Abstract
The normal lumbar spine consists of five vertebral bodies which constitute some kind of lordosis and which are, in normal cases, perfectly aligned by three major ligaments:
-
Anterior longitudinal ligament
-
Posterior longitudinal ligament
-
Ligamenta flava
The lumbar vertebrae enclose the spinal canal, which contains the thecal sac (enclosed by the dura mater) with the spinal cord, conus medullaris, cauda equina and cerebrospinal fluid. The thecal sac is surrounded by epidural fat and a venous plexus. In cross-section, the spinal canal is circular in the upper lumbar spine segments and triangular in the lower part of the lumbar spine.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction to Normal Imaging Findings
General Features
-
The normal lumbar spine consists of five vertebral bodies which constitute some kind of lordosis [1] and which are, in normal cases, perfectly aligned by three major ligaments:
-
Anterior longitudinal ligament
-
Posterior longitudinal ligament
-
Ligamentum flavum
-
-
The lumbar vertebrae enclose the spinal canal, which contains the thecal sac (enclosed by the dura mater) with the spinal cord, conus medullaris, cauda equina and cerebrospinal fluid. The thecal sac is surrounded by epidural fat and a venous plexus. In cross-section, the spinal canal is circular in the upper lumbar spine segments and triangular in the lower part of the lumbar spine [2].
-
Intervertebral nerve roots leave the spinal canal through the intervertebral foramina, which are lined by the vertebral body and intervertebral disk (anteriorly), the facet joints (posteriorly) and the superior and inferior pedicles (craniocaudally).
-
The intervertebral disk is a very important component of the lumbar spine and will be further discussed below.
Imaging Features
With the exception of plain X-ray films, cross-sectional CT (computed tomography) or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) examinations of the lumbar spine, as they are showed in this chapter, are performed with the patient supine, i.e. non-weight-bearing position.
There are different imaging modalities which can be used for evaluating the lumbar spine:
-
Conventional X-ray is a readily available technique occasionally used in the initial evaluation of the lumbar spine. However, only skeletal elements such as the vertebral bodies (with the intervertebral space), facet joints and pedicles (with intervertebral foramina) can be appreciated. X-rays may be helpful:
-
In the evaluation of acute low back pain in cancer patients (or highly suspected).
-
In scoliosis evaluation.
-
On dynamic films when evaluating instability.
-
And finally for the evaluation of the spinal contour and measurement of the sagittal balance. When evaluating the full spine, the EOS (EOS Imaging Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) system offers better image quality, no distortion of the vertebral bodies and significant less radiation exposure to the patient as compared to classical X-rays.
Different X-ray projections can be used while imaging the lumbar spine:
-
AP (anteroposterior) projection: structures that can be seen are the vertebral bodies, transverse processes, spinous processes, pedicles and intervertebral disk spaces (Fig. 21.1). This is a proper projection for the evaluation of certain pathologies such as scoliosis.
-
Lateral projection: structures that can be seen are the vertebral bodies, spinous processes, pedicles, intervertebral foramina and intervertebral disk spaces (Fig. 21.1). The alignment of the lateral lumbar spine is given by two imaginary lines, the anterior and posterior vertebral line. As in the cervical spine, disruption of these lines may indicate fracture, dislocation or severe degenerative changes.
-
Oblique projections: the most characteristic feature in these projections is the so-called “scotty dog” appearance (Fig. 21.2). The neck of this dog is the easiest feature to recognize, representing the pars interarticularis. The nose and the eye of this dog represent the transverse process and the pedicle, respectively. The front leg represents the inferior articular process, and the ear represents the superior articular process. The ear and the leg of the dog illustrate the normal facet joints.
-
-
The intervertebral disks, the content of the spinal canal and the exiting nerve roots cannot be visualized on standard radiographs due to the insufficient contrast resolution for these structures. MRI and CT provide a greater soft tissue resolution and allow discrimination of these elements (Figs. 21.3 and 21.4).
2 The Intervertebral Disk
2.1 Normal Disk
The intervertebral disk allows and supports complex body movements. These functions require a unique structure:
-
The intervertebral disk consists of an inner nucleus pulposus and an outer annulus fibrosus.
-
The gelatinous nucleus pulposus consists of water, proteoglycans and collagen, whereas the annulus fibrosus is composed of 15–25 concentric, strong collagen layers (see also Chap. 3).
-
Due to the normal ageing process, a part of the matrix of the nucleus pulposus undergoes fibrous transformation forming the so-called intranuclear cleft.
Imaging Features
-
A normal intervertebral disk does not extend beyond the margins of adjacent vertebral plates.
-
The normal intervertebral disk presents a high signal on T2-weighted images (T2-WI) and a low to intermediate signal on T1-weighted images (T1-WI) compared to the adjacent vertebrae.
-
Because of high water content, the nucleus pulposus appears “bright” on T2-WI in contrast to the “dark” outer layers of the annulus fibrosus, which consist of fibrous tissue (Fig. 21.5).
-
The intranuclear cleft appears as a “dark” horizontal line on T2-WI, which transverses the bright nucleus pulposus (Fig. 21.5) indicating the normal maturation (and degeneration) of the intervertebral disk.
2.2 Degenerative Disk Disease
As mentioned in the chapter dealing with the imaging of the cervical spine, degenerative disk disease can be subdivided in two different entities:
-
Intervertebral osteochondrosis: involving the nucleus pulposus and the vertebral body end plates
-
Spondylosis deformans: involving the annulus fibrosus and adjacent ring apophysis
Intervertebral osteochondrosis represents a pathologic deterioration of the disk, while spondylosis deformans reflects the normal ageing process of the lumbar spine (Fig. 21.6).
2.2.1 Black Disk and Loss of Disk Height
Definition
The term “black disk” is a purely descriptive term and refers to a diminished signal intensity in the nucleus pulposus on T2-weighted images [3].
General Features
-
The loss in T2 signal intensity is believed to be due to a loss of glycosaminoglycans and, in consequence, a loss of water content [4].
-
A “black disk” differs from a normal one not only in morphology but also in biochemistry and biomechanics. That explains why this appearance on MRI (Fig. 21.7) is often interpreted as a sign of “early disk degeneration”.
-
Anatomic sections of such disks showed accumulation of fibrous tissue in the nucleus pulposus and loss of border between annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus [5].
-
Loss of water content is followed by loss of disk height. A dehydrated nucleus pulposus cannot swell to decreased negative charges, which has an important impact on the biomechanics of the intervertebral “joint”. This eventually leads to further degeneration [6, 7].
2.2.2 High-Intensity Zone
Definition
-
Also known as annular fissure and/or annular defect.
-
It is better to avoid the formerly used term “annular tear”, because this terminology tends to infer a previous trauma.
General Features and Pathophysiology
-
The annular fissure results from a decrease in proteoglycan and water content of the nucleus pulposus which causes the nucleus pulposus to parch. The normal onion-like appearance of the nucleus pulposus starts to unravel which results in clefts and cracks. These clefts extend into the annulus fibrosus.
-
A high-intensity zone, as seen on T2 WI, has been proposed to be a critical factor in disk degeneration [8]. It appears during the early stages of disk degeneration and can often be seen without the presence of other morphologic alterations [9].
-
There are three types of annular fissures (Fig. 21.7):
-
Concentric:
-
Lamellar separation (parallel with lamellar orientation)
-
-
Transverse:
-
Defect in the outer fibres of the annulus (attachment at end plate rim)
-
-
Radial:
-
Total lamellar disruption through outer margin
-
-
Clinical Features
-
Though high-intensity zones in the annulus fibrosus are considered to be associated with disk degeneration, they are more commonly discovered as an incidental finding in asymptomatic patients. However, they are only discovered in a minority of post-mortem studies of patients (over 40 years), and therefore they can be considered as a rather unusual consequence of ageing [10].
Imaging Features
-
MRI is the imaging modality of choice to depict this degenerative process, showing an abnormal signal intensity in the posterior margin of a degenerating disk.
2.2.3 Bulging Disk
Definition
-
Circumferential disk broadening beyond the margins of the adjacent vertebral body end plates
General Features
A bulging disk implies a short radius of expansion (usually less than 3 mm) affecting more than 50 % (180°) of the circumference of the intervertebral disk (Fig. 21.9).
Clinical Features
-
A bulging disk can be asymptomatic but can also give rise to low back pain, neurogenic claudication and radiculopathy.
Imaging Features
-
Bulging disks can be visualized by cross-sectional imaging techniques, CT and MRI (Fig. 21.10), as a broad-based bulge of the disk with loss of disk height. In some cases, they are accompanied by the presence of the so-called “vacuum disk” phenomenon. The bulging disk is often hypointense on both T1-WI and T2-WI (“black disk”). Furthermore, T2-WI may show a high-intensity zone (annular fissure), which can also be seen on contrast-enhanced T1-WI.
2.2.4 Disk Herniation
Definition
-
Displacement of disk material (nucleus, annular tissue, cartilage) beyond the margins of the vertebral body end plate; this displacement is not circumferential, i.e. affecting less than 50 % (180°) of the circumference of the disk.
General Features
-
There are different types of disk herniation: protrusion, extrusion and sequestration (Figs. 21.11, 21.12, 21.13, 21.14, and 21.15) [10].
Clinical Features
Symptoms may vary from low back pain to radicular pain and even cauda equina syndrome. These symptoms tend to become more severe with increased intra-abdominal pressure and during lumbar flexion and weight lifting.
Imaging Features
-
Imaging modalities of choice are CT and MRI. Axial and sagittal imaging is mandatory in the differentiation between protrusion and extrusion (as explained in Figs. 21.11 and 21.13). Both imaging planes are used to fully localize the extent of the disk herniation [10].
-
In the axial plane, disk herniation can be posterior-central, subarticular, foraminal and extraforaminal. The so-called “anterior zone” herniations are uncommon and usually asymptomatic.
-
In the sagittal plane, disk herniation can be suprapedicular, infrapedicular, pedicular or at disk level.
-
Contrast-enhanced studies often reveal peripheral enhancement on both CT and MRI, representing engorged epidural veins and/or inflammation and thickening of the posterior longitudinal ligament. This can be helpful to discriminate recurrent disk herniation from scar tissue in post-operative patients [11].
2.2.5 End Plate Changes
Degenerative vertebral end plate changes were first classified by Modic et al. [12] in 1988 and, as a result, are referred to as Modic changes. Three types of end plate changes are described, each with their characteristic features and differences on MRI:
-
Type I:
-
Hypointense on T1-WI
-
Hyperintense on T2-WI
-
-
Type II:
-
Hyperintense on T1-WI
-
Iso- to hyperintense on T2-WI
-
-
Type III:
-
Hypointense on both T1-WI and T2-WI
-
Type I changes represent bone marrow oedema and inflammation and are clearly associated with low back pain. These changes can convert to another type such as type 0 (no Modic changes) or type II changes. They are therefore said to be unstable.
Type II changes represent the conversion of normal red bone marrow to yellow bone marrow due to ischaemia and account for approximately 90 % of all Modic changes. In contrast to the type I changes, they are less commonly associated with low back pain and are said to be stable as they do not tend to convert (stress may occasionally cause conversion into type I changes).
Type III changes represent subchondral sclerosis and are usually not associated with low back pain.
3 The Facet Joints and Posterior Elements
Definition
-
Each segment of the vertebral column can be divided into two spaces: the anterior space (vertebral body) and the posterior space (vertebral arch).
-
The posterior elements together with the vertebral body enclose the spinal canal and neural foramina. These posterior elements consist of soft tissues (ligamenta flava, interspinous ligaments, supraspinous ligament, intertransverse ligaments) and bony structures (pedicles, facet joints, superior and inferior articular processes, mammillary processes, laminae and spinous processes) (Figs. 21.16, 21.17, and 21.18).
-
In the lumbar spine, pathology of the posterior elements can be the cause of low back pain, even in patients with normal intervertebral disks.
In this section we will discuss the most common pathologies of the posterior elements in the lumbar spine. This includes osteoarthritis of the facet joints, facet joint cyst formation, cysts of the ligamentum flavum (yellow ligament) and hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum.
3.1 Osteoarthritis of the Facet Joints
General Features
-
The facet joints are synovial joints located between two adjacent vertebral arches (Figs. 21.16, 21.17, and 21.18). Together with the diskovertebral complex, they allow movements between the vertebrae.
-
The surface of a normal facet joint is smooth, layered with hyaline cartilage, which gradually disappears as degeneration progresses.
-
Degenerative osteoarthritis of the facet joints causes formation of osteophytes and subchondral cysts, joint hypertrophy, osteosclerosis, narrowing of the joint space, vacuum phenomenon, joint effusion and sometimes facet joint cysts.
-
Osteoarthritis of the facet joints is a frequent cause of central, lateral and foraminal stenosis when osteophyte formation is significant.
Imaging Features
-
MRI and CT are the imaging modalities of choice. Plain radiographs are of limited value in the evaluation of the facet joints.
-
Both CT and MRI have enough spatial resolution to correctly assess the facet joints. Imaging should be performed in both axial and sagittal planes.
-
CT has been proven superior to MRI in the assessment of joint space narrowing, osteophytes and subchondral osteosclerosis (Figs. 21.19 and 21.22).
-
MRI is superior to CT in the assessment of joint effusion. Sagittal MRI images or reformatted CT images are preferred for measuring the diameters of the spinal canal and neural foramina (Figs. 21.19, 21.21, and 21.22).
3.1.1 Juxtafacet Cysts and Cysts of the Ligamentum Flavum
General Features [13]
-
Juxtafacet cysts arise from the facet joint (synovial cysts) or periarticular space (ganglion cysts) as a result of degeneration of the facet joint. They are observed most commonly in the lumbar spine at L4–L5. When they grow large, they can cause compression of the nerve roots and thecal sac.
-
Cysts of the ligamentum flavum are much less common than juxtafacet cysts and occur almost exclusively in the lumbar spine, mostly at L4–L5, as a result of degeneration.
Imaging Features
-
MRI is the modality of choice due to its high sensitivity.
-
Juxtafacet cysts on MRI imaging are mostly isointense to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). On T2-WI, these lesions can present a higher signal intensity than CSF when they have a proteinaceous content. A rim of enhancement is present after administration of gadolinium. On CT, they appear as hypoattenuating lesions. They may contain calcifications and gas (Fig. 21.20).
-
Cysts of the ligamentum flavum appear as round masses adjacent to the ligamentum flavum with high signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Peripheral enhancement after gadolinium is observed. Calcifications are uncommon (Fig. 21.21).
3.1.2 Hypertrophy of the Ligamentum Flavum
General Features
-
The ligamenta flava are spinal ligaments between the posterior aspects of the laminae of adjacent vertebral bodies (Fig. 21.17).
-
Hypertrophy of the ligamenta flava is commonly associated with degeneration of the facet joints.
-
The degenerative process induces fibrosis in the normal ligaments, which become more rigid and may eventually ossify. As a result, the intraspinal space decreases leading to compression of the thecal sac and eventually of the cauda equina.
Imaging Features
-
CT and MRI are preferred over plain films and myelography.
-
CT and MRI show hypertrophy of the ligamenta flava, which form a characteristic V-shape along the laminae (Fig. 21.22).
-
CT is superior to MRI in the detection of calcifications of these ligaments.
-
MRI shows better the effect of the compression.
3.2 Baastrup’s Disease
General Features and Imaging
Baastrup’s disease, otherwise known as the “kissing spine”, can be sometimes observed in patients with chronic low back pain. It refers to degenerative bone and soft tissue changes between apposing spinous processes. It is caused by hyperlordosis (Roussouly type 4) (see also Chap. 39), loss of disk space height or spinal instability with retrolisthesis of the cranial vertebra [14].
-
The adjacent spinous processes stay in close approximation to each other, which can be observed on medical imaging.
-
CT scan shows sclerosis and subchondral changes in the adjacent spinous processes (Fig. 21.23).
-
MRI is better in detecting effusion, cysts formation or bone marrow oedema. Fatty replacement of the paraspinal muscles is often described (Fig. 21.24).
4 Acquired Spinal Canal and Neuroforaminal Stenosis
Definition
-
Narrowing of the spinal canal and/or neural foramen secondary to multifactorial degenerative changes.
General Features [15]
-
Can be congenital (idiopathic or achondroplastic) or acquired (degenerative, iatrogenic, posttraumatic, metabolic and spondylolisthetic)
-
Mostly due to degenerative (acquired) changes
-
Anteriorly (spondylosis deformans with osteophyte formation, disk degeneration with bulging or herniation).
-
Posteriorly (degeneration and hypertrophy of the facet joints, hypertrophy or buckling of the ligamenta flava …).
-
The net result is an abnormal narrowing of the spinal canal, lateral recess and/or neural foramen. The epidural fat is usually disappeared or necrotic.
-
-
Spinal stenosis is most commonly found at high mobility levels (L4–L5).
-
Sagittal diameter of the spinal canal <13 mm: relative stenosis
-
Sagittal diameter of the spinal canal <10 mm: absolute stenosis
-
Imaging Features
-
Myelography as an imaging technique has been supplanted by MRI (or CT).
-
Axial images on MRI show a typical triangular “trefoil” appearance (Fig. 21.25).
-
Both axial and sagittal images show extrinsic impressions on the thecal sac.
-
On sagittal T2-WI, the nerve roots of the cauda equina present a thickened and elongated appearance above the level of the most severe stenosis. This appearance is known as “redundant nerve roots” and is a sign of functionally severe spinal stenosis.
-
Typical imaging findings in spinal stenosis include hypertrophic facet joints (Fig. 21.26), thickened ligamenta flava, vertebral end plate osteophytes, narrowing of the neural foramina and obliteration of the epidural fat.
5 Spondylosis Deformans
Definition
-
Hypertrophic bone changes with osteophyte formation caused by degeneration of the annulus fibrosus (Fig. 21.27).
General Features [16]
-
As disk degeneration progresses and the intervertebral space decreases in height, an increased pressure is brought upon both the facet joints and the vertebral end plates.
-
This results in progressive cartilage loss adjacent to the end plates which, in turn, results in hypertrophic changes causing formation of osteophytes at the anterior and lateral part of the vertebral body and/or facet joints.
-
In patients with lumbar hyperlordosis, hypertrophic osseous proliferation can also occur between spinous processes causing the so-called Baastrup’s disease.
-
Bone marrow changes, reactive sclerosis and end plate erosions can be seen at a late stage.
Clinical Features
-
These changes may cause low back pain, morning stiffness, crepitations and a decreased range of motion, the typical characteristics of osteoarthritis.
Imaging Features
-
Hypertrophic bone changes can be depicted on CT examinations at the level of lumbar vertebrae, spinous processes and sacroiliac joints (Fig. 21.27).
-
When small, osteophytes demonstrate a hypointense signal on T1-weigthed and fluid-sensitive images. As they enlarge, they may have a more isointense signal compared to the normal bone marrow.
-
Other features of degenerative disk changes can also be observed using CT and/or MRI (disk disease, spinal stenosis, narrowing of the neuroforamina).
References
Belkoff SM (2007) Biomechanics of the spine. In: Van Goethem J, van den Hauwe L, Parizel P (eds) Spinal imaging, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–93
Jindal G, Pukenas B (2011) Normal spinal anatomy on magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 19:475–488
Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1873–1878
Marinelli NL, Haughton VM, Munoz A, Anderson PA (2009) T2 relaxation times of intervertebral disc tissue correlated with water content and proteoglycan content. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:520–524
Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, Adams ME, Tsang IK, Bishop PB (1990) Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:411–415
Goldie I (1958) Granulation tissue in the ruptured intervertebral disc. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 42:302–304
Nowicki BH, Haughton VM, Schmidt TA, Lim TH, An HS, Riley LH 3rd, Yu L, Hong JW (1996) Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1605–1614
Modic MT, Ross JS (2007) Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology 245:43–61
Sharma A, Pilgram T, Wippold FJ 2nd (2009) Association between annular tears and disk degeneration: a longitudinal study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:500–506
Fardon DF, Milette PC, Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society ASoSR, American Society of N (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:E93–E113
Van de Kelft E, van Vyve M, Selosse P (1992) Postsurgical follow-up by MRI of anterior cervical discectomy without fusion. Eur J Radiol 15:196–199
Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR (1988) Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 166:193–199
Choudhri HF, Perling LH (2006) Diagnosis and management of juxtafacet cysts. Neurosurg focus 20(3):E1
Filippiadis DK, Mazioti A, Argentos S, Anselmetti G, Papakonstantinou O, Kelekis N, et al (2015) Baastrup’s disease (kissing spines syndrome): a pictorial review. Insights imaging 6(1):123–128
Botwin KP, Gruber RD (2003) Lumbar spinal stenosis: anatomy and pathogenesis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 14:1–15, v
Resnick D (1985) Degenerative diseases of the vertebral column. Radiology 156:3–14
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carpentier, K., Augsburg, L., De Potter, B., Van Goethem, J.W.M., Parizel, P.M. (2016). A Concise Introduction to the Imaging of the Lumbar Spine. In: van de Kelft, E. (eds) Surgery of the Spine and Spinal Cord. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27613-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27613-7_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27611-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27613-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)