Abstract
Radiata pine ( Pinus radiata D. Don) is one of the most widely planted exotic pine species in rainfall environments of the Southern hemisphere (Yan et al. 2006). Its fast growth has stimulated an exhaustive study of wood production, and the development of breeding programs (Espinel et al. 1995; Codesido and Fernández-López 2009). Although utility of in vitro organogenesis has been proven for clonal propagation of this species (Aitken-Christie et al. 1985), a limitation of this method is the high cost of the process for mass production commercially.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Radiata pine ( Pinus radiata D. Don) is one of the most widely planted exotic pine species in rainfall environments of the Southern hemisphere (Yan et al. 2006). Its fast growth has stimulated an exhaustive study of wood production, and the development of breeding programs (Espinel et al. 1995; Codesido and Fernández-López 2009). Although utility of in vitro organogenesis has been proven for clonal propagation of this species (Aitken-Christie et al. 1985), a limitation of this method is the high cost of the process for mass production commercially. Other systems to achieve in vitro propagation of Pinus radiata adult trees have been developed (Montalbán et al. 2013), but changes in the attributes of resulting plants have sometimes been observed and rejuvenation of the material has been transitory under in vitro conditions. Somatic embryogenesis (SE) has been the most important development for plant tissue culture , not only for mass propagation but also for enabling the implementation of biotechnological tools that can be used to increase the productivity and wood quality of plantation forestry . Therefore, many efforts have been made in the last years to develop and optimize SE systems that can be used in the breeding programs.
Somatic embryogenesis in P. radiata was first described by Smith et al. (1994) followed by improved protocols of different aspects of SE such as initiation (Hargreaves et al. 2009; Montalbán et al. 2012), maturation (Montalbán et al. 2010), cryopreservation (Hargreaves et al. 2002) and expression of genes (Aquea and Arce-Johnson 2008; García-Mendiguren et al. 2015). Modifications of the tissue culture media are likely to influence the success of SE initiation (Montalbán et al. 2012). However, few studies have focused on the impact of temperature (Kvaalen and Johnsen 2007). It is known that modifications in water availability, either by solute-imposed water stress or by physical restriction, will impact the development of embryonal masses (EMs) (Klimaszewska et al. 2000). Although the effect of different concentrations of gellan gum at maturation has been studied (Teyssier et al. 2011; Morel et al. 2014), the combination of different temperatures and water availability has not been previously tested at the initial stages of SE in conifers. As reviewed by Von Aderkas and Bonga (2000) and Neilson et al. (2010), it is clear that stress has the potential to induce or improve embryogenesis in species that have been considered recalcitrant.
Long periods of proliferation of the EMs can produce losses by contamination, somaclonal variation, or a decrease in their ability to generate embryos together with the high maintenance costs (Breton et al. 2006). One way to overcome this bottleneck is the cryopreservation of EMs; EMs are kept in liquid nitrogen because these low temperatures induce the synthesis of proteins that favours the conservation and subsequent viability of the EMs (Kong and von Aderkas 2011). However, this method presents some drawbacks such as: it is a complex technique comprising several stages (Gale et al. 2007); – it is an expensive process from the economic and technical point of view (Bomal and Tremblay 2000); it is necessary the presence of cryoprotectants that prevent the formation of ice crystals (Salaj et al. 2012); the most popular cryoprotectant is DMSO but is toxic (Arakawa et al. 1990) and may be the cause of genetic and epigenetic changes in tissues (Krajnakova et al. 2011). Nowadays, efficient and reproducible protocols for EMs cryopreservation have been described in Pinaceae (Lelu-Walter et al. 2008). However, cryopreservation of somatic embryos (Se) has been achieved for periods less than one month (Barra-Jiménez et al. 2015) in Quercus species, which does not guarantee long-term storage . Preliminary studies on P. radiata and other conifers (Hargreaves et al. 2004; Kong and Von Aderkas 2011), suggest that it is possible to develop simple alternative cryopreservation of Se at low temperatures maintaining their viability in the future.
An improved protocol for initiation of EMs, proliferation , somatic embryo maturation and germination as well as low temperature Se storage are presented in this chapter. Furthermore, recent studies focused on SE optimization in Pinus radiata are shown.
