Abstract
The paper is concerned with the nature of the presuppositionality involved in “strong” (or presuppositional) indefinite noun phrases in general, and Turkish accusative marked indefinites in particular. It investigates the semantics of Turkish accusative indefinites with regard to the categories of existential import, contextual restrictedness (or D-linking) and semantic scope, within the DRT-based Binding Theory of presupposition justification. It argues that neither contextual restrictedness nor scope properties alone can account for the semantics of Turkish Acc-indefinites. It further argues that existential import, modeled as anaphoricity encoded in the semantics of Acc-indefinites, is fundamental to “strong” indefiniteness in Turkish and can be construed as the source of both contextual restrictedness and wide scope behavior.
I gratefully acknowledge the feedback I received from two anonymous reviewers, Varol Akman, Cem Bozşahin, Daniel Büring, Elizabeth Coppock, Jin Cui, Cornelia Ebert, Chiara Gianollo, Aslı Göksel, Klaus von Heusinger, Hans Kamp, Yiğit Karahanoğulları, Cem Keskin, Paul Kiparsky, Jaklin Kornfilt, Sebastian Löbner, Rick Nouwen, Duygu Özge, Arndt Riester, Maribel Romero, Ceyhan Temürcü, Ümit Turan, and Deniz Zeyrek, and the material support of the German Science Foundation by Project C2 “Case and Referential Context” under Sonderforschungsbereich 732 “Incremental Specification in Context” of University of Stuttgart.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Aygen-Tosun, G.: Specificity and subject-object positions/scope interactions in Turkish. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Turkic Linguistics at Manchester University (1999)
Diesing, M.: Indefinites. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Enç, M.: The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1–25 (1991)
Farkas, D.: Specificity distinctions. Journal of Semantics 19, 213–243 (2002)
von Fintel, K.: Evidence for presuppositional indefinites. MIT, Ms (1998)
van Geenhoven, V.: Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic. CSLI, Stanford (1998)
Geurts, B.: Presuppositions and Pronouns. CRiSPI, vol. 3, Elsevier, Oxford (1999)
Geurts, B.: Existential import. In: Comorovski, I., von Heusinger, K. (eds.) Existence: Semantics and Syntax, pp. 253–271. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
Heim, I.: The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachussetts, Amherst (1982)
Kamp, H.: A theory of truth and semantic representation. In: Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Truth, Interpretation, and Information, pp. 1–41. Foris, Dordrecht (1984)
Kamp, H., Bende-Farkas, A.: Epistemic specificity from a communication-theoretical perspective. Journal of Semantics (submitted)
Kelepir, M.: Topics in Turkish Syntax: Clausal Structure and Scope. Ph.D. thesis. MIT (2001)
Milsark, G.: Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–29 (1977)
Özge, U.: Turkish indefinites and accusative marking. In: Simpson, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, MITWPL #63, pp. 253–267. MITWPL, Cambridge (2011)
Pesetsky, D.: Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In: Reuland, E., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) The Representation of (In)definiteness, pp. 98–129. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)
van der Sandt, R.: Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9, 333–377 (1992)
Schwarzschild, R.: Singleton indefinites. Journal of Semantics 19, 289–314 (2002)
Szabolcsi, A.: Positive polarity–negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22, 409–452 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Özge, U. (2013). What Does It Mean for an Indefinite to Be Presuppositional?. In: Bezhanishvili, G., Löbner, S., Marra, V., Richter, F. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7758. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36976-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36976-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36975-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36976-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)