Abstract
How states view their role in protecting and promoting the welfare of their citizens is in a constant state of flux. Increasingly nationalistic rhetoric in some places, ‘deep state’ conspiracy theories in others and the rise of individualism all over the globe present new challenges to the rationale for and fabric of the welfare state. Alongside this, global challenges of climate change, rising inequality and related mass migration present renewed imperatives to reconsider ideas of global solidarity and global welfare. At the same time, in many ‘developed countries’ persistent societal problems confront virtually all governments, accompanied by seemingly inexorable budgetary pressures, not least those arising from pressure to maintain expanded and expensive welfare systems. It is the latter that is considered to have significantly influenced the emergence of the concept of the ‘enabling state. This chapter explores the idea of the enabling state but does so from the perspective of public administration, the machinery of the state. In particular, it suggests that public administration systems, the machinery that keeps states functioning, themselves must be enabled so that they can genuinely enable others to address poverty, social exclusion and inequality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberbach, J. (2003). Administration in an era of change. Governance, 16(3), 315–319.
American Political Science Association. (2004). American democracy in an age of rising inequality. Washington, DC: APSA.
Berghman, J. (1995). Social exclusion in Europe: Policy context and analytical framework. In G. Room (Ed.), Beyond the threshold: The measurement and analysis of social exclusion. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Blaug, R., Horner, L., & Lekhi, R. (2006). Public value, politics and public management: A literature review. London: The Work Foundation.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional Public Administration and the new Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.
Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Christensen, T., & Leigreid, P. (2007). Transcending new public management: The transformation of public sector reforms. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Cooke, G., & Muir, R. (2012). The possibilities and politics of the relational state. The relational state: How recognising the importance of human relationships could revolutionise the role of the state. London: IPPR.
Crook, R. C., & Sverrisson, A.S. (2001). Decentralisation and poverty alleviation in developing countries: a comparative analysis or, is West Bengal unique? Working Paper No. 130. Brighton: IDS.
Curtis, D. (2006). Mind sets and methods: Poverty strategies and the awkward potential of the enabling state. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(2), 150–164.
Earles, W., & Moon, J. (2000). Pathways to the Enabling State: Changing modes of social provision in Western Australian community services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(4), 11–24.
Elvidge, J. (2012). The Enabling State: A discussion paper. Dunfermline: Carnegie UK Trust.
Elvidge, J. (2014). A route map to an Enabling State. Dunfermline: Carnegie UK Trust.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Evans, K. J. (2000). Reclaiming John Dewey: Democracy, inquiry, pragmatism and public management. Administration and Society, 32(3), 308–328.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80.
Gilbert, N. (2013). Citizenship in the enabling state: The changing balance of rights and obligations. In A. Evers & A. Guillemard (Eds.), Social policy and citizenship: The changing landscape. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gilbert, N., & Gilbert, B. (1989). The enabling state: Modern welfare capitalism in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hornbein, R., & Simrell King, C. (2012). Should we be teaching public participation? Student responses and MPA program practices. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(4), 717–737.
Kellis, D. S., & Ran, B. (2012). Modern leadership principles for public administration: Time to move forward. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(1), 130–141.
Levitas, R. (2004). Let’s hear it for Humpty: Social exclusion, the third way and cultural capital. Cultural Trends, 13(50), 41–56.
Liddle, J. (2010). Twenty-first-century public leadership within complex governance systems: Some reflections. Policy and Politics, 38(4), 657–663.
Lyhne, I., Nielsen, H., & Bjørn Aaen, S. (2016). What determines the substantive influence of public participation? An investigation of planners’ views on conditions for participatory practices in Denmark. Planning Practice and Research, 31(3), 311–326.
McGrath, N., Armstrong, R., & Marinova, D. (2004). Participatory development for regional sustainability in Western Australia: An enabling state? Local Environment, 9(6), 561–574.
McInerney, C., & Finn, C. (2015). Caring at what cost? Rebuilding and refinancing the community and voluntary sector. Dublin: Impact.
McInerney, C., & Finn, C. (2016). Leadership challenges in civic engagement. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. New York: Springer.
Michalski, W., Miller, R., & Stevens, B. (2001). Governance in the 21st century: Power in the global knowledge economy and society. Paris: OECD.
Morse, R. S. (2008). Developing public leaders in an age of collaborative governance. In R. S. Morse & T. F. Buss (Eds.), Innovations in public leadership development. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Morse, R. S. (2010). Integrative public leadership: Catalyzing collaboration to create public value. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 231–245.
Moyson, S., Raaphorst, N., Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2017). Organizational socialization in public administration research. The American Review of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507401769616.
Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.
Offe, C. (2006). Political institutions and social power. In I. Shapiro, S. Skowronek, & D. Galvin (Eds.), Rethinking political institutions: The art of the State. New York and London: New York University Press.
Oldfield, K. (2003). Social class and public Administration: A closed question opens. Administration & Society, 35(4), 438–461.
Pearce, N. (2012). Under pressure: The drivers of a new centre-left statecraft. In C. Graeme & M. Rick (Eds.), The Relational State: How recognising the importance of human relationships could revolutionise the role of the state. London: IPPR.
Pollit, C. (1995). Management techniques for the public sector: Pulpit and practice. In B. G. Peters & D. J. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in a changing environment. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W., & Wanna, J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the Platonic Guardians. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 406–421.
Ricard, L. M., Klijn, E. H., Lewis, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2016). Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: A comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Management Review, 19, 1–23.
Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2002). Governance and public policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, M. (2008). Hybrid States: Globalisation and the politics of state capacity. Political Studies, 56, 566–583.
Shaw, R. (2012). Another size fits all? Public value management and challenges for institutional design. Public Management Review, 15(4), 477–500.
Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133(5-6), 531–578.
Sorensen, E. (1997). Democracy and empowerment. Public Administration, 75, 553–567.
Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.
Sun, P. Y. T., & Anderson, M. H. (2012). Civic capacity: Building on transformational leadership to explain successful integrative public leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 309–323.
Svara, J. H. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176–183.
Taylor, I. (2000). New Labour and the enabling state. Health & Social Care in the Community, 8(6), 372.
Van der Meer, F. (2009). Public sector reform and the rise of the enabling state: An approach to analysis. In R. Mathur (Ed.), Glimpses of civil service reform (pp. 171–195). Hyderabad: Idfai Press.
Van Thiel, S. (2011). Comparing agencification in Central Eastern European and Western European Countries: Fundamentally alike in unimportant respects. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 7(Special Issue), 15–32.
Wallace, J. (2013). The rise of the Enabling State: A review of policy evidence across the UK and Ireland. Dunfermline: Carnegie UK Trust.
Wampler, B. (2008). When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil. Comparative Politics, 41(1), 61–81.
Whiteford, G. E. (2003). Enhancing occupational opportunities in communities: Politics’ third way and the concept of the Enabling State. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(1), 40–45.
Williams, I., & Shearer, H. (2011). Appraising public value: Past, present and futures. Public Administration, 89(4), 1367–1384.
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McInerney, C. (2018). The Ghost in the Machine: Enabling Public Administration for an Enabling State. In: Ní Shé, É., Burton, L., Danaher, P. (eds) Social Capital and Enterprise in the Modern State. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68115-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68115-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68114-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68115-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)