Abstract
In the monocentric model, commuting is viewed as a burden whose cost shapes the spatial structure of cities to a considerable extent. This view has been challenged by the finding that actual commuting patterns are far from efficient. However, this “wasteful” commuting is better interpreted as an indication of labor market frictions that are traded off against commuting frictions than as a neglect of commuting costs. Urban sprawl results from the decreasing importance of physical space that was the consequence of the automobile and is fundamentally consistent with the basic insights of the monocentric model. Large and diversified urban labor markets flourish when space restrictions are relaxed because this facilitates the matching of jobs and workers along other dimensions. Having a large mortgage puts more stress on this allocation mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson F, Haltiwanger J, Kutzbach M, Pollakowski H, Weinberg D (2011) Job displacement and the duration of joblessness: the role of spatial mismatch. Working paper, US census bureau
Costa D, Kahn ME (2000) Power couples: changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990. Quart J Econ 115(4):1287–1315
Decreuse B, van Ypersele T (2011) Housing market regulation and the demand for job protection. J Public Econ 95(11–12):1397–1409
Duranton G, Puga D (2001) Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation and the life- cycle of product. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1454–1477
Flatau P, Forbes M, Hendershott PH, Wood G (2003) Homeownership and unemployment; the roles of leverage and public housing. NBER working paper 10021
Gautier PA, Teulings CN (2003) An empirical index of labor market density. Rev Econ Stat 85(4):901–908
Gautier PA, Teulings CN (2009) Search and the city. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39(3):251–265
Gin A, Sonstelie J (1992) The streetcar and residential location in nineteenth century Philadelphia. J Urban Econ 32(1):92–107
Glaeser EL (1999) Learning in cities. J Urban Econ 46(2):254–277
Glaeser EL, Kahn ME (2004) Sprawl and Urban Growth. In: Hednerson JV, Thisse J-F (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4(56):2481–2528
Hamilton BW (1982) Wasteful commuting. J Polit Econ 90(5):1035–1053
Hamilton BW (1989) Wasteful commuting again. J Polit Econ 67:1497–1504
Kain JF (1968) Housing segregation, negro unemployment, and metropolitan decentralization. Quart J Econ 82(2):175–197
LeRoy S, Sonstelie J (1983) Paradise lost and regained: transportation, innovation, income and residential location. J Urban Econ 13(1):67–89
Lucas RE, Rossi-Hansberg E (2002) On the internal structure of cities. Econometrica 70(4):1445–1476
Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Macmillan, Houdmills
Munch JR, Rosholm M, Svarer M (2006) Are home owners really more unemployed? Econ J 116(514):991–1013
Nickell SJ, Layard R (1999) Labour market institutions and economic performance. In: Ashenfelter A, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol III. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3030–3084
Oswald AJ (1996) A conjecture on the explanation for high unemployment in the industrialized nations; Part I. Working paper, University of Warwick
Petrongolo B, Pissarides C (2001) Looking into the black box: a survey of the matching function. J Econ Lit 39(2):390–431
Phillips D (2011) Getting to work: experimental evidence on job search and transportation costs in Washington, DC. Working paper, Georgetown University
Pissarides C (2000) Equilibrium unemployment theory. MIT, Cambridge
Rouwendal J (1998) Search theory, spatial labor markets and commuting. J Urban Econ 43(1):1–22
Rouwendal J (1999) Spatial job search and commuting distances. Reg Sci Urban Econ 29(4):491–517
Rouwendal J, Nijkamp P (2004) Living in two worlds: a review of home-to-work decisions. Growth Change 35(3):287–303
Small KA, Song S (1992) “Wasteful” commuting: a resolution. J Polit Econ 100(4):888–898
Teulings CN, Gautier PA (2004) The right man for the job. Rev Econ Stud 71:553–580
Van den Berg GJ, Gorter C (1997) Job search and commuting time. J Bus Econ Stat 15(2):269–281
Van Ommeren J, van den Berg GJ, Gorter C (2000) Estimating the marginal willingness to pay for commuting. J Reg Sci 40(3):541–563
Van Vuuren A (2008) The relationship between expectations of labor market status, homeownership and the duration unemployment. Working paper, VU University
Wheaton WC (1977) Income and urban residence: an analysis of consumer demand for location. Am Econ Rev 67(4):620–631
White MJ (1988) Urban commuting journeys are not wasteful. J Polit Econ 96(5):1097–1110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix Computation of the Reservation Wage
Appendix Computation of the Reservation Wage
To see how the equilibrium can be found, start with the simple situation in which there is only one employment center (N = 1). When the wage offered there is high enough to let the net income at the searcher’s residential location exceed the unemployment benefit, the reservation wage will be lower than the net wage offered, and the searcher will always accept a job offer. When there are two or more employment centers, the optimal acceptance set can be determined by the following simple procedure: determine the subset of employment centers whose job offers imply a net wage at x that is at least equal to the unemployment benefit. If it is nonempty, start with an acceptance set that contains only the employment center that offers the highest net wage at x and compute a preliminary reservation wage from the above equation using this acceptance set. Compare this reservation wage with the highest net wage offered by a center that is not yet in the acceptance set. If this wage is higher than the preliminary reservation wage, add this center to the acceptance set. Recompute the reservation wage and repeat this procedure until no employment center fulfills the entrance condition or no employment centers with a net wage at x exceeding the unemployment benefit is left.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rouwendal, J. (2019). Commuting, Housing, and Labor Markets. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_11-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_11-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences