Skip to main content

Traditional Management and Diversity of Opuntia: General Panorama in Mexico and a Case Study in the Meridional Central Plateau

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Ethnobotany of the Mountain Regions of Mexico

Abstract

This chapter shows a general panorama of the biocultural importance of the Opuntia genus in Mexico, and a case study directed to illustrate more specifically such relevance. The case study was conducted in one of the regions of Mexico where the highest diversity of species and ethnovarieties of Opuntia occur, and where this variation has been strongly rooted in the regional cultures. The Opuntia genus comprises more than 200 species, numerous intraspecific taxa and even more ethnovarieties of cactus pears. It is native to the Americas, with a wide distribution in arid and semiarid lands through subpolar, temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions, from Canada to Patagonia. At least 84 species and numerous intraspecific taxa have been recorded to occur in Mexico; nearly 50 of them are used by different human cultures, and about 15 are cultivated, showing signs of domestication. Nowadays, some Mexican prickly pears like O. ficus-indica, O. streptacantha, O. robusta, O. cochenillifera, and O. auberi are cultivated throughout the world due to their economic and cultural values as food, ornaments, fodder, health-promoting benefits, as main host plant of cochineal, and for multiple other uses and applications. Some species were introduced to the Old World after the European colonization of the Americas and currently are invasive in areas of Australia, Asia, Africa, and Europe, causing severe ecological and economic problems. Since pre-Columbian times, the cactus pear species played agroecological roles in different regions of the Americas. In Mexico, these plants have been used since prehistory by native peoples and currently are important sources of livelihood, outstandingly human food. Fruits and young tender stems of practically all species, and flower buds of some of them, are edible. Their fruits are consumed fresh, and these and other edible parts are prepared in multiple ways in the Mexican cuisine, contributing to diet-nutritious components like amino acids, vitamins, proteins, minerals, dietary fibers, betalains, and phenolic compounds. The young tender cladodes are very much appreciated as vegetables in Mexican cuisine with dozens of recipes developed through history. The mature cladodes are also used to feed livestock; when dried, these are used as firewood. Their easy vegetative propagation and fast growth make Opuntia plants favorable for their cultivation, their use in borders of terraces against soil erosion, as live fences, and as main crops in intensive and extensive plantations. Due to their crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) and water use efficiency, Opuntia spp. provide ecological benefits for recovering and improving degraded lands, landscapes rehabilitation, biodiversity preservation, and prevention of desertification. The case study reported in this chapter was conducted in the Meridional Central Plateau of Mexico, a region historically inhabited by different Chichimec Indigenous peoples, which developed a remarkable cultural history of interactions with prickly pears since pre-Columbian times. Then, after the European conquest, peoples of the region maintained traditional use and developed innovations associated with new socio-ecological contexts, strongly influenced by livestock raising and modern agriculture intensification. The study area is a remaining of the cultural region called “Tunal Grande” or “Gran Tunal,” because of the abundance of forests dominated by Opuntia spp. The name “Tunal” derives from the word tuna, of Caribbean origin but adopted in Spanish to refer to fruits of these plants. The case study documented the local classification of varieties and species of Opuntia, their uses, and management forms in the community of Laguna de Guadalupe in the state of Guanajuato. There, we identified 30 traditional varieties of 10 Opuntia species managed in two main environmental units: the monte (patches of thorn-scrub and secondary forests) and home gardens. In the monte, people let standing phenotypes of species and varieties that are more valued because of their attributes; in addition, they carry out practices that promote the abundance of these favorable species and varieties. In home gardens, people cultivate the most appreciated species and varieties and practice more intensively human selection that guides processes of domestication. We documented the different uses of species and varieties of Opuntia, their economic importance for local people, and their historical and current role as components of the biocultural diversity. We finally discuss the main cultural and economic factors influencing contemporary changes in the local landscape and human culture, and the socio-ecological perspectives for conserving the important biocultural heritage related to Opuntia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albuquerque UP, da Cunha LVFC, De Lucena RFP, Alves RRN, editors. Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. New York: Springer; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaya-Pérez MA, Bautista-Zane R. El nopal forrajero en México: del siglo XVI al siglo XX. Agric Soc Desarrollo. 2008;5(2):167–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arba M, Falisse A, Choukrallah R, Sindic M. Biology, flowering, and fruiting of the cactus Opuntia spp.: a review and some observations on three varieties in Morocco. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2017;60:e17160568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros C, Buenrostro I. El maravilloso nopal: sus propiedades alimenticias y curativas. Grijalbo, Mexico City, Mexico; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaro GL, Bonvegna L, Donno D, Mellano MG, Cerutti AK, Nieddu G, Chessa I, Bounous G. Opuntia spp. biodiversity conservation and utilization on the Cape Verde Islands. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2015;62:21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavides-Ríos EC. Patrones de sensibilidad de las cactáceas ante el cambio climático en la Peníncula de Baja California, México (Master in science dissertation). La Paz: Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S. C.; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F. Implementing ecosystem-based management: evolution or revolution? Fish Fish. 2012;13(4):465–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl. 2000;10(5):1251–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blancas J, Casas A, Rangel-Landa S, Torres I, Pérez-Negrón E, Solís L, Moreno AI, Delgado A, Parra F, Arellanes Y, Caballero J, Cortés L, Lira R, Dávila P. Plant management in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley. Econ Bot. 2010;64(4):287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blancas J, Casas A, Pérez-Salicrup D, Caballero J, Vega E. Ecological and sociocultural factors influencing plant management in Náhuatl communities of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Branniff-Cornejo B. La región septentrional mesoamericana. In: Rojas Rabiela T, Murra JV, editors. Historia general de América Latina. Vol. I: Las sociedades originarias. Madrid: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura; 1999. p. 229–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Hollis H. Las cactáceas de México, vol. 1. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso M, Curró S, Las Casas G, La Malfa S, Gentile A. Microsatellite markers help to assess genetic diversity among Opuntia ficus indica cultivated genotypes and their relation with related species. Plant Syst Evol. 2010;290:85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A. Silvicultura y domesticación de plantas en Mesoamérica. In: Rendón B, Rebollar S, Caballero J, Martínez MA, Pérez MA, editors. Plantas, cultura y sociedad. Estudio sobre la relación entre seres humanos y plantas en los albores del Siglo XXI. México City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa/SEMARNAP; 2001. p. 123–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A. Uso y Manejo de Cactáceas Columnares Mesoamericanas. CONABIO. Biodiversitas. 2002;40:18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Barbera G. Chapter 9. Mesoamerican domestication and diffusion of cacti. In: Nobel PS, editor. Cacti: biology and uses. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 2002. p. 143–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Vázquez MC, Viveros JL, Caballero J. Plant management among the Nahua and the Mixtec of the Balsas River Basin: an ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Hum Ecol. 1996;24(4):455–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Caballero J, Mapes C, Zárate S. Manejo de la vegetación, domesticación de plantas y origen de la agricultura en Mesoamérica. Bol Soc Bot Méx (Bot Sci). 1997;61:31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Caballero J, Valiente-Banuet A. Use, management and domestication of columnar cacti in south-central Mexico: a historical perspective. J Ethnobiol. 1999;19(1):71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Valiente-Banuet A, Viveros JL, Dávila P, Lira R, Caballero J, Cortés L, Rodríguez-Arévalo I. Plant resources of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2001;55(1):129–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Otero-Arnaiz A, Pérez-Negrón E, Valiente-Banuet A. In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Ann Bot. 2007;100(5):1101–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Blancas JJ, Pérez Negrón E, Torres García I, Vallejo Ramos M, Rangel Landa S, Farfán-Heredia B. Manejo sustentable de recursos naturales: naturaleza y cultura. In: Arias G, Hernández F, Zurita-Zafra M, Uranga López ML, editors. Sustentabilidad e interculturalidad Paradigmas entre la relación cultura y naturaleza. Pátzcuaro: Universidad Intercultural Indígena de Michoacán; 2014. p. 10–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chahdoura H, Barreira JCM, Barros L, Santos-Buelga C, Ferreira ICFR, Achour L. Phytochemical characterization and antioxidant activity of the cladodes of Opuntia macrorhiza (Engelm.) and Opuntia microdasys (Lehm.). Food Funct. 2014;5(9):2129–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chávez-Moreno CK, Tecante A, Casas A. The Opuntia (Cactacea) and Dactylopius (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in Mexico: a historical perspective of use, interaction and distribution. Biodivers Conserv. 2009;18:3337–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colunga P. Variación morfológica, manejo agrícola y grados de domesticación de Opuntia spp. en el Bajío guanajuatense (Master thesis). Texcoco: Colegio de Postgraduados Montecillos; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colunga-García Marín P, Hernández-Xolocotzi E, Castillo A. Variación morfológica, manejo agrícola y grados de domesticación de Opuntia spp. en el Bajío Guanajuatense. Agrociencia. 1986;65:7–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornejo-Denman A, Arreola-Nava H. Usos actuales y potenciales de las cactáceas de Jalisco. XIX Semana de la Investigación Científica. Avances en la Investigación Científica del CUCBA, Zapopan; 2008. p. 201–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávila-Aranda P, Rodríguez-Arévalo I, García-Rojas L, Lecona-Rodríguez A. Ethnobotany and ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources in México. In: Lira R, Casas A, Blancas JJ, editors. Ethnobotany of Mexico. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 475–89.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Del Castillo RF. Composición y estructura de una nopalera bajo situaciones contrastantes de exposición de ladera y herbivoría. Bol Soc Bot Méx (Bot Sci). 2000;65:5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard DM, Simons GF, Fennig CD, editors. Ethnologue: languages of the world. 24th ed. Dallas: SIL International; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farfán B, Casas A, García-Frapolli E, Moreno-Calles AI, Castilleja A. Ethnoecology of the interchange of wild and weedy plants and mushrooms in Phurépecha markets of Mexico: economic motives of biotic resources management. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(5):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felger R, Moser MB. People of the desert and sea. Ethnobotany of the Seri Indians. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Figueredo-Urbina CJ, Álvarez-Ríos GD, García-Montes MA, Octavio-Aguilar P. Morphological and genetic diversity of traditional varieties of agave in Hidalgo State, Mexico. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0254376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery KV. Guilá Naquitz. New York: Academic Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Flores JL, Yeaton RI. La importancia de la competencia en la organización de las comunidades vegetales en el Altiplano Mexicano. Interciencia. 2000;25(8):365–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Flores JL, Yeaton RI. The replacement of arborescent cactus species along a climatic gradient in the southern Chihuahuan Desert: competitive hierarchies and response to freezing temperatures. J Arid Environ. 2003;55(4):583–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glimn-Lacy J, Kaufman PB. Botany illustrated: introduction to plants, major groups, flowering plant families. New York: Springer; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Espinosa M. Interacciones entre fenología, elementos bióticos y disturbio por pastoreo en las nopaleras del centro de México. In: Aguirre-Rivera JR, Reyes Agüero JA, editors. Memoria del VIII congreso nacional y VI internacional sobre el conocimiento y aprovechamiento del nopal. San Luis Potosí: Instituto de Investigación de Zonas Desérticas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí; 1999. p. 342–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith MP. Experimental hybridization in northern Chihuahuan desert region Opuntia. Aliso. 2001;20:37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith MP. The origins of an important cactus crop, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence. Am J Bot. 2004;91(11):1915–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán U, Arias S, Dávila P. Catálogo de cactáceas mexicanas. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Comisión Nacional para el conocimiento y uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO); 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Xolocotzi E. Aspects of plant domestication in Mexico: a personal view. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J, editors. Biological diversity of Mexico. Origins and distribution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 733–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuzé V, Tran G. Prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica). In: Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ, Rome; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illoldi-Rangel P, Ciarleglio M, Sheinvar L, Linaje M, Sánchez-Cordero V, Sarkar S. Opuntia in México: identifying priority areas for conserving biodiversity in a multi-use landscape. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur M, Kaur A, Sharma R. Pharmacological actions of Opuntia ficus indica: a review. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2012;2(7):15–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konings A, Konings G. Cacti of Texas in their natural habitat. Austin: Cichlid Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Singh D, Singh RS. Cactus pear: cultivation and uses. Bikaner: ICAR–Central Institute for Arid Horticulture Bikaner; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labra M, Grassi F, Bardini M, Imazio S, Guiggi A, Citterio S, Banf E, Sgorbati S. Genetic relationships in Opuntia Mill. genus (Cactaceae) detected by molecular marker. Plant Sci. 2003;165(5):1129–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS. A summary of the subsistence. In: Byers D, editor. The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley. Volume 1. Environment and subsistence. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967. p. 290–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS. The origins of agriculture and settled life. London: University of Oklahoma Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez M. Catálogo de nombres vulgares y científicos de plantas mexicanas. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-González CR, Gallegos-Vázquez C, Scheinvar L. Re-evaluation of Opuntia matudae (Cactaceae). Phytotaxa. 2019;423(3):158–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design. An interactive approach. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazri MA. Cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) breeding. In: Al-Khayri J, Jain S, Johnson D, editors. Advances in plant breeding strategies: fruits. New York: Springer; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercado-Muñoz F. Diversidad y sistemática del género Opuntia s. s., en la región de Los cabos, Baja California Sur, México (Master in sciences dissertation). La Paz: Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Velázquez, M. Caracterización, ordenación y clasificación numérica en nopal (Opuntia spp.) mediante atributos morfológicos y físco-químicos (Master in sciences dissertation). Marín: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro A, Cheia VM, Vasconcelos T, Moreira I. Management of the invasive species Opuntia stricta in a Botanical Reserve in Portugal. Weed Res. 2005;45(3):193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nava-Martínez LH. La Triada del Semidesierto. Rev Chicomoztoc. 2019;1(2):146–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nefzaoui A, Ben Salem H. Cacti: efficient tool for rangeland rehabilitation, drought mitigation and to combat desertification. Acta Hortic. 2002;581:295–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nefzaoui A, Louhaichi M, Ben SH. Cactus as a tool to mitigate drought and to combat desertification. J Arid Land Stud. 2014;24:121–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda-Linares CI, Vallejo M, Lappe-Oliveras P, Casas A. Traditional management of microorganisms in fermented beverages from cactus fruits in Mexico: an ethnobiological approach. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda-Linares CI, Álvarez-Ríos GD, Figueredo-Urbina CJ, Islas LA, Lappe-Oliveras P, Nabhan GP, Casas A. Traditional fermented beverages of Mexico: a biocultural unseen foodscape. Foods. 2021;10(10):2390.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Guillaume F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin P, O’Hara R, Simpson G, Solymos P, Stevens H, Szöcs E, Wagner H. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. Ordination methods, diversity analysis and other functions for community and vegetation ecologists, version 2.4-3; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palevitch D, Earon G, Levin I. Treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy with Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller. J Herbs Spices Med Plants. 1993;2:45–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareek O, Singh R, Vashishtha B. Performance of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.) clones in hot arid region of India. J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev. 2003;5:121–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paz-Navarro A. Nohpalli: El nopal tunero. Manejo Tradicional de Opuntia spp. (Cactaceae) en la localidad de Laguna de Guadalupe, Guanajuato (Bachelor dissertation). Morelia: Licenciatura en Ciencias Ambientales, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington C. The Tepehuan of Chihuahua: their material culture. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo-Espinoza JM, Aguirre-Mancilla CL, Jiménez-Alvarado R, Raya-Pérez JC, Iturriaga G, Ramírez-Pimentel JG, Hernández-Fuentes AD. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity evolution during the ripening process of 12 Opuntia spp. fruit accessions. Emir J Food Agric. 2017;29:138–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell AM, Weedin JF. Cacti of the Trans-Pecos and adjacent areas. Austin: Texas Tech University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prat L, Franck N. Morphology and anatomy of Platyopuntiae. In: Inglese P, Mondragon C, Nefzaoui A, Sáenz C, editors. Crop ecology, cultivation and uses of cactus pear. Rome: FAO; 2017. p. 21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangel-Landa S, Casas A, Rivera-Lozoya E, Torres I, Vallejo M. Ixcatec ethnoecology: biocultural principles of plant management in Oaxaca, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016;12:30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Agüero JA. Variación morfológica de Opuntia (Cactaceae) y la relación con su domesticación en la Altiplanicie Meridional de México (Doctoral dissertation). México City: Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR. Agrobiodiversity of cactus pear (Opuntia, Cactaceae) in the Meridional Highlands Plateau of Mexico. J Nat Resour Dev. 2011;1:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Agüero JA, Vallejo M. Matorral crasicaule. In: La biodiversidad en San Luis Potosí, vol. II. Mexico City: Secretaría de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental de San Luis Potosí, Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO); 2019. p. 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Agüero JA, González-Medrano F, García-Pérez JD. Flora vascular de la Sierra Monte Grande, municipio de Charcas, San Luis Potosí, México. Bol Soc Bot Méx. 1996;58:31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Hernández HM. Systematic notes and a detailed description of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. (Cactaceae). Agrociencia. 2005a;39:395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Flores-Flores JL. Variación morfológica de Opuntia (Cactaceae) en relación con su domesticación en la Altiplanicie Meridional de México. Interciencia. 2005b;30(8):476–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Valiente-Banuet A. Reproductive biology of Opuntia: a review. J Arid Environ. 2006;64:549–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Carlín-Castelán F, González-Durán A. Cátalogo de las principales variantes silvestres y cultivadas de Opuntia en la Altipanicie Meridional de México (no. 634.7750216 C3); 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Villanueva JA, Riojas-López ME, Mellink E. The Tunal Grande and associated tuna groves. Habitat of hunter gatherers. Rev Col San Luis. 2020;9(19):151–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J. Relaciones geográficas y posibles orígenes de la flora de México. Bot Sci. 1965;29:121–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J. Vegetación de México. Mexico City: Limusa; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J. Diversity and origins of the phanerogamic flora of Mexico. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J, editors. Biological diversity of Mexico. Origins and distribution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 129–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáenz C. Chapter 7. Industrial production of non-food products. In: Agro-industrial utilization of cactus pear. FAO Rural Infrastructure and Agro-Industries Division, in collaboration with the International Technical Cooperation Network on Cactus (FAO-CACTUSNET). Rome: FAO; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samah S, De Teodoro Pardo CV, Serrato-Cruz MA, Valadez-Moctezuma E. Genetic diversity, genotype discrimination, and population structure of Mexican Opuntia sp., determined by SSR markers. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2016;34:146–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Mejorada H. Mexico’s problems and programmes monitoring trade in common and endangered cacti. Cactus Succul J Great Brit. 1982;44(2):36–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinvar L. Opuntia albicarpa Scheivar una nueva especie para la ciencia del estado de México. Rev Jardín Bot Nacl. 1999;20:267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinvar L, Gallegos C. Estado del conocimiento de las especies del nopal (Opuntia spp.) productoras de xoconostles silvestres y cultivadas. Informe final. Mexico City: UNAM-CONABIO; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinvar L, Olalde G, Sule D. Especies silvestres de nopales mexicanos, proyecto no. GE005. Informe final. México City: Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, SNIB-CONABIO, Universidad Nacional; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton RT, Witt ABR, Piroris FM, van Wilgen BW. Distribution and socio-ecological impacts of the invasive alien cactus Opuntia stricta in eastern Africa. Biol Invasions. 2017;19:2427–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazinia R, Rahimi VB, Kehkhaie VR, Sahebkar A, Rakhshandeh H, Askari VR. Opuntia dillenii: a forgotten plant with promising pharmacological properties. Journal of Pharmacopunct. 2019;22(1):16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith E. Plant remains. In: Byers D, editor. The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley. Volume 1. Environment and subsistence. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967. p. 220–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JJ, Borgatti SP. Salience counts and so does accuracy: correcting and updating a measure for free-list-item salience. J Linguist Anthropol. 1997;7:208–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soberón J, Golubov J, Sarukhán J. The importance of Opuntia in Mexico and routes of invasion and impact of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Fla Entomol. 2001;84(4):486–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesfay YB, Kreyling J. The invasive Opuntia ficus-indica homogenizes native plant species compositions in the highlands of Eritrea. Biol Invasions. 2021;23:433–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM, Barrera-Bassols N. La memoria biocultural: la importancia ecológica de las sabidurías tradicionales. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM, Ordóñez MJ. The biodiversity scenario of Mexico: a review of terrestrial habitats. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J, editors. Biological diversity of Mexico. Origins and distribution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 757–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valadez-Moctezuma E, Samah S, Luna-Paez A. Genetic diversity of Opuntia spp. varieties assessed by classical marker tools (RAPD and ISSR). Plant Syst Evol. 2015;301:737–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiente-Banuet A, Casas A, Pickersgill B, Caballero J. Ethnobotany and domestication in Xoconochtli Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae), in the Tehuacán Valley and La Mixteca, Baja México. Econ Bot. 1997;52:279–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velásquez-Milla D, Casas A, Torres-Guevara J, Cruz-Soriano A. Ecological and socio-cultural factors influencing in situ conservation of crop diversity by traditional Andean households in Peru. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7(1):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Felker P, Paterson A, Mizrahi Y, Nerd A, Mondragon-Jacobo C. Cross hybridization and seed germination in Opuntia species. J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev. 1996;1:49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahia EM, Saenz C. Cactus pear (Opuntia species). In: Yahia EM, editor. Postharvest biology and technology of tropical and subtropical fruits. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2011. p. 290–331.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, UNAM, and the CONACYT, Mexico, for financial support of postgraduate studies. Moreover, to CONACYT, research project A1-S-14306 and CONABIO RG023 for financial support of the field and technical work. We mainly thank the locals of Laguna de Guadalupe for all the support and the maintenance of several Opuntia species.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Casas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Paz-Navarro, A., Ojeda-Linares, C.I., Álvarez-Ríos, G.D., Vallejo, M., Casas, A. (2022). Traditional Management and Diversity of Opuntia: General Panorama in Mexico and a Case Study in the Meridional Central Plateau. In: Casas, A., Blancas Vázquez, J.J. (eds) Ethnobotany of the Mountain Regions of Mexico. Ethnobotany of Mountain Regions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77089-5_21-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77089-5_21-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77089-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77089-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics