Skip to main content

The Benefits of Interaction Constraints in Distributed Autonomous Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems (DARS 2022)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics ((SPAR,volume 28))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

The design of distributed autonomous systems often omits consideration of the underlying network dynamics. Recent works in multi-agent systems and swarm robotics alike have highlighted the impact that the interactions between agents have on the collective behaviours exhibited by the system. In this paper, we seek to highlight the role that the underlying interaction network plays in determining the performance of the collective behaviour of a system, comparing its impact with that of the physical network. We contextualise this by defining a collective learning problem in which agents must reach a consensus about their environment in the presence of noisy information. We show that the physical connectivity of the agents plays a less important role than when an interaction network of limited connectivity is imposed on the system to constrain agent communication. Constraining agent interactions in this way drastically improves the performance of the system in a collective learning context. Additionally, we provide further evidence for the idea that ‘less is more’ when it comes to propagating information in distributed autonomous systems for the purpose of collective learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We found that 20 agents were sufficient to complete the task with performance similar to that of 50 agents.

References

  1. Bechon, P., Slotine, J.J.: Synchronization and quorum sensing in a swarm of humanoid robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.2952 (2012)

  2. Brambilla, M., Ferrante, E., Birattari, M., Dorigo, M.: Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective. Swarm Intell. 7(1), 1–41 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crosscombe, M., Lawry, J.: A model of multi-agent consensus for vague and uncertain beliefs. Adapt. Behav. 24(4), 249–260 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crosscombe, M., Lawry, J.: Collective preference learning in the best-of-n problem. Swarm Intell. 15(1), 145–170 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crosscombe, M., Lawry, J.: The impact of network connectivity on collective learning. In: Matsuno, F., Azuma, S., Yamamoto, M. (eds.) DARS 2021. SPAR, vol. 22, pp. 82–94. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92790-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Douven, I.: Optimizing group learning: an evolutionary computing approach. Artif. Intell. 275, 235–251 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Douven, I., Kelp, C.: Truth approximation, social epistemology, and opinion dynamics. Erkenntnis 75(2), 271–283 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Franks, N.R., Richardson, T.: Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature 439(7073), 153–153 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamann, H.: Superlinear scalability in parallel computing and multi-robot systems: shared resources, collaboration, and network topology. In: Berekovic, M., Buchty, R., Hamann, H., Koch, D., Pionteck, T. (eds.) ARCS 2018. LNCS, vol. 10793, pp. 31–42. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77610-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Heyes, C.M.: Social learning in animals: categories and mechanisms. Biol. Rev. 69(2), 207–231 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogg, E., Harvey, D., Hauert, S., Richards, A.: Evolving robust supervisors for robot swarms in uncertain complex environments. In: Matsuno, F., Azuma, S., Yamamoto, M. (eds.) DARS 2021. SPAR, vol. 22, pp. 120–133. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92790-5_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Innocente, M.S., Grasso, P.: Self-organising swarms of firefighting drones: Harnessing the power of collective intelligence in decentralised multi-robot systems. J. Comput. Sci. 34, 80–101 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwa, H.L., Leong Kit, J., Bouffanais, R.: Balancing collective exploration and exploitation in multi-agent and multi-robot systems: a review. Front. Robot. AI 8, 771520 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazer, D., Friedman, A.: The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Adm. Sci. Q. 52(4), 667–694 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker, C.A., Zhang, H.: Cooperative decision-making in decentralized multiple-robot systems: the best-of-n problem. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 14(2), 240–251 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubenstein, M., Ahler, C., Hoff, N., Cabrera, A., Nagpal, R.: Kilobot: a low cost robot with scalable operations designed for collective behaviors. Robot. Auton. Syst. 62(7), 966–975 (2014). Reconfigurable Modular Robotics

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schranz, M., Umlauft, M., Sende, M., Elmenreich, W.: Swarm robotic behaviors and current applications. Front. Robot. AI 7, 36 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Talamali, M.S., Saha, A., Marshall, J.A., Reina, A.: When less is more: robot swarms adapt better to changes with constrained communication. Sci. Robot. 6(56), eabf1416 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Valentini, G.: Achieving Consensus in Robot Swarms. SCI, vol. 706. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53609-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Valentini, G., Ferrante, E., Dorigo, M.: The best-of-n problem in robot swarms: formalization, state of the art, and novel perspectives. Front. Robot. AI 4, 9 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Vries, J.: Image processing and noise reduction techniques for thermographic images from large-scale industrial fires. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Quantitative InfraRed Thermography (QIRT) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Watts, D., Strogatz, S.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded and delivered in partnership between Thales Group, University of Bristol and with the support of the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, ref. EP/R004757/1 entitled “Thales-Bristol Partnership in Hybrid Autonomous Systems Engineering (T-B PHASE).”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Crosscombe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Crosscombe, M., Lawry, J. (2024). The Benefits of Interaction Constraints in Distributed Autonomous Systems. In: Bourgeois, J., et al. Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. DARS 2022. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51497-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics