Abstract
In order to describe continuous optimization tasks for the efficient design of materials and production processes from a reasonable data sample size, we propose an integrated surrogate modeling approach. We show the proof of concept by application to a draw bending simulation that describes the relation between the process parameters and the spring-back as the process result. The introduced concept can also be directly applied to experimental data while taking into account the process noise as uncertainty (e.g. for process control). The integrated approach combines three components: Design of Experiments, surrogate process modeling (based on function approximation by regression, e.g. Artificial Neural Networks) and optimization of process or material parameters. The identified parameters enable to rapidly find the optimal operating conditions for real experiments or to constrain them for further detailed simulation studies. Future work involves applications to more complex experiments or simulations to efficiently determine the optimal process or material parameters by sparse and adaptive data samples.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Senn, N. Link, and P. Gumbsch. “Optimal Process Control through Feature-Based State Tracking Along Process Chains”. Second World Congress on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (2013).
M. Senn et al. “Reducing the Computational Effort of Optimal Process Controllers for Continuous State Spaces by Using Incremental Learning and Post-Decision State Formulations”. Journal of Process Control, 24 (3), (2014), 133–143.
H. A. Dror and D. M. Steinberg. “Sequential Experimental Designs for Generalized Linear Models”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103 (481), (2008), 288–298.
K. Crombecq et al. “A Novel Sequential Design Strategy for Global Surrogate Modeling”. Proceedings of the 41th Conference on Winter Simulation (2009).
D. Gorissen et al. “A Surrogate Modeling and Adaptive Sampling Toolbox for Computer Based Design”. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11 (1), (2010), 2051–2055.
A. C. Atkinson, A. N. Donev, and R. D. Tobias. Optimum experimental designs, with SAS (Oxford University Press, 2007).
A. Forrester, A. Sobester, and A. Keane. Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide (Wiley, 2008).
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, 2009).
M. T. Hagan, H. B. Demuth, and M. H. Beale. Neural Network Design (Campus Publication Service, 2002).
K. M. Wurster et al. “Procedure for Automated Virtual Optimization of Variable Blank Holder Force Distributions for Deep-Drawing Processes with LS-Dyna and optiSLang”. Weimarer Optimierungs- und Stochastiktage (2011).
D. Telen et al. “Optimal Experiment Design for Nonlinear Dynamic (Bio)chemical Systems Using Sequential Semidefinite Programming”. AIChE Journal, 60 (5), (2014), 1728–1739.
L. Taylor et al. “Numerical simulations of sheet-metal forming”. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 50 (1–4), (1995), 168–179.
J. R. Koza. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection (MIT Press, 1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Senn, M. (2015). An Integrated Surrogate Modeling Approach for Materials and Process Design. In: Poole, W., et al. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME 2015). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48170-8_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48170-8_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48612-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48170-8
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)