Skip to main content

From Indigenous Psychologies to Cross-Indigenous Psychology—Prospects for a “Genuine, Global Human Psychology”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Psychology from Indigenous Perspectives

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Indigenous Psychology ((PASIP))

Abstract

This chapter looks at the critiques in the preceding section of this book in terms of three particular topics. The first section is on unpacking and strengthening IPs. I look at the meaning of IP, and of the term “indigenous.” I explain why Yang’s (1992) contention that Western psychology is the only true IP in the world is problematic. I propose that we use “indigenization” when we refer to how we try to make Western psychology indigenous, and “cultural validation” when we refer to the process of discovering (and articulating) what is genuinely indigenous. Both processes are valuable in developing IP. I then examine the challenges faced by IPs, and how these can be addressed. The second section is on cross-indigenization. I explain the difference between “cross-cultural” and “cross-indigenous,” and argue that cross-indigenization is the process by which Yang’s vision of global psychology can be realized. I then gave three examples/illustrations of cross-indigenous theorizing. The third section, on the prospects for a “genuine, balanced global human psychology,” looks at the challenges to be expected, and strategies that can be considered for advancing the agenda of such a psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    I have the table of contents of the 17 issues from 1993 to 2002 of this journal, translated to English, courtesy of Prof. Yang’s assistants at Chung Yuan University in 2009.

  2. 2.

    Interview of Rogelia Pe with Yang Kuo-Shu, 7 October 2009, Taiwan.

References

  • Adair, J. (2006). Creating indigenous psychologies. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology (pp. 467–485). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allwood, C. M. (2020, this volume). Yang’s global psychology and beyond. In L. Sundararajan, K.-K. Hwang, & K.-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allwood, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590544000013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andres, T. D. (1994). Dictionary of Filipino culture and values. Quezon City: Giraffe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azuma, H. (1984). Psychology in a non-Western country. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (2013). Global psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 43(4), 391–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (2002). Indigenization of psychology in the Philippines. International Journal of Psychology, 37(3), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, V. G. (1975). Mga batayan ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino sa kultura at kasaysayan (The bases of Filipino psychology in culture and history). General Education Journal, 29, 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, V. G. (1976). Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Perspektibo at direksyon [Filipino psychology: Perspectives and direction]. In L. F. Antonio, E. S. Reyes, R. E. Pe, & N. Almonte (Eds.), Ulat ng unang pambansang kumperensya sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino (pp. 221–243). Lunsod Quezon: Pambansang Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, V. G. (1977). Filipino psychology in the Third World. Quezon City: Philippine Psychology Research House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, V. G. (1978). Kapwa: A core concept in Filipino social psychology. Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 42(1–4), 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, V. G. (1987). Decolonizing the Filipino psyche: Impetus for the development of psychology in the Philippines. In G. H. Blowers & A. M. Turtle (Eds.), Psychology moving East: The status of Western psychology in Asia and Oceania (pp. 265–287). Boulder and London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, V. G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, V. G. (1994). Pagbabangong-dangal: Indigenous psychology and cultural empowerment. Quezon City: Akademya ng Kultura at Sikolohiyang Pilipino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnsteiner, M. R. (1961). Reciprocity in the lowland Philippines. IPC Papers No. 1. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K.-K. (1987). Face and favor: Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K.-K. (2012). Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K.-K. (2013). Indigenous psychology. In K. D. Keith (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 716–718). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K.-K. (2019). Culture-inclusive theories: An epistemological strategy. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K.-K. (2020, this volume). Philosophical reflection on Prof. K. S. Yang’s vision of global psychology and indigenous compatibility. In L. Sundararajan, K.-K. Hwang, & K.-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaut, C. (1961). Utang na loob: A system of contractual obligation among Tagalogs. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 17(3, Autumn), 256–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U. (1990). Indigenous psychology. In R. W. Brislin (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 143–160). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (1993). Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U., Yang, K. S., & Hwang, K. K. (2006). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M., & Hendricks, M. J. (2020, this volume). Psychology for the global 99%. In L. Sundararajan, K.-K. Hwang, & K.-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe-Pua, R. (1991). UP pioneers in indigenous Filipino psychology. In B. Aquino (Ed.), The university experience (pp. 152–164). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe-Pua, R. (2015). Indigenous psychology. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 788–794). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pe-Pua, R. (Ed.). (2018a). Handbuk ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino, bolyum 1: Perspektibo at metodolohiya (Handbook of Filipino psychology, volume 1: Perspectives and methodology). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe-Pua, R. (2018b). Unpacking the concept of loob: Towards developing culture-inclusive theories. In R. Pe-Pua (Ed.), Handbuk ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino, bolyum 1: Perspektibo at metodolohiya (Handbook of Filipino psychology, volume 1: Perspectives and methodology) (pp. 382–394). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe-Pua, R. (Ed.). (2019). Handbuk ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino, bolyum 2: Gamit (Handbook of Filipino psychology, volume 2: Application). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe-Pua, R., & Perfecto-Ramos, P. (2012). Philippines. In D. B. Baker (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of psychology: Global perspectives (pp. 395–411). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe-Pua, R., & Protacio-Marcelino, E. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickren, W. E. (2013). Indigenization. In K. D. Keith (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 698–699). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, C. (2008). Cultural psychology, cross-cultural psychology, and indigenous psychology. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, Z. A. (1991). Ang pantayong pananaw bilang diskursong pangkabihasnan. In V. Bautista & R. Pe-Pua (Eds.), Pilipinolohiya: Kasaysayan, Pilosopiya at Pananaliksik (pp. 46–72). Maynila: Kalikasan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, C. E. (1976). The language of food. In G. F. Cordero (Ed.), Culinary culture of the Philippines (pp. 133–139). Quezon City: Bancom Audiovision Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweder, R. A. (2020, this volume). The role of reason in cultural interpretation: Some Talmudic distinctions for indigenous and cultural psychology. In L. Sundararajan, K.-K. Hwang, & K.-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 129–169). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., & Afsin, B. (2020, this volume). The impossible conditions of the possibility of an alter-global psychology. In L. Sundararajan, K.-K. Hwang, & K.-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global Psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitnui, P., Pe-Pua, R., Nayak, A., Behar, R., Te Awekotuku, N., & Nikora, L. W. (2015). Postscript: Maintaining balance in research climates for indigenous academics. In R. E. Rinehart, E. Emerald, & R. Matamua (Eds.), Ethnographies in pan Pacific research: Tensions and positionings (pp. 267–282). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, S., & Ariizumi, Y. (2006). Close interpersonal relationships among Japanese: Amae as distinguished from attachment and dependence. In U. Kim, K-S. Yang, & K-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 163–174). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K.-S. (1995). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In T.-Y. Lin, W.-S. Tseng, & Y.-K. Ye (Eds.), Chinese societies and mental health (pp. 19–39). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K.-S. (1999). Towards an indigenous Chinese psychology: A selective review of methodological, theoretical, and empirical accomplishments. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 41(2), 181–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K.-S. (2000). Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K.-S. (2012). Indigenous psychology, Westernized psychology, and indigenized psychology: A non-Western psychologist’s view. Chang Gung Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K.-S., Hwang, K.-K., & Chung-Fang, Y. (Eds.). (2005). Chinese indigenized psychology (Vol. 1). Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K.-S., Hwang, K.-K., & Chung-Fang, Y. (Eds.). (2009). Chinese indigenized psychology (Vol. 2). Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, K.-H. (Ed.). (2019). Asian indigenous psychologies in the global context. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rogelia Pe-Pua .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pe-Pua, R. (2020). From Indigenous Psychologies to Cross-Indigenous Psychology—Prospects for a “Genuine, Global Human Psychology”. In: Sundararajan, L., Hwang, KK., Yeh, KH. (eds) Global Psychology from Indigenous Perspectives. Palgrave Studies in Indigenous Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35125-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35125-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35124-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35125-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics