Abstract
Introduction: Surgical anterior decompression is the treatment of choice for symptomatic irreducible ventral craniovertebral junction (CVJ) compression. Along with the classic transoral approach, the endoscopic endonasal approach has evolved and is gaining growing success.
Materials and Methods: In this work we discuss the surgical technique, give a complete step-by-step description of dissection of the craniovertebral junction and report a specific case of endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy with use of a high-definition (HD) three-dimensional (3D) endoscope.
Discussion: The extended endonasal approach exploits an anatomical corridor to the odontoid process, involving only a small incision in the nasopharynx and sparing palate integrity. The most important limitation of the technique is 2D visualization, which hinders correct recognition of anatomical structures.
Conclusion: The endoscopic endonasal route to the odontoid process has proven to be a feasible, safe and well-tolerated procedure. Anatomical study is very important for better understanding of the 3D anatomy of the CVJ and relation of critical neurovascular structures to specific bony and muscular landmarks.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) is a complex transition area between the skull and the upper cervical spine, and it provides stability and motion [1,2,3]. Biomechanical studies have confirmed that the majority of spine flexion, extension and rotation occur at this level [4,5,6]. Moreover, vital neurological and vascular structures are housed in the CVJ. Different pathologies may affect the CVJ, leading to impairment/limitation of its physiological function with loss of mobility and eventually compression of neurovascular structures. Prompt surgical intervention is required when these disorders cause symptomatic high spinal cord or brainstem compression. Focusing on the pathology of the odontoid process, if such disorders are not treated, they may cause ventral brainstem and spinal cord compression with subsequent neurological deficits. In addition, if the ligaments are disrupted (especially the transverse ligament), instability and subassial atlo-occipital dislocation may occur. Rheumatoid arthritis, metastasis and congenital deformities represent the most frequent disorders involving the CVJ and the odontoid process [7]. In cases of irreducible ventral compression at the CVJ, anterior approaches offer direct access to the lesion without the need for neural tissue retraction, with a consequently low rate of lower cranial nerve injury [8]. Along with the classic transoral approach, the endoscopic endonasal approach has evolved and is gaining growing success. The latter, in fact, has been shown to be safe and effective, avoiding the need for tongue retraction, upper airway swelling, and the need for palate splitting [9]. The surgical field has anatomical limits dictated by the osseous structures of the region (the nasal and palatine bones), which form two lines: the Kassam line and the nasoaxial line, which define a triangle-shaped surgical corridor [10]. The most important limitation of the technique is two-dimensional (2D) visualization, which hinders correct recognition of anatomical structures. The high-definition (HD) 3D endoscope is a new instrument that overcomes this problem, thus giving the transnasal approach enormous and growing importance in surgery in this region [11, 12]. This paper discusses our experience with the extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the craniovertebral junction, using a specific case to provide a complete step-by-step description of the surgical technique used for the dissection, and discusses the advantages and limitations of this approach.
Dissection
Access to the foramen magnum and the CVJ requires a low trajectory in comparison with sellar approaches [13]. The posterior nasal septum, inferior sphenoid wall and vomer are removed so the rhinopharyngeal part of the clivus can be reached [14]. The inferior third of the clivus is drilled away to improve the exposure of anterior CVJ. The lateral limits of the exposure are determined by the carotid protuberance, foramen lacerum, vidian canal and Eustachian tube. The nasopharyngeal mucosa is removed, widely exposing the underlying basipharyngeal fascia and the median raphe covering the prevertebral muscles (Fig. 1). Two muscles cover this area anterior to the foramen magnum and extend from the clivus downward: the longus capitis and rectus capitis anterior (RCpA). The longus capitis is removed and has multiple bellies (Fig. 1). The atlanto-occipital membrane (AOM) is a broad fibrous structure, which extends from the anterior edge of the foramen magnum to the superior edge of the anterior arch of the atlas (Fig. 2). The median raphe is a band of connective tissue, which is attached to the clivus and continues as the anterior longitudinal ligament (Fig. 2). It is necessary to remove the AOM and the anterior median raphe to expose the foramen magnum and the anterior arch of C1 (Fig. 3). The alar and apical ligaments are located within the space between the foramen magnum and the anterior arch of C1. To view the odontoid process and the ligaments it is necessary to partly remove the anterior arch of C1 (Fig. 3). The atlas has two lateral masses: an anterior arch with a midline anterior tubercle, and a posterior surface (Fig. 3). The alar ligaments are fibrous bands arising from the lateral surface of the odontoid process and ascending toward the alar tubercle on the medial side of the occipital condyles (Fig. 3). The apical ligament of the odontoid process has a cartilaginous base arising from the apex of the dens and coming up to the anterior edge of the foramen magnum. The posterior surface of the dens also has a posterior facet, which articulates with the cartilaginous facet on the anterior surface of the cruciform ligament (Fig. 4). The anterior cortical surface and the core of the dens are drilled, leaving only a thin shell of bone, which can be removed with rongeurs. Removal of the dens exposes a thick, strong, white band called the transverse ligament, which arches posteriorly the dens and holds it in position. It extends from the tubercles on the medial side of the lateral mass of the atlas (Fig. 4). The transverse ligament is the horizontal part of the cruciform ligament, which has two upper and lower vertical bands. The tectorial membrane, a broad fibrous band that spans the area between the medial edges of the occipital condyles, is a rostral extension of the posterior longitudinal ligament, which attaches to the axis inferiorly and the clivus superiorly (Fig. 4). It is separated from the dura by the epidural venous plexus. Once the dura is opened, the junction of the spinal canal with the medulla, which is defined as being at the level of the origin of the C1 ventral root, is exposed.
Case Illustration
The patient was a 71-year-old woman affected by an odontoid lesion. Because of radiological evidence of C1 myelopathy associated with both lower and upper limb weakness, she had undergone posterior C1–C2 laminectomy in November 2010 at another hospital.
After some months of disease stability she experienced worsening of limb weakness, with development of spastic paraparesis and gait impairment. Her reflexes were overreactive. She also complained of paraesthesia. Brain–cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Fig. 5a, b) and computed tomography (CT) scanning (Fig. 6a, b) were performed. The radiological exams showed worsening of myelopathy without lesion growth.
Therefore, the patient underwent endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy. The surgical procedure was uneventful, and postoperative CT scanning confirmed the success of the procedure. After 1 week a posterior C0–C2 arthrodesis was performed with an occipital plate and a C2 transcortical screw. Another cervical spine CT scan was performed to check for correct screw positioning.
The hospital stay was uneventful, and the patient was discharged after the second surgery. The histological diagnosis was an odontoid G2 chondrosarcoma. An intensive rehabilitation programme was useful to help the patient to reduce her gait impairment. MRI (Fig. 5c, d) and CT scans (Fig. 6c, d) were performed postoperatively, showing complete decompression of the dura. After 6 months a large area of arthrodesis was evident.
Surgical Technique
The procedure was performed with the assistance of neurophysiological monitoring. Somatosensory and motor-evoked potential data were collected for the patient. The surgical team was composed of a neurosurgeon and an ear, nose and throat surgeon. The surgery was done with a Visionsense III, 3D endoscope (Visionsense Ltd, Petach Tikva, Israel). Everyone in the surgical theatre wore passive polarized glasses to obtain a stereoscopic view [15, 16].
The patient was placed in a supine position with the head fixed in a three-pin head holder (Mayfield Infinity Skull Clamp; Integra LifeSciences Corporation. We positioned the head slightly tilted to the left on the coronal plane and slightly flexed to slide up the dens. All positioning manoeuvres were performed under neurophysiological monitoring. The nasal cavities were prepared preoperatively with 2 mL of 10% carbocaine (mepivacaine) with adrenaline, which was applied topically with patties. A binostril 4-hand technique was used routinely. Once the surgeons entered the right nostril, the inferior and middle turbinates were displaced laterally to widen the surgical corridor (Figs. 7 and 8). The inferior margin of the middle turbinate, the nasopharynx, and the Eustachian tubes were the surgical landmarks that led the surgeons to the craniocervical junction. We usually do not remove the turbinates to preserve physiological airflow. The inferior margin of the middle turbinate was then followed until the nasopharyngeal cavity was entered. To enable use of both nostrils, the posterior third of the nasal septum was removed (Fig. 9). The junction between the clivus and the atlas was grossly defined by a line connecting the Eustachian tubes. The anatomical boundaries of the surgical field were defined by the floor of the sphenoidal sinus superiorly, the upper part of the oropharynx inferiorly, and the Eustachian tubes and the fossa of Rosenmüller laterally. The neuronavigation system provided significant help for identification of the anatomy at this point, especially concerning the vertical tracts of the internal carotid arteries. An inverted U-shaped flap of nasopharyngeal mucosa and muscular layers was harvested with the laser (CH fibre laser; Dornier MedTech, Munich, Germany) (Fig. 9). The Eustachian tubes had to be considered the most lateral margin of the incision because they identified the parapharyngeal segment of the carotid artery. The craniocaudal extension of the flap involved the inferior third of the clivus superiorly and the C2 vertebral body inferiorly, and the lateral margin of the surgical exposure included the lateral masses of the C1 vertebra. Skeletonization of the anterior arch of C1 and the odontoid process was then carried out in a subperiosteal fashion. The lowest part of the clivus and the C1 anterior arch were then removed [17].
We checked the correct surgical position with the navigation system. A 3-mm coarse diamond burr was used to enter the anterior cortex of the odontoid process (extra-long high-speed microdrill; The Anspach Effort, Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA). We proceeded with excision of pathological tissue between the odontoid process and the dura of the pontomedullary junction. An ultrasonic bone curette was then used to remove the tip of the odontoid process (Sonopet Omni ultrasonic surgical system; Stryker, Inc., Kalamazoo, MI, USA). Finally, the residual shell of the odontoid process could be removed by sectioning of the apical and alar ligaments, and separation of the process from adhesions to surrounding tissues [18].
Exposition of the dura anterior to the pontomedullary junction that was covered by inflammatory tissue. At the end of the procedure, image guidance was helpful for assessment of the effectiveness of the decompression. Furthermore, the integrity and the pulsatility of the dura were checked to rule out the risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage.
After the procedure, the inverted U-shaped mucosal nasopharyngeal flap that had been harvested at the beginning of the procedure was retrieved to cover the surgical cavity and fixed with fibrin glue. A Foley catheter was used to hold it in place for 2 days to promote the healing process. Both nostrils were packed with nasal swabs.
Discussion
‘Craniovertebral junction’ is a collective term that refers to the occipital bone, atlas and axis with supporting ligaments and membranes that provide stability and mobility to this critical crossroads of the central nervous system at the brainstem transition to the spinal cord. Different surgical approaches have been described for exposing the CVJ, depending on the location of the pathology. If irreducible ventral compression of the brainstem occurs, an anterior route is the gold standard for obtaining straightforward access to the lesion without the need for neural tissue retraction [19]. The transoral, endonasal and transcervical approaches represent the three main options for performing odontoidectomy [4, 5, 8, 20]. The first approach to be reported was the transoral–transpharyngeal route to the ventral CVJ, described by Kanavel in 1917 [21]. Despite the wide surgical exposition (from the clivus to C2–C3) provided by this approach, it carries the risk of bacterial contamination, prolonged postoperative intubation, nasogastric tube feeding, tongue swelling and nasopharyngeal incompetence after transoral surgery [22]. The refinement of transsphenoidal endoscopic approaches to midline skull base lesions has led to the introduction of an endonasal route as a less invasive approach to the CVJ [23,24,25]. The extended endonasal approach exploits an anatomical corridor to the odontoid process, involving only a small incision in the nasopharynx and sparing palate integrity, without exposure to saliva and oropharyngeal bacteria, and therefore with a theoretically lower infectious risk [24, 26]. The endoscopic approach can provide access to the entire skull base, extending from the anterior cranial fossa to the body of C2 on the midline. The lateral exposure is limited here by the Eustachian tube, medial pterygoid plates and paraclival internal carotid arteries (ICAs). The muscles of the ventral CVJ are thin and have an avascular plane on the midline that can be used to retract them laterally or remove them as a U-shaped flap for later reconstruction. The anterior tubercle of C1 is a useful midline landmark, which can be confirmed with image guidance. A cadaver study by Baird et al. [27], comparing the endonasal, transoral and transcervical endoscopic approaches, showed that the EEA offers a shorter distance to the surgical target. Moreover, with the endonasal approach, the trajectory is entirely top down; thus, it is favourable to achieve better control of the drill and advantageous for detaching the ligaments while performing clivus and odontoid resection [27]. In addition, the endoscope provides superior visualization and a larger optical field than the microscope does, which has turned out to be particularly advantageous in this deep surgical field. As highlighted by Ponce-Gómez et al. [3] in the odontoidectomy setting, the views differ between the endoscope and the microscope, and in such a narrow working area, movements are more fluent and faster with an endoscope. 3D endoscopes, which provide depth perception, may further improve the precision and safety of surgical manoeuvres [11, 15].
Maintenance of CVJ stability is another major issue to consider while performing surgical procedures at this level. Preservation of anterior C1 arch continuity by resection of only the odontoid process and pathological tissue—when feasible—reduces the risk of spinal biomechanical instability and the need for posterior fusion [9, 15]. One of the main criticisms of the EEA to the upper cervical spine is the limited exposure inferiorly. The K line, also known as the nasopalatine line (NPL), provides a window of caudal exposure inferior to the horizontal plane of the hard palate. As De Almeida et al. [26] demonstrated in their work describing extrapolation of the NPL to the vertebral column, the most inferior limit of dissection with endoscopic instruments is about 8.9 mm above the base of the C2 vertebral body. These findings suggest that while removal of the C2 body cannot be performed with the EEA, odontoidectomy usually is feasible with the EEA. It is currently thought that the surgical approach has to be tailored to the unique anatomical setting of each patient and the features of the lesion. On the basis of our own surgical experience, drilling of the inferior nasal spine, located between the soft and the hard palate, can be useful to widen the route of access to the CVJ, to gain more caudal access [16]. Further inferior dissection may require the use of angled instruments or a transoral approach [26]. Another drawback of the EEA may be the steep and long learning curve that this complex approach requires. Last—but not least—for a skull base neurosurgeon, being familiar with the EEA means not only being able to perform it but also being able to deal effectively with the complications that may derive from this approach.
A recent review by Shriver et al. [6] stated that postoperative CSF leakage rates are higher after the EEA than after the transoral approach. This systematic review, comparing complications associated with transoral and transnasal odontoidectomy, reported intraoperative CSF leakage rates of 0.3% and 30%, respectively, and postoperative CSF leakage rates of 0.8% and 5.2%, respectively. CSF leaks, if not properly treated, may lead to meningitis. Therefore, a skull base neurosurgeon dealing with the EEA should be prepared to deal with complex CSF leaks.
We performed the approach using a Visionsense III 3D endoscope. The relative importance of the 3D view depends on the relative increase in the depth of field it provides in comparison with a 2D endoscope. In 2012, Castelnuovo et al. [28] described one case of transnasal resection of an anterior skull base malignancy with a 3D endoscope. They reported that the surgeons were able to recognize and manage anatomical structures, and control bleeding easily, thanks to use of a bimanual technique and 3D visualization. Probably the most fascinating potential of 3D vision is the ability to control the anatomical structures that are present but not usually and easily visible. The addition of depth perception allows us to overcome the limitations of 2D, making the new 3D endoscopic system an ideal tool for a wide range of procedures. Finally, the accuracy of the visualization of the anatomical structures and their relationships makes the 3D endoscope a versatile tool, which entails a shorter learning curve than the traditional 2D endoscope [12].
Conclusion
The endoscopic endonasal route to the odontoid process has proven to be a feasible, safe and well-tolerated procedure. Anatomical study is mandatory for better understanding of the three-dimensional anatomy of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) and relation of critical neurovascular structures to specific bony and muscular landmarks. Endoscopic relation of CVJ anatomy is difficult and complex, and cadaver studies help to ensure safety and control during surgical procedures. Anatomical knowledge and dissection in the cadaver laboratory will help future neurosurgeons to develop approaches, facilitate safe surgery and reduce the current limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the CVJ: the caudal exposure limited by nasal and palatine bony and soft tissues. The advantages of the endoscopic endonasal approach are the location of the incision (in the nasopharynx rather than in the oropharynx) and the wider, closer and brighter view provided by the endoscope. High-definition three-dimensional endoscopes, lasers and ultrasound bony curettes have been shown to be useful tools for this approach.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No financial support was received for this work.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Lopez AJ, Scheer JK, Leibl KE, Smith ZA, Dlouhy BJ, Dahdale NS. Anatomy and biomechanics of the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38:E2.
Menezes AH, Traynelis VC. Anatomy and biomechanics of normal craniovertebral junction (a) and biomechanics of stabilization (b). Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24:1091–100.
Ponce-Gómez JA, Ortega-Porcayo LA, Soriano-Barón HE, Sotomayor-González A, Arriada-Mendicoa N, Gómez-Amador JL, Palma-Díaz M, Barges-Coll J. Evolution from microscopic transoral to endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(4):E15.
Dickman CA, Crawford NR, Brantley A, Sonntag V. Biomechanical effects of transoral odontoidectomy. Neurosurgery. 1995;36(6):1146–53.
Naderi S, Crawford NR, Melton MS, et al. Biomechanical analysis of cranial settling after transoral odontoidectomy. Neurosurg Focus. 1999;6:E7.
Shriver MF, Kshettry VR, Sindwani R, Woodard T, Benzel EC, Recino PF. Transoral and transnasal odontoidectomy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;148:121–9.
Nayak JV, Gardner PA, Vescan AD, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH. Experience with the expanded endonasal approach for resection of the odontoid process in rheumatoid disease. Am J Rhinol. 2007;21:601–6.
Steinmetz MP, Mroz TE, Benzel EC. Craniovertebral junction: bio-mechanical considerations. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(3 Suppl):7–12.
A Gladi M, Iacoangeli M, Specchia N, Re M, Dobran M, Alvaro L, Moriconi E, Scerrati M. Endoscopic transnasal odontoid resection to decompress the bulbo-medullary junction: a reliable anterior minimally invasive technique without posterior fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(Suppl 1):S55–60.
Magrini S, Pasquini E, Mazzatenta D, Frank G, et al. Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy in a patient affected by Down syndrome: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:e373–4.
Altieri R, Tardivo V, Pacca P, Pennacchietti V, Penner F, Garbossa D, Ducati A, Garzaro M, Zenga F. 3D HD endoscopy in skull base surgery: from darkness to light. Surg Technol Int. 2016;29:359–65.
Pennacchietti V, Garzaro M, Grottoli S, Pacca P, Garbossa D, Alessandro D, Zenga F. Three-dimensional endoscopic endonasal approach and outcomes in Sellar lesions: a single-center experience of 104 cases. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:121–5.
Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Messina A, Esposito F, Stella L, de Divitiis E, et al. The extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the clivus and cranio-vertebral junction: anatomical study. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23:665–71.
Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F, de Divitiis E, Gardner P, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:1–14.
Zenga F, Marengo N, Pacca P, Pecorari G, Ducati A. C1 anterior arch preservation in transnasal odontoidectomy using three-dimensional endoscope: a case report. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:192.
Zenga F, Pacca P, Tardivo V, Pennacchietti V, Garbossa D, Pecorari G, Ducati A. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the odontoid pathologies. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:394–403.
Agrawal A, Reyes PM. A novel technique of odontoidoplasty and C1 arch reconstruction: anatomical and biomechanical basis. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1 Suppl Operative):103–13.
Zenga F, Villaret AB, Fontanella MM, Nicolai P. Endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy using ultrasonic bone curette: technical case report. Neurol India. 2013;61:69–72.
Jhawar S, Nunez M, Pacca P, Voscoboinik DS, Truong H. Craniovertebral junction 360°: a combined microscopic and endoscopic anatomical study. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2016;7(4):204.
Dasenbrock HH, Clarke MJ, Bydon A, Wolinsky J-P, et al. Endoscopic image-guided transcervical odontoidectomy: outcomes of 15 patients with basilar invagination. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:351–60.
Kanavel AB. Bullet located between the atlas and the base of the skull: technique of removal through the mouth. Surg Clin Chicago. 1917;1:361–6.
Crockard HA. Transoral surgery: some lessons learned. Br J Neurosurg. 1995;9:283–93.
Alfieri A, Jho HD, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral cranio-cervical junction: anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002;144:219–35.
Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R. The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(Suppl 1):E213.
Messina A, Bruno MC, Coste A, Cavallo LM, de Divittis E, Cappabianca P, Tschabitscher M. Pure endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy: anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev. 2007;30(3):189–94.
De Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA, Kassam AB. Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:239–44.
Baird CJ, Conway JE, Sciubba DM, Prevedello DM, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Kassam AB. Radiographic and anatomic basis of endoscopic anterior craniocervical decompression: a comparison of endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(6 Suppl):158–64.
Castelnuovo P, Battaglia P, Bignami M, Dallan I. Endoscopic transnasal resection of anterior skull base malignancy with a novel 3D endoscope and neuronavigation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32:189–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pacca, P., Tardivo, V., Pecorari, G., Garbossa, D., Ducati, A., Zenga, F. (2019). The Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Craniovertebral Junction Pathologies: Surgical Skills and Anatomical Study. In: Visocchi, M. (eds) New Trends in Craniovertebral Junction Surgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 125. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62514-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62515-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)