Skip to main content

The Concept of Community as Theoretical Ground: Contention and Compatibility Across Levels of Analysis and Standpoints of Social Processes

  • Chapter
Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the concept of community as a theoretical construct. The major theme of the chapter is that the concept of community provides a theoretical construct that is critical to understanding association among individuals and the linkages between the individual and society. Linking the experiential world of the individual to the abstraction of society and culture has been an enduring analytic and theoretical problem. Society, however influential on daily lives, is not readily perceived as an object or as context by individuals. And if these lines of influence lack experiential reality, then the processes by which individuals are integrated into society and culture are equally indefinite. The concept of community provides a theoretical counter to this ambiguity. Community is a tangible social and cultural milieu that is part of daily individual experience. It also provides an accessible unit for studying social processes. Here the spatial character of community becomes of central importance. For these reasons at least, community is an enduring focus in social theory. However, the nature of that focus reflects the underlying theoretical propositions about individuals’ relationship with society at large. In this, the concept of community is used to support theories of social integration. This chapter summarizes these propositions about the concept of community in classic and contemporary theory and analysis. The chapter then discusses the application of these propositions about social integration to the concept of community in the coming century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auge, M. (2008). Non-places: An introduction to supermodernity (2nd ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2013). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Wiley. Downloaded from Amazon.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C., & Newby, H. (1975). Community studies: An introduction to the sociology of local community (2nd ed.). London: George Allen & Unwin LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C., & Newby, H. (2012). Sociology of community: A collection of readings. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1992). The good society. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1996). Habits of the heart : individualism and commitment in American life (Updated ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S. I. (1982). Individuality, autonomy and community. In E. Kamenka (Ed.), Community as a social ideal (pp. 43–62). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. J. L., & Kasarda, J. D. (1977). Contemporary urban ecology. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, J. G. (2005). The sociology of community connections. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (2014). The state and fading community. In R. Nisbet (Ed.). The quest for community: A study in the ethics of order and freedom (Kindle ed., l. 4715–6619). Wilmington: Intercollegiate Studies Institute. Downloaded from Google Books.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. S. (1993). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world (Studies in continental thought). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. S. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society (Information Age, Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (Information Age 2nd ed., Vol. 1). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certeau, M. d. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. B. (2012). Zygmunt Bauman. In P. Hubbard, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), Key thinkers on space and place (Kindle ed., pp. 47–53). London: Sage. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. P. (1985). The symbolic structure of community (2001 ed.). Taylor & Francis e-Library. Downloaded from Google Books.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (2008). Human nature and the social order (Kindle ed.) Social Science Classics Series. Evergreen Review, Inc. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1977). Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crang, M. (2012). Michel de Certeau. In P. Hubbard, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), Key thinkers on space and place (Kindle ed., pp. 106–111). London: Sage. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell. (2015). Place: An introduction (2nd ed., Kindle ed.). Wiley. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. (2006). Community and everyday life (Kindle ed.). Taylor and Francis. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. (2009). Community: Key ideas (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M. (2003). Social movements, contentious actions, and social networks: ‘From Metaphor to Substance’? In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 1–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Douthat, R. (2014). Introduction to the background edition. In The quest for community: A study in the ethics of order and freedom. Robert Nisbet (Kindle ed., pp. 39–169). Wilmington: Intercollegiate Studies Institute. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. London: Collier Macmillan; Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (2012). Toward a theory of community. In C. Bell, & H. Newby (Eds.), Sociology of community: A collection of readings (Kindle ed.). Taylor and Francis. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1995). New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities (Constitutionalism and democracy). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1996). The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society (1st ed.). New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flora, C. B., & Flora, J. L. (2013). Rural communities: Legacy and change (4th ed.). Iowa State University, Perseus Books Group. Downloaded from Google Books.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. L. (2004). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. L. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, E. F. (1957). Black bourgeoisie. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, W. P., & Poston, D. L. (1978). Sustenance organization and migration in nonmetropolitan America (Social organization of the community). Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1962). The urban villagers; group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1967). The Levittowners; ways of life and politics in a new suburban community. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (2015). America’s two urban sociologies. City & Community, 14(3), 239–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottdiener, M. (1985). The social production of urban space (1st ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. (2003). In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Why do networks matter? Rationalist and structuralist interpretations (pp. 233–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The urban experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, P. M., & Schnore, L. F. (1965). The study of urbanization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1950). Human ecology; a theory of community structure. New York: Ronald Press Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1971). Urban society; an ecological approach. New York: Ronald Press Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1984). Human ecological and marxian theories. American Journal of Sociology, 89(4), 904–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. D. B. (1949). Elmtown’s youth: The impact of social classes on adolescents. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, F. (1953). Community power structure: A study of decision makers. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (1974). Symbolic communities: The persistence and change of Chicago’s local communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, M. D. (2015). Evolving communities: Evolutionary analysis in classical and neoclassical human ecology. In J. H. Turner, R. Machalek, & A. Maryanski (Eds.), Handbook on evolution and society: Toward an evolutionary social science (pp. 316–332). Boulder: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, M. D., & Kasarda, J. D. (1994). Trade, transportation and spatial distribution. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (1st ed., pp. 342–367). Princeton: Princeton University Press & Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, M. D., & Pischke, E. C. (2016). Socio-spatial holes in the advocacy umbrella: The spatial diffusion of risk and network response among environmental organizations in the Marcellus hydro-fracturing region. In F. H. Howell, J. R. Porter, & S. A. Matthews (Eds.), Recapturing space: New middle range theory in spatial demography (pp. 199–233). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39(3), 328–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. (2003). Community: Pursuing the dream, living the reality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, F. G. (2008). Community: A trinity of models. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (2008). Sprawling places. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, A. (2012). Edward W. Soja. In P. Hubbard, & R. Kitchen (Eds.), Key thinkers on place and space (Kindle ed., pp. 380–386). London: Sage. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R. (2012). Making a place for space: Spatial thinking in social science. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown, a study in contemporary American culture. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIver, R. M. (1917). Community: A sociological study; being an attempt to set out the nature and fundamental laws of social life (3rd [1935] ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. B. (1994). Space, place, and gender. (pp. viii, 280 p). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., & Boudet, H. S. (2012). Putting social movements in their place: Explaining opposition to energy projects in the United States, 2000–2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., & Fligstein, N. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford University Press. Kindle Edition. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClay, W. M. (2014). Introduction: Why place matters. In W. M. McClay & T. V. McAllister (Eds.), Why place matters: Geography, identity, and civic life in modern America (pp. 1–9). New York: New Atlantis Books, Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. D. (1967). The metropolitan community. New York: Russell & Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriman, P. (2012). Marc Auge. In P. Hubbard, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), Key thinkers on space and place (Kindle ed., pp. 26–32). London: Sage. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minar, D. W., & Greer, S. (Eds.). (1969). The concept of community: Readings with interpretations. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction. Downloaded from Google Books.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. A. (1966). The sociological tradition. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. A. (2014). The quest for community (Kindle ed.). Wilmington: Intercollegiate Studies Institute. Downloaded from Google Books.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, R. (1966). The rural urban continuum. Sociologia Ruralis, 6, 299–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1984). The city (The heritage of sociology). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Feldstein, L. M., & Cohen, D. (2003). Better together: Restoring the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, R. (1955). The little community; viewpoints for the study of a human whole (Comparative studies of cultures and civilizations). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodaway, P. (2012). Yi-Fu Tuan. In P. Hubbard, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), Key thinkers on space and place (Kindle ed., pp. 426–431). London: Sage. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (1986). Social theory and the urban question (2nd ed.). London: Hutchinson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnore, L. F. (1965). The urban scene; human ecology and demography. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, R. (2012). Henri Lefebvre. In P. Hubbard, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), Key thinkers on space and place (Kindle ed., pp. 279–285). London: Sage. Downloaded from Amazon.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1971). On individuality and social forms; selected writings (The heritage of sociology). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A. (1995). The new urban sociology meets the old: Rereading some classical human ecology. Urban Affairs Review, 30(3), 432–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. (Globalization and community series, pp. xviii, 256 p). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, M. (2012). The myth of community studies. In C. Bell & R. Kitchin (Eds.), Sociology of community: A collection of readings (Kindle ed., pp. 13–26). New Sociology Library. Taylor and Francis. Downloaded from Amazon.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Susser, I. (2002). The Castells reader on cities and social theory. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. D. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. d. (1994). Democracy in America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, F. (1887). Community and society. Mineola: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y.-f. (2014). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, W. L., & Lunt, P. S. (1941). The social life of a modern community (Yankee City Series, Vol. 1). New Haven: Yale University Press & H. Milford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958). The city. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1979). The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 8(5), 1201–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1955). Street corner society; the social structure of an Italian slum (Enl. 2d ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L. (1928). The ghetto (The University of Chicago sociological series). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L. (1948). World community, world society, and world government. In Q. Wright (Ed.), The world community (pp. 9–20). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, B. G., & Hawley, A. H. (1968). Metropolitan area schools; resistance to district reorganization. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorbaugh, H. W. (1929). The Gold Coast and the slum: A sociological study of Chicago’s near North Side. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Irwin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Irwin, M.D. (2016). The Concept of Community as Theoretical Ground: Contention and Compatibility Across Levels of Analysis and Standpoints of Social Processes. In: Abrutyn, S. (eds) Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61601-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32250-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics