Abstract
The rhizosphere represents the interface between soil and roots. In this zone, many interactions between plant roots and the soil solution occur and result in important modifications of the physicochemical properties in this area. Plants require large amounts of nutrients to assure maximum growth and development. The absorption of excess nutrients by roots leads to many changes in the rhizosphere such as the acidification phenomenon which is known to be a continuous process in many soils through the world. It is due to the extrusion of protons at the root plasma membrane in favor of cation influx, a principal way used by plants to remove nutrients from the soil solution. Rhizosphere acidification plays a crucial role in nutrient acquisition by plants and is attributed to the activity of H+ATPase pumps located at the plasmalemma. The implication of proton release in nutrient acquisition by plants was proved under low nutrient availability. Thus, an increase of the H+ATPase activity was noted under a deficiency in many essential nutrients. Due to new advances in molecular biology, the role of H+ATPases in nutrient uptake by plants is more elucidated and many genes encoding these pumps are identified. In the present chapter, we summarize information gained on the role of rhizosphere acidification in the uptake of two essential macronutrients and a key micronutrient, respectively, potassium (K), phosphorus (P), and iron (Fe), especially under deficiency conditions and we describe the recent findings related to H+ATPases that drive the acidification process.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Acidification
- H+ATPase
- Iron (Fe)
- Nutrient uptake
- Nutrient deficiency
- Rhizosphere
- Proton release
- Potassium (K)
- Phosphorus (P)
1 Introduction
Plants require nutrients for their growth and development. These elements are classified into groups. The first, macronutrients, mainly consist of potassium, magnesium, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus. The second class is termed micronutrients and includes at least manganese, boron, copper, iron, molybdenum, and zinc. Plants have evolved different mechanisms to acquire such elements from the rhizosphere. The rhizosphere is defined as the critical zone of interaction among three components: plants, soils, and microorganisms (Zhang et al. 2010; Shen et al. 2011) and is considered a key interaction zone between plants and soils (Shen et al. 2013). Therefore many interactions occur between roots and the rhizosphere at the plasma membrane site because plant biological activity can affect the chemistry of the rhizosphere. Indeed, due to their activities, roots are able to modify notably the physicochemical properties of the rhizosphere via the exudation of organic compounds or the release of H+ protons. Roots, the first organs in direct contact with the rhizosphere, are able to react with their environment and thus can alter the biogeochemistry of the rhizosphere (Schreiber et al. 2011; de Kroon et al. 2012; Postma and Lynch 2012; Hinsinger et al. 2003, 2005, 2009). This plays a key role in enhancing the bioavailability of nutrients such as P (Hinsinger 2001) via the release of proton into the external medium in order to acidify the rhizosphere (Neumann and Römheld 2002; Zhang et al. 2010; Hinsinger et al. 2009; Marschner 2012). As described previously by Marschner (1998), the processes that occur in the rhizosphere including the changes in pH or exudates released by roots play an important role in nutrient acquisition by plants. Rhizosphere acidification is a key mechanism for plant mineral nutrition (Palmgren 2001) because it is responsible for the plasma membrane proton motive force and leads to the solubility of nutrients. Recently, Fujii (2014) mentioned that soil acidification is considered an adaptive trait used by trees to uptake nutrients from the soil. Moreover, the form of nutrient taken up by roots significantly influences the rhizosphere properties. We can cite here the example of nitrogen. If this nutrient is supplied in ammonium form, an acidification of the rhizosphere occurs via the release of protons into the external medium (Taylor and Bloom 1998; Hinsinger et al. 2003). Generally, the uptake of an element is accompanied by the extrusion of a proton in the case of cations, or OH− in the case of anions. It is known that dissolution of some minerals such as calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), and aluminum (Al) vary greatly with the size of particles and with the soil pH (Pierzynski et al. 2005; Oelkers and Valsami-Jones 2008). For nitrate (NO3 −) uptake from the soil, an active transport coupled to an H+ electrochemical gradient generated by the activity of PM H+-ATPases across the root plasma membrane (Miller and Aldrich 1996; Forde 2000) takes place in the epidermal and cortical cells.
It was very well established that nutrient uptake from the soil is achieved by cation exchange, where protons (H+) are pumped by root hairs into the soil. The proton release displaces cations attached to negatively charged soil particles and thereby makes the cations available for uptake by the roots. Because macronutrients are consumed in larger quantities and generally an excess uptake of cation over anion occurs, this leads to H+ release into the external medium (Loss et al. 1993; Tang et al. 1997). In fact, when plants absorb high amounts of cations, this is positively correlated with H+ excretion in each rooting zone. The continuous release of H+ leads to a decrease of the pH around the roots and results in the acidification of the rhizosphere which is a determinant for cation driving and uptake by plants. Thus, the rhizosphere can be acidified directly under excess cation uptake over anion due to the release of protons from the roots (McLay et al. 1997). This process is related to the activity of hydrogen pumps, H+-ATPases at the root plasmalemma, and plays an important role in cation acquisition by plants. It was suggested that the improvement of nutrient uptake and use was often ascribed to rhizosphere acidification.
Nutrients can also influence the uptake of each other via feedback and thus affect plant nutritional status and consequently, a modification of the rhizosphere properties is inevitable (Zhang et al. 2010). Depending on the form of N supply, the uptake of cations and anions is modulated and can affect the pH of the rhizosphere (Marschner 2012). In this context, Shen et al. (2013) showed that localized application of ammonium combined with a superphosphate notably enhanced the productivity of Chinese crops grown in calcareous soil and attributed this effect to the role of ammonium uptake in promoting proton release by roots resulting in a decrease of rhizosphere pH and leading to an increase in the bioavailability of phosphates as documented by Jing et al. (2010, 2012). Given the importance of rhizosphere acidification, many practices have been developed to increase such a process in order to improve nutrient uptake by plants via the manipulation of rhizosphere acidification (Zhang et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2011). Rhizosphere acidification, the principal engine of nutrient uptake for plants, can be stimulated using fertilization management or via screening genotypes with high rhizosphere acidification capacity (Shen et al. 2013). It has been suggested by Guo et al. (2010) that the excessive utilization of nitrogen fertilizer in Chinese intensive agriculture promotes soil acidification in the long term. Thus, a new practice used by agriculture to improve nutrient uptake is the intercropping system, which is defined as an association of genotype with high acidification capacity with other species less efficient in this process. In China, in intercropping systems, optimization of crop combination and nutrient management via a better understanding of the interactions that occur in the rhizosphere is necessary to improve sustainable crop production characterized by a high yield and high nutrient use efficiency (Zhang et al. 2010, 2012). It has been demonstrated by Li et al. (2004) that during the association of chickpea and wheat plants supplied with organic P, the first species improved P nutrition of the second one due to the increase of acid phosphatase activity and to the rhizosphere acidification. Such findings suggested that chickpea released high amounts of protons which are beneficial for both chickpea and wheat having a tangled roots (Li et al. 2007). According to Li et al. (2008a, b), the coculture of wheat and common bean was beneficial in terms of yield productivity and proton release rate which showed a significant increase by such kind of intercropping crops as compared to legumes cultivated individually.
The acidification process has received more attention in the last decade and a multitude of methods are used to study the processes of rhizosphere acidification. The pH evaluation can be performed using the newly developed planar optode techniques (Blossfeld and Gansert 2012; Blossfeld 2013). Recently, Faget et al. (2013) found by combination of fluorescence with optode techniques, clear dynamic changes in the pH of the rhizosphere of maize and bean (Fig. 1). A new technique developed by Rudolph et al. (2013) consisting of a spatiotemporal mapping of local soil pH changes induced by lupin and soft-rush was efficient in detecting the acidification of the rhizosphere by these two species.
The acidification process based on proton release into the rhizosphere, making nutrients more available for plants, was very well demonstrated under nutrient limiting conditions and showed a decrease in the soil pH. The ability of plants to acidify their medium is considered a good criterion of tolerance to nutrient deficiency stress especially in the case of iron (Fe). New insights into the role of the H+-ATPases in rhizosphere acidification using genetic tools are available. In the present review, we summarize the implication of rhizosphere acidification in nutrient uptake, with a special focus on potassium and phosphorus as important macroelements and iron, a key micronutrient involved in many plant physiological and biochemical processes.
2 Rhizosphere Acidification and Nutrient Uptake: Role of the Pump H+ATPases
According to Hinsinger (1998), plant nutrition is not only linked to plant physiology but includes all the processes that occur in the rhizosphere before the uptake of the required nutrient. Plants are able to change the pH of the rhizosphere during their growth and development. Such a property was well documented in the literature (Haynes 1983; Marschner et al. 1986; Nye 1981). When plants take up cations excessively from the soil solution, an increase of the proton extrusion is observed (Glass et al. 1981) leading to rhizosphere acidification. Indeed, the root hairs, the first organs that keep direct contact with the soil solution, are the site of noticeable proton flux detected by the use of microelectrode vibration (Palmgren 2001). According to Ruiz et al. (2002), the plasma membrane H+-ATPase has a crucial role in ion transport and a positive correlation between H+-ATPase activity and the concentrations of cation was found in roots (Ruiz et al. 2002). Such proton release is sustained by the activities of proton pumps located at the plasma membrane (Samuels et al. 1992; Jahn et al. 1998). It is well established that the major driving force for the cation and anion transport across the plasma membrane is the active extrusion of protons (H+) due to the activity of proton pump ATPases located at the root plasmalemma. In fact, ions are taken from the soil solution and transported into the root cells prior to their distribution in the different plant tissues. During their transport across the plant plasma membrane, ions are driven by an electrochemical gradient of protons as a result of the activity of plasma membrane H/Cation-ATPases (Miller and Aldrich 1996; Sussman 1994). The latter are qualified as powerhouses for nutrient uptake (Palmgren 2001).
Due to the importance of soil acidification in nutrient acquisition, among the promising solutions to improve nutrient uptake by plants is raising the pH of the rhizosphere making the major nutrients such as K, Ca, Mg, P, S, and N more available for plant roots as suggested by Dakora and Phillips (2002).
2.1 Potassium (K+)
Potassium uptake by roots requires an exchange with an ion that has the same equivalent positive charge. Generally, one proton is exchanged against one ion of potassium. In fact, the uptake of potassium via channels depends on the electrochemical potentials across the plasma membrane (Serrano 1989). A positive correlation between potassium uptake and proton release was noted in barley by Glass et al. (1981), suggesting the importance of this process in potassium acquisition by plants. Bucker et al. (2006) reported a simultaneous extrusion of protons and K+ influx from the solution in rice, revealing a linear relationship between H+ pumping and K+ uptake by this species. It has been suggested that plants acquire potassium from soil through an active process called symport which depends on the gradient of proton via the plasma membrane as revealed by Sze et al. (1999). The occurrence of the H+/K+ symporter in the plasma membrane contributes to the K+ accumulation under potassium shortage conditions (Maathuis and Sanders 1994; Schachtman and Schroeder 1994), provides strong evidence for exchange of the K+ ion over a proton, and leads to rhizosphere acidification.
The establishment of this proton gradient creates a proton motive force responsible for the transport of cations (Rodriguez-Navarro 2000) such as monovalent ones, like potassium. Such a process is due to the activities of plasma membrane H+-ATPases. The role of these proton pumps (H+-ATPases) in K+ absorption was well demonstrated in a previous work by Minjian et al. (2007). It was also proved that K+ uptake by plants was correlated with high activity of plasma membrane H+-ATPase (Briskin and Hanson 1992). According to these authors, the plasma membrane H+-ATPase might conduct an antiport transport H+/K+ that exchanges H+ over K+, thus contributing to K+ uptake. Moreover, the extracellular acidification based on H+ pump activities was found to stimulate some transporters such as the symport K+/H+. This finding was later confirmed by the identification of genes encoding some potassium transporters in many species including LeHAK5 in tomato (Wang et al. 2002), HvHAK1 in barley (Santa-Maria et al. 1997), CaHAK1 in pepper (Martínez-Cordero et al. 2005), and OsHAK1 in rice (Bañuelos et al. 2002). Furthermore, the activation of the H+-ATPase is necessary for K absorption by roots, as suggested by Minjian et al. (2007) who demonstrated that K+ uptake by maize depends on the activity of proton pump H+-ATPase and on a specific K+ transporter located at the membrane. In fact, the activity of such pumps generated an electrochemical gradient established by the liberation of protons H+, a determinant process in the K+ acquisition by plants. These pumps were strongly stimulated when plants were subjected to limited K+ supply and resulted in an acidification of the extracellular medium. In fact, the activity of such pumps increased under K+ deficiency conditions leading to an increase of cation exchange capacity. A decrease of the pH surrounding the roots and an influx of K+ into the roots occurred simultaneously (Chen and Gabelman 2000). Several studies showed that following a few minutes of reduction of the external K+ concentrations, a hyperpolarization of the root membrane potential was noted (Maathuis and Sanders 1993; Nieves-Cordones et al. 2008). This phenomenon is considered as the first response to potassium deficiency which was accompanied by an important release of protons into the external medium and to an acidification of the rhizosphere (Behl and Raschke 1987). These two physiological responses are generated by the activity of the H+-ATPase pump at the plasma membrane via pumping of H+ from the cytoplasm to the apoplasm (Palmgren 2001). Such physiological responses are in favor of the activation of the K+ channels and transporters resulting in an important influx of K+ into the roots. Furthermore, the rate of proton excreted is considered as criteria to evaluate potassium deficiency tolerance in crops. Thus, one of the criteria of tolerance to K+ deficiency is the capacity of the plant to expulse H+. K+ uptake efficiency in tomato was correlated with a high K+ influx that was associated with low pH value (Chen and Gabelman 2000). Several proton pumps were identified in different plant species (Serrano 1989; Nardi et al. 2002). The role of these H+-ATPases was studied well by the application of different pump inhibitors or stimulators such as vanadate and fusicoccin. The vendetta is known to block the activity of H+-ATPases. For example, in rice, the addition of vanadate in the nutrient solution totally blocked the activity of the H+-ATPases, and led to an inhibition of potassium uptake by the plants (Bucker et al. 2006).
2.2 Phosphorus (P)
The involvement of rhizosphere acidification on P mobilization was described in bacteria, fungi, and plants. The bacteria PSB or the fungi PSF can mobilize soil P by the release of some compounds and via the acidification of the soil (Jones and Oburger 2011). According to the literature, the excretion of H+ into the rhizosphere improves phosphorus (P) availability in the soil (Neumann and Römheld 1999; Hinsinger et al. 2003, 2011). In fact, rhizosphere acidification led to both enhancement of P mobilization from soil and makes it available for plants (Hinsinger 2001; Hinsinger et al. 2011; Hinsinger et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2010).
As for potassium, the uptake of P involves the H+/Pi symport system as suggested by Ai et al. (2009) and is coupled to H+ transport (Sakano 1990). Thus, under P deficiency conditions, this process increased notably. In rice, the mobilization of P is due to rhizosphere acidification via the liberation of H+ from the roots. Such behavior occurred to maintain equilibrium between excessive uptake of cations against anions (Saleque and Kirk 1995). P starvation induced root H+ release (Li et al. 2004) leading to rhizosphere acidification. This was very well documented (Neumann and Römheld 1999; Raghothama 1999; Hinsinger 2001; Richardson et al. 2001; Vance et al. 2003; Tang et al. 2004; Raghothama and Karthikeyan 2005). In the case of white lupin and Lupinus albus, an acidification of the external medium occurred under P starvation (Racette et al. 1990). Shen et al. (2006) demonstrated that in soybean and Arabidopsis roots conducted under P deficiency conditions, an increase of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase (PM H+-ATPase) activity was noted. In rice, the increase of the PM H+-ATPase contributed to the rhizosphere acidification (Shen et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2011) and sustained the transport of this nutrient via the plasma membrane.
The ability of plants to acidify the rhizosphere is considered criteria to evaluate the P tolerance degree of plants inasmuch as species differ in their capacity to enhance PM H+-ATPase under P limiting availability (Shen et al. 2006). P is present in the soil solution at low concentrations (μM). Thus, systems with high affinity are involved in its transport. Furthermore, Pi uptake occurred against a chemical potential gradient across the root plasma membrane (Shen et al. 2011) and it is mediated by a symporter Pi/H+. Recently, this latter was characterized as a member of the PHT1 gene family because of the positive correlation found between PHT1 alteration and the decrease of P uptake (Ai et al. 2009).
According to Jing et al. (2010), the management of the rhizosphere through the optimization of N forms and the P input could be useful to stimulate both root proliferation and the acidification process. Calcareous soils are characterized by high pH. Thus, plants grown in such kind of soils suffered often from low nutrient availability. There, phosphorus can be present as hydroxyapatite (HAP), a stable form of dicalcium phosphate (DCP), which can be dissolved rapidly as the soil pH decreases (Wang and Nancollas 2008). Such a finding suggests the importance of the rhizosphere acidification process as an efficient strategy for mobilizing soil P from calcareous soils (Shen et al. 2011). Consequently, to improve the productivity of such areas, an application of ammonium could be effective inasmuch as NH+ 4 induces an acidification of the rhizosphere doing so, the nutrients ready for root uptake especially in the case of phosphorus. It was found that the positive effect of localized NH4 + and P on plant growth is related to its role in lowering the pH rhizosphere due to the presence of ammonium and in increasing the acquisition of P by roots (Bloom et al. 2003; Miller and Cramer 2004; Jing et al. 2010). In maize, application of ammonium decreased the rhizosphere pH by 3 pH units indicating that the localized application of P combined with ammonium improves nutrient uptake due to the stimulation of the rhizosphere acidification (Jing et al. 2010).
The coculture of cereals and legumes assumed that this association was beneficial for a cereal P status because of the high aptitude of legume species to release a larger amount of protons as revealed by Tang et al. (1997) and Hinsinger et al. (2003). In a P-deficient intercropping system, P can be mobilized by legumes because these plants are able to acidify the rhizosphere due to their capacity to release protons and this occurred during P deficiency and N fixation (Li et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2010). Because cereals are not very efficient in lowering the pH of the rhizosphere, an intercropped cereal/legume resulted in an intermediate pH (Cu et al. 2005; Li et al. 2008a, b). In fact, the form of N, ammonium (NH4 +), nitrate (NO3 −), or dinitrogen (N2), and its uptake are known to induce several changes in the pH of the rhizosphere and therefore affect P availability for plants as shown by Hinsinger et al. (2003).
In flooded soils, among the successful processes used by plants to mobilize phosphorus, we cited the acidification of the rhizosphere (Saleque and Kirk 1995) which involved the oxygen released from roots that oxidizes Fe2+ to release two protons according to the reaction:
The inequality of the uptake of cation over anion, especially in the presence of NH4+ ions in reduced soil, was shown by Begg et al. (1994). In this case, an important release of protons into the rhizosphere was noted.
2.3 Iron (Fe)
The acidification process is among the important mechanisms involved in Fe uptake by plants and characterized the Strategy I plants, especially, under the iron (Fe) deficiency. According to Liang et al. (2013), Fe acquisition in plants adopting Strategy I, is achieved by the combined functions of two components: the ferric chelate reductase and the proton-extruding H+-ATPase. In fact, this class of plants includes dicotyledonous and nongraminous monocotyledons known by their ability to induce an active proton extrusion via the increase of H+-ATPase activity in root plasmalemma leading to an acidification of the rhizosphere (Zocchi and Cocucci 1990). The decrease of the rhizosphere pH is a typical root response of dicotyledonous species under Fe deficiency conditions (Zocchi and Cocucci 1990; Donnini et al. 2009). Such a physiological response is adopted by many plant species. Peanut increases the acidification of the rhizosphere via the release of protons from the roots (Zuo et al. 2000, 2003). Lowering the rhizosphere pH is considered the most important component conferring a good adaptive response to Fe-deficiency in Strategy I plants (Santi et al. 2005). As reported by Schmidt et al. (2003), the density of the plasma membrane ATPase (PM H+-ATPase) was twofold higher in Fe-deficient roots of tomato leading to a very low pH of the rhizosphere.
As for K+ and phosphorus, the ability of plants to lower the pH of the nutrient solution is used as an important criterion to screen tolerant genotypes to Fe deficiency (Dell’Orto et al. 2000). Such findings are very well documented in many species such as peach (Molassiotis et al. 2006), kiwifruit (Rombolà et al. 2002), pea (Jellali et al. 2010), and medicago (M’sehli et al. 2011), and was observed for both glycophyte and halophyte species. A recent comprehensive study in a perennial halophyte Suaeda fruticosa revealed that this species has a great ability to acidify the external medium (Houmani et al. 2012, 2015).
The release of protons into the rhizosphere occurred via the activation of a plasma membrane proton pump (H+-ATPase) which is stimulated under such conditions (Schmidt 2003; Dell’Orto et al. 2000). In poor Fe soils, and in order to increase Fe availability, Strategy I plants activate a series of plasma membrane proton pumps (H+-ATPases) (Zocchi 2006; Kim and Guerinot 2007) resulting in the establishment of an electrochemical gradient (Palmgren 2001), and leading to an increase of ferric Fe solubility (Walker and Connolly 2008). Using immunolabeling methods, it was possible to detect the site of the H+-ATPase enzyme at the deficient subapical root zones (Dell’Orto et al. 2002; Schmidt et al. 2003; Fig. 2). The activity of these pumps has been controlled genetically due to the transcriptional upregulation of a family of HA genes, which were identified by Dell’Orto et al. (2002) in Fe-deficient cucumber plants.
The H+-ATPase activity is the key component of Strategy I plant responses to Fe shortage conditions. In fact, the differences in plant responses to Fe deficiency are particularly attributed to H+ extrusion (Schmidt 1999) rather than to FC-R activity. Recently, Slatni et al. (2011) showed an increase of the H+-ATPase activity under Fe starvation in nodules of common bean plants. The same authors have demonstrated that this H+-ATPase protein was accumulated in Fe-deficient nodules of the Flamingo common bean variety and participated in the uptake of Fe by the nodules from the soil solution. It has been shown that high H+ extrusion activity was positively correlated with a strong induction of PEPC activity in many plant species including Phaseolus vulgaris (Bienfait et al. 1989), Capsicum annuum (Landsberg 1986), and Beta vulgaris (Lopéz-Millán et al. 2000); by contrast, in plants with a low H+-ATPase activity, PEPC activity was not induced under the same conditions (Zocchi et al. 2007; M’sehli et al. 2009).
3 New Advances in the Identification of H+ATPases Using Molecular Tools
Plasma membrane H/Cation-ATPases are known as proton pumps localized in the plasma membrane of plants and are driven by the hydrolysis of ATP as a principal source of energy. H/C-ATPases play an important role in nutrient acquisition and translocation into the cell because they represent the major source of energy necessary for nutrient uptake and transport through the roots. This energy is generated by the extrusion of a positive charge across the plasma membrane. When protons are excreted into the external medium, an electrochemical gradient is established on either side of the membrane and cations can enter into the cell through the attraction due to the differences of charge and then are transported via different proteins.
Because of the recent progress in biotechnology, it is possible to provide new insights into the role of those H+/Cation- ATPases using the plant model Arabidopsis thaliana and the new advances in genetic manipulation. In fact, by using reverse genetic methods, a complete H/Cation-ATPase gene family was identified in Arabidopsis giving us good information regarding genetic control of the activity of these pumps at the posttranslational level (Palmgren 2001). Several candidate H/Cation-ATPases localized at the root epidermal cells and root hairs were identified and were considered as the principal drivers for nutrient uptake from the soil to the roots (Palmgren 2001). Using the immunoblot technique, it was possible to detect high amounts of H/Cation-ATPase apart from the epidermal cells of roots (Parets-Soler et al. 1990; Jahn et al. 1998; Figs. 3 and 4). Such a localization suggests their role in the active loading of solutes into the xylem sap (Parets-Soler et al. 1990). As described by Oufattole et al. (2000), plant plasma membrane H+-ATPases (PM H+-ATPases) are encoded by a multigene family. Recently, 12 HC-ATPase genes were cloned in Arabidopsis (Palmgren 2001). In fact, it was shown that the activity of H+-ATPase is upregulated by an H+-ATPase AtAHA gene as pointed out by several biologists (Colangelo and Guerinot 2004; Walker and Connolly 2008; Buckhout et al. 2009; García et al. 2011). Recently, an H+-ATPase (AHA) protein family was identified in Arabidopsis and was shown to be responsible for soil acidification (Ivanov et al. 2012). These data were confirmed using a mutant of AHA2 which lost its activity (Sussman 1994; Santi and Schmidt 2009). These authors demonstrated that the H+-ATPase AHA2 is responsible for the main acidification activity under iron deficiency conditions and the gene responsible for AHA2 activity is regulated under these same conditions. A family of genes encoding H+-ATPase proteins was also identified in cucumber H+-ATPase [CsHA1; Santi et al. 2005; Santi and Schmidt 2008) and (CsHA2 and CsHA3; Młodzińska et al. 2010)], and are responsible for the rhizosphere acidification process. Using a semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR and quantitative real-time RT-PCR techniques, Santi et al. (2005) successfully identified two PM H+-ATPase cDNAs (CsHA1 and CsHA2) from Fe-deficient cucumber and found a high accumulation of CsHA1 gene transcripts in roots suggesting the genetic control of the pump proton activity under lowering Fe conditions. A new proteomic study identified a root V-ATPase implicated in the responses of plants to Fe deficiency (Wang and Wu 2010; Lan et al. 2011). This protein was found to provide the necessary acidification for the induction of some physiological responses under Fe limitation conditions especially cell elongation and new root development.
4 Effect of Salinity on Rhizosphere Acidification
Salinity is a major constraint affecting plant growth and productivity (Hakeem et al. 2012, 2013). In general, saline soils are generally characterized by the predominance of salt toxic ions (mainly Na+ and Cl−) and by their low nutrient availability (Inal and Gunes 2008). This situation is probably attributed to the effect of salt ions on the H+-ATPases and resulting in an inhibition of rhizosphere acidification. Rhizosphere acidification is a central mechanism by which plants can take mineral nutrients from the soil solution. Nevertheless, the activity of these pumps is dependent on the soil structure and properties. In fact, salinity can negatively affect the H+ATPase function and lead to an inhibition of the proton release and consequently inhibit nutrient uptake by plants. It was demonstrated that a moderate salt stress inhibited the rhizosphere acidification of many glycophyte species. For Medicago ciliaris, the application of 75 mM NaCl reduced the activity of PM H+-ATPase, resulting in a reduction of Fe uptake by this species (Rabhi et al. 2007; M’sehli et al. 2011). The study on some nutrient deficiency in halophytes, plants adapted to extreme environmental conditions, revealed that such kind of vegetation is able to maintain the uptake of nutrients from soil with high salinity levels. This behavior was proved under nutrient deficiency. A recent study (Houmani et al. 2015) of the halophyte Suaeda fruticosa under the combined effect of salt stress and iron deficiency showed that this species was able to maintain its acidification capacity under high salinity levels to maintain the uptake of this element of the external medium.
5 Conclusion
Rhizosphere acidification is an important natural process for nutrient uptake by plants. The liberation of the proton is in favor of the uptake of one cation. The proton release is essential for driving the transport of nutrients into the roots. This phenomenon is complex and is due to very consistent powerhouses, the H+-ATPases that function to assure an adequate nutrient supply for plants. The use of the new advances in genetic research gives new insights in the role of such proton pumps in mineral uptake and translocation from the rhizosphere into the roots. The role of H+-ATPases in higher plant nutrition was well demonstrated under limiting conditions of deficiency in several essential elements such as potassium, phosphorus, and iron.
References
Ai PH, Sun SB, Zhao JN, Fan XR, Xin WJ, Guo Q, Yu L, Shen QR, Wu P, Miller AJ, Xu G (2009) Two rice phosphate transporters, OsPht1;2 and OsPht1;6, have different functions and kinetic properties in uptake and translocation. Plant J 57:798–809
Arend M, Monshausen G, Wind C, Weisenseel MH, Fromm J (2004) Effect of potassium deficiency on the plasma membrane H+-ATPase of the wood ray parenchyma in poplar. Plant Cell Environ 27:1288–1296
Bañuelos MA, Garciadeblas B, Cubero B, Rodriguez-Navarro A (2002) Inventory and functional characterization of the HAK potassium transporters of rice. Plant Physiol 130:784–795
Begg CMB, Kirk GJD, Mackenzie AF, Neue HU (1994) Root-induced iron oxidation and pH changes in the lowland rice rhizosphere. New Phytol 128:469–477
Behl R, Raschke K (1987) Close coupling between extrusion of H+ and uptake of K+ by barley roots. Planta 172:531–538
Bienfait HF, Lubberding HJ, Heutink P, Lindner L, Visser V, Kaptein R, Dijkstra K (1989) Rhizosphere acidification by iron deficient bean plants: the role of trace amounts of divalent metal ions. A study on roots of intact plants with the use of 11C- and 31P-NMR. Plant Physiol 90:359–364
Bloom AJ, Meyerhoff PA, Taylor AR, Rost TL (2003) Root development and absorption of ammonium and nitrate from the rhizosphere. J Plant Growth Regul 21:416–431
Blossfeld S, Gansert D (2012) The Use of Planar Optodes in Root Studies for Quantitative Imaging. Measuring Roots pp 83–92
Blossfeld S, Schreiber CM, Liebsch G, Kuhn AJ, Hinsinger P (2013) Quantitative imaging of rhizosphere pH and CO2 dynamics with planar optodes. Ann Bot 112:267–276
Briskin DP, Hanson JB (1992) How does the plant plasma membrane H+-ATPase pump protons? J Exp Bot 43:269–289
Bucker CA, de Souza SR, Fernandes MS (2006) Effects of fusicoccin and vanadate on proton extrusion and potassium uptake by rice. J Plant Nutr 29:485–496
Buckhout TJ, Yang TJW, Schmidt W (2009) Early iron-deficiency-induced transcriptional changes in Arabidopsis roots as revealed by microarray analyses. BMC Genomics 10:147
Chen J, Gabelman WH (2000) Morphological and physiological characteristics of tomato roots associated with potassium-acquisition efficiency. Sci Hortic 83:213–225
Chen Z, Cui Q, Liang C, Sun L, Tian J, Liao H (2011) Identification of differentially expressed proteins in soybean nodules under phosphorus deficiency through proteomic analysis. Proteomics 11:4648–4659
Colangelo EP, Guerinot ML (2004) The essential basic helix-loop-helix protein FIT1 is required for the iron deficiency response. Plant Cell 16:3400–3412
Cu STT, Hutson J, Schuller KA (2005) Mixed culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) improves the growth and phosphorus nutrition of the wheat. Plant Soil 272:143–151
Dakora FD, Phillips DA (2002) Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low -nutrient environments. Plant Soil 245:35–47
de Kroon H, Hendriks M, Van Ruijven J, Ravenek J, Padilla FM, Jongejans E, Visser EJW, Mommer L (2012) Root responses to nutrients and soil biota: drivers of species coexistence and ecosystem productivity. J Ecol 100:6–15
Dell’Orto M, Santi S, De Nisi P, Cesco S, Varanini Z, Zocchi G, Pinton R (2000) Development of Fe-deficiency responses in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) roots: involvement of plasma membrane H+−ATPase activity. J Exp Bot 51:695–701
Dell’Orto M, Pirovano L, Villalba JM, Gonzales-Reyes JA, Zocchi G (2002) Localization of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase in Fe-deficient cucumber roots by immunodetection. Plant Soil 241:11–17
Donnini S, Castagna A, Ranieri A, Zocchi G (2009) Differential responses in pear and quince genotypes induced by Fe deficiency and bicarbonate. J Plant Physiol 166:1181–1193
Faget M, Blossfeld S, von Gillhaussen P, Schurr U, Temperton VM (2013) Disentangling who is who during rhizosphere acidification in root interactions: combining fluorescence with optode techniques. Front Plant Sci 4:392
Forde BG (2000) Nitrate transporters in plants: structure, function and regulation. Biochem Biophys Acta 1465:219–235
Fujii K (2014) Soil acidification and adaptations of plants and microorganisms in Bornean tropical forests. Ecol Res 29:371–381
García MJ, Suárez V, Romera FJ, Alcántara E, Pérez-Vicente R (2011) A new model involving ethylene, nitric oxide and Fe to explain the regulation of Fe-acquisition genes in Strategy I plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 49:537–544
Glass ADM, Siddiqi MY, Giles KI (1981) Correlations between potassium uptake and hydrogen efflux in barley varieties: a potential screening method for the isolation of nutrient efficient lines. Plant Physiol 68:457–459
Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, Zhang WF, Christie P, Goulding KWT, Vitousek PM, Zhang FS (2010) Significant acidification in major Chinese crop lands. Science 327:1008–1010
Hakeem KR, Khan F, Chandna R, Siddiqui TO, Iqbal M (2012) Genotypic variability among soybean genotypes under NaCl stress and proteome analysis of salt tolerant genotype. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 168:2309–2329
Hakeem KR, Chandna R, Rehman R, Tahir I, Sabir M, Iqbal M (2013) Unraveling salt stress in plants through proteomics. In: Parvaiz A, Azooz MM, Prasad MNV (eds) Salt stress in plants: signelling, omics and adaptations. Springer, New York, pp 47–61
Haynes RJ (1983) Soil acidification induced by leguminous crops. Grass Forage Sci 38:1–11
Hinsinger P (1998) How do plant roots acquire mineral nutrients? Chemical processes involved in the rhizosphere. Adv Agron 64:225–265
Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195
Hinsinger P, Plassard C, Tang CX, Jaillard B (2003) Ori- gins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: a review. Plant Soil 248:43–59
Hinsinger P, Gobran GR, Gregory PJ, Wenzel WW (2005) Rhizosphere geometry and heterogeneity arising from root-mediated physical and chemical processes. New Phytol 168:293–303
Hinsinger P, Bengough AG, Vet-terlein D, Young IM (2009) Rhizosphere: biophysics, bio- geochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant Soil 321:117–152
Hinsinger P, Brauman A, Devau N, Gérard F, Jourdan C, Laclau JP, Le Cadre E, Jaillard B, Plassard C (2011) Acquisition of phosphorus and other poorly mobile nutrients by roots. Where do plant nutrition models fail? Plant Soil 348:29–61
Houmani H, Jellali N, Abdelly C, Gharsalli M (2012) Mineral elements bioavailability in the halophyte species Suaeda fruticosa. J Biol Res 17:113–120
Houmani H, Debez A, Slatni T, Yousfi S, Jellali N, M’sehli W, Abdelly C, Gharsalli M (2015) Insights into physiological responses of the halophyte Suaeda fruticosa to simultaneous salinity and iron deficiency. Clean Soil Air Water. doi:10.1002/clen.201300810
Inal A, Gunes A (2008) Interspecific root interactions and rhizosphere effects on salt ions and nutrient uptake between mixed grown peanut/maize and peanut/barley in original saline–sodic–boron toxic soil. Plant Physiol 165:490–503
Ivanov R, Brumbarova T, Bauer P (2012) Fitting into the harsh reality: regulation of iron-deficiency responses in dicotyledonous plants. Mol Plant 5:27–42
Jahn T, Baluska F, Michalke W, Harper JF, Volkmann D (1998) Plasmamembrane H+ATPase in the root apex: evidence for strong expression in xylem parenchyma and asymmetric localization within cortical and epidermal cells. Physiol Plant 104:311–316
Jellali N, M’sehli W, Dell’Orto M, Abdelly C, Gharsalli M, Zocchi G (2010) Changes of metabolic responses to direct and induced Fe deficiency of two Pisum sativum cultivars. Environ Exp Bot 68:238–246
Jing JY, Rui YK, Zhang FS, Rengel Z, Shen JB (2010) Localized application of phosphorus and ammonium improves growth of maize seedlings by stimulating root proliferation and rhizosphere acidification. Field Crop Res 119:355–364
Jing JY, Zhang FS, Rengel Z, Shen JB (2012) Localized fertilization with P plus N elicits an ammonium-dependent enhancement of maize root growth and nutrient uptake. Field Crop Res 133:176–185
Jones DL, Oburger E (2011) Solubilization of phosphorus by soil microorganisms. In: Buenemann EK, Oberson A, Frossard E (eds) Phosphorus in action. Springer, New York, pp 169–198
Kim SA, Guerinot ML (2007) Mining iron: iron uptake and transport in plants. FEBS Lett 581:2273–2280
Lan P, Li W, Wen TN, Shiau JY, Wu YC, Lin W, Schmidt W (2011) iTRAQ protein profile analysis of Arabidopsis roots reveals new aspects critical for iron homeostasis. Plant Physiol 155:821–834
Landsberg EC (1986) Function of rhizodermal transfer cells in the Fe stress response mechanism of Capsicum annuum L. Plant Physiol 82:511–517
Li SM, Li L, Zhang FS, Tang C (2004) Acid phosphatase role in chickpea/maize intercropping. Ann Bot 94:297–303
Li L, Li SM, Sun JH, Zhou LL, Bao XG, Zhang HG, Zhang FS (2007) Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. PNAS 104:11192–11196
Li H, Shen J, Zhang F, Clairotte M, Drevon JJ, Le Cadre E, Hinsinger P (2008a) Dynamics of phosphorus fractions in the rhizosphere of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and durum wheat (Triticum turgidum durum L.) grown in monocropping and intercropping systems. Plant Soil 312:139–150
Li HG, Shen JB, Zhang FS, Tang CX, Lambers H (2008b) Is there a critical level of shoot phosphorus concentration for cluster-root formation in Lupinus albus? Funct Plant Biol 35:328–336
Liang C, Tian J, Liao H (2013) Proteomics dissection of plant responses to mineral nutrient deficiency. Proteomics 13:624–636
Lopéz-Millán AF, Morales F, Andaluz S, Gogorcena Y, Abadía A, De Las RJ, Abaía J (2000) Responses of sugar beet roots to iron deficiency: changes in carbon assimilation and oxygen use. Plant Physiol 124:885–897
Loss SP, Robson AD, Ritchie GSP (1993) H+/OH− excretion and nutrient uptake in upper and lower parts of lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) root systems. Ann Bot 72:315–320
M’sehli W, Dell’Orto M, De Nisi P, Donnini S, Abdelly C, Zocchi G, Gharsalli M (2009) Responses of two ecotypes of Medicago ciliaris to direct and bicarbonate induced iron deficiency conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 31:667–673
M’sehli W, Jellali N, Dell’Orto M, Abdelly C, Zocchi G, Gharsalli M (2011) Responses of two lines of Medicago ciliaris to Fe deficiency under saline conditions. Plant Growth Regul 64:221–230
Maathuis FJM, Sanders D (1993) Energization of potassium uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 191:302–307
Maathuis FJM, Sanders D (1994) Mechanism of high affinity potassium uptake in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. PNAS 91:9272–9276
Marschner H (1998) Role of root growth, arbuscular mycorrhiza, and root exudates for the efficiency in nutrient acquisition. Field Crop Res 56:203–207
Marschner P (2012) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic, Boston
Marschner H, Römheld V, Horst WJ, Martin P (1986) Root-induced changes in the rhizosphere: importance for the mineral nutrition of plants. Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenk 149:441–456
Martínez-Cordero MA, Martínez V, Rubio F (2005) High-affinity K+ uptake in pepper plants. J Exp Bot 56:1553–1562
McLay CDA, Barton L, Tang C (1997) Acidification potential of ten grain legume species grown in nutrient solution. Aust J Agric Res 48:1025–1032
Miller AG, Aldrich RW (1996) Conversion of a delayed rectifier K+ channel to a voltage-gated inward rectifier K+ channel by three amino acid substitutions. Neuron 16:853–858
Miller AJ, Cramer MD (2004) Root nitrogen acquisition and assimilation. Plant Soil 274:1–36
Minjian C, Haiqiu Y, Hongkui Y, Chunji J (2007) Difference in tolerance to potassium deficiency between two maize inbred lines. Plant Biosyst 134:333–339
Młodzińska E, Wdowikowska A, Kłobus G (2010) Identification and characterization of two genes encoding plasma membrane H+-ATPase in Cucumis sativus L. Acta Physiol Plant 32:1103–1111
Molassiotis A, Tanou G, Diamantidis G, Patakas A, Therios I (2006) Effects of 4-month Fe deficiency exposure on Fe reduction mechanism, photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidant defense in two peach rootstocks differing in Fe deficiency tolerance. J Plant Physiol 163:176–185
Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, Vianello A (2002) Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1527–1532
Neumann G, Römheld V (1999) Root excretion of carboxylic acids and protons in phosphorus-deficient plants. Plant Soil 211:121–130
Neumann G, Römheld V (2002) Root-induced changes in the availability of nutrients in the rhizosphere. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots, the hidden half, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 617–649
Nieves-Cordones M, Miller A, Aleman F, Martınez V, Rubio F (2008) A putative role for the plasma membrane potential in the control of the expression of the gene encoding the tomato high-affinity potassium transporter HAK5. Plant Mol Biol 68:521–532
Nye PH (1981) Changes of pH across the rhizosphere induced by roots. Plant Soil 61:7–26
Oelkers EH, Valsami-Jones E (2008) Phosphate mineral reactivity and global sustainability. Elements 4:83–87
Oufattole M, Arango M, Boutry M (2000) Identification and expression of three new Nicotiana plumbaginifolia genes which encode isoforms of a plasma-membrane H+-ATPase, and one of which is induced by mechanical stress. Planta 210:715–722
Palmgren MG (2001) Plant plasmamembrane HC-ATPases: powerhouses for nutrient uptake. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:817–845
Parets-Soler A, Pardo JM, Serrano S (1990) Immunocytolocalization of plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Plant Physiol 93:1654–1658
Pierzynski GM, Mc Dowell RW, Sims JT (2005) Chemistry, cycling, and potential moment of inorganic phosphorus in soils. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN (eds) Phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 53–86
Postma JA, Lynch JP (2012) Complementarity in root architecture for nutrient uptake in ancient maize/bean and maize/bean/squash polycultures. Ann Bot 110:521–534
Rabhi M, Barhoumi Z, Ksouri R, Abdelly C, Gharsalli M (2007) Interactive effects of salinity and iron deficiency in Medicago ciliaris. C R Biol 330:779–788
Racette S, Louis I, Torrey JG (1990) Cluster root formation by Gymnostoma papuanum (Casuarinaceae) in relation to aeration and mineral nutrient availability in water culture. Can J Bot 68:2564–2570
Raghothama KG (1999) Phosphate acquisition. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:665–693
Raghothama KG, Karthikeyan AS (2005) Phosphate acquisition. Plant Soil 274:37–49
Richardson AE, Hadobas PA, Hayes JE (2001) Extracellular secretion of Aspergillus phytase from Arabidopsis roots enables plants to obtain phosphorus from phytate. Plant J 25:641–649
Rodriguez-Navarro A (2000) Potassium transport in fungi and plants. Biochem Biophys Acta 1469:1–30
Rombolà AD, Brüggemann W, López-Millán AF, Tagliavini M, Abadía J, Marangoni B, Moog PR (2002) Biochemical responses to iron deficiency in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). Tree Physiol 22:869–875
Rudolph N, Voss S, Moradi AB, Nagl S, Oswald SE (2013) Spatio-temporal mapping of local soil pH changes induced by roots of lupin and soft-rush. Plant Soil 369:669–680
Ruiz JM, Hernández J, Castilla N, Romero L (2002) Effect of soil temperature on K and Ca concentrations and on ATPase and pyruvate kinase activity in potato roots. Hort Sci 37:325–328
Sakano K (1990) Proton/phosphate stoichiometry in uptake of inorganic phosphate by cultured cells of Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. Plant Physiol 93:479–483
Saleque MA, Kirk GJD (1995) Root-induced solubilization of phosphate in the rhizosphere of lowland rice. New Phytol 129:325–336
Samuels AL, Fernando M, Glass ADM (1992) Immunofluorescent localization of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in barley roots and effects of K nutrition. Plant Physiol 99:1509–1514
Santa-Maria GE, Rubio F, Dubcovsky J, Rodriguez-Navarro A (1997) The HAK1 gene of barley is a member of a large gene family and encodes a high-affinity potassium transporter. Plant Cell 9:2281–2289
Santi S, Schmidt W (2008) Laser microdissection-assisted analysis of the functional fate of iron deficiency-induced root hairs in cucumber. J Exp Bot 59:697–704
Santi S, Schmidt W (2009) Dissecting iron deficiency-induced proton extrusion in Arabidopsis roots. New Phytol 183:1072–1084
Santi S, Cesco S, Varanini Z, Pinton R (2005) Two plasma membrane H+-ATPases genes are differentially expressed in iron-deficient cucumber plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:287–292
Schachtman DP, Schroeder JI (1994) Structure and transport mechanism of a high-affinity potassium uptake transporter from higher plants. Nature 370:655–658
Schmidt W (1999) Mechanisms and regulation of reduction-based iron uptake in plants. New Phytol 141:1–26
Schmidt W (2003) Iron solutions: acquisition strategies and signaling pathways in plants. Trends Plant Sci 8:188–193
Schmidt W, Michalke W, Schikora A (2003) Proton pumping by tomato roots. Effect of Fe deficiency and hormones on the activity and distribution of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in rhizodermal cells. Plant Cell Environ 26:361–370
Schreiber CM, Zeng B, Temperton VM, Rascher U, Kazda M, Schurr U, Höltkemeier A, Kuhn AJ (2011) Dynamics of organic acid occurrence under flooding stress in the rhizosphere of three plant species from the water fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, P.R. China. Plant Soil 344:111–129
Serrano R (1989) Structure and function of plasma membrane ATPase. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:61–94
Shen H, Chen J, Wang Z, Yang C, Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Matsumoto H, Yan X (2006) Root plasma membrane H+-ATPase is involved in the adaptation of soybean to phosphorus starvation. J Exp Bot 57:1353–1362
Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J, Li H, Bai Z, Chen X, Zhang W, Zhang F (2011) Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiol 156:997–1005
Shen J, Li C, Mi G, Li L, Yuan L, Jiang R, Zhang F (2013) Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China. J Exp Bot 64:1181–1192
Slatni T, Vigani G, Ben Salah I, Kouas S, Dell’Orto M, Gouia H, Zocchi G, Abdelly C (2011) Metabolic changes of iron uptake in N2-fixing common bean nodules during iron deficiency. Plant Sci 181:151–158
Sussman MR (1994) Molecular analysis of proteins in the plant plasma membrane. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 45:211–234
Sze H, Li X, Palmgren MG (1999) Energization of plant cell membranes by H+-Pumping ATPases: regulation and biosynthesis. Plant Cell 11:677–689
Tang C, McLay CDA, Barton LA (1997) Comparison of proton excretion of twelve pasture legumes grown in nutrient solution. Aust J Exp Agric 37:563–570
Tang C, Drevon JJ, Jaillard B, Souche G, Hinsinger P (2004) Proton release of two genotypes of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as affected by N nutrition and P deficiency. Plant Soil 260:59–68
Taylor AR, Bloom AJ (1998) Ammonium, nitrate and proton fluxes along the maize root. Plant Cell Environ 21:1255–1263
Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan DL (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol 157:423–447
Walker EL, Connolly EL (2008) Time to pump iron: iron-deficiency-signaling mechanisms of higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:530–535
Wang LJ, Nancollas GH (2008) Calcium orthophosphates: crystallization and dissolution. Chem Rev 108:4628–4669
Wang Y, Wu WH (2010) Plant sensing and signaling in response to K+-deficiency. Mol Plant 3:280–287
Wang YH, Garvin DF, Kochian LV (2002) Rapid induction of regulatory and transporter genes in response to phosphorus, potassium, and iron deficiencies in tomato roots. Evidence for cross talk and root/rhizosphere-mediated signals. Plant Physiol 130:1361–1370
Zhang F, Shen J, Zhang J, Zuo Y, Li L, Chen X (2010) Rhizosphere processes and management for improving nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity: implications for China. Adv Agron 107:1–32
Zhang FS, Cui ZL, Fan MS, Zhang WF, Chen XP, Jiang RF (2011) Integrated soil–crop system management: reducing environmental risk while increasing crop productivity and improving nutrient use efficiency in China. J Environ Qual 40:1051–1057
Zhang FS, Cui ZL, Chen XP, Ju XT, Shen JB, Chen Q, Liu XJ, Zhang WF, Mi GH, Fan MS (2012) Integrated nutrient management for food security and environmental quality in China. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 116. Academic, San Diego, pp 1–40
Zocchi G (2006) Metabolic changes in iron-stressed dicotyledonous plants. In: Barton LL, Abadia J (eds) Iron nutrition in plants and rhizospheric microorganisms. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 359–370
Zocchi G, Cocucci S (1990) Fe uptake mechanism in Fe-efficient cucumber roots. Plant Physiol 92:908–911
Zocchi G, De Nisi P, Dell’Orto M, Espen L, Gallina PM (2007) Iron deficiency differently affects metabolic responses in soybean roots. J Exp Bot 58:993–1000
Zuo Y, Zhang F, Li X, Cao Y (2000) Studies on the improvement in iron nutrition of peanut by intercropping with maize on a calcareous soil. Plant Soil 220:13–25
Zuo Y, Li X, Cao X, Zhang F, Christie P (2003) Iron nutrition of peanut enhanced by mixed cropping with maize: possible role of root morphology and rhizosphere microflora. J Plant Nutr 26:2093–2110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Houmani, H., Rabhi, M., Abdelly, C., Debez, A. (2015). Implication of Rhizosphere Acidification in Nutrient Uptake by Plants: Cases of Potassium (K), Phosphorus (P), and Iron (Fe). In: Hakeem, K. (eds) Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23162-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23162-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23161-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23162-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)