Abstract
Vegetables due to high nutritional value comprising of carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins and several other essential elements are considered one of the important dietary constituents. In order to achieve optimum yields, agrochemicals are frequently used in vegetable cultivation. However, the excessive and inappropriate use of agrochemicals has been found deleterious for both soil fertility and vegetable production. The negative impact of agrochemicals in vegetable production practices can be avoided by the use of biofertilizers involving nitrogen-fixing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. The use of non-pathogenic nitrogen-fixing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to enhance vegetable production is, therefore, currently considered as a safe, viable and inexpensive alternative to chemical fertilization. Even though there are no direct connections between nitrogen-fixing organisms and vegetables, both symbiotic and asymbiotic/associative nitrogen-fixing bacteria have been used to facilitate the growth and yield of non-legume crops like vegetables through mechanisms other than nitrogen fixation. Indeed, there are numerous reports on the effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on vegetable production, but the information on nitrogen-fixing bacteria employed in vegetable production is scarce. Considering these gaps and success of nitrogen-fixing bacteria application in vegetable production achieved so far, efforts have been directed to highlight the impact of nitrogen fixers on the production of vegetables. Here, efforts will be made to identify most suitable nitrogen fixers which could be used to improve the health and quality of vegetables grown in different regions. The use of nitrogen fixers is also likely to reduce the use of chemicals in vegetable production.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
3.1 Introduction
Nitrogen-fixing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria including both symbiotic and asymbiotic/associative bacteria have been used in agricultural practices to promote growth and yield of many crops (Ahmad et al. 2013) including vegetables (Antoun et al. 1998; Lamo 2009; Vikhe 2014; Ziaf et al. 2016). Of these, bacteria that form root nodules on leguminous plants and transform atmospheric nitrogen (N) into usable form of N are collectively known as rhizobia: a general term used to denote all rhizobial genera together (Lindstrom and Martinez-Romero 2005). Beijerinck (1888) first of all isolated a bacterium from root nodules, which he identified as Bacillus radicicola. In the late nineteenth century, Frank (1889) named this bacterium Rhizobium leguminosarum and identified other species belonging to the same group. The term ‘rhizobia’ was originally used to name bacteria belonging to the genus Rhizobium, but nowadays, rhizobia also include other genera, for example, Bradyrhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Azorhizobium, Mesorhizobium, etc. (Sahgal and Johri 2003; Graham 2008). The designation rhizobia currently includes more than 70 species distributed over 13 genera including some Betaproteobacteria such as Burkholderia and Cupriavidus (Chen et al. 2007; Barrett and Parker 2006). Other nitrogen-fixing bacteria are free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria such as Azotobacter and Azospirillum. They also have the ability to fix nitrogen and to release certain phytohormones, i.e. GA3, IAA and cytokinins (Vikhe 2014) which could stimulate plant growth and increase the availability of nutrients for plant roots. Traditionally, nitrogen fixers have largely been used to supply nitrogen to plants. However, more recently, some nitrogen fixers including both symbiotic (e.g. rhizobia) and asymbiotic (e.g. Azotobacter) have also attracted the attention of vegetable growers due to their positive effects on nonlegumes (Antoun et al. 1998; Bhadoria et al. 2005; Lamo 2009; Ramakrishnan and Selvakumar 2012). Vegetable growers on the contrary have long been using agrochemicals (Guertal 2009) in order to obtain maximum yields. The extensive use of fertilizers in vegetable production is, however, at present under debate due to environmental distress and problems to consumer health. Consequently, there has recently been a growing level of interest in environmentally friendly sustainable vegetable practices. In this regard, the integrated use of biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers is considered as the best choice not only to reduce the intensive consumption of chemical fertilizers but also to sustain soil with minimum undesirable impacts and to maximize fertilizer use efficiency in soil (Singh et al. 1999; Palm et al. 2001). Accordingly, soil microorganisms especially PGPR become important in horticultural practices because they are inexpensive and do not cause soil pollution. Among nitrogen-fixing PGPR, rhizobia are reported to possess many desirable plant growth-promoting traits (Ghosh et al. 2015) apart from their normal nitrogen fixation ability. When applied properly, they have been found to exert diverse positive effects on many important nonlegume crops (García-Fraile et al. 2012) including vegetables (Islam et al. 2013; Silva et al. 2014). Mechanistically, nitrogen-fixing PGPR can improve the growth and development of vegetables by producing compounds such as the phytohormone indole acetic acid (Sahasrabudhe 2011) or the enzyme ACC deaminase (Bhattacharjee et al. 2012) involved in the metabolism of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), a precursor of ethylene. They can also mobilize certain major nutrients to the plants such as phosphorous via solubilization of soil insoluble phosphates (Singh et al. 2014a). Nitrogen-fixing PGPR expressing one or multiple plant growth-promoting activities can directly or indirectly promote vegetable growth. Also, some nitrogen-fixing PGPR secrete antimicrobial compounds like siderophores (Singh et al. 2014a), a low-molecular iron-chelating molecules, which restrict the growth of phytopathogens in soils with low content of this ion promoting indirectly the plant growth (Bhattacharjee et al. 2008; Lugtenberg and Kamilova 2009). Considering the importance of nitrogen-fixing PGPR in vegetable production, efforts are made here to collect information on the impact of nitrogen-fixing PGPR on different vegetables grown in different ecological niches.
3.2 Rationale for Using Nitrogen Fixers in Vegetable Production
Vegetables are one of the most important food commodities that significantly affect human health. Due to constantly increasing health awareness among masses, there is greater demand of quality vegetables on regular basis. In order to fulfil the growing demands of vegetarians, vegetable growers have increased the use of synthetic fertilizers to achieve optimum vegetable yields (Abayomi and Adebayo 2014; Guo et al. 2011). The intensive use of chemical fertilizers, however, is reported to cause soil/underground water pollution, destructs microbial composition and their functions, reduces soil fertility and human health (via food chain) problems, makes plant more susceptible to the attack of diseases (Abdelaziz et al. 2007) and leads to ecological risks and poor quality and lesser vegetable yields (Olowoake and Adeoye 2010). Furthermore, higher rates of fertilizer application in vegetable cultivation result in reduced ascorbic acid (vitamin C) content, accumulation of higher level of nitrates especially in leafy vegetables, altered flavour, delayed maturity and increased weight loss. Considering the deleterious effects of fertilizers, and challenge to produce fresh and healthy vegetables, there is urgent need to find suitable alternatives that could help to implement need-based nutrient management (NBNM) practices in order to achieve optimum quality vegetables without any dangerous impact of such chemicals on vegetables. In this context, the use of microbial preparations often called biofertilizers (Dixit et al. 2007) has been found safe for supplying the nutrients to crops besides limiting the problems associated with the use of conventional chemical fertilizers. Biofertilizer is essentially a natural product carrying living microorganisms recovered from various sources including rhizospheres or cultivated soils. Indeed, biofertilizers prepared from nitrogen-fixing PGPR don’t have any ill effect on soil fertility and environment instead they improve the soil quality. A small dose of biofertilizer is sufficient to produce desirable results because each gram of carrier of biofertilizers contains at least 10 million viable cells of a specific strain (Anandaraj and Delapierre 2010). Taking into consideration the success of PGPR achieved so far with other crops (Ahmad et al. 2013; Zaidi et al. 2015), different workers have applied nitrogen-fixing PGPR including rhizobia (García-Fraile et al. 2012), Azotobacter (Bhadoria et al. 2005) and Azospirillum (Ramakrishnan and Selvakumar 2012) along with (Bhadoria et al. 2005) or without (Sharafzadeh 2012) fertilizers for enhancing the production of different vegetables. Apart from their main role in nitrogen fixation, they also stimulate plant growth by other mechanisms such as providing hormones, better nutrient uptake and increased tolerance towards drought and moisture stress. Other major problem in vegetable production is the occurrence of diseases caused by many phytopathogens such as Pythium aphanidermatum causing damping-off disease of cucumber (Elazzazy et al. 2012), Ralstonia solanacearum causing wilt of brinjal (Chakravarty and Kalita 2012), Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici causing tomato wilt (Loganathan et al. 2014), etc. Traditionally, such diseases are controlled by agrochemicals (pesticides), using sanitary/cultural practices and developing resistant varieties (Sharma and Saikia 2013; Sahar et al. 2013). These disease control measures have, however, neither been promising nor successful. Therefore, the secretion of physiologically active biomolecules such as siderophores (Panhwar et al. 2014), antibiotics (Keel et al. 1992), cyanogenic compounds (Ruangsanka 2014) and lytic enzymes (Nabti et al. 2014) by some nitrogen-fixing PGPR such as rhizobia (Datta and Chakrabartty 2014), Azotobacter (Shimaa et al. 2015) or Azospirillum (Tortora et al. 2011) has been considered a viable, inexpensive and most effective option for controlling such lethal diseases. More importantly, the use of nitrogen fixers has been found safe for human health after several decades of crop inoculation ensuring that they are optimal bacteria for biofertilization.
3.3 Nitrogen Fixers-Vegetable Interactions: How Nitrogen Fixers Enter Vegetables
Nitrogen fixers in general have widely been used as biofertilizer to supply nitrogen to legumes or other associated crops. Among nitrogen fixers, the members of family Rhizobiaceae have also been found to form non-specific associative interactions with roots of other plants without forming nodules (Reyes and Schimidt 1979). Associative symbiosis refers to a wide variety of nitrogen-fixing species that colonize the root surface of nonleguminous plants without formation of differentiated structures (Elmerich and Newton 2007). In other words, these nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria possess the ability to promote the growth of nonlegumes by acting as PGPR (Noel et al. 1996). Indeed, rhizobia can attach to the surface of monocots in the same manner as they attach to dicot hosts (Shimshick and Hebert 1979; Terouchi and Syono 1990). Also, rhizobia grow readily in the presence of germinating seeds and developing root systems in a similar manner with legumes and nonlegumes (Pena-Cabriales and Alexander 1983). It is also interesting to note that the endophytic interaction of rhizobia and nonlegumes occurs without the involvement of genetic signals as observed between rhizobia and legumes during nodulation process (Reddy et al. 1997). Generally, the nitrogen fixers, for instance, rhizobia, enter inside nonlegume plant tissues mainly through cracks in epidermal cells of the roots and in fissure sites where lateral roots have emerged (Dazzo and Yanni 2006; Prayitno et al. 1999). Summarily, the rhizobial endophytic establishment being a dynamic process begins with root colonization which is followed by crack entry into the root interior through separated epidermal cells. Thereafter, endophytes consistently travel up to the stem base, leaf sheath and leaves where they grow rapidly to high population densities (Chi et al. 2005). After they enter inside the plant tissues and attain high population densities, they may influence plant growth by different PGPR mechanisms. Both rhizobia and Azotobacter species, apart from supplying N to their respective host plants, secrete some compounds like auxins, cytokinins and antibiotics which directly or indirectly promote the growth of nonlegume plants. For example, Sarhan (2008) indicated a positive effect of Azotobacter on growth and yield of potato plants.
3.4 Mechanism of Vegetable Growth Promotion by Nitrogen-Fixing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Nitrogen fixers like many conventional free-living PGPR can affect plant growth via direct or indirect mechanisms. The direct mechanisms by which nitrogen fixers promote the growth of nonlegumes including vegetable include the solubilization of insoluble P by rhizobia (Singh et al. 2014a; Abd-Alla 1994; Halder and Chakrabarty 1991) and species of Azotobacter (Nosrati et al. 2014). Symbiotic rhizobia are advantageous than free-living PGPR in P solubilization as these bacteria are well protected inside the nodule tissues and face little/no competition from indigenous soil microbiota. Another important growth regulator that directly promotes the growth of vegetables is indole acetic acid secreted both by rhizobia (Kumar and Ram 2012; Sahasrabudhe 2011) and Azotobacter (Kumar et al. 2014). Indole acetic acid has been reported to play a central role in plant growth and development and acts as a signal molecule which is involved in plant signal processing, motility or attachment of bacteria in root which help in legume-Rhizobium symbiosis (Spaepen et al. 2009). On the contrary, the indirect mechanisms of plant growth promotion by rhizobia/Azotobacter involve the secretion of compounds that lessen or prevent the deleterious effects of one or more phytopathogenic organisms (Gandhi Pragash et al. 2009). Productions of siderophores (Greek for iron carrier), a low-molecular (500–1000 daltons) iron-chelating substance by Azotobacter (Muthuselvan and Balagurunathan 2013) or rhizobia (Ahmad et al. 2013; Datta and Chakrabartty 2014), may be considered a direct factor, since siderophores solubilize and sequester iron from soil and provide it to plant cells. But it can also be considered an indirect factor, since it is associated with suppression of plant pathogens by depriving them of iron uptake. Moreover, siderophore-producing ability helps in the sustenance of rhizobia in iron-deficient soils (Lesueur et al. 1995). The growth-promoting substances involved in vegetable production synthesized by various rhizobia/Azotobacter are summarized in Table 3.1.
3.5 Nitrogen-Fixing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Improve Vegetable Production: A General Perspective
Conventional growers in order to achieve high yield and quality vegetables apply higher rates of chemical fertilizers, which are expensive and destructive to environment (Orhan et al. 2006). Considering the threat of the excessive use of fertilizers to soil fertility and vegetable production, vegetable growers have shown interest in applying environmentally friendly and sustainable nitrogen-fixing PGPR (Dixit et al. 2007; Shukla et al. 2012; Ziaf et al. 2016). Generally, the application of nitrogen-fixing PGPR in vegetable production has been found as an attractive alternative to replace chemical fertilizer, pesticides and other supplements. Nitrogen fixers including both symbiotic rhizobia and asymbiotic/associative nitrogen fixers, for example, Azotobacter or Azospirillum, have traditionally been used as biofertilizer to supply N to legumes and cereals/other crops. Among non-symbiotic N-fixing bacteria, Azotobacter and Azospirillum have widely been used for enhancing the production of vegetables (Doifode and Nandkar 2014; Solanki et al. 2010). The beneficial effects of Azotobacter and Azospirillum are attributed mainly to an improvement in root development, an increase in the rate of water and mineral uptake by roots, displacement of fungi and plant pathogenic bacteria and, to a lesser extent, biological nitrogen fixation (Okon and Itzisohn 1995). Besides N2 fixation, Azotobacter synthesizes and secretes considerable amounts of biologically active substances like B vitamins, nicotinic acid, pantothenic acid, biotin, heteroxins, gibberellins, etc. which enhance root growth of plants (Rao 1986). Another important characteristic of Azotobacter association with crop improvement is secretion of ammonia in the rhizosphere in the presence of root exudates, which helps in modification of nutrient uptake by the plants (Narula and Gupta 1986). The ability of Azospirillum to produce plant growth regulatory substances along (Tahir et al. 2013) with N2 fixation stimulates plant growth and thereby productivity. Considering these, nitrogen-fixing PGPR for nonlegumes especially vegetable production (Table 3.2) have attracted greater attention in recent times. Nitrogen-fixing PGPR have been found to colonize and survive in the rhizosphere of the nonlegumes plant to act as PGPR in the rhizosphere of non-host legumes and nonlegumes (Wiehe and Höflich 1995). Nitrogen-fixing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria when used alone or in combination with other free-living PGPR have also caused a dramatic increase in vegetable production (Noel et al. 1996; Antoun et al. 1998). Mechanistically, as inoculant, nitrogen-fixing PGPR facilitate the vegetable growth by mechanisms other than nitrogen fixation (Trabelsi et al. 2012). When used as mixture, the composite nitrogen fixers provide multiple benefits to crops in addition to their normal physiological activity of N fixation (Iqbal et al. 2012). And hence, the synergistic effects of nitrogen fixer and other free-living PGPR/AM fungi have been found more effective than single inoculation and massively increase vegetable production largely due to enhanced synthesis of phytohormones and nutrient absorption and mobilization (Reimann et al. 2008; Yu et al. 2012). As an example, the composite application of rhizobia (Bradyrhizobium japonicum), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and mineral fertilizers (urea and potash) has been reported to suppress the deleterious impact of root-rotting fungi and root-knot nematode leading consequently to enhanced tomato production (Parveen et al. 2008). Conclusively, due to their variable growth-promoting activities, nitrogen fixers can be used either alone or in combination with other free-living PGPR/AM fungi for enhancing the production of vegetable in different vegetable production systems.
3.6 Effects of Nitrogen-Fixing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Important Vegetable Crops
Vegetables are one of the most important food commodities which have occupied a central place in human dietary systems. Production of fresh and quality vegetables is, therefore, required in order to fulfil the demands of vegetarian around the world. Therefore, considering the importance of nitrogen-fixing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in vegetable growth, an attempt is made in the following section to highlight the impact of nitrogen-fixing PGPR on some vegetables grown in different production systems.
3.6.1 Potato (Solanum tuberosum)
Potato is a starchy and tuberous crop of the Solanaceae family. Potato, ranking fourth in production among vegetables, is a high-yielding, nutrient-exhaustive and short-duration crop. Potato requires higher quantities of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers for optimum production (Igual et al. 2001). Therefore, to reduce fertilizer application, nitrogen-fixing PGPR have been employed as a biofertilizer or as bacterial inoculum in potato production (Sidorenko et al. 1996; Kumar et al. 2001; Shafeek et al. 2004). For example, in order to investigate the effects of natural and chemical fertilizers on yield and quality of potato, Mohammadi et al. (2013) conducted a study at the Agricultural Research Farm of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. The experiment included three factors: (1) nitragin biofertilizer (a combination of Azotobacter species and Azospirillum species), (2) HB-101 (a completely organic natural extract) and (3) chemical urea fertilizer (500 kg/ha). Generally, all factors showed significant effects on tuber yield, tuber weight, number of tuber per plant, biological yield, harvest index and tuber nitrate content of potato. However, the highest tuber yield and the number of tuber per plant were obtained when tubers were inoculated jointly with nitragin, urea and HB-101. On the contrary, the lowest tuber nitrate content was obtained when HB-101 was sprayed two times and the tubers were inoculated with nitragin biofertilizer. From this study, it was concluded that the composite application of natural and biological fertilizers along with urea can be useful to enhance potato yield and quality. In a similar study, Verma et al. (2011) conducted an experiment on potato variety Kufri Jawahar to assess the effect of organic components on growth, yield and economic return in potato. The results revealed that combination of crop residues + Azotobacter + phosphobacteria + biodynamic approach was the best among all the treatments for most of the growth and yield parameters and gave highest net return and B:C (benefit/cost) ratio. Thus, it can be concluded that the biofertilizers (Azotobacter, phosphobacteria, microbial culture and biodynamic approach) are an advantageous source for sustainable organic agriculture, especially for heavy feeder crops like potato. Zahir et al. (1997) also conducted a pot experiment to evaluate the effects of an auxin precursor L-tryptophan (L-TRP) and Azotobacter inoculation on yield and chemical composition of potato grown with varying rates of fertilizers. Inoculated (with Azotobacter) and uninoculated potato tubers were sown in fertilized (with NPK 250:150:150 kg/ha, respectively) pots, and 1-week-old seedlings were treated with different concentrations of L-TRP (10−4–10−7 g/kg soil). Results revealed that L-TRP application alone had no significant effect on tuber and straw yield and PK uptake; however, N uptake and NPK concentrations in the potato tubers were significantly increased at some of the L-TRP levels. Azotobacter inoculation significantly increased tuber yield by 28.5%, N uptake and NPK concentrations relative to control. Also, Azotobacter inoculation in the presence of L-TRP was found more effective and considerably increased the tuber and straw yield by 62.9 and 47.8%, respectively, and NPK uptake compared to sole application of Azotobacter. Hussain et al. (1993) conducted a field experiment to assess the ability of Azotobacter inoculation for enhancing yield and other growth parameters on a sandy loam soil treated with NPK (250:125:125 kg/ha, respectively). Shoot, root, single tuber weight, tuber yield plant and R/S ratio increased significantly following inoculation with all Azotobacter strains, and maximum tuber yield (18.13% higher than control) was observed with Azotobacter strain. The increase in potato growth was possibly due to the production of plant growth regulators since there was no possibility of N2 fixation in the presence of such a high dose of N. Similar increase in growth and yield and other components of potato due to inoculation with biofertilizer (Azotobacter chroococcum with Azospirillum brasilense) is reported (Osman 2007). Mirshekari and Alipour (2013) evaluated the bio-priming effect of three different types of biofertilizers: Azotobacter, super nitro plus and super nitro on three potato cultivars—Agria, Satina and Kuzima—grown under field conditions. The number of tubers per plant in potato inoculated with Azotobacter and super nitro was 8.2, while non-inoculated seeds produced seven tubers per plant. However, seed inoculation with biofertilizers reduced the tubers size considerably over control. Among all treatments, seeds inoculated with Azotobacter had higher tuber yield (18,840 kg/ha), while the lowest was recorded for control (15,380 kg/ha). The stepwise regression analysis further verified that the tubers with diameter of greater than 40 mm and mean of tuber weight per plant had a marked increasing effect on the seed yield of potato. The present findings suggested that the tested biofertilizers could be used by farmers before sowing for enhancing potato production. In a follow-up study, Naqqash et al. (2016) inoculated potato with five bacteria belonging to genera Rhizobium, Azospirillum, Agrobacterium, Pseudomonas and Enterobacter under axenic conditions and observed differential growth responses of potato. Of these, associative nitrogen fixer Azospirillum sp. TN10 showed the highest increase in fresh and dry weight of potato over control plants. Also, the N contents of shoot and roots were found maximum following Azospirillum sp. TN10 application. Additionally, bacterial strains did colonize and maintained their population densities in the potato rhizosphere for up to 60 days, with Azospirillum sp. and Rhizobium sp. showing the highest survival. Since all strains showed variable impact, it was suggested that Azospirillum and Rhizobium could be used to develop biofertilizer for the production of potato.
Apart from directly affecting the growth and yield of potato, nitrogen-fixing PGPR have also been used to facilitate the growth of potato indirectly by secreting siderophores (Muthuselvan and Balagurunathan 2013), HCN (Prasad et al. 2014) or antifungal metabolites (Bhosale et al. 2013). As an example, Meshram (1984) reported that isolates of Azotobacter chroococcum were found to be promising for the control of infestation of potato plants with Rhizoctonia solani. Inoculation with an isolate of Verticillium biguttatum in combination with isolates of A. chroococcum effectively protected sprouts, stems and stolons against infestation with R. solani. The effect of inoculation, however, varied with soil temperature. No sclerotia were formed on potatoes harvested from soil in pots inoculated with isolates of A. chroococcum plus V. biguttatum under glasshouse conditions, and the yield increased significantly over the control.
3.6.2 Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)
Tomato, the second-most important vegetable crops (Dorais et al. 2008), is cultivated throughout the world occupying an area of 3.5 × 106 ha with the production of 1 × 106 tons (FAO 2010). In India, it occupies an area of 0.54 million ha with a production of 7.60 million ton with an average yield of 14.074 tons per ha (Anonymous 2006). Tomato is a tasty and nutritious vegetable containing vitamins A and C and lycopene content. Due to these nutritive properties, the efforts to produce safe and quality tomatoes both in developing and developed countries have increased (Mahajan and Singh 2006; Flores et al. 2010). In order to reduce the cost and to avoid toxic impact of synthetic fertilizers on tomato production, Ramakrishnan and Selvakumar (2012) applied different biofertilizers to assess their effect on growth and yield of tomato plants. For this, 20-day-old seedlings were transplanted into field until the fruit ripening period. After transplanting, tomato seedlings were bacterized with Azotobacter, Azospirillum and mixture of both Azotobacter and Azospirillum. Microbial inoculations, in general, significantly enhanced the whole plant dry weight, plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of fruits per plant, yield per plant, average fruit weight per plant, chlorophyll and protein content. Among all treatments, the composite application of Azotobacter and Azospirillum showed maximum yield relative to single inoculations and control. The overall results suggest that biofertilizer inoculation improves plant mineral concentration through nitrogen fixation and thereby alters fruit production in tomato plants.
In a similar study, Islam et al. (2013) used 13 nitrogen-fixing bacterial strains belonging to 11 different genera which were positive for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (ACCD), IAA, salicylic acid and ammonia production. The strains RFNB3 of Pseudomonas sp. and RFNB14 of Serratia sp. most effectively solubilized both tricalcium phosphate and zinc oxide. In addition, all strains except Pseudomonas sp. RFNB3 oxidized sulphur, and six strains were positive for siderophore synthesis, and each strain expressed at least four PGP properties in addition to N2 fixation. Of these, nine strains were selected based on their multiple PGP potential and evaluated for their effects on early growth of tomato and red pepper under gnotobiotic conditions. Bacterial inoculation considerably influenced root and shoot length, seedling vigour and dry biomass of the two crop plants. Three strains demonstrating substantial performance were further selected for greenhouse trials with red pepper. Of the selected strains, Pseudomonas sp. RFNB3 resulted in significantly higher plant height (26%) and dry biomass (28%) compared to control. The highest rate of N2 fixation as determined by acetylene reduction assay (ARA) occurred in Novosphingobium sp. RFNB21-inoculated red pepper root (49.6 nM of ethylene/h/g of dry root) and rhizosphere soil (41.3 nM of ethylene/h/g of dry soil). Moreover, the inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria significantly increased chlorophyll content and the uptake of different macro- and micronutrient contents leading to enhanced red pepper shoots compared to uninoculated controls. The findings of this study suggest that certain nitrogen-fixing strains possessing multiple PGP traits could be used as biofertilizers for enhancing the production of vegetables. Likewise, Bhadoria et al. (2005) conducted a field trial to assess the effect of three Azotobacter inoculation (without inoculation, soil inoculation and seedling inoculation) and five levels of N (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 kg/ha) on tomato and red pepper. A basal dose of P (80 kg/ha) and K (80 kg/ha) along with 50% N was applied at the time of field preparation. Remaining dose of N was top-dressed after 30 days of transplanting. Azotobacter culture was used as soil inoculant (5 kg/ha) and seedling inoculant (2 kg/ha), and fresh and dry weight of fruit, ascorbic acid content, total soluble solids (TSS) and cracking percentage of fruits were recorded. Maximum fresh and dry weight, ascorbic acid, TSS (%) and minimum percentage of fruit cracking were observed under the seedling treatment with Azotobacter culture over soil inoculation and without inoculation. Favourable environments like proper aeration around roots and considerably greater food materials near roots might be the possible reasons for better bacterial activity resulting in more N2 fixation and higher growth attributes with the seedling inoculation as compared to soil inoculation of Azotobacter culture (Martinez et al. 1993). Increase in quality characters might also be due to growth-promoting substances released by bacterial strains which could have accelerated the synthesis of carbohydrates, vitamins and other characters (Balakrishnan 1988). However, with increase in N concentration, there was a corresponding increase in fresh and dry weight, TSS and cracking percentage of fruit. The maximum fresh weight of fruit and ascorbic acid content were recorded with the application of 75 kg N/ha + seedling inoculated with Azotobacter culture, while maximum TSS and dry matter of fruit were observed for 100 kg N/ha + seedling inoculated with Azotobacter, which was at par with 75 kg N/ha + seedling inoculated with Azotobacter. Also, fruit cracking (%) was increased significantly with increasing dose of N. Similar results have also been reported by Singh and Singh (1992), Chattoo et al. (1997) and Fageria et al. (1992). Apart from asymbiotic/associative nitrogen-fixing PGPR, the symbiotic rhizobia have also been reported to influence tomato production (Ibiene et al. 2012). For instance, García-Fraile et al. (2012) in seed inoculation assays demonstrated that strains TPV08 and PETP01 of R. leguminosarum promoted the growth of both tomato and pepper. The dry biomass of shoots and roots of inoculated seedlings was two times higher than uninoculated seedlings. Also, there was a significant increase in the number of flowers and fruits of inoculated plants measured at harvest relative to control plants. The N, P, K and Mg concentrations significantly differed in inoculated and uninoculated plants. This finding consolidated the facts that rhizobia could also be developed as an efficient biofertilizer for augmenting the growth, yield and quality of tomato and pepper in different horticultural practices.
In addition to synthetic fertilizers, plant pathogens also affect very badly the production of vegetables (Singh et al. 2014b). Root diseases caused by root-rotting fungi and root-knot nematodes, for example, are a serious problem in tomato production throughout the world. To overcome disease problems, pesticides are applied on regular basis, but due to numerous problems like cost, emergence of resistance among insect pests and soil pollution associated with the use of pesticides, alternative strategies for disease management including the use of nitrogen-fixing PGPR are required. In this regard, Parveen et al. (2008) employed various treatments containing Bradyrhizobium japonicum, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PGPR) and mineral fertilizers (urea and potash) in the management of root-rotting fungi and root-knot nematodes. P. aeruginosa and B. japonicum when used alone or with mineral fertilizers significantly reduced infection of tomato roots by the root-rotting fungi Macrophomina phaseolina, Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium solani. Furthermore, the composite culture of P. aeruginosa and rhizobia in the presence of urea only or both urea and potash together resulted in greater suppression of M. phaseolina than sole application of each organism. Single application of P. aeruginosa or B. japonicum or with mineral fertilizers also suppressed the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by reducing numbers of galls on roots, nematode establishment in roots and nematode populations in soil. The maximum shoot fresh weight was recorded when treatment of P. aeruginosa or B. japonicum was applied with urea and potash or with urea alone. This study thus revealed that rhizobia could also be used in the management of certain diseases affecting vegetables in a big way.
3.6.3 Eggplant (Solanum melongena)
Eggplant also known as garden egg, aubergine, brinjal or Guinea squash is one of the non-tuberous species of the nightshade family Solanaceae (Kantharajah and Golegaonkar 2004). Eggplant is one of the top ten vegetables grown in the world. Even though it is of considerable economic importance in Asia, Africa and the subtropics (India, Central America), it is also grown in some warm temperate regions of the Mediterranean and South America (Sihachkr et al. 1993). Globally, Asia accounts for 92.4% of the total world production. Nutritive value of eggplant is comparable to any other common vegetables but is less than tomato. Eggplant fruits are low in calories, but the mineral composition of eggplants is important for human health. Eggplant is composed of 92.7% moisture, 1.4% protein, 1.3% fibre, 0.3% fat and 0.3% minerals, and the remaining 4% consists of various carbohydrates and vitamins (A and C). They are also a rich source of potassium, magnesium, calcium and iron (Zenia and Halina 2008). Apart from these, it also contains beta-carotene (34 mg), riboflavin (0.05 mg), thiamine (0.05 mg), niacin (0.5 mg) and ascorbic acid (0.9 mg) per 100 g of fruit (Choudhary 1976). Among plant nutrients, nitrogen is required by eggplants in comparatively larger amounts than other elements (Marschner 1995), and deficiency of it generally results in stunted growth and chlorotic leaves that lead to premature flowering and shortening of the growth cycle. As an example, Bobadi and Van Damme (2003) investigated the effect of varying level of N (50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175 and 200 kg N/ha) on number of flowers per plant, number of different types of flowers per plant, length of style, number of fruits per plant and fruit yield/ha of eggplant under controlled greenhouse conditions. Of the varying N concentrations, 200 kg N/ha showed the best performance and significantly produced the highest number of flowers per plant, fruits per plant and yield (32.24 ton/ha) over control plants. However, there was no visible effect of N on style length and type of flowers (long, medium, pseudo-short and short-styled flowers). Also, the results on the measured parameters were comparable when N was applied at 150 and 175 kg/ha. In order to reduce dependency on chemical N fertilizers, Nanthakumar and Veeragavathatham (2000) assessed the effect of integrated nutrient management on the growth and yield of aubergine (cv. Palur 1) during kharif, rabi and summer seasons in Tamil Nadu, India. The results clearly indicated that combining organic fertilizers such as farmyard manure (12.5 t/ha) and 2 kg each of Azospirillum and phosphobacteria, with inorganic fertilizers at 75% of the recommended dose of N and P and 100% of K (75 kgN, 37.5 kg P and 22.5 kg K/ha), favourably affected the growth parameters leading to a maximum increase in yield (36.48 t/ha) of eggplant. Bhakare et al. (2008) conducted an experiment in Rahuri, Maharashtra, India, during kharif with aubergine cv. Mahyco-10, involving different N levels, nitrogen-fixing PGPR, Azotobacter chroococcum biofertilizer and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. The application of Azotobacter biofertilizer caused a significant increase in plant height, branch number, fruit number per plant and yield/ha compared to the uninoculated control. The inoculation effect was maximum in the treatment containing 100% recommended dose of NPK (NPK 100:50:50 kg/ha) + A. chroococcum biofertilizer. Subsequently, the A. chroococcum inoculation resulted in consistent increase in yield attributes with gradual increase in the level of N. The yield obtained with 75% RDN+ A. chroococcum was almost equal to control. From this study, it was obvious that 25 kg N/ha could be saved if supplemented with A. chroococcum inoculation. Similarly, the application of Azospirillum and Azotobacter along with recommended dose of fertilizer resulted in maximum plant height, number of branches per plant, number of fruits per plant, fruit yield per plant and per ha and TSS in brinjal plants. Whereas days to initiation of flowering, fruit weight and crude protein did not change significantly (Solanki et al. 2010).
In a recent study, Latha et al. (2014) observed that the sole/composite application of microbial and chemical fertilizers had a great effect on the measured stages of eggplant growth. However, the total biomass differed significantly among treatments. Among all treatments, the maximum biomass was observed for treatment containing urea, super phosphate, muriate of potash, Azospirillum, phosphobacteria and potassium mobilizer (each 5 g/pot), and the fresh weight was 89.67 g/plant and dry weight 6.15 g/plant at harvest. Maximum chlorophyll content (1.7490 mg/g), protein content (18.2 mg/g), phenol content (19.6 mg/g) and carbohydrates (92 mg/g) in inoculated eggplant were recorded at flowering stage. In a follow-up study, Doifode and Nandkar (2014) evaluated the effect of biofertilizer like Azotobacter and Bacillus polymyxa (PSB) used alone and in different combinations with recommended dose of chemical fertilizer (NPK) on brinjal crop during kharif season to explore the possibility of reducing doses of chemical fertilizers and for better soil health. The growth characters such as height of plant (11.03–37.54%), stem diameter (6.38–23.79%), length of root (5.56–36.93%), number of functional leaves (5.67–51.51%), weight of fresh shoot (7.90–35.91%) and weight of dry shoot (7.14–46.94%) were significantly improved following microbial inoculations over control. Similarly, number of fruits per plant (11.3–52.81%) and yield of fruits (11.89–54.61%) were more in inoculated crop, and the attack of shoot-root borer, fruit borer and little leaf infestation was less (26.71–50.14%) as compared to uninoculated condition.
