Abstract
Without audiences, there would be no rhetoric. Understanding audiences, therefore, is essential for understanding rhetoric. If we do not understand when, how and why audiences are influenced by communication, or see how they negotiate and reject rhetorical messages, then we do not understand rhetoric. In light of this, it is surprising that rhetorical scholars have paid so little attention to audiences—or to be more precise: to empirical audiences. This book encourages researchers to do more studies of empirical audiences and their reception of rhetoric. The chapters offer examples of central methods of understanding reception and empirical audiences: historical approaches such as archival-historical methodology and historiography, interviews and focus group research, protocol analysis, ethnographic participation and observation, appropriation as reception and finally triangulation, where the researcher applies several methods in unison. While these methods are common in media studies, anthropology, cultural studies and other fields of research, they are surprisingly rare in rhetorical studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
I thank Richard Toye for this point.
References
Aristotle. n.d. Rhetoric.
Atkinson, Max. 1984. Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill and Wang.
Benbunan-Fich, Raquel. 2001. Using Protocol Analysis to Evaluate the Usability of a Commercial Web Site. Information and Management 39: 151–163.
Bengtsson, Mette. 2014. For borgeren, tilskueren eller den indviede. En praksisorienteret retorisk kritik af avisens politiske kommentarer. PhD diss., University of Copenhagen.
Benoit, William L., and Mary Jeanette Smythe. 2003. Rhetorical Theory as Message Reception: A Cognitive Response Approach to Rhetorical Theory and Criticism. Communication Studies 54 (1): 96–114. doi:10.1080/10510970309363268.
Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1959. Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited. Quarterly Journal of Speech 45 (4): 399–408. doi:10.1080/00335635909382374.
———. 1968. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (1): 1–14.
———. 1980. Functional Communication. In Rhetoric in Transition. Studies in the Nature and Uses of Rhetoric, ed. E.E. White, 21–38. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Black, Edwin. 2013. The Second Persona. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 595–603. New York: Routledge.
Blair, Carole. 2015. “We Are All Just Prisoners Here of Our Own Device” Rhetoric in Speech Communication After Wingspread. In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina.
Blair, Carole, and Neil Michel. 1999. Commemorating in the Theme Park Zone: Reading the Astronauts Memorial. In At the Intersection: Cultural Studies and Rhetorical Studies, ed. Thomas Rosteck, 29–83. New York: Guilford Press.
Booth, Wayne C. 1983. The Rhetoric of Fiction. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1989. Man Cannot Speak for Her. A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric. Vol. 1. New York: Praeger.
Ceccarelli, Leah. 1998. Polysemy: Multiple Meanings in Rhetorical Criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech 84 (4): 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639809384229.
Ceccarelli, Leah. 2001. Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger, and Wilson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Charland, Maurice. 2013. Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Québécois. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 433–447. New York: Routledge.
Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance Theory, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Condit, Celeste. 1990. Rhetorical Criticism and Audiences: The Extremes of McGee and Leff. Western Journal of Speech Communication 54 (3): 330–345. doi:10.1080/10570319009374346.
Condit, Celeste Michelle. 2013. The Rhetorical Limits of Polysemy. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson. New York: Routledge.
Condit, C.M., and M. Williams. 1997. Audience Responses to the Discourse of Medical Genetics: Evidence Against the Critique of Medicalization. Health Communication 9 (3): 219–235.
Drury, Sara A. Mehltretter. 2015. Responses to Rhetoric’s Invitation. An Analysis of the Bush Presidency, the Immigration Debate, and Rhetoric’s Effect. In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck, 139–161. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Eco, Umberto. 1979. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts, Advances in Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Endres, Danielle, Aaron Hess, Samantha Senda-Cook, and Michael K. Middleton. 2016. In Situ Rhetoric: Intersections Between Qualitative Inquiry, Fieldwork, and Rhetoric. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies 16 (6): 511–524. doi:10.1177/1532708616655820.
Ericsson, K. Anders, and Herbert Simon. 1980. Verbal Reports as Data. Psychological Review 87: 215–251.
———. 1984/1993. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Fiske, John. 1986. Television: Polysemy and Popularity. Critical Studies in Media Communication 3 (4): 391–408.
Flick, Uwe. 2014. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Flower, Linda, et al. 1986. Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision. College Composition and Communication 37 (1): 16–55.
Flower, Linda S., and John R. Hayes. 1977. Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process. College English 39 (4): 449–461.
Flower, Linda, and John R. Hayes. 1981. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication 32 (4): 365–387.
Geertz, Clifford. 2000. Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gentikow, Barbara. 1997. Retorikk og resepsjon. Et medievitenskapelig perspektiv. Rhetorica Scandinavica 3: 26–41.
———. 1998. The Contested Power of Persuasion. Nordicom Review 16: 143–158.
Greenwood, Anna, and Andrea Bernardi. 2014. Understanding the Rift, the (Still) Uneasy Bedfellows of History and Organization Studies. Organization 21 (6): 907–932.
Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding/Decoding. In Culture, Media, Language, ed. Stuart Hall. London: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.
Hariman, Robert, and John Louis Lucaites. 2007. No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
———. 2008. Problems and Prospects in the Study of Visual Culture. Review of Communication 8 (1): 16–20. doi:10.1080/15358590701656031.
Hasian, Marouf. 2008. Iconic Materials, Hermeneutics of Faith, and the Postmodern Reproduction of Public Democracies. Review of Communication 8 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/15358590701670412.
Hauser, Gerard A. 2011. Attending the Vernacular: A Plea for an Ethnographic Rhetoric. In The Rhetorical Emergence of Culture, ed. Christian Meyer and Felix Girke, 157–172. New York: Berhahan Books.
Hayes, John R., and Linda Flower. 1977. Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process. College English 39: 449–461.
Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth. 2007. Online Ethos. Retorisk kritik af karakterfremstilling i politikere, bloggere og brugerfællesskabers webretorik. PhD diss., University of Copenhagen.
———. 2008. Online Ethos: Webretorik i politiske kampagner, blogs og wikis. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Holub, Robert C. 2003. Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction. Oxon, England: Routledge.
Houck, Davis W. 2015. Of ‘Very Few Men’ with ‘Unusual Gifts’ and ‘Acute Sensitivity’—Whither Wichelns, Black and Zarefsky? In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects: Past, Present and Future, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck, 282–296. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Houck, Davis W., and Mihaela Nocasian. 2002. FDR’s First Inaugural Address: Text, Context, and Reception. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 5 (4): 649–678.
Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response, Der Akt des Lesens. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. 2012. Lost, Found, and Made: Qualitative Data in the Study of Three-Step Flows of Communication. In The Handbook of Global Media Research, ed. Ingrid Volkmer, 435–450. Aberdeen: Blackwell Publishing.
Kiewe, Amos. 2015. Letters to Franklin D. Roosevelt Following the First Fireside Chat. The Case for Studying Effects. In The Effects of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Effects. Past, Present, Future, ed. Amos Kiewe and Davis W. Houck, 178–192. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2007. Visual Argumentation in Scandinavian Political Advertising. A Cognitive, Contextual and Reception Oriented Approach. Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3–4): 124–132.
———. 2008. Retoriske omstændigheder. Rhetorica Scandinavica 48: 42–63.
———. 2013. Speaking to Europe: A Rhetorical Approach to Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Speech to the EU Parliament, Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
———. 2015a. The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient. Argumentation 29 (2): 197–215. doi:10.1007/s10503-014-9342-2.
———. 2015b. Where Is Visual Argument? In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory, ed. H. Frans van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 107–117. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
———. 2016. Symbolic Condensation and Thick Representation in Visual and Multimodal Communication. Argumentation and Advocacy 52 (4): 265–281.
Kvale, Steinar, and Svend Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Landau, Jamie. 2016. Feeling Rhetorical Critic: Another Affective-Emotional Field Method for Rhetorical Studies. In Text-Field Innovations in Rhetorical Methods, ed. L. McKinnon Sara, Robert Aasen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Lewis, Clayton. 1982. Using the “Thinking Aloud” Method in Cognitive Interface Design. New York: IBM TJ Watson Research Center.
Leavy, Patricia. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford Library of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Livingstone, Sonia. 2004. The Challenge of Changing Audiences. European Journal of Communication 19 (1): 75–86. doi:10.1177/0267323104040695.
Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 1996. Rethinking the Focus Group in Media and Communications Research. Journal of Communication 46 (2): 79–98.
McCloskey, Donald N. 1985. The Problem of Audience in Historical Economics: Rhetorical Thoughts on a Text by Robert Fogel. History and Theory 24 (1): 1–22. doi:10.2307/2504940.
McCroskey, James C. 2016. An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
McGee, Michael Calvin. 1990. Text, Context, and the Fragmentation of Contemporary Culture. Western Journal of Communication 54 (3): 274–289.
McKinnon, Sara L., Robert Asen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard. 2016. Text + Field: Innovations in Rhetorical Method. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Meyer, Renate E., Markus A. Höllerer, Dennis Jancsary, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2013. The Visual Dimension in Organizing, Organization, and Organization Research: Core Ideas, Current Developments, and Promising Avenues. The Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 489–555. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.781867.
Middleton, Michael, Aaron Hess, Danielle Endres, and Samantha Senda-Cook. 2015. Participatory Critical Rhetoric: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations for Studying Rhetoric In Situ, Participatory Critical Rhetoric. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Morley, David. 2006. Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review 9: 101–121.
Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop. 2013. The Critique of Vernacular Discourse. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 499–523. New York: Routledge.
Paul, Danette, Davida Charney, and Aimee Kendall. 2001. Moving Beyond the Moment: Reception Studies in the Rhetoric of Science. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15 (3): 372–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190101500305.
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, La nouvelle rhétorique traité de l’argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Radway, Janice. 1988. Reception Study: Ethnography and the Problems of Dispersed Audiences and Nomadic Subjects. Cultural Studies 2 (3): 359–376. doi:10.1080/09502388800490231.
Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.
Schrøder, Kim Christian, Catherine Murray, Kirsten Drotner, and Stephen Kline. 2003. Researching Audiences. London: Arnold.
Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of Politics: Volume 1, Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stromer-Galley, J., and E. Schiappa. 1998. The Argumentative Burdens of Audience Conjectures: Audience Research in Popular Culture Criticism. Communication Theory 8 (1): 27–62.
Thonssen, Lester, and A. Craig Baird. 1948. Speech Criticism. The Development of Standards for Rhetorical Criticism. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
Tindale, Christopher W. 2013. Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience: Toward an Understanding of Audience—Issues in Argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4): 508–532.
———. 2015. The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toye, Richard. 2013. The Roar of the Lion: The Untold Story of Churchill’s World War II Speeches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wander, Philip. 2013. The Third Persona: An Ideological Turn in Rhetorical Theory. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism, ed. Brian L. Ott and Greg Dickinson, 604–623. New York: Routledge.
Whipple, Amy. 2009. Revisiting the “Rivers of Blood” Controversy: Letters to Enoch Powell. Journal of British Studies 48 (3): 717–735. doi:10.1086/598214.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kjeldsen, J.E. (2018). Audience Analysis and Reception Studies of Rhetoric. In: Kjeldsen, J. (eds) Rhetorical Audience Studies and Reception of Rhetoric. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61618-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61618-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61617-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61618-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)