Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) provide two noninvasive methods to learn about the spatial and temporal behavior of neuronal currents. In this tutorial chapter, we present the physics and mathematics needed to interpret such measurements. The frequencies present in neuronal activity are sufficiently low that Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetism can be approximated by omitting the terms involving time derivatives. In this “quasistatic” approximation, the electric and magnetic fields follow the time dependence of the neuronal current. The “forward problem” consists of solving for these fields on the surface of the scalp and just outside the head, for any assumed neuronal current distribution. It requires a knowledge of the “head model,” namely, the shapes and electrical conductivities of the main head compartments, i.e., the brain, skull, and scalp, and possibly the cerebrospinal fluid. Analytical and numerical methods for doing this are discussed. In the “inverse problem,” one tries to deduce the neuronal current distribution from EEG and/or MEG measurements on human subjects. The factors that contribute to the nonuniqueness of the solution are discussed, and the methods that are actually employed to obtain current distributions are described. The standard procedure is to assume one or more current distributions, solve the forward problem for each one, and compare them with the data. Various criteria for calculating how well they agree are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achim A, Recher F, Saint-Hilaire J-M (1991) Methodical consideration for the evaluation of spatio-temporal source models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 79:227–240
Baillet S, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (2001) Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Process Mag 18(6):14–30
Barnard A, Duck I, Lynn M (1967) The application of electromagnetic theory to electrocardiology. I derivation of the integral equations. Biophys J 7:443–462
Baumann S, Wozny D, Kelly S, Meno F (1997) The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44(3):220–223
Brenner D, Lipton J, Kaufman L, Williamson S (1978) Somatically evoked magnetic fields of the human brain. Science 199:81–83
Bronzan J (1971) The magnetic scalar potential. Am J Phys 39:1357–1359
Chen W, Wong KM, Reilly JP (1991) Detection of number of signals: a predicted eigen-threshold approach. IEEE Signal Process 39:1088–1098
Cohen D, Cuffin BN (1991) EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment. Brain Topogr 4:95–103
Cramer H (1946) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Cuffin BN, Cohen D (1977) Magnetic fields of a dipole in special volume conductor shapes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 24:372–381
Geselowitz D (1967) On bioelectric potentials in an inhomogeneous volume conductor. Biophys J 7(1):1–11
Geselowitz D (1970) On the magnetic field generated outside an inhomogeneous volume conductor by internal current sources. IEEE Trans Magn 6(2):346–347
Grynszpan F, Geselowitz DB (1973) Model studies of the magnetocardiogram. Biophys J 13:911–925
Hämäläinen M, Sarvas J (1989) Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans Biomad Eng 36:165–171
Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV (1993) Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Revs Mod Phys 65(2):413–497
Heller L, van Hulsteyn D (1992) Brain stimulation using electromagnetic sources: theoretical aspects. Biophys J 63(1):129–138
Heller L, Ranken DM, Best E (2004) The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:1310–1318
Helmholtz HV (1853) Uber einige gesetze der vertheilung elektrischer strome in korperlichen leitern, mit anwendung auf die thierisch-elektrischen versuche. Ann Phys Chem 89:211–233, 353–377
Huang M, Aine CJ, Supek S, Best E, Ranken D, Flynn ER (1998) Multi-start downhill simplex method for spatio-temporal source localization in magnetoencephalography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:32–44
Huang MX, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (1999) A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. Phys Med Biol 44:423–440
Huang M, Davis LE, Aine C, Weisend M, Harrington D, Christener R, Stephen J, Edgar JC, Herman M, Meyer J, Paulson K, Martin K, Lee RR (2004) MEG response to median nerve stimulation correlates with recovery of sensory and motor function after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 115:820–833
Ilmoniemi R, Hamalainen MS, Knuutila J (1985) The forward and inverse problems in the spherical model. In: Weinberg H, Stroink G, Katila T (eds) Proceedings of biomagnetism: applications and theory journal. Pergamon, New York, pp 278–282
Kraus RH, Volegov P, Maharajh K, Espy MA, Matlashov AN, Flynn ER (2002) Performance of a novel squid-based superconducting imaging-surface magnetoencephalography system. Physica C 368:18–23
Levenberg K (1944) A method for the solution of certain problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 2:164–168
Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J Appl Math 11:431–441
Medvick P, Lewis P, Aine C, Flynn E (1989) Monte Carlo analysis of localization errors in magnetoencephalography. In: Williamson SJ, Hoke M, Stroink G, Kotani M (eds) Advances in biomagnetism. Plenum, New York, pp 543–546
Mosher JC, Spencer ME, Leahy RM, Lewis PC (1992) Error bounds for MEG and EEG source localization. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 86:303–321
Nelder JA, Mead RA (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313
Oostendorp T, Delbeke J, Stegman D (2000) The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47(11):1487–1492
Plis SM, George JS, Jun SC, Ranken DM, Volegov PL, Schmidt DM (2007) Probabalistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis. Phys Med Biol 52:5309–5327
Ranken DM, George J (1993) MRIVIEW: an interactive computational tool for investigation of brain structure and function. In: Proceedings of IEEE visualization, vol 93. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 324–331
Ranken D, Best E, Schmidt D, George J, Wood C, Huang M (2002) MEG/EEG forward and inverse modeling using mri view. In: Nowak H, Haueisen J, Giebler F, Juonker R (eds) Proceedings of the 13th international conference on biomagnetism, pp 324–331
Ranken D, Stephen J, George J (2004) MUSIC seeded multi-dipole MEG modeling using the constrained start spatio-temporal modeling procedure. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol 80:1–6
Rao R (1945) Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters. Bull Calcutta Math Soc 37:81–91
Rush S, Driscoll D (1969) EEG electrode sensitivity–an application of reciprocity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 16(1):15–22
Sarvas J (1987) Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 32(1):11–22
Schlitt HA, Heller L, Aaron R, Best E, Ranken DM (1995) Evaluation of boundary element methods for the eeg forward problem: effect of linear interpolation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42(1):52–58
Supek S, Aine CJ (1993) Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagmetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40:459–540
Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solution of ill-posed problems. Winston & Sons, Washington
Tomita S, Kajihara S, Kondo Y, Yoshida Y, Shibata K, Kado H (1996) Influence of head model in biomagnetic source localization. Brain Topog 8:337–340
Tucker DM (1993) Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 87(3):154–163
van Oosterom A, Strackee J (1983) The solid angle of a plane triangle. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 30:125
Vladimirov VS (1971) Equations of mathematical physics. Marcel Dekker, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Heller, L., Volegov, P. (2019). Electric and Magnetic Fields of the Brain. In: Supek, S., Aine, C. (eds) Magnetoencephalography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_3-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_3-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62657-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62657-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering