Abstract
Stakeholder engagement lies at the core of stakeholder theory even though management scholars have not researched engagement thoroughly relative to other aspects of stakeholder theory. In fact, practicing managers, not academics, have led exploration of and innovation in stakeholder engagement. This paper provides scholars with analysis of a practical integrative stakeholder engagement conducted by The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) in partnership with World Wildlife Fund (WWF). This case is unique in that the analyzed integrative stakeholder engagement was both extremely successful and sustainable by going beyond the original partners and spreading among stakeholders across the entire value chain and beyond. Triggered by community concerns in India, TCCC’s best practices in engaging multiple stakeholders to preserve freshwater spread across all continents and went on to be adopted by other companies and their stakeholders which were outside of TCCC’s direct reach. The analyzed case is also valuable in showing that TCCC, though enjoying the leading position in its industry and having considerable influence over its value chain, chose to engage stakeholders in its freshwater conservation initiative through a collaborative, dialogue-based process, demonstrating a stakeholder mindset both on the part of the company and multiple stakeholders.
The authors contributed equally and are listed alphabetically.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Data about the critics of the partnership was obtained from secondary sources. No interviews were conducted to gather data from primary sources.
References
Brownlee II, E. Richard, and Allison Elias. 2014. World Wildlife Fund and The Coca-Cola Company: A global partnership for freshwater conservation. Case UVA-ENT-0204, the University of Virginia Darden School Foundation.
Chaklader, Barnali, and Neeran Gautam. 2013. Efficient water management through public-private partnership model: An experiment in CSR by Coca-Cola India. The Journal for Decision Makers 38 (4): 97–104.
Cimilluca, Dana, Betsy McKay, and Jeffrey McCracken. 2010. Coke near deal for bottler. The Wall Street Journal, February 25. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704240004575085871950146304. Retrieved February 20, 2016.
Clay, Jason. 2010a. Jason Clay: How big brands can help save biodiversity. TEDGlobal talk, 19:29, July 2010. http://www.ted.com/talks/jason_clay_how_big_brands_can_save_biodiversity. Retrieved July 8, 2014.
———. 2010b. TEDxWorldBankGroup – Jason Clay – Water. YouTube video, 18:51, uploaded by “TEDx Talks,” May 21. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgOFe4Pkk_0. Retrieved July 8, 2014.
Dawkins, Cedric E. 2014. The principle of good faith: Toward substantive stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business Ethics 121: 283–295.
Donovan, William. 2010. Pepsi, Coke report on water conservation. TriplePundit, September 21. http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/09/pepsi-coke-set-water-conservation-goals. Retrieved June 1, 2014.
Economic Times. 2007. Adding fizz to the fire. Economic Times, June 27. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2007-06-27/news/27684412_1_bottling-operations-coca-cola-coke-zero. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
Elliott, Stuart. 2012. List of global brands keeps Coke on top, and Apple jumps up. New York Times, October 1, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/02/business/media/best-global-brands-report-has-coca-cola-on-top-and-apple-climbing.html. Retrieved Feb 20, 2016.
FAO. 2010. India. Aquastat Database, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/countries_regions/ind/index.stm. Retrieved May 2, 2014.
Fassin, Yves. 2012. Stakeholder management, reciprocity and stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 109: 83–96.
Freeman, R. Edward. 1984/2010. Strategic management: A strategic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2008. Managing for Stakeholders. In Ethical Theory and Business, ed. T.L. Beauchamp, N.E. Bowie, and D.G. Arnold, 8th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Freeman, R. Edward, Jeffrey S. Harrison, and Andrew C. Wicks. 2007. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Freeman, R. Edward, Jeffrey S. Harrison, Andrew C. Wicks, Bidhan L. Parmar, and Simone De Colle. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodstein, Jerry D., and Andrew C. Wicks. 2007. Corporate and stakeholder responsibility: Making business ethics a two-way conversation. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3): 375–398.
Greenwood, Michelle. 2007. Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4): 315–327.
Habisch, Andre, Lorenzo Patelli, Matteo Pedrini, and Christoph Schwartz. 2011. Different talks with different folks: A comparative survey of stakeholder dialogue in Germany, Italy, and the U.S. Journal of Business Ethics 100: 381–404.
Hoekstra, Arjen Y. 2013. The water footprint of modern consumer society. New York: Routledge.
Hoffman, Andrew J. 2009. Shades of Green. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring: 40–49.
Hoffman, Andrew J., and Sarah Howie. 2010. Coke in the cross hairs: Water, India, and the University of Michigan. Case 1-429-098, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Hoovers. 2014. “The Coca-Cola Company”, by Biesada, A. Hoovers.com. http://webadept.hoovers.com/company/The_Coca-Cola_Company/rfyhsi-1-1njhxm.html. Retrieved July 8, 2014.
Hwang, Linda, and Emma Stewart. 2008, March. Drinking it in: The evolution of a global water stewardship program at The Coca-Cola Company. Business for Social Responsibility.
IFC. 2009. Stakeholder engagement and the Board: Integrating best governance practices. International Finance Corporation. http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/19017b8048a7e667a667e76060ad5911/FINAL%2BFocus8_5.pdf?MOD=AJPERES.
Karnani, Aneel. 2013. Corporate social responsibility does not avert the tragedy of the commons – Case study: Coca-Cola India. Working paper, University of Michigan.
Koch, Greg. 2010. Coca-Cola’s water stewardship strategy drive. Guardian, November 29.
———. 2012. Valuing nature – how responsible water use sustains business, communities and ecosystems. Management Innovation exchange, May 11. http://www.managementexchange.com/story/valuing-nature-%E2%80%93-how-responsible-water-use-sustains-business-communities-and-ecosystems.
———. 2014. Case writer e-mail correspondence with Greg Koch, director, global water stewardship. The Coca-Cola Company, June 13.
Laplume, Andre O., Karan Sonpar, and Reginald A. Litz. 2008. Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management 34 (6): 1152–1189.
Liu, Ling Woo. 2008. Water Pressure. Time, June 12. http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1814261,00.html. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
Lawrence, Anne T. 2002. The drivers of stakeholder engagement: Reflections on the case of Royal Dutch/Shell. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, p. 71+. Academic OneFile, Accessed 19 July 2017.
Makower, Joel. 2014. State of Green Business: Water rises as a risk factor. GreenBiz.com, February 3. http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2014/02/03/state-green-business-water-rises-risk-factor. Retrieved June 1, 2014.
MarketLine. 2011. Coca-Cola case study: The world’s most recognizable brand report, December 1.
———. 2012. The Coca-Cola Company. SWOT analysis. http://store.marketline.com/Product/the_coca_cola_company?productid=37CB5616-D04E-49EE-9F5C-FFE75047D6FF.Retrieved September 30, 2012.
OECD. 2015. Stakeholder engagement for inclusive water governance, OECD Studies on Water. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264231122-en.
Pearce, Fred. 2008. Greenwash: Are Coke’s Green Claims the Real Thing? Guardian, December 4. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/dec/04/coca-cola-coke-water-neutral.Retrieved February 21, 2016.
Phillips, Robert. 1997. Stakeholder theory, organizational ethics and a principle of stakeholder fairness. Doctoral dissertation, the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, the University of Virginia, August.
———. 2003. Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Phillips, Robert, and Craig B. Caldwell. 2005. Value chain responsibility: A farewell to arm’s length. Business and Society Review 110 (4): 345–370.
Phillips, Robert, R. Edward Freeman, and Andrew C. Wicks. 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4): 479–502.
Senge, Peter, Bryan Smith, Nina Kruschwitz, Joe Laur, and Sara Schley. 2008. Unconventional allies: Coke and WWF partner for sustainable water. In The Necessary Revolution: How Individuals and Organizations Are Working Together to Create a Sustainable World. New York: Doubleday.
Spain, William. 2010. Bottler acquisition could be a risky proposition for coke. Market Watch, February 25. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bottler-acquisition-could-be-risky-for-coke-2010-02-25. Retrieved February 20, 2016.
Starik, Mark. 1995. Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. Journal of Business Ethics 14: 207–217.
Stecklow, Steve. 2005. How a global web of activists gives Coke problems in India. The Wall Street Journal, June 7.
Strand, Robert, and R. Edward Freeman. 2015. Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics 127 (1): 65–85.
TCCC. 2005. The Coca-Cola Company releases 2004 environmental review; reports gains in water, packaging and energy efficiency. Corporate Social Responsibility Newswire, October 18. http://www.csrwire.com/press_releases/22442-The-Coca-Cola-Company-Releases-2004-Environmental-Review-Reports-Gains-in-Water-Packaging-and-Energy-Efficiency. Retrieved May 6, 2014.
———. 2007. The Coca-Cola Company pledges to replace the water it uses in its beverages and their production. Corporate Social Responsibility Newswire, June 5. http://www.csrwire.com/press_releases/22449-The-Coca-Cola-Company-Pledges-to-Replace-the-Water-It-Uses-in-Its-Beverages-and-Their-Production. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
———. 2011. The Coca-Cola Company 2011 annual review “Passionately refreshing a thirsty world”. https://www.coca-colacompany.com/annual-review/2011/pdf/TCCC_2011_Annual_Review.pdf. Retrieved February 20, 2016.
———. 2012. “2011/2012 Sustainability Report”, The Coca-Cola Company.
———. 2015. “2014/2015 Sustainability Report”, The Coca-Cola Company.
TCCC-WWF. 2012. The Coca-Cola Company and World Wildlife Fund partnership progress report “Inspiring a global movement: TCCC-WWF global freshwater conservation partnership”, December 31. http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/water-stewardship.html#section-replenishing-the-water-we-use. Retrieved April 17, 2016.
TNC-TCCC. 2010. The Nature Conservancy & The Coca-Cola Company report “Product water footprint assessment”, September. http://assets.coca-colacompany.com/3a/55/e0c99ad14178a0f9aececdb81e83/2010_water_footprint-assessments.pdf. Retrieved February 19, 2016.
Walsh, Heather, and Timothy J. Dowding. 2012. Sustainability and the Coca-Cola Company: The global water crisis and Coca-Cola’s business case for water stewardship. International Journal of Business Insights and Transformation 4, special issue 3, January, 106–118.
Winston, Andrew. 2015. Coca-Cola met its water goals early. Were they too easy? Harvard Business Review, web-site, September 19. https://hbr.org/2015/09/coca-cola-met-its-water-goals-early-were-they-too-easy. Retrieved February 19, 2016.
WWAP. 2003. World Water Assessment Programme “Water for people, water for life,” United Nations World Water Development Report. March.
WWF. 2011a. World Wildlife Fund annual review. http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/annual_report_2011.pdf.
———. 2011b. World Wildlife Fund annual report. http://assets.worldwildlife.org/financial_reports/1/reports/original/Annual_Report_2011.pdf?1342667695. Retrieved July 8, 2014.
———. 2014a. WWF in the new millennium. World Wildlife Fund website. http://wwf.panda.org/who_we_are/history/millennium/. Retrieved June 1, 2014.
———. 2014b. Harnessing forces for conservation World Wildlife Fund website. http://worldwildlife.org/initiatives/harnessing-forces-for-conservation. Retrieved June 1, 2014.
WWF-TCCC. 2011. A transformative partnership to conserve water. Annual Review 2011, World Wildlife Fund and The Coca-Cola Company. http://assets.coca-colacompany.com/92/42/366a84844ccba023ab241b8a0524/2011%20Annual%20Review%20FINAL%20REVISED.pdf. Retrieved July 8, 2014.
WWF-TCCC. 2013. The WWF-TCCC partnership renewal agreement. http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/converging-on-water-an-innovativeconservation-partnership. Retrieved July 19, 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Exhibit 15.1: Freshwater Partnership Terms, 2007
Focus area | Initial goal, 2007 | Progress achieved, 2011 |
---|---|---|
River basin conservation | In seven river basins: Better governance and management; resource protection; conservation in balance with development; biodiversity protection | Met conservation goals across the seven basins |
Plant performance and water stewardship | Improve water efficiency 20% globally | On target for 20% reduction (2004–12) |
Climate protection | Stabilize emissions and 5% reduction in developed countries by 2015 | 11% increase system-wide and 9% reduction in developed countries (2004–11) |
Supply chain | Promote sustainable agricultural production | Bonsucro Standard and Coca-Cola principles |
Inspire a global movement | Build awareness of partnership and environmental challenges | Local collaborations in nearly 50 countries; Arctic Home campaign |
Exhibit 15.2: Freshwater Partnership Additions, 2010–2011
Focus area | Year implemented | Progress achieved, 2011 |
---|---|---|
Packaging | 2010 | Gather information and develop strategy |
Executive collaboration | 2011 | Public meetings between TCCC CEO and WWF CEO |
Coca-Cola sustainability officer | 2011 | Create global Office of Sustainability and first chief sustainability officer |
Legacy web tool | 2011 | Provides leading practices for corporate-NGO partnerships centered on river basin conservation |
Arctic home | 2011 | Cause-marketing campaign to raise awareness and funding for polar bear |
Exhibit 15.3: Summary of Main Features of the WWF-TCCC Partnership Renewal Agreement
Because freshwater is of critical importance to both TCCC and WWF, in 2007, we launched a transformational partnership with an ambitious goal to conserve the world’s freshwater. On January 1, 2013, we renewed our global partnership for an additional 8 years, through December 31, 2020.
Building on the strong foundation established in the first phase of joint work, this renewed partnership will build upon our legacy of water conservation. However, we will go even further—extending our reach and influence to more deeply engage the company’s value chain, involving additional partners to achieve greater scale and impact, and sparking commitments from businesses, governments, and consumers that will mobilize action to conserve nature and its freshwater resources. Going beyond water conservation, we call this next phase of work “Water+.”
Through our Water+ commitment, we will:
-
+ help ensure healthy, resilient river basins in 11 key regions.
WWF and TCC will work together to conserve some of the world’s most important places spanning Asia, Africa, and the Americas. Specifically, these include the river basins of the Amazon, Koshi, Mekong, RG/RB, Yangtze, and Zambezi; the catchments of the GBR and MAR; and key regions in the Amur-Heilong, Atlantic Forests, and NGP.
-
+ measurably improve environmental performance across the company’s value chain.
We will improve agriculture, climate, packaging, and water efficiency impacts, building a sustainable value chain for the twenty-first century and beyond.
-
+ work to integrate the value of nature into public and private decision-making processes.
Together, we will advance holistic conservation planning and science to advocate for nature in public and private decision-making processes.
-
+ convene influential partners to strengthen and amplify our work.
We will convene extraordinary partners from government, academia, industry, civil society, and the public to help solve shared global challenges.
Our goal is to ensure better integration and coordination to maximize our impact. For this reason, work is organized around three integrated work streams:
-
Freshwater Conservation: To drive innovative, climate-smart solutions to freshwater challenges though basin-wide engagement and comprehensive policy support.
-
Global Value Chains: To improve environmental performance in water efficiency, packaging, climate protection and sustainable agriculture across TCCC’s value chain.
-
Valuing Nature: To integrate the value of nature explicitly into public and private policy decisions and enhance our understanding of the dynamics involved in meeting multiple planning objectives in a basin.
This phase of the partnership is focused on enabling action across these partnership work streams, including tracking, reporting, and delivering upon best-in-class environmental performance targets, aligned with the company’s 2020 goals.
To deepen, sustain, and amplify our work beyond our two organizations, a central theme for this phase is leverage—Engaging TCCC’s business partners, industry associations, governments, aid/development agencies, financial and insurance institutions, other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and private foundations to deepen, sustain, and amplify our work.
We will also emphasize engagement, with the aim of mobilizing a global movement for freshwater conservation that will unite TCCC’s marketing strength with WWF’s conservation goals, to make a measurable, global impact.
Source: WWF-TCCC 2013 Annual Partnership Progress Report.
Exhibit 15.4a: Sources of Funding, WWF-TCCC Partnership Priorities, 2007–2012 (in U.S. dollars)
Exhibit 15.4b: Third-Party Funding for Partnership Priorities, 2007–12 (in U.S. dollars)
Australia: Government and farmers | 6,855,000 |
Danube: EU floodplains | 3,470,000 |
Danube: Liberty Island EU funds | 3,170,000 |
U.S.: New Mexico state funding for RGRB | 2,800,000 |
Vietnam: Dong Thap Province for Train Chim | 1,429,600 |
U.S.: Elephant Butte irrigation for RGRB | 1,250,000 |
Mekong: German government | 1,250,000 |
U.S.: USFWS for RGBG Pecos River | 500,000 |
Belize and Honduras: SUPSI work on sugarcane | 313,000 |
Mozambique: USAID Lake Niassa | 300,000 |
El Salvador and Guatemala: WADA work on sugarcane | 182,000 |
Honduras: Teculutan match for water fund | 125,000 |
Brazil: Solidaridad | 93,800 |
Honduras: USAID match for water fund | 75,000 |
Mexico: Mexico government RGRB | 50,000 |
Honduras: FIHA | 50,000 |
Honduras: SAB Miller sugarcane | 50,000 |
Mexico: Secretary of environment RGRB | 37,000 |
U.S.: CONANP | 35,000 |
Turkey: UNDP match | 26,715 |
TOTAL | 22,062,115 |
Exhibit 15.5: Global Reach of Coca-Cola and WWF, 2012
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brownlee, E.R., Dmytriyev, S., Elias, A. (2017). Integrative Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Oriented Partnership Between the Coca-Cola Company and World Wildlife Fund. In: Freeman, R., Kujala, J., Sachs, S. (eds) Stakeholder Engagement: Clinical Research Cases. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62784-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62785-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)