Abstract
The authors have investigated ways of learning in different cultures for several decades. This chapter describes some of the methodological problems we have faced, and some of our findings. In particular, the chapter notes what types of comparisons of learning can be justified, and the analytic methods appropriate for conducting such comparisons.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Beishuizen, J.J.; Hof, E.; van Putten, C.M.; Bouwmeeter, S. & Asscher, J.J. (2001): ‘Students’ and Teachers’ Cognitions about Good Teachers’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.71, No.2, pp.185-202.
Berry, John W. (1989): ‘Imposed Emics – Derived Etics: The Operationalisation of a Compelling Idea’. International Journal of Psychology, Vol.24, No.6, pp.721-735.
Biggs, John B. (1979): ‘Individual Differences in Study Processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes’. Higher Education, Vol.8, No.4, pp. 381-394.
Biggs, John B. (1987): Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, John B. (1996): ‘Western Misperceptions of Confucian-heritage Learning Culture’, in Watkins, David A. &. Biggs, John B. (eds.), The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological and Contextual Influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, pp.45-67.
Brown, Ann L. (1992): ‘Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges for Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings’. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol.2, No.2, pp.141-178.
Chan, Carol K.K. & Rao, Nirmala (eds.) (2009): Revisiting the Chinese Learner: Changing Contexts, Changing Education. CERC Studies in Comparative Education 25, Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, and Dordrecht: Springer.
Dahlin, Bo & Watkins, David (2000): ‘The Role of Repetition in the Processes of Memorising and Understanding: A Comparison of the Views of German and Chinese Secondary School Students in Hong Kong’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.70, No.1, pp. 65-84.
Ehindero, O.J. (1990): ‘A Discriminant Function Analysis of Study Strategies, Logical Reasoning Ability and Achievement across Major Teaching Undergraduate Curricula’. Research in Education, Vol.44, No.1, pp.1-11.
Entwistle, Noel J. & Ramsden, Paul (1983): Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
Gao, Lingbiao & Watkins, David A. (2001): ‘Identifying and Assessing the Conceptions of Teaching of Secondary School Physics Teachers in China’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.71, No.3, pp. 443-469.
Ginsberg, E. (1992): ‘Not just a Matter of English’, HERDSA News, Vol.14, No.1, pp.6-8.
Glass, Gene V.; McGaw, Barry & Smith, Mary Lee (1981): Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Ho, Irene T. (2001): ‘Are Chinese Teachers Authoritarian?’, in Watkins, David A. & Biggs, John B. (eds.), Teaching the Chinese Learner: Psychological and Pedagogical Perspectives. Hong Kong: Comparative Edu cation Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, pp.99-114.
Huang, Rongjin & Leung, Frederick K.S. (2002): ‘How Pythagoras' Theorem is Taught in Czech Republic, Hong Kong and Shanghai: A Case Study’. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, Vol.34, No.6, pp. 268-277.
Hui, C. Harry & Triandis, Harry C. (1985): ‘Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology: A Review and Comparison of Strategies’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol.16, No.2, pp.131-152.
Jin, Lixian & Cortazzi, Martin (1998): ‘Expectations and Questions in Intercultural Classrooms’. Intercultural Communication Studies, Vol.7, No.2, pp.37-62.
Kember, David & Gow, Lyn (1991): ‘A Challenge to the Anecdotal Stereotype of the Asian Student’. Studies in Higher Education, Vol.16, No.2, pp.117-128.
Kember, David & Gow, Lyn (1994): ‘Orientations to Teaching and their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning’. Journal of Higher Education, Vol.65, No.1, pp.58-74.
Kim, Uichol & Berry, John W. (eds.) (1993): Indigenous Psychologies: Research and Experience in Cultural Context. London: Sage.
Lee, Wing On (1996): ‘The Cultural Context for Chinese Learners’, in Watkins, David A. & Biggs, John B. (eds.), The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological and Contextual Influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, pp. 25-41.
Li, Jin (2001): ‘Chinese Conceptualization of Learning’. Ethos, Vol.29, No.2, pp.111-137.
Li, Jin (2009): ‘Learning to Self-Perfect: Chinese Beliefs about Learning’, in Chan, Carol K.K. & Rao, Nirmala (eds.), Revisiting the Chinese Learner: Changing Contexts, Changing Education. CERC Studies in Comparative Education 25, Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, and Dordrecht: Springer, pp.35-69.
Martin, M.O.; Mullis, I.V.S.; Foy, P. & Stanco, G.M. (2012): TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. Chesnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Marton, Ference (1981): ‘Phenomenography: Describing Conceptions of the World around Us’. Instructional Science, Vol.10, No.2, pp.177-200.
Marton, Ference & Booth, Shirley (1997): Learning and Awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marton, Ference & Säljö, Roger (1976): ‘On Qualitative Differences in Learning – I: Outcome and Process’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.46, No.1, pp.4-11.
Marton, Ference; Dall’Alba, Gloria & Tse, Lai Kun (1996): ‘Memorizing and Understanding: The Keys to the Paradox?’, in Watkins, David A. & Biggs, John B. (eds.), The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological and Contextual Influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, pp.69-83.
Marton, Ference; Watkins, David A. & Tang, Catherine (1997): ‘Discontinuities and Continuities in the Experience of Learning: An Interview Study of High-School Students in Hong Kong’. Learning and Instruction, Vol.7, No.1, pp.21-48.
Mullis, I.V.S.; Martin, M.O. & Foy, P. (2008): TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I.V.S.; Martin, M.O.; Foy, P. & Drucker, K.T. (2012): PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Nunnally, Jum C. (1978): Psychometric Theory. 2nd edition, New York: McGraw Hill.
OECD (2010): PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and can Do – Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Omokhodion, J. Otibhor (1989): ‘Classroom Observed: The Hidden Curriculum in Lagos, Nigeria’. International Journal of Educational Development, Vol.9, No.2, pp.99-110.
Richardson, John T.E. (1994): ‘Cultural Specify of Approaches to Studying in Higher Education: A Literature Survey’. Higher Education, Vol.27, No.4, pp.449-468.
Rosenthal, R. & DiMatteo, M.R. (2001): ‘Meta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews’. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.52, No.1, pp.59-82.
Schmeck, Ronald R. (ed.) (1988): Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. New York: Plenum.
Stigler, James W. & Hiebert, James (1999): The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. New York: Free Press.
Triandis, Harry C. (1972): The Analysis of Subjective Culture. New York: John Wiley.
van Aalst, Jan (2010): ‘Gaining an Insider Perspective on Learning Physics in Hong Kong’, in Gomez, K.; Lyons, L. & Radinky, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences Chicago: International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp. 881-888.
van de Vijver, Fons & Leung, Kwok (1997): Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. London: SAGE.
Wallace, John & Chou, Ching-Yang (2001). ‘Similarity and Difference: Student Cooperation in Taiwanese and Australian Science Classrooms.’ Science Education, Vol.85, No.6, pp.694-711.
Watkins, David A. (1998): ‘Assessing Approaches to Learning: A Cross-Cultural Perspective on the Study Process Questionnaire’, in Dart, Barry & Boulton-Lewis, Gillian (eds.), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, pp.124-144.
Watkins, David A. (2001): ‘Correlates of Approaches to Learning: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis’, in Sternberg, Robert & Zhang, Lifang (eds.), Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.165-196.
Watkins, David A. & Biggs, John B. (eds.) (1996): The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological and Contextual Influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
Watkins, David A. & Regmi, Murari (1992): ‘How Universal are Student Conceptions of Learning? A Nepalese Investigation’. Psychologia, Vol.35, No.2, pp.101-110.
Watkins, David A. & Regmi, Murari (1995): ‘Assessing Approaches to Learning in Non-Western Cultures: A Nepalese Conceptual Validity Study’. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol.20, No.2, pp.203-212.
Watkins, David A.; Regmi, Murari & Astilla, Estela (1991): ‘The Asian-Learner-as-a-Rote-Learner Stereotype: Myth or Reality?’. Educational Psychology, Vol.11, No.1, pp.21-34.
Watkins, David A. & Zhang, Q. (2006). ‘The good teacher: a cross-cultural perspective,’ in Inerney, D.M., Dowson, M. & van Etten, S. (eds.), Effective Schools. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, pp.185-204.
Wong, Ngai-Ying (2004): ‘The CHC Learner’s Phenomenon: Its Implications on Mathematics Education’, in Fan, L.H., Wong, N.Y., Cai, J.F. & Li, S.Q. (eds.), How Chinese Learn Mathematics: Perspectives from Insiders. Singapore: World Scientific, pp.503-534.
Wong, Ngai-Ying; Lin, Wai-Ying & Watkins, David A. (1996): ‘Cross-Cultural Validation of Models of Approaches to Learning: An Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis’. Educational Psychology, Vol.16, No.2, pp.317- 327.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watkins, D.A., van Aalst, J. (2014). Comparing Ways of Learning. In: Bray, M., Adamson, B., Mason, M. (eds) Comparative Education Research. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05594-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05594-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05593-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05594-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)