Abstract
Okun’s law indicates the relationship between economic activity and unemployment. It allows quantifying the impact of changes in output on unemployment or the output gap relative to its potential level when idle labor resources vary. Therefore, it is a relevant relationship in macroeconomic terms and a factor to be taken into account in economic policy. In this chapter, the original formulations of Okun and the connection between them are presented, and then, some aspects noted by the extensive literature on the subject that emerged from the original work of Okun will be discussed. Many studies have focused on analyzing and quantifying how different countries, regions, and periods comply with the law, using some of the original formulations of the relationship, but there have also been studies that have contributed critical views and additional elements to take into consideration, questioning, for example, the linear relationship between the variables, the stability of the relationship, and the existence of omitted variables, among other aspects. Second, evidence is shown that indicates a high level of heterogeneity between the results of estimates between countries or regions or within the same country, and the results of some studies that attempt to explain this heterogeneity are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adanu K (2005) A cross-province comparison of Okun’s coefficient for Canada. Appl Econ 37:561–570
Balkrishnan R, Das M, Kannan P (2010) Unemployment dynamics during recessions and recoveries: Okun’s law and beyond. World Economic Outlook (Ch. 3), International Monetary Fund: 69–107
Ball L, Leigh D, Loungani P (2017) Okun’s Law: Fit at 50? J Money, Credit, Bank 49(7):1414–1441
Ball L, Furceri D, Leigh D, Loungani P (2019) Does one law fit all? Cross-country evidence on Okun’s law. Open Econ Rev 30:841–874
Barreto H, Howland F (1993) There are two Okun’s law relationships between output and unemployment, Wabash College
Belmonte A, Polo C (2005) Formulations of Okun’s law and results for Spain. In: Gascón CS, Pérez Fernández J, Tedde de Lorca P (eds) Studies in homage to Luis Ángel Rojo: policies, markets and economic institutions, vol 1, pp 263–294. ISBN 84-7491-764-6
Blanchard O (2017) Macroeconomics. Pearson Education, Madrid. ISBN: 978-1-292-16050-4
Cazes S, Khatiwada S, Malo, M (2012) Employment protection and collective bargaining: beyond the deregulation agenda. Employment working paper 133. ILO
Folawewo AO, Adeboje OM (2017) Macroeconomic determinants of unemployment: empirical evidence from economic community of West African states. African Dev Rev 29:197–210
Freeman D (2000) A regional test of Okun’s law. Int Adv Econ Res 6:557–570
Freeman DG (2001) Panel tests of Okun’s law for ten industrial countries. Econ Inq 39(4):511–523
González J (2002) Labor market flexibility in thirteen Latin American countries and the United States: revisiting and expanding Okun coefficients. Working paper. Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University. No. 136
Gordon RJ (1984) Unemployment and potential output in the 1980s. Brooking Pap Econ Act 2:537–586
Harris R, Silverstone B (2001) Testing for asymmetry in Okun’s law: a cross-country comparison. Econ Bull 5(2):1–13
Herwartz H, Niebuhr A (2007) Determinants of the (un) employment intensity of growth: evidence from a cross section of EU regions. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228779320_Determinants_of_the_un_employment_intensity_of_growth_Evidence_from_a_cross_section_of_EU_regions. Accessed 24 Nov 2022
Herwartz H, Niebuhr A (2011) Growth, unemployment and labor market institutions: evidence from a cross-section of EU regions. Appl Econ 43:4663–4676
Ismihan M (2010) A New framework for output-unemployment relationship: Okun’s law revisited. MPRA Paper 28135, University Library of Munich, Germany
Islas-Camargo, A & Cortez, W (2018) Can the informal sector affect the relationship between unemployment and output? An analysis of the Mexican case. CEPAL Review 126:137–153.
Katos A, Pallis D, Kat Souli E (2004) System estimates of cyclical unemployment and cyclical output in the 15 European Union member-states. Int J Appl Econom Quant Stud 1(4):5–26
Knotek E (2007) How useful is Okun’s law? Econ Rev. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 4th quarter: 73–103
Lee J (2000) The robustness of Okun’s law: evidence from OECD countries. J Macroecon 22(2):331–356
Liu X, Lam R, Schipke A, Shen G (2018) A generalized Okun’s law: uncovering the myth of China’s labor market resilience. Rev Dev Econ 22(3):1195–1216
Liquitaya, J & Lizarazu, E (2003) Okun’s law in the mexican economy. Denarius, 8(1):15–39
Liquitaya, J (2005) Urban unemployment and the cycles of production in Mexico. Denarius 11:231–261
Loría E, Ramos M (2007) Okun’s law: a rereading for Mexico, 1970–2004. Econ Stud 22(001):19–55. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40311523
Marinkov M, Geldenhuys JP (2007) Cyclical unemployment and cyclical output: an estimation of Okun’s coefficient for South Africa. South African J Econ 75(3):373–390
Martín-Román ÁL (2022) Beyond the added-worker and the discouraged-worker effects: the entitled-worker effect. Econ Model 110:105812
Moosa IA (1997) A cross-country comparison of Okun’s coefficient. J Comp Econ 24:335–356
Okun A (1962) Potential GNP: its measurement and significance. Cowles Commission/Foundation Papers 190, 1963. https://cowles.yale.edu/publications/cfp/190. Accessed 24 Nov 2022
OIT (1993). Resolution concerning statistics of employment in the informal sector, adopted by the Fifteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_087484.pdf
Paldam M (1987) How much does one percent of growth change the unemployment rate? A study of 17 OECD countries. 1948–1985. Eur Econ Rev 31:306–313
Palley TI (1993) Okun’s law and the asymmetric and changing cyclical behavior of the US Economy. Int Rev Appl Econ 7:144–162
Pérez J, Rodríguez J, Usabiaga C (2003) Dynamic analysis of the relationship between the economic cycle and the unemployment cycle: a regional application. Reg Res 2:141–162
Perman R, Tavera C (2005) A cross-country analysis of the Okun’s law coefficient convergence in Europe. Appl Econ 37:2501–2513
Porras-Arena MS, Martín-Román ÁL (2019) Self-employment and the Okun’s law. Econ Model 77:253–265
Porras-Arena MS, Martín-Román ÁL (2021) The relationship between unemployment and economic growth in Latin America: estimates of Okun’s law by country. Int Lab Rev. Accepted Author Manuscript. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilrs.12191. Accessed 24 Nov 2022
Porras-Arena MS, Martín-Román ÁL (2022) The heterogeneity of Okun’s law: a metaregression analysis, GLO Discussion Paper, No. 1069. Global Labor Organization (GLO), Essen
Prachowny MFJ (1993) Okun’s law: theoretical foundations and revised estimates. Rev Econ Stat 75(2):331–336
Schnabel G (2002) Output trends and Okun’s law. Bank of International Settlements. BIS working papers 111
Sögner L, Stiassny A (2002) An analysis on the structural stability of Okun’s law – a cross-country study. Appl Econ 34(14):1775–1787
Virén M (2001) The Okun curve is nonlinear. Econ Lett 70:253–257
Villaverde, J & Maza, A (2007). Okun’s law in the Spanish regions. Economic Bulletin. 18:1–11
Villaverde, J & Maza, A (2009). The robustness of Okun’s law in Spain, 1980–2004. Regional evidence. J. Policy Model 31:289–297
Acknowledgments
Responsible Section Editor: Prof. Klaus F. Zimmermann. The chapter has benefitted from valuable comments of the editors.
There is no conflict of interest
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Porras-Arena, M.S., Martín-Román, Á.L. (2023). Okun’s Law: The Relationship Between Unemployment and Economic Growth. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_433-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_433-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences