Abstract
Since the first description of the cultivated peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. by Linneaus in 1753, to the recent monograph on the taxonomy of genus Arachis (Krapovickas and Gregory in Bonplandia 8(1–4):1–186, 1994; Krapovickas and Gregory in Bonplandia 16(Supl.):1–205, 2007), our knowledge of the genetic structure of the genus including its origin, variability, and geographical distribution of various species has significantly improved. Large germplasm collections have been accumulated in several countries to preserve the genetic diversity and characterize the germplasm resources for efficient utilization in peanut improvement programs. Plant growth and development including the origin and botanical classification of the cultivated species have been revisited here to summarize our current knowledge of the taxon. In spite of these advances, taxonomic and phylogenetic ambiguities still exist. It is likely that the recent advances in peanut genome sequencing and the availability of new and additional molecular markers and other genomic tools might help clarify the genetic structure of genus Arachis and of the cultivated species, A. hypogaea.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
3.1 Introduction
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), is an important grain legume crop and is primarily valued as a source of protein as well as fat to human nutrition. The seeds contain about 20–25% protein and 45–55% oil, in addition to useful vitamins and minerals, and offer an easily affordable source of protein for many, particularly in the developing countries. Of the 81 described species, A. hypogaea, is the only domesticated species and is cultivated for its seeds for human consumption, although a few other species have been reported to have uses for nutrition, forage and ornamental value (Krapovickas and Gregory 1994, 2007; Gimenes et al. 2000; Simpson et al. 2001; Galgaro et al. 1997; Stalker and Simpson 1995). Arachis hypogaea is a herbaceous annual with plants of about a 45–60 cm tall and 30 cm wide with a deep taproot. The roots typically contain the nitrogen fixing bacterial nodules of Rhizobium, which coexist in a symbiotic relationship by providing the necessary nitrogen for plant growth while deriving sustenance from it. The plants are self-fertilizing and have a unique mode of reproduction where flowers are produced on the plant and following fertilization, the gynoecium enters the soil through formation of a peg. Then, pods containing the seeds are produced underground. All species in the genus produce underground pods and in a sense are “pegged” to the ground as mentioned in Krapovickas and Gregory (1994, 2007). Because of this unique reproductive feature, peanut is also known as groundnut in many parts of the world.
3.1.1 Origin and Distribution of Genus Arachis
Arachis is a native South American genus with natural populations found growing in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay (Valls et al. 1985). The genus likely originated in the highlands of southwestern Mato Grosso do Sul state in Brazil (Hammons 1973; Gregory et al. 1980; Simpson et al. 2001) where the most ancient, trifoliate species, A. guaranitica Chodat. and Hassl., and A. tuberosa Bong. Ex Benth. were collected. Arachis guaranitica is the most genetically isolated species and looks more like a grass plant. These two species are still found growing in this region (Simpson et al. 2001). Subsequently, with water movement, the species spread to drier lowlands in all directions and evolved into various river valleys and drainage systems (Gregory and Gregory 1979; Stalker and Simpson 1995; Simpson et al. 2001) with Arachis species growing in sandy to heavy clay/loamy soils and on schist rocks with no soil (Simpson et al. 2001). One of the species, A. burkartii Handro was collected in southern Brazil in black gummy clay mixed with small stones with a soil pH of 3.2 (Stalker and Simpson 1995), indicating the wide adaptation of Arachis species to extremely diverse geographical environments. The geocarpic reproductive development probably protected the pods/seeds from the predators and helped in sustained survivability and distribution of the genus in South America. However, it is also possible that the geocarpic pod limited the rapid spread of the genus as estimated by Simpson et al. (2001) that the species moved only one meter/year across the continent.
Currently, the genus contains about 81 described species and several new species are likely to be described in the near future (Stalker et al. 2016; Simpson, personal communication). Krapovickas and Gregory (1994, 2007) delineated the species diversity into nine different sections based on geographical distributions, plant, pod and chromosome morphologies and cross-compatibility relationships. The cultivated species, A. hypogaea, was assigned to section Arachis, which also contains a number of wild species. They concluded that A. hypogaea hybridizes readily with the species in section Arachis whereas the species in the remaining eight sections are incompatible with it. Although the genus Arachis originated in the highlands of Brazil, the center of origin of the cultivated species, A. hypogaea, is believed to be southern Bolivia to northwestern Argentina. This observation was based on the presence of the parental diploid wild species of A. hypogaea in this region, the wide range of variation observed in pod and seed morphologies and that the germplasm collected in this area exhibited primitive characters associated with wild species, thus supporting the likely origin of A. hypogaea in this region (Hammons 1982; Stalker and Simpson 1995; Ferguson et al. 2004). Additionally, Simpson et al. (2001) suggested possible alternate regions for the origin of A. hypogaea on the west coast of Peru and/or the eastern slopes of Cordillera in the Andes, based on archeological evidence and prevalence of favorable environmental conditions for survival of plants for long periods of time.
Arachis hypogaea is an allotetraploid (2n = 4x = 40) with a genomic composition of AABB. It is considered to have originated from natural hybridization of two closely related diploid wild species followed by either chromosome duplication or fusion of unreduced gametes, thereby, resulting in an allotetraploid with two sets of chromosomes of each of the constituent parental genomes (Seijo et al. 2004, 2007). The general agreement among peanut researchers is that A. duranensis Krapov. & W.C. Gregory and A. ipaënsis Krapov. & W.C. Gregory are the A and B genome donor species, respectively (Kochert et al. 1991, 1996; Seijo et al. 2004, 2007). Recently, Bertioli et al. (2016) reported the genome sequences of these two species and demonstrated that they are very similar to the A and B subgenomes of A. hypogaea.
A list of primitive and advanced traits was compiled by Stalker and Simpson (1995) to demonstrate the evolution of domesticated peanut. Krapovickas (1968) suggested that A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea (see Sect. 1.1.2 below for the subspecies descriptions) was the most ancient cultivar type. His observation was based on the available records that it was the most predominant type found in the chaco region between southern Bolivia and northwestern Argentina, the likely area where A. hypogaea is believed to have originated. Additionally, the types found in this area exhibited many primitive traits such as the runner growth habit, a branching pattern similar to the wild Arachis species, small, two-seeded pods with marked constriction and slight reticulation, and seed dormancy. The above observations led Krapovickas and Gregory (1994, 2007) to conclude that south east Bolivia is the center of origin as well as diversity for subsp. hypogaea, whereas subsp. fastigiata differentiated in north western Bolivia and possibly in Peru, along with vars. fastigiata, peruviana and aequatoriana. However, genetic diversity analysis among botanical varieties using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers by Ferguson et al. (2004) revealed similarities of three botanical varieties of subsp. fastigiata, namely fastigiata, vulgaris and aequatoriana but did not support the inclusion of var. peruviana in subsp fastigiata. Further, they also found that the botanical varieties, hypogaea, and hirsuta were not closely related and suggested that they should not be grouped under subsp. hypogaea. Contrarily, He and Prakash (2001) demonstrated with AFLP markers that vars. aequatoriana and peruviana were closer to subsp. hypogaea than to subspecies fastigiata. Thus, there still exists, considerable confusion about the taxonomic classification of the cultivated species. Among the market types, Gregory et al. (1980) and Hammons (1982) suggested that the Bolivian and Amazonian geographic regions are the possible sites for the origin of the large-seeded Virginia types. Further, Hammons (1982) indicated that the Guarani area of northeastern Argentina, Paraguay and southern Brazil is the center of variation for the Spanish (var. vulgaris) market type whereas, the Valencia type (var. fastigiata) probably spread from Paraguay and central Brazil (Hammons 1982; Krapovickas 1968).
Further, Krapovickas (1968) and Gregory and Gregory (1976) recognized six other regions in South America as the secondary centers of diversity for the cultivated species based on morphological variability of the landraces. Additionally, Africa, China and India are considered as tertiary centers of diversity for A. hypogaea because of the large number of landraces and other local germplasm displaying different pod and seed traits (Gibbons et al. 1972). To characterize and describe the vast amount of morphological variation present in A. hypogaea, peanut descriptor lists were compiled (IBPGR and ICRISAT 1992; Pittman 1995). These descriptors included a standardized set of plant, pod, and seed traits to help classify the cultivated germplasm into related groups. The USDA National Plant Germplasm System peanut collection maintained at the Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit (PGRCU) in Griffin, GA, USA, routinely uses the U S peanut descriptors developed by Pittman (1995) to characterize the collection. Digital images of the various plant, pod and seed features are also compiled. This information is made available to researchers around the world on the Germplasm Resources Information Network Global at www.ars-grin.gov site.
It is paradoxical that in spite of the extensive morphological variation among the subspecies and botanical varieties of A. hypogaea, little molecular (DNA) polymorphism was observed in the cultivated species (Kochert et al. 1991; Halward et al. 1991, 1992; Moretzsohn et al. 2004, 2013; Pandey et al. 2012). A likely hypothesis for the lack of molecular polymorphisms in the cultivated species was that a single hybridization event accompanied by polyploidization coupled with the autogamous reproduction led to the genetic isolation of the raw tetraploid from the surrounding species diversity with no apparent gene flow between them (Kochert et al. 1996; Seijo et al. 2007). It is likely that following domestication, the early humans selected desirable types from the original population possibly for compact habit, and increased pod and seed sizes producing the different subspecies and varieties of the cultivated taxon, as we have today. Consequently, the vast amount of morphological variability observed in the cultivated taxon is likely to have resulted from natural and/or artificial selection rather than from the introgression of genes from different species (Seijo et al. 2007). However, Varshney et al. (2009) using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers with a diverse set of 189 A. hypogaea accessions observed significant polymorphisms and grouped the accessions into four different clusters. It is also encouraging that the recent advances in peanut genome sequencing and new genomic tools might help clarify the origin, evolution, variability and distribution of the genus and that of the cultivated species, A. hypogaea. An initial application of these technologies, particularly, of molecular markers for quantitative trait analysis was demonstrated by Pandey et al. (2012, 2013) for use in marker assisted breeding in cultivated peanut.
Contrarily, the wild species have exhibited extensive molecular variation among and within the different sectional groups (Halward et al. 1991, 1992; Tallury et al. 2005; Upadhyaya et al. 2008a, b; Friend et al. 2010; Moretzsohn et al. 2013). Molecular profiling of a composite collection consisting of 1000 diverse peanut accessions which included both cultivated and wild species demonstrated rich allelic diversity within the wild species with more than 100 unique alleles (Upadhyaya et al. 2008a, b) whereas the number of unique alleles in the two A. hypogaea subspecies, hypogaea and fastigiata were only 11 and 50, respectively. Further, the highest number of unique alleles were found in A. hypogaea accessions from the Americas with few unique alleles among the accessions from Asia and Africa. This study also demonstrated that the two subspecies, hypogaea and fastigiata accessions shared 70 alleles among them. Although the wild species shared only 15 alleles with subspecies hypogaea and 32 alleles with subspecies fastigiata, the wild species accessions grouped with subspecies hypogaea accessions (Upadhyaya et al. 2008a, b).
3.1.1.1 Geographical Spread of A. hypogaea
Following the Spanish and Portuguese explorations to South America, the cultivated peanut spread from the centers of origin and diversity in South America to Europe and then to Africa and Asia via trade voyages. There is no substantiated evidence for the occurrence of cultivated peanut in North America during this time. It was suggested that peanut was introduced into U.S. on slave trade ships from Africa via the coast of northeastern Brazil, where peanut was gathered as food source to complete the journey, strongly suggesting that the first peanut introductions into the U.S. were from Brazil rather than from Africa (Stalker and Simpson 1995).
3.1.1.2 Botanical Classification of A. hypogaea
Krapovickas and Gregory (1994, 2007) indicated that genus Arachis is defined by its morphological features of the underground structures, including the pods, rhizomatous stems, root systems, and hypocotyls. They showed that these defining characters grouped the Arachis collections into different geographic areas and ecological features. This, along with crossabilities of species, allowed them to group the collections into nine different sections (Gregory and Gregory 1979; Krapovickas and Gregory 1994, 2007). Arachis hypogaea belongs to section Arachis, which also contains 30 other wild species.
Further, Arachis hypogaea was divided into two subspecies, subsp. hypogaea and subsp. fastigiata by Krapovickas and Rigoni (1960) based on the absence versus presence of flowers on the main stem. They also proposed two botanical varieties of subsp. fastigiata, vars. fastigiata and vulgaris based on the pod traits. Later, Krapovickas (1968) proposed that subsp. hypogaea should also be divided into vars. hypogaea and hirsuta. With additional collections of A. hypogaea, Krapovickas and Gregory (1994, 2007) not only confirmed the two subspecies of A. hypogaea (subsp. hypogaea and subsp. fastigiata) but also expanded botanical varietal groups to six (vars. hypogaea, hirsuta, fastigiata, peruviana, aequatoriana and vulgaris) based on plant growth habit, leaf color and branching patterns as described below, which also includes the four major market types grown in the U.S.
-
A.
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea L.
-
No flowers on main stem
-
Alternating pairs of floral and vegetative axes on branches
-
Branches short and less hairy
-
Dark green leaves
-
Prostrate or spreading growth habit
-
Late maturing
-
Seed dormancy present
-
var. hypogaea:
-
Leaflets with glabrous dorsal surface; with a few hairs on the midrib
-
Prostrate/spreading (runner) or bunch type growth habit
Market type: Virginia
-
Less hairy short main stem and leaves
-
Large pods, two seeded
-
Slight constriction and reticulation
Market type: Runner
-
Less hairy main stem and leaves
-
Small pods, two seeded
-
Slight constriction and reticulation
var . hirsuta:
-
Leaflets with 1–2 mm long hairs dispersed on entire dorsal surface
-
Long main stem and very hairy,
Market type: Peruvian runner
-
More hairy leaves
-
Late maturing
-
Long pods, 2-3 seeded
-
Deep constriction and prominent reticulation
-
B.
A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata
-
Flowers on main stem
-
Sequential floral and vegetative branches
-
Branches less hairy
-
Light green leaves
-
Bunch or erect growth habit
-
Early maturing
-
Seed dormancy absent
-
var. fastigiata
-
Leaflets with glabrous dorsal surface or hairs only on the midrib
-
Few branches, short and slender
-
Pods with smooth or slight reticulation
Market type: Valencia
-
Sparsely branched; curved branches
-
Erect growth habit
-
Usually 2–4 seeded, long pods
-
Red seed coat
var. aequatoriana
-
Erect plants with large leaves
-
Leaflets 1–2 mm long. hairy dorsal surface, dispersed on entire surface
-
Main stem with short inflorescences
-
Long reproductive lateral branches
-
Prominent longitudinal ribs on pods with deep pod reticulation
-
Long pods with 3–4 seeded
-
Seed coat is commonly violet
var. peruviana
-
Thick, large leaves; leaflets glabrous on both sides
-
Hairy on the margins and dorsal surface on midrib of leaflets
-
Long, robust reproductive branches
-
Flowers on both main stem and lateral branches
-
3–4-seeded pods
-
Seed coat colors vary from black, violet, cream to variegated
-
Prominent longitudinal ribs on pods with deep pod reticulation
var. vulgaris
-
Erect growth habit with many upright branches
-
Medium sized leaves with glabrous surface, long hairs on margins
-
Mostly 2-seeded, small pods bunched at the base of the plant
-
Slight pod constriction and reticulation
Market type: Spanish
-
More branched; upright branches
-
Light green leaves
3.2 Description of Seed to Adult Plant
3.2.1 Germination and Plant Morphology
Arachis hypogaea seed is covered by a thin seed coat or testa (commonly called as “skin”). It varies in color from white to tan to black and different shades of red or pink and provides protection to the seed from soil microorganisms. The seeds also vary in size from the large Virginia market types to the small, rounded Spanish types. The seed is composed of two cotyledons, which are the first true leaves. They contain stored food reserves for the young seedling during germination and to establish a plant. The peanut seed contains the dormant shoot (plumule/leaf primordia) and the root initials (radicle). When a seed is planted under optimum soil moisture and temperature conditions, the process of germination is initiated in about three to five days. First, the radicle starts to grow forming the upper hypocotyl and the lower primary root. This is accompanied by the rapid elongation of the hypocotyl which pushes the cotyledons above ground within a week. The cotyledons split open to expose the shoot primordia which extends to form the epicotyl. The epicotyl forms the main stem whereas the lower hypocotyl elongates to form the tap root (Gregory et al. 1973). From the taproot, lateral roots emerge within 3–5 days after germination and are extensively developed by about 7–10 days. Occasionally, on mature plants, adventitious roots are formed where branches are in contact with soil.
Peanut plant is an erect or prostrate type where plants are usually about 30–45 cm tall and the lateral branches spread to about 30 cm wide. However, on many wild species, the lateral branches are a few meters long with a very short main stem. Plants have compound leaves with four leaflets (tetrafoliate) which are located alternately on the main stem and lateral branches. However, three species from the section Trierectoides, namely, A. guaranitica A. tuberosa and A. sesquijuga have leaves with three leaflets (trifoliate). The leaves are connected to the stems by an adnate stipule and leaflets vary in size and shape, usually oblong and lanceolate in some wild species. The A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea has dark green leaves compared to the lighter green leaves in A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata. The stems are angular, mostly green with the exception of Valencia and aequatoriana types which are reddish purple. As summarized in the previous section, in some botanical varieties hairy stems are commonly seen. Stem pigmentation, hairiness on stems and leaves has been shown to deter leaf feeding insect pests (Campbell et al. 1976; Stalker and Campbell 1983; Stalker et al. 1984; Sharma et al. 2003).
3.2.2 Flower Morphology, Fertilization and Pod/Seed Development
Generally, peanut plants produce flowers about 30 days after germination. It is an indeterminate plant and as a result, flowers are produced throughout the growing season leading up to harvest. Flowers are usually present in leaf axils on the branches and also on the main stem in subspecies fastigiata types. Commonly, three flowers are present in each inflorescence, which is a raceme. At any given time, usually only one flower opens and the interval between the openings of flowers in the same inflorescence vary up to several days. Since the flowers contain fertile, male and female reproductive parts, natural self-fertilization leads to the development of pods.
The flower has five brightly colored petals (corolla) consisting of a large standard (Banner), two wing petals and two fused keel petals. The calyx is green with five lobes of which, one lobe is opposite the keel whereas the other four are fused and cover the back side of the standard. The standard is usually yellow or orange with red veins on the inner face. The wings are usually yellow surrounding the keel. The keel is almost colorless and encloses the stamens and style. The androecium is monadelphous with filaments fused for two-thirds of their length and contains eight functional stamens and two, small sterile ones. The stamens produce pollen (male gamets) for fertilization of the egg cell. The flower is attached to the stem (at the leaf axil) by a long tube like structure called a hypanthium or “calyx tube”. The flowers are subtended by a bract and are sessile although they appear as pedicillate because of tubular hypanthium. The style is enclosed within the hypanthium and is connected to the ovary (female part) located at the base of the hypanthium in the leaf axil. The tip of the style, called stigma is at the same level or slightly above the anthers so pollen grains can reach it. Differences in stigma morphology were observed between A. hypogaea and the wild species. In A. hypogaea, the stigma is of dry papillate type (Lakshmi and Shivanna 1986) with no surrounding hairs and probably accommodates about 15 pollen grains (Moss and Rao 1995). On the other hand, the annual Arachis species have large stigmatic surface whereas the perennial species have smaller, cuticularized stigmas with unicellular hairs accommodating a maximum of only three pollen grains (Lu et al. 1990). However, in the wild species, A. lignosa, the truncated shape of the stigma and its elevated position relative to the anthers restricts natural self-pollination (Banks 1990). In this case, manual tripping of flowers is needed for pollen to reach stigma for fertilization and later pod development. Outcrossing is possible with bees or other insects, however, it is limited to less than 10% under natural field conditions (Hammons 1973; Knauft et al. 1992).
The process of fertilization begins with anthesis, which occurs within a few hours after sunrise with the opening of the flower. The mature pollen grain is two-celled with two generative nuclei (Xi 1991). The ovary usually has two ovules, and up to three or more in Valencia types. Each ovule contains a mature embryo sac with a well-differentiated egg cell at the micropylar end and a polar nucleus surrounded by starch grains. When pollen germinates on a receptive stigma, the pollen tube containing the mature pollen grain (male gamete) with the two generative nuclei travels through the style and eventually enters the embryo sac through the micropyle. One of the two generative nuclei fuses with the egg cell (syngamy) to form the embryo and the other with the polar nucleus (double fertilization) to form the endosperm. Following syngamy, the starch grains breakdown to provide initial nutrition for the proembryo to grow which eventually develops into a mature seed. The entire process of fertilization usually takes about 18–24 h from anthesis to syngamy (Pattee et al. 1991). Each ovule develops into a peanut seed and the ovary becomes the pod.
Following syngamy, pod development is initiated as a pointed, stalk like structure which is called the “peg” (Smith 1950). During the early embryo growth (24–72 h after fertilization), an intercalary meristem at the base of the ovary actively divides forming the peg with the fertilized ovules at its tip. Pegs are usually observed between 4 and 7 days after self-pollination and are positively geotropic (Zamiski and Ziv 1976) and require darkness for pod formation (Ziv 1981). As the peg is extending to enter the soil (aerial phase), the embryo remains in a quiescent stage, usually, as an 8-celled proembryo (Pattee and Mohapatra 1987). It is only after soil penetration that the elongation of the peg is arrested, to initiate pod formation. The first sign of pod development involves the swelling of the peg tip along with the horizontal turning of the peg. The peg becomes diageotropic after soil penetration such that the ovules are always located on the upper wall of the pod, with the pod tip pointing away from the plant (Moss and Rao 1995). Pod enlargement occurs from base towards the tip with simultaneous faster development of the basal ovule (Smith 1950). A mature peanut pod is developed in about 60–80 days after pollination. However, due to the indeterminate nature of peanut plants, flowering continues throughout the growing season until harvest. Consequently, pods at different maturities are seen on plants even at harvesting time. Detailed descriptions of peanut embryology including the growth and development of pegs, pods, and seeds are well documented in literature (Smith 1950; Gregory et al. 1973; Periasamy and Smapoornam 1984; Pattee and Mohapatra 1987; Xi 1991; Moss and Rao 1995).
3.3 Conclusion
Plants of genus Arachis are characterized by their unique underground structures, including the root systems, rhizomatous stems, pods, and hypocotyls. These features led to the adaptation and grouping of Arachis germplasm into different geographical regions and evolution of botanical varieties. Arachis hypoagea is a native, new world taxon and exhibits large morphological variation as described above with a wide range of adaptation to many different ecological conditions. An understanding of preservation and characterization of this genetic diversity is crucial to future genetic improvement of A. hypogaea.
References
Banks DJ (1990) Hand-tripped flowers promote seed production in Arachis lignosa, a wild peanut. Peanut Sci 17:23–24
Bertioli DJ, Cannon SB, Froenicke L, Huang G, Farmer AD, Cannon EKS, Liu X, Gao D, Clevenger J, Dash S, Ren L, Moretzsohn MC, Shirasawa K, Wei W, Vidigal B, Abernathy B, Chu Y, Niederhuth CE, Umale P, Araújo ACG, Kozik A, Kim KD, Burow MD, Varshney RK, Wang X, Zhang X, Barkley N, Guimarães PM, Isobe S, Guo B, Liao B, Stalker HT, Schmitz RJ, Scheffler BE, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Xun X, Jackson SA, Michelmore R, Ozias-Akins P (2016) The genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis, the diploid ancestors of cultivated peanut. Nat Genet 48:438–446
Campbell WV, Emery DA, Wynne JC (1976) Resistance of peanuts to the potato leafhopper. Peanut Sci 3:40–43
Ferguson ME, Bramel PJ, Chandra S (2004) Gene diversity among botanical varieties in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop Sci 44:1847–1854
Friend SA, Quandt D, Tallury SP, Stalker HT, Hilu KW (2010) Species, genomes and section relationships in genus Arachis (Fabaceae): a molecular phylogeny. Plant Syst Evol 290:185–199
Galgaro L, Valls JFM, Lopes CR (1997) Study of the genetic variability and similarity among and within Arachis villosulicarpa, A. pietrarellii and A. hypogaea through isoenzyme analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 44:9–15
Gibbons RW, Bunting AH, Smartt J (1972) The classification of varieties of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 21:78–85
Gimenes MA, Lopes CR, Galgaro ML, Valls JFM, Kochert G (2000) Genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships based on RAPD analysis in section Caulorrhizae, genus Arachis (Leguminosae). Euphytica 116:187–195
Gregory WC, Gregory MP (1976) Groundnut. In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. Longman Group Ltd., London, pp 151–154
Gregory MP, Gregory WC (1979) Exotic germplasm of Arachis L. interspecific hybrids. J Hered 70:185–193
Gregory WC, Gregory MP, Krapovickas A, Smith BW, Yarbrough JA (1973) Structure and genetic resources of peanuts. Peanuts—Culture and Uses. American Peanut Research and Education Association, Stillwater, OK, pp 47–133
Gregory WC, Krapovickas A, Gregory MP (1980) Structure, variation, evolution and classification in Arachis. In: Summerfield RJ, Bunting AH (eds) Advances in Legume Science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, pp 469–481
Halward TM, Stalker HT, Larue EA, Kochert G (1991) Genetic variation detectable with molecular markers among unadapted germplasm resources of cultivated peanut and related wild species. Genome 34:1013–1020
Halward T, Stalker T, LaRue E, Kochert G (1992) Use of single-primer DNA amplifications in genetic studies of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Mol Biol 18:315–325
Hammons RO (1973) Genetics of Arachis hypogaea. Peanuts-culture and uses. American Peanut Res Educ Assn, Stillwater, OK, pp 135–173
Hammons RO (1982) Origin and early history of the peanut. In: Pattee HE, Young CT (eds) Peanut Science and Technology. American Peanut Research and Education Society, Yoakum, TX, pp 1–20
He G, Prakash C (2001) Evaluation of genetic relationships among botanical varieties of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using AFLP markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 48:347–352
IBPGR and ICRISAT (1992) Descriptors for groundnut (second revision). IBPGR, Rome and ICRISAT, Patancheru, India
Knauft DA, Chiyembekeza AJ, Gorbet DW (1992) Possible reproductive factors contributing to outcrossing in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Sci 19:29–31
Kochert G, Halward T, Branch WD, Simpson CE (1991) RFLP variability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars and wild species. Theor Appl Genet 81:565–570
Kochert G, Stalker HT, Gimenes M, Galgaro L, Lopes CR, Moore K (1996) RFLP and cytogenetic evidence on the origin and evolution of allotetraploid domesticated peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 83:1282–1291
Krapovickas A (1968) The origin, variability and spread of the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea. In: Ucko RJ, Dimbleby CW (eds) The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. Duckworth, London, pp 427–441
Krapovickas A, Gregory WC (1994) Taxonomia del genero Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 8(1–4):1–186
Krapovickas A, Gregory WC (2007) Taxonomy of the genus Arachis (Leguminosae) (trans: Williams DE and Simpson CE). Bonplandia 16(Supl.):1–205
Krapovickas A, Rigoni VA (1960) La nominclatura de las subspecies y variedades de Arachis hypogaea L. Revista de Investigaciones Agricoles 14:197–228
Lakshmi KV, Shivanna KR (1986) Structure and cytochemistry of the pistil in Arachis hypogaea. Proc Ind Acad Sci (Plant Sci) 95:357–363
Lu J, Mayer A, Pickersgill B (1990) Stigma morphology and pollination in Arachis L. (Leguminosae). Ann Bot 66:73–82
Moretzsohn MC, Gouvea EG, Inglis PW, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Valls JFM, Bertioli DJ (2013) A study of the relationships of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and its most closely related wild species using intron sequences and microsatellite markers. Ann Bot 111:113–126
Moretzsohn MC, Hopkins MS, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Valls JFM, Ferreira ME (2004) Genetic diversity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and its wild relatives based on the analysis of hypervariable regions of the genome. BMC Plant Biol 4:11
Moss JP, Rao VR (1995) The peanut-reproductive development to plant maturity. Advances in peanut science. American Peanut Res Educ Soc, Stillwater, Oklahoma, pp 1–13
Pandey MK, Monyo E, Ozias-Akins P, Liang X, Guimarães P, Nigam SN, Upadhyaya HD, Janila P, Zhang X, Guo B (2012) Advances in Arachis genomics for peanut improvement. Biotechnol Adv 30:639–651
Pandey MK, Upadhyaya HD, Rathore A, Vadez V, Sheshasayee MS, Sriswathi M, Govil M, Gowda MVC, Kumar VA, Khera P, Bhat RS, Monyo E, Varshney RK (2013) Association mapping for resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses and agronomically important traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). In: Sixth International Conference of the Peanut Research Community on Advances in Arachis through Genomics and Biotechnology. Zhengzhou, China, p 50 (abstract)
Pattee HE, Mohapatra SC (1987) Anatomical changes during ontogeny of the peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) fruit: mature megagametophyte through heart shaped embryo. Bot Gaz 148:156–164
Pattee HE, Stalker HT, Giesbrecht FG (1991) Comparative peg, ovary and ovule ontogeny of selected cultivated and wild-type Arachis species. Bot Gaz 152:64–71
Periasamy K, Sampoornam C (1984) The morphology and anatomy of ovule and fruit development in Arachis hypogaea L. Ann Bot 53:399–411
Pittman RN (1995) United States peanut descriptors. USDA-ARS-132, US Government printing office, Washington, DC, pp 18
Seijo G, Lavia GI, Fernandez A, Krapovickas A, Ducasse DA, Bertioli DJ, Moscone EA (2007) Genomic relationships between the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea, Leguminosae) and its close relatives revealed by double GISH. Am J Bot 94:1963–1971
Seijo G, Lavia GI, Fernandez A, Krapovickas A, Ducasse DA, Moscone EA (2004) Physical mapping of 5S and 18S-25S rRNA genes as evidence that Arachis duranensis and A. ipaensis are the wild diploid progenitors of A. hypogaea (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 91:1294–1303
Sharma HC, Pampapathy G, Dwivedi SL, Reddy LJ (2003) Mechanisms and diversity of resistance to insect pests in wild relatives of groundnut. J Econ Ent 96:1886–1897
Simpson CE, Krapovickas A, Valls VFM (2001) History of Arachis including evidence of A. hypogaea L. progenitors. Peanut Sci 28:78–80
Smith BW (1950) Arachis hypogaea. Aerial flower and subterranean fruit. Am J Bot 37:802–815
Stalker HT, Campbell WV (1983) Resistance of wild species of peanut to an insect complex. Peanut Sci 10:30–33
Stalker HT, Campbell WV, Wynne JC (1984) Evaluation of cultivated and wild peanut species for resistance to the lesser corn stalk borer, Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Econ Ent 77:53–57
Stalker HT, Simpson CE (1995) Genetic resources in Arachis. In: Pattee HE, Stalker HT (eds) Advances in peanut science. Amer Peanut Res Educ Soc, Stillwater, OK, pp 14–53
Stalker HT, Tallury SP, Seijo GR, Leal-Bertioli SC (2016) Biology, speciation and utilization of peanut species. In: Stalker HT, Wilson RF (eds) Peanuts: Genetics. APRES and AOCS Press, Processing and Utilization, pp 27–66
Tallury SP, Hilu KW, Milla SR, Friend SA, Alsaghir M, Stalker HT, Quandt D (2005) Genomic affinities in Arachis section Arachis (Fabaceae): molecular and cytogenetic evidence. Theor Appl Genet 111:1229–1237
Upadhyaya HD, Bhattacharjee R, Hoisington DA, Chandra S, Varshney RK, Valls JFM, Moretzsohn MC, Leal-Bertioli S, Guimaraes P, Bertioli D (2008a) Molecular characterization of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) composite collection. In: Project abstracts, GCP annual meeting, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 51–52
Upadhyaya HD, Dwivedi SL, Varshney RK, Hoisington DA, Gowda CLL (2008b) Using genetic and genomic resources to broaden the genetic base of cultivated groundnut. In: Third International Conference of the Peanut Research Community on Advances in Arachis through Genomics and Biotechnology. Zhengzhou, China, p 6 (abstract)
Valls JFM, Rao VR, Simpson CE, Krapovickas A (1985) Current status of collection and conservation of South American groundnut germplasm with emphasis on wild species of Arachis. In: Moss JP (ed.) Proc. Intern. Workshop on Cytogenetics of Arachis. October 31–November 2, 1983. ICRISAT, Patancheru, A. P. India, pp 15–35
Varshney RK, Mahendar T, Aruna R, Nigam SN, Neelima K, Vadez V, Hoisington DA (2009) High level of natural variation in a groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm collection assayed by selected informative SSR markers. Plant Breed. 128:486–494
Xi X-Y (1991) Development and structure of pollen and embryo sac in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Bot Gaz 152:164–172
Zamski E, Ziv M (1976) Pod formation and its geotropic orientation in the peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., in relation to light and mechanical stimulus. Ann Bot 40:631–636
Ziv M (1981) Photomorphogenesis of the gynophore, pod and embryo in peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. Ann Bot 48:353–359
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tallury, S.P. (2017). Peanut: Origin and Botanical Descriptions. In: Varshney, R., Pandey, M., Puppala, N. (eds) The Peanut Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63935-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63935-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63933-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63935-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)