Abstract
Since the initial introduction of the surgical robotic system, the development of transoral robotic surgery and robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy techniques has further provided potentials in extending the robotic applications to other neck surgeries. Based on earlier reports in the literature and our surgical experiences, this chapter will illustrate in detail various robotic head and neck surgeries via retroauricular (RA) approach. From the universal application of the RA approach together with the robotic surgical system, it is expected that the paradigm shift from the transcervical incision to the RA incision in neck surgery will open a new era of head and neck surgery.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
12.1 Introduction
Conventional surgeries for various surgically treatable neck tumors adopted the transcervical approach to “open up” the surgical field which were sometimes unfavorable for the patient since the resulting scars were perceived disfiguring and the surgeries also caused various postoperative morbidities. The neck is the most easily recognized and exposed area, and the psychosocial impact may be even more displeasing if a large incisional scar has been created due to neck dissection for head and neck cancer with cervical metastasis. Furthermore, conventional transcervical approach-based surgeries often require large amount of normal tissue dissection just for the purpose of surgical access which could lead to prolonged postoperative recovery and various degrees of functional deterioration.
Consequently in order to reduce the extent of surgical trauma and minimize these surgery-related morbidities, numerous surgical approaches from a distant port have been developed. These so-called remote-access surgeries were founded upon the technological advances of endoscopy and surgical robotics. Based on the early attempts of robotic facelift thyroidectomies by Terris et al. [1,2,3,4,5] and the authors’ extensive surgical experience on former endoscopic and robotic gasless transaxillary thyroidectomy [6, 7], we have extrapolated the application of the RA approach to nearly all aspects of head and neck surgery with the aid of the robotic system (Da Vinci Si Robotic System; Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The authors have seen the promising role of RA approach from its versatile applications.
12.2 Fundamental Concept
The modified facelift (MFL) incision when performing conventional parotidectomy forms the basis for RA incision. The only difference between the MFL and RA incision is the existence of the preauricular limb (Fig. 12.1). Most of the time this robotic procedure can be conducted with the RA incision; however, if there is a necessity for extended access or if a parotidectomy is simultaneously performed at the same side, the MFL incision can be made. Since the surgical access port is remotely placed, common procedures of working space creation and pre-robotic gross dissection are universally applied to all RA robotic neck surgeries.
12.2.1 Universal Surgical Sequence
First, a RA incision is made and an appropriate working space is established (Figs. 12.2 and 12.3).
Next, a self-retaining retractor (L & C Bio, Seongnam-si, Korea) is placed to maintain the working space and then certain surgical steps of gross dissection under the naked eye are conducted beforehand, to move on to the robotic dissection. Recently, this procedure can also be done at the surgeon’s robotic console with the help of the upgraded da Vinci Xi system, since an extra robotic instrumental arm can be inserted through the RA port (Fig. 12.4).
12.3 Surgical Technique
12.3.1 Robotic Surgery of Benign Neck Mass
Almost all cases of benign neck mass can be competently removed by the RA approach. Here, three commonly performed surgical procedures are addressed in detail.
12.3.1.1 Robot-Assisted Sistrunk’s Operation (Fig. 12.5)
Following the docking of the robotic arms, the midline of the neck is recognized by dividing the fibroadipose tissue at the anterior neck using a 5 mm Maryland forceps and a 5 mm spatula monopolar cautery (Figs. 12.6 and 12.7).
Further mobilization of the contralateral side of the hyoid bone is done and resected also with the bone cutter. The thyroglossal duct should be traced further beyond the hyoid bone, and eventually the main mass together with the resected hyoid bone is removed en bloc through the RA port.
12.3.1.2 Robot-Assisted Neurogenic Tumor Excision
The subplatysmal skin flap is elevated, and sufficient area of working space is created before the robotic docking. Generally, for the removal of neurogenic tumors a Metzenbaum scissors (PK™ Dissecting Forceps) is used for the enucleation of the tumor (Fig. 12.8).
12.3.1.3 Robot-Assisted Submandibular Gland Excision
After creating a sufficient area of working space, a self-retaining retractor is placed to maintain the height for robotic arms docking (Figs. 12.9 and 12.10).
Further subcapsular dissection is performed around the superior border of the SMG to proceed the dissection to the anterior portion of the gland (Fig. 12.11).
Care must be taken not to violate the tumor itself during the dissection. Interaction of the robotic surgeon with the patient-side assistant surgeon is important. The traction and countertraction manipulation should be well coordinated by appropriate handling of the Yankauer suction tip or endoscopic dissector held by the assistant. This surgical technique of robot-assisted submandibular gland resection is considered a key, fundamental procedure for robot-assisted neck dissection (RAND), so it is recommended for a beginning surgeon to experience a sufficient number of these procedures before attempting RAND.
12.3.2 Robot-Assisted Neck Dissection
The procedure of RAND can be equally applied to both cN0 or cN+ necks in head and neck cancer. For the RAND in cN+ necks, main vital neurovascular anatomical structures such as spinal accessory nerve, internal jugular vein, and sternocleidomastoid muscle must be preserved considering that the main purpose of RAND is to minimize postoperative morbidities. Therefore, in any cases where this is not feasible, the authors recommend conventional open neck dissection rather than RAND. Careful, prudent selection of patients for therapeutic RAND must therefore be carried out beforehand, with close examinations of preoperative imagings.
Here, the RAND procedure is specified in detail with emphasis on two distinct operations: selective neck dissection (levels I–III) and comprehensive neck dissection (levels I–V). Other types of neck dissection can be performed by selective modifications of these two procedures.
12.3.2.1 Selective Neck Dissection (Levels I–III)
12.3.2.1.1 Pre-robotic Procedure
Certain amount of dissection is conducted under naked eye beforehand, prior to robotic dissection. Generally, the dissection is followed according to the conventional neck dissection procedure (Figs. 12.12, 12.13, and 12.14).
12.3.2.1.2 Robotic Dissection (Figs. 12.15, 12.16, 12.17, and 12.18)
Next the direction of dissection is turned to levels II and III, around the carotid sheath. The inferior extent of the dissection is the omohyoid muscle, and the medial extent is the midline strap muscles. The specimen is then removed en bloc.
12.3.2.2 Modified Radical Neck Dissection (Levels I–V or II–V)
12.3.2.2.1 Pre-robotic Procedure
The RA incision and skin-subplatysmal flap is elevated similarly; however, when creating the working space, the flap should be sufficiently elevated beyond the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle to meet the trapezius muscle so that levels IV and V are properly addressed. When level I is omitted in the procedure, the skin flap does not have to be as high up as to the inferior margin of the mandible. It would only increase the chance of direct/indirect marginal mandibular nerve injury.
After placing the self-retaining retractor, gross dissection is initiated at the appropriate level according to the type of neck dissection (levels I–V or II–V)
For the comprehensive dissection of level I–V, the dissection starts at level Ib by identifying the marginal branch of facial nerve as described previously for the selective neck dissection of levels I–III. When conducting the neck dissection of levels II–V, the dissection is commenced at level II with identification of the inferior border of the submandibular gland.
Dividing the fascia at the inferior border of submandibular gland, the dissection is proceeded posteriorly to release the parotid tail. Likewise, the posterior belly of digastric muscle is identified below the submandibular gland, and it is followed posteriorly to locate the internal jugular vein. Next, the spinal accessory nerve is identified, and the fascia at the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle is opened up. The dissection is continued medially visualizing the carotid sheath and as far inferior as possible to level IV (Figs. 12.19 and 12.20).
12.3.2.2.2 Robotic Dissection (Figs. 12.21, 12.22, 12.23, and 12.24)
To begin levels IV and V dissection, the robotic arms should be repositioned so that the axis is in a cephalocaudal direction, facing toward the clavicle. The previously dissected tissue of level Va is grasped with the robot, and dissection is conducted superiorly to inferiorly. As the level of dissection reaches level Vb, the specimen is retracted medially, and the dissection continues to meet the omohyoid muscle which is consequently cut.
After completion of the dissection, the final neck specimen is delivered through the RA port. The postsurgical bed is irrigated and bleeding control done, before placing a closed suction drain. The surgical wound is then sutured with simple interrupted sutures.
12.4 Surgical Considerations
Generally, the Harmonic curved shears-mounted robotic arm is placed at the surgeon’s dominant hand and the Maryland forceps at the nondominant hand. In terms of difficulty, there is no significant difference between a right-sided and a left-sided surgery; however, the dominant-sided surgery may be more comfortable to perform for the robotic surgeon.
12.5 Potential Postoperative Complications
Possible complications of this robotic RA surgery include:
-
Nerve injury
-
Lingual nerve injury
-
Hypoglossal nerve injury
-
Marginal mandibular branch of facial nerve injury (mouth corner deviation)
-
Vagus nerve injury (vocal cord palsy)
-
Sympathetic nerve injury (Horner’s syndrome)
-
Spinal accessory nerve injury (spinal accessory nerve syndrome)
-
Phrenic nerve injury
-
-
Bleeding/hematoma
-
Seroma
-
Chyle leakage (lymphatic/thoracic duct injury)
-
Wound infection, dehiscence
-
Ischemia or necrosis of skin flap
The potential complications are similar to those from a conventional open neck operation. Mouth corner deviation may result from various degree of injury of the marginal branch of the facial nerve. The surgeon should pay special attention when dissecting around level I to avoid direct/indirect injury to the facial nerve. Main causes of indirect injury to the marginal mandibular nerve are thermal energy generated by surgical instruments and traction made by external retractors. Most indirect injuries of the facial nerve cause temporary mouth corner deviation which generally resolves within 2–3 months after the operation.
The surgical field from the RA port is relatively narrow, so there is a higher chance of major neurovascular structure injuries. A comprehensive knowledge and familiarizing the local surgical anatomy and a sufficient amount of surgical experience are prerequisites to minimize such complications.
Occasionally skin problems such as ischemic change or necrosis may occur at the RA skin flap. These consequences can be avoided by limiting the upper end of the flap to the level of the external auditory meatus and avoiding an acute angle of the skin curvature when designing the incision. Hair loss can occur along the skin incision within the hairline, but this can be minimized by beveling the incision at this portion.
12.6 Further Applications
Robot-assisted neck surgery via RA approach can be applied virtually to all surgeries for lesions located in the neck. Other benign neck mass such as parapharyngeal tumor, branchial cleft cyst, and lipoma can be removed, and thyroidectomy can also be performed via RA approach, with the aid of the robotic system. Hypopharyngeal tumors can also be removed robotically by the RA approach after exposing the tumor via lateral pharyngotomy. Moreover, free flap reconstruction is feasible with the robot inserted from the RA port.
It is expected that this surgical technique will continuously evolve even more with the technological refinements regarding the robotic system. Already, the introduction of the upgraded da Vinci Xi system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) has enabled inserting an extra robotic instrumental arm through the RA port, thereby minimizing the role of the assistant surgeon. Furthermore, unlike the former procedure, the robotic dissection can be now be conducted right after the working space creation, since an extra robotic arm will provide more comfortable dissection and sustained retraction. Most recently, there are expectations that there will emerge a multi-instrument-mounted, “single-port” robotic system which will take the robotic neck surgery to the next level. Not only would the RA robotic surgery be easier to learn and practice, but the surgical skill itself could be further refined by placing a smaller incision.
References
Singer MC, Seybt MW, Terris DJ. Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: I. Preclinical simulation and morphometric assessment. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1631–5.
Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW. Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II. Clinical feasibility and safety. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1636–41.
Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW. Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: patient selection and technical considerations. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Technol. 2011;21:237–42.
Terris DJ, Singer MC. Qualitative and quantitative differences between 2 robotic thyroidectomy techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147:20–5.
Terris DJ, Singer MC. Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: facilitating remote access surgery. Head Neck. 2012;34:746–7.
Koh YW, Park JH, Kim JW, et al. Endoscopic hemithyroidectomy with prophylactic ipsilateral central neck dissection via an unilateral axillo-breast approach without gas insufflation for unilateral micropapillary thyroid carcinoma: preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:188–97.
Koh YW, Kim JW, Lee SW, Choi EC. Endoscopic thyroidectomy via a unilateral axillo-breast approach without gas insufflation for unilateral benign thyroid lesions. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2053–60.
Koh YW, Choi EC. Robotic approaches to the neck. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2014;47:433–54.
Kim CH, Byeon HK, Shin YS, et al. Robot-assisted Sistrunk operation via a retroauricular approach for thyroglossal duct cyst. Head Neck. 2014;36:456–8.
Koh YW, Chung WY, Hong HJ, et al. Robot-assisted selective neck dissection via modified face-lift approach for early oral tongue cancer: a video demonstration. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1334–5.
Kim CH, Chang JW, Choi EC, et al. Robotically assisted selective neck dissection in parotid gland cancer: preliminary report. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:646–50.
Shin YS, Choi EC, Kim CH, et al. Robot-assisted selective neck dissection combined with facelift parotidectomy in parotid cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36:592–5.
Kim CH, Koh YW, Kim D, et al. Robotic-assisted neck dissection in submandibular gland cancer: preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:1450–7.
Lee HS, Kim WS, Hong HJ, et al. Robot-assisted supraomohyoid neck dissection via a modified face-lift or retroauricular approach in early-stage cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a comparative study with conventional technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3871–8.
Kim WS, Byeon HK, Park YM, et al. Therapeutic robot-assisted neck dissection via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach in head and neck cancer: a comparative study with conventional transcervical neck dissection. Head Neck. 2015;37:249–54.
Park YM, Lee WJ, Yun IS, et al. Free flap reconstruction after robot-assisted neck dissection via a modified face-lift or retroauricular approach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:891–8.
Byeon HK, Holsinger FC, Tufano RP, Chung HJ, Kim WS, Koh YW, Choi EC. Robotic total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection via unilateral retroauricular approach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3872–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Byeon, H.K., Koh, Y.W. (2017). Robot-Assisted Neck Surgery. In: Gil, Z., Amit, M., Kupferman, M. (eds) Atlas of Head and Neck Robotic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49578-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49578-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49576-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49578-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)