Abstract
Historically, indigenous psychology has been described as an offshoot of a paradigm shift in social science and psychology. This shift is hinged on providing space to people’s voices that are often denied in the positivist paradigm. It is paradoxical that rather than facilitating the centring of silenced voices, the focus of indigenous or cultural psychologists has often been on imagining a reified indigenous psychology through specific religious conceptions of self and society or collapsing indigenous psychologies with the larger framework of psychological sciences. In this chapter we: (1) examine how culture is defined within indigenous and cross-cultural psychology ; (2) provide a critique of mainstream indigenous psychology from within and outside this sub-discipline; and (3) analyze how a politically constituted indigenous psychology that utilizes narrative- and voice-based research approaches could address social justice issues and social problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berry, J. W., & Kim, U. (1993). The way ahead: From indigenous psychologies to a universal psychology. In U. Kim, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 277–280). London: Sage.
Berry, J. W., & Sam, D. (1997). Acculturation and adaptation. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Seagull, & C. Kagitçibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Social behavior and applications (Vol. 3, pp. 291–326). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bhatia, S. (2002). Orientalism in Euro-American and Indian psychology: Historical representation of ‘natives’ in colonial and postcolonial contexts. History of Psychology, 5, 376–398.
Bhatia, S. (2007). American karma: Race, culture, and identity in the Indian diaspora. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Bhatia, S. (2015). Entangled marginality and qualitative inquiry. Invited paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Qualitative Inquiry in Psychology, New York, NY.
Bhatia, S. (2018). Decolonizing psychology: Globalization, social justice, and Indian youth identities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bhatia, S., & Ram, A. (2009). Theorizing identity in transnational and diaspora: A critical approach to acculturation. International Journal for Intercultural Research, 33, 14–149.
Dalal, A. K., & Priya, K. R. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research. In K. R. Priya & A. K. Dalal (Eds.), Qualitative research on illness, wellbeing and self-growth: Contemporary Indian perspectives (pp. 1–22). New Delhi: Routledge.
Enriquez, V. G. (1977). Toward cross-cultural knowledge through cross-indigenous methods and perspectives. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 12, 9–16.
Enriquez, V. G. (1993). Developing a Filipino psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 152–169). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondworth: Penguin.
Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gergen, K. J. (1997). Social psychology as social construction: The emerging vision. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology (pp. 113–128). Oxford: Blackwell.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gudykunst, W., & Kim, Y. Y. (1997). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Hall, S. (1991). Old and new identities, old and new ethnicities. In A. D. King (Ed.), Culture, globalization, and the world-system: Contemporary conditions for the representation of identity (pp. 41–68). Binghamton, NY: State University of New York.
Hall, S. (1993). Culture, community, nation. Cultural Studies, 7, 349–363.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111–1120.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Indigenous psychologies: Asian perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 88–103.
Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jackson, J. (2000). What ought psychology to do? American Psychologist, 55(3), 328–330.
Jahoda, G. (2016). On the rise and decline of ‘indigenous psychology’. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 169–181.
Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (1993a). Introduction. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 1–29). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (1993b). Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. London: Sage.
Kim, U., & Park, Y. (2006). The scientific foundation of indigenous and cultural psychology: The transactional approach. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 27–48). New York: Springer.
Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (2006). Contributions to indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 3–25). New York: Springer.
Kruger, L., & Lourens, M. (2016). Motherhood and the “madness of hunger”: “…Want Almal Vra vir My vir ‘n Stukkie Brood” (“…Because everyone asks me for a little piece of bread”). Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 40, 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-015-9480-5.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1969). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). Los Angeles: Sage.
Lopez, H. I. F. (1996). White by law: The legal construction of race. New York: New York University Press.
Mays, V. M. (2000). A social justice agenda. American Psychologist, 55(3), 326–327.
Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Cartographies of struggle: Third world women and the politics of feminism. In C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 2–47). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Paredes-Canilao, N., & Babaran-Diaz, M. A. (2013). Sikolohiyang Pilipino: 50 years of critical-emancipatory social science in the Philippines. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10, 765–783.
Prashad, V. (2000). The karma of brown folk. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Priya, K. R. (2010). Research relationship as a facilitator of remoralization and self-growth: Postearthquake suffering and healing. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 479–495.
Priya, K. R. (2012). Social constructionist approach to suffering and healing: Juxtaposing Cassell, Gergen and Kleinman. Psychological Studies, 57, 211–223.
Priya, K. R. (2015). On the social constructionist approach to traumatized selves in post-disaster settings: State-induced violence in Nandigram, India. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 39(3), 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-014-9423-6.
Rangaswamy, P. (2000). Namaste America: Indian immigrants in an American metropolis. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Richards, P. (2014). The Global South and/in the Global North: Interdisciplinary investigations. The Global South, 8, 139–154.
Sampson, E. E. (1993). Identity politics: Challenges to psychology’s understanding. American Psychologist, 48, 1219–1230.
Segall, M. H., Lonner, W. J., & Berry, J. W. (1998). Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. American Psychologist, 53, 1101–1110.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London, UK: Zed books.
Sundararjan, L. (2015). Understanding emotion in Chinese culture: Thinking through psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
Tölöyan, K. (1996). Rethinking diaspora(s): Stateless power in the transnational moment. Diaspora, 5, 3–35.
Valisner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi, India: Sage.
van der Veer, P. (1992). Introduction: The diasporic imagination. In P. van der Veer (Ed.), Nation and migration: The politics of space in the South Asian diaspora (pp. 1–16). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Wallner, F. G., & Jandl, M. J. (2006). The importance of constructive realism for the indigenous psychologies approach. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 28–49). New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhatia, S., Priya, K.R. (2019). From Representing Culture to Fostering ‘Voice’: Toward a Critical Indigenous Psychology. In: Yeh, KH. (eds) Asian Indigenous Psychologies in the Global Context. Palgrave Studies in Indigenous Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96232-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96232-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96231-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96232-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)