Abstract
Soil-bound xenobiotic compounds resulting from anthropogenic activities are known to be toxic, persistent and recalcitrant. Molecular techniques such as DNA fingerprinting, metagenomics, metaproteomics, metatranscriptomics and proteogenomics offer new insights into phylogenetic and functional diversity of soil microbial assemblages. Metagenomics deals with genetic material directly recovered from environmental samples. Recent advances in molecular techniques have opened up new perspectives in pollution abatement when compared with traditional molecular techniques dependent on isolation of pure cultures. This chapter summarizes basic concepts of metagenomics and various approaches known to facilitate metagenomic screening as well as challenges that hamper the soil xenobiotic metagenomic analysis.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
7.1 Introduction
Soil is a complex dynamic biological system where it is difficult to link specific taxa to metabolic processes (Burns et al. 2013). Soil metagenomics, which comprises isolation of soil DNA and the production and screening of clone libraries, can provide a cultivation-independent assessment of the largely untapped genetic reservoir of soil microbial communities (Daniel 2005). The term ‘metagenome’ was proposed by Handelsman et al. (1998) to describe the genomes of the total microbiota found in nature that can be understood as the whole collection of genomic information of all microorganisms in a given environment (Di Bella et al. 2013). The increasing availability of genes, genomes and metagenomes as well as the growing understanding of their functionalities are supported by considerations of microbial physiology, biochemistry, genetic regulation and engineering in pure strains or defined communities for implementation in bioremediation (Agathos and Boon 2015).
Metagenomics is a rapidly growing area of genome sciences that seeks to characterize the composition of microbial communities , their operations and their dynamically co-evolving relationships with the habitats even in unculturable environments (Franzosa et al. 2015; Taupp et al. 2011; Yong and Zhong 2010; Turnbaugh and Gordon 2008). Metagenomics involves sequencing the total DNA extracted from environmental samples (Thomas et al. 2015). Metagenomics offers the possibility to retrieve unknown sequences or functions from the environment, in contrast to methods relying on PCR amplification which are based on prior knowledge of gene sequences (Stenuit et al. 2008).
The primary objective of any metagenome sequencing project is the total characterization of a community, taxonomic breakdown and relative abundance of the various species and genic composition of each member of the community including number, functional capacity and intra-species/intra-population heterogeneity of the genes (Scholz et al. 2012). Metagenomics can be employed to identify the functional potential and the taxonomic identity of all organisms in an environmental sample, without leaving any information regarding the active members of the microbial community involved (El Amrani et al. 2015). In such a case, metagenomic techniques such as single isotope probing can be applicable for the identification of active members of the microbial community and associated genes essential for biodegradative processes (Uhlik et al. 2013).
Functional metagenomics includes screening of environmental-DNA libraries for enzymatic activities or metabolite synthesis (Tannieres et al. 2013). The application of metagenomics might aid in the isolation of novel catabolic pathways for degradation of xenobiotic compounds, indicating the functional genetic capacity for contaminant degradation and providing molecular tools useful for identification of the microbial taxa encoding the biodegradative gene (Kakirde et al. 2010). Metagenomic approaches enable to identify several novel genes encoding cellulolytic, pectinolytic, proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes and many new enzymes for screening and identification of unexplored microbial consortia involved in soil xenobiotic degradation (Bashir et al. 2014).
Xenobiotics are foreign compounds to living organisms whose molecules are not easily recognized by existing degradative enzymes and tend to accumulate in soil and water. Xenobiotics include polyaromatic, chlorinated and nitroaromatic compounds, known to be toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic for living organisms (Eyers et al. 2004). The toxicity of these compounds for the environment and for biota results from their resistance to natural degradation owing to their structural complexity (Ufarte et al. 2015). During microbial degradation of xenobiotics, all changes in the chemical structure are due to the action of enzymes. These enzymes possess a broad range of specificity to accommodate several molecules of similar structure. If such enzymes are identified and isolated, they can be engineered by directed evolution to improve their efficiency with respect to a particular compound (Theerachat et al. 2012).
It is estimated that soil metagenome accommodates approximately 6000–10,000 Escherichia coli genomes in undisturbed organic soils and 350–1500 genomes in disturbed of which only 5 % has been cultured and studied in the laboratory (Desai and Madamwar 2007). Metagenomic analyses have enabled researchers to explore the previously uncultivable microorganisms and exploit their genetic potential in the bioremediation of contaminated soil (Martin et al. 2006; Malik et al. 2008; Simon and Daniel 2011). The metagenomic DNA of polluted environments is a potential genetic resource from which phylogenetic affiliation of uncultured bacterial species could be determined and their genetic potential can be tapped by identifying novel biocatalyst, xenobiotic and metal-detoxifying genes with utility in bioremediation processes (Meier et al. 2015, 2016; Desai and Madamwar 2007). Predictive elative metabolic turnover (PRMT ) converts metagenomic sequence data into relative metrics for the consumption or production of specific metabolites (Larsen et al. 2011).
Metagenomics lacks the tools to determine whether sufficient coverage is available for the type of analysis planned or whether one can interpret data of a certain depth for a community of a given complexity. Therefore, the standard low coverage in metagenomic studies generates a dataset that reflects a random subsampling of the genomic content of the individual community members (Desai et al. 2012).
7.2 Approaches to Metagenomics
There are different approaches to metagenomics: (1) shotgun metagenomics where all DNA is sheared and sequenced and functions and taxonomy are derived from homology search in databases, (2) activity-driven studies that are designed to search for specific microbial functions, (3) sequence-driven studies that link genome information with phylogenetic or functional marker genes of interest and (4) direct determination of the whole collection of genes within an environmental sample without constructing a metagenomic library (Suenaga 2012; Harismendy et al. 2009; Shendure and Ji 2008; Brulc et al. 2009). The basic steps involved in metagenomics of soil-bound xenobiotic compounds has been analysed by means of schematic process workflow (Fig. 7.1).
The four metagenomic approaches described above based on their random and directed sequencing strategies can be characterized as unselective (shotgun analysis and next-generation sequencing) and targeted (activity-driven and sequence-driven studies) metagenomics, respectively. Unselective metagenomics is a simple and cost-effective DNA sequencing option (Chen and Pachter 2005). The number of metagenomic projects has exploded in recent years, and hundreds of environmental samples have been unravelled by shotgun sequencing (Ivanova et al. 2010). Whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing and amplicon sequencing have been applied to study diverse microbiomes, ranging from natural environments to the built environment and the human body (Tyson et al. 2004). In addition to enrichment culture approaches, isolated environmental DNA can be subjected to whole genome amplification, that is, multiple displacement amplification (MDA) to provide sufficient genetic substrate for library production (Taupp et al. 2011).
A shotgun metagenomic approach relies on sequencing of total DNA extracted from a given sample, without prior cloning into a vector (Jansson 2015). The application of this approach involves the design of PCR primers or hybridization probes for the target genes that are derived from conserved regions of already known protein families, which a priori limits the chances for obtaining fundamentally new proteins (Ferrer et al. 2009). The activity-based approach involves construction of small to large insert expression libraries, especially those made in lambda phage, cosmid or copy-control fosmid vectors, which are further implemented for a direct activity screening (Lorenz and Eck 2005). Three different function-driven approaches have been used to recover novel biomolecules: phenotypical detection of the desired activity heterologous complementation of host strains or mutants and induced gene expression (Simon and Daniel 2011). The major limitation of this approach to systems microbiology is that metagenomic libraries have a size limit. After constructing a library, a critical step is to screen for clones that contain target genes among a large number of clones. Here, dozens of thousands of clones may be analysed in a single screen. Certainly, owing to the limitation of efficient expression of the metagenome-derived genes in the selected host, the numbers of positive clones will not be high. Furthermore, in activity-based screening, it is necessary to develop specialized screening systems to detect the activity of the products of the gene of interest (Ferrer et al. 2009). Targeted metagenomic studies that combine metagenomic library screening and subsequent sequencing analysis appear to be a more effective means to understand the content and composition of genes for key ecological processes in microbial communities (Suenaga 2012).
7.3 Metagenomics of Xenobiotics
7.3.1 PAHs
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs ) are ubiquitous, persistent and toxic organic compounds in the environment (Cao et al. 2015; Srujana and Khan 2012). The advent of metagenomic approaches has revealed a higher degree of diversity in the degradation pathways and enzymes (Suenaga et al. 2007; Brennerova et al. 2009). Using a function-driven metagenomic approach, Sierra-Garcia et al. (2014) reported metagenomic fragments comprising of genes belonging to different pathways, showing novel gene arrangements . These results reinforce the potential of the metagenomic approach for the identification and elucidation of new genes and pathways in poorly studied environments and contribute to a broader perspective on the hydrocarbon.
Ring-hydroxylating dioxygenases/oxygenases (RHDs ) play a crucial role in the biodegradation of a range of aromatic hydrocarbons found on polluted sites, including PAHs (Chemerys et al. 2014; Peng et al. 2010). RHDs are multicomponent metalloenzymes, which catalyse the first step in the bacterial degradation of various aromatic hydrocarbons (Jouanneau et al. 2011). Hydroxylation of an aromatic ring is the essential catalytic reaction for aromatic-ring degradation by bacteria in nature. Mostly, the hydroxylation is catalysed by an oxygenase family, Rieske oxygenase (RO). ROs catalyse a broad range of aromatic-ring compounds including mono- and polycyclic aromatic and hetero-aromatic compounds that are composed of terminal oxygenase and electron transfer components. The terminal oxygenase component has a Rieske cluster as a redox component that receives electrons from the electron transfer components and mononuclear iron as a catalytic site for dioxygen activation (Inoue and Nojiri 2014). The nah genes for PAH catabolism of Pseudomonas strains are highly homologous and usually organized in two operons: the upper nah1, which control initial oxidation of naphthalene and subsequent degradation to salicylate, and the nah2 operon for salicylate oxidation. However, the location of both operons and their relative expression may vary. New variants of salicylate hydroxylase genes were found. Also isofunctional genes for salicylate oxidation could be often detected within one Pseudomonas strain. The unique genetic organization is described for P. putida AK5 which degrades PAH via salicylate and gentisate, combining ‘classical’ nah1 operon and newly described sgp-operon (Boronin et al. 2010).
In addition to the enzyme-encoding genes involved in aromatic compound degradation, metagenomic libraries were screened earlier for regulatory elements that sense aromatic compounds (Suenaga et al. 2009). The implementation of stable-isotope probing (SIP ) to track PAH degraders led to the detection of novel bacteria with remarkable biodegradation potential. SIP approaches also exposed the affiliation of uncultured microorganisms with PAH-degrading bacteria identified in contaminated soils (Chemerys et al. 2014; Uhlik et al. 2012; Singleton et al. 2005). Fluorescence-based reporter assay system termed as substrate-induced gene expression (SIGEX ) can be used for identification of transcriptional regulators that sense benzoate and naphthalene (Uchiyama and Miyazaki 2013).
Using a metagenomic approach, microbial communities were monitored in Alert biopiles over time to identify microorganisms and functional genes linked to the high hydrocarbon degradation rates in soils undergoing treatment using an unbiased, culture and PCR-independent method . Pseudomonas sp. expressing hydrocarbon-degrading genes were most abundant in diesel-contaminated Canadian High Arctic soils . After sequencing the metagenome of soil biopiles through a time course, the results were compared with uncontaminated soil and then quantified the expression and the abundance of key functional genes for abundant microorganisms identified in the metagenomic datasets (Yergeau et al. 2012). A culture-independent approach to assess the microbial aerobic catabolome for PAH degradation was used to study the microbial community of a PAH-contaminated soil subjected to 10 years of in situ bioremediation, basing on Illumina-based deep sequencing of amplicons targeting the V5–V6 region of 16S rRNA gene. A metagenomic library was prepared in pCCFos and 425,000 clones subjected to activity-based screening for key catabolic ring-cleavage activities using 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl as a substrate. Since most of the genes encoding extradiol ring-cleavage enzymes on 672 fosmids could not be identified using primers based on currently available sequence information, 200 fosmid inserts were sequenced using the Illumina technology. Manually curated databases for catabolic key gene families involved in degradation of aromatics were developed named as AromaDeg to overcome the misannotations in databases. Sequence information of the fosmid inserts revealed not only the presence of novel extradiol dioxygenase genes but also additional key genes of aromatic metabolic pathways only distantly related to previously described variants (Duarte 2014).
An et al. (2013) reported that 160 microbial community compositions were compared in ten hydrocarbon resource environments (HREs) and sequenced 12 metagenomes to characterize their metabolic potential. In addition to common anaerobic communities, cores from oil sands and coal beds had unexpectedly high proportions of aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria. Likewise, most metagenomes had high proportions of genes for enzymes involved in aerobic hydrocarbon metabolism. Time-course analysis of microbial communities using a combination of metagenomics with metatranscriptomics and metaproteomics and stable-isotope probing technique will greatly contribute to the evaluation of the ecological functions of microbial genes at the community level (Muller et al. 2014; Kato et al. 2015). Loviso et al. (2015) investigated the potential to degrade PAHs of yet-to-be-cultured bacterial populations from chronically polluted intertidal sediments. They identified uncultured micro-organism having the potential to degrade aromatic hydrocarbons with various chemical structures thereby providing valuable information for the design of environmental molecular diagnostic tools for biotechnological application of RHO enzymes. When spatial and temporal variations of microbial communities and reconstructed metagenomes along the rice rhizosphere gradient during PAHs degradation were investigated, distance from root surface and PAH concentrations were found to affect the microbial communities and metagenomes in rice rhizosphere. The abundance of dioxygenase genes relating to PAH degradation in metagenomes mirrored the PAH degradation potential in rice rhizosphere (Ma et al. 2015).
7.3.2 Organochlorinated Compounds
Biphenyl dioxygenase (BphA) is a key enzyme in the aerobic catabolism of PCBs which carries out the initial attack on the inert aromatic nucleus. It belongs to class II of aryl-hydroxylating dioxygenases (ARHDOs) that typically hydroxylate substituted benzenes, like toluenes and biphenyls. This enzyme represents a catabolic bottleneck, as its substrate range is typically narrower than that of subsequent pathway enzymes. Metagenomic approaches can be applied to demonstrate the feasibility of the applied approach to functionally characterize dioxygenase activities of soil metagenomes via amplification of incomplete genes (Standfuß-Gabisch et al. 2012).
\( \gamma \)-Hexachlorocyclohexane also known as lindane (γ-HCH/γ-BHC) is a xenobiotic halogenated insecticide that was previously used worldwide, and this compound still remains in the environment and causes serious environmental concern (Vijgen et al. 2011). Activity-based screening techniques were applied to clone a gene-encoding γHCH dehydrochlorinase with its flanking regions from a cosmid-based library of DNA that was extracted from a γHCH-added suspension of HCH-contaminated soil. A total of 11 cosmid clones showing the γHCH dehydrochlorinase activity were obtained through the screenings. All the clones had a linA gene identical to known one, but its flanking regions showed some structural variations with known ones, suggesting high likelihood of genetic divergence in the linA flanking regions (Ito et al. 2012).
7.3.3 Nitroaromatics
Nitroaromatic compounds such as nitrobenzene or nitrotoluene are widely used as pesticides, dyes, polymers or explosives and are considered as priority pollutants (Kulkarni and Chaudhari 2007). The two main explosives, 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT ) and hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine [Royal Demolition Explosive (RDX)], are major nitroaromatic environmental pollutants and present distinct problems for bioremediation (Rylott et al. 2011). Rational design of enzymatic activity has been used to improve the degradation of nitroaromatic compounds. Nitrobenzene 1,2-dioxygenase catalyses the conversion of nitrobenzene to catechol and nitrite. The residues near the active site of this enzyme were modified for controlling substrate specificity. The substitution of amino acid at the position 293 (F293Q) expanded substrate specificity, resulting in 2.5-fold faster oxidization rate against 2,6-dinitrotoluene (Singh et al. 2008). Lee et al. (2005) reported that the residues of 2,6-dinitrotoluene near active sites chosen for site-directed mutagenesis and the replacement at the position 258 significantly changed the enantiospecificity.
Biodegradation of para-nitrophenol (PNP ) proceeds via two distinct pathways in Burkholderia sp. strain SJ98, having 1,2,3-benzenetriol (BT) and hydroquinone (HQ) as their respective terminal aromatic intermediates. A ~41 kb fragment from the genomic library of Burkholderia sp. strain SJ98 has been sequenced and analysed. This DNA fragment was found to harbour all the lower pathway genes. Later the whole genome of strain SJ98 was sequenced and annotated and found two ORFs (viz. pnpA and pnpB) showing maximum identity at amino acid level with p-nitrophenol 4-monooxygenase (PnpM) and p-benzoquinone reductase. This is the first report for studying the genes for PNP degradation in strain SJ98 which are found to be arranged differentially in the form of non-contiguous gene clusters (Vikram et al. 2013).
7.4 Challenges and Future Prospects
Although metagenomics is revealing new information about phylogenetic and functional genes in some soils, it is not possible to adopt the information available to date to all soils (Jansson 2015). Owing to the complexity and heterogeneity of the biotic and abiotic components of soil ecosystems, the construction and screening of soil-based libraries is difficult and challenging (Daniel 2005). Soil metagenomics is susceptible to limitations that are common to all molecular techniques. Soil DNA extraction procedures are not fully efficient, where adsorption of cells and the adherence of DNA onto soil components cause losses of genetic information, and the DNA exploitation techniques currently in use provide access mainly to populations that dominate in soil (Lombard et al. 2011). Metagenomics provides little information on quantitative physiological characteristics such as maximum specific growth rate, saturation constant, pH, temperature for growth, susceptibility to predation and the speed of recovery after starvation. It is also difficult to draw meaningful information from correlations between the physicochemical characteristics of soil and metagenomic data (Prosser 2015).
Data analysis is the key limiting factor in metagenomic studies as increased data volumes are posing significant challenges to the existing analysis tools and indeed to the community providing analysis systems. This growth in dataset size, along with computational complexity of analysis, has left the metagenomics community in an unsustainable position, in terms of both financial cost and feasibility of analysis itself (Desai et al. 2012). While metagenome sequencing can provide useful estimates of the relative change in abundance of specific genes and taxa between environments or over time, this does not investigate the relative changes in the production or consumption of different metabolites (Larsen et al. 2011). Adapted sampling strategies and the combination of DNA extraction methods can help to recover these minority populations, which are normally masked by the dominant ones. Pyrosequencing and Illumina/Solexa technologies also offers a chance to access the rare biosphere, but is still concerned by the overriding effect of the dominant biota. Methods such as prior separation of particular minority cells via flow cytometry, or separation/fractionation of DNA by G+C % or in a SIP-based approach, will certainly help to tease out specific minority populations (Lombard et al. 2011).
References
Agathos SN, Boon N (2015) Editorial overview: environmental biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 33:5–7
An D, Caffrey SM, Soh J, Agrawa A, Brown D, Budwill K, Dong X, Dunfield PF, Foght J, Gieg LM, Hallam SJ (2013) Metagenomics of hydrocarbon resource environments indicates aerobic taxa and genes to be unexpectedly common. Environ Sci Technol 47(18):10708–10717
Bashir Y, Singh P, Kumar KB (2014) Metagenomics: an application based perspective. Chin J Biotechnol 1–7. doi:10.1155/2014/146030
Boronin AM, Kosheleva IA, Sokolov SL, Izmalkova TY, Sazonova OI (2010) Variability of plasmids and PAH degradation genetic systems of pseudomonas. J Biotechnol 150:45–51
Brennerova MV, Josefiova J, Brenner V, Pieper DH, Junca H (2009) Metagenomics reveals diversity and abundance of meta-cleavage pathways in microbial communities from soil highly contaminated with jet fuel under air-sparging bioremediation. Environ Microbiol 11(9):2216–2227
Brulc JM, Antonopoulos DA, Miller MEB, Wilson MK, Yannarell AC, Dinsdale EA, Edwards RE, Frank ED, Emerson JB, Wacklin P, Coutinho PM (2009) Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(6):1948–1953
Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J, Sinsabaugh RL, Stromberger ME, Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN, Zoppini A (2013) Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol Biochem 58:216–234
Cao J, Lai Q, Yuan J, Shao Z (2015) Genomic and metabolic analysis of fluoranthene degradation pathway in Celeribacter indicus P73T. Sci Rep 5:67–71
Chemerys A, Pelletier E, Cruaud C, Martin F, Violet F, Jouanneau Y (2014) Characterization of novel polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon dioxygenases from the bacterial metagenomic DNA of a contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(21):6591–6600
Chen K, Pachter L (2005) Bioinformatics for whole-genome shotgun sequencing of microbial communities. PLoS Comput Biol 1(2):e24
Daniel R (2005) The metagenomics of soil. Nat Rev Microbiol 3(6):470–478
Desai C, Madamwar D (2007) Extraction of inhibitor-free metagenomic DNA from polluted sediments, compatible with molecular diversity analysis using adsorption and ion-exchange treatments. Bioresour Technol 98(4):761–768
Desai N, Antonopoulos D, Gilbert JA, Glass EM, Meyer F (2012) From genomics to metagenomics. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23(1):72–76
Di Bella JM, Bao Y, Gloor GB, Burton JP, Reid G (2013) High throughput sequencing methods and analysis for microbiome research. J Microbiol Method 95(3):401–414
Duarte M (2014) Functional soil metagenomics: elucidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation potential after 10 years of in situ bioremediation. In: Annual meeting and exhibition 2014, Simb, 20–24 July 2014
El Amrani A, Dumas AS, Wick LY, Yergeau E, Berthomé R (2015) “Omics” insights into PAH degradation toward improved green remediation biotechnologies. Environ Sci Technol 49(19):11281–11291
Eyers L, George I, Schuler L, Stenuit B, Agathos SN, El Fantroussi S (2004) Environmental genomics: exploring the unmined richness of microbes to degrade xenobiotics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66(2):123–130
Ferrer M, Beloqui A, Timmis KN, Golyshin PN (2009) Metagenomics for mining new genetic resources of microbial communities. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 16(1–2):109–123
Franzosa EA, Hsu T, Sirota-Madi A, Shafquat A, Abu-Ali G, Morgan XC, Huttenhower C (2015) Sequencing and beyond: integrating molecular ‘omics’ for microbial community profiling. Nat Rev Microbiol 13(6):360–372
Handelsman J, Rondon MR, Brady SF, Clardy J, Goodman RM (1998) Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chem Biol 5(10):R245–R249
Harismendy O, Ng PC, Strausberg RL, Wang X, Stockwell TB, Beeson KY, Schork NJ, Murray SS, Topol EJ, Levy S, Frazer KA (2009) Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies. Genome Biol 10(3):R32
Inoue K, Nojiri H (2014) Structure and function of aromatic-ring hydroxylating dioxygenase system. In: Biodegradative bacteria. Springer, Tokyo, pp 181–205
Ito M, Ono A, Ohtsubo Y, Tsuda M, Nagata Y (2012) Cloning of γ-hexachlorocyclohexane dehydrochlorinase gene with its flanking regions from soil by activity-based screening techniques. Eur J Soil Biol 52:16–19
Ivanova N, Tringe SG, Liolios K, Liu WT, Morrison N, Hugenholtz P, Kyrpides NC (2010) A call for standardized classification of metagenome projects. Environ Microbiol 12(7):1803–1805
Jansson J (2015) Soil metagenomics. Encyclopedia of metagenomics: environmental metagenomics. Springer, New York, pp. 600–609
Jouanneau Y, Martin F, Krivobok S, Willison JC (2011) Ring-hydroxylating dioxygenases involved in PAH biodegradation: structure, function, biodiversity. Microbial bioremediation of non-metals: current research. Caister Academic, Norflok, pp. 149–175
Kakirde KS, Parsley C, Liles MR (2010) Size does matter: application-driven approaches for soil metagenomics. Soil Biol Biochem 42(11):1911–1923
Kato H, Mori H, Maruyama F, Toyoda A, Oshima K, Endo R, Fuchu G, Miyakoshi M, Dozono A, Ohtsubo Y, Nagata Y (2015) Time-series metagenomic analysis reveals robustness of soil microbiome against chemical disturbance. DNA Res 22(6):413–424
Kulkarni M, Chaudhari A (2007) Microbial remediation of nitro-aromatic compounds: an overview. J Environ Manage 85(2):496–512
Larsen PE, Collart FR, Field D, Meyer F, Keegan KP, Henry CS, McGrath J, Quinn J, Gilbert JA (2011) Predicted relative metabolomic turnover (PRMT): determining metabolic turnover from a coastal marine metagenomic dataset. Microb Inf Exp 1(1):1–11
Lee KS, Parales JV, Friemann R, Parales RE (2005) Active site residues controlling substrate specificity in 2-nitrotoluene dioxygenase from Acidovorax sp. strain JS42. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 32(10):465–473
Lombard N, Prestat E, van Elsas JD, Simonet P (2011) Soil-specific limitations for access and analysis of soil microbial communities by metagenomics. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78(1):31–49
Lorenz P, Eck J (2005) Metagenomics and industrial applications. Nat Rev Microbiol 3(6):510–516
Loviso CL, Lozada M, Guibert LM, Musumeci MA, Sarango CS, Kuin RV, Marcos MS, Dionisi HM (2015) Metagenomics reveals the high polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degradation potential of abundant uncultured bacteria from chronically polluted subantarctic and temperate coastal marine environments. J Appl Microbiol 119(2):411–424
Ma B, Lyu XF, Zha T, Gong J, He Y, Xu JM (2015) Reconstructed metagenomes reveal changes of microbial functional profiling during PAHs degradation along a rice (Oryza sativa) rhizosphere gradient. J Appl Microbiol 118(4):890–900
Malik S, Beer M, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2008) The use of molecular techniques to characterize the microbial communities in contaminated soil and water. Environ Int 34(2):265–276
Martin HG, Ivanova N, Kunin V, Warnecke F, Barry KW, McHardy AC, Yeates C, He S, Salamov AA, Szeto E, Dalin E (2006) Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities. Nat Biotechnol 24(10):1263–1269
Meier MJ, Paterson ES, Lambert IB (2015) Metagenomic analysis of an aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soil using substrate-induced gene expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 82(3):897–909
Meier MJ, Paterson ES, Lambert IB (2016) Use of substrate-induced gene expression in metagenomic analysis of an aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 82(3):897–909
Muller EE, Pinel N, Laczny CC, Hoopmann MR, Narayanasamy S, Lebrun LA, Roume H, Lin J, May P, Hicks ND, Heintz-Buschart A (2014) Community-integrated omics links dominance of a microbial generalist to fine-tuned resource usage. Nat Commun 5:5603
Peng RH, Xiong AS, Xue Y, Fu XY, Gao F, Zhao W, Tian YS, Yao QH (2010) A profile of ring-hydroxylating oxygenases that degrade aromatic pollutants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 206:65–94 (Springer: New York)
Prosser JI (2015) Dispersing misconceptions and identifying opportunities for the use of ‘omics’ in soil microbial ecology. Nat Rev Microbiol 13(7):439–446
Rylott EL, Lorenz A, Bruce NC (2011) Biodegradation and biotransformation of explosives. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22(3):434–440
Scholz MB, Lo CC, Chain PS (2012) Next generation sequencing and bioinformatic bottlenecks: the current state of metagenomic data analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23(1):9–15
Shendure J, Ji H (2008) Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 26(10):1135–1145
Sierra-Garcia IN, Alvarez JC, de Vasconcellos SP, de Souza AP, dos Santos Neto EV, de Oliveira VM (2014) New hydrocarbon degradation pathways in the microbial metagenome from Brazilian petroleum reservoirs. PLoS One 9(2):e90087
Simon C, Daniel R (2011) Metagenomic analyses: past and future trends. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(4):1153–1161
Singh S, Kang SH, Mulchandani A, Chen W (2008) Bioremediation: environmental clean-up through pathway engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19(5):437–444
Singleton DR, Powel SN, Sangaiah R, Gold A, Ball LM, Aitken MD (2005) Stable-isotope probing of bacteria capable of degrading salicylate, naphthalene, or phenanthrene in a bioreactor treating contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(3):1202–1209
Srujana K, Khan AB (2012) Isolation and characterisation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degrading soil microbes from automobile workshop sediments. J Environ Sci Technol 5(1):74–83
Standfuß-Gabisch C, Al-Halbouni D, Hofer B (2012) Characterization of biphenyl dioxygenase sequences and activities encoded by the metagenomes of highly polychlorobiphenyl-contaminated soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(8):2706–2715
Stenuit B, Eyers L, Schuler L, Agathos SN, George I (2008) Emerging high-throughput approaches to analyze bioremediation of sites contaminated with hazardous and/or recalcitrant wastes. Biotechnol Adv 26(6):561–575
Suenaga H (2012) Targeted metagenomics: a high-resolution metagenomics approach for specific gene clusters in complex microbial communities. Environ Microbiol 14(1):13–22
Suenaga H, Ohnuki T, Miyazaki K (2007) Functional screening of a metagenomic library for genes involved in microbial degradation of aromatic compounds. Environ Microbiol 9(9):2289–2297
Suenaga H, Mizuta S, Miyazaki K (2009) The molecular basis for adaptive evolution in novel extradiol dioxygenases retrieved from the metagenome. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 69(3):472–480
Tannieres M, Beury-Cirou A, Vigouroux A, Mondy S, Pellissier F, Dessaux Y, Faure D (2013) A metagenomic study highlights phylogenetic proximity of quorum-quenching and xenobiotic-degrading amidases of the AS-family. PLoS One 8(6):e65473
Taupp M, Mewis K, Hallam SJ (2011) The art and design of functional metagenomic screens. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22(3):465–472
Theerachat M, Emond S, Cambon E, Bordes F, Marty A, Nicaud JM, Chulalaksananukul W, Guieysse D, Remaud-Siméon M, Morel S (2012) Engineering and production of laccase from Trametes versicolor in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Bioresour Technol 125:267–274
Thomas T, Gilbert J, Meyer F (2015) A 123 of metagenomics. In: Nelson KE (ed) Encyclopedia of metagenomics. Springer, New York, pp 1–9
Turnbaugh PJ, Gordon JI (2008) An invitation to the marriage of metagenomics and metabolomics. Cell 134(5):708–713
Tyson GW, Chapman J, Hugenholtz P, Allen EE, Ram RJ, Richardson PM, Solovyev VV, Rubin EM, Rokhsar DS, Banfield JF (2004) Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature 428(6978):37–43
Uchiyama T, Miyazaki K (2013) Metagenomic screening for aromatic compound-responsive transcriptional regulators. PLoS One 8(9):e75795
Ufarte L, Laville E, Duquesne S, Potocki-Veronese G (2015) Metagenomics for the discovery of pollutant degrading enzymes. Biotechnol Adv 33(8):1845–1854
Uhlik O, Wald J, Strejcek M, Musilova L, Ridl J, Hroudova M, Vlcek C, Cardenas E, Mackova M, Macek T (2012) Identification of bacteria utilizing biphenyl, benzoate, and naphthalene in long-term contaminated soil. PLoS One 7(7):e40653
Uhlik O, Leewis MC, Strejcek M, Musilova L, Mackova M, Leigh MB, Macek T (2013) Stable isotope probing in the metagenomics era: a bridge towards improved bioremediation. Biotechnol Adv 31(2):154–165
Vijgen J, Abhilash PC, Li YF, Lal R, Forter M, Torres J, Singh N, Yunus M, Tian C, Schäffer A, Weber R (2011) Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) as new Stockholm convention POPs—a global perspective on the management of lindane and its waste isomers. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18(2):152–162
Vikram S, Pandey J, Kumar S, Raghava GPS (2013) Genes involved in degradation of para-nitrophenol are differentially arranged in form of non-contiguous gene clusters in Burkholderia sp. strain SJ98. PLoS One 8(12):e84766
Yergeau E, Sanschagrin S, Beaumier D, Greer CW (2012) Metagenomic analysis of the bioremediation of diesel-contaminated Canadian high arctic soils. PLoS One 7:e30058
Yong YC, Zhong JJ (2010) Recent advances in biodegradation in China: new microorganisms and pathways, biodegradation engineering, and bioenergy from pollutant biodegradation. Process Biochem 45(12):1937–1943
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Pondicherry University for providing Internet access to collect the information essential for writing this book chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kathi, S. (2017). Emerging Metagenomic Strategies for Assessing Xenobiotic Contaminated Sites. In: Hashmi, M., Kumar, V., Varma, A. (eds) Xenobiotics in the Soil Environment. Soil Biology, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47744-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47744-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47743-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47744-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)