Abstract
The term “perspective,” deriving from the Latin perspicere (to see distinctly), indicates a technique of graphic representation whose rules were established mainly by the artists and mathematicians of the Renaissance. The term is a vernacular form of the noun perspectiva, which in Medieval Latin designated the science of vision, translating the Greek optiké. The philosophers of “perspective,” devoted to the study of vision from the ninth to the fourteenth century, investigated both physiological aspects, especially in the Arab world, and mathematical ones, retaining the ancient threefold division of the discipline into “optics” (direct vision), “catoptrics” (reflected vision), and “dioptrics” (refracted vision). This science, called perspectiva naturalis or communis, dealt with the visual and light rays propagating in a straight line, as established by a fundamental axiom of Euclidean optics (Euclid 2007, Catoptrics, postulates I and II). The artists and mathematicians of the Renaissance applied its principles to the representation of the visible world, codifying the rules for a science of drawing that profoundly influenced the development of the applied arts and sciences in the modern age. Lorenzo Ghiberti described it as “a part of perspective pertaining to painting,” Piero della Francesca called it prospectiva pingendi (painting perspective), Jean Pelerin perspectiva artificialis (artificial perspective), and Daniele Barbaro perspectiva pratica (practical perspective): all these definitions converge on the basic concept of the practical application of optical laws to pictorial representation of the visible world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Primary Literature
Aguilonius (François d’Aguillon). 1613. Opticorum libri sex. Moretus: Antwerp. Officina Plantiniana.
Aleaume, Jeaques. 1643. Introduction a la perspective, ensemble a l’usage du compas optique et perspective [1628]. In La perspective speculative et pratique du Sieur Aleaume, ed. Migon, Etienne. M. Tavernier et F. Langlois: Paris.
Alhazen (AbūʿAlī al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Haytham). 1572. Opticae Thesaurus Alhazeni arabis libri septem... item Vitellionis Thuringopoloni libri X..., ed. F. Risner. Basel. Facsimile edition: 1972. Ed. D. C. Lindberg. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.
Alhazen (AbūʿAlī al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Haytham). 1989. The optics of Ibn Al-Haytham. Books I–III: On direct vision, ed. A.I. Sabra. London: Warburg Institute.
Alhazen (AbūʿAlī al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Haytham). 2001. Alhacen’s theory of visual perception, a critical edition, with English translation and commentary of the first three books of Alhacen’s De aspectibus, the medieval Latin version of Ibn al-Haytham’s Kitab al-Manazir, ed. A.M. Smith. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Baldinucci, Filippo. 1975. Notizie dei professori del disegno da Cimabue in qua, ed. Barocchi, P., and Boschetto, A. Florence, 1681–1728, reprint, 7 vols, with appendix. Eurografica: Florence.
Del Monte, Guidobaldo. 1600. Perspectivae libri sex. Girolamo Concordia: Pesaro.
Dürer, Albrecht. 1525. Underweysung der Messung mit dem Zirckel und Richtscheyt, in Linien, Ebenen, unnd gantzen Corporen, ed. A. Jaeggli. Nüremberg: H. Formschneyder. Enlarged edition: 1538. Nuremberg. Facsimile edition: 1966. Zurich: J. Stocker-Schmid.
Dürer, Albrecht. 1527. Etliche Underricht zuvon Befestigung der Stett, Schloss unnd Flecken. Norimberga .
Dürer, Albrecht. 1528. Hjerinn sind begriffen vier Bücher von menschlicher Proportion, Nüremberg, ed. facsimile, Verlag Dr. Alfons Uhl, Nördlingen 1996 (cit. 1528).
Dürer, Albrecht. 1532. Institutioes geometricae, a cura di J. Camerarius. In aedibus viduae Durerianae: Parigi.
Leonardo da Vinci. 1995. In Libro di pittura. Codice Urbinate lat. 1270 nella Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ed. C. Pedretti, C. Vecce. 2 vols. Florence: Giunti.
Manetti, Antonio di Tuccio. 1976. Vita di Filippo Brunelleschi, preceduta da la novella del grasso, ed. D. De Robertis. Milan: Il Polifilo.
Migon, Etienne 1643. La perspective speculative et pratique du Sieur Aleaume. M. Tavernier et F. Langlois: Paris.
Niceron, Jean François. 1646. Thaumaturgus opticus. Paris: Langlois.
Ozanam, Jacques. 1691. Dictionnaire des mathematique ou idée generale des mathématiques. Paris: Chez Estienne Michallet.
Ptolemy. 1568. Federici Commandini Urbinatis in Planisphaerium Ptolemaei commentarius. Venice: Aldus.
Serlio, Sebastiano. 1545. Il primo libro d’architettura [di geometria]. Il secondo libro di Perspettiva. French Trans. J. Martin. Paris.
Vasari, Giorgio. 1973. Le vite de’ più eccellenti pittori scultori ed architettori, Florence 1550 and 1568. In Le opere di Giorgio Vasari, ed. G. Milanesi. 9 vols. Florence: Sansoni.
Vaulezard, Jean-Louis de. 1631. Abregé ou raciurcy de la perspective par l’imitation … Paris.
Secondary Literature
Arrighi, Gino. 1967. Un estratto dal “De visu” di M° Grazia de’ Castellani (dal Codice Ottoboniano latino 3307 della Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana). Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi XXII: 44–58. (cit. 1967c).
Arrighi, Gino. 1968. La matematica in Firenze nel Rinascimento. Il Codice Ottoboniano Latino 3307 della Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana. Physis 10: 70–82.
Camerota, Filippo. 2016. I “sei libri di prospettiva” di Vincenzo Scamozzi: il grande assente della letteratura prospettica rinascimentale. In Vincenzo Scamozzi teorico europeo, ed. Franco Barbieri et al., 18–39. Vicenza: Accademia Olimpica.
Camerota, Filippo, et al., eds. 2015. Piero della Francesca: il disegno tra arte e scienza, catalogo della mostra. Milan: Skira.
Federici Vescovini, Graziella. 1960. Problemi di fisica aristotelica in un maestro del sec. XIV: Biagio Pelacani da Parma. Rivista di Filosofia 51: 178–182.
Federici Vescovini, Graziella. 1965a. Studi sulla prospettiva medievale. Turin: G. Giappichelli.
Federici Vescovini, Graziella. 1965b. Contributo per la storia di Alhazen in Italia: il volgarizzamento del Ms. Vaticano 4595 ed il Commentario Terzo del Ghiberti. Rinascimento N.S. 5: 17–49.
Federici Vescovini, Graziella. 1980. La prospettiva del Brunelleschi, Alhazen e Biagio Pelacani a Firenze. In Filippo Brunelleschi. La sua opera e il suo tempo, ed. Centro Di. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi, Firenze 16–22 ottobre 1977, 333–348. Florence: Centro Di.
Lindberg, D.C. 1976. Theories of vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Ludwig, Heinrich. 1882. Leonardo da Vinci. Das Buch von der Malerei. Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller.
Panofsky, Erwin.1927. Die Perspektive als “symbolische Form”. Vortrage der Bibliothek Warburg, 1924–5, 258–330. Leipzig/Berlin: Teubner. Italian edition: Panofsky, Erwin. 1977. La prospettiva come forma simbolica, ed. G. Neri and M. Dalai Emiliani. Milan: Feltrinelli.
Panofsky, Erwin. 1940. The codex Huygens and Leonardo da Vinci’s art theory. The Pierpont Morgan library codex M.A. 1139. London: Warburg Institute.
Panofsky, Erwin. 1956. Galileo as a critic of the arts. Aesthetic attitude and scientific thought. Isis 47: 3–15. Italian edition: Panofsky, Erwin. 1978. Galileo come critico delle arti. Atteggiamento estetico e pensiero scientifico. In Galileo, ed. A. Carugo. Milan: ISEDI.
Raynaud, Dominique. 1998. L’hypothèse d’Oxford. Paris: PUF.
Ronchi, Vasco. 1983. Storia della luce. Da Euclide a Einstein. Rome: Laterza.
Smith, A. Mark. 1999. Ptolemy and the foundations of ancient mathematical optics: A source based guided study. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Tanturli, Giuliano. 1980. Rapporti del Brunelleschi con gli ambienti letterari fiorentini. In Filippo Brunelleschi. La sua opera e il suo tempo, Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi, Firenze 16–22 ottobre 1977, 125–144. Florence: Centro Di.
Van Helden, Albert. 1977. The invention of the telescope, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 67.4. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Wilde, Emil. 1990. Geschichte der Optik: vom Ursprunge dieser Wissenschaft bis auf die gegenwärtige Zeit. Vaduz: Sänding Reprint Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Camerota, F. (2022). Perspective in Renaissance Philosophy. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_680
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_680
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14168-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14169-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities