Abstract
When employing factor analysis a major problem confronting researchers is the determination of how many components to retain for subsequent investigation. Many marketing scholars address this issue by automatically invoking the Kaiser-Guttman, or eigenvalue-greater-than-one, procedure. Yet this procedure is not without certain limitations. The authors therefore propose an alternative measure, a probability test for the significance of eigenvalues, based upon a random intercepts model. Preliminary results of the application of the model on marketing and psychology data are presented.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Principal Component Analysis
- Random Intercept
- Factor Problem
- Marketing Scholar
- Multivariate Behavioral Research
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Acito, Franklin and Ronald D. Anderson (1980), "A Monte Carlo Comparison of Factor Analytic Methods," Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (May), 228–36.
—, —, and Jack L. Engledow (1980), "A Simulation Study of Methods for Hypothesis Testing in Factor Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (September), 141–50.
Cattell, Raymond B. (1952), Factor Analysis. New York: Harper and Brothers.
—, and S. Vogelmann (1977), "A Comprehensive Trial of the Scree and KG Criteria for Determining the Number of Factors," Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12 (July), 289–325.
Davis, Frederick B. (1944), "Fundamental Factors of Comprehension in Reading," Psychometrika, 9 (September), 185–97.
Feller, William (1966), An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Fleishman, Edwin A. and Walter E. Hempel, Jr. (1954), "Changes in Factor Structure of a Complex Psychomotor Test as a Function of Practice," Psychometrika, 19 (September), 239–52.
Green, Paul E. (1978), Analyzing Multivariate Data. Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press.
Hakstian, A. Ralph and Victor J. Muller (1973), "Some Notes on the Number of Factors Problem," Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8 (October), 461–75.
—, W. Todd Rogers, and Raymond B. Cattell (1982), "The Behavior of Number-of-Factors Rules with Simulated Data," Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17 (April), 193–219.
Harman, Harry H. (1976), Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hornik, Jacob (1980), "Quantitative Analysis of Visual Perception of Printed Advertisements," Journal of Advertising Research, 20 (December), 41–8.
Kaiser, Henry F. (1960), "The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis," Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (Spring), 141–51.
— (1970), "A Second Generation Little Jiffy," Psychometrika, 35 (December), 401–15.
—, and John Rice (1974), "Little Jiffy Mark IV," Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34 (Spring), 111–17.
Karlin, J. E. (1941), "Music Ability," Psychometrika, 6 (February), 61–5.
Mukherjee, Bishwa N. (1971), "A Factor Analysis of Some Qualitative Attributes of Coffee," in Multivariate Analysis in Marketing: Theory and Application. David A. Aaker (ed.), Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 245–51.
Pandit, Vinay Y. (1978), "Data Breeding: Estimation of Micro-Data in an Incomplete Data Base." Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, Columbia University.
Perreault, Jr., William D. and Frederick A. Russ (1976), "Physical Distribution Service in Industrial Purchase Decisions," Journal of Marketing, 40 (April), 3–10.
Stephenson, William (1963), "Public Images of Public Utilities," Journal of Advertising Research, 3 (December), 34–9.
Stewart, David W. (1981), "The Application and Misapplication of Factor Analysis in Marketing Research," Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 51–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hubbard, R., Pandit, V. (2015). Determining Significant Principal Components: a Probability Test For Eigenvalues. In: Lindquist, J.D. (eds) Proceedings of the 1984 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16973-6_98
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16973-6_98
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16972-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16973-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)