3.6.4 Cabbage (Brassica oleracea)
Cabbage is yet another important vegetable that requires proper nutrients for optimum production. And hence, nutrient management involving the use of chemical fertilizers coupled with inexpensive biofertilizers and environmentally safe organic manures in balanced proportion may be effective in augmenting the cabbage production (Hussein and Joo 2011). Considering this strategy, Sharma (2002) in a field trial assessed the impact of nitrogen-fixing PGPR (Azospirillum and Azotobacter) and different levels of N (0.30, 45 and 60 kg N/ha) on growth and yield of cabbage. Azospirillum application significantly increased the number and weight of non-wrapper leaves/plant, head length and width, gross and net weight of head/plant and yield/ha. Similarly, N at 60 kg/ha produced maximum number and weight of non-wrapper leaves/plant, head length and width, gross and net weight of head/plant and yield/ha. In addition, Azospirillum in the presence of 60 kg N/ha resulted in maximum yield/ha with benefit:cost ratio of 2.9. Similarly, Sarkar et al. (2010) assessed the influence of varying dose of N (0, 60, 80 and 100 kg/ha) and biofertilizer (Azotobacter) on growth and yield of cabbage grown at Horticulture Research Station, Mondouri of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, using a plot size of 4.2 × 3.6 m. Application of both N and biofertilizer in general displayed a significant impact on growth and yield attributes of cabbage. In terms of plant improvement, 100 kg N/ha was found to be superior which was followed by 80 kg N/ha. Azotobacter-inoculated cabbage plants performed better than non-inoculated plants, and statistical differences were noted in this respect except the number of outer leaves. Plants inoculated with Azotobacter had head yield of 31.77 t/ha which was 19.66% higher than non-inoculated plants. The increase in plant growth has been attributed to the fact that N increases the chlorophyll content of the leaves which in turn ensure production of more carbohydrates and, hence, accelerated the growth and head yield of cabbage (Sharma 2002 and Lopandic and Zaric 1997). Other factors by which Azotobacter might have promoted the growth and development of cabbage could be the synthesis of auxin, vitamins, growth substances, antifungal and antibiotics by Azotobacter. The better results obtained due to Azotobacter inoculation are also supported by the findings of Jeevajohti et al. (1993) in cabbage where they reported that growth-promoting substances secreted by microbial inoculants might have led to better root development, transport of water, uptake and deposition of nutrients. The composite application of N and biofertilizer however resulted in significant increase in head weight and head yield of cabbage. The combined application of 100 kg N/ha and biofertilizer recorded highest head yield of 37.80 t/ha which was significantly higher than the other combination treatments. Verma et al. (1997) also recorded highest vegetable and seed yield of cabbage due to application of 60 kg N/ha along with Azotobacter inoculation. These studies together suggest that Azotobacter in the presence of 100 kg N/ha could be the best option to achieve highest head yield of cabbage. In other report, Sharma et al. (2013) observed the effects of single and composite culture of Azotobacter, Azospirillum and VAM on cabbage crop. The results showed that 4 kg/ha dose of each biofertilizer resulted in maximum plant height, number of leaves per plant, diameter of stem, length and width of longest leaf and plant spread compared to other doses. Among biofertilizers, Azospirillum was found superior and significantly enhanced the growth and fresh weight of green leaves per plant to the extent of 25.85 and 15.24% over Azotobacter and VAM, respectively. Also, Azospirillum significantly enhanced the total production of trimmed head of cabbage to the extent of 7.06% compared to those observed with Azotobacter application. Among various doses of biofertilizers, 4 kg/ha dose of each biofertilizer demonstrated greatest favourable effect on field-grown cabbage production than 2 kg/ha or even 6 kg/ha dose of Azotobacter and Azospirillum. In yet other microbial approach, Ishfaq et al. (2009) applied vermicompost (0, 5 and 10 t/ha) and Azotobacter (0, 5 and 10 kg/ha) against cabbage cv. ‘Pride of India’. Application of vermicompost at 10 t/ha resulted in the tallest plant, maximum plant spread, largest size of head and highest yield of heads per plant and per hectare. The number of leaves/plant and number of wrapper leaves/head were, however, maximum with 5 t Vc/ha. Among various levels of biofertilizer inoculation, 10 kg/ha of Azotobacter application gave maximum plant height and diameter of head, maximum number of leaves/plant and number of wrapper leaves/head, while the length of head and head yield/plant were maximum with 5 kg Azotobacter/ha. Results by Hussein and Joo (2011) showed that seedling inoculation with bacterial (A. chroococcum) and fungal effective microorganisms (EM) significantly enhanced Chinese cabbage growth. Shoot dry and fresh weight and leaf length and width were significantly increased by both bacterial and fungal inoculation. However, the NPK chemical fertilizer decreased microflora inhabiting the soil, while the effective microorganisms either fungi or bacteria increased the microbial density significantly. This study implies that both fungal and bacterial EM are effective for the improvement of the Chinese cabbage growth and enhance the microorganisms in soil.
3.6.5 Broccoli (Brassica oleracea)
Broccoli is an important winter season vegetable crop which is cultivated widely in many European and American countries. It is an edible green vegetable belonging to cabbage family Brassicaceae whose large flowering head is eaten as a vegetable. Broccoli has many nutritional and medicinal values due to its high content of vitamins (A, B1, B2, B5, B6, C and E), minerals (Ca, Mg, Zn and Fe) and a number of antioxidants (Talalay and Fahey 2001; Rangkadilok et al. 2002; Rozek and Wojciechowska 2005; Wojciechowska et al. 2005). Broccoli is a rich source of sulphoraphane, a potent anticarcinogenic compound. It is a low-sodium, fat-free and low-calorie food (Decoteau 2000). Due to its variable use and great nutritional value, broccoli has attracted greater attention in recent times. For enhancing the growth, yield and head quality of broccoli, higher rates of plant nutrients are applied (Brahma and Phookan 2006). In order to reduce the usage of fertilizers in broccoli production, Abou El-Magd et al. (2014) conducted two field experiments in newly reclaimed land during two winter seasons in Egypt to study the effect of bio-nitrogen (Azospirillum brasilense and A. chroococcum) and different levels of mineral N [60, 90 and 120 kg N per feddan (one feddan = 0.42 ha)] on vegetative growth, yield and head quality of broccoli (cv. Hybrid Decathlon). Plants treated with nitrogen-fixing PGPR A. brasilense and A. chroococcum (bio-nitrogen) had higher vegetative growth, i.e. plant length, number of leaves, fresh weight of leaves, stems and total plant. The dry matter accumulation in leaves and heads, main head yield and physical head quality (weight and diameter) as well as N, P and K contents of leaves and heads were greater in nitrogen-fixing PGPR-inoculated broccoli plants compared to those found in untreated control plants. Of the two inoculants, A. chroococcum was found superior and resulted in dramatic increase in vegetative growth, main head yield and physical head quality (weight and diameter), as well as N, P and K content of leaves and heads of broccoli compared to those recorded for A. brasilense or non-inoculated control plants. Varying levels of N, however, differed statistically in their effects on the measured parameters of broccoli plants. Among N levels, 120 kg N/feddan showed the highest vegetative growth which was followed by 90 kg N/feddan. The lowest vegetative growth, main head yield, physical head quality and N, P and K of broccoli leaves and heads were, however, obtained by 60 kg N/feddan application. The present findings showed that the composite application of nitrogen-fixing PGPR and mineral N caused statistically a significant positive impact on vegetative growth, yield and nutrient uptake of broccoli. However, among all single or multiple inoculation treatments, the combined application of 120 kg N/feddan with bio-nitrogen A. brasilense resulted in the highest vegetative growth, yield and chemical contents of broccoli. Yildirim et al. (2011), on the contrary, investigated the effects of root inoculations with B. cereus (N2 fixing), Brevibacillus reuszeri (P solubilizing) and Rhizobium rubi (both N2 fixing and P solubilizing) on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of broccoli, grown in field soils, treated with manure and some fertilizers. Bacterial inoculations with manure significantly increased the yield, plant weight, head diameter, chlorophyll content and N, K, Ca, S, P, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu contents of broccoli over control. Among different treatments, manure with sole culture of B. cereus, R. rubi and B. reuszeri increased the yield by 17, 20.2 and 24.3%, respectively, and chlorophyll content by 14.7, 14 and 13.7%, respectively, over control. It was suggested from this study that seedling inoculation with P solubilizing (B. reuszeri) and both N2 fixing and P solubilizing (R. rubi) could be employed as an alternative to partially reduce the use of costly fertilizers in broccoli production.
Biofertilizers prepared from Azospirillum, PSB, Azotobacter and VAM applied alone and in combinations with/without inorganic fertilizer had variable impact on yield and quality of broccoli (Singh et al. 2014a). The composite application of Azospirillum + Azotobacter (50% each) significantly increased the curd size (15.17 cm diameter) and curd yield (1.17 kg and 0.93 kg curd with and without guard leaves, respectively) of broccoli, and this combination was found superior compared to other microbial or fertilizer applications. The results further revealed and showed that 100% application each of Azospirillum, PSB and Azotobacter also had better performance than the recommended dose of fertilizers. However, all other treatment combinations except Azospirillum + Azotobacter (50% each) performed poor than the recommended dose of fertilizer. Among the biofertilizer, the coculture of Azospirillum and Azotobacter (50% each) increased the protein and lipid profile along with phosphate and sulphate content of broccoli curd. Conclusively, the composite application of Azospirillum + Azotobacter applied each at 50% level was found better for enhancing the curd yield of broccoli and its active biomolecules.
3.6.6 Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)
Okra is an annual flowering vegetable grown for its edible pods which can be used as fresh, canned, frozen or dried food worldwide. The approximate nutrient content of the edible okra pods is as follows: water, 88%; protein, 2.1% m; fat, 0.2%; carbohydrate, 8.0%; fibre, 1.7%; and ash, 0.2% (Tindall 1983). Besides these, okra also contains minerals and vitamins. For production and maintenance, okra requires nutrients such as N, P, Ka, Ca, Na and S (Ahmed et al. 2015; Hooda et al. 1980). Deficiency of any of these nutrients resulted in poor growth and leads to a lower yield (Shukla and Nalk 1993). Therefore, an integrated approach involving bio-inoculants/bioagents and fertilizers has been practised over the years for okra production (Singh et al. 2010). The biological potential of different microbial antagonists like, Bacillus thuringiensis, nitrogen-fixing PGPR Rhizobium meliloti, Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma harzianum in the suppression of root-rotting fungi like Macrophomina phaseolina, Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium spp. inflicting losses to okra and sunflower plants, was evaluated by Dawar et al. (2008). All biocontrol agents enhanced the germination, growth, length of plant organs (shoot and root) and dry matter accumulation in shoot and root of both okra and sunflower compared to control. The length and weight of shoot and root were significantly increased in sunflower and okra when seeds were coated with R. meliloti and B. thuringiensis. Also, Rhizobium used alone as seed dressing also significantly improved plant growth and reduced disease intensity of plants. Rhizobium meliloti significantly inhibited the infection of R. solani on okra plant when R. meliloti was multiplied on leaves powder of Rhizophora mucronata plant (Tariq et al. 2007). Rhizobia which are good rhizosphere organism for leguminous or nonleguminous plants presumably prevent the contact of pathogenic fungi on roots by covering the hyphal tips of the fungus and parasitizing it. Maximum plant height was observed where seeds of okra and sunflower were coated with T. harzianum using 2% of glucose followed by gum arabic, mollases and sugar solution. Gum arabic was found more effective in reducing infection by root-rotting fungi, viz. M. phaseolina, R. solani and Fusarium spp. Of the different microbial antagonists used, T. harzianum was found more effective followed by B. thuringiensis, R. meliloti and A. niger in the control of root-rotting fungi. Similarly, Ehteshamul-Haque and Ghaffar (2008) reported that Rhizobium meliloti inhibited growth of M. phaseolina, R. solani and Fusarium solani while B. japonicum inhibited M. phaseolina and R. solani producing zones of inhibition. In field, R. meliloti, R. leguminosarum and B. japonicum used either as seed dressing or as soil drench reduced infection of M. phaseolina, R. solani and Fusarium spp., in both leguminous (soybean, mung bean) and nonleguminous (sunflower and okra) plants. Likewise, the antagonistic effects of Bacillus subtilis, B. thuringiensis, B. cereus and R. meliloti against the control of root-infecting fungi on mash bean and okra were reported by Tariq et al. (2007). Germination of seeds, shoot and root length and shoot and root weight of okra and mung bean were significantly improved following B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis, B. cereus and R. meliloti application. Infection of R. solani was significantly inhibited on okra when R. meliloti was used at 1% w/w, whereas all biocontrol bacteria, viz. B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis, B. cereus and R. meliloti, completely suppressed the infection of R. solani and M. phaseolina on mung bean.
3.6.7 Onion (Allium cepa)
Onion, a widely cultivated commercial bulbous vegetable and spice of the genus Allium, is grown worldwide. Among onion-producing countries, India ranks second and occupies 756,200 ha area with a production of 12.15 MT and productivity of 16.1 tons/ha (Anonymous 2010). Onion has stimulant, diuretic and expectorant properties and is considered useful in flatulence and dysentery. The shallow-rooted onion plants require large amounts of N for better growth, development and quality of bulb and consequently optimum production (Gamiely et al. 1991; Drost et al. 2002 and Woldetsadik et al. 2003). On the contrary, the inadequate or low N supply increases the incidence of onion bolting and limits bulb yield (Diaz-Perez et al. 2003). The application of super-optimal N has been reported to overstimulate growth and results in (1) extensive foliage growth, (2) delayed crop maturity and (3) poor bulb quality with increased storage losses (Brown et al. 1988; Brewster 1994 and Woldetsadik et al. 2003). Therefore, since both the lower and higher rates of N adversely affect the quality and quantity of onion, the careful application of N fertilizer becomes extremely important in order to improve the yielding ability and bulb quality of onion plants. Under these circumstances, synthetic nitrogenous fertilizer must be supplemented with biofertilizers especially those prepared from PGPR so that the cost of production could be reduced and quality of onion be maintained.
Like other vegetables, the production of onion is also greatly influenced by biofertilizers, organic manures and inorganic fertilizers (Banjare et al. 2015; Yeptho et al. 2012; Yadav et al. 2004). For example, the impact of single and composite culture of B. circulans, Azospirillum lipoferum, A. chrococcoum (nitrogen-fixing PGPR), B. polymyxa, Rhizobium sp. and AM fungi on growth and quality of onion bulbs was found favourable (El-Batanomy 2009). Vegetative growth and total bacterial populations in onion rhizosphere were increased due to PGPR inoculations. Additionally, the mixture of all cultures showed highest increase in dry matter and bulb diameter. The composite microbial cultures resulted in maximum nitrogenase activity (41.98 μmole C2H4/h/g RDW) and mycorrhizal infection (95%) in onion roots. The mixture of B. circulans, A. lipoferum, A. chrococcoum, B. polymyxa, Rhizobium sp. and AM fungi showed maximum NPK (4:1.97:2.91%) in dry onion shoots relative to fertilized control. Also, the total carbohydrate was highest (29.23 mg/g) in onion plants inoculated with six cultures together which was followed by co-inoculation of Rhizobium sp. and AM fungi (28.77 mg/g) and B. circulans used alone (24.9 mg/g). Similarly, Ghanti and Sharangi (2009) studied the effect of combinations of six biofertilizers [(1) Azotobacter + PSB, (2) Azotobacter + AM fungi, (3) Azotobacter + Azospirillum, (4) Azospirillum + PSB, (5) Azospirillum + AM fungi and (6) PSB + AM fungi)] and two levels of chemical fertilizers (NPK 100% and 50%) on onion cv. Sukhsagar under field experiment, carried out during the winter season. The co-inoculation of Azotobacter + VAM showed the maximum height (43.46 cm) of plants, while number of leaves, number of inflorescence/plot and bulb diameter were maximum due to inoculation with Azotobacter + Azospirillum. The composite application of Azotobacter and Azospirillum in the presence of 100% NPK produced maximum length of bulbs (6.03 cm), and the maximum number of scale per bulb (9.81) was recorded with 50% NPK. The plants grown with 100% NPK had maximum bulb weight of 67.45 g, maximum and TSS (12.29%), but the plants fertilized with 50% NPK had the highest reducing sugar (1.420%) and starch (6.27%). It was concluded from this study that the combination of Azotobacter and Azospirillum could be developed as an effective microbial pairing for enhancing the growth, yield and quality of onion. Furthermore, even though the 100% NPK fertilizer (recommended dose) produced the best result relative to combinations of biofertilizers, the application of biofertilizer should be preferred in order to achieve sustainable and safe production of onion. Balemi (2006) conducted a field experiment using four levels of N (0, 25, 50 and 75% recommended doses) and three strains (CBD-15, AS-4 and M-4) of Azotobacter with two uninoculated controls, one with the full dose of N and the other without NPK during summer season against onion cultivar Pusa Madhvi to identify a suitable Azotobacter strain and N level for better yield and quality of onion. Application of 75% recommended N along with Azotobacter CBD-15 or M-4 significantly increased the marketable yield and the N content in both leaves and bulbs, over control (full dose of N), whereas only 75% recommended N + Azotobacter CBD-15 significantly increased the total yield. However, total soluble solids and neck thickness were significantly reduced by 50% recommended N applied with CBD-15 or M-4 compared with the uninoculated control (full N dose). Azotobacter strains in the presence of 50 or 75% recommended N significantly reduced the sprouting loss during storage, while nitrogen-fixing PGPR in the presence of 50 or 25% recommended N doses significantly reduced rotting and total losses. Inoculation with a mixture of N-fixing bacteria (Azospirillum, Azotobacter and Klebsiella), biofertilizer (Halex 2) alone or combined with four levels of N (00, 30, 60 and 90 kg N/fed.) had a variable impact on growth, yield components and bulb quality of onion (Yaso et al. 2007). A significant increase in plant height and number of leaves, average bulb weight and marketable and total bulb yield were observed following consistent increase in N levels. Inoculation of onion transplants with Halex 2 significantly improved onion bulb yield and its components (average bulb weight and marketable yield), in both seasons, and accelerated the maturity of onion bulbs in the first season but did not significantly influence vegetative growth and bulb quality characters (plant height, number of leaves and percentages of single and double bulbs, bolters, TSS and sprouted bulbs). Among all treatments, combination of 60 kg N/fed and biofertilizer (Halex 2) was found as the best combination which gave the maximum marketable yield and total bulb yield. The use of Halex 2 could replace one-third of the used chemical N fertilizer and, consequently, improve the economics of onion production. In other study, significant increase in growth and yield of onion plants due to the synthesis of IAA, siderophores and P-solubilizing activity of B. subtilis and A. chroococcum is reported (Colo et al. 2014). The longest seedling was observed due to inoculation with A. chroococcum, while all inoculated plants had maximum height recorded 60 days after sowing. The onion yield was highest when plants were bacterized with B. subtilis and A. chroococcum.
3.6.8 Radish and Daikon (Raphanus sativus)
Radish, a native of Europe and Asia (Gill 1993), is a popularly grown root vegetable which belongs to the family Cruciferae. In many countries like India, it is grown almost everywhere throughout the year. The fusiform roots of radish are eaten raw as salad or as cooked vegetable. Its leaves are rich in minerals and vitamins A and C and are also cooked as leafy vegetable. Like many other nonlegumes, growth and development of radish are also influenced by some nitrogen-fixing PGPR. For instance, B. japonicum strain Soy 213 among 266 PGPR strains tested by Antoun et al. (1998) showed the highest stimulatory effect on radish plant. A maximum of 60% increase in stimulatory effect was obtained with B. japonicum, while about 25% of all strains of rhizobia and bradyrhizobia, in general, increased radish growth by 20% or more. Similarly, strain Tal 629 of B. japonicum significantly increased the dry matter yield of radish by 15% over control in a second plant inoculation assay. It was concluded from these experiments that rhizobia like many other PGPR could also be used as traditional PGPR for enhancing the production of vegetables. In a follow-up study, Basavaraju et al. (2002) reported the effect of asymbiotic nitrogen-fixing PGPR Azotobacter strains C1 and C2 on germination and seedling development of radish grown under controlled conditions. Of the two strains, strain C2 of A. chroococcum maximally enhanced the germination percentage by 9.33%, radical length by 90.47% and plumule length by 54.37% over uninoculated control. Furthermore, inoculation of radish seeds with Azotobacter showed increase in plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, root girth, root length, fresh and dry weights of root and leaf and root N contents over uninoculated control. However, Azotobacter in the presence of 75% recommended dose of N per ha was found to be more advantageous and helped to reduce dependence on nitrogenous fertilizers while maintaining good yields. Shukla et al. (2012) carried out an experiment with radish cv. Chinese pink using synthetic fertilizers (N, P and K) and biofertilizers (Azospirillum, phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria and AM fungi). Seed yield (10.2 q per ha), 1000 seed weight and seedling vigour index-II were recorded maximum with the combined application of Azospirillum + recommended rates of NPK. Ziaf et al. (2016) in a recent study evaluated the effect of nitrogen-fixing PGPR like Azotobacter spp., PSB, germinator (Ger, a synthetic germination and early growth enhancer) and PSB + Ger in combination with full (recommended dose of fertilizer), half dose of N and half dose of P on yield of radish cv. ‘Mino Early’. The results revealed that Azotobacter spp. improved plant- and yield-related attributes, while germinator negatively affected them. The combined application of PSB and recommended dose of fertilizer resulted in maximum number of leaves per plant, root fresh weight and marketable yield. On the contrary, the application of Azotobacter spp. in combination with half dose of N and half dose of P showed the highest leaf fresh weight, above ground plant biomass, biological yield, agronomic efficiency and yield response. Moreover, root diameter increased when PSB or Azotobacter spp. was applied with recommended dose of fertilizer, while plants treated with Azotobacter spp. along with a half dose of P had the longest roots. Correlation analysis revealed that marketable yield of radish was dependent on root fresh weight.
3.6.9 Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)
Lettuce is considered as one of the most important vegetable crops grown in many countries. It is reported that 100 g of lettuce contain 95% water, 1 g of protein, 3 g carbohydrate, Ca (22 mg), P (25 mg) and vitamin A (Work and Carew 1955). Among many factors, fertilizer application is the most important factor that affects greatly the quantity and quality of lettuce. However, the excessive use of fertilizers negatively affects its production, and hence, the combination of chemical and biological fertilizers is recommended for this crop so that the quality of lettuce is maintained while preserving the soil fertility (Forlin et al. 2008; Sarhan 2008). For example, Sarhan (2012) carried out an experiment during winter season to investigate the effects of nitrogen-fixing bacterium (Azotobacter) with different levels of N (100, 200, 300 kg/ha) and without Azotobacter (N alone) on growth, yield quantity and quality of lettuce. The results revealed a significant increase in measured characteristics such as plant height, leaves number, length of stem, fresh and dry weight of head, head diameter and head yield following application of Azotobacter with low levels of N. Chabot et al. (1996a) on the other examined the single and composite effect of symbiotic nodule forming R. leguminosarum bv. phaseoli strains P31 and R1, Serratia sp. strain 22b, Pseudomonas sp. strain 24 and Rhizopus sp. strain 68 on lettuce and forage maize, grown in field conditions having high to low amounts of available P. The composite inoculation of strains R1 of R. leguminosarum and 22b of Serratia sp. significantly increased the dry matter yield of lettuce shoots where lettuce inoculated with R. leguminosarum R1 had a 6% higher P concentration than the uninoculated control. Similarly, at other experimental site (poorly fertile soil), the dry matter of lettuce shoots was significantly increased by inoculation of R. leguminosarum strain P31 and Pseudomonas sp. 24 along with 35 kg/ha P superphosphate or with Rhizopus sp. strain 68 plus 70 kg/ha P superphosphate. The present findings clearly demonstrated that rhizobia expressing P solubilization activity can also function as PGPR with nonlegumes especially lettuce and maize. In a follow-up experiment, Chabot et al. (1996b) assessed the effects of two strains of R. leguminosarum bv. phaseoli and three other PGPR on maize and lettuce root colonization. Maize and lettuce seeds were treated with derivatives of all strains marked with lux genes for bioluminescence and resistance to kanamycin and rifampin prior to planting in non-sterile Promix and natural soil. The introduced bacterial strains were quantified on roots by dilution plating on antibiotic media together with observation of bioluminescence. Rhizobia were found as superior colonizers compared with other tested bacteria; rhizobial populations were 4.1 CFU/g (fresh weight) on maize roots 4 weeks after seeding, while 3.7 CFU/g (fresh weight) was found on lettuce roots 5 weeks after seeding. The average populations of the recovered PGPR strains were 3.5 and 3 CFU/g (fresh weight) on maize and lettuce roots, respectively. Bioluminescence also revealed in situ root colonization in rhizoboxes and showed the ability of rhizobial strains to colonize and survive on maize and lettuce roots. In a study, Galleguillos et al. (2000) observed that the rhizobial strains increased very efficiently the lettuce biomass and also induced modifications on root morphology, particularly in mycorrhizal plants suggesting that these strains behaved as PGPR. However, rhizobial strains differed in mycorrhizal plants with regard to (1) the biomass production, (2) the length of axis and lateral roots and (3) the number of lateral roots formed; effects which were, in turn, affected by the AM fungus are involved. Microbial treatments were more effective in terms of growth and morphology of roots at 20 days of plant growth, but after 40 days, the microbial inoculation profoundly increased plant biomass. The interaction between the AM fungi (Glomus mosseae) and rhizobial strain had the maximum growth-promoting effect (476% over control) despite the fact that G. intraradices showed a quicker and higher colonization ability than G. mosseae. Flores-Félix et al. (2013) assessed the impact of R. leguminosarum strain PEPV16 on crops like lettuce and carrot and observed a significant increase in macro- and micronutrients of both lettuce and carrots. Also, the rhizobial inoculation enhanced the N and P uptake by lettuce and carrot plants. The P uptake in lettuce shoots was increased by 15, while 40% increase in P concentration was recorded in carrot roots. Increase in Fe content of both crops was attributed to the production of siderophores by R. leguminosarum strain PEPV16.
3.6.10 Spinach (Spinacia oleracea)
Spinach, an annual member of Chenopodiaceae family, is a valuable leafy vegetable. It is a rich source of chlorophyll, which gives spinach a dark-green colour, good quality and consumer acceptance. Also, spinach is a low-calorie vegetable but contains unusually high minerals like iron, vitamin A and vitamin C contents, which add nutritive value to it. For enhancing growth, yield, seed production and quality of spinach, nitrogenous and phosphorus fertilizers are frequently applied. However, like other vegetables, the quantity and quality of spinach also suffer from uncontrolled application of such fertilizers. And hence, like many crops, the use of biofertilizers has also been suggested as a cheap and viable option for optimizing the production of spinach. For example, the application of nitrogen-fixing PGPR such as Azotobacter chroccocum and phosphorein when used singly or in combination with different rates of N and P fertilizers showed a variable effect on growth, yield, sex ratio and seeds (yield and quality) of spinach plants cv. Dokki (El-Assiouty and Abo-Sedera 2005). Seed inoculation with 300 g phosphorein inoculum/fed. in the presence of 40 kg N/fed. (100% of the recommended N dose) + 15 or 7.5 kg P/fed. (66.7 or 33% of the recommended dose of P2O5) and seeds inoculated with 300 g Azotobacter inoculum in the presence of the full dose of P2O5 (22.5 kg P2O5/fed.) + 50% of the full dose of N (20 kg/fed) demonstrated the optimum favourable impact on growth, yield, sex ratio and higher seed yield with the best quality relative to control (40 kg N + 22.5 kg P2O5 fed.). The populations of inoculated microbes were higher in spinach rhizosphere when seeds were inoculated with Azotobacter and phosphorein compared with uninoculated control. Among all treatments, application of 40 kg N + 15 kg P2O5 + 300 g phosphorein increased plant fresh yield by 27.2 and 42.3% and 16.3 and 10.4% seed yield over control in the first and second seasons, respectively.
Conclusion
Nitrogen fixers are well known for their beneficial effect resulting from the symbiotic and asymbiotic nitrogen fixation with legumes and other crops including vegetables. In this work, we have tried to showcase the beneficial activity of two contrasting nitrogen fixers on the overall performance of different vegetables grown distinctively in different agroclimatic regions of the world. The advantages of using nitrogen fixers as PGPR are the easy availability of the technology for inocula production and seed inoculation and the better understanding of the functional diversity and genetics of these bacteria. In addition, they have been used in agronomic practices since very long without any adverse impact, they can, therefore, be considered as environmentally benign PGPR for nonlegumes. The work presented here is likely to help vegetable growers to optimize the vegetable production through the use of inexpensive and environmentally safe nitrogen-fixing PGPR while reducing the dependence on chemical input in vegetable production system across the globe.
References
Abayomi OA, Adebayo OJ (2014) Effect of fertilizer types on the growth and yield of Amaranthus caudatus in Ilorin, Southern Guinea, Savanna Zone of Nigeria. Adv Agric 2014: 5. Article ID: 947062
Abd-Alla MH (1994) Use of organic phosphorus by Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar. viceae phosphatases. Biol Fertil Soils 18:216–218
Abdelaziz M, Pokluda R, Abdelwahab M (2007) Influence of compost, microorganisms and NPK fertilizer upon growth, chemical composition and essential oil production of Rosmarinus officinalis. Not Bot Hortic Agrobot Cluj 35:1842–4309
Abou El-Magd MM, Zaki MF, Abo Sedera SA (2014) Effect of bio-nitrogen as a partial alternative to mineral-nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and head quality of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. Italica). World Appl Sci J 31:681–691
Ahmad E, Khan MS, Zaidi A (2013) ACC deaminase producing Pseudomonas putida strain PSE3 and Rhizobium leguminosarum strain RP2 in synergism improves growth, nodulation and yield of pea grown in alluvial soils. Symbiosis 61:93–104
Ahmed A, Mohsen M, Abdel-Fattah MK (2015) Effect of different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer in combination with botanical compost on growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) under sandy soil conditions in Egypt. Asian J Agric Res 9:249–258
Anandaraj B, Delapierre LRA (2010) Studies on influence of bioinoculants (Pseudomonas fluorescens, Rhizobium sp., Bacillus megaterium) in green gram. J Biosci Tech 1:95–99
Anonymous (2006) Invasive species and poverty: exploring the links. GISP Global Invasive Species Programme, Cape Town, South Africa
Anonymous (2010) Annual report. National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India
Antoun H, Beauchamp CJ, Goussard N, Chabot R, Lalande R (1998) Potential of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium species as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on non-legumes: effect on radishes (Raphanus sativus L.) Plant Soil 204:57–67
Balakrishnan R (1988) Studies on the effect of Azospirillum, nitrogen and NAA on growth and yield of chilli. South Indian Hortic 36:218
Balemi T (2006) Effect of integrated use of Azotobacter and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.) Acta Agron Hung 54:499–505
Banjare C, Shukla N, Sharma PK et al (2015) Effect of organic substances on yield and quality of onion, Allium cepa L. Int J Farm Sci 5(1):30–35
Barrett CF, Parker MA (2006) Coexistence of Burkholderia, Cupriavidus, and Rhizobium sp. nodule bacteria on two Mimosa spp. in Costa Rica. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1198–1206
Basavaraju O, Rao ARM, Shankarappa TH (2002) Effect of Azotobacter inoculation and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) In: Rajak RC (ed) Biotechnology of microbes and sustainable utilization. Scientific Publishers, Jabalpur, India, pp 155–160
Beijerinck MW (1888) Culture des Bacillus radicicola aus den Knollchen. Bot Ztg 46:740–750
Bhadoria SKS, Dwivedi YC, Kushwah SS (2005) Effect of Azotobacter inoculation with nitrogen levels on quality characters of tomato. Veg Sci 32:94–95
Bhagat D, Sharma P, Sirari A et al (2014) Screening of Mesorhizobium spp. for control of Fusarium wilt in chickpea in vitro conditions. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 3:923–930
Bhakare GC, Deokar CD, Navale AM et al (2008) Comparative performance of Azotobacter biofertilizers on growth and yield of brinjal. Asian J Hortic 3:377–379
Bhattacharjee RB, Singh A, Mukhopadhyay SN (2008) Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria as biofertilizer for non-legumes: prospects and challenges. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 80:199–209
Bhattacharjee RB, Philippe J, Clémence C, Bernard D, Aqbal S, Satya NM (2012) Indole acetic acid and ACC deaminase-producing Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii SN10 promote rice growth, and in the process undergo colonization and chemotaxis. Biol Fertil Soils 48:173–182
Bhosale HJ, Kadam TA, Bobade AR (2013) Identification and production of Azotobacter vinelandii and its antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum. J Environ Biol 34:177–182
Bobadi S, Van Damme P (2003) Effect of nitrogen application on flowering and yield of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 68:5–13
Brahma S, Phookan DB (2006) Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on yield and economics of broccoli [Brassica oleracea (L.) var. italica] cv. Pusa. Res Crops 7:261–262
Brewster JL (1994) Onions and other vegetable Alliums. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, p 236
Brown BD, Hornbacher AJ, Naylor DV (1988) Sulfur coated urea as a slow-release nitrogen source for onions. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 113:864–869
Chabot R, Antoun H, Cescas MP (1996a) Growth promotion of maize and lettuce by phosphate-solubilizing Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli. Plant Soil 184:311–321
Chabot R, Antoun H, Kloepper JW et al (1996b) Root colonization of maize and lettuce by bioluminescent Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2767–2772
Chakravarty G, Kalita MC (2012) Biocontrol potential of Pseudomonas fluorescens against bacterial wilt of brinjal and its possible plant growth promoting effects. Ann Biol Res 3:5083–5094
Chattoo MA, Gandroo MY, Zargar MY (1997) Effect of Azospirillum and Azotobacter on growth, yield and quality of knol khol (Brassica oleracea L. Var. Gongylodes). Veg Sci 24:16–19
Chen WM, de Faria SM, James EK et al (2007) Burkholderia nodosa sp. nov., isolated from root nodules of the woody Brazilian legumes Mimosa bimucronata and Mimosa scabrella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1055–1059
Chi F, Shen SH, Cheng HP et al (2005) Ascending migration of endophytic rhizobia from roots to leaves, inside rice plants and assessment of benefits to rice growth physiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7271–7278
Choudhary B (1976) Vegetables, 4th edn. National Book Trust, New Delhi, pp 50–58
Colo J, Hajnal-Jafari TI, Durić S et al (2014) Plant growth promotion rhizobacteria in onion production. Pol J Microbiol 63:83–88
Datta B, Chakrabartty PK (2014) Siderophore biosynthesis genes of Rhizobium sp. isolated from Cicer arietinum L. 3 Biotech 4:391–401
Dawar S, Hayat S, Anis M et al (2008) Effect of seed coating material in the efficacy of microbial antagonists for the control of root rot fungi on okra and sunflower. Pak J Bot 40(3):1269–1278
Dazzo FB, Yanni YG (2006) The natural rhizobium-cereal crop association as an example of plant-bacterial interaction. In: Uphoff N, Ball AS, Fernandes E, Herren H, Husson O, Laing M, Palm C, Pretty J, Sanchez P, Sanginga N, Thies J (eds) Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 109–127
Decoteau DR (2000) Vegetable crops. Upper Rever Company, New Jersey, USA
Diaz-Perez JC, Purvis AC, Paulk JT (2003) Bolting, yield, and bulb decay of sweet onion as affected by nitrogen fertilization. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:144–149
Dixit SK, Sanjay K, Meena ML et al (2007) Bio-fertilizers may be a substitute of chemical fertilizers. Asian J Agric Sci 2(2):298–300
Doifode VD, Nandkar PB (2014) Influence of biofertilizers on the growth, yield and quality of brinjal crop. Int J Life Sci A2:17–20
Dorais M, Ehret DL, Papadopoulos AP (2008) Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) health components: from the seed to the consumer. Phytochem Rev 7:231–250
Drost D, Koenig R, Tindall T (2002) Nitrogen use efficiency and onion yield increased with a polymer-coated nitrogen source. Hortic Sci 37:338–342
Ehteshamul-Haque S, Ghaffar A (2008) Use of rhizobia in the control of root rot diseases of sunflower, okra, soybean and mungbean. J Phytopathol 138:157–163
El-Assiouty FMM, Abo-Sedera SA (2005) Effect of bio and chemical fertilizers on seed production and quality of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) Int J Agric Biol 7:947–949
Elazzazy AM, Almaghrabi OA, Moussa TAA et al (2012) Evaluation of some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (pgpr) to control Pythium aphanidermatum in cucumber plants. Life Sci J 9:3147–3153
El-Batanomy N (2009) Synergistic effect of plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on onion (Allium cepa) growth and its bulbs quality after storage. New Egypt J Microbiol 23:163–182
Elmerich C, Newton WE (2007) Associative and endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacteria and cyanobacterial associations. Springer, The Netherlands, p 323
El-Sirafy MZ, Sarhan SH, Abd-El Hafez AA, Baddour AGA (2010) Effect of the interaction between Azotobacter inoculation; organic and mineral fertilization on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) J Soil Sci Agric Eng 1:93–104
Fageria MS, Arya PS, Jagmohan K et al (1992) Effects of nitrogen levels on growth, yield and quality of tomato. Veg Sci 19:25–29
Flores FB, Sanchez-Bel P, Estan MT, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Moyano E, Morales B, Campos JF, Garcia-Abellán JO, Egea MI, Fernández-Garcia N, Romojaro F, Bolarín M (2010) The effectiveness of grafting to improve tomato fruit quality. Sci Hortic 125:211–217
Flores-Félix JD, Menéndez E, Rivera LP et al (2013) Use of Rhizobium leguminosarum as a potential biofertilizer for Lactuca sativa and Daucus carota crops. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176:876–882
Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2010) Crop water information: tomato. www.fao.org/nr/water/cropinfo_tomato.html
Forlin MB, Pastorelli R, Sarvilli S (2008) Root potentially related properties in plant associated bacteria. J Gen Breed Italy 49:343–352
Frank B (1889) Uber die Pilzsymbiose der leguminosen. Berichte der Deutschen Beru Deut Bot Ges 7:332–346
Galleguillos C, Aguirre C, Barea JM, Azcon R (2000) Growth promoting effect of two Sinorhizobium meliloti strains (a wild type and its genetically modified derivative) on a non-legume plant species in specific interaction with two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Sci 159:57–63
Gamiely S, Randle WM, Mills HA et al (1991) Onion plant growth, bulb quality, and water uptake following ammonium and nitrate nutrition. Hortic Sci 26:1061–1063
Gandhi Pragash M, Narayanan KB, Naik PR et al (2009) Characterization of Chryseobacterium aquaticum strain PUPC1 producing a novel antifungal protease from rice rhizosphere soil. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:99–107
García-Fraile P, Carro L, Robledo M et al (2012) Rhizobium promotes non-legumes growth and quality in several production steps: towards a biofertilization of edible raw vegetables healthy for humans. PLoS One 7:38122
Ghanti S, Sharangi AB (2009) Effect of bio-fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of onion cv. Sukhsagar. J Crop Weed 5:120–123
Ghosh PK, De TK, Maiti TK (2015) Production and metabolism of indole acetic acid in root nodules and symbiont (Rhizobium undicola) isolated from root nodule of aquatic medicinal legume Neptunia oleracea Lour. J Bot 2015:11. Article ID: 575067
Gill HS (1993) Improvement of root crops. In: Chadha KL, Kalloo G (eds) Advances in horticulture, vol 5. Malhotra Book Depot, New Delhi, pp 201–206
Graham PH (2008) Ecology of the root-nodule bacteria of legumes. In: Dilworth MJ, James EK, Spent JI, Newton WE (eds) Nitrogen-fixing leguminous symbioses. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 23–58
Guertal EA (2009) Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers in vegetable production: a review. Hortic Technol 19:16–19
Guo Z, He C, Ma Y et al (2011) Effect of different fertilization on spring cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) production and fertilizer use efficiencies. Agric Sci 2:208–212
Halder AK, Chakrabarty PK (1991) Solubilization of inorganic phosphates by Rhizobium. Folia Microbiol 38:325–330
Hooda RS, Pandita ML, Sidhu AS (1980) Studies on the effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and green pod yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Haryana J Hortic Sci 9:180–183
Hussain AM, Arshad SM, Javed M (1993) Potential of Azotobacter for promoting potato growth and yield under optimum fertilizer application. Pak J Agric Sci 30:217–220
Hussein KA, Joo JH (2011) Effects of several effective microorganisms (EM) on the growth of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa). Korean J Soil Sci Fert 44:565–574
Ibiene AA, Agogbua JU, Okonko IO, Nwachi GN (2012) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as biofertilizer: effect on growth of Lycopersicon esculentus. J Am Sci 8:318–324
Igual JM, Valverde A, Cervantes E, Velázquez E (2001) Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria as inoculants for agriculture: use of updated molecular techniques in their study. Agronomie 21:561–568
Imen H, Neila A, Adnane B et al (2015) Inoculation with phosphate solubilizing Mesorhizobium strains improves the performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under phosphorus deficiency. J Plant Nutr 38:1656–1671
Iqbal MA, Khalid M, Shahzad SM, Ahmad M, Soleman N, Akhtar N (2012) Integrated use of Rhizobium leguminosarum, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and enriched compost for improving growth, nodulation and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Chilean J Agric Res 72:104–110
Ishfaq AP, Vijai K, Faheem MM (2009) Effect of bio-organic fertilizers on the performance of cabbage under western U.P. conditions. Ann Hortic 2:204–206
Islam MR, Sultana T, Joe MM et al (2013) Nitrogen-fixing bacteria with multiple plant growth-promoting activities enhance growth of tomato and red pepper. J Basic Microbiol 53:1004–1015
Jeevajohti L, Mani AK, Pappiah CM et al (1993) Influence of N, P, K and Azospirillum on the yield of cabbage. South Indian Hortic 41:270–272
Kantharajah AS, Golegaonkar PG (2004) Somatic embryogenesis in eggplant review. J Sci Hortic 99:107–117
Karpagam T, Nagalakshmi PK (2014) Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing microbes from agricultural soil. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 3:601–614
Keel C, Schnider U, Maurhofer M et al (1992) Suppression of root diseases by Pseudomonas fluorescens CHAO: importance of bacterial secondary metabolite, 2,4-diacetylphoroglucinol. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 5:4–13
Kumar PR, Ram MR (2012) Production of indole acetic acid by Rhizobium isolates from Vigna trilobata (L) Verdc. Afr J Microbiol Res 6:5536–5541
Kumar V, Jaiswal RC, Singh AP (2001) Effect of biofertilizer on growth and yield of potato. J Indian Potato Assoc 28:60–61
Kumar A, Kumar K, Kumar P et al (2014) Production of indole acetic acid by Azotobacter strains associated with mungbean. Plant Archives 14:41–42
Lamo K (2009) Effect of organic and bio-fertilizers on seed production of radish (Raphanus sativus L) cv Chinese Pink. M.Sc. thesis, Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, India
Latha P, Jeyaraman S, Prabakaran R (2014) Effect of microbial and chemical fertilizer on egg plant (Solanum melongena Linn.) C.Var CO-2. Int J Pure Appl Biosci 2:119–124
Lesueur D, Carr Del Rio M, Dien HG (1995) Modification of the growth and the competitiveness of Bradyrhizobium strain obtained through affecting its siderophore-producing ability. In: Abadia J (ed) Iron nutrition in soil and plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Pays Bas, pp 59–66
Lindstrom K, Martinez-Romero ME (2005) International committee on systematics of prokaryotes; subcommittee on the taxonomy of Agrobacterium and Rhizobium: minutes of the meeting, 26 July 2004, Toulouse, France. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1383
Loganathan M, Garg R, Venkataravanappa V et al (2014) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) induces resistance against Fusarium wilt and improves lycopene content and texture in tomato. Afr J Microbiol Res 8:1105–1111
Lopandic D, Zaric D (1997) Effect of nitrogen rates and application dates on cabbage yield. Acta Hortic 462:595–598
Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556
Ma W, Charles TC, Glick BR (2004) Expression of an exogenous 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase gene in Sinorhizobium meliloti increases its ability to nodulate alfalfa. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5891–5897
Machado RG, Sá ELS, Bruxel M, Giongo A, Santos NS, Nunes AS (2013) Indoleacetic acid producing rhizobia promote growth of Tanzania grass (Panicum maximum) and Pensacola grass (Paspalum saurae). Int J Agric Biol 15:827–834
Mahajan G, Singh KG (2006) Response of greenhouse tomato to irrigation and fertigation. Agric Water Manage 84:202–206
Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London
Martinez R, Dibut B, Ganzalez R (1993) Stimulation of tomato development and yield by inoculation of red ferralitic soils with Azotobacter chroocucum. Memorias - 11th - Congress - Latinoamerican - de – da - suelo 5:1396–1398
Meshram SU (1984) Suppressive effect of Azotobacter chroococcum on Rhizoctonia solani infestation of potatoes. Neth J Plant Pathol 90:127–132
Mirshekari B, Alipour MH (2013) Potato (Solanum tuberosum) seed bio-priming influences tuber yield in new released cultivars. Int J Biosci 3:26–31
Mohammadi GR, Ajirloo AR, Ghobadi ME et al (2013) Effects of non-chemical and chemical fertilizers on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield and quality. J Med Plant Res 7:36–42
Muthuselvan I, Balagurunathan R (2013) Siderophore production from Azotobacter sp. and its application as biocontrol agent. Int J Curr Res Rev 5(11):23–35
Nabti E, Bensidhoum L, Tabli N et al (2014) Growth stimulation of barley and biocontrol effect on plant pathogenic fungi by a Cellulosimicrobium sp. strain isolated from salt-affected rhizosphere soil in northwestern Algeria. Eur J Soil Biol 61:20–26
Nanthakumar S, Veeragavathatham D (2000) Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth parameters and yield of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) cv. PLR-1. South Indian Hortic 48:31–35
Naqqash T, Hameed S, Imran A et al (2016) Differential response of potato toward inoculation with taxonomically diverse plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Front Plant Sci 7:144
Narula N, Gupta KG (1986) Ammonia excretion by Azotobacter chroococcum in liquid culture and soil in the presence of manganese and clay minerals. Plant Soil 93:205–209
Noel TC, Sheng C, Yost CK et al (1996) Rhizobium leguminosarum as plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium: direct growth promotion of canola and lettuce. Can J Microbiol 42:279–283
Nosrati R, Owlia P, Saderi H et al (2014) Phosphate solubilization characteristics of efficient nitrogen fixing soil Azotobacter strains. Iran J Microbiol 6:285–295
Okon Y, Itzisohn R (1995) The development of Azospirillum as a commercial inoculant for improving crop yields. Biotechnol Adv 13:414–424
Olowoake AA, Adeoye GO (2010) Comparative efficacy of NPK fertilizer and composted organic residues on growth, nutrient absorption and dry matter accumulation in maize. Int J Org Agric Res Dev 2:43–53
Orhan E, Esitken A, Ercisli S et al (2006) Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, growth and nutrient contents in organically growing raspberry. Sci Hortic 111:38–43
Osman AS (2007) Effect of partial substitution of mineral-N by bio-fertilization on growth, yield and yield components of potato. In: The third conference of sustainable agriculture development, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, 12–14 Nov, pp 381–396
Palm CA, Gachengo CN, Delve RJ et al (2001) Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agro ecosystems: application of an organic resource database. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:27–42
Panhwar QA, Naher UA, Jusop S, Othman R, Latif MA, Ismail MR (2014) Biochemical and molecular characterization of potential phosphate solubilizing bacteria in acid sulphate soils and their beneficial effects on rice growth. PLoS One 9(10):PMC4186749
Parveen G, Ehteshamul-Haque S, Sultana V et al (2008) Suppression of root pathogens of tomato by rhizobia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and mineral fertilizers. Int J Veg Sci 14:205–215
Pena-Cabriales JJ, Alexander M (1983) Growth of Rhizobium in unamended soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:81–84
Prasad JS, Reddy RS, Reddy PN et al (2014) Isolation, screening and characterization of Azotobacter from rhizospheric soils for different plant growth promotion (pgp) & antagonistic activities and compatibility with agrochemicals: an in vitro study. Ecol Environ Conserv 20:959–966
Prayitno J, Stefaniak J, Mciver J et al (1999) Interactions of rice seedlings with bacteria isolated from rice roots. Aust J Plant Physiol 26:521–535
Ramakrishnan K, Selvakumar G (2012) Effect of biofertilizers on enhancement of growth and yield on tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) Int J Res Bot 2:20–23
Rangkadilok N, Nicolas ME, Bennett RN et al (2002) Determination of sinigrin and glucoraphanin in Brassica species using a simple extraction method combined with ion-pair HPLC analysis. Sci Hortic 96:27–41
Rao DLN (1986) Nitrogen fixation in free living and associative symbiotic bacteria. In: Subba Rao NS (ed) Soil microorganisms and plant growth. Oxford and IBH Pub. Co., New Delhi
Reddy PM, Ladha JK, So RB et al (1997) Rhizobial communication with rice roots: induction of phenotypic changes, mode of invasion and extent of colonization. Plant Soil 194:81–98
Reimann S, Hauschild R, Hildebrandt U, Sikora RA (2008) Interrelationships between Rhizobium etli G12 and Glomus intraradices and multitrophic effects in the biological control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on tomato. J Plant Dis Protect 115:108–113
Reyes VG, Schimidt EL (1979) Population densities of Rhizobium japonicum strain 123 estimated directly in soil and rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:854–858
Rozek S, Wojciechowska R (2005) Effect of urea foliar application and different levels of nitrogen on broccoli head yield and its quality in autumn growing cycle. Sodininkyste-ir Darzininkyste 24:291–301
Ruangsanka S (2014) Identification of phosphate-solubilizing fungi from the asparagus rhizosphere as antagonists of the root and crown rot pathogen Fusarium oxysporum. ScienceAsia 40:16–20
Sahar P, Sahi ST, Jabbar A, Rehman A, Riaz K, Hannan A (2013) Chemical and biological management of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melongenae. Pak J Phytopathol 25:155–159
Sahasrabudhe MM (2011) Screening of rhizobia for indole acetic acid production. Ann Biol Res 2:460–468
Sahgal M, Johri BN (2003) The changing face of rhizobial systematics. Curr Sci 84:43–48
Sarhan TZ (2008) Effect of biological fertilizers, animal residues and urea on growth and yield of potato plant cv. desiree Solanum tuberosum L. Ph.D. thesis, Horticulture Science and Landscape Design (Vegetable), University of Mosul, College of Agriculture and Forestry, Iraq
Sarhan TZ (2012) Effect of biofertilizer and different levels of nitrogen (urea) on growth, yield and quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Ramadi cv. J Agric Sci Technol B2:137–141
Sarkar A, Mandal AR, Prasad PH et al (2010) Influence of nitrogen and biofertilizer on growth and yield of cabbage. J Crop Weed 6:72–73
Shafeek MR, Fatin S, El-Al A et al (2004) The productivity of broad been plant as affected by chemical and/or natural phosphorus with different biofertilizer. J Agric Sci 29:2727–2740
Sharafzadeh S (2012) Effects of PGPR on growth and nutrients uptake of tomato. Int J Adv Eng Technol 2:27–31
Sharma SK (2002) Effect of Azospirillum, Azotobacter and nitrogen on growth and yield of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var capitata). Indian J Agric Sci 72:555–557
Sharma P, Saikia MK (2013) Management of late blight of potato through chemicals. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 2:23–36
Sharma D, Singh RK, Parmar AS (2013) Effect of doses of biofertilizers on the growth and production of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. Var. Capitata). TECHNOFAME-J Multidiscipl Adv Res 2:30–33
Shimaa D, Marwa AS, Doaa K et al (2015) Production of hydroxamate siderophores by Azotobacter chroococcum bacterium. Menofia J Agric Res 40:409
Shimshick EJ, Hebert RR (1979) Binding characteristics of N2-fixing bacteria to cereal roots. Appl Environ Microbiol 38:447–453
Shukla V, Nalk LB (1993) Agro-technique for malvaceae vegetables. In: Shukla V, Nalk LB (eds) Ifovance in horticulture, vol 5. Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi, India, pp 399–425
Shukla YR, Mehta S, Sharma R (2012) Effect of integrated nutrient management on seed yield and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L) cv Chinese Pink. Int J Farm Sci 2:47–53
Sidorenko O, Storozhenko V, Kokharen Kova O (1996) The use of bacterial preparation in potato cultivation. Mezhdunarodngi, Sel: Skokhozyaistvenny Zhurnal 6:36–38
Sihachkr D, Chaput MH, Serraf L et al (1993) Regeneration of plants from protoplasts of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, plant protoplasts and genetic engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 108–122
Silva LR, Azevedo J, Pereira MJ et al (2014) Inoculation of the nonlegume Capsicum annum (L.) with Rhizobium strains: effect on bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, and fruit ripeness. J Agric Food Chem 62:557–564
Singh AB, Singh SS (1992) Effect of various levels of nitrogen and spacing on growth, yield and quality of tomato. Veg Sci 19:1–6
Singh NP, Sachan RS, Pandey PC (1999) Effect of a decade long fertilizer and manure application on soil fertility and productivity of rice-wheat system in Molisols. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 47:72–80
Singh JK, Bahadur A, Singh NK, Singh TB (2010) Effect of using varying level of NPK and biofertilizers on vegetative growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Veg Sci 37:100–101
Singh S, Gupta G, Khare E et al (2014a) Phosphate solubilizing rhizobia promote the growth of chickpea under buffering conditions. Int J Pure Appl Biosci 2:97–106
Singh BK, Singh S, Singh BK (2014b) Some important plant pathogenic disease of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) and their management. Plant Pathol J 13:208–213
Solanki MP, Patel BN, Tandel YN (2010) Growth, yield and quality of brinjal as affected by use of bio-fertilizers. Asian J Hortic 5:403–406
Spaepen S, Das F, Luyten E et al (2009) Indole-3-acetic acid-regulated genes in Rhizobium etli CNPAF512: research letter. FEMS Microbiol Lett 291:195–200
Tahir M, Mirza MS, Zaheer A, Dimitrov MR, Smidt H, Hameed S (2013) Isolation and identification of phosphate solubilizer Azospirillum, Bacillus and Enterobacter strains by 16SrRNA sequence analysis and their effect on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Aust J Crop Sci 7:1284–1292
Talalay P, Fahey JW (2001) Phytochemicals from cruciferous plants protect against cancer by modulating carcinogen metabolism. Am Soc Nutr Sci 23:3027–3033
Tariq M, Dawar S, Mehdi FS (2007) Antagonistic activity of bacterial inoculum multiplied on Rhizophora mucronata Lamk., in the control of root infecting fungi on mash bean and okra. Pak J Bot 39:2159–2165
Terouchi N, Syono K (1990) Rhizobium attachment and curing in asparagus, rice and oat plants. Plant Cell Physiol 31:119–127
Tindall HD (1983) Vegetables in the tropics, 1st edn. Macmillan Press, London, UK, p 533
Tortora ML, Díaz-Ricci JC, Pedraza RO (2011) Azospirillum brasilense siderophores with antifungal activity against Colletotrichum acutatum. Arch Microbiol 193:275–286
Trabelsi D, Ammar HB, Mengoni A, Mhamdi R (2012) Appraisal of the crop-rotation effect of rhizobial inoculation on potato cropping systems in relation to soil bacterial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 54:1–6
Verma TS, Thakur PC, Ajeet S (1997) Effect of biofertilizers on vegetable and seed yield of cabbage. Veg Sci 24:1–3
Verma SK, Asati BS, Tamrakar SK et al (2011) Effect of organic components on growth, yield and economic returns in potato. Potato J 38:51–55
Vikhe PS (2014) Azotobacter species as a natural plant hormone synthesizer. Res J Recent Sci 3:59–63
Wiehe W, Höflich G (1995) Survival of plant growth promoting rhizosphere bacteria in the rhizosphere of different crops and migration to non-inoculated plants under field conditions in north-East Germany. Microbiol Res 150:201–206
Wojciechowska R, Rozek S, Rydz A (2005) Broccoli yield and its quality in spring growing cycle as dependent on nitrogen fertilization. Folia Hortic 17:141–152
Woldetsadik K, Gertsson U, Ascard J (2003) Response of shallots to mulching and nitrogen fertilization. Hortic Sci 38:217–221
Work P, Carew J (1955) Vegetable production and marketing, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, p 537
Yadav BD, Khandelwal RB, Sharma YK (2004) Use of bio-fertilizer (Azospirillum) in onion. Haryana J Hortic Sci 33:281–283
Yaso IA, Abdel-Razzak HS, Wahb-Allah MA (2007) Influence of biofertilizer and mineral nitrogen on onion growth, yield and quality under calcareous soil conditions. J Agric Environ Sci 6:245–264
Yeptho KA, Singh AK, Kanaujia SP et al (2012) Quality production of Kharif onion (Allium cepa) in response to biofertilizers inoculated organic manures. Indian J Agric Sci 82:236–240
Yildirim E, Karlidag H, Turan M et al (2011) Growth, nutrient uptake and yield promotion of broccoli by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria with manure. Hortic Sci 46:932–936
Yu X, Liu X, Zhu T, Liu G, Mao C (2012) Co-inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing and nitrogen-fixing bacteria on solubilization of rock phosphate and their effect on growth promotion and nutrient uptake by walnut. Eur J Soil Biol 50:112–117
Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Azam M et al (1997) Effect of an auxin precursor tryptophan and Azotobacter inoculation on yield and chemical composition of potato under fertilized conditions. J Plant Nutr 20:745–752
Zaidi A, Ahmad E, Khan MS, Saif S, Rizvi A (2015) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable production of vegetables: current perspective. Sci Hortic 193:231–239
Zakharova E, Shcherbakov A, Brudnik V, Skripko N, Bulkhin N, Ignatov V (1999) Biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid in Azospirillum brasilense. Insights from quantum chemistry. Eur J Biochem 259:572–576
Zenia M, Halina B (2008) Content of microelements in eggplant fruits depending on nitrogen fertilization and plant training method. J Elementol 13:269–274
Ziaf K, Latif U, Amjad M et al (2016) Combined use of microbial and synthetic amendments can improve radish (Raphanus sativus) yield. J Environ Agric Sci 6:10–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zaidi, A., Khan, M.S., Saif, S., Rizvi, A., Ahmed, B., Shahid, M. (2017). Role of Nitrogen-Fixing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Sustainable Production of Vegetables: Current Perspective. In: Zaidi, A., Khan, M. (eds) Microbial Strategies for Vegetable Production. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54401-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54401-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54400-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54401-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)