Abstract
The usability of mobile applications (apps) is an emerging area of research because of the increasing use of mobile devices around the world. App development is challenging because each application has its own purpose, and each individual user has different needs and expectations from the apps. There are various apps available for each purpose, and the success of the application depends on its usefulness. This paper presents a systematic review of some of the most contemporary apps and highlights their usability attributes. It discusses usability models, frameworks and guidelines outlined in previous research for designing apps with enhanced usability characteristics. Based on this research, comprehensive guidelines for mobile apps’ usability can then be provided.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
5.1 Introduction
The traditional usability guidelines used in desktop applications are not very much applicable to the apps [1]. App usability attributes are different; therefore, we need to specify usability attributes that are essential and important for apps [2]. The important usability attributes expected in any app are effectiveness, satisfaction, efficiency, learnability, errors and memorability as well as the quality characteristics outlined in ISO 9126 [3,4,5,6]. Some of the usability attributes may overlap in meaning but have been used with different names by different researchers.
Most of the guidelines are for usability testing, but most of them are not applicable to apps because mobile apps have unique features and changing context [1]. Furthermore, the work available does not have any consensus on the factors of usability. A recent study identified user, task and context as the main factors of usability [3]. However, the study was lacking due to certain limitations. The researchers found it hard to find the relevant papers, and it affected the results. The papers included were from 2008 to 2010 because smartphone apps had become popular during this period and there had not been much research done on mobile apps usability till that time. A review was conducted on usability characteristics of apps, but the work also lacked some of the recent developments in apps’ usability [7].
This article seeks to contribute to important research concerning the usability attributes of apps. The purpose of this research is to conduct a systematic review that reveals the most prominent and recent usability attributes that have been discussed and have emerged in the research. This study will be useful in building future guidelines for developing apps that have all the essential usability attributes. This work stands out because it discusses some of the most contemporary research.
5.2 The Systematic Review
We undertook a systematic review to search for published, peer-reviewed articles that investigated usability attributes in mobile apps. We utilised the terminology outlined in the table below (Table 5.1) to look for research papers covering usability attributes in mobile devices and applications. We sought to incorporate all the related terms that could provide us with articles relevant to this topic.
We referred to ACM Digital Library, EBSCO, IEEE Xplore, PsycINFO, Communication and Mass Media Complete, Computers and Applied Sciences Complete, ProQuest Computer Science Collection, Computer Source and Web of Science.
We tried to include the most recent articles starting from 2010, which were based on app usability. We have followed the methodology from [8], and the flow chart below shows how the systematic review was undertaken (Fig. 5.1).
5.3 Results
We conducted a systematic review of usability attributes in mobile apps. We looked for articles that discussed usability attributes in mobile devices and applications. We also conducted a comprehensive survey on usability of apps and tried to figure out the important attributes discussed in these papers. Eighteen relevant articles were included which have been published and peer reviewed (Table 5.2).
5.4 Results Evaluation
Figure 5.2 shows the mobile apps’ usability attributes. Satisfaction is the most highly mentioned amongst studies at ten times and then both effectiveness and efficiency at six times. Next, learnability was cited three times. Afterwards, simplicity, usefulness, errors, understandable and attractiveness were named two times. All the other attributes, such as memorability and cognitive load, were only cited once.
5.5 Conclusion
This review shows that usability in apps has been discussed from various points of view by many authors. Some studies provide guidelines for improving usability, whilst others compare usability attributes amongst different apps. Usability has been discussed from numerous angles between 2010 and 2016. Most of the work discussed in the beginning of the study involved research in lab settings; however more recent research usually took place in field settings. Earlier research was aimed at testing usability attributes in apps or emphasising the importance of certain attributes. Next, most researchers were interested in comparing different applications to test usability. Then, usability attributes have been evaluated for some practical apps, and there has been a focus on adding something new to these. Recent work has also included users’ acceptance and expert reviews as evaluating procedures for determining the usability of applications. Some of the recent work focuses specifically on improving usability in apps related to various fields ranging from health to social networking. Usability criteria are always evolving, and the needs of people are changing rapidly so new dimensions of usability have been discussed in some of the recent research. The attributes that are emerging in the new research are related to the ease of use of the application when performing multiple tasks, intuitiveness, security and power consumption. These attributes can be debated as being part of those defined in the traditional literature, but in apps, there is a need to mention them separately to emphasise their importance.
The evaluation of the results shows that satisfaction is the most highly mentioned amongst studies at ten times followed by both effectiveness and efficiency at six times.
This research shows that there are numerous usability attributes and it is difficult for designers to include them all into one app. The best they can do is improve the usability of the app by keeping its nature in mind. This research will be used to outline usability guidelines for developing applications with enhanced usability. This is only possible when the developer is aware of the attributes that enhance usability.
References
Zhang, D., & Adipat, B. (2005). Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction., 18(3), 293–308.
Gafni, R. (2009). Usability issues in mobile-wireless information systems. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6, 755–769.
Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: Literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science, 1(1), 1–16.
Popa, M. (2010). Audit process during projects for development of new mobile it applications. Informatica Economica, 14(3), 34.
Pocatilu, P., & Boja, C. (2009). Quality characteristics and metrics related to M-Learning process. Amfiteatru Economic, 11(26), 346–354.
Fleming, I. (2016). An overview of the ISO 9126-1 software quality model definition, with an explanation of the major characteristics, from http://www.sqa.net/iso9126.html
Rabi'u, S., Ayobami, A. S., & Hector, O. P. (2012). Usability characteristics of mobile applications. In Proceedings of international conference on behavioural & social science research (ICBSSR), Kampar, Malaysia. (Indexed by Thomson Reuters).
Alturki, R. M., & Gay, V. (2016). A systematic review on what features should be supported by fitness apps and wearables to help users overcome obesity. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5(9), 197–206.
Functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: A systematic review of the literature. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3(1), e20.
Kim, S., Lee, I., Lee, K., Jung, S., Park, J., Kim, Y. B., et al. (2010). Mobile web 2.0 with multi-display buttons. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 136–141.
Gebauer, J., Shaw, M. J., & Gribbins, M. L. (2010). Task-technology fit for mobile information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 25(3), 259–272.
Sonderegger, A., & Sauer, J. (2010). The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Applied Ergonomics, 41(3), 403–410.
Adipat, B., Zhang, D., & Zhou, L. (2011). The effects of tree-view based presentation adaptation on mobile web browsing. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 99–122.
Leung, R., McGrenere, J., & Graf, P. (2011). Age-related differences in the initial usability of mobile device icons. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(5), 629–642.
Kim, K., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2012). The relation between usability and product success in cell phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(10), 969–982.
Aryana, B., & Clemmensen, T. (2013). Mobile usability: Experiences from Iran and Turkey. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(4), 220–242.
Baharuddin, R., Singh, D., & Razali, R. (2013). Usability dimensions for mobile applications—A review. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5, 2225–2231.
Boja, C., Doinea, M., & Pocatilu, P. (2013). Impact of the security requirements on mobile applications usability. Academy of Economic Studies. Economy Informatics, 13(1), 64.
Hao, S., Li, D., Halfond, W. G., & Govindan, R. (2013). Estimating mobile application energy consumption using program analysis. In 2013 35th international conference on software engineering (ICSE) (pp. 92–101). IEEE.
O’Malley, G., Dowdall, G., Burls, A., Perry, I. J., & Curran, N. (2014). Exploring the usability of a mobile app for adolescent obesity management. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2(2), e29.
Al-Wakeel, L., Al-Ghanim, A., Al-Zeer, S., & Al-Nafjan, K. (2015). A usability evaluation of arabic mobile applications designed for children with special needs—Autism. Lecture Notes on Software Engineering, 3(3), 203.
Zapata, B. C., Fernández-Alemán, J. L., Idri, A., & Toval, A. (2015). Empirical studies on usability of mhealth apps: A systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Systems, 39(2), 1–19.
Wei, Q., Chang, Z., & Cheng, Q. (2015). Usability study of the mobile library app: An example from Chongqing university. Library Hi Tech, 33(3), 340–355.
Chintapalli, V. V., Tao, W., Meng, Z., Zhang, K., Kong, J., & Ge, Y. (2016). A comparative study of spreadsheet applications on mobile devices. Mobile Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9816152
Eraslan, E., İç, Y. T., & Yurdakul, M. (2016). A new usability evaluation approach for touch screen mobile devices. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 10(2–4), 186–219.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alturki, R., Gay, V. (2019). Usability Attributes for Mobile Applications: A Systematic Review. In: Jan, M., Khan, F., Alam, M. (eds) Recent Trends and Advances in Wireless and IoT-enabled Networks. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99966-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99966-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99965-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99966-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)