Abstract
The chapter elaborates the adaptation initiatives undertaken by farmers in South Asia, and advocates the need for strong policies to support agricultural adaptation. It elicits the farmers’ perceptions and adaptation measures toward climate change and extent of adaptation through computing an index and supports strong extension and policy initiatives to enhance agricultural adaptation for combating food insecurity. It has identified the fact that rises in temperatures, decreases in rainfall, and frequent incidences of pests and diseases are the common perceptions of farmers toward climate change, both for drought and floods. Adaptation measures practiced by farmers’ for drought are buying insurance, change in planting dates and planting times, work as labor, and construct water harvesting structures. For floods, early sowings, saltwater spray for harvested paddy stalks, strengthening of riverbanks, and improved drainage are the adaptation measures.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
The impacts of climate change on agriculture are being witnessed all over the world, but countries especially like India in South Asia are more vulnerable in view of the large population depending on agriculture and excessive pressure on natural resources. Rainfed agriculture is likely to be impacted severely in view of its high dependency on monsoon and the likelihood of increased extreme weather events due to aberrant behavior of southwest monsoon in this part of the world. While reducing the greenhouse gas emissions holds key in addressing the problem, successful adaptation to climate change is important to stabilize the productivity. Adapting to climate change is a continuous process, and communities have wealth of information. Climate change is becoming a major driver of disasters, with increasingly frequent and intense floods and storms affecting more people globally. Increased forced displacement is an extremely likely consequence of such events. Heightened drought risk, desertification, sea-level rise, and changes in the availability of water and fertile land, coupled with reduced access to basic resources, will also fuel longer-term migration and forced displacement. As a first step, there is a need to document all the indigenous practices farmers have been following over time for coping with climate change. A better understanding of the farmers’ perceptions toward climate change, the practices they adopt, and the factors that contribute to the decision-making help in formulating policies and programs aimed at minimizing the losses and reducing the risk due to climate variability and change. Understanding how and why farmers have responded to climatic change is a necessary step to informing how to support current and future adaptation.
Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture in India
Agriculture is one of the largest contributors to India’s gross domestic product (GDP), approximately 20 %. It is the main source of livelihood for almost 60 % of the country’s total population. The impacts of climate change on agriculture will therefore be severely felt in India. It has been projected that under the scenario of a 2.5–4.9 °C temperature rise in India, rice yields will drop by 32–40 % and wheat yields by 41–52 % (GOI 2011; Guiteras 2007; OECD 2002). This would cause GDP to fall by 1.8–3.4 %. Despite the gloomy predictions about the negative impacts for India’s agricultural sector, changing climate is expected to bring opportunities as well, e.g., production gains through the CO2 fertilization effect or the expansion of cultivated land to higher altitudes and northern latitudes. The share of Indian livestock in the GDP is about 7 %. Indian livestock are responsible for about 54 % of total methane emission in India. Increasing sea and river water temperature is likely to affect fish breeding, migration, and harvests. A rise in temperature as small as 1 °C could have important and rapid effects on the mortality of fish and their geographical distributions, and hence climate change effects could be very significant for fisheries (Climate Change and 12th Five Year Plan 2011).
Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change
Food production is vulnerable to climate shifts because crops and cropping systems are adapted to local conditions: slight perturbations such as temperature fluctuations at critical points in crop development can have substantial impacts on productivity (Hatfield et al. 2011). Climate change also threatens the long-term capacity for food production through increased soil erosion and reduced soil fertility (Lal et al. 2011). The certainty of increased need for food to feed a burgeoning global population and the uncertainty of the short- and long-term impacts of climate change on agriculture combines to make efforts to enhance the resilience of agricultural systems a top societal priority (IFPRI-International Food Policy Research Institute 2010). The recognition that climate change-related threats to agriculture also represent threats to quality of life on a global scale has led to an increasing amount of attention to adaptation and mitigation strategies for agriculture (e.g., Howden et al. 2007; McCarl 2010). Calls for adaptive action have acknowledged that farmers are both among the most vulnerable groups to climate change and the ones on whom the task of adapting to climate change and mitigating agriculture’s contribution to it largely falls (Berry et al. 2006). At the same time, farmer willingness and capacity to respond to climate change is a social process based on the social construction of the risks and vulnerabilities of increasingly variable climate conditions. The farmer is a critical decision maker if agricultural lands are to be effectively managed to adapt to changing climate conditions (Gordon et al. 2013).
Agriculture in developing countries is one of the most vulnerable sectors of the global economy to climate change (Kurukulasuriya et al. 2006; Seo and Mendelsohn 2008a). Farmers whose livelihoods depend on the use of natural resources are likely to bear the brunt of adverse climate impacts. Farmers will be hard hit if they do not adjust at all to new climates (Mendelsohn et al. 1994; Rosenzweig and Hillel 1998; Reilly et al. 1996). Adaptation to climate change requires that farmers first notice that climate has changed and then identify useful adaptations and implement them (Maddison 2006). Adaptation is widely recognized as a vital component of any policy response to climate change. Studies show that without adaptation, climate change is generally detrimental to the agriculture sector, but with adaptation, vulnerability can largely be reduced (Easterling et al. 1993; Reilly and Schimmelpfennig 1999; Smit and Skinner 2002). The degree to which an agricultural system is affected by climate change depends on its adaptive capacity. The adaptive capacity of a system describes its ability to modify its characteristics or behavior so as to cope better with changes in external conditions. Adaptive capacity is determined by various factors including recognition of the need to adapt, willingness to undertake adaptation, and the availability of, and ability to deploy, resources (Brown 2010). Recent empirical studies indicate that farmers have already adapted to the existing climates that they face by choosing crops or livestock or irrigation (Kurukulasuriya and Mendelsohn 2007, 2008; Nhemachena and Hassan 2007; Seo and Mendelsohn 2008b, 2008c) ideal for their current climate. The adaptation strategies must not be used in isolation. For example, the use of early-maturing crop varieties must be accompanied by other crop management practices such as crop rotation or the use of cover crops. This, however, requires additional institutional support, such as credit and access to input, markets, and information. Information about farmers’ awareness of climate change and current adaptation approaches would assist policymakers in their efforts to decrease the country’s vulnerability to the adverse impacts of climate change (Deressa et al. 2008). However, limited information exists on the impact, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change, especially at household levels. Given this knowledge gap, there is a need to carefully evaluate the impact of climate change on rural livelihoods in order to provide authorities with timely information for adaptation strategies.
The objective of the present study was to identify farmers’ perceptions toward climate change (both drought and floods) along with their farm-level adaptation measures in South India with a view to suggest appropriate research/policy issues which help in facilitating farmers’ adaptation. Role of extension in facilitating adaptation to climate change is discussed.
Methodology
Among South Indian states, Andhra Pradesh was chosen as the locale of this study since (a) the farmers in this region are exposed to a great degree of climate variability resulting in high vulnerability and (b) researchers’ familiarity with local language and culture. Anantapur, Mahbubnagar, and East Godavari districts representing three different regions of the state were selected randomly. Anantapur and Mahbubnagar have a semiarid climate with average annual rainfall being 560 and 600 mm, respectively, whereas East Godavari has a coastal climate with annual rainfall of 1,100 mm. The predominant crops are groundnut in Anantapur; maize, groundnut, and cotton in Mahbubnagar; and paddy in East Godavari district, so the semiarid districts of Anantapur and Mahbubnagar grow dryland crops, whereas the coastal district of East Godavari grows waterlogged crops like paddy. A sample of 180 farmers at the rate of 60 each from Anantapur, Mahbubnagar, and East Godavari districts of Andhra Pradesh in South India were selected randomly. Three mandals (a mandal is a unit of administration above village and below district level in a state and comprises several villages) each from the selected districts, with two villages under each mandal, were chosen randomly. From each village, ten farmers were selected randomly for collecting data. The selected mandals, with villages in parentheses, for the above three districts are given in Table 1. Data was collected using a pretested interview schedule from the farmers along with focused group discussions. Percent analysis and composite index (adaptation index was computed by the formula: adapted measures/total recommended measures × 100) developed in the study were used for analyzing data.
Results and Discussion
Farmers’ perceptions and Adaptation Measures Toward Climate Change
From Table 2, it is evident that rise in temperatures followed by decrease in rainfall, advanced onset of monsoon, middle long dry spells, terminal heavy rains, prevalence of pests and diseases, and ITKs for weather forecast failing are the major farmers’ perceptions in that order of magnitude regarding climate change in Anantapur. Bryan et al. (2009) in their study in Ethiopia and South Africa reported that farmers experienced increased temperature and decreased rainfall. Similar observations were reported by Vedwan and Rhoades (2001), Hageback et al. (2005), and Dejene (2011) in their studies. Results of a study conducted in Bundi district of Rajasthan, India, revealed farmers’ perceptions to climate change as increase in temperatures, decreased rainfall, and long dry spells. The chief adaptation measures followed by farmers are change in planting time, intercropping, soil and water conservation, and planting drought-tolerant crops (Dhaka et al. 2010).
Table 3 illustrates that buying insurance, changing planting dates of groundnut, intercropping with red gram, construction of water-harvesting structures, and requiring of quick-maturing, drought-resistant varieties in that order of magnitude are the major adaptation measures followed by farmers toward climate change in Anantapur. This finding is consistent with that of Swanson et al. (2008) who reported that crop insurance was widely used by farmers in Foremost region of Canada (which is similarly dry), and the common feeling was that even though it might not provide sufficient returns for losses incurred, it does offer some protection. It has allowed them to continue farming. Agricultural insurance can help people to cope with the financial losses incurred as a result of weather extremes. Insurance supports farmers in their adaptation process and prevents them from falling into absolute poverty. Apart from stabilizing household incomes by reducing the economic risk, insurance can also enhance farmers’ willingness to adapt, make use of innovations, and invest in new technologies (Anna et al. 2011). Agricultural adaptation involves two types of modifications in production systems. The first is increased diversification that involves engaging in production activities that are drought tolerant and/or resistant to temperature stresses as well as activities that make efficient use and take full advantage of the prevailing water and temperature conditions, among other factors. Crop diversification can serve as insurance against rainfall variability as different crops are affected differently by climate events (Orindi and Eriksen 2005; Adger et al. 2003). The second strategy focuses on crop management practices geared toward ensuring that critical crop growth stages do not coincide with very harsh climatic conditions such as mid-season droughts. Crop management practices that can be used include modifying the length of the growing period and changing planting and harvesting dates (Orindi and Eriksen 2005).
From Table 4, it is clear that rise in temperatures followed by decrease in rainfall, prolonged dry spells in between rains, terminal heavy rains, and prevalence of pests and diseases (powdery mildew, mold in castor; smut and jassids in paddy) are the major farmers’ perceptions in that order of magnitude regarding climate change in Mahbubnagar. It is striking to note that farmers across the world show a remarkable unanimity in observations of seasonal change, particularly regarding rain falling in most intense bursts, and generally higher temperatures and longer hot, dry spells within rainy seasons, with effects on soil moisture (Jennings and Magrath 2009). Kemausuor et al. (2011) reported that a large percentage (93 %) of farmers was of the opinion that the timing of the rains is now irregular and unpredictable.
As stated by farmers in Table 5 , staggered sowings, change in planting dates, requiring of drought-resistant crops, and construction of water-harvesting structures are the major adaptation measures followed by farmers toward climate change in Mahbubnagar.
Also, the farmers in Mahbubnagar are used to observe the pattern of rainy season, and if it gets copious rains, they will continue farming. Otherwise, they migrate and work as construction labor at Gangavati, Hyderabad, and Bangalore. Higher temperatures and pest and disease attack on crops were the chief perceptions of farmers toward climate change, while planting different crops and water conservation were the main adaptation strategies of farmers in Ogbomosho Agricultural Zone of Oyo State in Nigeria (Ayanwuyi et al. 2010).
Table 6 points to rise in temperatures, followed by decrease in rainfall, incidence of pests and diseases, terminal heavy cyclonic rains, and ITKs for rain forecast failing as the major farmers’ perceptions in that order of magnitude regarding climate change in East Godavari.
Table 7 indicates that early sowings, saltwater spray for harvested paddy stalks, strengthening of riverbanks and improved drainage, survey number wise insurance, and loans to tenant farmers are the major adaptation measures perceived by farmers toward climate change in East Godavari. Migration of construction labor if monsoon fails (June–September rains) in rainfed areas of the district is another common phenomenon (Ravi Shankar et al. 2013).
Since most smallholder farmers are operating under resource limitations, lack of credit facilities and other inputs compounds the limitations of resource availability, and the implications are that farmers fail to meet transaction costs necessary to acquire the adaptation measures they might want to and at times farmers cannot make beneficial use of the available information they might have (Kandlinkar and Risbey 2000). Lack of access to credit has been observed in previous studies (Nhemachena and Hassan 2007) to be a barrier to responding to climate change. Furthering adaptive capacity is in line with general sustainable development, and policies that help reduce pressure on resources reduce environmental risks and increase the welfare of the poorest members of the society.
A better understanding of how farmers perceive climate change, ongoing adaptation measures, and the factors influencing the decision to adapt farming practices is needed to craft policies and programs aimed at promoting successful adaptation of the agricultural sector (Bryan et al. 2009).
Computation of Adaptation Index to Assess the Extent of Farmers’ Adaptation to Climate Change
Each farmer was scored for adaptation by assigning scores of 0, 1, and 2 for non-, partial, and full adaptation of a measure, respectively. In case of drought and floods, total adaptation measures were 8 for each, respectively, and hence maximum adaptation score that can be obtained is 16, while minimum adaptation score that can be obtained by a farmer is 0. Adaptation indices were computed by dividing adapted measures with total recommended measures and multiplied with 100 for assessing the extent of adaptation. Adaptation index is expressed in percentage (%).
The adaptation indices for the three districts along with their SD (standard deviation) and CV (coefficient of variation) values are presented in Table 8. Table 8 shows that the mean adaptation index value for floods (12.13) (East Godavari) is greater than that for droughts (11.90, 11.65) (Anantapur and Mahbubnagar, respectively).
Village-Wise and Practice-Wise Adaptation Scores of Farmers
Adaptation to climate change is the adjustment of a system to moderate the impacts of climate change to take advantage of new opportunities or to cope with consequences (Adger et al. 2003).
From Tables 9, 10, and 11, the villages, namely, Podarallapalli in Anantapur (13.2), Machanpally in Mahbubnagar (12.6), and Gollaprolu in East Godavari (13.9), showed highest mean adaptation values for droughts and floods, respectively.
The code and the adaptation practice it represents are given in Tables 12 and 13.
From Table 14, practices A3 (construction of water-harvesting structures), A4 (drought-resistant crops), A7 (crop management by adjusting planting dates), and A8 (soil management by mulching, conservation tillage) showed highest adaptation in Anantapur. This amply illustrates the need for water harvesting, storage, and reuse.
From Table 15, practices A3 (construction of water-harvesting structures), A4 (drought-resistant crops), A7 (crop management by adjusting planting dates), and A8 (soil management by mulching, conservation tillage) showed highest adaptation in Mahbubnagar. This amply illustrates the need for water harvesting, storage, and reuse.
From Table 16, practices A3 (flood forecasting and early warning systems), A4 (drainage aspects), A5 (better soil and crop management practices), and A8 (community-based water management) showed highest adaptation in East Godavari. The problem here is managing excess water.
Conclusion
Common perceptions of climate change across the three regions in AP are rise in temperatures, decrease in precipitation, and incidence of pests and diseases to crops. Adaptation measures practiced for drought are insurance, change in planting dates, working as migrant laborer, and construction of WHS. For floods, early sowings, saltwater spray for harvested paddy stalks, strengthening of riverbanks, and improved drainage are the chief adaptation measures. The mean adaptation index value for floods (East Godavari) is greater than that for droughts (Anantapur and Mahbubnagar). Practice A7 (crop management by adjusting planting dates) showed highest adaptation in Anantapur and Mahbubnagar. Practice A5 (better soil and crop management practices) showed highest adaptation in East Godavari.
Rise in temperatures is almost always echoed by farmers irrespective of season and place. Decreasing precipitation is yet another common concern, which usually when occurring in severe intensity bursts does an impression of pricking on human skin. Water conservation is the need of the hour, to avoid runoff of excess rainwater in a short period of time. Farmers believe that it has great potential in addressing the impacts of climate change. Incidence of pests and diseases on crops complement with varying humidity levels in the atmosphere deserves attention. Until now minor crop pests, be it on dry sorghum or castor and paddy, are becoming major is another important observation by farmers.
Adaptation/adjustments to climate change at household level by farmers which are carried single handedly through experience and observation require greater support in terms of continuance with or without slight modifications. Insurance, changing planting dates, and planting different crops in a staggered manner come under this household adaptation category. Construction of water-harvesting structures under MGNREGA in dry districts of the study is an encouraging sign and should be promoted wherever possible. Since crop management strategies are ad hoc and immediate, farmers show a great degree of preference to it to tide over the situation, for example, change in planting dates, intercrops, etc. However, in attaining greater resilience toward climate change, soil management concepts and practices should be instilled among farmers like conservation tillage, mulching, recycling of nutrients, etc. For floods, proper drainage system for the floodwaters to empty into the sea is lacking. Drainage systems often suffer from inadequate maintenance and need improvement works like desiltation, lining of the walls, and weed removal. There is need for imparting greater awareness, education, and training about climate change issues to farmers in supporting adaptation efforts. The challenge which remains for scientists is developing quick-maturing, drought- and lodging-resistant crop varieties to surmount the current and future climate change in agriculture.
References
Adger WN, Huq S, Brown K, Conway D, Hulme M (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog Dev Stud 3:179–195
Anna K, Zemek O, Schellhardt S (2011) Adaptation in agriculture. In: Adaptation to climate change with a focus on rural areas and India. A cooperative effort of republic of India and federal republic of Germany. New Delhi, pp 40–83, 230
Ayanwuyi E, Kuponiyi E, Ogunlade FA, Oyetoro JO (2010) Farmers perception of impact of climate changes on food crop production in Ogbomosho agricultural Zone of Oyo State, Nigeria. Global J Hum Social Sci 10(7):33–39
Berry PM, Rounsevell MDA, Harrison PA, Audsley E (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy in facilitating adaptation. Environ Sci Pol 9:189–204
Brown K (2010) Climate change and development short course: resilience and adaptive capacity (power point presentation). International Development University of East Anglia, Norwich
Bryan E, Deressa TT, Gbetibouo GA, Ringler C (2009) Adaptation to climate change in Ethiopia and South Africa: options and constraints. Environ Sci Pol 12(4):413–426
Climate Change and 12th Five Year Plan, Report of Sub-group on Climate Change (2011) Government of India Planning Commission New Delhi, pp 97
Dejene Mengistu K (2011) Farmers’ perception and knowledge of climate change and their coping strategies to the related hazards: case study from Adiha central Tigray Ethiopia. Agr Sci 2:138–145
Deressa T, Hassan RM, Alemu T, Yesuf M, Ringler C (2008) Analyzing the determinants of Farmers’ choice of adaptation methods and perceptions of climate change in the Nile basin of Ethiopia. IFPRI discussion paper no. 00798. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
Dhaka BL, Chayal K, Poonia MK (2010) Analysis of Farmers’ perception and adaptation strategies to climate change. Libyan Agr Res Cent J Int 1(6):388–390
Easterling WE, Crosson PR, Rosenberg NJ, McKenney MS, Katz LA, Lemon KM (1993) Agricultural impacts of and responses to climate change in the Missouri-Iowa-Nebraska Region. Clim Change 24(1–2):23–62
GOI-Government of India (2011): Agriculture. http://india.gov.in/sectors/agriculture/index.php
Gordon Arbuckle J Jr, Wright Morton L, Hobbs J (2013) Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: evidence from Iowa. Clim Change. doi 10.1007/s10584-013-0700-0. Published online on 9 Feb 2013 with open access at Springerlink.com
Guiteras R (2007) The impact of climate change on Indian agriculture. http://www.colgate.edu/portaldata/imagegallerywww/2050/ImageGallery/GuiterasPaper.pdf
Hageback JM, Sundbery D, Ostroald Chen X, Knutsson P (2005) Climate variability and land use change in Danagou watershed, China-examples of small scale farmers adaptation. Clim Change 72:189–212
Hatfield JL, Ort D, Thomson AM, Wolfe D, Izaurralde RC, Boote KJ, Kimball BA, Ziska LH (2011) Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron J 103(2):351–370
Howden SM, Soussana JF, Tubiello FN, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H (2007) Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(50):19691–19696
IFPRI (2010) Food security, farming, and climate change: Scenarios, results, policy options. IFPRI, Washington
Jennings S, Magrath J (2009) What happened to the seasons? Oxfam research report. Available online at: http://www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/policy/climate_change/research-where-are-the-seasons.html
Kandlinkar M, Risbey J (2000) Agricultural impacts of climate change: if adaptation is the answer, what is the question? Clim Change 45:529–539
Kemausuor F, Dwamena E, Bart-Plange A, Baffour NK (2011) Farmers’ perception of climate change in the Ejura-Sekyedumase District of Ghana. ARPN J Agr Biol Sci 6(10):26–37
Kurukulasuriya P, Mendelsohn R (2007) Modeling endogenous irrigation: the impact of climate change on farmers in Africa. World Bank policy research working paper 4278
Kurukulasuriya P, Mendelsohn R (2008) Crop switching as an adaptation strategy to climate change. Afr J Agr Resour Econ 2(1):105–126
Kurukulasuriya P, Mendelsohn R, Hassan R, Benhin J, Deressa T, Diop M, Eid HM, Fosu KY, Gbetibouo G, Jain S, Mahamadou A, Mano R, Kabubo-Mariara J, El-Marsafawy S, Molua E, Ouda S, Ouedraogo M, Sene I, Maddision D, Seo SN, Dinar A (2006) Will African agriculture survive climate change? World Bank Econ Rev 20(3):367–388
Lal R, Delgado JA, Groffman PM, Millar N, Dell C, Rotz A (2011) Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change. J Soil Water Conserv 66(4):276–285
Maddison D (2006) The perception of and adaptation to climate change in Africa. CEEPA discussion paper no. 10 Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa Pretoria, South Africa, University of Pretoria
McCarl BA (2010) Analysis of climate change implications for agriculture and forestry: an interdisciplinary effort. Clim Change 100(1):119–124
Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus W, Shaw D (1994) The impact of global warming on agriculture: a Ricardian analysis. Am Econ Rev 84:753–771
Nhemachena C, Hassan R (2007) Determinants of climate adaptation strategies of African farmers: multinomial choice analysis. Draft report CEEPA, University of Pretoria
OECD (2002) Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2002: climate change: India’s perceptions, positions, policies and possibilities. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/16/1934784.pdf
Orindi VA, Eriksen S (2005) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in the development process in Uganda, vol 15, Ecopolicy Series. African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS), Nairobi
Ravi Shankar K, Nagasree K, Prasad MS, Venkateswarlu B (2013) Farmers’ knowledge perceptions and adaptation measures towards climate change in South India and Role of extension in climate change adaptation and mitigation. In: Compendium of national seminar on futuristic agricultural extension for livelihood improvement and sustainable development, ANGRAU Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 19–21 Jan 2013, pp 295–303
Reilly J, Schimmelpfennig D (1999) Agricultural impact assessment, vulnerability and scope for adaptation. Clim Change 43:745–788
Reilly J, Baethgen W, Chege FE, Van de Greijn SC, Ferda L, Iglesias A, Kenny C, Patterson D, Rogasik J, Rotter R, Rosenzweig C, Sombroek W, Westbrook J (1996) Agriculture in a changing climate: impacts and adaptations. In: Watson R, Zinyowera M, Moss R, Dokken D (eds) Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations, and mitigation of climate change: scientific and technical analyses. Cambridge University Press for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, pp 427–468
Rosenzweig C, Hillel D (1998) Climate change and the global harvest: potential impacts of the greenhouse effect on agriculture. Oxford University Press, New York
Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008a) A ricardian analysis of the impact of climate change on South American Farms. Chil J Agr Res 68(1):69–79
Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008b) Measuring impacts and adaptations to climate change: a structural ricardian model of African livestock management. Agr Econ 38(2):151–165
Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008c) An analysis of crop choice: adapting to climate change in Latin American Farms. Ecol Econ 67:109–116
Smit B, Skinner MW (2002) Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 7:85–114
Swanson D, Henry David V, Rust C, Medlock J (2008) Understanding adaptive policy mechanisms through farm-level studies of adaptation to weather events in Alberta, Canada. International Institute for Sustainable Development Canada, p 72
Vedwan N, Rhoades RE (2001) Climate change in the western Himalayas of India: a study of local perception and response. Climate Res 19:109–117
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Shankar, K.R., Nagasree, K., Nirmala, G., Prasad, M.S., Venkateswarlu, B., Rao, C.S. (2015). Climate Change and Agricultural Adaptation in South Asia. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1_50
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38669-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38670-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences