Abstract
The bioethics of research involving children has been, and remains, the subject of considerable debate and sometimes controversy. Codes and guidelines for ethical practice exist at national and international levels, but there remains debate on key issues among bioethicists, researchers, and clinicians. While codes for ethical research, such as the Nuremberg Code, sought to protect children from research and experimentation, there is now recognition of the potential benefits of research with children. The aim of ethics guidelines is now to protect children within research. Yet there remains division on critical issues of informed consent and children’s competence to decide whether or not they wish to participate in research or experimentation. While issues of consent and competence are essential to debates about bioethics, equally important are the ways in which methodology and method intersect with bioethics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alderson, P. (2007). Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care treatment and research. Social Science & Medicine, 65(11), 2272–2283.
Alderson, P., & Morrow, M. (2011). Ethics, social research and consulting with children and young people. Essex: Barnardos.
Beazley, H., Bessell, S., Ennew, J., & Waterson, R. (2009). The right to be properly researched: Research with children in a messy, real world. Children’s Geographies, 7(4), 365–378.
Boyden, J., & Ennew, J. (1997). Children in focus: A manual for participatory research with children. Stockholm: Radda Barnen.
Danby, S., & Farrell, A. (2004). Accounting for young children’s competence in educational research: New perspectives on research ethics. The Australian Educational Researcher, 31(3), 35–49.
Docket, S., Perry, B., & Kearney, E. (2013). Promoting children’s informed assent in research participation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(7), 802–828.
Graham, A., Powell, M., Taylor, N., Anderson, D., Fitzgerald, R. (2013). Ethical Research Involving Children. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti.
Lederer, S. (2004). Research without borders: The origins of Helsinki. In V. Roelcke & G. Maio (Eds.), Twentieth century ethics of human subjects research: Historical perspectives on values, practices, and regulations (pp. 199–218). Munich: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Nadav, D. (2004). The “Death Dance of Lubeck”: Julius Moses and the German guidelines for human experimentation, 1930. In V. Roelcke & G. Maio (Eds.), Twentieth century ethics of human subjects research: Historical perspectives on values, practices, and regulations (pp. 129–135). Munich: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Woodhead, M., & Faulkner, D. (2008). Subjects, objects or participants? Dilemmas of psychological research with children. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 10–39). New York: Routledge.
Further Readings
Graham, A., Powell, M., Taylor, N., Anderson, D. & Fitzgerald, R. (2013). Ethical research involving children. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti. Available at http://childethics.com/. Viewed 8 May 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bessell, S. (2015). Children: Research. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_75-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_75-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities