Abstract
The high energy consumption in the building sector, especially for heating and cooling, has promoted new and more restrictive energy policies around the world, such as the new European Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy consumption of buildings. Apart from enforcing stringent building codes that include minimum energy consumption for new and refurbished buildings, the IEA ETP 2012 highlights the necessity of using highly efficient technologies in the envelopes, equipment, and new strategies to address the high energy consumption of the sector. In this context, the use of appropriate thermal energy storage (TES) systems has a high potential to reduce the energy demand for both heating and cooling. The use of TES in the building sector not only leads to the rational use of thermal energy, which reduces the energy demand, but allows peak load shifting strategies, as well as manages the gap between possible renewable energy production and heating/cooling demands. In this chapter, various available technologies are analyzed where sensible, latent, or thermochemical storages are implemented in either active, passive, or hybrid building systems.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Heat Pump
- Thermal Comfort
- Phase Change Material
- International Energy Agency
- Thermal Energy storageThermal Energy Storage
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
Energy use in buildings means a large part of global energy demand becoming 30 % of energy-related CO2 emissions (one-third of black carbon emissions) and 32 % of global energy used. Over 60 % of residential, and almost 50 % of commercial building energy, is expended for thermal application as water heating in residential buildings, and as a cooling supply in commercial buildings (IEA 2012; Ürge-Vorsatz et al. 2015).
Thermal energy storage (TES) is also known as heat and/or cold storage (Cabeza 2015; Mehling and Cabeza 2008). This technology allows storing thermal energy to be used at a later time. Implementing TES in buildings allows the use of renewable sources of heat and cold that otherwise would not be possible (Heier et al. 2015). The duration of the storage can be from short-term, daily storage, to long-term storage, usually between seasons and known as seasonal storage.
The application of storage in buildings can have various objectives. One of them is the reduction of the building energy demand, either by reusing the high internal gains or by storing exterior heat or cold to be used in the building. A second objective is “peak shaving” (also called “peak shifting”), as shown in Fig. 16.1; usually, according to this strategy, no energy is saved, but economic advantages are achieved. TES can also improve HVAC systems, increasing their efficiency or reducing emissions.
2 Materials Used for TES in Buildings
TES materials are becoming a key issue for the deployment of thermal heating and cooling technologies in the building sector. Meanwhile, the International Energy Agency (IEA) suggests energy storage as a possible answer to address the energy problems described in Sect. 16.1, focusing on materials and systems for building applications (IEA 2010). As previously stated, thermal energy can be stored following three processes: as sensible heat, as latent heat, or as thermochemical heat . These methods are described in the following sections as well as the desired properties for material selection, as are the main advantages and drawbacks of each technology.
2.1 Sensible Heat
This is the simplest method for storing thermal energy and consists of applying a temperature gradient to a media (solid or liquid); the heat that can be accumulated in this media is the sensible heat stored. Figure 16.2 shows the thermal profile of one substance or material when a temperature gradient is applied. The area under the curve is the total heat accumulated (Basecq et al. 2013).
The most common storage media used to store energy as sensible heat is water (see Fig. 16.2 as ice). Sensible heat storage has two main advantages: it is cheap and is without the risks derived from the use of toxic materials. Moreover, the material used to store energy is contained in vessels as bulk material, thereby facilitating the system design.
Heat capacity comes from either the content of the material used, volume, or mass. Sensible heat is often used with solids, such as stone or brick, or from liquids, such as water (high specific heat).
The materials mainly used to store sensible heat are based on common ceramics (cement, concrete, etc.), or natural stones, such as marble, granite, clay, sandstone, or polymers (PUR, PS, PVC). All of them are inexpensive materials, and sensible heat will depend on the mass and volume used. Therefore, waste materials or by-products from several industrial processes with proper thermophysical properties are becoming suitable candidates to be used for sensible heat TES (Fernandez et al. 2010; Navarro et al. 2011). Figure 16.3 shows the specific heat capacity versus density of all the materials mentioned before to be used as sensible heat media. Note that the waste materials are proper candidates because they have a high enough density and account for suitable specific heat capacity.
The more relevant properties for sensible heat TES are the ones collected in Table 16.1. The physical and technical requirements must be taken into account during the design step of the system to be implemented in buildings .
Materials to be used for sensible heat-TES can present two drawbacks. The first is related to corrosion incompatibility, but this drawback is easy to avoid if the material used to contain the storage media is well selected and/or the surface of the vessel material is coated with a material that is compatible with the sensible storage material. The second drawback is the thermal stability over thermal cycles. This behavior must be studied before the implementation under real thermal conditions fitted to the application.
2.2 Latent Heat
TES proposes phase change material (PCM) as materials able to store high amounts of energy as latent heat. PCMs increase the thermal mass of the building envelopes and building systems . Such materials have been extensively studied in the past by several researchers (Baetens et al. 2010; Khudhair and Farid 2004; Sharma and Sagara 2005; Zalba et al. 2003). Among all materials, those that have high storage density for small temperature ranges are considered PCM (Günther et al. 2006), and are classified as different groups, depending on the material nature (paraffin, fatty acids, salt hydrates, etc.).
A conventional profile—when one PCM is submitted to a temperature gradient—is shown in Fig. 16.4. The extremes correspond to sensible heat, and the central part to latent heat stored.
A temperature increment produces a temperature increase on the material evaluated. Then, the temperature remains constant during the phase change but the heat stored is increased. Further storage of heat results as sensible heat again when the phase change is finished.
Buildings can use the latent heat from PCM by two different concept systems: passive latent heat energy storage systems (LHES), or using active LHES systems (Parameshwaran et al. 2012). However, independently of each system, PCM must be encapsulated or stabilized for technical use, and PCMs are introduced in building systems using several methods.
PCM encapsulation in structures is the direct inclusion in walls and ceilings. These building components offer large areas for passive heat transfer within every zone of the building (Zhang et al. 2010).
Impregnation (Khudhair and Farid 2004) is an extensively used method to introduce PCM in porous materials such as gypsum (Nomura et al. 2009), mortar, wood, etc. This technique has been widely studied lately (Barreneche et al. 2013a, b; De Gracia et al. 2011), and is based on introducing liquid PCM inside porous materials using vacuum systems.
A microencapsulation (Tyagi et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2010) PCM process is projected as one way to incorporate PCM in building materials becoming a TES part of the building structure even for lightweight buildings . Microcapsules consist of small PCM containers using hard shells, although they allow volume changes.
A shape-stabilized PCM is the incorporation of PCM in a polymer as one shape stabilized material (Del Barrio et al. 2009; Li et al. 2012). PCM slurries consist of a microcapsuled PCM suspended on a thermal fluid to be used applying them in several active systems such as heat exchangers and thermal control systems (Delgado et al. 2012). Material candidates to be used as latent heat TES must undertake several required properties. Table 16.1 shows the properties required by PCM for building applications (Cabeza et al. 2011; Tyagi and Buddhi 2007).
The criteria that limited the storage process from the beginning are the segregation defined as the phase separation of the PCM when this material has more than one component, and the subcooling that appears when a PCM starts to solidify at a temperature below its congealing temperature. These two processes must be studied during the material selection step and must be avoided or minimized. In addition, there are other drawbacks that will limit the implementation of PCM but they will appear afterwards. Regarding corrosion problems between PCMs and containers, the compatibility will appear afterwards and it must be studied before the implementation; cycling stability at long term: one substance used as PCM must be stablized over cycles; and finally, the leakage is one of the most important drawbacks because if this effect occurs, the effectivity of the system will decrease drastically. For that reason, the techniques to encapsulate or stabilize PCM are a key issue in PCM implementation.
2.3 Thermochemical Reactions
Thermochemical materials (TCM) are materials that can store energy by a reversible endothermic/exothermic reaction/process and the resulting reaction products are easily separated (usually a gas-solid system or a liquid-solid system) (Cot-Gores et al. 2012). First of all, the charging process is performed: applying heat, the material reacts and is separated into two parts: A + B. Then, when the storing process takes place, the heat is stored because the products are easily separated and the storage could be complete at low temperature. Finally, the discharging process is performed—as a reversible reaction, when products A + B are placed together, and under the suitable pressure and suitable temperature conditions to react, the energy is released again. This process is shown in Fig. 16.5.
TCM systems are those that are more energy-efficient, but they are being developed (N’Tsoukpoe et al. 2009). There are almost no real applications implemented in the market, but researchers and companies are making a huge effort to bypass the barriers of this technology.
Building systems that include TCM are described for seasonal storage, in order to store the overheating of summers to be used to heat buildings during the winter. Table 16.1 shows the properties required by TCM for building applications; these are the materials that present more technical requirements.
The main drawbacks of TCM storage are due to the corrosion, as with PCM and sensible storage, and due to the exhaustion of the solid-gas chemical reactions because they are poor regarding the heat and mass transfer performance in the reactive bed and present low thermodynamic efficiency of the basic cycle. In order to enhance the performance and well-operation of the storage system, the chemical reaction or the sorption process is the most important issue for storing energy through TCM. For that reason, precise control of the kinetics of the process/reaction as well as the boundary conditions of the system (pressure, temperature, water vapor flow, etc.) are priority issues. This challenge can be overcome by studying the details of the chemical reaction/sorption process.
3 Passive Technologies
3.1 Introduction
Buildings should be designed to provide thermal comfort for inhabitants with the minimal use of energy by the HVAC system (Soares et al. 2013). TES is a technology that can help achieve this objective, both with sensible and latent TES. The use of TES in the building components can significantly reduce the heating and cooling demands by absorbing solar radiation, internal heat gains, and/or free cooling strategies.
3.2 Sensible Passive Systems
3.2.1 Integration in Building Components
Passive storage with sensible heat storage is achieved mainly with high thermal mass materials, able to store bit amounts of energy, that give thermal stability and smooth indoor thermal fluctuations (Kosny et al. 2014). Examples of these materials are stone, rammed earth, concrete, stone, and brick. A comparison of rocks, clays, water and salts was carried out by Rempel and Rempel (2013); the authors compared the patterns of heat uptake of various materials and thicknesses (Fig. 16.6) to give an intuitive understanding of TES to architects and engineers (Fig. 16.7).
Solar walls can be used for energy savings in buildings (Saadatian et al. 2012). They can be classified as standard solar wall (Trombe wall), solar water wall, solar transwall, composite solar wall, and fluidized solar wall. Only the Trombe wall type and the solar water wall include storage in their operation.
A typical Trombe wall consists of a high thermal mass wall (concrete, stone, brick or earth wall) covered by glass, with an air channel in between (Stazi et al. 2012). Its operating principle can be seen in Fig. 16.8. The energy benefits of Trombe walls as a passive system can be found in the literature (Briga-Sá et al. 2014; Llovera et al. 2010). Solar water walls follow the same principle as the standard ones, but the massive part of it is replaced by water containers forming the wall (Adams et al. 2010).
3.3 Latent Passive Systems
3.3.1 Integration in the Building
As previously stated, the most promising methods for incorporating PCM in construction materials are direct incorporation, immersion, encapsulation, microencapsulation, and shape-stabilized (Cabeza 2015; Hawes et al. 1993; Memon 2014).
A first way to incorporate PCM in building envelopes is through wallboards, as shown in many studies recently published, both experimental and numerical (Cabeza 2015; Heier et al. 2015; Kosny et al. 2014). The factors that will influence the final efficiency of PCM-containing wallboards are how the PCM is incorporated into the wallboard, the orientation of the wall, the climatic conditions, the direct solar gains, the internal gains, the color of the surface, the ventilation rate, the PCM chosen and its phase change temperature, the temperature range of the phase change, and the latent energy per unit area of the wall.
Recommended studies are those of Kuznik et al. (Kuznik et al. 2008a, b; Kuznik and Virgone 2009) (Fig. 16.9), with a wallboard with 60 % microencapsulated paraffin melting at 22 °C that reduced the air temperature fluctuations in a room and the overheating effect of solar energy (Fig. 16.9); Shilei et al. (2006), with a wallboard with 26 wt% of fatty acid tested in China; Diaconu and Cruceru (Diaconu and Cruceru 2010; Diaconu 2011), with a three-layer sandwich insulating panel, tested experimentally showing a contribution to the annual energy savings and a reduction of the peak heating and cooling loads (Borreguero et al. 2010), with the inclusion of microencapsulated commercial paraffin (RT27) to gypsum blocks; and, more recently (Lee et al. 2015a, b), with a PCM thermal board, tested experimentally achieving up to 27 % average heat flux reductions and two to three hours of delayed peak heat transfer rate per unit of wall area (Biswas et al. 2014), with an innovative nano-PCM supported by expanded interconnected nano-sheets of gypsum wallboard developed and tested (Lai and Hokoi 2014), with the addition of aluminium honeycomb in a PCM wallboard.
Zhou et al. (2014) evaluated the factors influencing both interior and exterior PCM wallboards under periodically changing environments, with solar radiation also being considered. Thermal properties, such as melting temperature, melting temperature range, latent heat, thermal conductivity and surface heat transfer coefficients, were qualitatively optimized in two design criteria: inner surface temperature history, and diurnal thermal storage.
Other ways to include PCM in passive walls are the addition of PCM to cellulose insulation (Evers et al. 2010) (with a reduction of 9.2 % of the average peak heat flux), or coupled with vacuum-insulating panels (VIP) (Ahmad et al. 2006), the addition of PCM to a structural insulated panel (Medina et al. 2008) (with a peak heat flux decrease of 62 %, and a daily heat transfer across the system reduction of 38 %, when 20 wt% PCM is added), or in rigid polyurethane foams (Castellón et al. 2010; Yang et al. 2015), or the addition of PCM as a new layer (Castell et al. 2010; Jin et al. 2014; Lee et al. 2015a, b) (with up to 20 % reduction of energy consumption), even with shape stabilized PCM (Barreneche et al. 2014, 2013a, b; Zhou et al. 2011). The inclusion of PCM in bricks (Fig. 16.10) showed similar results, reducing the thermal amplitude of the room and increasing the time delay of the peak temperature in about 3 h (Silva et al. 2012).
PCM has also been added to concrete and mortar. Cabeza et al. (2007) added 10 % microencapsulated paraffin in concrete panels and tested it in two real-size cubicles, showing up to 7 °C of indoor temperature oscillation decrease; Entrop et al. (2011) added microencapsulated PCM in concrete floors with a reduction of the floor temperature of 7–16 %; Alawadhi and Alqallaf (2011) added PCM to a concrete roof with cone frustum holes (Fig. 16.11); and, more recently, Desai et al. (2014) added PCM to cementitious composites to be used as thin panels for façades; and Joulin et al. (2014) in cement-mortars.
PCM may also be added in shutters, window blinds and windows (which become the known translucent PCM walls). Soares et al. (2011) proposed a southward PCM shutter system to take advantage of the solar energy for winter nighttime heating, while Weinlaeder et al. (2011) used an interior sun protection system with vertical slats filled with PCM in office rooms. PCM was used together with a transparent insulation material (TIM) by Manz et al. (1997) to develop a selective optical transmittance solar radiation system. On the other hand, hollow glass bricks filled with PCM (Fig. 16.12) were studied for thermal management of an outdoor passive solar test room by Bontemps et al. (2011).
3.3.2 Environmental Impact
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a good tool for the environmental evaluation of buildings and has been used in residential and non-residential buildings and in civil engineering constructions, as well as for construction product selection and for construction systems and processes evaluation (Cabeza et al. 2014). PCM inclusion in buildings was assessed with LCA by De Gracia et al. (2010) and Castell et al. (2013), who showed that the addition of PCM (paraffin and salt hydrate) in the building envelope, although decreasing the energy consumption during operation, did not significantly reduce the global impact throughout the lifetime of the building. Aranda-Usón et al. (2013) concluded that PCM in buildings can reduce the environmental impact, but that the reduction is strongly influenced by the climate conditions and the PCM introduced.
4 Αctive Systems
4.1 Introduction
The use of TES in building active systems is an attractive and versatile solution for several applications, such as the implementation of renewable energy sources in the HVAC of the building for space heating and/or cooling, the improvement in the performance of the current installations, or the possible application of peak load shifting strategies. In this section, the use of TES in active systems will be discussed, highlighting the performance of free cooling systems and building integrated active systems, such as thermal activated building system (TABS), and heat pumps with TES.
4.2 Free-Cooling Systems
In a free-cooling system, the TES medium is charged when outdoor temperature is lower in comparison to indoor, and this stored cold is discharged when required by the cooling demand. The advantage of free cooling using TES in comparison to night ventilated cooling is that the cold stored can be discharged whenever it is needed by circulating ambient or room air through the storage (Waqas and Ud Din 2013). Since there is a small thermal gap between the charging source (low outdoor temperature at night) and the desired indoor temperature (thermal comfort), the use of PCM as the storage medium is recommended because of its high energy density within the phase change. As previously stated, the free cooling sequence consists of two modes of operation: the charging process, when the PCM is solidified, and the discharging process, when cooling is supplied to the inner environment from the storage (Fig. 16.13).
This operating principle allows the storage to be placed and designed in various locations according to the application or requirements. Several authors have investigated the implementation of the storage in external heat exchangers (Turnpenny et al. 2001; Zalba et al. 2004), or packed bed systems integrated into the ventilation system (Arkar and Medved 2007; Arkar et al. 2007), while others integrated the storage in a building component, such as ceilings (Yanbing et al. 2003).
These free cooling systems consume around 9 % less electrical energy than conventional air conditioning units of the same power; however, the initial investment is 10 % higher, with a payback period of around 3–4 years (Arkar and Medved 2007). The main obstacle that this technology faces is the difficulty of ensuring the full solidification of the PCM in certain climates or summer periods, in which the night temperatures do not drop below the phase change range long enough. This problem can be overcome by enhancing the thermal conductivity of the PCM and using appropriate control strategies.
4.3 Building Integrated Active Systems
The active systems based on TES have been implemented using external storage systems or integrating the storage in the building elements. This last option avoids the occupation of space for the implementation of these technologies and makes use of large heat transfer surfaces between the storage and the application. The integration of the TES in the building can be done using the core of the building (core, floor, walls) in external solar façades , in suspended ceilings, ventilation systems, PV systems and water tanks, as shown in Fig. 16.14.
Regarding the use of the core of the building for the integration of the TES system, several diverse systems have been developed and tested. Navarro et al. (2014a) tested an innovative active slab with PCM in its hollows, in which air is the heat transfer fluid. On the one hand, the system stores solar energy during sunny hours in winter and provides a heating supply when required by the demand; on the other, during the summer it solidifies the PCM located inside its hollows, using the low night temperatures and supplies cooling in peak load hours (Fig. 16.15).
4.3.1 Integration of the TES Into the Core of the Building
Other storage systems that are integrated into the core of the building are the TABS , which makes use of a building element as a TES system, such as ceilings or envelopes, usually adding embedded pipes through water flows (Fig. 16.16). They are usually charged with the low temperatures at night (free cooling source) and designed to discharge passively the cooling store in the building structure (Saelens et al. 2011). The large area of these systems allows a high heat transfer rate between the space and the structure, and even the low thermal difference between them, which makes the system appropriate for managing internal heat gains (Lehmann et al. 2007).
The typical daily cycle of the application of TABS is shown in Fig. 16.17, which is composed of the following steps:
-
Initial temperature of the room air and surface (1)
-
Heat sources are switched on, during the first interval of the heat sources releases its convection portion to the room air (1–2)
-
Radiative portion is absorbed by the storage capacity of the surfaces (2–3)
-
The heat sources are switched off at (3), and a similar pattern is found in the fast and slow heat discharge of the convective and radiative portion, respectively
-
The system is charged by the water pipes for the following daily cycle.
The activation of the building mass using pipes embedded in the main concrete structure significantly reduces the cooling peak load, which drives to a reduction in the cooling capacity of the HVAC systems up to 50 % (Rijksen et al. 2010). These systems based on sensible heat storage (typically the use of concrete) have been used commercially because of low investment costs and because it provides favorable comfort conditions (Lehmann et al. 2011). Moreover, in order to increase the TES capacity of the system, the addition of microencapsulated PCM to a concrete deck (Pomianowski et al. 2012) has been explored. Furthermore, TABS with two different shape-stabilized PCMs have been investigated. The two layers of PCM have different melting temperatures, so one is used for heating purposes and the other for cooling (Jin and Zhang 2011). Despite the benefits that the use of latent heat storage can provide to the performance of TABS, its inclusion in commercial systems has been limited because of the cost.
4.3.2 Integration of the TES in External Façades
The implementation of storage in external façades, such as double-skin façade, has been discussed to reduce the risk of overheating and increase the system efficiency in both winter and summer (Fallahi et al. 2010). Moreover, De Gracia et al. (2012) tested the thermal performance of a ventilated façade with macro-encapsulated PCM in its air chamber. During the heating season, the façade acts as a solar collector during the solar absorption period (Fig. 16.18).
Once the PCM is melted and the solar energy is needed for heating, the heat discharge period begins. This discharge period is performed until no more thermal energy is needed or can be provided by the system. The authors registered a reduction of 20 % in the electrical energy consumption of the installed HVAC systems because of the use of this solar-ventilated façade .
Furthermore, the same system was tested for cooling purposes, using low temperatures at night to charge the PCM and/or provide free cooling . The authors developed a numerical model and evaluated the performance of the system under different weather conditions (De Gracia et al. 2015). It was shown that the use of this latent heat-activated system is suitable for temperate climates according to the Köppen Geiger climate classification (Kottek et al. 2006), while the potential of the system to provide benefits in arid and equatorial climates is very limited.
4.3.3 Integration of the TES in Suspended Ceilings and Ventilation Systems
A significant number of old buildings need serious, energetic retrofitting in order to accomplish the standards defined by the European Directives (Directive 2010). Hence, the integration of TES components in the suspended ceiling, such as actively charged radiant panels filled with water (Roulet et al. 1999) or PCM (Koschenz and Lehmann 2004), is a good solution as a cooling or heating system.
Moreover, the TES units can be located in the ventilation ducts behind the suspended ceilings as in the work proposed by Yanbing et al. (2003), in which PCM is solidified during the nighttime and discharged during the peak load hours as in Navarro et al. (2014a). The system was tested, and it was proved that its use improves the thermal comfort level of the indoor environment. Furthermore, Monodraught Ltd developed and commercialized a cooling and ventilation system called “Cool-Phase” (Cool Phase 2014), which consists of an air-handling unit and a storage device based on macro-encapsulated panels of PCM. This equipment, shown in Fig. 16.19, can provide space heating by a heat recovery cycle and cooling, making use of low night temperatures.
4.3.4 Integration of the TES in the PV System
The storage implemented in the PV system provides two main benefits. On the one hand, it can profit from the heat behind the PV panels for heating purposes, and on the other, the PV panels increase their performance when cooled. The conventional aluminium-fined PV panel with natural ventilation can reduce the temperature rise of the PV; however, the use of a PV/PCM system can greatly reduce the temperature rise of the PV. The PCM should have a flash point considerably higher than the maximum operating temperature of the PV system, and it should be non-flammable and non-explosive (Abhat 1983). The use of PCM was shown to provide significant PV temperature control and thus increased electrical conversion efficiency (Huang 2006).
4.3.5 Integration of the TES in Water Tanks
Water tanks are a widely used TES device for solar systems or domestic hot water facilities, but because of the high volume they occupy, their integration into the building has only recently been addressed. This integration was done by architecturally including the storage in the living areas (Fig. 16.20), or by using ground-integrated tanks. The use of underground storage is justified if seasonal TES strategies are considered. There are four main types of underground systems for seasonal TES (The European Project EINSTEIN 2014) (Fig. 16.21): tank thermal energy storage (TTES); pit thermal energy storage (PTES); borehole thermal energy storage (BTES); and aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES).
4.4 Use of TES in Heat Pumps
The use of heat pumps with TES systems are presented as a promising technology to shift electrical loads from high-peak to off-peak periods, thus serving as a powerful tool in demand-side management (DSM) (Arteconi et al. 2013). The benefits of this technology are focused on the energy cost savings by using thermal energy stored during low-cost electricity tariffs. The incorporation of these systems in the buildings has been investigated both for space heating and cooling. The TES is implemented in the heat pumps, not only for load shifting, but for achieving important energy savings on the defrosting system of the outdoor unit, or for heat recovery applications as well (Moreno et al. 2014a, b).
PCM thermal energy storage systems were coupled to conventional heat pumps for space heating in Agyenim and Hewitt (2010), which concluded that due to the low thermal conductivity of the PCM, the average storage tank size needed to cover the heating demand of a semi-detached house was 1116 l, which ruled out the use of PCM for this application, unless the thermal conductivity is enhanced. On the other hand, if the PCM storage tank is implemented in a modern low-temperature heating system, such as that studied by Leonhardt and Müller (Leonhardt 2009), the switching between the on and off of the heat pump is reduced, which represents cost savings. Moreover, the heat pumps with PCM were also studied in combination with other energy sources, such as solar (Kaygusuz 1999; Niu et al. 2013) or geothermal energy (Benli and Durmus 2009).
As previously written, a PCM module is implemented in air source heat pumps to solve the frosting problem in the outdoor coil, which limits the air passage area and dramatically decreases the performance of the unit. Currently, the most widely used defrosting method consists of a reverse-cycle defrost, which means that one defrosting is required; the outdoor unit acts as a condenser; and the indoor unit as an evaporator, which is costly and produces discomfort in the inner environment. The PCM can be integrated in the cycle to absorb waste heat from the compressor and release this heat during the defrosting period (IEA 1990) (Fig. 16.22). This system increases the COP of the system, reduces the energy consumption for defrosting (Dong et al. 2011), and increases the thermal comfort of the indoor environment as well (Minglu et al. 2010).
The use of PCM in heat pumps for space cooling is based on the cold storage from the evaporator, and the later use of this cooling during peak-load hours. Ice has been used as the storage media, implemented in heat storage tanks (Fang et al. 2009) or spherical capsules packed beds (Fang et al. 2010). In addition, Moreno et al. (2014a, b) implemented two PCM tanks in a heat pump cycle, one connected to the evaporator (cold TES tank) and the other to the condenser (hot TES tank). This allows the system to store cold and heat at once in order to cover the demand and apply peak load shifting strategies during hot or cold periods.
The use of waste heat from the compression cycle of the heat pump during the cooling season is based on the concept of storing the heat released by the condenser in a PCM tank and using it for domestic hot water (Gu et al. 2004). The ability to totally or partially fulfill the demand of domestic hot water might contribute in an important reduction of the CO2 emissions in this field (Zhang et al. 2011).
5 Conclusions
This chapter provides the state of the art of the studied active and passive TES technologies integrated in the building sector, including sensible, latent, and thermochemical storage systems. Passive techniques are based on increasing the thermal inertia of envelopes and building elements, which provides thermal stability and hence reduces the energy consumption for space heating and cooling. The correct use of these passive systems requires temperate weather conditions, in which the storage can be passively discharged to the outer environment during nighttime in the cooling season, and enough solar radiation to be charged during the winter. Moreover, the inclusion of TES in active systems has been investigated for the implementation of renewable energies for space heating and/or cooling, for improving the performance of the current installations, and for using peak load-shifting strategies.
TES shows great potential for reducing the energy demand of buildings and/or improving the energy efficiency of their energy systems. Several groups and associations (i.e., IEA, RHC Platform, EASE) have identified this potential. However, some of challenges that have to be faced are reduction of the cost, increase of the compactness of the systems, increase of the energy density of the materials and systems, increase of the thermal conductivity of the materials, and development of new materials.
References
Abhat A (1983) Low temperature latent heat thermal energy storage: heat storage materials. Sol Energy 30:313–332
Adams S, Becker M, Krauss D, Gilman C (2010) Not a dry subject: optimizing water Trombe wall. In: ASE S (ed) SOLAR 2010 conference
Agyenim F, Hewitt N (2010) The development of a finned phase change material (PCM) storage system to take advantage of off-peak electricity tariff for improvement in cost of heat pump operation. Energy Build 42(9):1552–1560. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.03.027
Ahmad M, Bontemps A, Sallée H, Quenard D (2006) Thermal testing and numerical simulation of a prototype cell using light wallboards coupling vacuum isolation panels and phase change material. Energy Build 38:673–681
Alawadhi EM, Alqallaf HJ (2011) Building roof with conical holes containing PCM to reduce the cooling load: numerical study. Energy Convers Manag 52(8–9):2958–2964
Aranda-Usón A, Ferreira G, López-Sabirón AM, Mainar-Toledo MD, Zabalza Bribián I (2013) Phase change material applications in buildings: an environmental assessment for some Spanish climate severities. Sci Total Environ 444:16–25. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.012
Arkar C, Medved S (2007) Free cooling of a building using PCM heat storage integrated into the ventilation system. Sol Energy 81(9):1078–1087. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2007.01.010
Arkar C, Vidrih B, Medved S (2007) Efficiency of free cooling using latent heat storage integrated into the ventilation system of a low energy building. Int J Refrig 30(1):134–143. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2006.03.009
Arteconi A, Hewitt NJ, Polonara F (2013) Domestic demand-side management (DSM): role of heat pumps and thermal energy storage (TES) systems. Appl Therm Eng 51(1–2):155–165. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.09.023
Baetens R, Jelle BP, Gustavsen A (2010) Phase change materials for building applications: a state-of-the-art review. Energy Build 42:1361–1368
Barreneche C, De Gracia A, Serrano S, Navarro ME, Borreguero AM, Fernández AI, Cabeza LF (2013) Comparison of three different devices available in Spain to test thermal properties of building materials including phase change materials. Appl Energy 109:544–552. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84879270070&partnerID=40&md5=b9a5b9836401f86c9f005c65f1cb7569
Barreneche C, Fernández AI, Niubó M, Chimenos JM, Espiell F, Segarra M, Cabeza LF (2013) Development and characterization of new shape-stabilized phase change material (PCM)—polymer including electrical arc furnace dust (EAFD), for acoustic and thermal comfort in buildings. Energy Build 61:210–214. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84875178352&partnerID=40&md5=86e72298677da691830b12cdcfb601f5
Barreneche C, Navarro ME, Niubó M, Cabeza LF, Fernández AI (2014) Use of PCM-polymer composite dense sheet including EAFD in constructive systems. Energy Build 68(PARTA):1–6. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84886433203&partnerID=40&md5=fb540fb7b5cc6dd73a2a6cb22a664d64
Basecq V, Michaux G, Inard C, Blondeau P (2013) Short-term storage systems of thermal energy for buildings: a review. Adv Build Energy Res 7(1):66–119
Benli H, Durmuş A (2009) Evaluation of ground-source heat pump combined latent heat storage system performance in greenhouse heating. Energy Build 41(2):220–228. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.09.004
Biswas K, Lu J, Soroushian P, Shrestha S (2014) Combined experimental and numerical evaluation of a prototype nano-PCM enhanced wallboard. Appl Energy 131:517–529
Bontemps A, Ahmad M, Johannès K, Sallée H (2011) Experimental and modelling study of twin cells with latent heat storage walls. Energy Build 43(9):2456–2461
Borreguero A, Carmona M, Sanchez M, Valverde J, Rodriguez J (2010) Improvement of the thermal behavior of gypsum blocks by the incorporation of microcapsules containing PCMS obtained by suspension polymerization with an optimal core/coating mass ratio. Appl Therm Eng 30:1164–1169
Briga-Sá A, Martins A, Boaventura-Cunha J, Lanzinha J, Paiva A (2014) Energy performance of Trombe Walls. Adaptation of ISO 13790:2008(E) to the Portuguese reality. Energy Build 74:111–119
Cabeza L (2015) Advances in thermal energy storage systems. In: Cabeza J (ed) Methods and applications. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge
Cabeza LF, Castellón C, Nogués M, Medrano M, Leppers R, Zubillaga O (2007) Use of microencapsulated PCM in concrete walls for energy savings. Energy Build 39(2):113–119. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33845749671&partnerID=40&md5=9ea560a5ff7136bf555816b3b0c5c873
Cabeza LF, Castell A, Barreneche C, De Gracia A, Fernández AI (2011) Materials used as PCM in thermal energy storage in buildings: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(3):1675–1695
Cabeza LF, Rincón L, Vilariño V, Pérez G, Castell A (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:394–416. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84884633626&partnerID=40&md5=39e37dbc12cc2071136d75807458b360
Castell A, Martorell I, Medrano M, Pérez G, Cabeza LF (2010) Experimental study of using PCM in brick constructive solutions for passive cooling. Energy Build 42(4):534–540. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77649183812&partnerID=40&md5=892b975b0f63d8318c264e2d1eeabf63
Castell A, Menoufi K, de Gracia A, Rincón L, Boer D, Cabeza LF (2013) Life cycle assessment of alveolar brick construction system incorporating phase change materials (PCMs). Appl Energy 101:600–608. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84869869833&partnerID=40&md5=4fa882f68ee30f00e51a1520030acdb1
Castellón C, Medrano M, Roca J, Cabeza LF, Navarro ME, Fernández AI, Zalba B (2010) Effect of microencapsulatedphase change material in sandwich panels. Renew Energy 35(10):2370–2374
Cool Phase (2014) Natural cooling and low energy ventilation system. Available from http://www.cool-phase.net/
Cot-Gores J, Castell A, Cabeza LF (2012) Thermochemical energy storage and conversion: a-state-of-the-art review of the experimental research under practical conditions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(7):5207–5224. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84862739473&partnerID=40&md5=8b344aa8d631967b13fac135a9660879
De Gracia A, Rincón L, Castell A, Jiménez M, Boer D, Medrano M, Cabeza LF (2010) Life cycle assessment of the inclusion of phase change materials (PCM) in experimental buildings. Energy Build 42(9):1517–1523. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78651454787&partnerID=40&md5=bd9ae4dc9db35879be7f15c2086a992f
De Gracia A, Barreneche C, Farid MM, Cabeza LF (2011) New equipment for testing steady and transient thermal performance of multilayered building envelopes with PCM. Energy Build 43(12):3704–3709
De Gracia A, Navarro L, Castell A, Ruiz-Pardo A, Alvárez S, Cabeza LF (2012) Experimental study of a ventilated facade with PCM during winter period. Energy Build. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84869487163&partnerID=40&md5=74059d06d245d5c1a6b78902d38c784c
De Gracia A, Navarro L, Castell A, Cabeza LF (2015) Energy performance of a ventilated double skin facade with PCM under different climates. Energy Build 91:37–42
Del Barrio EP, Dauvergne JL, Morisson V (2009) A simple experimental method for thermal characterization of shape-stabilized phase change materials. Sol Energy Eng. Trans ASME 131(4):0410101–0410108
Delgado M, Lázaro A, Mazo J, Zalba B (2012) Review on phase change material emulsions and microencapsulated phase change material slurries: Materials, heat transfer studies and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:253–273
Desai D, Miller M, Lynch JP, Li VC (2014) Development of thermally adaptive engineered cementitious composite for passive heat storage. Constr Build Mater 67:366–372
Diaconu BM (2011) Thermal energy savings in buildings with PCM-enhanced envelope: influence of occupancy pattern and ventilation. Energy Build 43(1):101–107
Diaconu BM, Cruceru M (2010) Novel concept of composite phase change material wall system for year-round thermal energy savings. Energy Build 42(10):1759–1772
Directive 2010/31/EU (2010) 2010/31/EU: Directive of the European parliament and of the council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings. Available from 30 Oct 2012: http://www.epbd-ca.eu
Dong J, Jiang Y, Yao Y, Zhang X (2011) Operating performance of novel reverse-cycle defrosting method based on thermal energy storage for air source heat pump. J Cent South Univ Technol 18(6):2163–2169
Entrop AG, Brouwers HJH, Reinders AHME (2011) Experimental research on the use of micro-encapsulated phase change materials to store solar energy in concrete floors and to save energy in Dutch houses. Sol Energy 85(5):1007–1020
Evers AC, Medina MA, Fang Y (2010) Evaluation of the thermal performance of frame walls enhanced with paraffin and hydrated salt phase change materials using a dynamic wall simulator. Build Environ 45(8):1762–1768
Fallahi A, Haghighat F, Elsadi H (2010) Energy performance assessment of double-skin façade with thermal mass. Energy Build 42(9):1499–1509. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.03.020
Fang G, Liu X, Wu S (2009) Experimental investigation on performance of ice storage air-conditioning system with separate heat pipe. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 33(8):1149–1155. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.07.004
Fang G, Wu S, Liu X (2010) Experimental study on cool storage air-conditioning system with spherical capsules packed bed. Energy Build 42(7):1056–1062. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.018
Fernandez AI, Martinez M, Segarra M, Martorell I, Cabeza LF (2010) Selection of materials with potential in sensible thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 94(10):1723–1729. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955427486&partnerID=40&md5=57c2ce552a5eaba44202c57daf33dfc0
Gu Z, Liu H, Li Y (2004) Thermal energy recovery of air conditioning system—heat recovery system calculation and phase change materials development. Appl Therm Eng 24(17–18):2511–2526. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.03.017
Günther E, Hiebler S, Mehling H (2006) Determination of the heat storage capacity of PCM and PCM-objects as a function of temperature. Proc ECOSTOCK, 10th Int. Conference on Thermal Energy Storage
Hawes DW, Feldman D, Banu D (1993) Latent heat storage in building materials. Energy Build 20(1):77–86
Hed G, Bellander R (2006) Mathematical modelling of PCM air heat exchanger. Energy Build 38(2):82–89. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.04.002
Heier J, Bales C, Martin V (2015) Combining thermal energy storage with buildings—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:1305–1325
Huang M, Eames P, Norton B (2006) Experimental performance of phase change materials for limiting temperature rise building integrated photovoltaics. Sol Energy 80:1121–1130. Available from http://www.einstein-project.eu/fckeditor_files/D_9_2_EINSTEIN_leaflet_English.pdf
IEA (1990) Heat Pump Centre Newsletter
IEA (2010) Technology Roadmap. Solar Heating and Cooling
IEA (2012) Energy Technology Perspectives (ETP) 2012. International Energy Agency
Jin X, Zhang X (2011) Thermal analysis of a double layer phase change material floor. Appl Therm Eng 31(10):1576–1581. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.01.023
Jin X, Medina M, Zhang X (2014) On the placement of a phase change material thermal shield within the cavity of buildings walls for heat transfer rate reduction. Energy 73:780–786
Joulin A, Zalewski L, Lassue S, Naji H (2014) Experimental investigation of thermal characteristics of a mortar with or without a micro-encapsulated phase change material. Appl Therm Eng 66:171–180
Kaygusuz K (1999) Investigation of a combined solar–heat pump system for residential heating. Part 1: experimental results. Int J Energy Res 23:1213–1223
Khudhair AM, Farid MM (2004) A review on energy conservation in building applications with thermal storage by latent heat using phase change materials. Energy Convers Manag 45(2):263–275. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0141510020&partnerID=40&md5=afb9a447d9699dcde0d44119197faa4a
Koschenz M, Dorer V (1999) Interaction of an air system with concrete core conditioning. Energy Build 30(2):139–145. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00081-4
Koschenz M, Lehmann B (2004) Development of a thermally activated ceiling panel with PCM for application in lightweight and retrofitted buildings. Energy Build 36(6):567–578. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.029
Kosny J, Petrie T, Gawin D, Childs P, Desjarlais A, Christian J (2014) Energy savings potential in residential buildings
Kottek MJ, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World map of Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Mereorol Z 15:259–263
Kuznik F, Virgone J (2009) Experimental investigation of wallboard containing phase change material: data for validation of numerical modeling. Energy Build 41(5):561–570
Kuznik F, Virgone J, Noel J (2008) Optimization of a phase change material wallboard for building use. Appl Therm Eng 28(11–12):1291–1298
Kuznik F, Virgone J, Roux JJ (2008) Energetic efficiency of room wall containing PCM wallboard: a full-scale experimental investigation. Energy Build 40(2):148–156
Lai C, Hokoi S (2014) Thermal performance of an aluminum honeycomb wallboard incorporating microencapsulated PCM. Energy Build 73:37–47
Lee K, Medina M, Raith E, Sun X (2015a) Assessing the integration of a thin phase change material (PCM) layer in a residential building wall for heat transfer reduction and management. Appl Energy 137:699–706
Lee K, Medina M, Sun X (2015b) On the use of plug-and-play walls (PPW) for evaluating thermal enhancement technologies for building enclosures: Evaluation of a thin phase change material (PCM) layer. Energy Build 86:86–92
Lehmann B, Dorer V, Koschenz M (2007) Application range of thermally activated building systems tabs. Energy Build 39(5):593–598. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.09.009
Lehmann B, Dorer V, Gwerder M, Renggli F, Tödtli J (2011) Thermally activated building systems (TABS): energy efficiency as a function of control strategy, hydronic circuit topology and (cold) generation system. Appl Energy 88(1):180–191. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.08.010
Leonhardt C, Müller D (2009) Modelling of residential heating system using a phase change material storage system. In: Proceedings of the 7th Modelica Conference, pp 20–22. Como, Italy
Li L, Yan Q, Jin L, Yue L (2012) Preparation method of shape-stabilized PCM wall and experimental research of thermal performance. Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica 33(12):2135–2139
Llovera J, Potau X, Medrano M, Cabeza L (2010) Design and performance of energy-efficient solar residential house in Andorra. Appl Energy 88:1343–1353
Manz H, Egolf PW, Suter P, Goetzberger A (1997) TIM-PCM, external wall system for solar space heating and daylight. Sol Energy 61(6):369–379
Medina M, King J, Zhang M (2008) On the heat transfer rate reduction of structural insulated panels (SIPs) outfitted with phase change materials (PCMs). Energy 33(4):667–678
Mehling H, Cabeza L (2008) Heat and cold storage with PCM. Springer, Berlin. Retrieved from ISBN-13: 9783540685562
Memon S (2014) Phase change materials integrated in building walls: A state of the art review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31(2014):870–906
Minglu Q, Liang X, Deng S, Yiqiang J (2010) Improved indoor thermal comfort during defrost with a novel reverse-cycle defrosting method for air source heat pumps. Build Environ 45:2354–2361
Moreno P, Castell A, Solé C, Zsembinszki G, Cabeza LF (2014) PCM thermal energy storage tanks in heat pump system for space cooling. Energy Build 82:399–405. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84905819417&partnerID=40&md5=772d19eccde216de15ebe2f2d1aed4dc
Moreno P, Solé C, Castell A, Cabeza LF (2014) The use of phase change materials in domestic heat pump and air-conditioning systems for short term storage: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:1–13. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84905005142&partnerID=40&md5=32ea981f4780f4d5948103a4718b9ba4
N’Tsoukpoe KE, Liu H, Le Pierrès N, Luo L (2009) A review on long-term sorption solar energy storage. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2385–2396. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-68749105582&partnerID=40&md5=ac8244725fd2851c4b71bd2c45dfb995
Navarro ME, Martínez M, Gil A, Fernández AI, Cabeza LF, Py X (2011) Selection and characterization of recycled materials for sensible thermal energy storage. In: 30th ISES Biennial Solar World Congress 2011, SWC 2011, vol 6, pp 4875–4881. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84873840715&partnerID=40&md5=6c1dae385096f833c6631c7483d6019f
Navarro L, de Gracia A, Castell A, Alvarez S, Cabeza L (2014a) Experimental study of a prefabricated concrete slab with PCM. In: Eurotherm Seminar #99, Advances in Thermal Energy Storage
Navarro L, de Gracia A, Castell A, Alvarez S, Cabeza L (2014b) Experimental study of a prefabricated concrete slab with PCM. In: Proceedings of Eurotherm Seminar #99, Advances in Thermal Energy Storage
Niu F, Ni L, Yao Y, Yu Y, Li H (2013) Performance and thermal charging/discharging features of a phase change material assisted heat pump system in heating mode. Appl Therm Eng 58(1–2):536–541. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.04.042
Nomura T, Okinaka N, Akiyama T (2009) Impregnation of porous material with phase change material for thermal energy storage. Mater Chem Phys 115(2–3):846–850
Parameshwaran R, Kalaiselvam S, Harikrishnan S, Elayaperumal A (2012) Sustainable thermal energy storage technologies for buildings: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):2394–2433. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84858401061&partnerID=40&md5=c6d943a3bab67da38f3d55073ffaa4d2
Pavlov G, Olesen B (2011) Building thermal energy storage—concepts and applications. In: Roomvent Proceedings, 12th International conference on air distribution in rooms. Norway
Pomianowski M, Heiselberg P, Jensen RL (2012) Dynamic heat storage and cooling capacity of a concrete deck with PCM and thermally activated building system. Energy Build 53:96–107. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.07.007
Rempel AR, Rempel AW (2013) Rocks, clays, water, and salts: highly durable, infinitely rechargeable, eminently controllable thermal batteries for buildings. Geosciences 3:63–101
Rijksen DO, Wisse CJ, van Schijndel AWM (2010) Reducing peak requirements for cooling by using thermally activated building systems. Energy Build 42(3):298–304. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.09.007
Roulet CA, Rossy JP, Roulet Y (1999) Using large radiant panels for indoor climate conditioning. Energy Build 30(2):121–126. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00079-6
Saadatian O, Sopian K, Lim C, Asim N, Sulaiman M (2012) Trombe walls: a review of opportunities and challenges in research and development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(8):6340–6351
Saelens D, Parys W, Baetens R (2011) Energy and comfort performance of thermally activated building systems including occupant behavior. Build Environ 46(4):835–848. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.012
Sharma SD, Sagara K (2005) Latent heat storage materials and systems: a review. Int J Green Energy 2(1):1–56
Shilei L, Neng Z, Guohui F (2006) Impact of phase change wall room on indoor thermal environment in winter. Energy Build 38(1):18–24
Silva T, Vicente R, Soares N, Ferreira V (2012) Experimental testing and numerical modelling of masonry wall solution with PCM incorporation: a passive construction solution. Energy Build 49:235–245
Soares N, Samagaio A, Vicente R, Costa J (2011) Numerical simulation of a PCM shutter for buildings space heating during the winter. In: World renewable energy congress, pp 8–13. Linköping, Sweden
Soares N, Costa JJ, Gaspar AR, Santos P (2013) Review of passive PCM latent heat thermal energy storage systems towards buildings’ energy efficiency. Energy Build 59:82–103
Solaresbauen-Grundlagen. Sonnenhaus-Institu e.V. Available from: www.sonnenhaus-institut.de (2014)
Stazi F, Mastrucci A, di Perna C (2012) The behaviour of solar walls in residential buildings with different insulation levels: an experimental and numerical study. Energy Build 47:217–229
The European Project EINSTEIN (2014) Effective Integration of Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage Systems IN existing buildings. Available from http://www.einstein-project.eu/fckeditor_files/D_9_2_EINSTEIN_leaflet_English.pdf
Turnpenny JR, Etheridge DW, Reay DA (2001) Novel ventilation system for reducing air conditioning in buildings. Part II: testing of prototype. Appl Therm Eng 21(12):1203–1217. doi:10.1016/S1359-4311(01)00003-5
Tyagi VV, Buddhi D (2007) PCM thermal storage in buildings: a state of the art. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11:1146–1166
Tyagi VV, Kaushik SC, Tyagi SK, Akiyama T (2011) Development of phase change materials based microencapsulated technology for buildings: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1373–1391
Ürge-Vorsatz D, Cabeza LF, Serrano S, Barreneche C, Petrichenko K (2015) Heating and cooling energy trends and drivers in buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41(0):85–98. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.039
Waqas A, Ud Din Z (2013) Phase change material (PCM) storage for free cooling of buildings—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:607–625. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.034
Weinlaeder H, Koerner W, Heidenfelder M (2011) Monitoring results of an interior sun protection system with integrated latent heat storage. Energy Build 43(9):2468–2475
Yanbing K, Yi J, Yinping Z (2003) Modeling and experimental study on an innovative passive cooling system—NVP system. Energy Build 35(4):417–425. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00141-X
Yang C, Fischer L, Maranda S, Worlitschek J (2015) Rigid polyurethane foams incorporated with phase change materials: A state-of-the-art review and future research pathways. Energy Build 87:25–36
Zalba B, Marín JM, Cabeza LF, Mehling H (2003) Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications. Appl Therm Eng 23(3):251–283. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0037289573&partnerID=40&md5=7a2e981c4d5bec884b0a0e58a47ba49f
Zalba B, Marín JM, Cabeza LF, Mehling H (2004) Free-cooling of buildings with phase change materials. Int J Refrig 27(8):839–849. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-10044257361&partnerID=40&md5=2e6493def785d26d2ce79d3182a819bb
Zhang P, Ma ZW, Wang RZ (2010) An overview of phase change material slurries: MPCS and CHS. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:598–614
Zhang X, Yu S, Yu M, Lin Y (2011) Experimental research on condensing heat recovery using phase change material. Appl Therm Eng 31(17–18):3736–3740. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.03.040
Zhou G, Yang Y, Xu H (2011) Performance of shape-stabilized phase change material wallboard with periodical outside heat flux waves. Appl Energy 88:2113–2121
Zhou D, Shire G, Tian Y (2014) Parametric analysis of influencing factors in phase change material wallboard (PCMW). Appl Energy 119:33–42
Acknowledgements
This study was partially funded by the Spanish Government (ENE2011-22722, ENE2011-28269-C03-02, and ULLE10-4E-1305). The authors would like to thank the Catalan Government for the quality accreditation given to their research group GREA (2014 SGR 123) and DIOPMA (2014 SGR 1543). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013), under grant agreement No. PIRSES-GA-2013-610692 (INNOSTORAGE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Gracia, A., Barreneche, C., Fernández, A.I., Cabeza, L.F. (2016). The State of the Art for Technologies Used to Decrease Demand in Buildings: Thermal Energy Storage . In: Boemi, SN., Irulegi, O., Santamouris, M. (eds) Energy Performance of Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20831-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20831-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20830-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20831-2
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)