Abstract
Antisocial behavior within the workplace can have adverse consequences on worker and firm productivity. Despite their potentially large costs, antisocial activities are rarely directly observable or recorded, making field studies on this topic relatively uncommon. This chapter presents the commonly used experimental methods to investigate workplace relevant antisocial behavior, the costs of such behavior, and possible explanations for its existence. Section “Sabotage” reviews the laboratory experimental methods that have been employed to measure sabotage; it also discusses the key results and possible explanations for this behavior. Section “Asset Destroying Actions” provides an overview of the asset destroying literature, where subjects are willing to pay to reduce others’ earnings. The final section “Dishonesty in the Workplace” focuses on the experimental literature on dishonesty, including corruption. This section also discusses potential motivations for dishonest behavior. The literature documents the existence of antisocial behavior. In particular, there is substantial evidence of sabotage, asset destroying actions, and dishonesty. The review identifies several motivations underlying these behaviors, such as envy, spite, reference dependence, inequality aversion, aversion to lying, maintenance of public and self-image, and social norms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbink K, Brandts J, Herrmann B, Orzen H (2010) Intergroup conflict and intra-group punishment in an experimental contest game. Am Econ Rev 100:420–447
Abbink K, Freidin E, Gangadharan L, Moro R (2018) The effect of social norms on bribe offers. J Law Econ Organ 34:457–474
Abbink K, Herrmann B (2011) The moral costs of nastiness. Econ Inq 49:631–633
Abbink K, Irlenbusch B, Renner E (2002) An experimental bribery game. J Law Econ Organ 18:428–454
Abeler J, Nosenzo D, Raymond C (2019) Preferences for truth-telling. Econometrica 87:1115–1153
Alatas V, Cameron L, Chaudhuri A, Erkal N, Gangadharan L (2009a) Gender, culture, and corruption: insights from an experimental analysis. South Econ J 75:663–680
Alatas V, Cameron L, Chaudhuri A, Erkal N, Gangadharan L (2009b) Subject pool effects in a corruption experiment: a comparison of Indonesian public servants and Indonesian students. Exp Econ 12:113–132
Armantier O, Boly A (2013) Comparing corruption in the laboratory and in the field in Burkina Faso and in Canada. Econ J 123:1168–1187
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2018) Report to the nations: 2018 global study on occupational fraud and abuse. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/acfepublic/2018-report-to-the-nations.pdf
Balafoutas L, Sutter M (2012) Affirmative action policies promote women and do not harm efficiency in the laboratory. Science 335:579–582
Banerjee A (1990) Envy. In: Dutton B, Dutta B, Gangopadhyay S, Mookherjee D, Ray D (eds) Economic theory and policy: essays in the honor of Dipak Banerjee. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 91–111
Banerjee R (2016) Corruption, norm violation and decay in social capital. J Public Econ 137:14–27
Banerjee R, Datta Gupta N, Villeval MC (2018) The spillover effects of affirmative action on competitiveness and unethical behavior. Eur Econ Rev 101:567–604
Banuri S, Eckel C (2012) Experiments in culture and corruption: a review. Res Exp Econ 15:51–76
Banuri S, Eckel C (2015) Cracking down on bribery. Soc Choice Welf 45:579–600
Barr A, Serra D (2010) Corruption and culture: an experimental analysis. J Public Econ 94:862–869
Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217
Belot M, Schröder M (2013) Sloppy work, lies and theft: a novel experimental design to study counterproductive behaviour. J Econ Behav Organ 93:233–238
Benistant J, Villeval MC (2019) Unethical behavior and group identity in contests. J Econ Psychol 72:128–155
Besancenot D, Dubart D, Vranceanu R (2013) The value of lies in an ultimatum game with imperfect information. J Econ Behav Organ 93:239–247
Bicchieri C, Dimant E, Gächter S, Nosenzo D (2019) Social proximity and the evolution of norm compliance. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3355028
Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am Econ Rev 90:166–193
Bosman R, Hennig-Schmidt H, van Winden F (2006) Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment. Exp Econ 9:35–51
Bosman R, Sutter M, van Winden F (2005) The impact of real effort and emotions in the power- to-take game. J Econ Psychol 26:407–429
Bosman R, van Winden F (2002) Emotional hazard in a power-to-take experiment. Econ J 112:146–169
Brennan G (1973) Pareto desirable redistribution: the case of malice and envy. J Public Econ 2:173–183
Cameron L, Chaudhuri A, Erkal N, Gangadharan L (2009) Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore. J Public Econ 93:843–851
Cappelen AW, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013) When do we lie? J Econ Behav Organ 93:258–265
Carpenter J, Matthews PH, Schirm J (2010) Tournaments and office politics: evidence from a real effort experiment. Am Econ Rev 100:504–517
Charness G, Gneezy U (2007) What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. J Econ Behav Organ 63:29–35
Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Q J Econ 117:817–869
Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2013) The dark side of competition for status. Manag Sci 60:38–55
Chen KP (2003) Sabotage in promotion tournaments. J Law Econ Org 19:119–140
Clark A, Oswald A (1996) Satisfaction and comparison income. J Public Econ 61:359–381
Cohn A, Maréchal MA (2018) Laboratory measure of cheating predicts school misconduct. Econ J 128:2743–2754
Cohn A, Fehr E, Maréchal MA (2014) Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature 516:86–89
Conrads J, Irlenbusch B, Rilke RM, Walkowitz G (2013) Lying and team incentives. J Econ Psychol 34:1–7
Dai Z, Galeotti F, Villeval MC (2018) Cheating in the lab predicts fraud in the field: an experiment in public transportation. Manag Sci 64:1081–1100
Drago F, Galbiati R (2012) Indirect effects of a policy altering criminal behaviour: evidence from the Italian prison experiment. Am Econ J Appl Econ 4:199–218
Dreber A, Johannesson M (2008) Gender differences in deception. Econ Lett 99:197–199
Dur R, Glazer A (2004) Optimal incentive contracts when workers envy their boss. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers
Erat S (2013) Avoiding lying: the case of delegated deception. J Econ Behav Organ 93:273–278
Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Manag Sci 58:1–11
Fallucchi F, Quercia S (2018) Affirmative action and retaliation in experimental contests. J Econ Behav Organ 156:23–40
Faravelli M, Friesen L, Gangadharan L (2015) Selection, tournaments, and dishonesty. J Econ Behav Organ 110:160–175
Fehr D (2018) Is increasing inequality harmful? Experimental evidence. Games Econ Behav 107:123–134
Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868
Feltovich N (2019) The interaction between competition and unethical behaviour. Exp Econ 22:101–130
Fischbacher U, Föllmi-Heusi F (2013) Lies in disguise – an experimental study on cheating. J Eur Econ Assoc 11:525–547
Fochmann M, Kocher M, Müller N, Wolf N (2019) Dishonesty and risk-taking: compliance decisions of individuals and groups. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3436157
Fosgaard T (2018) Defaults and dishonesty – evidence from a representative sample in the lab. J Econ Behav Organ 157:670–679
Friedrichs DO (2009) Trusted criminals: white collar crime in contemporary society, 4th edn. Wadsworth Centage Learning, Belmont, p 50
Friesen L, Gangadharan L (2012) Individual level evidence of dishonesty and the gender effect. Econ Lett 117:624–626
Friesen L, Gangadharan L (2013) Designing self-reporting regimes to encourage truth telling: an experimental study. J Econ Behav Organ 94:90–102
Galeotti F, Kline R, Orsini R (2017) When foul play seems fair: exploring the link between just deserts and honesty. J Econ Behav Organ 142:451–467
Gangadharan L, Grossman PJ, Molle MK, Vecci J (2019a) Impact of social identity and inequality on antisocial behaviour. Eur Econ Rev 119:199–215
Gangadharan L, Grossman PJ, Vecci J (2019b) Moving on up: the impact of income mobility on antisocial behaviour. Monash University Working Paper
Gibbons R (1998) Incentives in organizations. J Econ Perspect 12:115–132
Gibson R, Tanner C, Wagner AF (2013) Preferences for truthfulness: heterogeneity among and within individuals. Am Econ Rev 103:532–548
Gill D, Prowse V, Vlassopoulos M (2013) Cheating in the workplace: an experimental study of the impact of bonuses and productivity. J Econ Behav Organ 96:120–134
Gill D, Kissová Z, Lee J, Prowse V (2018) First-place loving and last-place loathing: how rank in the distribution of performance affects effort provision. Manag Sci 65:494–507
Gino F, Pierce L (2009a) Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psychol Sci 20:1153–1160
Gino F, Pierce L (2009b) The abundance effect: unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 109:142–155
Gneezy U (2005) Deception: the role of consequences. Am Econ Rev 95:384–394
Gürtler O, Münster J, Nieken P (2013) Information policy in tournaments with sabotage. Scand J Econ 115:932–966
Hanna R, Wang SY (2017) Dishonesty and selection into public service: evidence from India. Am Econ J 9:262–290
Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2008) How many winners are good to have? On tournaments with sabotage. J Econ Behav Organ 65:682–702
Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2011) Sabotage in tournaments: evidence from a laboratory experiment. Manag Sci 57:611–627
Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith VL (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Am Econ Rev 86:653–660
Houser D, Vetter S, Winter J (2012) Fairness and cheating. Eur Econ Rev 56:1645–1655
Hurkens S, Kartik N (2009) Would I lie to you? On social preferences and lying aversion. Exp Econ 12:180–192
Innes R, Mitra A (2013) Is dishonesty contagious? Econ Inq 51:722–734
Ip E, Leibbrandt A, Vecci J (2019) How do gender quotas affect workplace relationships? Complementary evidence from a representative survey and labor market experiments. Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3234
Jauernig J, Uhl M (2019) Spite and preemptive retaliation after tournaments. J Econ Behav Organ 158:328–336
Jauernig J, Uhl M, Luetge C (2016) Competition-induced punishment of winners and losers: Who is the target? J Econ Psychol 57:13–25
Johnson D, Salmon TC (2016) Sabotage versus discouragement: which dominates post promotion tournament behavior? South Econ J 82:673–696
Kajackaite A, Gneezy U (2017) Incentives and cheating. Games Econ Behav 102:433–444
Kingdon GG, Knight J (2007) Community, comparisons and subjective well-being in a divided society. J Econ Behav Organ 64:69–90
Knudsen T (2008) Reference group and variable risk strategies. J Econ Behav Organ 66:22–36
Kocher MG, Schudy S, Spantig L (2018) I lie? We lie! Why? Experimental evidence on a dishonesty shift in groups. Manag Sci 64:3995–3400
Kuziemko I, Buell RW, Reich T, Norton M (2014) Last-place aversion, evidence and redistributive implications. Q J Econ 129:105–149
Lazear EP (1989) Pay equality and industrial politics. J Polit Econ 97:561–580
Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank order tournaments as optimum labor contract. J Polit Econ 89:841–865
Leibbrandt A, Wang LC, Foo C (2017) Gender quotas, competitions, and peer review: experimental evidence on the backlash against women. Manag Sci 64:3501–3516
Lindholm C (2008) Culture and envy. In: Smith RH (ed) Envy: theory and research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 227–244
Lundquist T, Ellingsen T, Gribbe E, Johannesson M (2009) The aversion to lying. J Econ Behav Organ 70:81–92
Luttmer E (2005) Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Q J Econ 120:963–1002
Maggian V, Montinari N (2017) The spillover effects of gender quotas on dishonesty. Econ Lett 159:33–36
Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. J Mark Res 45:633–644
Mohnen A, Pokorny K (2006) Is honesty the best policy? An experimental study on the honesty of feedback in employer-employee relationships. Working paper, SSRN
Mui V (1995) The economics of envy. J Econ Behav Organ 26:311–336
Mujcic R, Frijters P (2012) Economic choices and status: measuring preferences for income rank. Oxf Econ Pap 65:47–73
Mulder LB, Aquino K (2013) The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 121:219–230
Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L (2013) How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Manag Sci 59:1–16
Prediger S, Vollan B, Herrmann B (2014) Resource scarcity and antisocial behavior. J Public Econ 119:1–9
Reuben E, Stephenson M (2013) Nobody likes a rat: on the willingness to report lies and the consequences thereof. J Econ Behav Organ 93:384–391
Rosaz J, Villeval MC (2012) Lies and biased evaluation: a real-effort experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 84:537–549
Sadrieh A, Schröder M (2017) Acts of helping and harming. Econ Lett 153:77–79
Salmon TC, Serra D (2017) Corruption, social judgment and culture: an experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 142:64–78
Salovey P, Rodin J (1984) Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. J Pers Soc Psychol 47:780–792
Schurr A, Ritov I (2016) Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior. PNAS 113:1754–1759
Schwieren C, Weichselbaumer D (2010) Does competition enhance performance or cheating? A laboratory experiment. J Econ Psychol 31:241–253
Shulman D (2005) Biting the hand that feeds: the employee theft epidemic. Infinity Publishing, West Conshohocken
Smith RH, Kim SH (2007) Comprehending envy. Psychol Bull 133:46–64
Sobel J (2005) Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J Econ Lit 43:392–436
Takahashi H, Kato M, Matsuura M, Mobbs D, Suhara T, Okubo Y (2009) When your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: neural correlates of envy and schadenfreude. Science 323(5916):937–939
Tesser A, Collins JE (1988) Emotion in social reflection and comparison situations: intuitive, systematic, and exploratory approaches. J Pers Soc Psychol 55:695–709
Watson R, Storey D, Wynarczyk P, Keasey K, Short H (1996) The relationship between job satisfaction and managerial remuneration in small and medium-sized enterprises: an empirical test of ‘comparison income’ and ‘equity theory’ hypotheses. Appl Econ 28:567–576
Zizzo DJ (2003) Money burning and rank egalitarianism with random dictators. Econ Lett 81:263–266
Zizzo DJ, Oswald AJ (2001) Are people willing to pay to reduce others’ incomes? Ann Econ Stat 63:39–65
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge research assistance provided by Evelina Onopriyenko as well as funding from the Australian Research Council (Discovery Project DP1411151). We also appreciate the excellent comments provided by the Editor, Maire Claire Villeval.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gangadharan, L., Grossman, P.J., Vecci, J. (2020). Antisocial Behavior in the Workplace. In: Zimmermann, K. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_139-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_139-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences