Abstract
We report on our calculation of the equation of state of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) from first principles, through simulations of Lattice QCD. We use an improved lattice action and \(N_{f} = 2 + 1 + 1\) dynamical quark flavors and physical quark mass parameters. Now, we are in a position to present first results at N t = 12.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
The aim of our project is to compute the charmed equation of state for Quantum Chromodynamics (for details, see [1]). We are using the lattice discretized version of Quantum Chromodynamics, called lattice QCD, which allows simulations of the theory through importance sampling methods. Our results are important input quantities for phenomenological calculations and are required to understand experiments aiming to generate a new state of matter, called Quark-Gluon-Plasma, such as the upcoming FAIR at GSI, Darmstadt.
Our simulations are performed using so-called staggered fermions. In the continuum limit, i.e. at vanishing lattice spacing a, one staggered Dirac operator implements four flavors of mass degenerate fermions. At finite lattice spacing, however, discretization effects induce an interaction between these would be flavors lifting the degeneracy. The “flavors” are, consequentially, renamed to “tastes”, and the interactions are referred to as “taste-breaking” effects. Even though the tastes are not degenerate, in simulations one takes the fourth root of the staggered fermion determinant to implement a single flavor. This procedure is not proven to be correct—however, practical evidence suggests that is does not induce errors visible with present day statistics.
Taste-breaking is most severely felt at low pion masses and large lattice spacing, as the pion sector is distorted through the taste-breaking artifacts: there is one would-be Goldstone boson, and 15 additional heavier “pions”, which results in an RMS pion mass larger than the mass of the would-be Goldstone boson. This effect is depicted in Fig. 1 for different staggered type fermion actions. As can be seen for this figure, the previously used twice stout smeared action (“2stout”) has a larger RMS pion mass and thus taste-breaking effects than the HISQ/tree action. If, however, the number of smearing steps is increased to four, with slightly smaller smearing strength (“4stout”), the RMS pion mass measured agrees with that of the HISQ/tree action. In order to have an improved pion sector, we, therefore, opted to switch to this new action and to restart our production runs.
So far, the equation of state is known only in 2+1 flavor QCD. Here, the status of the field is marked by our papers on the \(N_{f} = 2 + 1\) equation of state [2, 3] (see Fig. 2). The contribution from the sea charm quarks most likely matter at least for T > 300–400 MeV (for an illustration, see Fig. 3).
1.1 Reference Point: The N f = 2 + 1 Equation of State
In [3] we have presented the first full calculation of the \(N_{f} = 2 + 1\) Equation of State (EoS) of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) (still using our 2stout action). This result is the reference point for our calculation of the charmed EoS, and already included one continuum extrapolated result at T = 214 MeV for the trace anomaly using our new lattice action including a dynamical charm quark (\(N_{f} = 2 + 1 + 1\)). As visible in Fig. 2, at this temperature the charm quark is not yet relevant, since the \(N_{f} = 2 + 1 + 1\) (continuum) data point falls right onto the (continuum) \(N_{f} = 2 + 1\) curve. Below this temperature, we can compare the results with and without dynamical charm and can even use the \(N_{f} = 2 + 1\) results to renormalize the \(N_{f} = 2 + 1 + 1\) curve [5, 6].
2 Progress for the Charmed Equation of State
The \(N_{f} = 2 + 1\) lattice results mentioned in the previous section agree with the HRG at low temperatures and are correct for the small to medium temperatures, and, as is shown in Fig. 3, at temperatures of about 1 GeV perturbative results become sufficiently precise. Therefore, we need to calculate the EoS with a dynamical charm only for the remaining temperatures in the region of approximately 300 MeV < T < 1000 MeV.
We are using our 4stout lattice action for these calculations. The crosscheck point shown in Fig. 2 was computed using this new action. Since it perfectly agrees with the \(N_{f} = 2 + 1\) results, even though it was computed using a dynamical charm, we can be certain that at temperatures at and below T = 214 MeV, we can rely on the \(N_{f} = 2 + 1\) results.
Our preliminary results are shown in Fig. 4, all errors are statistical only. Our results span a region of temperatures from T = 214 MeV up to T = 1. 2 GeV. At the low end we make contact to the \(N_{f} = 2 + 1\) equation of state, and at large temperatures to the HTL result. Thereby, we cover the full region of temperatures, from low temperatures, where the HRG gives reliable results, to high temperatures, where we make contact with perturbation theory. The figure contains new data points at N t = 12 generated in the last period.
2.1 Line of Constant Physics
With the switch to a new lattice action comes the need to (re-) compute the LCP. In order to be able to reach large temperatures (β > 4), we have extended these calculations since the last report. Since we would like to span the temperature range from approximately 300 MeV < T < 1000 MeV, we have to compute the LCP for a large range of couplings or lattice spacings. We split this range up in three overlapping regions (since we have to make sure that the derivative is smooth) according to the applicable simulation strategies.
At medium to coarse lattice spacings (region I) one can afford to use spectroscopy to tune the parameters. This is shown in Fig. 5. Here, we bracketed the physical point defined through M π∕f π and \((2M_{K} - M_{\pi })/f_{\pi }\) and, through interpolation, tune the light and strange quark masses to per-mill precision.
Using the parameters computed in this way, we then performed simulations on JUROPA at the SU(3) flavor-symmetrical point [8], extrapolating the results to our target couplings. There, we tuned the parameters to reproduce the extrapolated results. Since the quark masses are larger than physical, such simulations are considerably less costly than using spectroscopy as for region I, and we are thus able to compute a precise LCP down to fine lattice spacings of a = 0. 05 fm (region II), where the HMC starts being affected by the freezing of topology (Fig. 6).
For finer lattice spacings we thus used our established step scaling procedure [3] based on the w 0 scale. To this end, we computed the observable
at three different lattice spacings (a 0, a 1, a 2) and volumes (164, 204, 244) chosen to keep the physical volume fixed, extrapolated to \(a_{3} = 24/32a_{2}\), and tuned the coupling to match the extrapolated result. Using this method, we extended the LCP to very fine lattice spacings with a < 0. 05 fm (region III).
2.2 Additional Results
In another effort, we calculated the neutron-proton and other mass splittings from first principles [9], using simulations of the combined theories of Quantum Electro- and Quantum Chromodynamics. Here, we used Hermit for valence calculations, i.e. we analyzed configurations generated elsewhere, computing the mass difference for a number of different bare parameters. The complete result is shown in Fig. 7.
Due to the long range nature of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) these simulations face significant finite-size effects, inducing shifts in the results considerably larger than the signal. Through analytical calculations (see SOM of [9]), we were able to predict and thus subtract these effects. Another important step was the development of a new update algorithm for the QED, which reduced the autocorrelation by more than 2 orders of magnitude.
3 Production Specifics and Performance
Most of our production is done using modest partition sizes, as we found these to be most efficient for our implementation.
3.1 Performance
Our code shows nice scaling properties on HERMIT and HORNET. For our scaling analysis below, we used two lattices (N s = 32 and 48) and several partition sizes up to 256 nodes (HERMIT). We timed the most time consuming part of the code: the fermion matrix multiplication. The results are summarized in the following table:
Test show that our scaling on HORNET is similarly good - however at a higher performance of ≈ 22 and ≈ 21 Gflop/s for the N s = 32 and N s = 48 lattices, respectively.
3.2 Production
Given the nice scaling properties of our code, we were able to run at the sweet spot for queue throughput, which we found to be located at a job size of 64 nodes. Larger job sizes proved to have a scheduling probability sufficiently low that benefits in the runtime due to the larger number of cores were compensated and the overall production throughput decreased. We, therefore, opted to stay at jobs sizes with 64 nodes.
4 Outlook
We believe we will be able to publish within the year. HERMIT and HORNET have proved to be essential tools enabling us to achieve this goal.
5 Publications of the Project
5.1 Peer-Reviewed
- [9]:
-
Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference, Science 347 (2015) 1452–1455
- [10]:
-
Equation of state, fluctuations and other recent results from LQCD, Proceedings of the 30th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics (WWND 2014), J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 535 (2014) 012016
5.2 Other
- [11]:
-
From quarks to hadrons and back - spectral and bulk phenomena of strongly interacting matter, Proceedings of the XXVI IUPAP Conference on Computational Physics (CCP2014), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 640 (2015) 012053
- [12]:
-
Recent results on the Equation of State of QCD, Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2014), PoS(LATTICE2014) 224
References
Borsanyi, S., Endrodi, G., Fodor, Z., Katz, S.D., Krieg, S., et al.: The QCD equation of state and the effects of the charm. PoS LATTICE2011, 201 (2011). [ 1204.0995 ]
Borsanyi, S., Endrodi, G., Fodor, Z., Jakovac, A., Katz, S.D., et al.: The QCD equation of state with dynamical quarks. J. High Energy Phys. 1011, 077 (2010). [ 1007.2580 ]
Borsanyi, S., Fodor, Z., Hoelbling, C., Katz, S.D., Krieg, S., et al.: Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors Phys. Lett. B730, 99–104 (2014). [ 1309.5258 ]
Laine, M., Schroder, Y.: Quark mass thresholds in QCD thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. D73 085009 (2006). [ hep-ph/0603048 ]
Endrodi, G., Fodor, Z., Katz, S., Szabo, K.: The equation of state at high temperatures from lattice QCD. PoS LAT2007, 228 (2007). [ 0710.4197 ]
Borsanyi, S., Endrodi, G., Fodor, Z., Katz, S., Szabo, K.: Precision SU(3) lattice thermodynamics for a large temperature range. J. High Energy Phys. 1207, 056 (2012). [ 1204.6184 ]
Andersen, J.O., Leganger, L.E., Strickland, M., Su, N.: Three-loop HTL QCD thermodynamics. J. High Energy Phys. 1108, 053 (2011). [ 1103.2528 ]
Bietenholz, W., Bornyakov, V., Gockeler, M., Horsley, R., Lockhart, W., et al.: Flavour blindness and patterns of flavour symmetry breaking in lattice simulations of up, down and strange quarks. Phys. Rev. D84, 054509 (2011). [ 1102.5300 ]
Borsanyi, S., Durr, S., Fodor, Z., Hoelbling, C., Katz, S., et al.: Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference. Science 347, 1452–1455 (2015). [ 1406.4088 ]
Wuppertal-Budapest Collaboration, Krieg, S.: Equation of state, fluctuations and other recent results from LQCD. In: Proceedings of the 30th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics (WWND 2014) (2014); J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 535, 012016 (2014). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/535/1/012016
Budapest-Marseille-Wuppertal Collaboration, Wuppertal-Budapest Collaboration, Krieg, S.: From quarks to hadrons and back - spectral and bulk phenomena of strongly interacting matter. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Computational Physics (CCP 2014) (2014); J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 640(1), 012053 (2015). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/640/1/012053
Borsányi, S., Fodor, Z., Hoelbling, C., Katz, S.D., Krieg, S., Ratti, C., Szabo, K.K.: Recent results on the equation of state of QCD. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2014) (2014); PoS LATTICE2014, 224 (2015) [arXiv:1410.7917]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Krieg, S. (2016). Thermodynamics with 2+1+1 Dynamical Quark Flavors. In: Nagel, W., Kröner, D., Resch, M. (eds) High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24633-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24633-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24631-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24633-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)