Abstract
Although theoretical underpinnings of stakeholder dialog (SD) have been extensively discussed in the extant literature, there is a lack of empirical studies presenting evidence on the SD initiatives undertaken by firms. In this article, we provide information about 294 SD initiatives collected through a content analysis of the sustainability reports published by large firms in Germany, Italy, and the U.S. In addition to a country-based description of the different forms, stakeholder categories, and topics of the SD initiatives, we explore the relationship between SD and characteristics of national business systems. Overall, we find firms undertake few SD initiatives, using low-involvement forms of dialog, and focusing on one category of stakeholders per initiative. Results suggest that the explicit approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR) favors the quantity of SD initiatives, but neglects the importance of the level of involvement and diversity of stakeholders participating at the dialog. Finally, we find public policies on CSR have a substantial influence on SD in national business systems with an implicit approach to CSR. Public policies based on a shared discussion involving multiple social actors encourage SD initiatives that use different forms of dialog and are characterized by high level of involvement. Our findings offer contributions to the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of SD and its relationship with CSR.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- SD:
-
Stakeholder dialog
- CSR:
-
Corporate social responsibility
- SDI:
-
Stakeholder Diversity Index
- FDI:
-
Form Diversity Index
References
Accountability: 2007, Accountability rating, (Accountability, London).
Adams, C. A. and G. Harte: 1999, Towards Corporate Accountability for Equal Opportunities Performance, (Certified Accountants Education Trust, London).
Adams, C. A., W. Y. Hill and C. B. Roberts: 1995, Environmental, Employee and Ethical Reporting in Europe, (Certified Accountants Educational Trust, London).
Albareda, L., J.M. Lozano, A. Tencati, A. Midttun, and Francesco Perrinin: 2008, ‘The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: drivers and responses’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 347-363.
Albareda, L., A. Tencati, J.M. Lozano and F. Perrini: 2006, ‘The government’s role in promoting corporate responsibility: a comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective’, Corporate Governance 6(4), 386-400.
Barnett, M. L.: 2007, ‘Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 794-816.
Barnett, M. L. and R. Salomon: 2006, ‘Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance’, Strategic Management Journal 27(11), 1101-1122.
Bertelsmann Foundation and GTZ: 2007, The CSR Navigator – Public Policies in Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe (Bertelsmann Foundation & GTZ, Eschborn). http://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de. Accessed 3 October 2009.
Boesso, G. and K. Kumar: 2009, ′Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: Evidence from Italy and the US′, Accounting Forum 33, 162-175.
Buehler, V. M. and Y. K. Shetty: 1974, ‘Motivations for Corporate Social Action’, The Academy of Management Journal 17(4), 767-771.
Burchell, J. and J. Cook: 2006a, ‘Assessing the impact of stakeholder dialogue: changing relationships between NGOs and companies’, Journal of Public Affairs 6, 210-227.
Burchell, J. and J. Cook: 2006b, ‘It′s Good to Talk? Examining attitudes towards corporate social responsibility dialogue and engagement processes’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(2), 154-170.
Burchell, J. and J. Cook: 2008, ‘Stakeholder dialogue and organizational learning: changing relationships between companies and NGOs’, Business Ethics: A European Review 17(1), 35-46.
Chen, S. and P. Bouvain: 2008, ‘Is Corporate Responsibility Converging? A Comparison of Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany’, Journal of Business Ethics 87, 299-317.
CNN Money: 2009, Global 500 – Annual Ranking of the World’s Largest Corporations. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2009/countries/Germany.html. Accessed 8 October 2009.
Coombs, J. and K. M. Gilley: 2005, ‘Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation’, Strategic Management Journal 26, 827-840.
Davenport, K.: 2000, ‘Corporate citizenship: A stakeholder approach for defining corporate social performance and identifying measures for assessing it’, Business and Society 39(2), 210-219.
Deegan, C.: 2002, ‘The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures - a theoretical foundation’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(3), 282-311.
Epstein, M. J. and M. J. Roy: 2003, ′Improving Sustainability Performance: Specifying, Implementing and Measuring Key Principles′, Journal of General Management 29(1), 15-31.
European Commission: 2003, SMEs in Europe 2003 (Enterprise Publications, Luxembourg).
European Union (2002) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development. Employment and Social Affairs Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Farrell, B. J. and D. M. Cobbin: 1996, ‘A Content Analysis of Codes of Ethics in Australian Enterprises’, Journal of Managerial Psychology 11(1), 37-55.
Federal Statistical Office: 2008, Statistical Yearbook 2008, (Federal Statistical Office, Wiesbaden).
Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, (Pitman Publishing Inc, Massachusetts).
Frooman, J.: 1999, ‘Stakeholder influence strategies’, Academy of Management Review 24, 191-205.
Gray, R., R. Kouhy and S. Lavers: 1995, ‘Methodological Themes. Constructing a Research Database of Social and Environmental Reporting by UK Companies, Accounting’, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8(2), 78-101.
Greenwood, M.: 2007, ‘Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 74, 315-327.
Habisch, A. and J. Moon: 2006, ′Social Capital and Corporate Social Responsibility′, in: Jonker, J. and M. de Witte: Eds., The challenge of organising and implementing CSR, (Palgrave, London), 63-77.
Habisch, A. and M. Wegner: 2005, ′Germany - Overcoming the Heritage of Corporatism′, in: Habisch, A., J. Jonker, M. Wegner and R. Schmidpeter: Eds., Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe, (Springer, Heidelberg).
Hackston, D. and M. J. Milne: 1996, ‘Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9(1), 77-108.
Hammann, E., Habisch, A. & Pechlaner, H.(2009) ‘Values that create value: socially responsible business practices in SMEs - empirical evidence from German companies’, Business Ethics: A European Review 18(1), 37-51.
Harrison, J. S. and R. E. Freeman: 1999, ‘Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives’, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 479-485.
Hendry, J. R.: 2005, ‘Stakeholder Influence Strategies: An Empirical Exploration’, Journal of Business Ethics 61, 79-99.
Hess, D.: 2007, ‘Social Reporting and New Governance Regulation: The prospects of achieving Corporate Accountability through Transparency’, Business Ethics Quarterly 17(3), 453-476.
Hess, D.: 2008, ‘The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation: Disclosure, Dialogue and Development’, Business Ethics Quarterly 18(4), 447-482.
Hillman, A. J. and G. D. Keim: 2001, ‘Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: what’s the bottom line?’, Strategic Management Journal 22, 125-139.
Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Holder-Webb, L. and J. R. Cohen: 2007, ‘The association between disclosure, distress, and failure’, Journal of Business Ethics 75(1), 301-314.
Hussain, S. S.: 1999, ′The Ethics of ′Going Green′: The Corporate Social Responsibility Debate′, Business Strategy and the Environment 8, 203-210.
Institute for Ecological Economy Research, Future e. V.: 2007, Sustainability Reporting in Germany. Results and Trends in the Ranking 2007, (Institute for Ecological Economy Research and Future e. V., Berlin).
International Monetary Fund: 2009a, World economic outlook database April 2009, (International Monetary Fund, Italy).
International Monetary Fund: 2009b, World Economic Outlook Database October 2009, (International Monetary Fund, Germany).
Kassinis, G. and N. Vafeas: 2006, ‘Stakeholder Pressures and Environmental Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 49(1), 145-159.
KPMG: 2005, International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005, (KMPG Global Sustainability Services, Amsterdam).
KPMG: 2008, KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008, (KPMG International, Amsterdam).
Lawrence, A. T.: 2002, ′The drivers of stakeholder engagement: reflections on the case of Royal Dutch/Shell′, in: Sutherland Rahman, S., S. Waddock, J. Andriof, and B. Husted: Eds., Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility, Engagement (Sheffield: Greenleaf).
Maignan, I. and D. A. Ralston: 2002, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-Representations’, Journal of International Business Studies 33(3), 497-514.
Marcuccio, M. and I. Steccolini: 2005, ‘Social and Environmental Reporting in Local Authorities. A new Italian Fashion?’, Public Management Review 7(2), 155-176.
Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2008, ‘“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility′, Academy of Management Review 33(2), 404-424.
McLaren, D.: 2004, ‘Global Stakeholders: corporate accountability and investor engagement’, Corporate Governance: An International Review 12(2), 191-201.
Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining The Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-886.
Morsing M. and M. Schultz: 2006, ‘Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4), 323-338.
O’Riordan, L. and J. Fairbrass: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR: Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue’, Journal of Business Ethics 83, 745-758.
Observatory of European SMEs: 2002, European SMEs and social environmental responsibility (Brussels: European Commission).
OECD: 2009, Factbook - Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics, (OECD, Paris).
Owen, D. L., T. Swift and K. Hunt: 2001, ′Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting′, Accounting Forum 25(3), 264-282.
Patelli, L. and A. Prencipe: 2007, `The Relationship Between Voluntary Disclosure and Independent Directors in Presence of a Dominant Shareholder', European Accounting Review 16(1), 5–33.
Payne, S. L., J. M. Calton (2002) Towards a Managerial Practice of Stakeholder Engagement: Developing Multi-Stakeholder Learning Dialogues. In: S. Sutherland Rahman, S. Waddock, J. Andriof, B. Husted (Eds.) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility, Engagement. Greenleaf, Sheffield.
Pedersen, E. R.: 2006, ‘Making Corporate Responsibility: CSR) Operable: How Companies Translate Stakeholder Dialogue into Practice’, Business and Society Review 111(2), 137-163.
Perrini, F.: 2006, ‘SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 67, 305-316.
Perrini, F., S. Pogutz, and A. Tencati: 2006, ‘Corporate social responsibility in Italy: state of the art’, Journal of Business Strategies 23(1), 1-44.
Pleon: 2004, Geheime Mission? Deutsche Unternehmen im Dialog mit kritischen Stakeholdern. Eine Umfrage unter den 150 grössten Unternehmen [Secret Mission? German Companies in Dialogue with Critical Stakeholders. A Survey Among 150 Largest Companies] (Pleon, Bonn).
Russo, A. and A. Tencati: 2009, ‘Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence From Italian Micro, Small, Medium-sized, and Large Firms’, Journal Of Business Ethics 85, 339-353.
Sillanpää, M.: 1998, ′The Body Shop Values Report - Towards Integrated Stakeholder Auditing′, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1443-1456.
Spence, L., A. Habisch and R. Schmidpeter: Eds.: 2004, Social Capital and Responsibility - The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (PalgraveMcMillan, Hampshire).
Steurer, R.: 2010, ‘The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterising public policies on CSR in Europe’, Policy Sciences, 43, 49-72
Swift, T.: 2001, ′Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders′, Business Ethics: A European Review 10(1), 16-26.
Tonkin, D. J. and L. C. L. Skerratt: 1991, Financial Reporting 1991-1992: A Survey of UK Reporting practice, (ICAEW, London).
Van Buren, H., III: 2001, ‘If Fairness is the Problem, is Consent the Solution? Integrating ISCT and Stake- holder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 11(3), 481– 499.
Weaver, G., L. Trevino and P. Cochran: 1999, ‘Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: A management commitments, external pressures and corporate ethics practices’, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 539-552.
Weber, R. P.: 1988, Basic Content Analysis, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 7-049, (Sage, Beverly Hills, London).
Whitley, R. (1999), Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Williams, R.C.: 2007, The Cooperative Movement, (Ashgate Publishing, Hampshire).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0715-7
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Habisch, A., Patelli, L., Pedrini, M. et al. Different Talks with Different Folks: A Comparative Survey of Stakeholder Dialog in Germany, Italy, and the U.S.. J Bus Ethics 100, 381–404 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0686-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0686-8