Skip to main content

The Pupils and Accommodation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Albert and Jakobiec's Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a framework for understanding the afferent input from the retina which gives rise to the pupil light reflex, its integration within the midbrain, and its output which controls pupil size to each eye. The key features of the near reflex, which involves the coordination within the midbrain of accommodation, convergence, and pupillary constriction, are also provided. These reflexes are useful in clinical practice for assessing afferent input in retinal and optic nerve disorders and also in determining the cause of unequal pupils in patients with both benign and life-threatening disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowenstein O, Kawabata H, Loewenfeld I. The pupil as indicator of retinal activity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964;57:569–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Loewenfeld IE. The light reflex. In: The pupil: anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Ames/Detroit: Iowa State University Press/Wayne State University Press; 1993. p. 96–135.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levatin P. Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;62:768–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol. 1981;26:39–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson HS, Corbett JJ. Asymmetry of pupillomotor input. Eye. 1991;5:36–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox TA, Thompson HS, Hayreh SS, Snyder JE. Visual evoked potential and pupillary signs. A comparison in optic nerve disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:1603–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson HS, Montague P, Cox TA, Corbett JJ. The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93:681–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown RH, Zillis JD, Lynch MG, Sanborn GE. The afferent pupillary defect in asymmetric glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1540–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson LN, Hill RA, Bartholomew MJ. Correlation of afferent pupillary defect with visual field loss on automated perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:1649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kardon RH, Haupert C, Thompson HS. The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:351–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:622–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Long-term fluctuation of relative afferent pupillary defect in subjects with normal visual function. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:875–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bell RA, Waggoner PM, Boyd WM, et al. Clinical grading of relative afferent pupillary defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:938–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kardon RH. Anatomy and physiology of the pupil. Section III, the autonomic nervous system: pupillary function, accommodation, and lacrimation. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, editors. Walsh and Hoyt’s clinical neuro-ophthalmology. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1998. p. 847–98.

    Google Scholar 

  15. tenDoesschate J, Alpern M. Response of the pupil to steady state retinal illumination: contribution by cones. Science. 1965;149:989–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Duda M, Domagalik A, Orlowska-Feuer P, et al. Melanopsin: from a small molecule to brain functions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;113:190–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dacey DM, Liao HW, Peterson BB, et al. Melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in primate retina signal colour and irradiance and project to the LGN. Nature. 2005;433(7027):749–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barbur JL, Keenleyside MS, Thomson WD. Investigation of central visual processing by means of pupillometry. In: Kulikowski JJ, Dickinson CM, Murray IJ, editors. Seeing colour and contour. Oxford, UK: Pergamon; 1989. p. 431–51.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harms H. Grundlagen, methodik und bedeutung der pupillenperimetriefür die physiologie und pathologie des schorgans. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1949;149:1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cibis G, Campos E, Aulhorn E. Pupillary hemiakinesia in suprageniculate lesions. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93:1322–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilhelm BJ, Wilhelm H, Moro S, Barbur JL. Pupil response components: studies in patients with Parinaud’s syndrome. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 10):2296–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hellner KA, Jensen W, Muller A. Video processing pupillographic perimetry in hemianopsia. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1978;172:731–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alexandridis E, Krastel H, Reuther R. Disturbances of the pupil reflex associated with lesions of the upper visual pathway. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1979;209:199–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reuther R, Alexandridis E, Krastel H. Disturbances of the pupil reflex associated with cerebral infarction in the posterior cerebral artery territory. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr. 1981;229:249–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Narasaki S, Kawai K, Kubota S, Noguchi J. Video pupillographic perimetry and its clinical application. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1974;18:253–74.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kardon RH, Kirkali PA, Thompson HS. Automated pupil perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:485–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kardon RH. Pupil perimetry. In: Current opinion in ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Current Science; 1992. p. 565–70.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barbur JL, Harlow AJ, Sahraie A. Pupillary responses to stimulus structure, colour, and movement. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992;12:137–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Slooter JH, van Noren D. Visual acuity measured with pupil responses to checkerboard stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980;19:105–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ukai K. Spatial pattern as a stimulus to the pupillary system. J Opt Soc Am A. 1985;2:1094–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Barbur JL, Thomson WD. Pupil response as an objective measure of visual acuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7:425–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cocker KD, Moseley MJ. Visual acuity and the pupil grating response. Clin Vision Sci. 1992;7:143–6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Young RSL, Kennish J. Transient and sustained components of the pupil response evoked by achromatic spatial patterns. Vis Res. 1993;33:2239–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Binda P, Pereverzeva M, Murray SO. Pupil constrictions to photographs of the sun. J Vis. 2013;13(6):8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gamlin PDR, Clarke RJ. The pupillary light reflex pathway of the primate. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995;66:415–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gamlin PDR, Zhang H, Clarke RJ. Luminance neurons in the pretectalolivary nucleus mediate the pupillary light reflex in the rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res. 1995;106:177–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Loewenfeld IE. The reaction to near vision. In: The pupil: anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Ames/Detroit: Iowa State University Press/Wayne State University Press; 1993. p. 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Loewenfeld IE. Reactions to darkness. In: The pupil: anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Ames/Detroit: Iowa State University Press/Wayne State University Press; 1993. p. 274–94.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Loewenfeld IE. Reflex dilation. In: The pupil: anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Ames/Detroit: Iowa State University Press/Wayne State University Press; 1993. p. 318–94.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fison PN, Garlick DJ, Smith SE. Assessment of unilateral afferent pupillary defects by pupillography. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979;63:195–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cox TA. Pupillography of a relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:320–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cox TA. Pupillographic characteristics of simulated relative afferent pupillary defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:1127–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lam BL, Thompson HS. The prevalence of simple anisocoria. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;104:69–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kardon RH, Denison CE, Brown CK, Thompson HS. Critical evaluation of the cocaine test in the diagnosis of Horner’s syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:384–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bremner F. Apraclonidine is better than cocaine for detection of Horner syndrome. Front Neurol. 2019;10:55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Weinstein JM, Zweifel TJ, Thompson HS. Congenital Horner’s syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1074–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Thompson HS, Newsome DA, Loewenfeld IE. The fixed dilated pupil: sudden iridoplegia or mydriatic drops? A simple diagnostic test. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;86:21–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kardon RH, Corbett JJ, Thompson HS. Segmental denervation and reinnervation of the iris sphincter as shown by infrared videographic transillumination. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:313–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Weinstein JM. Anatomy and physiology of accommodation. Section III, the autonomic nervous system: pupillary function, accommodation, and lacrimation. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, editors. Walsh and Hoyt’s clinical neuro-ophthalmology. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1998. p. 899–915.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randy Kardon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kardon, R. (2021). The Pupils and Accommodation. In: Albert, D., Miller, J., Azar, D., Young, L.H. (eds) Albert and Jakobiec's Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90495-5_52-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90495-5_52-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90495-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90495-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics