Abstract
Signal transduction pathways are central to all cellular biological processes, as they provide the link between extracellular or intracellular stimuli and an array of regulatory proteins, including protein kinases, ubiquitin ligases, and transcription factors. Given this, it is not surprising that signal transduction pathways are often deregulated in cancer. Indeed, melanoma is a paradigm for rewired signaling because most critical mutations discovered in this tumor type are centered around relatively few major signaling cues, the most significant of which are the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathways. Both pathways contain regulatory components with catalytic activities, making them the preferred targets for therapy. Here, we summarize our current understanding of the major deregulated signaling pathways in melanoma and the implications of such deregulation for tumor biology.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
- Melanoma Cell
- BRAF Mutation
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression
- Immune Checkpoint
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
7.1 Introduction
Signal transduction pathways are central to all cellular biological processes, as they provide the link between extracellular or intracellular stimuli and an array of regulatory proteins, including protein kinases, ubiquitin ligases, and transcription factors. Given this, it is not surprising that signal transduction pathways are often deregulated in cancer. Indeed, melanoma is a paradigm for rewired signaling because most critical mutations discovered in this tumor type are centered around relatively few major signaling cues, the most significant of which are the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathways. Both pathways contain regulatory components with catalytic activities, making them the preferred targets for therapy. Here, we summarize our current understanding of the major deregulated signaling pathways in melanoma and the implications of such deregulation for tumor biology.
7.1.1 Extracellular Receptors
Among the receptors reported to be deregulated in melanoma are numerous membrane-bound G protein-coupled receptors and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), including MC1R (melanocortin 1 receptor), c-Kit (mast/stem cell growth factor receptor), c-Met (hepatocyte growth factor receptor), IGFR (insulin-like growth factor receptor), and Frizzled (WNT receptor). Deregulation of other RTKs, including AXL, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), has also been implicated in the resistance of melanomas to certain treatments such as BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) (Fargnoli et al. 2010; Landi et al. 2006; Mattei et al. 1994; Topcu-Yilmaz et al. 2010; van Ginkel et al. 2004).
7.1.1.1 MC1R
MC1R is a melanocyte-specific G protein-coupled receptor that binds to α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH, Fig. 7.1). MC1R–α-MSH interactions play a central role in the regulation of both pigmentation, by inducing generation of eumelanin and cAMP, and melanocyte proliferation (Hunt et al. 1995; Mountjoy et al. 1992; Robinson and Healy 2002; Suzuki et al. 1996).
MC1R exhibits genetic variance, with mutations at the hot spot residues R151C, R160W, and D294H being the most significant. The mutations reduce receptor function and result in a phenotype of fair, freckled skin and red hair (Kadekaro et al. 2003). Stimulation of MC1R by α-MSH normally potentiates p16INK4A tumor suppressor activity after UV exposure (Pavey et al. 2002); these specific mutations are associated with reduced UV-induced DNA damage repair efficiency and increased melanoma risk (Scott et al. 2002; Song et al. 2009). In contrast, overexpression of MC1R variants has been shown to render cells insensitive to α-MSH-mediated suppression of cell proliferation (Robinson and Healy 2002), suggesting that polymorphic variants of MC1R may enhance melanoma susceptibility or progression by attenuating p16INK4A function, at least in part.
Although MC1R is neither genetically nor epigenetically silenced (Kim et al. 2008a), expression of the functionally impaired variants compromises receptor activity and correlates with increased melanoma risk (Landi et al. 2006). Carriers of MC1R variants who have mutations in CDK2NA also have a higher melanoma risk (Fargnoli et al. 2010). Notably, germline mutations of MC1R are associated with an increased incidence of BRAF mutations in melanoma (Landi et al. 2006). Likewise, inactivation of MC1R in the BrafV600E:Pten−/− mouse melanoma model increases the incidence of melanoma independently of UV radiation (Mitra et al. 2012).
Mutation of G proteins themselves, in particular the α-subunit of G(q) (GNAQ), may induce alterations in early melanoma lesions (Kusters-Vandevelde et al. 2010; Lamba et al. 2010; Van Raamsdonk et al. 2009). GNAQ is mutated within a RAS-like domain at position Q209L, which renders the protein constitutively active and amplifies PKC and MAPK signaling. Accordingly, overexpression of the GNAQ Q209L mutant is sufficient to confer anchorage independence and increase the tumorigenicity of immortalized melanocytes.
7.1.1.2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
Many cell surface receptors for growth factors, hormones, and cytokines are RTKs. Ligand binding activates the intrinsic RTK enzymatic activity, often by autophosphorylation, with subsequent phosphorylation of tyrosine residues on many substrates, including PLCγ, PI3K, and MAPK, which drive cell proliferation differentiation, survival, and cell migration. Among the growth factor RTKs deregulated in melanoma are AXL, EGFR, c-Kit, c-Met, and IGFR, which bind to growth arrest-specific 6 (Gas6), epidermal growth factor (EGF), stem cell factor (SCF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF), respectively (Fig. 7.2). Ligand binding by these receptors activates the downstream RAS–RAF–MEK–MAPK and PI3K–AKT signaling pathways independently of any existing MAPK pathway mutations and promotes cell survival and proliferation. Changes in the expression of these receptors have been implicated in several tumor types; in melanoma, altered expression has not been observed uniformly but may be associated with specific phases of tumor development.
7.1.1.3 AXL
AXL RTK is ubiquitously expressed in epithelial, mesenchymal, and hematopoietic tumors, and in the corresponding non-transformed cells. AXL was discovered in patients with chronic myeloproliferative disorder, and has since been implicated in the proliferation and drug resistance of numerous cancers, including melanoma (Paccez et al. 2014).
AXL is upregulated in ocular melanomas and melanoma cell lines, where it promotes cell proliferation and confers a survival advantage under serum starvation conditions (van Ginkel et al. 2004). Increased AXL expression is also found in both NRAS- or BRAF-mutated tumors, although the incidence is higher in NRAS mutant melanomas. Of interest, AXL expression inversely correlates with melanoma differentiation and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) expression (Muller et al. 2014), and the combination of low MITF and high AXL expression is associated with a highly invasive phenotype. Pharmacological AXL inhibitors attenuate but do not abolish the invasive phenotype (Sensi et al. 2011), indicating a role for other RTKs and/or signaling pathways in the invasive phenotype. In response to chemotherapy, a subset of tumor cells that exhibit a senescence phenotype show elevated production and secretion of cytokines (Ohanna et al. 2011), with concomitant activation of STAT3 and AXL and increased migration and invasion properties in surrounding cells (Ohanna et al. 2013).
Lastly, a major clinical obstacle in melanoma therapy is the acquisition of resistance to either BRAFi or MEKi. The mechanisms underlying such resistance include upregulation of AXL, among many RTKs, which coincides with low levels of MITF and activation of NF-kB and JAK1 (Konieczkowski et al. 2014). Accordingly, treatment of resistant melanomas with a pharmacological inhibitor of AXL augments the effect of the BRAFi or MEKi and enhances cell death (Muller et al. 2014).
7.1.1.4 EGFR
EGFR is a transmembrane receptor for members of the EGF family of growth factors. Increased expression or mutation of the EGFR gene is commonly seen in a number of tumor types, including colorectal, breast, and non-small cell lung cancers, where it is thought to serve as an oncogenic driver.
EGFR upregulation has been implicated as a mechanism of therapy resistance for several tumor types, including melanoma. Consistent with this, co-administration of BRAFi and EGFRi appears to attenuate ERK activity and sensitizes resistant melanomas to BRAFi or MEKi inhibition (Girotti et al. 2013). The resistance of BRAFV600E mutant colorectal cancer to BRAFi therapy has also been associated with high EGFR expression, which enables reactivation of ERK via RAS and CRAF to bypass BRAF inhibition (Corcoran et al. 2012).
Elevated EGFR expression, as observed in resistant melanoma, has been linked to SOX10 and MITF expression (Ji et al. 2015). Furthermore, EGFR upregulation is often accompanied by upregulation of other RTKs that are associated with SOX10 and TGF-β signaling, including platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (Sun et al. 2014).
Interestingly, SOX10 was also found to regulate the expression of the ubiquitin ligase RNF125, which controls JAK1 stability through ubiquitin–proteasome-dependent degradation. BRAFi-resistant melanomas exhibit downregulation of SOX10 and concomitant inhibition of RNF125 expression. Consequently, JAK1 stability and availability increase, and the expression of several RTKs, including EGFR and AXL, is stimulated. As might be expected, inhibition of JAK1 effectively reduces the expression of RTKs and overcomes the resistance of melanomas to BRAFi (Kim et al. 2015).
7.1.1.5 c-Kit
c-Kit expression is apparent in early or radial growth phase melanomas. Although the penetrance appears to be low, a c-Kit-activating mutation, L576P, has been reported in melanoma (Antonescu et al. 2007; Rivera et al. 2008; Willmore-Payne et al. 2006). Interestingly, however, downregulation of c-Kit expression is associated with melanoma progression (Giehl et al. 2007; Janku et al. 2005; Montone et al. 1997; Natali et al. 1992). These observations suggest that upregulation of c-Kit and its ligand SCF may be required to establish the primary lesions, but that continued expression of c-Kit is not needed for invasion and metastasis. The disparity of mutations in or altered expression of c-Kit among different melanomas was initially overlooked in clinical trials of c-Kit-specific inhibitors. In more recent trials, clinical efficacy has been observed when patient cohorts harboring c-Kit mutations were treated with the highly selective pharmacological inhibitor, Gleevec (Terheyden et al. 2010). How inhibition of c-Kit contributes to melanoma progression remains an important topic for investigation. The c-Kit ligand SCF is a keratinocyte-secreted factor, and it has been proposed that downregulation of c-Kit in melanoma cells may allow them to escape SCF-induced cell death. Indeed, in vitro studies have shown that re-expression of c-Kit in metastatic melanoma sensitizes the cells to SCF-mediated apoptosis and reduces their tumorigenic and metastatic potential in vivo (Bar-Eli 1997; Huang et al. 1996; Willmore-Payne et al. 2005).
Although the mechanism by which c-Kit is downregulated during melanoma progression remains unclear, a recent study found that downregulation may be epigenetically linked to expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) (see also Chap. 6), specifically miR-221 and miR-222, which were shown to suppress expression of both c-Kit and p27Kip (Felicetti et al. 2008).
7.1.1.6 c-Met
c-Met-dependent signaling is amplified in melanoma, although genetic mutations or modifications that result in aberrant activation of c-Met do not appear to be common. Two c-Met mutations, N948S and R988C, have been identified in melanoma cell lines and tumor tissues and shown to activate c-Met signaling through several downstream effectors, including MITF, tyrosinase, and AKT and its effectors (Chin et al. 2006; Puri et al. 2007). However, c-Met upregulation has also been observed in melanoma, particularly in the later stages of disease (Natali et al. 1993). This has been suggested to play a role in metastasis, especially in the liver (Rusciano et al. 1995). Genetic amplification and activation of c-Met concomitant with Src activation has been reported in BRAFi-resistant melanoma cells; accordingly, genetic or pharmacological inhibition of c-Met attenuated the proliferation and invasion of the BRAFi-resistant cells (Vergani et al. 2011).
c-Met upregulation can be induced by a number of mechanisms. One is via MITF, which is induced by MC1R–α-MSH signaling, as mentioned above (Rouzaud et al. 2006; Rusciano et al. 1999). Indeed, impaired MC1R function, which is frequently observed in melanoma, is indicative of deregulated c-Met at both the genetic and protein levels.
The ubiquitin ligase skeletotrophin is another protein implicated in the regulation of c-Met. In melanoma, expression of skeletotrophin is lost due to increased SNAIL-mediated transcriptional repression. Re-expression of skeletotrophin impairs the invasive capacity of melanoma cells in vitro, and this correlates with a reduction in c-Met mRNA transcripts (Takeuchi et al. 2006). MicroRNAs have been shown to contribute to increased c-Met levels in melanoma. miR-34a is normally expressed in melanocytes but is downregulated in melanoma. Here too, re-expression of miR-34a in vitro reduces c-Met expression and suppresses the growth, migration, and invasive capacities of melanoma cells (Yan et al. 2009).
7.1.1.7 IGFR1
IGF1R is another growth factor receptor that is upregulated in progressively malignant melanoma (Mallikarjuna et al. 2006). In early melanoma lesions, IGF1R appears to enhance cellular growth and survival by promoting MAPK- and ß-catenin-dependent signaling pathways; however, IGF1R-dependent stimulation of these two pathways may be dispensable in later stage melanomas where other oncogenes are constitutively activated (Satyamoorthy et al. 2001).
Upregulation of IGF1R is associated with both malignant progression and resistance to apoptotic stimuli. Antisense-mediated inhibition of IGF1R is sufficient to inhibit the growth of mouse melanoma cells in nude mice (Resnicoff et al. 1994), and monoclonal antibody-targeted inhibition of IGF1R in human melanoma cells similarly inhibits their growth and invasion in xenograft mouse models (Maloney et al. 2003). Furthermore, disruption of IGF1R can sensitize melanoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis (Karasic et al. 2010) and increase radiosensitivity of melanoma by impairing the ATM-mediated DNA damage response (Macaulay et al. 2001). Moreover, inhibition of IGF1R is sufficient to suppress growth of human melanomas harboring the BRAFV600E mutation (discussed further below), indicating that IGF1R inhibition can override signaling events that circumvent the known IGF1R effector, the RAS-MAPK signaling axis (Yeh et al. 2006). High levels of IGF1R have been reported in BRAFi-resistant cells, and have been implicated in upregulation of the PI3K pathway (Villanueva et al. 2010).
7.2 Cellular Kinases and Transcription Factors
7.2.1 WNT–ß-catenin
The WNT–ß-catenin signaling pathway plays an important regulatory role in melanocyte development and is deregulated in melanoma (see also Chap. 5). WNT is a secreted ligand for the membrane receptor, Frizzled (Fig. 7.3), and WNT binding activates the cytoplasmic Frizzled effector, Dishevelled. Consequently, Dishevelled inhibits GSK3ß–Axin–APC-mediated degradation of ß-catenin, stabilizing its levels and allowing nuclear import to execute its transcriptional functions. Activation of the WNT–ß-catenin pathway facilitates ß-catenin-mediated upregulation of MITF, which promotes melanocyte differentiation and development (Dorsky et al. 2000; Takeda et al. 2000). MITF can itself bind to ß-catenin, thereby tilting the transcriptional activity towards MITF targets and generating a positive feedback loop (Schepsky et al. 2006).
As expected, melanomas harboring activating ß-catenin mutations also have increased MITF levels (Doglioni et al. 2003). In turn, MITF upregulation has been shown to increase multivesicular body synthesis and consequently WNT signaling, allowing the cells to enter a proliferative stage (Ploper et al. 2015). Interestingly, ß-catenin also upregulates the transcription factor Brn-2, which transcriptionally represses Mitf and simultaneously enhances invasive melanoma behavior. Brn-2 expression also characterizes distinct subsets of MITF-negative melanoma cells (Goodall et al. 2008). The implications of MITF heterogeneity within the same and different tumors is the subject of intense investigation.
WNT–ß-catenin signaling is upregulated in melanoma, and although only ~3 % of melanoma biopsies harbor ß-catenin mutations, ~30 % of human melanomas exhibit increased nuclear localization of ß-catenin (Larue and Delmas 2006). Increased WNT signaling directly upregulates Mitf and Brn-2 expression, with concomitant suppression of p16INK4A transcription; these changes act in concert to drive melanoma growth and proliferation (Delmas et al. 2007; Goodall et al. 2004a; Widlund et al. 2002). Nuclear localization of ß-catenin is observed in melanomas carrying mutant phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) phosphatase and has been implicated in melanomagenesis by cooperating with NRASQ61K to increase caveolin-dependent transcriptional activity. This effectively bypasses the senescence phenotype elicited by mutant NRAS alone and promotes metastasis, in part by internalization of E-cadherin (Conde-Perez et al. 2015).
Interestingly, the functional role of WNT signaling in melanoma development varies with the specific WNT isoform. WNT3, an activator of the canonical WNT signaling axis, is anti-tumorigenic and its expression correlates with primary/nevi lesions and decreased proliferation of tumor models in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, WNT3 expression correlates with upregulation of genes controlling melanocyte development and differentiation, including Axin, Tcf7, and Mitf (Chien et al. 2009). In contrast, WNT5A, which activates the non-canonical WNT signaling axis, appears to antagonize the transcriptional effects of WNT3A. Indeed, WNT5A is pro-tumorigenic, cooperating with other signaling pathways (e.g., PKC) to enhance the metastatic and invasive behavior of melanoma cells, which most likely occurs through its known function in the re-distribution of adhesion receptors (Weeraratna et al. 2002; Witze et al. 2008). Consistent with this, WNT5A-positive melanoma tumors appear to exhibit increased invasiveness and decreased proliferation compared with WNT5A-negative but MITF- and Melan-A-positive tumors, supporting a model of proliferative vs invasive phenotype switching during tumor progression (Eichhoff et al. 2010). Of note, increased WNT5A expression was also seen in tumors with acquired BRAFi resistance, and its inhibition re-sensitized tumors to BRAFi and reduced their proliferation, in part via attenuation of p-AKT activity (Anastas et al. 2014).
Melanomas with activated WNT–β-catenin signaling have a strong immunosuppressive effect on dendritic cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, mediated by increased IL-10 secretion and reduced IFN-γ secretion by the T cells. In this regard, it is interesting to note that activated WNT–β-catenin signaling has been linked with resistance to immunotherapy (Spranger et al. 2015; Yaguchi et al. 2012).
7.2.2 MAPK Signaling Axis
Alterations in the expression or activity of AXL, EGFR, MC1R, c-Kit, c-Met, IGFR, and WNT are examples of the most external layers of perturbed signaling cues that promote melanoma formation and progression. Several of the signaling pathways downstream of these receptors are themselves deregulated in melanoma.
The majority of melanomas display deregulated MAPK signaling due to mutations in the NRAS or BRAF genes. As a consequence, the downstream kinases and transcription factors are rendered constitutively active, regardless of aberrations upstream of NRAS or BRAF. In this section, we review our current understanding of alterations in the MAPK signaling axis and the implications for melanoma development or progression.
The MAPK pathway is coupled to upstream membrane receptors by the RAS family of small G proteins; HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS (Bos 1989; Dhillon et al. 2007). In non-transformed cells, the RAS proteins are responsive to activation by c-Kit, c-Met, IGFR, and WNT, for example, and transduce activating signals through interplay with the RAF family of effector serine/threonine kinases; ARAF, BRAF, and CRAF. Signals are then transduced by sequential activation of a cascade of MAP kinases: MEK, MEKK, and finally, ERK (Fig. 7.2). Of these proteins, NRAS and BRAF are the most commonly mutated in melanoma, with ~15 % and more than 50 % of melanomas harboring NRAS and BRAF mutations, respectively (Davies et al. 2002; Fecher et al. 2007). Further downstream, MEK mutations have also been reported, particularly in the context of acquired resistance to chemotherapy. For instance, MEK1 mutations occur at low incidence overall, but they are most frequently reported following BRAFi therapy and confer resistance to MEKi and BRAFi (Emery et al. 2009; Murugan et al. 2009).
While most melanoma-associated mutations in NRAS occur at amino acid 61, BRAF deregulation is attributed to mutations at several hotspots, most prominently V600E, resulting in a constitutively active kinase (Wan et al. 2004). Indeed, the catalytic activity of BRAFV600E was calculated to be ~10-fold higher than that of wild-type BRAF (Brummer et al. 2006). While mutant BRAF and NRAS share some downstream effectors, most notably ERK, they each also activate unique downstream components. As illustrated in Fig. 7.2, BRAF activity also affects MEK–ERK kinases and RSK. These kinases in turn suppress the activity of the LKB1–AMPK signaling pathway, thereby promoting melanoma proliferation (Esteve-Puig et al. 2009; Zheng et al. 2009). As a result of their unique contributions to signaling, BRAF and NRAS mutants have distinct characteristics with respect to melanoma development and progression.
As noted above, ERK is the downstream kinase most commonly affected by NRAS and BRAF mutations in melanoma, and constitutive or super-activation of ERK perturbs critical regulators of cellular behavior. For example, BRAFV600E antagonizes apoptosis via ERK-dependent inhibition of the apoptotic proteins Bad, Bim, and PUMA, and upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Mcl-1 (Jiang et al. 2008; Sheridan et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2007b). Enhanced ERK activation also alters cell cycle control and proliferation by suppressing the negative cell cycle regulator p27/Kip1 (Kortylewski et al. 2001) and, importantly, by modulating the expression of melanocyte MITF isoforms and inducing the M-MITF 6a isoform (Primot et al. 2010; Wellbrock et al. 2008). MAPK/ERK activation can further enhance the proliferative capacity of melanoma cells by promoting upregulation of other transcription factors such as c-Jun and Brn-2, either by increasing their stability (c-Jun) or increasing their expression (Brn-2) (Goodall et al. 2004a, b; Lopez-Bergami et al. 2007). Mutant BRAF-mediated ERK signaling also impinges on invasive cellular behaviors resulting from changes in growth or invasion regulatory proteins such as Plexin B or matrix metalloproteinase-1 (Argast et al. 2009; Huntington et al. 2004). Indeed, activation of the RAS–RAF–MAPK–ERK pathway has been implicated in immune evasion by modulating the production of immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-6, IL-10, and VEGF by melanoma cells (Sumimoto et al. 2006).
Constitutive upregulation of ERK signaling results in rewiring of signaling pathways, a common occurrence in many tumors, including melanoma. For example, rewired ERK signaling causes constitutive activation of c-Jun via two complementary pathways. ERK-mediated upregulation of RSK–CREB increases c-Jun transcription, whereas ERK-mediated phosphorylation of GSK3ß inhibits its ability to phosphorylate c-Jun on residue 243, which is required for targeting of c-Jun for ubiquitination and degradation by FBW7 (Nateri et al. 2004; Wei et al. 2005), thereby resulting in increased c-Jun stability (Lopez-Bergami et al. 2007). In turn, c-Jun induces transcription of a large set of targets genes that include cell cycle regulators such as Cyclin D as well as components of other signaling pathways. One is the PKC adaptor protein RACK1, which potentiates both PKC and JNK signaling. As a result, RACK1–PKC signaling increases JNK activity and further activates its substrates, including c-Jun, thus enforcing a feed-forward signaling pathway. Another c-Jun transcriptional target implicated in melanoma development is the kinase PDK1, which activates AKT. The c-Jun-mediated increase in PDK1 transcription, and thus activation of both the AKT and PKC pathways. Inhibition of c-Jun effectively attenuates melanoma development in a xenograft mouse model, and this can be rescued by re-expression of PDK1 (Lopez-Bergami et al. 2010). Thus, ERK signaling causes activation of the JNK, PKC, PDK1, and AKT pathways, representing a paradigm for rewired signaling.
Constitutive activation of MAPK itself is sufficient for transformation of immortalized melanocytes through elevation of angiogenic and invasive behavior secondary to upregulation of VEGF and MMP-2 (Govindarajan et al. 2003). However, synergistic crosstalk between upregulated MAPK signaling and other major signaling axes (e.g., PI3K–AKT–MTOR), can further promote additional tumorigenic behaviors such as the enhanced proliferation observed in uveal melanoma (Babchia et al. 2010).
Upregulated or constitutive activation of the MAPK signaling cascade correlates with poor clinical outcome (Houben et al. 2004), which is commonly attributed to activating mutations at different branch points along the signaling pathway. Thus, HRAS and KRAS mutations appear to correlate with benign Spitz nevi and primary lesions, whereas NRAS is most frequently mutated in primary and metastatic melanoma and is characteristic of chronically sun-exposed lesions (Ball et al. 1994; Jafari et al. 1995; Jiveskog et al. 1998; Shukla et al. 1989; van Dijk et al. 2005; van Elsas et al. 1995). Immediately downstream of the RAS proteins are the RAF kinases, of which BRAF is the most frequently mutated (specifically BRAFV600E) in melanoma. The more dominant oncogenic role of BRAF compared with ARAF and CRAF is most likely due to its higher kinase activity (Emuss et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2005). Although BRAF germline mutations have been reported, they are not common in familial melanoma (Lang et al. 2003), suggesting that BRAF mutations occur during melanoma development. Interestingly, BRAFV600E and NRAS mutations appear to be mutually exclusive in melanoma; a phenomenon that may be influenced by type and site of origin of the melanoma tumor. For example, BRAF mutation does not appear to correlate with the degree of sun exposure, as is the case for NRAS mutations (Davies et al. 2002). Interestingly, NRAS mutations induce a switch in the dominant usage of RAF isoforms from BRAF to CRAF (Dumaz et al. 2006).
Mutant BRAF is also found in congenital nevi and other non-malignant lesions, where it is associated with upregulation of senescence markers such as senescence-associated ß-galactosidase (SA-ß-gal) and mosaic p16INK4A induction (Michaloglou et al. 2005). Indeed, mutations of NRAS and BRAF (V600E) alone can promote cellular senescence in vitro, which not only illustrates oncogene-induced senescence but also highlights the need for other oncogenic events to drive tumor progression (see also Chaps. 4, 5, and 11). Nevertheless, ERK activity does not always correlate with BRAF activation, most likely due to variations in the functional status of ERK phosphatases. It has been proposed that some ERK phosphatases might be less active in malignant than non-malignant cells, although it is not yet clear whether and how ERK phosphatases might be deregulated in melanoma. In this regard, BRAF mutation alone is insufficient to transform melanocytes, and secondary mutations that confer uncontrolled cell cycle progression are required. The notion that BRAF acts cooperatively to induce melanoma development is supported by observations in zebrafish, where mutant BRAF promotes nevi development but additional oncogenic changes, such as loss of p53, can promote progression to invasive lesions (Patton et al. 2005).
Other secondary mutations that can support uncontrolled proliferation include p16INK4A and p19INK4D (see cell cycle section). Although it is unclear what role p16INK4A may play in BRAF-driven senescence, loss of p16INK4A can facilitate melanoma tumor formation driven by mutant RAS (Ackermann et al. 2005; Chin et al. 1997). Interestingly, cooperative stabilization of ß-catenin results in silencing of p16INK4A, and in combination with mutant NRAS, this is sufficient to promote melanoma progression (Delmas et al. 2007). Additional signaling mechanisms that contribute to oncogene-induced senescence and earlier barriers to melanoma progression continue to be identified. For example, early oncogene-induced activation of the ER stress-activated unfolded protein response was found to halt tumorigenesis independently of conventional senescence mechanisms (Denoyelle et al. 2006).
Although epigenetic perturbations that promote activation of these pathways remain largely obscure, the mutational status of melanoma tumors is known to correlate with some characteristic epigenetic profiles. For example, melanomas with BRAF mutations exhibit changes in several miRNAs, such as downregulation of miR-193a, miR-338, and miR-565, and upregulation of miR-191 (Caramuta et al. 2010). A further level of complexity is suggested by the finding that pseudogene transcripts can act as false miRNA “decoy” targets (a.k.a., competitive endogenous RNAs), thereby absorbing and nullifying the function of miRNAs targeting specific endogenous transcripts (Chen 2010; Poliseno et al. 2010; Karreth et al. 2015). Such regulation has been demonstrated for PTEN and BRAF and may effectively alter the expression of other genes that are central to the control of melanoma development. As increasing effort is devoted to sequencing the melanoma genome, a wealth of pseudogenes contributing to different stages of melanoma biology are expected to be identified (Pleasance et al. 2010).
7.2.3 PTEN–PI3K–AKT
The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase–AKT (PI3K–AKT) pathway is also frequently deregulated in melanoma (Inoue-Narita et al. 2008; Robertson 2005), although the mechanisms underlying the deregulation of many components remain largely elusive. Like the MAPK pathway, the PI3K pathway is an effector signaling cascade positioned downstream of the membrane receptors described earlier, including c-Met and IGFR1. PI3K converts phosphatidylinositol-4,5 bisphosphate (PIP2), located on the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane, into the secondary lipid signaling molecule, phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5 trisphosphate (PIP3). In turn, PIP3 activates the downstream effector AKT/protein kinase B. The three members of the AKT family of serine/threonine kinases (AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3) have well-characterized pro-survival functions (Datta et al. 1999; Madhunapantula and Robertson 2009) (Fig. 7.4), with AKT3 appearing to be the isoform most affected in melanoma.
One mechanism by which AKT signaling is enhanced is via deregulation of PIP2 processing by perturbation of inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II (Gewinner et al. 2009). However, upregulation of AKT activity in melanoma can largely be attributed to deregulation of its negative regulator, PTEN (Parmiter et al. 1988). Although loss of PTEN protein is prevalent in melanoma (Chudnovsky et al. 2005), deregulation by mutation accounts for only a small fraction of melanomas with deregulated PTEN. Accordingly, while PTEN is commonly mutated in melanoma cell lines, such genetic mutations are rare in actual tumor samples, particularly those of metastatic grade (Goel et al. 2006; Pollock et al. 2002; Wu et al. 2003). These observations indicate that downregulation or loss of PTEN in patient’s tumors results from additional transcriptional and post-translational modifications, with the latter being the most common. Although not shown yet in melanoma, the ubiquitin ligase NEDD-4, which targets PTEN for destruction, is upregulated in numerous cancer types, including gastric and colorectal cancers (Kim et al. 2008b; Trotman et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2007a). Oncogenic deregulation of PTEN also occurs via Fyn-related kinase (FRK, previously known as RAK), which is overexpressed in melanoma and numerous other cancers. FRK phosphorylates PTEN, thereby abrogating its interaction with NEDD-4 and increasing its availability (Brauer and Tyner 2009; Yim et al. 2009).
Other forms of epigenetic silencing of PTEN include promoter methylation, which is observed in up to 62 % of patients with metastatic melanoma (Mirmohammadsadegh et al. 2006). In effect, loss of PTEN promotes an excess of PIP3 and activation of AKT and its downstream targets, resulting in increased growth and survival of melanoma. Notably, activated AKT which is affected by deregulated PTEN is inversely correlated with a positive clinical outcome for melanoma patients (Dai et al. 2005).
In addition to loss of PTEN, direct changes to AKT family members can modulate the PI3K pathway in melanoma. Of the three AKT isoforms, AKT3 is specifically and significantly upregulated in sporadic melanoma tumors, particularly those of metastatic grade (Robertson 2005; Stahl et al. 2004). Although AKT3 upregulation has mainly been attributed directly to an increase in genomic copy number, a recent report has identified a novel activating mutation of AKT3 (E17K) in some melanoma cases (Davies et al. 2008). Targeted siRNA-mediated silencing of AKT3 is sufficient to suppress melanoma progression and induce cell death, emphasizing the oncogenic potential of deregulated AKT3 activation.
AKT signaling affects numerous cellular process: it influences cell cycle dynamics through regulation of the G1/S phase regulator Cyclin D3 (Spofford et al. 2006); affects cell growth, metabolism, and proliferation via control of VEGF expression and interplay with mTOR and the TORC1 and TORC2 complexes (Bhaskar and Hay 2007; Govindarajan et al. 2007; Levine et al. 2006); contributes to invasive behavior by NF-kB-mediated regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 (Kim et al. 2001); and suppresses apoptosis by inhibiting the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bad and caspase-9 (Cardone et al. 1998; Datta et al. 1997). Each of these AKT effects can be attenuated or suppressed by the antagonistic function of PTEN. Importantly, deregulation of the ERK–c-Jun signaling axis in melanoma leads to c-Jun-mediated transcriptional upregulation of PDK1, further enhancing AKT activation (Lopez-Bergami et al. 2010). PDK1 has also been demonstrated to make critical AKT-independent contributions to tumorigenesis via activation of its substrate SGK3/CISK; this has been shown for breast cancer, among others (Vasudevan et al. 2009).
Recent studies using genetic melanoma models have substantiated the role of PDK1 in the development and progression of melanoma. Thus, melanocyte-specific inactivation of PDK1 in the BrafV600E::Pten−/− mouse model delayed the formation of tumors and largely abolished the metastatic lesions commonly seen in this model. Consistent with these findings, examination of melanoma tissue microarrays revealed upregulation of PDK1 in primary melanomas compared with nevi (Scortegagna et al. 2014). Further dissection of the pathways underlying the PDK1 effects on melanoma development identified a role for the PDK1 substrate SGK3. Indeed, inhibition of SGK3 partially phenocopied the changes seen upon PDK1 inhibition. Interestingly, a synthetic lethal screen for kinases that may synergize with PDK1 in eliciting these effects identified PI3K, suggesting that concerted inhibition of the PI3K–PDK1 axis alone may suffice to inhibit growth of BRAF-mutant melanomas (Scortegagna et al. 2014, 2015).
7.3 Cell Cycle Regulation
Malignant melanoma cells are highly proliferative and often exhibit genomic instability (Hazan et al. 2002; Henrique et al. 2000; Satoh et al. 2000; Soyer 1991; Steinbeck et al. 1996; Urso et al. 1992). Such an aggressive proliferative state results from the specific expansion of transformed cells with imbalanced signal transduction favoring proliferation while deregulating normal replicative senescence and apoptotic signaling (Bennett 2008). Accordingly, the stringent cell cycle regulatory mechanisms that govern cell proliferation in normal skin tissues are frequently impaired during melanoma development. For instance, proper function of the G1/S checkpoint that restricts cell cycle progression is often lost in melanoma (Sauroja et al. 2000). Similar perturbations in signaling can be traced to specific familial mutations or epigenetic dysregulation that result in the downregulation of tumor suppressor genes that negatively regulate the cell cycle or the upregulation of oncogenic genes that promote cell cycle progression.
Patients afflicted with familial melanoma commonly exhibit conserved mutations in 9p21, a chromosomal locus associated with deregulation of cell cycle control. The 9p21 locus comprises the CDK2NA gene, which encodes p16INK4A and its alternate reading frames p14ARF and p19ARF. These proteins negatively regulate cell cycle progression and contribute to senescence through their control of cell cycle-promoting proteins such as Cyclin D and E and the transcription factor E2F1 (Fig. 7.5) (Bandyopadhyay and Medrano 2000; Ranade et al. 1995). Furthermore, p16INK4A binds to and inhibits the cell cycle-promoting kinase CDK4, with concomitant effects on Rb and its control of E2F in the cell cycle. Germline mutations in CDK2NA have been reported in melanoma (Koh et al. 1995; Ranade et al. 1995) and result in amplified CDK4-mediated signaling, thereby perturbing normal cell cycle control. The increased CDK4 activity observed in melanoma can also result from mutations in the CDK4 gene (Chudnovsky et al. 2005). These perturbations impair proper cell cycle control and appropriate entry of melanocytes into senescence (Bandyopadhyay and Medrano 2000; Haferkamp et al. 2008; Rane et al. 2002).
Mutational perturbation of the alternate reading frame gene product p14ARF also promotes cellular proliferation. Indeed, mutation of ARF has been demonstrated to synergize with RAS mutations in promoting melanoma tumor development (Ha et al. 2007). p14ARF normally contributes to p53 function by targeting and suppressing the p53 negative regulator, Mdm2. Thus, although mutations in p53 are relatively rare in melanoma, its activity can be downregulated by the increased Mdm2 levels induced by mutational silencing of ARF (Freedberg et al. 2008). Of note, there have been few reports on upregulation of Mdm2 or downregulation of p53 expression or activity in melanoma (Bardeesy et al. 2001) (see also Chap. 4). Hence, the precise contribution of p53 to melanoma development remains unclear. Among the possibilities currently being explored is that p53 is partially inactivated, impairing its ability to control cell cycle arrest or apoptotic cues in melanoma.
Enhanced proliferation of melanoma cells can also be elicited by alterations in other negative regulators of cell cycle progression, including Rb. Notably, Rb is silenced in melanoma (Yang et al. 2005) as a result of nonsense mutations or of inactivating phosphorylation of the translated protein (Bartkova et al. 1996; Brantley and Harbour 2000). Loss of Rb function can also contribute to abrogation of melanocyte senescence (Haferkamp et al. 2008).
In addition to genetic mutations, alterations in the epigenetic regulation of core cell cycle and proliferation genes also contribute to melanoma development and progression. Direct modification of chromatin structure, such as by aberrant promoter hypermethylation, results in the CDK2NA silencing reported in multiple melanoma types (Straume et al. 2002; van der Velden et al. 2001). CDKN2A silencing can also be achieved via upregulation of repressor proteins. One example in melanoma is overexpression of the CDKN2A transcriptional repressor Id1 (Healey et al. 2010). Suppression of p16INK4A in melanoma is also mediated by ß-catenin (Delmas et al. 2007). The histone methyltransferase EZH2 has been implicated in the epigenetic repression of the CDK2NA locus and is upregulated in melanoma via a non-canonical NF-kB pathway. Inhibition of this pathway promotes senescence by inducing re-expression of p16INK and p21 (De Donatis et al. 2016).
Recent studies have highlighted the role played by miRNAs in the epigenetic control of melanoma progression (Jukic et al. 2010). Several miRNAs that suppress proliferation are downregulated during melanoma progression, including miR-let-7 and miR-34a. miR-let-7 targets numerous cell cycle proteins, including Cyclin D1/D3/A, and is expressed at lower levels in melanoma compared with nevi (Schultz et al. 2008). Expression of miR-34a, a transcriptional target of p53, is sufficient to induce G1 arrest/senescence and can act as a tumor suppressor by targeting c-Met. However, in melanoma, miR-34a is silenced by aberrant CpG promoter methylation (Lodygin et al. 2008), which derepresses the cell cycle proteins Rb, CDC2, and E2F3, among others (Satzger et al. 2010; Yan et al. 2009). Deregulation of other miRNAs, including miR-210 and miR-15b, have been demonstrated to promote melanoma tumorigenesis (Satzger et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2009) (see also the section on miRNAs and melanoma).
7.4 Therapeutic Targets
The MAPK–MEK–ERK and PTEN–P13K–AKT pathways are recognized to be critical determinants of melanoma development and progression, and an intensive effort is under way to develop inhibitors of components of these pathways (Madhunapantula and Robertson 2009; Meier et al. 2005; Russo et al. 2009). A series of specific inhibitors of BRAFV600E showed impressive results in early clinical trials (Kumar et al. 2004). However, the initial success was tempered by the high incidence of therapy-resistant tumors, limiting the effectiveness of these specific drugs (Flaherty et al. 2010). In recent years, extensive work on the molecular basis for this resistance has pointed to diverse mechanisms, most of which cause amplification of the downstream MAPK signaling pathway and bypass the effects of the BRAFi. One emerging approach to overcome resistance is the use of immunotherapeutic drugs that do not directly target the tumor per se, but instead unleash the anti-tumor immune response. Among these therapies are antibodies to CTLA-4 and PD-1, which overcome the drug-resistant tumor phenotype by blocking inhibitory immune checkpoints. These agents have recently been assessed as first-line therapy or as combination therapies with selective BRAFi or MEKi (Larkin et al. 2015; Menzies and Long 2013).
7.4.1 Overcoming Resistance to Targeted Therapies
To date, the use of single agents as first-line therapy has demonstrated only limited clinical efficacy. This disappointing outcome has been attributed to the unexpected plasticity of tumors, as reflected by their ability to adapt to harsh growth conditions and become resistant to initially effective drugs. The mechanisms for achieving resistance largely center on signal transduction pathways that have been rewired, either by genetic mutation or alteration in epigenetic control (Smalley et al. 2009; Emery et al. 2009).
Although BRAF inhibitors suppress tumor growth, the effect is transient, and the tumor cells eventually develop one or more “salvage” mechanisms that bypass BRAF or MEK inhibition. Such mechanisms include upregulation of activated CRAF activity (Gollob et al. 2006; Hatzivassiliou et al. 2010; Kaplan et al. 2011; Montagut et al. 2008; Paraiso et al. 2010; Tsai et al. 2008; Wellbrock and Hurlstone 2010); mutation of NRAS, which leads to CRAF activation and bypasses BRAF inhibition (Nazarian et al. 2010); upregulation of COT, which activates ERK in a MEK-dependent and RAF-independent manner (Johannessen et al. 2010); and upregulation of RTKs (Nazarian et al. 2010) (see section 7.1.1.2 on RTKs).
Melanomas may also develop resistance to BRAF-targeting therapies via upregulation of AKT3-dependent mechanisms (Shao and Aplin 2010), which is consistent with the reported cooperation between mutant BRAF and active AKT (Dankort et al. 2009). Additionally, resistance to BRAFi can be achieved by alternative splicing of BRAF (Wellbrock et al. 2004), which results in a protein lacking the RAS-binding domain due to a silent mutation in intron 8 (Salton et al. 2015). This BRAF isoform dimerizes even in the presence of low levels of RAS, conferring drug resistance through reactivation of the ERK pathway.
Combined targeting of MEK and BRAF results in additive and synergistic effects on progression-free survival of melanoma patients, with a 67 % response rate and 93 % overall survival at 6 months (Flaherty et al. 2012a; Flaherty et al. 2012b). Nevertheless, resistance to MEKi emerges through the same mechanisms seen in BRAFi resistance, including increased CRAF activity and mutation of both NRAS and MEK1 (Greger et al. 2012).
Most tumor resistance mechanisms result in increased activity of the translation initiation complex, which supports the translation of cancer-driving genes such as oncogenes and cell cycle/DNA damage response genes. Hence, partial disruption of the eIF4F complex is a potential therapeutic strategy for drug-resistant tumors, including melanoma. In support of this approach, recent studies have demonstrated efficacy in overcoming melanoma resistance to therapy by targeting eIF4F with silvestrol and several flavaglines (Boussemart et al. 2014), and by targeting a key component of the eIF4F complex, eIF4G1, with the small molecule SBI-756 (Feng et al. 2015).
7.4.2 Immunotherapy
A great deal of effort has been devoted to the use of immune-based therapies to overcome drug resistance in melanoma (Hu-Lieskovan et al. 2014; Vanneman and Dranoff 2012), but the success rate has been low and pronounced toxicity has been observed in most cases. The notion that the immune system could be manipulated to enable a global attack on tumors was initially met with skepticism, largely due to fears that uncontrolled activation would lead to autoimmunity. However, the pioneering work of Drs. Allison and Honjo introduced the immune checkpoint molecules, CTLA-4 and PD-1, respectively, as new paradigms for cancer immunotherapy (Leach et al. 1996; Okazaki et al. 2013; Peggs et al. 2006). Targeting of CTLA-4 circumvents downregulation of T-cell proliferation, whereas PD-1 blockade is likely to affect both activation of T cells and the direct anti-tumor activity of effector T cells.
Clinical trials with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies have shown unexpected success, with an overall response rate of about 20 %, albeit with notable toxicity (Attia et al. 2005; Hodi et al. 2010). Clinical trials with anti-PD-1 antibodies have achieved greater response rates (30–40 %) and significant increases in patient survival (Topalian et al. 2014). More recently, combination therapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 achieved about 60 % response rate and 79 % 2-year survival rate (Topalian et al. 2014). Other ongoing work includes the evaluation of combination therapies of immune checkpoint blockers with BRAFi or MEKi, which have shown promising results in pre-clinical experiments (Hu-Lieskovan et al. 2015).
7.5 Epilogue
Our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the development, progression, and drug resistance of melanoma has increased significantly in recent years. At the same time, we have come to appreciate that a major obstacle to achieving sustained therapeutic responses is the innate plasticity of tumor cells, which allows them to adapt to harsh conditions, withstand therapy, and acquire metastatic ability. This means that the rewired signaling observed in tumor cells could be further changed by the tumor microenvironment or by stress imposed by the chemotherapeutic drugs. Thus, we must divert from our current approach to cancer therapy—more intense targeting of a mutated pathway—to find new therapeutic modalities. These include fine-tuning the immune checkpoint machinery to enable a concerted immune attack on the tumor, and targeting the central mechanisms that provide a global advantage to the tumors. Among the latter mechanisms are the translation initiation complex and the unfolded protein response, which are cardinal nodes for tumor-driving genes and may offer a more global approach to targeting the plastic tumor. These molecular hubs have already garnered attention and we may expect an exciting new cadre of modulators to reach clinical evaluation in the coming years.
References
Ackermann J, Frutschi M, Kaloulis K, McKee T, Trumpp A, Beermann F (2005) Metastasizing melanoma formation caused by expression of activated N-RasQ61K on an INK4a-deficient background. Cancer Res 65:4005–4011
Anastas JN, Kulikauskas RM, Tamir T, Rizos H, Long GV, von Euw EM, Yang PT, Chen HW, Haydu L, Toroni RA et al (2014) WNT5A enhances resistance of melanoma cells to targeted BRAF inhibitors. J Clin Invest 124:2877–2890
Antonescu CR, Busam KJ, Francone TD, Wong GC, Guo T, Agaram NP, Besmer P, Jungbluth A, Gimbel M, Chen CT et al (2007) L576P KIT mutation in anal melanomas correlates with KIT protein expression and is sensitive to specific kinase inhibition. Int J Cancer 121:257–264
Argast GM, Croy CH, Couts KL, Zhang Z, Litman E, Chan DC, Ahn NG (2009) Plexin B1 is repressed by oncogenic B-Raf signaling and functions as a tumor suppressor in melanoma cells. Oncogene 28:2697–2709
Attia P, Phan GQ, Maker AV, Robinson MR, Quezado MM, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Topalian SL, Kammula US, Royal RE et al (2005) Autoimmunity correlates with tumor regression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. J Clin Oncol 23:6043–6053
Babchia N, Calipel A, Mouriaux F, Faussat AM, Mascarelli F (2010) The PI3K/Akt and mTOR/P70S6K signaling pathways in human uveal melanoma cells: interaction with B-Raf/ERK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:421–429
Ball NJ, Yohn JJ, Morelli JG, Norris DA, Golitz LE, Hoeffler JP (1994) Ras mutations in human melanoma: a marker of malignant progression. J Invest Dermatol 102:285–290
Bandyopadhyay D, Medrano EE (2000) Melanin accumulation accelerates melanocyte senescence by a mechanism involving p16INK4a/CDK4/pRB and E2F1. Ann N Y Acad Sci 908:71–84
Bardeesy N, Bastian BC, Hezel A, Pinkel D, DePinho RA, Chin L (2001) Dual inactivation of RB and p53 pathways in RAS-induced melanomas. Mol Cell Biol 21:2144–2153
Bar-Eli M (1997) Molecular mechanisms of melanoma metastasis. J Cell Physiol 173:275–278
Bartkova J, Lukas J, Guldberg P, Alsner J, Kirkin AF, Zeuthen J, Bartek J (1996) The p16-cyclin D/Cdk4-pRb pathway as a functional unit frequently altered in melanoma pathogenesis. Cancer Res 56:5475–5483
Bennett DC (2008) How to make a melanoma: what do we know of the primary clonal events? Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 21:27–38
Bhaskar PT, Hay N (2007) The two TORCs and Akt. Dev Cell 12:487–502
Bos JL (1989) ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res 49:4682–4689
Boussemart L, Malka-Mahieu H, Girault I, Allard D, Hemmingsson O, Tomasic G, Thomas M, Basmadjian C, Ribeiro N, Thuaud F et al (2014) eIF4F is a nexus of resistance to anti-BRAF and anti-MEK cancer therapies. Nature 513:105–109
Brantley MA Jr, Harbour JW (2000) Inactivation of retinoblastoma protein in uveal melanoma by phosphorylation of sites in the COOH-terminal region. Cancer Res 60:4320–4323
Brauer PM, Tyner AL (2009) RAKing in AKT: a tumor suppressor function for the intracellular tyrosine kinase FRK. Cell Cycle 8:2728–2732
Brummer T, Martin P, Herzog S, Misawa Y, Daly RJ, Reth M (2006) Functional analysis of the regulatory requirements of B-Raf and the B-Raf(V600E) oncoprotein. Oncogene 25:6262–6276
Caramuta S, Egyhazi S, Rodolfo M, Witten D, Hansson J, Larsson C, Lui WO (2010) MicroRNA expression profiles associated with mutational status and survival in malignant melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 130:2062–2070
Cardone MH, Roy N, Stennicke HR, Salvesen GS, Franke TF, Stanbridge E, Frisch S, Reed JC (1998) Regulation of cell death protease caspase-9 by phosphorylation. Science 282:1318–1321
Chen M (2010) Smoke and miRrors: pseudogenes tricking miRNAs. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 23(5):583–584
Chien AJ, Moore EC, Lonsdorf AS, Kulikauskas RM, Rothberg BG, Berger AJ, Major MB, Hwang ST, Rimm DL, Moon RT (2009) Activated Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in melanoma is associated with decreased proliferation in patient tumors and a murine melanoma model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:1193–1198
Chin L, Pomerantz J, Polsky D, Jacobson M, Cohen C, Cordon-Cardo C, Horner JW 2nd, DePinho RA (1997) Cooperative effects of INK4a and ras in melanoma susceptibility in vivo. Genes Dev 11:2822–2834
Chin L, Garraway LA, Fisher DE (2006) Malignant melanoma: genetics and therapeutics in the genomic era. Genes Dev 20:2149–2182
Chudnovsky Y, Adams AE, Robbins PB, Lin Q, Khavari PA (2005) Use of human tissue to assess the oncogenic activity of melanoma-associated mutations. Nat Genet 37:745–749
Conde-Perez A, Gros G, Longvert C, Pedersen M, Petit V, Aktary Z, Viros A, Gesbert F, Delmas V, Rambow F et al (2015) A caveolin-dependent and PI3K/AKT-independent role of PTEN in beta-catenin transcriptional activity. Nat Commun 6:8093
Corcoran RB, Ebi H, Turke AB, Coffee EM, Nishino M, Cogdill AP, Brown RD, Della Pelle P, Dias-Santagata D, Hung KE et al (2012) EGFR-mediated re-activation of MAPK signaling contributes to insensitivity of BRAF mutant colorectal cancers to RAF inhibition with vemurafenib. Cancer Discov 2:227–235
Dai DL, Martinka M, Li G (2005) Prognostic significance of activated Akt expression in melanoma: a clinicopathologic study of 292 cases. J Clin Oncol 23:1473–1482
Dankort D, Curley DP, Cartlidge RA, Nelson B, Karnezis AN, Damsky WE Jr, You MJ, DePinho RA, McMahon M, Bosenberg M (2009) Braf(V600E) cooperates with Pten loss to induce metastatic melanoma. Nat Genet 41:544–552
Datta SR, Dudek H, Tao X, Masters S, Fu H, Gotoh Y, Greenberg ME (1997) Akt phosphorylation of BAD couples survival signals to the cell-intrinsic death machinery. Cell 91:231–241
Datta SR, Brunet A, Greenberg ME (1999) Cellular survival: a play in three Akts. Genes Dev 13:2905–2927
Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, Teague J, Woffendin H, Garnett MJ, Bottomley W et al (2002) Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417:949–954
Davies MA, Stemke-Hale K, Tellez C, Calderone TL, Deng W, Prieto VG, Lazar AJ, Gershenwald JE, Mills GB (2008) A novel AKT3 mutation in melanoma tumours and cell lines. Br J Cancer 99:1265–1268
De Donatis GM, Pape EL, Pierron A, Cheli Y, Hofman V, Hofman P, Allegra M, Zahaf K, Bahadoran P, Rocchi S et al (2016) NF-kB2 induces senescence bypass in melanoma via a direct transcriptional activation of EZH2. Oncogene 35(21):2735–2745
Delmas V, Beermann F, Martinozzi S, Carreira S, Ackermann J, Kumasaka M, Denat L, Goodall J, Luciani F, Viros A et al (2007) Beta-catenin induces immortalization of melanocytes by suppressing p16INK4a expression and cooperates with N-Ras in melanoma development. Genes Dev 21:2923–2935
Denoyelle C, Abou-Rjaily G, Bezrookove V, Verhaegen M, Johnson TM, Fullen DR, Pointer JN, Gruber SB, Su LD, Nikiforov MA et al (2006) Anti-oncogenic role of the endoplasmic reticulum differentially activated by mutations in the MAPK pathway. Nat Cell Biol 8:1053–1063
Dhillon AS, Hagan S, Rath O, Kolch W (2007) MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Oncogene 26:3279–3290
Doglioni C, Piccinin S, Demontis S, Cangi MG, Pecciarini L, Chiarelli C, Armellin M, Vukosavljevic T, Boiocchi M, Maestro R (2003) Alterations of beta-catenin pathway in non-melanoma skin tumors: loss of alpha-ABC nuclear reactivity correlates with the presence of beta-catenin gene mutation. Am J Pathol 163:2277–2287
Dorsky RI, Raible DW, Moon RT (2000) Direct regulation of nacre, a zebrafish MITF homolog required for pigment cell formation, by the Wnt pathway. Genes Dev 14:158–162
Dumaz N, Hayward R, Martin J, Ogilvie L, Hedley D, Curtin JA, Bastian BC, Springer C, Marais R (2006) In melanoma, RAS mutations are accompanied by switching signaling from BRAF to CRAF and disrupted cyclic AMP signaling. Cancer Res 66:9483–9491
Eichhoff OM, Zipser MC, Xu M, Weeraratna AT, Mihic D, Dummer R, Hoek KS (2010) The immunohistochemistry of invasive and proliferative phenotype switching in melanoma: a case report. Melanoma Res 20:349–355
Emery CM, Vijayendran KG, Zipser MC, Sawyer AM, Niu L, Kim JJ, Hatton C, Chopra R, Oberholzer PA, Karpova MB et al (2009) MEK1 mutations confer resistance to MEK and B-RAF inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:20411–20416
Emuss V, Garnett M, Mason C, Marais R (2005) Mutations of C-RAF are rare in human cancer because C-RAF has a low basal kinase activity compared with B-RAF. Cancer Res 65:9719–9726
Esteve-Puig R, Canals F, Colome N, Merlino G, Recio JA (2009) Uncoupling of the LKB1-AMPKalpha energy sensor pathway by growth factors and oncogenic BRAF. PLoS One 4:e4771
Fargnoli MC, Gandini S, Peris K, Maisonneuve P, Raimondi S (2010) MC1R variants increase melanoma risk in families with CDKN2A mutations: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 46:1413–1420
Fecher LA, Cummings SD, Keefe MJ, Alani RM (2007) Toward a molecular classification of melanoma. J Clin Oncol 25:1606–1620
Felicetti F, Errico MC, Segnalini P, Mattia G, Care A (2008) MicroRNA-221 and −222 pathway controls melanoma progression. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8:1759–1765
Feng Y, Pinkerton A, Hulea L, Zhang T, Davies M, Grotegut S, Cheli Y, Yin H, Lau E, Kim H et al (2015) SBI-0640756 attenuates the growth of clinically unresponsive melanomas by disrupting the eIF4F translation initiation complex. Cancer Res 75(24):5211–5218
Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, Ribas A, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, O’Dwyer PJ, Lee RJ, Grippo JF, Nolop K et al (2010) Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 363:809–819
Flaherty KT, Infante JR, Daud A, Gonzalez R, Kefford RF, Sosman J, Hamid O, Schuchter L, Cebon J, Ibrahim N et al (2012a) Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med 367:1694–1703
Flaherty KT, Robert C, Hersey P, Nathan P, Garbe C, Milhem M, Demidov LV, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, Mohr P et al (2012b) Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med 367:107–114
Freedberg DE, Rigas SH, Russak J, Gai W, Kaplow M, Osman I, Turner F, Randerson-Moor JA, Houghton A, Busam K et al (2008) Frequent p16-independent inactivation of p14ARF in human melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:784–795
Gewinner C, Wang ZC, Richardson A, Teruya-Feldstein J, Etemadmoghadam D, Bowtell D, Barretina J, Lin WM, Rameh L, Salmena L, Pandolfi PP and Cantley LC. (2009) Evidence that inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II is a tumor suppressor that inhibits PI3K signaling. Cancer Cell 16(2):115–125
Giehl KA, Nagele U, Volkenandt M, Berking C (2007) Protein expression of melanocyte growth factors (bFGF, SCF) and their receptors (FGFR-1, c-kit) in nevi and melanoma. J Cutan Pathol 34:7–14
Girotti MR, Pedersen M, Sanchez-Laorden B, Viros A, Turajlic S, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Zambon A, Sinclair J, Hayes A, Gore M et al (2013) Inhibiting EGF receptor or SRC family kinase signaling overcomes BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma. Cancer Discov 3:158–167
Goel VK, Lazar AJ, Warneke CL, Redston MS, Haluska FG (2006) Examination of mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and PTEN in primary cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 126:154–160
Gollob JA, Wilhelm S, Carter C, Kelley SL (2006) Role of Raf kinase in cancer: therapeutic potential of targeting the Raf/MEK/ERK signal transduction pathway. Semin Oncol 33:392–406
Goodall J, Martinozzi S, Dexter TJ, Champeval D, Carreira S, Larue L, Goding CR (2004a) Brn-2 expression controls melanoma proliferation and is directly regulated by beta-catenin. Mol Cell Biol 24:2915–2922
Goodall J, Wellbrock C, Dexter TJ, Roberts K, Marais R, Goding CR (2004b) The Brn-2 transcription factor links activated BRAF to melanoma proliferation. Mol Cell Biol 24:2923–2931
Goodall J, Carreira S, Denat L, Kobi D, Davidson I, Nuciforo P, Sturm RA, Larue L, Goding CR (2008) Brn-2 represses microphthalmia-associated transcription factor expression and marks a distinct subpopulation of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor-negative melanoma cells. Cancer Res 68:7788–7794
Govindarajan B, Bai X, Cohen C, Zhong H, Kilroy S, Louis G, Moses M, Arbiser JL (2003) Malignant transformation of melanocytes to melanoma by constitutive activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAPKK) signaling. J Biol Chem 278:9790–9795
Govindarajan B, Sligh JE, Vincent BJ, Li M, Canter JA, Nickoloff BJ, Rodenburg RJ, Smeitink JA, Oberley L, Zhang Y et al (2007) Overexpression of Akt converts radial growth melanoma to vertical growth melanoma. J Clin Invest 117:719–729
Greger JG, Eastman SD, Zhang V, Bleam MR, Hughes AM, Smitheman KN, Dickerson SH, Laquerre SG, Liu L, Gilmer TM (2012) Combinations of BRAF, MEK, and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors overcome acquired resistance to the BRAF inhibitor GSK2118436 dabrafenib, mediated by NRAS or MEK mutations. Mol Cancer Ther 11:909–920
Ha L, Ichikawa T, Anver M, Dickins R, Lowe S, Sharpless NE, Krimpenfort P, Depinho RA, Bennett DC, Sviderskaya EV et al (2007) ARF functions as a melanoma tumor suppressor by inducing p53-independent senescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:10968–10973
Haferkamp S, Becker TM, Scurr LL, Kefford RF, Rizos H (2008) p16INK4a-induced senescence is disabled by melanoma-associated mutations. Aging Cell 7:733–745
Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, Brandhuber BJ, Anderson DJ, Alvarado R, Ludlam MJ, Stokoe D, Gloor SL, Vigers G et al (2010) RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature 464:431–435
Hazan C, Melzer K, Panageas KS, Li E, Kamino H, Kopf A, Cordon-Cardo C, Osman I, Polsky D (2002) Evaluation of the proliferation marker MIB-1 in the prognosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Cancer 95:634–640
Healey MA, Deaton SL, Alder JK, Winnepenninckx V, Casero RA Jr, Herman JG (2010) Id1 overexpression is independent of repression and epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes in melanoma. Epigenetics 5:410–421
Henrique R, Azevedo R, Bento MJ, Domingues JC, Silva C, Jeronimo C (2000) Prognostic value of Ki-67 expression in localized cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 43:991–1000
Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, Gonzalez R, Robert C, Schadendorf D, Hassel JC et al (2010) Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 363:711–723
Houben R, Becker JC, Kappel A, Terheyden P, Brocker EB, Goetz R, Rapp UR (2004) Constitutive activation of the Ras-Raf signaling pathway in metastatic melanoma is associated with poor prognosis. J Carcinog 3:6
Huang S, Luca M, Gutman M, McConkey DJ, Langley KE, Lyman SD, Bar-Eli M (1996) Enforced c-KIT expression renders highly metastatic human melanoma cells susceptible to stem cell factor-induced apoptosis and inhibits their tumorigenic and metastatic potential. Oncogene 13:2339–2347
Hu-Lieskovan S, Robert L, Homet Moreno B, Ribas A (2014) Combining targeted therapy with immunotherapy in BRAF-mutant melanoma: promise and challenges. J Clin Oncol 32:2248–2254
Hu-Lieskovan S, Mok S, Homet Moreno B, Tsoi J, Robert L, Goedert L, Pinheiro EM, Koya RC, Graeber TG, Comin-Anduix B et al (2015) Improved antitumor activity of immunotherapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E) melanoma. Sci Transl Med 7:279ra241
Hunt G, Kyne S, Wakamatsu K, Ito S, Thody AJ (1995) Nle4DPhe7 alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone increases the eumelanin:phaeomelanin ratio in cultured human melanocytes. J Invest Dermatol 104:83–85
Huntington JT, Shields JM, Der CJ, Wyatt CA, Benbow U, Slingluff CL Jr, Brinckerhoff CE (2004) Overexpression of collagenase 1 (MMP-1) is mediated by the ERK pathway in invasive melanoma cells: role of BRAF mutation and fibroblast growth factor signaling. J Biol Chem 279:33168–33176
Inoue-Narita T, Hamada K, Sasaki T, Hatakeyama S, Fujita S, Kawahara K, Sasaki M, Kishimoto H, Eguchi S, Kojima I et al (2008) Pten deficiency in melanocytes results in resistance to hair graying and susceptibility to carcinogen-induced melanomagenesis. Cancer Res 68:5760–5768
Jafari M, Papp T, Kirchner S, Diener U, Henschler D, Burg G, Schiffmann D (1995) Analysis of ras mutations in human melanocytic lesions: activation of the ras gene seems to be associated with the nodular type of human malignant melanoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 121:23–30
Janku F, Novotny J, Julis I, Julisova I, Pecen L, Tomancova V, Kocmanova G, Krasna L, Krajsova I, Stork J et al (2005) KIT receptor is expressed in more than 50% of early-stage malignant melanoma: a retrospective study of 261 patients. Melanoma Res 15:251–256
Ji Z, Erin Chen Y, Kumar R, Taylor M, Jenny Njauw CN, Miao B, Frederick DT, Wargo JA, Flaherty KT, Jonsson G et al (2015) MITF modulates therapeutic resistance through EGFR signaling. J Invest Dermatol 135:1863–1872
Jiang CC, Lucas K, Avery-Kiejda KA, Wade M, deBock CE, Thorne RF, Allen J, Hersey P, Zhang XD (2008) Up-regulation of Mcl-1 is critical for survival of human melanoma cells upon endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cancer Res 68:6708–6717
Jiveskog S, Ragnarsson-Olding B, Platz A, Ringborg U (1998) N-ras mutations are common in melanomas from sun-exposed skin of humans but rare in mucosal membranes or unexposed skin. J Invest Dermatol 111:757–761
Johannessen CM, Boehm JS, Kim SY, Thomas SR, Wardwell L, Johnson LA, Emery CM, Stransky N, Cogdill AP, Barretina J et al (2010) COT drives resistance to RAF inhibition through MAP kinase pathway reactivation. Nature 468:968–972
Jukic DM, Rao UN, Kelly L, Skaf JS, Drogowski LM, Kirkwood JM, Panelli MC (2010) Microrna profiling analysis of differences between the melanoma of young adults and older adults. J Transl Med 8:27
Kadekaro AL, Kanto H, Kavanagh R, Abdel-Malek ZA (2003) Significance of the melanocortin 1 receptor in regulating human melanocyte pigmentation, proliferation, and survival. Ann N Y Acad Sci 994:359–365
Kaplan FM, Shao Y, Mayberry MM, Aplin AE (2011) Hyperactivation of MEK-ERK1/2 signaling and resistance to apoptosis induced by the oncogenic B-RAF inhibitor, PLX4720, in mutant N-RAS melanoma cells. Oncogene 30(3):366–371
Karasic TB, Hei TK, Ivanov VN (2010) Disruption of IGF-1R signaling increases TRAIL-induced apoptosis: a new potential therapy for the treatment of melanoma. Exp Cell Res 316:1994–2007
Karreth FA, Reschke M, Ruocco A, Ng C, Chapuy B, Leopold V, Sjoberg M, Keane TM, Verma A, Ala U et al (2015) The BRAF pseudogene functions as a competitive endogenous RNA and induces lymphoma in vivo. Cell 161:319–332
Kim D, Kim S, Koh H, Yoon SO, Chung AS, Cho KS, Chung J (2001) Akt/PKB promotes cancer cell invasion via increased motility and metalloproteinase production. FASEB J 15:1953–1962
Kim RD, Curtin JA, Bastian BC (2008a) Lack of somatic alterations of MC1R in primary melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 21:579–582
Kim SS, Yoo NJ, Jeong EG, Kim MS, Lee SH (2008b) Expression of NEDD4-1, a PTEN regulator, in gastric and colorectal carcinomas. APMIS 116:779–784
Kim H, Frederick DT, Levesque MP, Cooper ZA, Feng Y, Krepler C, Brill L, Samuels Y, Hayward NK, Perlina A et al (2015) Downregulation of the ubiquitin ligase RNF125 underlies resistance of melanoma cells to BRAF inhibitors via JAK1 deregulation. Cell Rep 11:1458–1473
Koh J, Enders GH, Dynlacht BD, Harlow E (1995) Tumour-derived p16 alleles encoding proteins defective in cell-cycle inhibition. Nature 375:506–510
Konieczkowski DJ, Johannessen CM, Abudayyeh O, Kim JW, Cooper ZA, Piris A, Frederick DT, Barzily-Rokni M, Straussman R, Haq R et al (2014) A melanoma cell state distinction influences sensitivity to MAPK pathway inhibitors. Cancer Discov 4:816–827
Kortylewski M, Heinrich PC, Kauffmann ME, Bohm M, MacKiewicz A, Behrmann I (2001) Mitogen-activated protein kinases control p27/Kip1 expression and growth of human melanoma cells. Biochem J 357:297–303
Kumar R, Angelini S, Snellman E, Hemminki K (2004) BRAF mutations are common somatic events in melanocytic nevi. J Invest Dermatol 122:342–348
Kusters-Vandevelde HV, Klaasen A, Kusters B, Groenen PJ, van Engen-van Grunsven IA, van Dijk MR, Reifenberger G, Wesseling P, Blokx WA (2010) Activating mutations of the GNAQ gene: a frequent event in primary melanocytic neoplasms of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 119(3):317–323
Lamba S, Felicioni L, Buttitta F, Bleeker FE, Malatesta S, Corbo V, Scarpa A, Rodolfo M, Knowles M, Frattini M et al (2010) Mutational profile of GNAQQ209 in human tumors. PLoS One 4:e6833
Landi MT, Bauer J, Pfeiffer RM, Elder DE, Hulley B, Minghetti P, Calista D, Kanetsky PA, Pinkel D, Bastian BC (2006) MC1R germline variants confer risk for BRAF-mutant melanoma. Science 313:521–522
Lang J, Boxer M, MacKie R (2003) Absence of exon 15 BRAF germline mutations in familial melanoma. Hum Mutat 21:327–330
Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Smylie M, Rutkowski P et al (2015) Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med 373:23–34
Larue L, Delmas V (2006) The WNT/Beta-catenin pathway in melanoma. Front Biosci 11:733–742
Leach DR, Krummel MF, Allison JP (1996) Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade. Science 271:1734–1736
Lee JW, Soung YH, Kim SY, Park WS, Nam SW, Min WS, Kim SH, Lee JY, Yoo NJ, Lee SH (2005) Mutational analysis of the ARAF gene in human cancers. APMIS 113:54–57
Levine AJ, Feng Z, Mak TW, You H, Jin S (2006) Coordination and communication between the p53 and IGF-1-AKT-TOR signal transduction pathways. Genes Dev 20:267–275
Lodygin D, Tarasov V, Epanchintsev A, Berking C, Knyazeva T, Korner H, Knyazev P, Diebold J, Hermeking H (2008) Inactivation of miR-34a by aberrant CpG methylation in multiple types of cancer. Cell Cycle 7:2591–2600
Lopez-Bergami P, Huang C, Goydos JS, Yip D, Bar-Eli M, Herlyn M, Smalley KS, Mahale A, Eroshkin A, Aaronson S et al (2007) Rewired ERK-JNK signaling pathways in melanoma. Cancer Cell 11:447–460
Lopez-Bergami P, Kim H, Dewing A, Goydos J, Aaronson S, Ronai Z (2010) c-Jun regulates phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 transcription: implication for Akt and protein kinase C activities and melanoma tumorigenesis. J Biol Chem 285:903–913
Macaulay VM, Salisbury AJ, Bohula EA, Playford MP, Smorodinsky NI, Shiloh Y (2001) Downregulation of the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor in mouse melanoma cells is associated with enhanced radiosensitivity and impaired activation of Atm kinase. Oncogene 20:4029–4040
Madhunapantula SV, Robertson GP (2009) The PTEN-AKT3 signaling cascade as a therapeutic target in melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 22:400–419
Mallikarjuna K, Pushparaj V, Biswas J, Krishnakumar S (2006) Expression of insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R), c-Fos, and c-Jun in uveal melanoma: an immunohistochemical study. Curr Eye Res 31:875–883
Maloney EK, McLaughlin JL, Dagdigian NE, Garrett LM, Connors KM, Zhou XM, Blattler WA, Chittenden T, Singh R (2003) An anti-insulin-like growth factor I receptor antibody that is a potent inhibitor of cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Res 63:5073–5083
Mattei S, Colombo MP, Melani C, Silvani A, Parmiani G, Herlyn M (1994) Expression of cytokine/growth factors and their receptors in human melanoma and melanocytes. Int J Cancer 56:853–857
Meier F, Schittek B, Busch S, Garbe C, Smalley K, Satyamoorthy K, Li G, Herlyn M (2005) The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways present molecular targets for the effective treatment of advanced melanoma. Front Biosci 10:2986–3001
Menzies AM, Long GV (2013) New combinations and immunotherapies for melanoma: latest evidence and clinical utility. Ther Adv Med Oncol 5:278–285
Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Soengas MS, Denoyelle C, Kuilman T, van der Horst CM, Majoor DM, Shay JW, Mooi WJ, Peeper DS (2005) BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi. Nature 436:720–724
Mirmohammadsadegh A, Marini A, Nambiar S, Hassan M, Tannapfel A, Ruzicka T, Hengge UR (2006) Epigenetic silencing of the PTEN gene in melanoma. Cancer Res 66:6546–6552
Mitra D, Luo X, Morgan A, Wang J, Hoang MP, Lo J, Guerrero CR, Lennerz JK, Mihm MC, Wargo JA et al (2012) An ultraviolet-radiation-independent pathway to melanoma carcinogenesis in the red hair/fair skin background. Nature 491:449–453
Montagut C, Sharma SV, Shioda T, McDermott U, Ulman M, Ulkus LE, Dias-Santagata D, Stubbs H, Lee DY, Singh A et al (2008) Elevated CRAF as a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to BRAF inhibition in melanoma. Cancer Res 68:4853–4861
Montone KT, van Belle P, Elenitsas R, Elder DE (1997) Proto-oncogene c-kit expression in malignant melanoma: protein loss with tumor progression. Mod Pathol 10:939–944
Mountjoy KG, Robbins LS, Mortrud MT, Cone RD (1992) The cloning of a family of genes that encode the melanocortin receptors. Science 257:1248–1251
Muller J, Krijgsman O, Tsoi J, Robert L, Hugo W, Song C, Kong X, Possik PA, Cornelissen-Steijger PD, Foppen MH et al (2014) Low MITF/AXL ratio predicts early resistance to multiple targeted drugs in melanoma. Nat Commun 5:5712
Murugan AK, Dong J, Xie J, Xing M (2009) MEK1 mutations, but not ERK2 mutations, occur in melanomas and colon carcinomas, but none in thyroid carcinomas. Cell Cycle 8:2122–2124
Natali PG, Nicotra MR, Winkler AB, Cavaliere R, Bigotti A, Ullrich A (1992) Progression of human cutaneous melanoma is associated with loss of expression of c-kit proto-oncogene receptor. Int J Cancer 52:197–201
Natali PG, Nicotra MR, Di Renzo MF, Prat M, Bigotti A, Cavaliere R, Comoglio PM (1993) Expression of the c-Met/HGF receptor in human melanocytic neoplasms: demonstration of the relationship to malignant melanoma tumour progression. Br J Cancer 68:746–750
Nateri AS, Riera-Sans L, Da Costa C, Behrens A (2004) The ubiquitin ligase SCFFbw7 antagonizes apoptotic JNK signaling. Science 303:1374–1378
Nazarian R, Shi H, Wang Q, Kong X, Koya RC, Lee H, Chen Z, Lee MK, Attar N, Sazegar H et al (2010) Melanomas acquire resistance to B-RAF(V600E) inhibition by RTK or N-RAS upregulation. Nature 468:973–977
Ohanna M, Giuliano S, Bonet C, Imbert V, Hofman V, Zangari J, Bille K, Robert C, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Hofman P et al (2011) Senescent cells develop a PARP-1 and nuclear factor-{kappa}B-associated secretome (PNAS). Genes Dev 25:1245–1261
Ohanna M, Cheli Y, Bonet C, Bonazzi VF, Allegra M, Giuliano S, Bille K, Bahadoran P, Giacchero D, Lacour JP et al (2013) Secretome from senescent melanoma engages the STAT3 pathway to favor reprogramming of naive melanoma towards a tumor-initiating cell phenotype. Oncotarget 4:2212–2224
Okazaki T, Chikuma S, Iwai Y, Fagarasan S, Honjo T (2013) A rheostat for immune responses: the unique properties of PD-1 and their advantages for clinical application. Nat Immunol 14:1212–1218
Paccez JD, Vogelsang M, Parker MI, Zerbini LF (2014) The receptor tyrosine kinase Axl in cancer: biological functions and therapeutic implications. Int J Cancer 134:1024–1033
Paraiso KH, Fedorenko IV, Cantini LP, Munko AC, Hall M, Sondak VK, Messina JL, Flaherty KT, Smalley KS (2010) Recovery of phospho-ERK activity allows melanoma cells to escape from BRAF inhibitor therapy. Br J Cancer 102:1724–1730
Parmiter AH, Balaban G, Clark WH Jr, Nowell PC (1988) Possible involvement of the chromosome region 10q24----q26 in early stages of melanocytic neoplasia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 30:313–317
Patton EE, Widlund HR, Kutok JL, Kopani KR, Amatruda JF, Murphey RD, Berghmans S, Mayhall EA, Traver D, Fletcher CD et al (2005) BRAF mutations are sufficient to promote nevi formation and cooperate with p53 in the genesis of melanoma. Curr Biol 15:249–254
Pavey SJ, Cummings MC, Whiteman DC, Castellano M, Walsh MD, Gabrielli BG, Green A, Hayward NK (2002) Loss of p16 expression is associated with histological features of melanoma invasion. Melanoma Res 12:539–547
Peggs KS, Quezada SA, Korman AJ, Allison JP (2006) Principles and use of anti-CTLA4 antibody in human cancer immunotherapy. Curr Opin Immunol 18:206–213
Pleasance ED, Cheetham RK, Stephens PJ, McBride DJ, Humphray SJ, Greenman CD, Varela I, Lin ML, Ordonez GR, Bignell GR et al (2010) A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature 463:191–196
Ploper D, Taelman VF, Robert L, Perez BS, Titz B, Chen HW, Graeber TG, von Euw E, Ribas A, De Robertis EM (2015) MITF drives endolysosomal biogenesis and potentiates Wnt signaling in melanoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E420–E429
Poliseno L, Salmena L, Zhang J, Carver B, Haveman WJ, Pandolfi PP (2010) A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology. Nature 465:1033–1038
Pollock PM, Walker GJ, Glendening JM, Que Noy T, Bloch NC, Fountain JW, Hayward NK (2002) PTEN inactivation is rare in melanoma tumours but occurs frequently in melanoma cell lines. Melanoma Res 12:565–575
Primot A, Mogha A, Corre S, Roberts K, Debbache J, Adamski H, Dreno B, Khammari A, Lesimple T, Mereau A et al (2010) ERK-regulated differential expression of the Mitf 6a/b splicing isoforms in melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 23:93–102
Puri N, Ahmed S, Janamanchi V, Tretiakova M, Zumba O, Krausz T, Jagadeeswaran R, Salgia R (2007) c-Met is a potentially new therapeutic target for treatment of human melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:2246–2253
Ranade K, Hussussian CJ, Sikorski RS, Varmus HE, Goldstein AM, Tucker MA, Serrano M, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Dracopoli NC (1995) Mutations associated with familial melanoma impair p16INK4 function. Nat Genet 10:114–116
Rane SG, Cosenza SC, Mettus RV, Reddy EP (2002) Germ line transmission of the Cdk4(R24C) mutation facilitates tumorigenesis and escape from cellular senescence. Mol Cell Biol 22:644–656
Resnicoff M, Coppola D, Sell C, Rubin R, Ferrone S, Baserga R (1994) Growth inhibition of human melanoma cells in nude mice by antisense strategies to the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor. Cancer Res 54:4848–4850
Rivera RS, Nagatsuka H, Gunduz M, Cengiz B, Gunduz E, Siar CH, Tsujigiwa H, Tamamura R, Han KN, Nagai N (2008) C-kit protein expression correlated with activating mutations in KIT gene in oral mucosal melanoma. Virchows Arch 452:27–32
Robertson GP (2005) Functional and therapeutic significance of Akt deregulation in malignant melanoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev 24:273–285
Robinson SJ, Healy E (2002) Human melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene variants alter melanoma cell growth and adhesion to extracellular matrix. Oncogene 21:8037–8046
Rouzaud F, Costin GE, Yamaguchi Y, Valencia JC, Berens WF, Chen KG, Hoashi T, Bohm M, Abdel-Malek ZA, Hearing VJ (2006) Regulation of constitutive and UVR-induced skin pigmentation by melanocortin 1 receptor isoforms. FASEB J 20:1927–1929
Rusciano D, Lorenzoni P, Burger MM (1995) Expression of constitutively activated hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor receptor (c-met) in B16 melanoma cells selected for enhanced liver colonization. Oncogene 11:1979–1987
Rusciano D, Lorenzoni P, Burger MM (1999) Regulation of c-met expression in B16 murine melanoma cells by melanocyte stimulating hormone. J Cell Sci 112(Pt 5):623–630
Russo AE, Torrisi E, Bevelacqua Y, Perrotta R, Libra M, McCubrey JA, Spandidos DA, Stivala F, Malaponte G (2009) Melanoma: molecular pathogenesis and emerging target therapies (review). Int J Oncol 34:1481–1489
Salton M, Kasprzak WK, Voss T, Shapiro BA, Poulikakos PI, Misteli T (2015) Inhibition of vemurafenib-resistant melanoma by interference with pre-mRNA splicing. Nat Commun 6:7103
Satoh S, Hashimoto-Tamaoki T, Furuyama J, Mihara K, Namba M, Kitano Y (2000) High frequency of tetraploidy detected in malignant melanoma of Japanese patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Int J Oncol 17:707–715
Satyamoorthy K, Li G, Vaidya B, Patel D, Herlyn M (2001) Insulin-like growth factor-1 induces survival and growth of biologically early melanoma cells through both the mitogen-activated protein kinase and beta-catenin pathways. Cancer Res 61:7318–7324
Satzger I, Mattern A, Kuettler U, Weinspach D, Voelker B, Kapp A, Gutzmer R (2010) MicroRNA-15b represents an independent prognostic parameter and is correlated with tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis in malignant melanoma. Int J Cancer 126:2553–2562
Sauroja I, Smeds J, Vlaykova T, Kumar R, Talve L, Hahka-Kemppinen M, Punnonen K, Jansen CT, Hemminki K, Pyrhonen S (2000) Analysis of G(1)/S checkpoint regulators in metastatic melanoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 28:404–414
Schepsky A, Bruser K, Gunnarsson GJ, Goodall J, Hallsson JH, Goding CR, Steingrimsson E, Hecht A (2006) The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor Mitf interacts with beta-catenin to determine target gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 26:8914–8927
Schultz J, Lorenz P, Gross G, Ibrahim S, Kunz M (2008) MicroRNA let-7b targets important cell cycle molecules in malignant melanoma cells and interferes with anchorage-independent growth. Cell Res 18:549–557
Scortegagna M, Ruller C, Feng Y, Lazova R, Kluger H, Li JL, De SK, Rickert R, Pellecchia M, Bosenberg M et al (2014) Genetic inactivation or pharmacological inhibition of Pdk1 delays development and inhibits metastasis of Braf(V600E)::Pten(−/−) melanoma. Oncogene 33:4330–4339
Scortegagna M, Lau E, Zhang T, Feng Y, Sereduk C, Yin H, De SK, Meeth K, Platt JT, Langdon CG et al (2015) PDK1 and SGK3 contribute to the growth of BRAF-mutant melanomas and are potential therapeutic targets. Cancer Res 75:1399–1412
Scott MC, Wakamatsu K, Ito S, Kadekaro AL, Kobayashi N, Groden J, Kavanagh R, Takakuwa T, Virador V, Hearing VJ et al (2002) Human melanocortin 1 receptor variants, receptor function and melanocyte response to UV radiation. J Cell Sci 115:2349–2355
Sensi M, Catani M, Castellano G, Nicolini G, Alciato F, Tragni G, De Santis G, Bersani I, Avanzi G, Tomassetti A et al (2011) Human cutaneous melanomas lacking MITF and melanocyte differentiation antigens express a functional Axl receptor kinase. J Invest Dermatol 131:2448–2457
Shao Y, Aplin AE (2010) Akt3-mediated resistance to apoptosis in B-RAF-targeted melanoma cells. Cancer Res 70:6670–6681
Sheridan C, Brumatti G, Martin SJ (2008) Oncogenic B-RafV600E inhibits apoptosis and promotes ERK-dependent inactivation of Bad and Bim. J Biol Chem 283:22128–22135
Shukla VK, Hughes DC, Hughes LE, McCormick F, Padua RA (1989) ras mutations in human melanotic lesions: K-ras activation is a frequent and early event in melanoma development. Oncogene Res 5:121–127
Smalley KS, Nathanson KL, Flaherty KT (2009) Genetic subgrouping of melanoma reveals new opportunities for targeted therapy. Cancer Res 69:3241–3244
Song X, Mosby N, Yang J, Xu A, Abdel-Malek Z, Kadekaro AL (2009) alpha-MSH activates immediate defense responses to UV-induced oxidative stress in human melanocytes. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 22:809–818
Soyer HP (1991) Ki 67 immunostaining in melanocytic skin tumors. Correlation with histologic parameters. J Cutan Pathol 18:264–272
Spofford LS, Abel EV, Boisvert-Adamo K, Aplin AE (2006) Cyclin D3 expression in melanoma cells is regulated by adhesion-dependent phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling and contributes to G1-S progression. J Biol Chem 281:25644–25651
Spranger S, Bao R, Gajewski TF (2015) Melanoma-intrinsic beta-catenin signalling prevents anti-tumour immunity. Nature 523:231–235
Stahl JM, Sharma A, Cheung M, Zimmerman M, Cheng JQ, Bosenberg MW, Kester M, Sandirasegarane L, Robertson GP (2004) Deregulated Akt3 activity promotes development of malignant melanoma. Cancer Res 64:7002–7010
Steinbeck ZR, Heselmeyer KM, Gerlach B, Bjornhagen V, Auer GU (1996) Diagnostic impact of nuclear DNA content and proliferative activity in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. Melanoma Res 6:37–43
Straume O, Smeds J, Kumar R, Hemminki K, Akslen LA (2002) Significant impact of promoter hypermethylation and the 540 C > T polymorphism of CDKN2A in cutaneous melanoma of the vertical growth phase. Am J Pathol 161:229–237
Sumimoto H, Imabayashi F, Iwata T, Kawakami Y (2006) The BRAF-MAPK signaling pathway is essential for cancer-immune evasion in human melanoma cells. J Exp Med 203:1651–1656
Sun C, Wang L, Huang S, Heynen GJ, Prahallad A, Robert C, Haanen J, Blank C, Wesseling J, Willems SM et al (2014) Reversible and adaptive resistance to BRAF(V600E) inhibition in melanoma. Nature 508:118–122
Suzuki I, Cone RD, Im S, Nordlund J, Abdel-Malek ZA (1996) Binding of melanotropic hormones to the melanocortin receptor MC1R on human melanocytes stimulates proliferation and melanogenesis. Endocrinology 137:1627–1633
Takeda K, Yasumoto K, Takada R, Takada S, Watanabe K, Udono T, Saito H, Takahashi K, Shibahara S (2000) Induction of melanocyte-specific microphthalmia-associated transcription factor by Wnt-3a. J Biol Chem 275:14013–14016
Takeuchi T, Adachi Y, Sonobe H, Furihata M, Ohtsuki Y (2006) A ubiquitin ligase, skeletrophin, is a negative regulator of melanoma invasion. Oncogene 25:7059–7069
Terheyden P, Houben R, Pajouh P, Thorns C, Zillikens D, Becker JC (2010) Response to imatinib mesylate depends on the presence of the V559A-mutated KIT oncogene. J Invest Dermatol 130:314–316
Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF, Kluger HM, Carvajal RD, Sharfman WH, Brahmer JR, Lawrence DP, Atkins MB, Powderly JD et al (2014) Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J Clin Oncol 32:1020–1030
Topcu-Yilmaz P, Kiratli H, Saglam A, Soylemezoglu F, Hascelik G (2010) Correlation of clinicopathological parameters with HGF, c-Met, EGFR, and IGF-1R expression in uveal melanoma. Melanoma Res 20:126–132
Trotman LC, Wang X, Alimonti A, Chen Z, Teruya-Feldstein J, Yang H, Pavletich NP, Carver BS, Cordon-Cardo C, Erdjument-Bromage H et al (2007) Ubiquitination regulates PTEN nuclear import and tumor suppression. Cell 128:141–156
Tsai J, Lee JT, Wang W, Zhang J, Cho H, Mamo S, Bremer R, Gillette S, Kong J, Haass NK et al (2008) Discovery of a selective inhibitor of oncogenic B-Raf kinase with potent antimelanoma activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:3041–3046
Urso C, Bondi R, Balzi M, Scubla E, Mauri P, Becciolini A, Tarocchi S, Vallecchi C (1992) Cell kinetics of melanocytes in common and dysplastic nevi and in primary and metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Pathol Res Pract 188:323–329
van der Velden PA, Metzelaar-Blok JA, Bergman W, Monique H, Hurks H, Frants RR, Gruis NA, Jager MJ (2001) Promoter hypermethylation: a common cause of reduced p16(INK4a) expression in uveal melanoma. Cancer Res 61:5303–5306
van Dijk MC, Bernsen MR, Ruiter DJ (2005) Analysis of mutations in B-RAF, N-RAS, and H-RAS genes in the differential diagnosis of Spitz nevus and spitzoid melanoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1145–1151
van Elsas A, Zerp S, van der Flier S, Kruse-Wolters M, Vacca A, Ruiter DJ, Schrier P (1995) Analysis of N-ras mutations in human cutaneous melanoma: tumor heterogeneity detected by polymerase chain reaction/single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis. Recent Results Cancer Res 139:57–67
van Ginkel PR, Gee RL, Shearer RL, Subramanian L, Walker TM, Albert DM, Meisner LF, Varnum BC, Polans AS (2004) Expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase Axl promotes ocular melanoma cell survival. Cancer Res 64:128–134
Van Raamsdonk CD, Bezrookove V, Green G, Bauer J, Gaugler L, O’Brien JM, Simpson EM, Barsh GS, Bastian BC (2009) Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi. Nature 457:599–602
Vanneman M, Dranoff G (2012) Combining immunotherapy and targeted therapies in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer 12:237–251
Vasudevan KM, Barbie DA, Davies MA, Rabinovsky R, McNear CJ, Kim JJ, Hennessy BT, Tseng H, Pochanard P, Kim SY et al (2009) AKT-independent signaling downstream of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in human cancer. Cancer Cell 16:21–32
Vergani E, Vallacchi V, Frigerio S, Deho P, Mondellini P, Perego P, Cassinelli G, Lanzi C, Testi MA, Rivoltini L et al (2011) Identification of MET and SRC activation in melanoma cell lines showing primary resistance to PLX4032. Neoplasia 13:1132–1142
Villanueva J, Vultur A, Lee JT, Somasundaram R, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Cipolla AK, Wubbenhorst B, Xu X, Gimotty PA, Kee D et al (2010) Acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors mediated by a RAF kinase switch in melanoma can be overcome by cotargeting MEK and IGF-1R/PI3K. Cancer Cell 18:683–695
Wan PT, Garnett MJ, Roe SM, Lee S, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Good VM, Jones CM, Marshall CJ, Springer CJ, Barford D et al (2004) Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF. Cell 116:855–867
Wang X, Trotman LC, Koppie T, Alimonti A, Chen Z, Gao Z, Wang J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Cordon-Cardo C et al (2007a) NEDD4-1 is a proto-oncogenic ubiquitin ligase for PTEN. Cell 128:129–139
Wang YF, Jiang CC, Kiejda KA, Gillespie S, Zhang XD, Hersey P (2007b) Apoptosis induction in human melanoma cells by inhibition of MEK is caspase-independent and mediated by the Bcl-2 family members PUMA, Bim, and Mcl-1. Clin Cancer Res 13:4934–4942
Weeraratna AT, Jiang Y, Hostetter G, Rosenblatt K, Duray P, Bittner M, Trent JM (2002) Wnt5a signaling directly affects cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma. Cancer Cell 1:279–288
Wei W, Jin J, Schlisio S, Harper JW, Kaelin WG Jr (2005) The v-Jun point mutation allows c-Jun to escape GSK3-dependent recognition and destruction by the Fbw7 ubiquitin ligase. Cancer Cell 8:25–33
Wellbrock C, Hurlstone A (2010) BRAF as therapeutic target in melanoma. Biochem Pharmacol 80:561–567
Wellbrock C, Karasarides M, Marais R (2004) The RAF proteins take centre stage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:875–885
Wellbrock C, Rana S, Paterson H, Pickersgill H, Brummelkamp T, Marais R (2008) Oncogenic BRAF regulates melanoma proliferation through the lineage specific factor MITF. PLoS One 3:e2734
Widlund HR, Horstmann MA, Price ER, Cui J, Lessnick SL, Wu M, He X, Fisher DE (2002) Beta-catenin-induced melanoma growth requires the downstream target Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor. J Cell Biol 158:1079–1087
Willmore-Payne C, Holden JA, Tripp S, Layfield LJ (2005) Human malignant melanoma: detection of BRAF- and c-kit-activating mutations by high-resolution amplicon melting analysis. Hum Pathol 36:486–493
Willmore-Payne C, Holden JA, Hirschowitz S, Layfield LJ (2006) BRAF and c-kit gene copy number in mutation-positive malignant melanoma. Hum Pathol 37:520–527
Witze ES, Litman ES, Argast GM, Moon RT, Ahn NG (2008) Wnt5a control of cell polarity and directional movement by polarized redistribution of adhesion receptors. Science 320:365–369
Wu H, Goel V, Haluska FG (2003) PTEN signaling pathways in melanoma. Oncogene 22:3113–3122
Yaguchi T, Goto Y, Kido K, Mochimaru H, Sakurai T, Tsukamoto N, Kudo-Saito C, Fujita T, Sumimoto H, Kawakami Y (2012) Immune suppression and resistance mediated by constitutive activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in human melanoma cells. J Immunol 189:2110–2117
Yan D, Zhou X, Chen X, Hu DN, Dong XD, Wang J, Lu F, Tu L, Qu J (2009) MicroRNA-34a inhibits uveal melanoma cell proliferation and migration through downregulation of c-Met. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:1559–1565
Yang G, Rajadurai A, Tsao H (2005) Recurrent patterns of dual RB and p53 pathway inactivation in melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 125:1242–1251
Yeh AH, Bohula EA, Macaulay VM (2006) Human melanoma cells expressing V600E B-RAF are susceptible to IGF1R targeting by small interfering RNAs. Oncogene 25:6574–6581
Yim EK, Peng G, Dai H, Hu R, Li K, Lu Y, Mills GB, Meric-Bernstam F, Hennessy BT, Craven RJ et al (2009) Rak functions as a tumor suppressor by regulating PTEN protein stability and function. Cancer Cell 15:304–314
Zhang Z, Sun H, Dai H, Walsh RM, Imakura M, Schelter J, Burchard J, Dai X, Chang AN, Diaz RL et al (2009) MicroRNA miR-210 modulates cellular response to hypoxia through the MYC antagonist MNT. Cell Cycle 8:2756–2768
Zheng B, Jeong JH, Asara JM, Yuan YY, Granter SR, Chin L, Cantley LC (2009) Oncogenic B-RAF negatively regulates the tumor suppressor LKB1 to promote melanoma cell proliferation. Mol Cell 33:237–247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheli, Y., Lau, E., Ronai, Z.A. (2017). Altered Signal Transduction Pathways in Melanoma. In: Bosserhoff, A. (eds) Melanoma Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41319-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41319-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41317-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41319-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)