2 Initiation of Embryogenic Tissue
Cone collection and embryo stage assessment
One-year-old green female cones , enclosing immature zygotic embryos of Pinus radiata at the precotyledonary stage (Montalbán et al. 2012), are collected and stored at 4 °C until processing. Cones are usually processed within one week, although they can be stored for more than one month with no detriment in SE initiation rates (Montalbán et al. 2015).
Seed sterilization
Intact cones are sprayed with 70% (v/v) ethanol, split into quarters and all immature seeds dissected. Then, immature seeds are surface sterilized in H2O2 10% (v/v) plus two drops of Tween 20® for 8 min and then rinsed three times under sterile distilled H2O in sterile conditions in the laminar flow unit. Seed coats are removed and whole megagametophytes containing immature embryos are excised out aseptically and placed horizontally onto the medium (Fig. 1).
Basal medium preparation
Initiation of embryogenic tissue is usually carried out on EDM basal medium (Walter et al. 2005, Table 1) at 23 °C. The initiation medium contains 30 g L−1 sucrose, 4.5 µM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 2.7 µM benzyladenine (BA) and 3 g L−1 gelrite®. The pH is adjusted to 5.7, and the medium is sterilized at 121 °C for 20 min. After autoclaving, filter-sterilized solutions (pH 5.7) of the following amino acids are added to partially cooled medium prior to dispensing into Petri dishes (90 × 9 × 20 mm): 550 mg L−1 L-glutamine, 525 mg L−1 asparagine, 175 mg L−1 arginine, 19.75 mg L−1 L-citrulline, 19 mg L−1 L-ornithine, 13.75 mg L−1 L-lysine, 10 mg L−1 L-alanine and 8.75 mg L−1 L-proline.
Culture conditions and incubations period
Cultures were maintained in the dark at 22 ± 1 °C for 4–8 weeks.
3 Embryonal Masses Evaluation
After 4–8 weeks on initiation medium, the number of initiated embryonal masses (3–5 mm in diameter) per Petri dish are evaluated.
4 Embryogenic Tissue Proliferation
Proliferating tissues are separated from the megagametophytes and subcultured to proliferation medium every 2 weeks. Initiation and proliferation medium only differ in the concentration of Gelrite®, being 3 g L−1 for the first and 4.5 g L−1 for the second. Following four periods of subculturing, actively growing embryogenic tissues are recorded as established cell lines (ECLs). Proliferation is carried out in darkness.
5 Somatic Embryo Maturation
The EMs are suspended in EDM (Table 1) broth (lacking growth regulators) and shaken vigorously by hand for several seconds. A 5 mL aliquot containing 80–90 mg of embryonal fresh mass is transferred to filter paper (Whatman no.2) in a Büchner funnel. A vacuum is applied for 10 s, and the filter paper with the attached tissue is transferred to maturation medium (Montalbán et al. 2010). The maturation medium contained the salt formulation of EDM (Table 1), 9 g L−1 gellan gum , 60 µM abscisic acid , 60 g L−1 sucrose and the amino acid mixture used for the initiation and maintenance of the EMs. Maturation is carried out in darkness.
6 Somatic Embryo Germination
After 15 weeks, Se (Fig. 2) are transferred to germination medium. This medium contains half-strength macronutrients LPm (Quoirin and Lepoivre 1977, as modified by Aitken-Christie et al. 1988) (Table 1) with 2 g L−1 of activated charcoal and 9.5 Difco agar. Petri dishes are tilted at a 45º angle with embryonic root caps pointing downwards and incubated under dim light for 7 days. Cultures are then maintained at a 16-h photoperiod at 100 µmol m−2 s−1 using cool white fluorescent tubes (TFL 58 W/33; Philips, France). Plantlets (Fig. 3) are subcultured onto fresh germination medium every 6 weeks. The whole in vitro SE process is carried out at 23 °C.
7 Somatic Plantlet Acclimatization
After 14–16 weeks on the germination medium, the plantlets are transferred to sterile peat:perlite (2:1) and acclimatized in a greenhouse where the humidity is progressively decreased from 99 to 70% during the first month.
8 Abiotic Stress: A Way to Improve the Somatic Embryogenesis Process
In order to evaluate the effect of different physical and chemical conditions on radiata pine SE and to identify what initial stage of SE has the greatest impact on the success of embryogenesis , initiation was carried out in following the same methodology described in Sect. 2. Different concentrations of gellan gum were added prior to autoclaving to increase or reduce water availability in the medium (2, 3 or 4 g L−1 Gelrite®), and the explants were stored at 18, 23 or 28 °C (Fig. 4). In summary, nine different treatments were applied.
Statistically significant differences in the percentage of initiation among temperatures and gellan gum concentrations were found (García-Mendiguren et al. 2016).
When considering temperature alone, initiation percentages in explants induced at 28 °C were significantly lower (4%) than those induced at 18 or 23 °C (17–13%, respectively). With respect to gellan gum , megagametophytes cultured on medium containing 4 g L−1 gellan gum showed significantly higher initiation (16%) in comparison to those cultured at 2 and 3 g L−1), which showed initiation values of 9% and 10%, respectively.
At the proliferation stage, statistically significant differences were identified only between temperatures (28 °C resulted in a significantly higher proliferation percentage (65%) when compared to explants initiated at 18 and 23 °C (35%). Regarding the number of Se per gram of EM, statistically significant differences were observed among initiation temperatures. ECLs initiated at 28 °C produced a significantly higher number of Se (486 Se g−1 EM) than those initiated at 23 °C (319 Se g−1 EM) (García-Mendiguren et al. 2016). Our results suggest that the initial conditions of the process positively impact the number of embryos produced several months later. Temperature presumably exerts a selective pressure in the early stages of embryogenesis and results in lower initiation rates but higher rates of proliferation and maturation (Fehér 2015). Although the different gellan gum concentrations tested show significant differences in water availability, this did not induce significant differences in the number of Se produced.
In summary, we observe a marked effect of initiation conditions on Se production, showing differences when that conditions are applied several months before. In light of the conclusions obtained in this study, initiation at 18 °C and 4 g L−1 gellan gum can be used to enhance the number of ECLs and thus enhance diversity within clonal plantations. On the other hand, incubation at 28 °C and the addition of 2 g L−1 gellan gum at initiation increase the efficiency of the process and result in a larger number of clones from a selected cross in a genetic improvement program.
9 New Methods for Storing Pinus radiata Genetic Resources
P. radiata Se are placed onto a sterile Whatman filter (nº 2) and the filter laid on Petri dishes containing EDM (Table 1) (Walter et al. 2005) supplemented with 60 g L−1 sucrose and 9 g L−1 Gelrite®; after autoclaving the amino acid mixture of the EDM medium (Table 1) is added. The Petri dishes are sealed with parafilm and can be stored at 4 °C for 1 year (Fig. 5). The percentage of germination is not affected by storage, improving the rates obtained in Se not conserved in cold (85%) (Fig. 6).
10 Research Prospects
Forestry productivity can be increased via the planting of high-value trees. Clonal propagation by somatic embryogenesis has the ability to enhance this amplification process and capture the benefits of breeding programs (Pullman et al. 2005) and it should be implemented with other technologies as cryopreservation of the embryonal masses (Park 2002) and/or somatic embryos . Our future researches activities are focused on corroborate the following hypotheses:
-
Extreme environmental conditions during the early stages of somatic embryogenesis in Pinus spp. determine the adaptative characteristics of the somatic plants produced.
-
The adaptive characteristics of the somatic plants of P. radiata are translated into differences in biochemical, molecular and physiological quantifiable characteristics, which could be used as early indicators of stress tolerance.
-
The EMs and Se of P. radiata can be stored at 4, −20 and −80 °C minimizing the costs and use of cryoprotectans.
References
Aitken-Christie J, Singh AP, Davies H (1988) Multiplication of meristematic tissue: a new tissue culture system for radiata pine. In: Hanover JW, Keathley DE (eds) Genetic manipulation of woody plants. Plenum Publishing Corp, New York, pp 413–432
Aitken-Christie J, Singh AP, Horgan KJ, Thorpe T (1985) Explant developmental state and shoot formation in Pinus radiata cotyledons. Bot Gaz 146:190–203
Aquea F, Arce-Johnson P (2008) Identification of genes expressed during early somatic embryogenesis in Pinus radiata. Plant Physiol Biochem 46(5–6):559–568
Arakawa T, Carpenter JF, Kita YA, Crowe JH (1990) The basis for toxicity of certain cryoprotectans-a hypothesis. Cryobiol 27:401–415
Barra-Jiménez A, Aronen TS, Alegre J, Toribio M (2015) Cryopreservation of embryogenic tissues from mature holm oak trees. Cryobiol 70(3):217–225
Bomal C, Tremblay FM (2000) Dried cryopreserved somatic embryos of two Picea species provide suitable material for direct plantlet regeneration and germplasm storage. Ann Bot 86:177–183
Breton D, Harvengt L, Trontin JF, Bouvet A, Favre JM (2006) Long-term subculture randomly affects morphology and subsequent maturation of early somatic embryos in maritime pine. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 87:95–108
Codesido V, Fernández-López J (2009) Juvenile radiata pine clonal seed orchard management in Galicia (NW Spain). Eur J For Res 133(1):177–190
Espinel S, Aragonés A, Ritter E (1995) Performance of different provenances and of the local-population of the Monterrey pine (Pinus radiata D.-Don) in Northern Spain. Ann Sci For 52(5):515–519
Fehér A (2015) Somatic embryogenesis—stress-induced remodeling of plant cell fate. Biochim Biophys Acta 1849:385–402
Gale S, John A, Benson EE (2007) Cryopreservation of Picea sitchensis (sitka spruce) embryogenic suspensor masses. Cryo Lett. 28:225–239
García-Mendiguren O, Montalbán IA, Goicoa T, Ugarte MD, Moncaleán P (2016) Environmental conditions at the initial stages of Pinus radiata somatic embryogenesis affect the production of somatic embryos. Trees-Struct Funct 30(3):949–958
García-Mendiguren O, Montalbán IA, Stewart D, Klimaszewska K, Moncaleán P, Rutledge B (2015) Gene expression profiling of shoot-derived calli from adult radiata pine and zygotic embryo-derived embryonal masses. PLoS ONE 10–6:1–19
Hargreaves CL, Grace LJ, Holden DG (2002) Nurse culture for efficient recovery of cryopreserved Pinus radiata D. Don embryogenic cell lines. Plant Cell Rep 21:40–45
Hargreaves C, Grace L, van der Mass S, Reeves C, Holden G, Menzies M, Kumar S, Foggo M (2004) Cryopreservation of Pinus radiata zygotic embryo cotyledons: effect of storage duration on adventitious shoot formation and plant growth after 2 years in the field. Can J For Res 34(3):600–608
Hargreaves CL, Reeves CB, Find JI, Gough K, Josekutty P, Skudder DB, Van der Maas SA, Sigley MR, Menzies MI, Low CB, Mullin TJ (2009) Improving initiation, genotype capture, and family representation in somatic embryogenesis of Pinus radiata by a combination of zygotic embryo maturity, media, and explant preparation. Can J For Res 39:1566–1574
Krajnakova J, Sutela S, Aronen T, Gomory D, Vianello A, Haggman H (2011) Long-term cryopreservation of Greek fir embryogenic cell lines: Recovery, maturation and genetic fidelity. Cryobiol 63:17–25
Klimaszewska K, Bernier-Cardou M, Cyr DR, Sutton BCS (2000) Influence of gelling agents on culture medium gel strength, water availability, tissue water potential, and maturation response in embryogenic cultures of Pinus strobus L. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36:279–286
Kong L, von Aderkas P (2011) A novel method of cryopreservation without a cryoprotectant for immature somatic embryos of conifer. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 206(1):115–125
Kvaalen H, Johnsen O (2007) Timing of bud set in Picea abies is regulated by a memory of temperature during zygotic and somatic embryogenesis. New Phytol 177:49–59
Lelu-Walter MA, Bernier-Cardou M, Klimaszewska K (2008) Clonal plant production from self- and cross-pollinated seed families of Pinus sylvestris (L.) through somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 92:31–45
Montalbán IA, De Diego N, Moncaleán P (2010) Bottlenecks in Pinus radiata somatic embryogenesis: improving maturation and germination. Trees-Struct Funct 24:1061–1071
Montalbán IA, De Diego N, Moncaleán P (2012) Enhancing initiation and proliferation in radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) somatic embryogenesis through seed family screening, zygotic embryo staging and media adjustments. Acta Physiol Plant 34:451–460
Montalbán IA, Novák O, Rolčik J, Strnad M, Moncaleán P (2013) Endogenous cytokinin and auxin profiles during in vitro organogenesis from vegetative buds of Pinus radiata adult trees. Physiol Plant 148:214–231
Montalbán IA, García-Mendiguren O, Goicoa T, Ugarte MD, Moncaleán P (2015) Cold storage of initial plant material affects positively somatic embryogenesis in Pinus radiata. New Forest 46:309–317
Morel A, Teyssier C, Trontin J-F, Eliášová K, Pešek B, Beaufour M, Morabito D, Boizot N, Le Metté C, Belal-Bessai L, Reymond I, Harvengt L, Cadene M, Corbineau F, Vágner M, Label P, Lelu- Walter M-A (2014) Early molecular events involved in Pinus pinaster Ait. somatic embryo development under reduced water availability: transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Physiol Plant 152:184–201
Neilson KA, Gammulla CG, Mirzaei M, Imin N, Haynes PA (2010) Proteomic analysis of temperature stress in plants. Proteomics 10:828–845
Park YS (2002) Implementation of conifer somatic embryogenesis in clonal forestry: technical requirements and deployment considerations. Ann Forest Sci 59:651–656
Pullman GS, Gupta PK, Timmis R, Carpenter C, Kreitinger M, Welty E (2005) Improved Norway spruce somatic embryo development through the use of abscisic acid combined with activated carbon. Plant Cell Rep 24(5):271–279
Quoirin M, Lepoivre P (1977) Études des milieux adaptés aux cultures in vitro de Prunus. Acta Hort 78:437–442
Salaj T, Matusíková I, Swennen R, Panis B, Salaj J (2012) Long-term maintenance of Pinus nigra embryogenic cultures through cryopreservation. Acta Physiol Plant 34:227–233
Smith DR, Walter C, Warr AA, Hargreaves CL, Grace LJ (1994) Somatic embryogenesis joins the plantation forestry revolution in New Zealand. In: Biological sciences symposium, TAPPI Proceedings, Minneapolis, USA, pp 19–29
Teyssier C, Grondin C, Bonhomme L, Lomenech AM, Vallance M, Morabito D, Label P, Lelu-Walter MA (2011) Increased gelling agent concentration promotes somatic embryo maturation in hybrid larch (Larix X eurolepsis): a 2-DE proteomic analysis. Physiol Plant 141:152–165
Von Aderkas P, Bonga JM (2000) Influencing micropropagation and somatic embryogenesis in mature trees by manipulation of phase change, stress and culture environment. Tree Physiol 20:921–928
Walter C, Find JI, Grace LJ (2005) Somatic embryogenesis and genetic transformation in Pinus radiata. In: Jain SM, Gupta PK (eds), Protocol for somatic embryogenesis in woody plants. Forestry sciences, vol 77. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 491–504
Yan H, Bi HQ, Li RW, Eldridge R, Wu ZX, Li Y, Simpson J (2006) Assessing climatic suitability of Pinus radiata (D. Don) for summer rainfall environment of southwest China. Forest Ecol Manag 234(1–3):199–208
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by MINECO (Spanish Government) project (AGL2013-4700-C4-2R; AGL2016-76143-C4-3R) and DECO (Basque Government). Thanks to CYTED (Programa iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el desarrollo) for founding BIOALI net and make possible the establishment of successful international collaborations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montalbán, I.A., Moncaleán, P. (2018). Pinus radiata (D. Don) Somatic Embryogenesis. In: Jain, S., Gupta, P. (eds) Step Wise Protocols for Somatic Embryogenesis of Important Woody Plants. Forestry Sciences, vol 84. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89483-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89483-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89482-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89483-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)