-Rongen et al. 1999). Del(6q)(q22) and BCL6 translocation (usually partnered with IGH@) were reported in 45 and 17 % of cases, respectively, and appear to be associated with inferior survival in the setting of HDMTX therapy, whereas MYC translocations were found in 3 % of cases (Cady et al. 2008). EBV is usually absent in immunocompetent patients but is often present in cases involving immunocompromised patients (Preusser et al. 2010; Cavaliere et al. 2010; Knowles 2003). Gene expression studies have reported high-level expression of regulators of the unfolded protein response signaling pathway, MYC, and PIM1 and have identified a potential role for IL-4/STAT6 signaling (Rubenstein et al. 2006). Pathway analysis revealed that PCNSL, as compared to non-CNS DLBCL, is characterized by differential expression of multiple extracellular matrix (ECM) and adhesion-related pathways. The most significantly upregulated gene was the ECM-related osteopontin (SPP1) (Tun et al. 2008). Differential expression of microRNAs (mRNAs) has been found between nodal and CNS DLBL (Fischer et al. 2011a). MiRNAs associated with the MYC pathway (miR-17-5p, miR-20a, miR-9), with blocking of terminal B-cell differentiation (miR-9, miR-30b/c), or with upregulation by inflammatory cytokines (miR-155) were upregulated in PCNSL, whereas the potential tumor suppressor MiRNAs such as miR-199a, miR-214, miR-193b, and miR-145 were downregulated. Prompted by findings in nodal DLBCL related to potential activation of the NFκB pathway, activating mutations in CARD11 and inactivating mutation of TNFAIP3 have been studied, and mutations in the former have been found in approximately 10 % of cases while mutations in the latter are uncommon (Montesinos-Rongen et al. 2010; Rubenstein et al. 2013).
2 Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of CNSL includes inflammatory conditions such as sarcoidosis, cerebral vasculitis, or multiple sclerosis plaques but also infections such as tuberculoma or toxoplasmosis, particularly in immunosuppressed patients. Rare cases of DLBCL may present with lymphoma cells entirely within vessels, and these cases are best classified as intravascular large B-cell lymphoma. This uncommon variant of extranodal large B-cell lymphomas may occur in the CNS (Yegappan et al. 2001). Non-hematopoietic round cell neoplasms such as primitive neuroectodermal tumors, poorly differentiated or neuroendocrine carcinomas, melanoma, and primary brain tumors such as oligodendrogliomas can mimic lymphomas but are easily distinguished with immunohistochemistry. These tumors will all lack pan B-cell markers such as CD20 and CD79a.
3 Pathogenesis
A proposed mechanism for CNS tropism of the malignant B cell in PCNSL is one in which a clone of malignant B cells is selected via the upregulation of specific adhesion molecule(s) that facilitate homing to the CNS, and secondarily, the tumor cells proliferate and undergo secondary mutations in the absence of regulatory control by the immune system. In support of this is the demonstration that subclinical tumor-related clones are detectable in the blood and bone marrow of PCNSL patients, suggesting that the CNS microenvironment might promote a more aggressive phenotype (McCann et al. 2009; Jahnke et al. 2006b). However, to date, no differences in the expression of adhesion molecules have been identified between PCNSL and systemic lymphomas. Recently, CXCL13 (BCA-1), a B-cell-attracting chemokine, was determined to be expressed at significant levels in PCNSL tumors. Notably, CXCL13 is expressed in Helicobacter pylori-induced mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue as well as in gastric lymphoma (Mazzucchelli et al. 1999). Similarly, expression of the chemokine stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) has also been demonstrated by malignant B cells in PCNSL. Ectopic expression of these chemokines within the intraocular compartment and brain may contribute to lymphoma cell homing to the retina and CNS microenvironments (Smith et al. 2007; Fischer et al. 2009a).
4 Risk Factors
4.1 Risk Factors for PCNSL
Immunodeficiency is the only identified risk factor for development of PCNSL. However, PCNSL became very rare in HIV-infected persons since the introduction of HAART, reflecting the important role of immune system in the development of this disease.
4.2 Risk Factors for SCNSL
There is still a concern about the definition of risk group for CNS relapse in systemic lymphoma, since no study has been able to properly address this question. The existing risk models are based on clinical characteristics and have a low specificity and sensitivity implying a potential overtreatment in up to 70 % of patients deemed at high risk.
Current practice for prophylaxis varies widely, with involvement of particular sites such as paranasal sinuses, testes, orbital cavity, and bone marrow triggering prophylaxis at most centers. In the largest series of 1,693 elderly patients, a 6-year probability of CNS relapse tenfold higher was found for patients with testicular, orbit, and paranasal sinuses involvement as compared to other patients. Patients with testicular involvement had a 6-year probability of CNS relapse of 22.1 vs. 2.1 % in patients without testicular involvement (p < 0.001). The probability of CNS failure at 6 years for patients with or without orbit and paranasal sinuses involvement was 33 % vs. 2 % (p = 0.02) and 26 % vs. 2 % (p > 0.001), respectively (Boehme et al. 2007).
Recently, a risk model was proposed based on an analysis of 1,222 elderly patients with DLBCL treated with CHOP without or with rituximab (R-CHOP). The group with involvement of more than one extranodal site, elevated LDH, and low ECOG performance status (4.8 % of patients treated with R-CHOP) showed a probability for CNS events at 2 years of 33.5 % as compared with 2.8 % in other patients given R-CHOP (Boehme et al. 2009).
New approaches to identify patients with systemic lymphoma at risk who should receive CNS prophylaxis are needed.
5 Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Procedures
5.1 Symptoms of CNS Lymphoma
PCNSL most frequently presents with cognitive dysfunction, psychomotor slowing, disorientation and neurological focal symptoms, whereas cranial nerve palsies, seizures, cerebellar symptoms, and symptoms of elevated intracranial pressure are less frequent (<20 %). In patients with ocular involvement (see below), blurred vision and floaters are the most common symptoms.
SCNSL occurs after a median time of 6 months after first lymphoma diagnosis (Herrlinger et al. 2009). It may present as brain parenchyma lesions (approx. 40–80 %) with symptoms similar to those in PCNSL or as meningeal involvement. In most recent publications, 20–40 % of patients had simultaneous systemic disease (Boehme et al. 2007; Schmitz et al. 2012; Villa et al. 2010).
5.2 Diagnostic Procedures
Cranial MRI with contrast enhancement is the method of choice for further diagnostics and usually shows intense and homogenously enhancing lesions without necrosis and with a relatively small edema, typically localized in the periventricular space (Küker et al. 2005) (Fig. 11.6). PCNSL most often presents as a solitary lesion, but multiple lesions may be detected in up to a third of the patients. Sometimes, contrast enhancement of the meninges indicating meningeal involvement can be seen (Fig. 11.6).
Diagnostic evaluation focusses on the establishment of the baseline extent of the disease and the exclusion of systemic lymphoma. According to the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) (Abrey et al. 2005), staging examinations should include physical examination with palpation for enlarged lymph nodes as well as testicular examination in males; computed tomography of the neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis; and bone marrow biopsy. Also, blood tests for HIV, complete blood cell count, basic metabolic profile, and lactate dehydrogenase level are recommended. Testicular ultrasonography should be considered in elderly males. Additionally, ophthalmologic examination and lumbar puncture (for cell count, protein and glucose measurement, cytology, and, facultatively, for flow cytometry studies and immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene rearrangement) should be performed.
Making the diagnosis from the CSF is usually not possible since meningeal involvement can be found only in a minority of patients. Even using PCR for immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene rearrangement in addition to conventional CSF cytomorphology and MRI concurrent leptomeningeal involvement was seen in about 15 % of patients (Korfel et al. 2012) (Fig. 11.7). In systemic lymphoma, flow cytometry was reported to increase the diagnostic yield of cytologic examination of CSF alone from approximately 13 to 23 % (Schroers et al. 2010a; Collie and Hsi 2013). In the future, CSF multicolor flow cytometry as well as new CSF parameters such as free immunoglobulin light chains, miRNAs, or CXCL13 may become useful tools as noninvasive biomarker for the diagnosis of CNSL (Schroers et al. 2010b; Sancho et al. 2010; Baraniskin et al. 2011; Fischer et al. 2009b).
In the setting of HIV infection, examination of the CSF for EBV has been used to aid in the diagnosis of PCNSL in patients with suggestive radiographic findings without tissue biopsy (Ambinder et al. 2010; Cinque et al. 1993; De Luca et al. 1995).
Ocular involvement (retina, optic nerve, vitreous) is diagnosed in approx. 15 % of patients (Fig. 11.8) and may develop before, concurrent with, and after brain parenchyma manifestations. Typical clinical findings include vitreous cellular infiltration (lymphoma and inflammatory cells) and subretinal tumor cell infiltrates. Elevation of IL-10 levels in the ocular fluid and/or an IL-10:IL-6 ratio >1 is highly suggestive of ocular lymphoma; however, for diagnosis confirmation, vitrectomy or, at specialized centers, chorioretinal biopsy usually is required (Chan et al. 2011).
Diagnosis of PCNSL is usually established by stereotactic biopsy from a CNS lesion. Making the diagnosis can be significantly hampered by pretreatment with glucocorticoids; thus, they should be avoided prior to surgery whenever possible.
In systemic lymphoma, a search for CNS involvement should be considered in patients with more than one extranodal site, elevated serum LDH, and ECOG performance status >2.
6 Treatment
6.1 Treatment of PCNSL
6.1.1 Role of Surgery
Surgery alone is not a viable treatment option due the infiltrative nature of lymphoma and its multifocality. The current approach is to abandon tumor resection excepted for patients with uncontrollable neurological deterioration due to brain herniation. The role of surgery is currently limited to stereotactic guided biopsy for diagnosis establishment. However, data from the first randomized phase III trial (G-PCNSL-SG1) trial have challenged this view (Weller et al. 2012).
6.1.2 Role of Radiotherapy
Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) produces complete remission (CR) in up to 90 % of patients, however, usually with a poor long-term disease control and median overall survival (OS) of only 12–16 months and a 5-year OS of 10–29 % (Nelson et al. 1992; Laperriere et al. 1997). In the latest 1990s, the combination of HDMTX-based chemotherapy followed by WBRT was established as standard therapy for PCNSL with CR rates between 69 and 87 % and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 24–40 months in phase II studies (Abrey et al. 2000; O’Brien et al. 2006; DeAngelis et al. 2002; Poortmans et al. 2003; Ferreri et al. 2006). Unfortunately, these improved long-term results were overshadowed by severe neurological impairment including dementia and death, particularly in older patients (Abrey et al. 1998; Gavrilovic et al. 2006). This led to the investigation of WBRT dose reduction or even radiotherapy withdrawal in patients with a CR after chemotherapy alone. It took until 2010 that a randomized phase III trial investigating the role of WBRT in the primary treatment of PCNSL was published. Here, no significant difference in OS (primary end point) was found when WBRT (45 Gy in 1.5 Gy fractions) was omitted from primary therapy (after HDMTX-based chemotherapy): OS in the per protocol population was 32.4 months with and 37.1 months without WBRT (p = 0.7; Fig. 11.9) (Thiel et al. 2010). However, a benefit for PFS was found (18.3 vs. 11.9 month, respectively, p = 0.13), which proved significant in subgroup analyses suggesting an important role of WBRT for disease control. This study has been criticized for the upfront randomization and the high number of protocol violations. Nevertheless, with a median patient age of 63 years, 24 % of patients >70 years, and 15 % of patients with KPS ≤ 40 %, this trial truly represented the “reality” of PCNSL management in the clinical routine. The results of this trial indicate that WBRT can be deleted from primary therapy of PCNSL.
When WBRT was used as salvage therapy, a response rate of 60–79 % and OS of 10.9–16 months were reported (Herrlinger et al. 2005; Nguyen et al. 2003; Hottinger et al. 2007). Response rates to WBRT and survival were similar between refractory and recurrent patients (Hottinger et al. 2007).
6.1.3 Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy should be considered first-line treatment for all PCNSL patients able to receive it. Drugs for PCNSL treatment need to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) which is supported by the observation that WBRT + CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin prednisolone) regimen has proved no better than WBRT alone (Mead et al. 2000). HDMTX (>3 g/m2) is the most important drug for treatment of PCNSL. With a short-time infusion (3–4 h), the majority of patients achieve cytotoxic levels in the CSF (Borsi and Moe 1987; Shapiro et al. 1975). In nonrandomized studies using chemotherapy alone, results comparable to those achieved with chemotherapy followed by WBRT were reported (Herrlinger et al. 2005; Batchelor et al. 2003; Hoang-Xuan et al. 2003; Pels et al. 2003; Juergens et al. 2010; Chamberlain and Johnston 2010). Higher response rates and probably longer disease control can be achieved when HDMTX is combined with other drugs. In the only randomized phase II trial with 79 patients comparing HDMTX monotherapy (3.5 g/m2 every 3 weeks) to HDMTX+ high-dose cytarabine (HDAraC), a significantly improved outcome was observed with the combination with CR rate of 46 % vs. 18 % (p = 0.006) and 3-year OS of 46 % vs. 32 % (p = 0.07), respectively (Ferreri et al. 2009). Hematologic toxicity was higher in the combination arm. The problem with this study was the underdose in the monotherapy arm resulting in a very poor outcome.
In the G-PCNSL-SG1 trial, the addition of ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2 over 3 days) to HDMTX introduced per amendment during the course of the study resulted in significantly improved CR rate of 42 % vs. 32 % and primary progression rate reduction of 15 % vs. 26 %. Not surprisingly, toxicity was higher with the combination, particularly in elderly patients (Thiel et al. 2010).
The best long-term results in PCNSL were reported with an intensive chemotherapy-only regimen including HDMTX (5 g/m2), HDAra-C (3 g/m2), vincristine, alkylating agents, and dexamethasone combined with intensive intraventricular chemotherapy (Pels et al. 2003). Median event-free survival (EFS) was 21 months and OS 50 months. A recent follow-up showed that 57 % of patients <60 years were alive after a median follow-up of 100 months without evidence of chemotherapy-related neurotoxicity (Juergens et al. 2010).
Intra-arterial infusion of MTX-based chemotherapy following osmotic blood–brain barrier disruption aiming at delivering higher drug concentrations to the tumor has been assessed by several groups. In the most recent multi-institutional analysis, the results were comparable or even better than with many conventional treatments with a 5-year PFS of 31 % and 7-year PFS of 25 %. However, the procedure can be associated with some acute toxicity and is presently available at specialized centers only (Angelov et al. 2009).
The role of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in PCNSL is not defined. As a large protein, it has poor penetration into the CNS as measured by CSF levels (Rubenstein et al. 2003). The combination of rituximab and HDMTX-based chemotherapy proved feasible and active in small studies (Chamberlain and Johnston 2010; Shah et al. 2007; Wieduwilt et al. 2012); however, one study (Shah et al. 2007) suggested increased hematologic toxicity of the combination.
6.1.4 Salvage Therapy
Salvage treatment should be chosen based on patient’s age, performance status, prior therapy, and duration of previous response. WBRT is a very effective salvage treatment with a response rate of >60 % and a median OS after relapse of 16 months, but with increased risk of neurotoxicity (Nguyen et al. 2003; Hottinger et al. 2007). Thus, delaying WBRT whenever possible and offering chemotherapy to patients with recurrent disease seems a reasonable option, particularly in those with good performance status and response to previous chemotherapy. Patients with a long-term remission after HDMTX can be rechallenged with a good chance for a second long-term remission (Plotkin et al. 2004). In several small studies, responses and sometimes long-term control were reported for temozolomide alone or with rituximab (Reni et al. 2007; Enting et al. 2004), topotecan (Fischer et al. 2006), and ifosfamide- or etoposide-based combination chemotherapy.
Promising results at relapse were reported with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). A regimen of thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide followed by ASCT produced a 2-year OS of 45 % in 43 patients who failed HDMTX therapy (Soussain et al. 2008). However, this approach is only suitable for selected patients at rather young age and in overall good condition.
6.1.5 Intra CSF Therapy
There is currently no consensus on intra CSF treatment in PCNSL. Results of two German studies suggested that in PCNSL, the CSF represents a reservoir for tumor cells, and therefore, separate treatment may be beneficial. Very encouraging results of a polychemotherapy protocol including intensive intraventricular chemotherapy via Ommaya reservoir resulting in excellent long-term survival of young patients could not be confirmed in a second trial using the same regimen without intraventricular treatment (Pels et al. 2003, 2009). Rapid tumor recurrence observed in the second trial was attributed to the omission of intraventricular treatment. Activity of rituximab given intrathecally was demonstrated in a study with ten patients with SCNSL or PCNSL (Rubenstein et al. 2007), and this approach needs further assessment.
6.1.6 High-Dose Chemotherapy and Stem Cell Transplantation (HDCT-ASCT)
To date, only relatively small series and phase II trials have been published on HDCT-ASCT in PCNSL. In the first study, 28 patients received induction chemotherapy with HDMTX (3.5 g/m2) and HD Ara-C (3 g/m2 for 2 days) followed by BEAM as conditioning regimen before ASCT (Abrey et al. 2003). Only 50 % of the patients completed the therapy, and the median event-free survival was only 5.6 months. More promising results were reported in a German phase II study with 30 patients <65 years treated with induction chemotherapy including HDMTX (8 g/m2), HD Ara-C (2 × 3 g/m2), and thiotepa (40 mg/m2) followed by a conditioning regimen with carmustine and thiotepa and ASCT. In the study, WBRT (45 Gy) was given to all patients as consolidation. With a median follow-up of 63 months, the 5-year OS was 69 % for all patients and 87 % for those completing HDCT-ASCT, respectively (Illerhaus et al. 2006).
Whether the discrepancies in effectiveness between BEAM and thiotepa-based conditioning regimens are related to the different capacity of these drugs to cross the BBB or have to be attributed to the efficacy of the specific agents is still unclear. The role of HDCT-ASCT in PCNSL remains to be defined and is currently being investigated.
6.1.7 Treatment of Elderly Patients
Approximately 50 % of all patients with PCNSL are aged ≥65 years. Age, beside performance status, is the most important prognostic factor in PCNSL (Abrey et al. 2006). Balancing treatment efficacy with toxicity is particularly challenging in the elderly. In a secondary analysis of the G-PCNSL-SG1 trial, the rate of complete and partial responses to HDMTX-based chemotherapy was lower (44 % vs. 57 %; p = 0.016), death on therapy more frequent (18 % vs. 11 %; p = 0.027), and PFS (4.0 vs. 7.7 months, p = 0.014) and OS (12.5 vs. 26.2 months, p < 0.001) inferior in the elderly (≥70 years). A striking difference between younger and elderly patients was the PFS of CR patients of 35.0 in the younger versus 16.1 in the elderly patients (p = 0.024) (Roth et al. 2012). However, in more selected populations treated at highly specialized institutions, more favorable treatment results can be achieved, demonstrating that vigorous therapy comparable to that given to younger patients can be successfully given to some older patients (Ney et al. 2010).
6.2 Secondary CNS Lymphoma
6.2.1 Prophylaxis
Optimal regimen for prophylaxis of CNS relapse in systemic lymphoma has not been established thus far. Current data support the use of systemic CNS penetrating chemotherapy (e.g., HDMTX) rather than intrathecal prophylaxis (Korfel 2011). The addition of rituximab to the CHOP regimen was reported to prevent CNS dissemination of DLBCL in a retrospective German analysis of patients >60 years (Boehme et al. 2009) and in younger patients with a low age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) (Schmitz et al. 2012). This has not been confirmed for younger patients with higher aaIPI (Schmitz et al. 2012) and by a French analysis (Feugier et al. 2004).
6.2.2 Treatment
Data on therapy of SCNSL is very limited. With intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, the prognosis is very poor with a median survival of only a few months (Herrlinger et al. 2009). With HDMTX, longer survival can be observed as found in a retrospective multicenter analysis of 113 patients with isolated CNS relapse without systemic lymphoma (median age 61 years, 62 % treated with HDMTX, and 53 % with WBRT) (Doolittle et al. 2008). However, in another retrospective study, a median OS of only 7 months has been outlined in 23 patients with isolated CNS relapse, all of whom received an intensive HDMTX-based chemotherapy including intrathecal chemotherapy in 15 (Patrij et al. 2011).
After small retrospective analyses had revealed long-term remissions in some patients treated with HDCT-ASCT (Alvarnas et al. 2000; Kasamon et al. 2005; Williams et al. 1994; Jahnke et al. 2006c), the first prospective multicenter study to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of HDCT-ASCT in patients with CNS relapse of aggressive systemic lymphoma has recently been conducted. The protocol included a sequential application of exclusively blood–brain barrier crossing cytostatics without radiotherapy (HDMTX, ifosfamide, HDAraC, followed by HDCT-ASCT with thiotepa, BCNU and etoposide) combined with liposomal cytarabine intrathecally. The results were very promising with 2-year time to treatment failure (primary end point) of 49 % for all patients and 58 % for patients completing HDCT-ASCT, suggesting that cure is possible in a substantial proportion of patients (Korfel et al. 2013).
7 Neurotoxicity
With improvements in survival, there is increasing concern regarding the incidence of late neurotoxicity associated with successful treatment of CNSL. The true risk of this complication has likely been underestimated since formal psychometric evaluations are not routinely performed and were not included in the vast majority of studies. Late neurotoxicity can be recognized by radiographic findings which indicate diffuse white-matter disease and cortical-subcortical atrophy with concordant findings at autopsy such as gliosis, thickening of small vessels, and demyelination (Fig. 11.10).
The risk of neurotoxicity increases with advanced age. In patients >60 years treated with WBRT, virtually all long-term survivors develop delayed neurotoxicity. In younger patients, late neurotoxicity was found in >20 % when evaluated clinically (Gavrilovic et al. 2006) and in 63 % when extensive neuropsychological assessment was used (Harder et al. 2004).
There is increasing recognition that radiotherapy is a primary mediator of neurotoxicity which is associated with progressive microvascular alterations and loss of oligodendrocyte progenitors. In a retrospective analysis of 185 patients, WBRT was the only factor associated with late neurotoxicity (evaluated by clinical examination only) in the multivariate setting (Omuro et al. 2005). In a most recent analysis of 80 long-term PCNSL survivors treated with different regimens with or without WBRT, those who received WBRT had significantly lower mean scores in attention/executive function, motor skills, and neuropsychological composite score compared to those treated with non-WBRT regimens. Moreover, on brain imaging, mean areas of total T2 abnormalities in the WBRT group were more than twice the mean of any other non-WBRT group. This was associated with poorer neuropsychological and QOL outcomes (Doolittle et al. 2012).
8 Future Directions
A better understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular biology of CNSL will help to improve current treatment strategies and develop novel therapeutic approaches. Because of the rarity of the disease, well-designed and adequately powered studies must be encouraged to allow for the collection of meaningful patient numbers within a reasonable time frame and to produce valid results. These trials would provide useful databases for translational research programs that may help to define particular patient populations at high risk for early relapse or the need for early treatment escalation. Standardized neuropsychological assessments should be included in all future trials whenever possible to help to determine cognitive alterations during the course of the disease more precisely and to allow the development of less toxic treatment.
References
Abrey LE, DeAngelis LM, Yahalom J (1998) Long-term survival in primary CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 16:859–863
Abrey LE, Yahalom J, DeAngelis LM (2000) Treatment for primary CNS lymphoma: the next step. J Clin Oncol 18:3144–3150
Abrey LE, Moskowitz CH, Mason WP, Crump M, Stewart D, Forsyth P, Paleologos N, Correa DD, Anderson ND, Caron D, Zelenetz A, Nimer SD, DeAngelis LM (2003) Intensive methotrexate and cytarabine followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: an intent-to-treat analysis. J Clin Oncol 21(22):4151–4156
Abrey LE, Batchelor TT, Ferreri AJ, Gospodarowicz M, Pulczynski EJ, Zucca E, Smith JR, Korfel A, Soussain C, DeAngelis LM, Neuwelt EA, O'Neill BP, Thiel E, Shenkier T, Graus F, van den Bent M, Seymour JF, Poortmans P, Armitage JO, Cavalli F, International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (2005) Report of an international workshop to standardize baseline evaluation and response criteria for primary CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5034–5043. Epub 2005 Jun 13
Abrey LE, Ben-Porat L, Panageas KS, Yahalom J, Berkey B, Curran W, Schultz C, Leibel S, Nelson D, Mehta M, DeAngelis LM (2006) Primary central nervous system lymphoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic model. J Clin Oncol 24(36):5711–5715
Alvarnas JC, Negrin RS, Horning SJ, Hu WW, Long GD, Schriber JR, Stockerl-Goldstein K, Tierney K, Wong R, Blume KG, Chao NJ (2000) High-dose therapy with hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with central nervous system involvement by non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 6(3A):352–358
Ambinder RF, Bhatia K, Martinez-Maza O, Mitsuyasu R (2010) Cancer biomarkers in HIV patients. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 5:531–537
Angelov L, Doolittle ND, Kraemer DF et al (2009) Blood–brain barrier disruption and Intraarterial methotrexate-based therapy for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: a multi-institutional experience. J Clin Oncol 27(21):3503–3509
Baraniskin A, Kuhnhenn J, Schlegel U, Chan A, Deckert M, Gold R, Maghnouj A, Zöllner H, Reinacher-Schick A, Schmiegel W, Hahn SA, Schroers R (2011) Identification of microRNAs in the cerebrospinal fluid as marker for primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system. Blood 117(11):3140–3146
Batchelor T, Carson K, O'Neill A, Grossman SA, Alavi J, New P, Hochberg F, Priet R (2003) Treatment of primary CNS lymphoma with methotrexate and deferred radiotherapy: a report of NABTT 96-07. J Clin Oncol 21(6):1044–1049
Boehme V, Zeynalova S, Kloess M, Loeffler M, Kaiser U, Pfreundschuh M, Schmitz N, German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL) (2007) Incidence and risk factors of central nervous system recurrence in aggressive lymphoma – a survey of 1693 patients treated in protocols of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). Ann Oncol 18(1):149–157. Epub 2006 Oct 3
Boehme V, Schmitz N, Zeynalova S, Loeffler M, Pfreundschuh M (2009) CNS events in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with modern chemotherapy (CHOP-14) with or without rituximab: an analysis of patients treated in the RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). Blood 113(17):3896–3902
Booman M, Douwes J, Glas AM et al (2006) Mechanisms and effects of loss of human leukocyte antigen class II expression in immune-privileged site-associated B-cell lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res 12:2698–2705
Borsi JD, Moe PJ (1987) A comparative study on the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate. In a dose range of 0.5 g to 33.6 g/m2 in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer 60:5–13
Braaten KM, Betensky RA, de Leval L et al (2003) BCL-6 expression predicts improved survival in patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res 9:1063–1069
Cady FM, O'Neill BP, Law ME et al (2008) Del(6)(q22) and BCL6 rearrangements in primary CNS lymphomas are indicators of an aggressive clinical course. J Clin Oncol 26:4814–4819
Cavaliere R, Petroni G, Lopes MB, Schiff D (2010) Primary central nervous system post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder: an International Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas Collaborative Group Report. Cancer 116:863–870
Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK (2010) High-dose methotrexate and rituximab with deferred radiotherapy for newly diagnosed primary B-cell CNS lymphoma. Neuro Oncol 12(7):736–744
Chan CC, Rubenstein JL, Coupland SE et al (2011) Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: a report from an international primary central nervous system lymphoma collaborative group symposium. Oncologist 16(11):1589–1599
Cinque P, Brytting M, Vago L et al (1993) Epstein-Barr virus DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with AIDS-related primary lymphomas of the central nervous system. Lancet 342:398–401
Collie A, Hsi ED (2013) Flow cytometric analysis of cerebrospinal fluid is low yield in samples without atypical morphology or prior history of hematologic malignancy. Am J Clin Pathol (in press)
De Luca A, Antinori A, Cingolani A et al (1995) Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid EBV-DNA and IL-10 as markers for in vivo diagnosis of AIDS-related primary central nervous system lymphomas. Br J Haematol 90: 844–849
DeAngelis LM, Seiferheld W, Schold SC, Fisher B, Schultz CJ (2002) Combination chemotherapy radiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 93–10. J Clin Oncol 20:4643–4648
Doolittle ND, Abrey LE, Shenkier TN, Tali S, Bromberg JE, Neuwelt EA, Soussain C, Jahnke K, Johnston P, Illerhaus G, Schiff D, Batchelor T, Montoto S, Kraemer DF, Zucca E (2008) Brain parenchyma involvement as isolated central nervous system relapse of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group report. Blood 111(3):1085–1093
Doolittle ND, Korfel A, Lubow MA, Schorb E, Schlegel US, Rogowski S, Fu R, Dosa E, Illerhaus G, Kraemer DF, Muldoon LL, Calabrese P, Hedrick N, Tyson RM, Jahnke K, Maron LM, Butler RW, Neuwelt EA (2012) Long-term assessment and correlation of neuropsychological, neuroimaging and quality of life outcomes in primary CNS lymphoma survivor. American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, Chicago, IL, 1–5 June 2012 (abstract 2040)
Enting RH, Demopoulos A, DeAngelis LM, Abrey LE (2004) Salvage therapy for primary CNS lymphoma with a combination of rituximab and temozolomide. Neurology 63(5):901–903
Ferreri AJ, Dell'Oro S, Foppoli M, Bernardi M, Brander AA, Tosoni A et al (2006) MATILDE regimen followed by radiotherapy is an active strategy against primary CNS lymphomas. Neurology 66:1435–1438
Ferreri AJ, Reni M, Foppoli M, Pangalis GA, Frezzato M, Cabras MG et al (2009) High dose cytarabine plus high-dose methotrexate versus high-dose methotrexate alone in patients with primary CNS lymphoma: a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet 374:1512–1520
Feugier P, Virion JM, Tilly H, Haioun C, Marit G, Macro M, Bordessoule D, Recher C, Blanc M, Molina T, Lederlin P, Coiffier B (2004) Incidence and risk factors for central nervous system occurrence in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: influence of rituximab. Ann Oncol 15(1):129–133
Fischer L, Thiel E, Klasen HA, Birkmann J, Jahnke K, Martus P et al (2006) Prospective trial on topotecan salvage therapy in primary CNS lymphoma. Ann Oncol 17:1141–1145
Fischer L, Korfel A, Pfeiffer S et al (2009a) CXCL13 and CXCL12 in central nervous system lymphoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 15:5968–5973
Fischer L, Korfel A, Pfeiffer S, Kiewe P, Volk HD, Cakiroglu H, Widmann T, Thiel E (2009b) CXCL13 and CXCL12 in central nervous system lymphoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 15(19):5968–5973
Fischer L, Hummel M, Korfel A et al (2011a) Differential micro-RNA expression in primary CNS and nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Neuro Oncol 13: 1090–1098
Gavrilovic IT, Hormigo A, Yahalom J, DeAngelis LM, Abrey LE (2006) Long-term follow up of high-dose methotrexate-based therapy with and without whole brain irradiation for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 24:4570–4574
Gerstner ER, Batchelor TT (2010) Primary central nervous system lymphomas. Arch Neurol 67:291–297
Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC et al (2004) Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood 103:275–282
Harder H, Holtel H, Bromberg JE et al (2004) Cognitive status and quality of life after treatment for primary CNS lymphoma. Neurology 62:544–547
Hattab EM, Martin SE, Al-Khatib SM et al (2010) Most primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphomas occurring in immunocompetent individuals belong to the nongerminal center subtype: a retrospective analysis of 31 cases. Mod Pathol 23:235–243
Herrlinger U, Küker W, Uhl M, Blaicher HP, Karnath HO, Kranz L et al (2005) NOA-03 trial of high-dose methotrexate in primary central nervous system lymphoma: final report. Ann Neurol 57:843–847
Herrlinger U, Glantz M, Schlegel U, Gisselbrecht C, Cavalli F (2009) Should intra-cerebrospinal fluid prophylaxis be part of initial therapy for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: what we know, and how we can find out more. Semin Oncol 36(4 Suppl 2):S25–S34
Hoang-Xuan K, Taillandier L, Chinot O, Soubeyran P, Bogdhan U, Hildebrand J, Frenay M, De Beule N, Delattre JY, Baron B, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group (2003) Chemotherapy alone as initial treatment for primary CNS lymphoma in patients older than 60 years: a multicenter phase II study (26952) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group. J Clin Oncol 21(14): 2726–2731
Hottinger AF, DeAngelis LM, Yahalom J, Abrey LE (2007) Salvage whole brain radiotherapy for recurrent or refractory primary CNS lymphoma. Neurology 69:1178–1182
Illerhaus G, Marks R, Ihorst G, Guttenberger R, Ostertag C, Derigs G et al (2006) High dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation and hyperfractionated radiotherapy as first-line treatment of primary CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 24:3865–3870
Jahnke K, Korfel A, O'Neill BP, Blay JY, Abrey LE, Martus P, Poortmans PM, Shenkier TN, Batchelor TT, Neuwelt EA, Raizer JJ, Schiff D, Pels H, Herrlinger U, Stein H, Thiel E (2006a) International study on low-grade primary central nervous system lymphoma. Ann Neurol 59(5):755–762
Jahnke K, Hummel M, Korfel A et al (2006b) Detection of subclinical systemic disease in primary CNS lymphoma by polymerase chain reaction of the rearranged immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes. J Clin Oncol 24:4754–4757
Jahnke K, Thiel E, Martus P, Schwartz S, Korfel A (2006c) Retrospective study of prognostic factors in non-Hodgkin lymphoma secondarily involving the central nervous system. Ann Hematol 85(1):45–50
Juergens A, Pels H, Rogowski S, Fliessbach K, Glasmacher A, Engert A, Reiser M, Diehl V, Vogt-Schaden M, Egerer G, Schackert G, Reichmann H, Kroschinsky F, Bode U, Herrlinger U, Linnebank M, Deckert M, Fimmers R, Schmidt-Wolf IG, Schlegel U (2010) Long-term survival with favorable cognitive outcome after chemotherapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma. Ann Neurol 67(2):182–189
Kasamon YL, Jones RJ, Piantadosi S, Ambinder RF, Abrams RA, Borowitz MJ, Morrison C, Smith BD, Flinn IW (2005) High-dose therapy and blood or marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma with central nervous system involvement. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 11(2):93–100
Kelley TW, Prayson RA, Barnett GH et al (2005) Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue arising in the lateral ventricle. Leuk Lymphoma 46:1423–1427
Knowles DM (2003) Etiology and pathogenesis of AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 17:785–820
Korfel A (2011) Prevention of central nervous system relapses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: which patients and how? Curr Opin Oncol 23(5):436–440
Korfel A, Weller M, Martus P, Roth P, Klasen HA, Roeth A, Rauch M, Hertenstein B, Fischer T, Hundsberger T, Leithäuser M, Birnbaum T, Kirchen H, Mergenthaler HG, Schubert J, Berdel W, Birkmann J, Hummel M, Thiel E, Fischer L (2012) Prognostic impact of meningeal dissemination in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL): experience from the G-PCNSL-SG1 trial. Ann Oncol 23(9):2374–2380
Korfel A, Etter T, Thiel E et al (2013) Phase II study of central nervous system (CSN) - directed chemotherapy including high - close chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation for CNS relopse of aggressive lymphomas. Haematologine 98(3):364–70
Küker W, Nägele T, Thiel E, Weller M, Herrlinger U (2005) Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL): MRI response criteria revised. Neurology 65(7):1129–1131
Laperriere HJ, Cerezo L, Milosevic MF, Wong CS, Patterson B, Panzarella T (1997) Primary lymphoma of brain: results of management of a modern cohort with radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 43:247–252
Levy O, Deangelis LM, Filippa DA et al (2008) Bcl-6 predicts improved prognosis in primary central nervous system lymphomas. Cancer 112:151–156
Lin CH, Kuo KT, Chuang SS et al (2006) Comparison of the expression and prognostic significance of differentiation markers between diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of central nervous system origin and peripheral nodal origin. Clin Cancer Res 12:1152–1156
Ly KI, Fintelmann F, Forghani R et al (2011) Novel diagnostic approaches in Bing-Neel syndrome. Clin Lymphomas Myeloma Leuk 11:180–183
Mazzucchelli L, Blaser A, Kappeler A et al (1999) BCA-1 is highly expressed in Helicobacter pylori-induced mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and gastric lymphoma. J Clin Invest 104:R49–R54
McCann KJ, Ashton-Key M, Smith K, Stevenson FK, Ottensmeier CH (2009) Primary central nervous system lymphoma: tumor-related clones exist in the blood and bone marrow with evidence for separate development. Blood 113:4677–4680
Mead GM, Bleehen NM, Gregor A, Bullimore J, Shirley D, Rampling RP et al (2000) A medical research council randomized trial in patients with primary cerebral non-Hodgkin lymphoma: cerebral radiotherapy with and without cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy. Cancer 89:1359–1370
Momota H, Narita Y, Maeshima AM et al (2010) Prognostic value of immunohistochemical profile and response to high-dose methotrexate therapy in primary CNS lymphomas. J Neurooncol 98:341–348
Montesinos-Rongen M, Kuppers R, Schluter D et al (1999) Primary central nervous system lymphomas are derived from germinal-center B cells and show a preferential usage of the V4-34 gene segment. Am J Pathol 155:2077–2086
Montesinos-Rongen M, Schmitz R, Brunn A et al (2010) Mutations of CARD11 but not TNFAIP3 may activate the NF-kappaB pathway in primary CNS lymphomas. Acta Neuropathol 120:529–535
Nelson DF, Martz KL, Bonner H, Nelson JS, Newall J, Kerman HD et al (1992) Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the brain: can high dose, large volume radiation therapy improve survival? Report on a prospective trial by the radiation oncology group (RTOG): RTOG 8315. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23:9–17
Ney DE, Reiner AS, Panageas KS, Brown HS, DeAngelis LM, Abrey LE (2010) Characteristics and outcomes of elderly patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Cancer 116(19):4605–4612
Nguyen PL, Chakravarti A, Finkelstein DM, Hochberg F, Batchelor TT, Loeffler JS (2003) Results of whole brain radiation as salvage of methotrexate failure for Immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 23:1507–1513
O’Brien PC, Roos DE, Pratt G, Liew KH, Barton MB, Poulson MG et al (2006) Combined modality therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: long-term data from a phase II multicenter study (Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64:408–413
Omuro AM, Ben-Porat LS, Panageas KS, Kim AK, Correa DD, Yahalom J, Deangelis LM, Abrey LE (2005) Delayed neurotoxicity in primary central nervous system lymphoma. Arch Neurol 62(10): 1595–1600
Patrij K, Reiser M, Watzel L, Pels H, Kowoll A, Herrlinger U et al (2011) Isolated central nervous system relapse of systemic lymphoma (SCNSL): clinical features and outcome of a retrospective analysis. Ger Med Sci 9, ISSN 1612-3174
Pels H, Schmidt-Wolf IG, Glasmacher A, Schulz H, Engert A, Diehl V et al (2003) Primary central nervous system lymphoma: results of a pilot and phase II study of systemic and intraventricular chemotherapy with deferred radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 21:4489–4495
Pels H, Juergens A, Glasmacher A et al (2009) Early relapses in primary CNS lymphoma after response to polychemotherapy without intraventricular treatment: results of a phase II study. J Neurooncol 91(3): 299–305
Plotkin SR, Betensky RA, Hochberg FH, Grossman SA, Lesser GJ, Nabors LB, Chon B, Batchelor TT (2004) Treatment of relapsed central nervous system lymphoma with high-dose methotrexate. Clin Cancer Res 10(17):5643–5646
Poortmans PM, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Haaxma-Reiche H, Van’t Veer M, Hansen M, Soubeyran P et al (2003) High-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy followed by consolidating radiotherapy in non-AIDS-related primary central nervous system lymphoma: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Group Phase II Trial 20962. J Clin Oncol 21(24):4483–4488
Preusser M, Woehrer A, Koperek O et al (2010) Primary central nervous system lymphomas: a clinicopathological study of 75 cases. Pathology 42:547–552
Reni M, Zaja F, Mason W, Perry J, Mazza E, Spina M et al (2007) Temozolomide as salvage treatment in primary brain lymphomas. Br J Cancer 96:864–867
Riemersma SA, Jordanova ES, Schop RF et al (2000) Extensive genetic alterations of the HLA region, including homozygous deletions of HLA class II genes in B-cell lymphomas arising in immune-privileged sites. Blood 96:3569–3577
Roth P, Martus P, Kiewe P, Möhle R, Klasen H, Rauch M, Röth A, Kaun S, Thiel E, Korfel A, Weller M (2012) Outcome of elderly patients with primary CNS lymphoma in the G-PCNSL-SG-1 trial. Neurology 28:79(9)
Rubenstein JL, Combs D, Rosenberg J, Levy A, McDermott M, Damon L, Ignoffo R, Aldape K, Shen A, Lee D, Grillo-Lopez A, Shuman MA (2003) Rituximab therapy for CNS lymphomas: targeting the leptomeningeal compartment. Blood 101(2):466–468
Rubenstein JL, Fridlyand J, Shen A et al (2006) Gene expression and angiotropism in primary CNS lymphomas. Blood 107:3716–3723
Rubenstein JL, Fridlyand J, Abrey L et al (2007) Phase I study of intraventricular administration of rituximab in patients with recurrent CNS and intraocular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25(11):1350–1356
Rubenstein JL, Hsi ED, Johnson JL et al (2013) Intensive chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: CALGB 50202 (Alliance 50202). J Clin Oncol 31(25):3061–3068
Sancho JM, Orfao A, Quijano S, García O, Panizo C, Pérez-Ceballos E, Deben G, Salar A, González-Barca E, Alonso N, García-Vela JA, Capote J, Peñalver FJ, Provencio M, Arias J, Plaza J, Caballero D, Morado M, Feliu E, Ribera JM, Spanish Group for the Study of CNS Disease in NHL (2010) Clinical significance of occult cerebrospinal fluid involvement assessed by flow cytometry in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients at high risk of central nervous system disease in the rituximab era. Eur J Haematol 85(4):321–328
Schmitz N, Zeynalova S, Glass B, Kaiser U, Cavallin-Stahl E, Wolf M et al (2012) CNS disease in younger patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma: an analysis of patients treated on the Mabthera International Trial and trials of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group. Ann Oncol 23(5): 1267–1273
Schroers R, Baraniskin A, Heute C et al (2010a) Diagnosis of leptomeningeal disease in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of the central nervous system by flow cytometry and cytopathology. Eur J Haematol 85:520–528
Schroers R, Baraniskin A, Heute C, Kuhnhenn J, Alekseyev A, Schmiegel W, Schlegel U, Pels HJ (2010b) Detection of free immunoglobulin light chains in cerebrospinal fluids of patients with central nervous system lymphomas. Eur J Haematol 85(3):236–242. Epub 2010 May 26
Shah GD, Yahalom J, Correa DD, Lai RK, Raizer JJ, Schiff D, LaRocca R, Grant B, DeAngelis LM, Abrey LE (2007) Combined immunochemotherapy with reduced whole-brain radiotherapy for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25(30):4730–4735. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol 26(2):340 (2008)
Shapiro WR, Young DF, Mehta BM (1975) Methotrexate: distribution in cerebrospinal. Fluid after intravenous, ventricular and lumbar injections. N Engl J Med 293:161–166
Smith JR, Falkenhagen KM, Coupland SE, Chipps TJ, Rosenbaum JT, Braziel RM (2007) Malignant B cells from patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma express stromal cell-derived factor-1. Am J Clin Pathol 127:633–641
Song MK, Chung JS, Joo YD et al (2011) Clinical importance of Bcl-6-positive non-deep-site involvement in non-HIV-related primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. J Neurooncol 104:825–831
Soussain C, Hoang-Xuan K, Taillandier L et al (2008) Intensive chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for refractory and recurrent primary CNS and intraocular lymphoma: Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle Osseuse-Therapie Cellulaire. J Clin Oncol 26(15):2512–2518
Thiel E, Korfel A, Martus P, Kanz L, Griesinger F, Rauch M, Röth A, Hertenstein B, von Toll T, Hundsberger T, Mergenthaler HG, Leithäuser M, Birnbaum T, Fischer L, Jahnke K, Herrlinger U, Plasswilm L, Nägele T, Pietsch T, Bamberg M, Weller M (2010) High-dose methotrexate with or without whole brain radiotherapy for primary CNS lymphoma (G-PCNSL-SG-1): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 11(11):1036–1047
Tu PH, Giannini C, Judkins AR et al (2005) Clinicopathologic and genetic profile of intracranial marginal zone lymphomas: a primary low-grade CNS lymphomas that mimics meningioma. J Clin Oncol 23:5718–5727
Tun HW, Personett D, Baskerville KA et al (2008) Pathway analysis of primary central nervous system lymphoma. Blood 111:3200–3210
Urrego PA, Smethurst M, Fowkes M et al (2011) Primary CNS plasmablastic lymphomas: report of a case with CSF cytology, flow cytometry, radiology, histological correlation, and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 39:616–620
Villa D, Connors JM, Shenkier TN, Gascoyne RD, Sehn LH, Savage KJ (2010) Incidence and risk factors for central nervous system relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the impact of the addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 21(5):1046–1052
Weller M, Martus P, Roth P, Thiel E, Korfel A, German PCNSL Study Group (2012) Surgery for primary CNS lymphoma? Challenging a paradigm. Neuro Oncol 14(12):1481–1484
Wieduwilt MJ, Valles F, Issa S, Behler CM, Hwang J, McDermott M, Treseler P, O'Brien J, Shuman MA, Cha S, Damon LE, Rubenstein JL (2012) Immunochemotherapy with intensive consolidation for primary CNS lymphoma: a pilot study and prognostic assessment by diffusion-weighted MRI. Clin Cancer Res 18(4):1146–1155
Williams CD, Pearce R, Taghipour G, Green ES, Philip T, Goldstone AH (1994) Autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and CNS involvement: those transplanted with active CNS disease have a poor outcome–a report by the European Bone Marrow Transplant Lymphoma Registry. J Clin Oncol 12(11):2415–2422
Yegappan S, Coupland R, Arber DA et al (2001) Angiotropic lymphomas: an immunophenotypically and clinically heterogeneous lymphomas. Mod Pathol 14:1147–1156
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Korfel, A., Rubenstein, J., Ott, G., Hsi, E.D. (2014). CNS Lymphoma. In: Dreyling, M., Williams, M. (eds) Rare Lymphomas. Hematologic Malignancies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39590-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39590-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39589-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39590-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)