Abstract
Currently there is a shift from product centered enterprises to product-service centered enterprises which rely on a network of customers, suppliers and partners called enterprise ecosystems. This trend also affects the underlying IT architecture which has to integrate and provide software components (e.g. services) as well as hardware components (e.g. sensors) leading to a digital enterprise ecosystem. This digital ecosystem is complex so that modeling approaches which aim on simplifying complexity are eligible for their design and management. In the paper at hand, we show that existing enterprise modeling approaches are inappropriate for modeling digital enterprise ecosystems comprehensively. By using a case-based analysis we sketch extension points for a digital enterprise ecosystem modeling method based on ArchiMate.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Fedaghi, Sabah: Enterprise Architecture: An Alternative to ArchiMate Conceptualization. In: Silhavy, Radek, Silhavy, Petr, Prokopova, Zdenka, Senkerik, Roman, Kominkova Oplatkova, Zuzana (eds.) CSOC 2017. AISC, vol. 575, pp. 68–77. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57141-6_8
Asghar, M.H., Negi, A., Mohammadzadeh, N.: Principle application and vision in internet of things (iot). In: Computing, Communication & Automation (ICCCA), 2015 International Conference on. pp. 427–431. IEEE (2015)
Barbosa, O., Alves, C.: A systematic mapping study on software ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, Brussels, Belgium, June 7th, 2011. pp. 15–26 (2011)
Bock, A., Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling - conceptual foundation and implementation with adoxx. In: Karagiannis, D., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling, Concepts, Methods and Tools, pp. 241–267. Springer (2016)
Bork, D., Fill, H.G.: Formal aspects of enterprise modeling methods: a comparison framework. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on. pp. 3400–3409. IEEE (2014)
Bork, D.: A Development Method for the Conceptual Design of Multi-View Modeling Tools with an Emphasis on Consistency Requirements. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bamberg (2015)
Bork, D.: Using conceptual modeling for designing multi-view modeling tools. In: 21st Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2015, Puerto Rico, August 13–15, 2015. Association for Information Systems (2015)
Buchmann, R.A.: Modeling Product-Service Systems for the Internet of Things: The ComVantage Method. In: Karagiannis, D., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling, pp. 417–437. Springer (2016)
Buchmann, R.A., Karagiannis, D.: Domain-specific diagrammatic modelling: a source of machine-readable semantics for the internet of things. Cluster Computing 20(1), 895–908 (2017)
Chew, E.K.: Service innovation for the digital world. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures 9(1), 70–89 (2015)
Engelsman, W., Jonkers, H., Quartel, D.: Archimate® extension for modeling and managing motivation, principles, and requirements in togaf®. White paper, The Open Group (2011)
Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J., Bork, D.: Tool support for the semantic object model. In: Dimitris Karagiannis, Heinrich C. Mayr, J.M. (ed.) Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling, pp. 291–310. Springer (2016)
Fill, H.G.: Semantic evaluation of business processes using semfis. In: Dimitris Karagiannis, Heinrich C. Mayr, J.M. (ed.) Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling, pp. 149–170. Springer (2016)
Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (memo) conceptual framework and modeling languages. In: System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. pp. 1258–1267. IEEE (2002)
Gericke, A., Fill, H.G., Karagiannis, D., Winter, R.: Situational method engineering for governance, risk and compliance information systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology. p. 24. ACM (2009)
Haren, V.: TOGAF Version 9.1. Van Haren Publishing (2011)
Höfferer, P.: Achieving business process model interoperability using metamodels and ontologies. In: ECIS. pp. 1620–1631 (2007)
Iacob, M.E., Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M.M., Proper, H.A.: ArchiMate 1.0 Specification. Zaltbommel: Van Haren Publishing (2009)
Karagiannis, D., Buchmann, R.A., Burzynski, P., Reimer, U., Walch, M.: Fundamental conceptual modeling languages in omilab. In: Dimitris Karagiannis, Heinrich C. Mayr, J.M. (ed.) Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling, pp. 3–30. Springer (2016)
Karagiannis, Dimitris, Kühn, Harald: Metamodelling Platforms. In: Bauknecht, Kurt, Tjoa, A.Min, Quirchmayr, Gerald (eds.) EC-Web 2002. LNCS, vol. 2455, pp. 182–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.1007/3-540-45705-4_19
Karagiannis, D., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.): Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling, Concepts, Methods and Tools. Springer (2016),. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39417-6
Krogstie, J.: Modeling of digital ecosystems: Challenges and opportunities. In: Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises. pp. 137–145. Springer (2012)
Kurbel, K.E.: Developing Information Systems. Springer (2008)
Lankhorst, M.: Introduction to enterprise architecture. In: Enterprise Architecture at Work, pp. 1–10. Springer (2013)
Liles, D.H., Presley, A.R.: Enterprise modeling within an enterprise engineering framework. In: Proceedings of the 28th conference on Winter simulation. pp. 993–999. IEEE Computer Society (1996)
Lyytinen, K., Rose, G.M.: The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: the case of internet computing in systems development organizations. MIS quarterly pp. 557–596 (2003)
Marshall, C.: Enterprise modeling with UML: designing successful software through business analysis. Addison-Wesley Professional (2000)
Mertins, K., Jochem, R.: Integrated enterprise modeling: method and tool. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin 18(2), 63–66 (1997)
Mylopoulos, J.: Conceptual modelling and Telos. Conceptual Modelling, Databases, and CASE: an Integrated View of Information System Development, New York: John Wiley & Sons pp. 49–68 (1992)
Nachira, F., Dini, P., Nicolai, A.: A network of digital business ecosystems for europe: roots, processes and perspectives. European Commission, Bruxelles, Introductory Paper (2007)
OpenGroup: Archimate standard (2016), accessed: 2017–02-23. http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/toc.html
Panetto, H., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Molina, A.: Enterprise integration and networking: theory and practice. Annual Reviews in Control 36(2), 284–290 (2012)
Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise modeling. Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. Springer 309 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pittl, B., Bork, D. (2017). Modeling Digital Enterprise Ecosystems with ArchiMate: A Mobility Provision Case Study. In: Hara, Y., Karagiannis, D. (eds) Serviceology for Services. ICServ 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10371. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61240-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61240-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61239-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61240-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)