Abstract
The presented study shows results of structural and kinematic analysis of a planar six-bar quick-return mechanism that is used in shaping and planing machines for transformation of rotational motion of a driving link into prismatic motion of an end-effector. Assur groups of the III and II classes have been separated out from a quick-return mechanism when different driving links have been chosen during a structural analysis. Kinematic analysis has been carried out by grapho-analytical method for the case when a four-bar Assur group is included. Finally, 3D model has been simulated and coordinates of distinguished points of movable links have been found in six positions of the mechanism depending on the rotation of a driving link. The obtained results can be used in kinetostatic and dynamic analysis of the quick-return mechanism. The findings of the study can also be used in a design of planning and shaping machines, in synthesis and analysis of novel planar mechanisms.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Various planar mechanisms and manipulators are widely used in different practical applications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Their synthesis and analysis are important tasks that allow improving different existing mechanisms, as well as creating new structures. It is well known that any mechanism is designed as a combination of one or several Assur groups with zero degree-of-freedom (DoF) and a driving link with mobility more than zero [10, 11]. A series connection of Assur groups into a kinematic chain of a mechanism does not change its overall mobility.
The simplest planar Assur group is a dyad, which includes two links with three one-DoF kinematic pairs. Totally five different types of dyads are known [12]. Various mechanisms can be created on their basis beginning with four-bar mechanisms [13, 14]. Four-bar Assur groups are the following by number of links after dyads. They are divided into III and IV class. Assur group of the III class is shown in Fig. 1a, it includes a three-paired link with three levers. Various planar mechanisms and manipulators are designed on the basis of this group [15,16,17,18]. Figure 1b shows a four-bar Assur group of the IV class, which includes a closed variable contour [19]. This group is used in designing of planar transport mechanisms, bolt insertion systems, mining machines and other technique.
Links of both Assur groups shown in Fig. 1a, b are connected only by rotational kinematic pairs. However, rotational pairs can be replaced with prismatic pairs. In this case, the mobility of these groups is not changed, it remains equaled zero. At the same time, it becomes possible to design novel mechanical systems on the basis of these groups for performing various technological operations. In the presented study turn to a mechanism that includes a four-bar Assur group of the III class with rotational and prismatic kinematic pairs. Discuss the kinematic scheme of this mechanism and carry out its structural analysis in Sect. 2.
2 Structural Analysis
Figure 2a shows a six-bar quick-return mechanism that includes crank 1, slide block 2, swing lever 3, rocker arm 4, slider 5 and fixed link 6. The number of DoF of this mechanism can be calculated in accordance with the Chebyshev’s formula written as follows
where W3—mobility, defining number of DoF of a planar kinematic chain with three imposed constraints, n—number of movable links of a mechanism, p5—numbers of one-DoF kinematic pairs [20, 21]. The quick-return mechanism shown in Fig. 2a includes n = 5 and p5 = 7. According to (1) its mobility equals one (W3 = 1). It means that to have predefined motions of slider 5, it needs to give an input motion to a single link. Such a motion is the rotational and applied to crank 1.
As crank 1 is the driving link in the mechanism, it is possible to separate out only one Assur group, which is a four-bar group of the III class with levers 2 (RP), 4 (RR) and 5 (PR) shown in Fig. 2b. If we chose another driving link, the class of Assur groups included in the mechanism changes. For example, with driving link 4 it is possible to separate out two dyads RRP (Fig. 2c), with driving link 5 we can separate out dyad RRR and RRP (Fig. 2d).
Structural analysis of the six-bar quick-return mechanism allows solving a further kinematic task. Its algorithm depends on the DoF of the investigated mechanism and included Assur groups.
3 Direct Kinematic Analysis
Turn to a kinematic analysis of the six-bar quick-return mechanism. We apply grapho-analytical method to determine directions and numerical values of velocities and accelerations of its links. Draw these diagrams for the position of the mechanism shown in Fig. 3a. Accept angular velocity of crank 1 is w1 = 60 min−1, the dimensions of the movable links are OA = 74 mm, BC = 104 mm, BD = 364 mm. Links 1 and 2 have identical velocity of point A (VA1 = VA2), which is calculated as VA = w1 · OA = 0.074 m/s. Draw vector pa = 74 mm at the velocity vector diagram shown in Fig. 3b. The scale of the velocity diagram is calculated as µV = VA/pa = 0.001 (m/s)/mm.
As the mechanism includes the three-bar Assur group shown in Fig. 2b, it needs to apply the method of Assur points to solve kinematic task. It is possible to find three Assur points in the mechanism. The first point is S1, which lies at the intersection of the perpendiculars to links 3 and 6 drawn through points A and D (Fig. 2a). The second point is S2, which lies at the intersection of the perpendicular to link 6 drawn through point D and an extension of link 4. The third point is S3, which lies at the intersection of the perpendicular to link 3 drawn through point A and an extension of link 4. We will use point S1. Turn to its velocity calculation. Velocity of point S1 is determined from the following system of equations.
Then we can define velocities of points B, A3 and D5 through equation systems (3–5).
Velocities of points D3 and D5 equal to each other (VD3 = VD5), because links 3 and 5 connect to each other by the rotational kinematic pair. Numerical values of velocities VS1, VB, VA3 and VD5 are determined by multiplication of vector lengths ps1, pb, pa3 and pd5 from the velocity diagram by its scale µV. Finally velocities equal: VS1 = 0.075 m/s, VB = 0.097 m/s, VA3 = 0.112 m/s, VD5 = 0.149 m/s.
Angular velocities of slide block 2 and swing lever 3 equal to each other (w2 = w3), because links 2 and 3 connect to each other by prismatic kinematic pair, their numerical values are w2 = w3 = 0.285 s−1. Angular velocity of rocker arm 4 equals 0.929 (w4 = 0.929 s−1). Angular velocity of slider 5 equals zero (w5 = 0).
Turn to the calculation of accelerations. Accept that crank 1 rotates with constant angular velocity (w1 = const). Then acceleration of point A equals aA = w 21 · OA = 0.074 m/s2. Draw vector πa, which describes acceleration of point A at the accelerator diagram shown in Fig. 3c. The scale of the accelerator diagram is calculated as µa = aA/πa = 0.001 (m/s2)/mm. Acceleration of point S1 is calculated from the following equation system
Accelerations of points B, A3 and D5 can be found from equation systems (7–9).
Accelerations of points D3 and D5 equal to each other (aD3 = aD5), because links 3 and 5 connect to each other by the rotational kinematic pair. Figure 3c provides accelerator vector diagram from which numerical values of accelerations aS1, aB, aA3 and aD5 are determined by multiplication of the vector lengths πs1, πb, πa3 and πd5 by diagram scale µa. Finally accelerations equal: aS1 = 0.052 m/s2, aB = 0.093 m/s2, aA3 = 0.036 m/s2, aD5 = 0.039 m/s2.
Angular accelerations of slide block 2 and swing lever 3 equal to each other (ε2 = ε3), because links 2 and 3 connect to each other by the prismatic kinematic pair, their numerical values are ε2 = ε3 = 0.332 s−2. Angular acceleration of rocker arm 4 equals 0.878 (ε4 = 0.878 s−2). Angular acceleration of slider 5 equals zero (ε5 = 0).
Note that points b, a3 and d5 (d3) are placed on one line at the velocity and acceleration diagrams. Such a placement is proved by Fig. 3a where points B, A and D are placed on one line (line BD). When driving link is 4 or 5, the kinematic analysis of quick-return mechanism is simplified as it is not necessary to find Assur points. In these cases the linkage includes only pair of dyads shown in Fig. 2c, d.
4 Simulation Development
Numerical analysis of the quick-return mechanism has been carried out for the position measurements of distinguished points of movable links and tracing their trajectories. Figure 4 presents 3D model of the quick-return mechanism with red-colored trajectories of points A3, B and D3(D5). These trajectories can be varied by using data from the kinematic analysis and changing of link lengths of the mechanism.
Table 1 provides coordinate variation of distinguished points A1(A2), A3, B and D3(D5) of the quick-return mechanism depending on the tilt angle of crank 1. The initial position of crank 1 is when it lies in the negative part of axis X, so the Y-coordinate equals zero. Next positions are set after each 60°. The data from Table 1 allows solving inverse kinematic problem, i.e. define parameters of the quick-return mechanism by desired law motion.
5 Conclusions
The presented study provides results of structural and kinematic analysis of the planar quick-return mechanism based on the four-bar Assur group of the III class. The structural analysis of the mechanism has allowed defining various Assur groups when different driving links were accepted. The kinematics analysis has been solved by grapho-analytical method for the case when a four-bar Assur group was included in the mechanism. CAD-supported 3D modeling has allowed detecting motion trajectories and numerical values of coordinates of all movable links. The data obtained from the structural analysis can be applied for synthesis of new planing mechanisms, quick-return systems and other types of planar linkages. Results of kinematic calculations can be used in kinetostatic and dynamic analysis of the quick-return mechanism.
References
Vasiliu A, Yannou B (2001) Dimensional synthesis of planar mechanisms using neural networks: application to path generator linkages. Mech Mach Theory 36(2):299–310
Nielsen J, Roth B (1999) Solving the input/output problem for planar mechanisms. J Mech Des 121(2):206–211
Glazunov V, Kheylo S (2016) Dynamics and control of planar, translational and spherical parallel manipulators. In: Zhang D, Wei B (eds) Dynamic balancing of mechanisms and synthesizing of parallel robots. Springer, Cham, pp 365–402
Liu Y, McPhee J (2004) Automated type synthesis of planar mechanisms using numeric optimization with genetic algorithms. J Mech Des 127(5):910–916
Glazunov V et al (2013) 3-DOF translational and rotational parallel manipulators. In: Viadero-Rueda F, Ceccarelli M (eds) EUCOMES 2012, 4th European conference on mechanism science. New trends in mechanism and machine science. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 199–207
Wu J et al (2006) Analysis and application of a 2-DOF planar parallel mechanism. J Mech Des 129(4):434–437
Laryushkin P et al (2014) Singularity analysis of 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator. In: Ceccarelli M, Glazunov V. (eds) ROMANSY 2014 XX CISM-IFToMM symposium on theory and practice of robots and manipulators, Moscow, 23–26 June 2014. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 22. Springer, Cham, pp 47–54
Monkova K et al (2011) Kinematic analysis of quick-return mechanism in three various approaches. Tech Gazette 18(2):295–299
Fung F, Lee Y (1997) Dynamic analysis of the flexible rod of quick-return mechanism with time-dependent coefficients by the finite element method. J Sound Vib 202(2):187–201
Dvornikov L (2008) K voprosu o klassifikacii ploskih grupp Assura (On the classification of planar Assur groups). Theory Mech Mach 2(6):18–25
Peisakh EE (2007) An algorithmic description of the structural synthesis of planar Assur groups. J Mach Manuf Reliab 6:3–14
Li S, Dai J (2008) Structure synthesis of single-driven metamorphic mechanisms based on the augmented Assur groups. J Mech Robot 4(3):031004
Barker C (1985) A complete classification of planar four-bar linkages. Mech Mach Theory 20(6):535–554
Uicker J, Pennock G Jr, Shigley J (2011) Theory of machines and mechanisms, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Arakelian V, Smith M (2008) Design of planar 3-DOF 3-RRR reactionless parallel manipulators. Mechatronics 18(10):601–606
Cha S-H, Lasky T, Velinsky S (2007) Singularity avoidance for the 3-RRR mechanism using kinematic redundancy. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Roma, Italy, 10–14 Apr 2007
Arsenault M, Boudreau R (2004) The synthesis of three-degree-of-freedom planar parallel mechanisms with revolute joints (3-RRR) for an optimal singularity-free workspace. J Field Robot 21(5):259–274
Wu J, Wang J, Wang L (2010) A comparison study of two planar 2-DOF parallel mechanisms: one with 2-RRR and the other with 3-RRR structures. Robotica 28(6):937–942
Dvornikov L (2004) O kinematicheskoj razreshimosti ploskoj chetyrehzvennoj gruppy Assura chetvertogo klassa grafo-analiticheskim metodom (On the kinematic solvability of the planar Assur group of the fourth class by grapho-analytical method). Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Mach Build 12:9–15
Fomin A, Dvornikov L, Paik J (2017) Calculation of the general number of imposed constraints of kinematic chains. J Proc Eng 206:1309–1315
Fomin A et al (2016) To the theory of mechanisms subfamilies. In: Proceedings of MEACS2015. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, 1–4 Dec 2015, vol 124, No 1, p 012055
Acknowledgements
The study has been carried out with the support of the Russian President Scholarship according to the research project SP-3755.2016.1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fomin, A., Olexenko, A. (2019). Study on Structure and Kinematics of Quick-Return Mechanism with Four-Bar Assur Group. In: Radionov, A., Kravchenko, O., Guzeev, V., Rozhdestvenskiy, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering. ICIE 2018. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95630-5_241
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95630-5_241
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95629-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95630-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)