Abstract
Industrial effluent is related to liquid waste generated by industries that may be emitted into the municipal drainage or sewer system. The effluents composition is extremely variable and heavily influenced by the various industries from which they originate. Contaminants can be grouped into different classes such as endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs), pharmaceuticals, pesticides, heavy metals and metalloids, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and microplastics. Each contaminant upon exposure possesses a specific health impact on humans and animals as well as on marine life when mixed in the sewer.
This harmful effluent needs to be treated to reduce its adverse effect either on-site or off-site. There are a variety of conventional and advanced wastewater treatment facilities available for use. For on-site installation of treatment facilities, the cost of such plants can be reduced by the government by taxing less on equipment purchases. For off-site installation of the treatment plant, the local body can seek financial support from the industries producing these effluents.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Effluent
- Wastewater
- Endocrine
- Heavy metals
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl
- Pharmaceuticals
- Pesticides
- Microplastics
1 Introduction
Industries, a key factor of economic growth, also have caused serious pollution and environmental issues (Wen 2009; Wei and Huang 2001). Industrial waste refers to unwanted residual materials generated by industrial processes or operations. Waste materials can be in solid, liquid, or gaseous form (Wen 2009; Misra and Pandey 2005; Ojoawo et al. 2011) that include among others food wastes, packaging materials, ashes, smoke, rubbish, debris, special wastes, and hazardous wastes (Aivalioti et al. 2014; Abduli 1996; Tchobanoglous et al. 1993; Casares et al. 2005; Vigneswaran et al. 1999). Special wastes including clinical and pharmaceutical wastes are considered nonhazardous waste but possess unique regulatory requirements.
Wastes can be categorized as hazardous and nonhazardous according to their effect on human or other organisms. Hazardous materials as listed in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations can be toxic, flammable, ignitable, reactive, or corrosive. Oil, printing ink, paint, varnish, soluble cutting emulsion, and disinfectants are some examples of hazardous wastes. Wastes that do fall under the category of hazardous wastes as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s definition are termed as nonhazardous waste. Laboratory waste consists of empty aerosol cans, nonsurgical and nonradioactive medical refuse, as well as food and packaging waste, which are a few examples of nonhazardous wastes.
In industrialized countries, public pressure regarding pollution led local bodies to act strictly, while in developing countries, awareness of pollution is lower in public, and the action of the local body is also not significant. Rapid industrialization and the use of toxic materials in processing have led to problems with environmental pollution (Wen 2009).
1.1 Solid Wastes
Annually, about 12 billion tons of industrial waste is being generated which will exceed upto 19 billion tons soon (Li 2009; Pappu et al. 2007; Yoshizawa et al. 2004). They can be of hazardous and nonhazardous nature (Li 2009). Unwanted materials produced during processing depend upon the types of industries. Mining industries produce waste stones, metallurgical industries produce slag, power industries produce ash, and chemical industries produce inferior products, unreacted materials, and disabled catalysts. Oil chemical industries produce oil mud and slag.
1.2 Liquid Wastes
Industrial liquid wastes include feedstock materials, by-products, product material in soluble or particulate form, washing and cleaning agents, solvents, etc. These wastes may be nontoxic inorganic substances or toxic organic substances. The effluents or wastewater including these materials pass through sewer network and affect the aquatic environment (Fig. 1).
1.3 Gaseous Wastes
Industrial emissions are in the form of particulate vapor, powder, mineral fumes, and smoke. Depending on the local regulations, they can be emitted into the atmosphere with or without prior treatment. The components in the emissions depend upon the types of fuel used and the nature of industries (Ojoawo et al. 2011). The environmental impacts of waste, such as pollution and disease, have turned into a source of major concern. When inadequately managed, wastes may lead to the deterioration of sewage systems with increasing environmental pollution and diseases (Hasheela 2009).
Sewage effluent-containing pathogens led to diseases such as diarrhea, polio, meningitis, and hepatitis. WHO (2003) estimated in 1998 that approximately 1.8 million children passed away in developing nations due to microorganisms, the vast majority of which originated from contaminated food and water. It is estimated that 12 million people die annually around the globe due to improper waste management (Davidson et al. 1992). Humans come into contact with wastes or are exposed to wastes by different routes such as ingestion, inhalation, and absorption. Drinking water and food containing hazardous substances from refuse residues constitute an ingestion route, the inhaling route is breathing airborne wastes, and the absorption route is by direct contact with waste residues (Hinga and Batchellor 2005).
Hazardous industrial wastes may have short- or long-term effects on humans and ecological systems. The potential health effects on human depend upon the characteristics of the hazardous chemicals, the duration of exposure, the health status of the exposed individual, as well as weather conditions (Misra and Pandey 2005; Grisham 1986). Health effects on human due to exposure to hazardous wastes may be carcinogenesis (i.e., causing cancers), genetic defects, reproductive abnormalities, alterations of immunobiological homeostasis, central nervous system (CNS disorder), and congenital anomalies (El Sidig NOA 2004). To prevent the adverse effect of hazardous materials or wastes on human and the environment, proper storage and treatment and disposal by the latest technology are required.
At present, waste management is one of the world’s greatest environmental challenges (Kan 2009). Industrial wastes can be toxic, ignitable, corrosive, and reactive substances that need to reduce the adverse effect before being discharged into the environment (Zurbrugg 2002). Waste management methods differ from developed countries to developing countries and also differ in urban to rural areas (Addo 2013). Waste is managed in accordance with public health, economics, engineering, conservation, esthetics, and other environmental considerations and public attitudes (Tchobanoglous et al. 1977; Demirbas 2011).
Solid waste management covers control of the generation, storage, collection, transfer and transport, processing, and disposal of solids. Liquid waste management deals with wastewater treatment and sewage treatment. A variety of waste streams is generated by industries, referred as industrial effluents, which are discharged to either the municipal or public effluent treatment system or directly to receiving waters. These effluents contain numerous substances that may pose health hazards to humans. Depending on the industries, to reduce contaminant concentrations effluents may be treated on-site, or are discharged to municipal effluent treatment system or directly to receiving waters. Countries possess policies regarding discharging effluents at tolerable levels and determining concentration limits for a variety of potentially hazardous contaminants. Additionally, sewage sludge, a potentially hazardous substance that settles out of domestic and industrial wastewater during remediation, also poses a threat to public health (Eaton 2022).
Different countries have set their own standards for concentration limits for several potentially harmful contaminants present in the discharge effluent. Also, the land is polluted by the addition of unstabilized sewage sludge from the treatment plant. The finding of new contaminants, their harmful effects, and their discharge limits will keep on being researched. Using global data, this report attempts to determine contaminants that are of more concern to human health and the types of industries that are discharging them. Depending on international data, contaminants that are of most concerns for human health are reported here (Stewart et al. 2016). The considered contaminants fall into seven general categories.: endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs), heavy metals and metalloids, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and microplastics. The potential health concern associated with each contaminant is discussed. However, the precise health hazard they pose is currently unclear and uncertain.
2 Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds
These are substances that interfere with biosynthesis, metabolism, or action of hormones to disrupt normal hormone signaling. (Diamanti-Kandarakis et al. 2009). The above chemicals of various categories have associated with variety of health issues and are considered a public health concern (Zoeller et al. 2014). These compounds are found in food, consumer goods, and pharmaceuticals (such as birth control medication), which upon discarded by human through excretion or activity pass to the municipal wastewater.
2.1 Nonylphenol and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates
Nonylphenol is a synthetic alkylphenol used in the production of antioxidants and lubricating oil additives and nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants (Soares et al. 2008). Such surfactants are extensively used in cosmetics and coatings, detergents and cleaning products, degreasers, emulsifiers, and wetting and de-wetting agents (Environment Canada and Health Canada 2001; Soares et al. 2008). On account of their widespread use, considerable amounts of NPEs enter into both industrial and residential wastewater systems. Nonylphenol and its ethoxylates have high environmental persistence. The estimated half-life of NPEs in sediments is greater than 60 years (Shang et al. 1999), they bioaccumulate over aquatic creature (Gautam et al. 2015), and also been identified in human lactation (Sise and Uguz 2017).
2.1.1 Health Hazard
The studies of laboratory animals reflect that nonylphenol can have a negative impact on reproduction and the immune and nervous systems (Cressey 2018). Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA) (Nielsen et al. 2000) and European Commission (EC) (2002) have recommended nonylphenol and its ethoxylates exposure limits which is represented in Table 1.
2.1.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
NPEs is mostly used for processes such as wool scouring, bleaching, laundering, and dyeing in Textile industries (Ho and Watanabe 2017). The concentrations range of 0.23–26 μg/L of nonylphenol was found to be in textile industry effluent which was discharged to the municipal wastewater management system of Canada (Environment Canada and Health Canada 2001). NPEs are used in paper and pulp industry for wetting of pulp fibers, and in the leather industry (Groshart et al. 2001).
2.1.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
In the European Union (EU), the discharge limit under Directive 2008/105/EC in surface water is 2 μg/L for nonylphenols. Canadian Environmental Protection Act (1999) has classified both nonylphenol and its ethoxylates as harmful compounds under Schedule 1. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set the rule of Agency review for its use. In New Zealand, 50 mg/kg dry weight is the proposed concentration limit of nonylphenol and its ethoxylates (Water New Zealand 2017).
2.2 Bisphenol A
It is a synthetic chemical which is mainly used for the manufacture of epoxy resins, polycarbonate plastics (NIEHS 2021), as well as food storage vessels (Cressey 2018).
2.2.1 Health Hazard
New Zealand Environmental Protection Authority suspected Bisphenol A could harm fertility or a fetus (EPA 2021). United States Food and Drug Administration (EPA 2021) and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA 2015) diminished the tolerable daily intake (TDI) of BPA to 5 and 4 μg/kg body weight/day respectively. However, a recent study reflects effects on concentrations as minimum as 2.5 microgram per kilogram of body weight per day (Heindel et al. 2020).
2.2.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Municipal wastewater contains BPA that comes from food and beverage packaging. Industrial effluent from paper mills (Balabanic and Klemencic 2011; Fuerhacker 2003; Lee and Peart 2000; Lee et al. 2015), textile industries (Lee and Peart 2000; Pothitou and Voutsa 2008), tanning industries (Pothitou and Voutsa 2008), metal or wood industries, chemical industries, dry cleaning/cloth washing, plastics and polymer industries (Fuerhacker 2003; Lee and Peart 2000), and petrochemical industries (Mirzaee et al. 2019) contains subsequent amount of BPA.
2.2.3 Discharge Limits and Regulation
The set limit for BPA in industrial effluent is 1.75 μg/L in Canada (Government of Canada 2018), whereas in the United States, BPA action plan has been created by EPA (US EPA 2021a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h) without a discharge concentration limit.
2.3 Phthalates
Phthalates or phthalate plasticizers are used for solvent properties to make products more durable and flexible. They are used in various products such as vinyl flooring, plastic packaging, medical tubing, shampoos, hair sprays, soaps (CDC 2021), and cosmetics (U.S. Food and Drug 2021). Phthalates, which have a different types of derivatives, are diesters of 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid. Four derivatives included in discussion are BBP, DBP, DiBP, and DEHP.
2.3.1 Health Hazards
Phthalate syndrome is a common health effect that refers to the capacity to inhibit androgen biosynthesis, thereby disrupting sexual differentiation of male (CHAP 2014; National Research Council 2008). The health hazard posed by above listed phthalates is reproductive or developmental toxicity (antiandrogenic) concerns (Ashworth and Chappell 2015). Other report suspected that they damaged fertility or the unborn child (Cressey 2018). The TDI for phthalates is set as 0.05 mg/kg bw/day by EFSA by setting the index compound as DEHP and expressing potency of another phthalate’s relative to DEHP (EFSA 2022a, b) (Table 2).
2.3.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
In Slovenia, DBP, BB, and DEHP were found in the waste from paper and pulp industries (Balabanic and Klemencic 2011). In Argentina and India, BBP, DBP, DEHP, and DiBP were found in the effluent from tanneries (Bharagava et al. 2018; Zubair Alam et al. 2010; Labunska et al. 2011). France found the DBP, BBP, and DEHP in the waste generated from the textile industries, pharmaceutical industries, aerospace company, waste management, vehicle washing, cosmetics products, metallurgy, and transportation maintenance industries (Bergé et al. 2014). Effluents from a turkey processing plant also reported DiBP concentration (Buyukada 2019).
2.3.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
There are regulations regarding phthalate levels in kids toys, cosmetics kids care products etc., information about its level in sewage is not sufficient (Government of Canada 2017). In United States, EPA set discharge limits for DEHP, BBP, and DBP summarized in Table 3 (US EPA ELGs 2022a, b, c).
2.4 Dioxins
Dioxin, or 2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), refers to chemicals polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Stockholm Convention concluded these three classes of dioxin as persistent organic pollutants (POPs). It means signatories must act either to reduce or minimize or eliminate its release where possible. Chlorine-containing industrial processes produces dioxin as unwanted by-products from pulp and paper industries, herbicide/pesticide production, and smelting.
2.4.1 Health Hazards
There is sufficient evidence that dioxin causes among others chloracne, non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin disease, hypertension, etc. (Ministry of Health 2020). Table 4 represents the recommended dioxins and dioxin-like compounds exposure limits set by different agencies, such as US EPA, Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), EFSA, and New Zealand Ministry of Health.
2.4.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Effluent and sludge from pulp and paper mills contain dioxins as they perform chlorine bleaching (Whittemore et al. 1990). Dioxin is also found in the effluents from other manufacturing industries such as caprolactam (an intermediate of nylon),vinyl chloride, acetylene, alumina fibers, chlorobenzene, 4-chloro sodium hydrogen phthalate, 2,3-dichloro-1,4-naphthoquinone, and organic colored pigments (Kawamoto and Weber 2021). Dioxins were found in the effluents of chemical industries that manufacture petroleum, plastics, synthetic polymers, nonvolatile elastics, industrial organic chemicals, cyclic organic crudes, dyes and pigments, pesticides, and agricultural chemicals (Sappington et al. 2015).
2.4.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
In Japan, the PCDD/PCDFs discharge limit is set to 10 picogram toxic equivalentper litrefor industrial effluent (Kawamoto and Weber 2021). Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (Government of Canada 2021) prohibited pulp and paper industry from releasing 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF into the environment. For 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF by the pulp, paper and paperboard industries EPA has set discharge limit of maximum 10 pg/L per day (US EPA ELGs 2022a, b, c). Trade Waste Standard (Standards New Zealand 2004) set a maximum concentration of 0.002 g/m3 (2 μg/L) for PCBs.
3 Heavy Metals and Metalloids
Heavy metals are high density (i.e., minimum five times denser in comparison with water) metallic elements (Tchounwou et al. 2012). Industrial effluents may contain chromium, nickel, lead, copper, metalloid arsenic, zinc, and cadmium (Wang 2018) and in sewage sludge as bio-solids.
3.1 Cadmium
It is a harmful and undesirable heavy metal present in phosphate rock, ingredient of superphosphate fertilizer. Cadmium enters the agricultural land through the use of fertilizer and industrial effluents containing cadmium to wastewater.
3.1.1 Health Hazards
Despite lowest levels, cadmium is toxic to body. It damages kidneys and gets accumulated with a half-life of approximately 15 years (Mannetje et al. 2018). Cadmium is used in various industries such as textile, electronics, electroplating, chemical, metal finishing, and metallurgical industries (Velusamy et al. 2021).
Table 5 represent the recommended exposure limits set by different agencies, such as Dutch National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), JECFA, US EPA, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).
3.1.2 Limit of Discharge and Policies
The summary of discharge limits set by EPA (US EPA ELGs 2021) is represented in Table 6.
3.2 Chromium
Chromium (Cr) is found in oxidation states such as most stable chromium VI and chromium III (Wilbur et al. 2012). An essential nutrient chromium III is found naturally, whereas highly toxic chromium VI seldom occurs naturally which readily occur reduction reaction to chromium III (US EPA 1984). Anthropogenic activities produced chromium VI which when enters water form relatively stable (US EPA 1984; Wilbur et al. 2012).
3.2.1 Health Hazards
The exposure of chromium VI may affect on the respiratory system and kidneys and also causes cancer (Mannetje et al. 2018). Different organizations have set recommended exposure limits which are mentioned in Table 7.
3.2.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Chromium is present in the effluent of industries such as textiles, metal finishing and electroplating, tanneries, dyes and pigment, wood preservation, and fertilizer industries. (Dermentzis et al. 2011, Verma et al. 2013). Very high level of chromium in the effluent is reported from the electroplating industry (reportedly up to 2500 mg/L of the highly toxic chromium VI) (Dermentzis et al. 2011), substantial chromium concentrations in textile dying wastewaters (Çetin et al. 2008), and leather tanneries (0.2 to more than 14 mg/L) in Argentina (Labunska et al. 2011).
3.2.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
In the European Union, discharge limits of total chromium vary among member states, with a maximum discharge limit of 5 mg/L for total chromium and 1 mg/L for chromium VI in water (Vaiopoulou and Gikas 2020).
In the US, discharge limit is set for total chromium on daily maximum concentration for electroplating 7 mg/L, leather tanning and finishing (12–19) mg/L, and timber 4 mg/L (US EPA ELGs 2021). The discharge limits for total chromium are summarized in Table 8.
3.3 Lead
Lead (Pb) in environment can be found in trace amounts. In early days, industries used it extensively in products such as ceramics, cosmetics, petrol, paints, batteries, and plumbing materials (EPA 2021). Its uses have been phased out because of its toxicity.(Pickston et al. 1985).
3.3.1 Health Hazards
Lead (Pb) exposure is associated with a several adverse health hazard, which include increased blood pressure, decrease in renal function and fertility, and neurocognitive effects. Neurodevelopmental effects in children even at low level (Mannetje et al. 2018). The exposure limit reported by RIVM is 3.6 μg/kg bw/day, oral (Baars et al. 2001).
3.3.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Lead in the effluent from the iron, steel, pulp and paper industries (US Environmental Protection Agency 2018), paint industries (Malakootian et al. 2009), a brewery, and a textile industry (Muhammd et al. 2018) are found.
3.3.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
The discharge limits set by US EPA ELGs are summarized in Table 9.
3.4 Mercury
Mercury (Hg) is a highly toxic, its uses are in products such as personal care products, thermometers, fluorescent light bulbs, electrical switches, pigments, batteries, and dental amalgams. Its usage is being phased out due to its adverse effects on human health (Crossett 2011; Suess et al. 2020).
3.4.1 Health Hazards
The health hazards caused by exposure of mercury depend upon its form (elemental, organic, or inorganic). Mercury can be accumulated in the human body and is also harmful to many biological systems, including the kidneys, the brain, and the epidermis. The elemental and organic forms of mercury can cross the blood–brain and placental barriers, accumulate in the brain, and develop a fetus (Ministry of Health 2021a, b). Mercury affects the kidneys, brain, skin and can accumulate in the brain, neurological effects, and developing fetus (ATSDR 1999; JECFA 2007). Table 10 represents different government agencies recommended exposure limits for mercury.
3.4.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Mercury in effluent is found from dental practice wastes (Bender 2008), papers, electrical utilities, and also from metal sectors (such as mining, primary, and fabricated metals).
3.4.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
Many countries have recognized mercury as a hazardous substance which led Minamata Convention to diminish mercury emissions in the world (Suess et al. 2020). Under the ELGs, the US EPA has set mercury discharge limits for various point source categories (EPA 2021) summarized in Table 11. The daily maximum concentration of mercury in point source inorganic chemicals manufacturing is highest 110 μg/L to lowest in generating steam electric power (0.0018–0.788) μg/L, other contributors being centralized waste management, ore mining and dressing, etc.
3.5 Arsenic
Arsenic (As), a metalloid, was used in pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and agriculture-based industries (IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 2012). Due to its toxic nature, many industries stopped its uses, though metal industry uses it as an alloying agent, leather industry uses during tanning of hides, and other uses is in manufacturing of paper, paint pigments, metal adhesives, glass, ammunition, and wood preservatives.
3.5.1 Health Hazards
Inorganic arsenic is highly toxic as compared to organic arsenic. Arsenic is known to be carcinogenic, lead to skin, bladder, and lung cancer. Moderate levels but long-term exposure damage heart, kidneys, liver, nerves and blood vessels (Ministry of Health 2021a, b). Table 12 represents the different government agencies recommended exposure limits for arsenic.
3.5.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Arsenic is usually found as an impurity from metal ores and consequently enters the mining industry. Other potential sources of arsenic include the paper industry, the generation of steam-powered electricity, the refining of wood products, and waste treatment, among others.
3.5.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
The US EPA has set limits for arsenic present in discharges as daily maximum concentration from different point source (US EPA ELGs 2021), as described in Table 13.
4 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances
Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances are a broad family of synthetic chemicals with resistance to water, oil, grease, and fire. These properties led to its widespread use in the production of numerous products, such as fabrics and carpets that are stain- and water-resistant, coatings, aviation hydraulic fluids, cleaning products, insect lures, firefighting foams, and in the electroplating and electronic industries all contain polyurethane. Due to their resistance to degradation, these substances persist in the environment for extended periods of time and bioaccumulate in tissues. Among the 3000 PFAS, perfluoro octane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are the most well known (Wang et al. 2017). Several PFAS being phased out because of environmental concerns, Stockholm Convention also enlisted PFOS and PFOA.
These substances gets mixed with wastewater network from both industrial and residential sources which are most substantial (Rumsby 2018). The estimated half-lives of PFOS and PFOA in the human body are 3.4 and 2.7 years, respectively (Li et al. 2018), though PFOS and PFOA are not considered to pose acute health risks. Industrial sources for these compounds among others are the textile, metal plating industry, pulp and paper industry, semiconductor, and electronics business (Lin et al. 2009; Tonkin and Taylor Ltd 2018; Kim et al. 2021).
4.1 Health Hazards
The effects of PFOS and PFOA exposure are not considered to pose an acute health risk (Ministry for the Environment 2021). The chronic exposure limit is on serum cholesterol levels and immune effects, in spite of that the estimated half-lives of PFOS and PFOA in the human body are 3.4 and 2.7 years, respectively (Li et al. 2018), Table 14 represents the different government agencies recommended arsenic exposure limits.
4.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Textile industry is one of the major industries utilizing PFAS (Ministry of Environment and Food, The Danish Environmental Protection Agency 2015), in flame-retardant clothing and to impart water, oil, and dirt resistance into fabrics and carpets (Tonkin and Taylor Ltd 2018).
PFAS is commonly used in the metal plating industry (HRP Associates 2021), chromium electroplating facilities, pulp and paper industry, and semiconductor and electronics industries (Tonkin and Taylor Ltd 2018) resulted in contamination to wastewater (US EPA 2021a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h).
4.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
The US EPA developed effluent guidelines based on data acquired from a “preliminary multi-industry PFAS study” and mandated PFAS manufacturers to adhere to these standards (US EPA 2021a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h).The New Zealand EPA set PFOS and PFOA in waste discharge limits at 0.1 μg/L and 1 μg/L for total PFAS (Dawson 2018). The EPA also proposed limit for PFOS in biosolids to be at 0.3 mg per kg dry weight (Table 15).
5 Pharmaceuticals
It is not possible to individually assess the hazards posed by each industrial effluent due to the wide variety of pharmaceutical drugs available worldwide. Wastewater treatment plants in industries are noted to be poorly equipped (Orias and Perrodin 2013), and this becomes the major source of pharmaceuticals to the aquatic species (Larsson et al. 2007; Sengar and Vijayanandan 2022; ANSES 2013; Khetan and Collins 2007; WHO 2012). Also from human excretion, it entered municipal wastewater and groundwater.
5.1 Health Hazards
Several researches have determined the environmental and ecological effects of pharmaceuticals in aquatic environments (Khetan and Collins (2007), Orias and Perrodin (2013), and Orias and Perrodin (2014)), its impact on human is less known (Khetan and Collins 2007). It has been determined that very little amounts of pharmaceuticals in drinking water are extremely unlikely to pose health hazards to humans (WHO 2012), antibiotics contribution to the growth of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) may constitute a threat to human health (Kumar et al. 2019; Larsson et al. 2007; Sengar and Vijayanandan 2022).
5.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Pharmaceuticals entered municipal WWTPs through residential and trade waste route. Consumed or improperly discarded medications that are flushed down the commode or sink constitute residential contributions (WHO 2012), whereas industrial contributions consist of effluents containing pharmaceuticals from hospital waste, pharmaceutical company, and old care facilities (Orias and Perrodin 2014). Compared to residential wastewater, hospital effluents contain significantly higher concentrations of pharmaceuticals (Verlicchi et al. 2012; Majumder et al. 2021).
5.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
There are guidelines relating to hospital wastewater management (WHO 2014; US EPA ELGs for Hospitals) without specific standards for pharmaceutical pollutants (Majumder et al. 2021). The US EPA has also set ELGs for the pharmaceutical manufacturers (US EPA ELGs 2022a, b, c) without mentioning discharge limits for specific pharmaceutical products. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2019 published a report categorizing source-directed, use-oriented, and end-of-pipe policy instruments.
All these three categories are further subdivided into regulatory, economic, and voluntary. Regulations include environmental quality, good manufacturing practices, effluent discharge, best available techniques, and product bans. Economic include product or substance charges and subsidies. Lastly, voluntary includes advisory services, waste collection, public environmental health campaigns, disease prevention, and eco-labeling of green pharmaceuticals. It is directed to decrease or diminish the discharge of pharmaceuticals into water resources (OECD 2019) to protect drinking water sources.
6 Pesticides
As like pharmaceuticals, pesticides also exist in wide variety in numbers. It is not possible to assess individually the risk posed by each chemical in industrial effluents. They entered to wastewater through industrial effluent and from agricultural land and thus effect the aquatic environment.
6.1 Health Hazards
Among the three primary categories of pesticides, only insecticides interfere with the nervous system, whereas fungicides and herbicides have a much wider range of potential health effects. The World Health Organization categorizes pesticides in accordance with their acute oral and dermal toxicity to rats (WHO 2020). These categories are extremely (Ia) and highly hazardous (Ib); moderately hazardous (II); slightly hazardous (III); and unlikely to present acute hazard (U) in normal use (WHO 2020), as summarized in Table 16.
6.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Significant quantities of pesticides have been detected in the wastewaters from multiple pesticide manufacturing facilities around the world (Affam et al. 2014, Pham et al. 2021). In addition, pesticides have been detected in effluent discharged from the agro-based industry, including fruits and vegetables (Campos-Mañas et al. 2019), and fruit-packaging industry (Karas et al. 2016).
6.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
The US EPA has determined ELGs of a daily maximum of 0.01 kg of organic pesticide chemicals per 1000 kg of total organic active ingredients and a monthly average of 0.0018 kg of organic pesticide chemicals per 1000 kg of total organic active ingredients (US EPA ELGs 2022a, b, c). In Italy, the discharge limit of total pesticides is 50 μg/L (Mezzanotte et al. 2005), in New Zealand, the Model General Bylaw for Trade Waste (Standards New Zealand 2004) sets a maximum concentration of 0.2 g/m3 (200 μg/L) for total pesticides discharge limit, and in Taiwan, discharge limits depend on types pesticides (Hamilton et al. 2003).
7 Microplastics
Microplastics refer to plastic smaller than 5 mm in length, it comprises various polymers and different chemical additives (Rochman et al. 2019). They emerge from the breakdown of larger plastic pollutant that comes from residential and industrial sources.
7.1 Health Hazards
Microplastics serve as vectors for toxic contaminants; they can be transported through circulatory system to distant sites in the body (Rahman et al. 2021). In addition, microplastics have also been detected in human placentas (Ragusa et al. 2021). Microplastics infiltrate the wastewater network in large quantities from several household sources, including significant amounts of microfibers released when washing synthetic clothing (Prata 2018).
7.2 Sources of Industrial Effluent
Large amounts of microplastics pass through wastewater network from several household sources, including washing of synthetic clothes in the form of microfibers (Prata 2018). Though treatment processes reduce microplastic concentration to low level, a high volume of effluents released daily add substantial amount to wastewater (Conley et al. 2019, Prata 2018, Sun et al. 2019, Conley et al. 2019). Wastewater-containing antibiotics get contact with microplastics and together they may develop extracellular antibiotic resistance genes and antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Syranidou and Kalogerakis 2021). Industrially, polymer processing plant (Bitter and Lackner 2020), textile manufacturing industry (Chan et al. 2021, Xu et al. 2018, Zhou et al. 2020), marine construction facilities (Franco et al. 2020), machine manufacturing, and chemical and electroplating plants in China (Wang et al. 2020) contribute microplastic to wastewaters.
7.3 Limit of Discharge and Policies
The European Commission is creating a microplastics initiative to decrease the accidental discharge of microplastics into the environment (European Commission 2021). Water Research Australia studied that effluents that contain microplastic are not currently regulated under discharge licenses (Water Research Australia 2021). In New Zealand, Aotearoa Impacts and Mitigation of Microplastics (AIM2) Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Endeavour (MBIE) also investigates microplastics in wastewater (ESR 2021).
8 Conclusions
The objective of this study was to understand contaminants originating from industrial as well as municipal waste. This chapter tries to provide an international perspective on contaminants that are more concerned with human health determined in industrial effluents based on the literature. The selected contaminants were grouped into six classes, such as endocrine-disrupting compounds, heavy metals and metalloids, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and microplastics. The industries generating these effluents were identified and potential health effects to human were also highlighted. Biodiversity and ecosystem services are also affected by these pollutants. Within the context of the mitigation hierarchy, environmental impacts should first be avoided, then minimized, and finally restored where possible. To reduce the adverse effect, treatment facilities, both onsite and off-site, need to installed. Factors causing the unrepaired environmental damage pay compensation, while the society does not bear the cost. The methods of environmental compensation and minimization of negative impacts on the environment are measures to protect environmental elements. This environmental compensation may relate to protecting plants, animals, or protection against pollution of air, water, and soil. The local body should also ensure that industries compensate the farmer for the loss of vegetation caused by the effluent.
Abbreviations
- AMR:
-
Antimicrobial resistance
- BBP:
-
Benzyl butyl phthalate
- BPA:
-
Bisphenol A
- DBP:
-
Di-n-butyl phthalate
- DEHP:
-
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
- DiBP:
-
Di-iso butylphthalate
- DVFA:
-
Danish Veterinary and Food Administration
- EC:
-
European commission
- EDCs:
-
Endocrine-disrupting compounds
- EFSA:
-
European Food Safety Authority
- EPA:
-
Environmental Protection Agency
- kg bw:
-
Kilograms of body weight
- LOAEL:
-
Lowest observed adverse effect level
- MRL:
-
Minimum risk level
- PCBs:
-
Polychlorinated biphenyls
- PCDDs:
-
Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
- PCDFs:
-
Polychlorinated dibenzofurans
- PFAS:
-
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
- PFOA:
-
Perfluorooctanoic acid
- PFOS:
-
Perfluorooctane sulfonate
- POPs:
-
Persistent organic pollutants
- PTMI:
-
Provisional tolerable monthly intake
- RfD:
-
Reference dose
- TCDD:
-
2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
- TDI:
-
Tolerable daily intake
- TMI:
-
Tolerable monthly intake
- TWI:
-
Tolerable weekly intake
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
- μg/kg:
-
Microgram per kilogram
References
Abduli MA (1996) Industrial waste management in Tehran. Environ Int 22:335–341
Addo K (2013) Solid waste management in Ghana: a case study of Effiduase and Asokore in the Sekyere East District, Master thesis, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
Affam AC, Chaudhuri M, Kutty SRM et al (2014) UV Fenton and sequencing batch reactor treatment of chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin and chlorothalonil pesticide wastewater. Int Biodeter Biodegr 93:195–201
Aivalioti M, Cossu R, Gidarakos E (2014) New opportunities in industrial waste management. Waste Manag 34(10):1737–1738
ANSES (2013) Health risk assessment associated with the presence of pharmaceuticals in drinking water: general method and application to carbamazepine and danofloxacin: expert report. French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France
Ashworth M, Chappell A (2015) Health risk assessment of selected phthalates reported from a local survey of children's plastic toys in Christchurch, New Zealand. Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Christchurch
ATSDR (1999) Toxicological profile for mercury. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA
ATSDR (2021) Minimal risk levels (MRLs) for hazardous substances. Available at https://wwwn.cdc.gov/TSP/MRLS/mrlslisting.aspx
Baars AJ et al (2001) Re-evaluation of human-toxicological maximum permissible risk levels. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu RIVM. RIVM Rapport 711701025
Balabanic D, Klemencic AK (2011) Presence of phthalates, bisphenol A, and nonylphenol in paper mill wastewaters in Slovenia and efficiency of aerobic and combined aerobic-anaerobic biological wastewater treatment plants for their removal. Fresen Environ Bull 20:86–92
Bender M et al (2008) Facing up to the hazards of mercury tooth fillings. In: A report to US House of Representatives Government Oversight Committee on Domestic Policy assessing state and local regulations to reduce dental mercury emissions. https://www.non-au-mercure-dentaire.org/_fichiers/submission_mercury_policy_project.pdf. Mercury 2008
Bergé A, Gasperi J, Rocher V, Gras L, Coursimault A, Moilleron R (2014) Phthalates and alkylphenols in industrial and domestic effluents: case of Paris conurbation (France). Sci Total Environ 488–489:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.081
Bharagava RN, Saxena G, Mulla SI, Patel DK (2018) Characterization and Identification of Recalcitrant Organic Pollutants (ROPs) in Tannery Wastewater and Its Phytotoxicity Evaluation for Environmental Safety. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 75(2):259–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-017-0490-x
Bitter H, Lackner S (2020) First quantification of semi-crystalline microplastics in industrial wastewaters. Chemosphere 258:127388
Buyukada M (2019) Removal potential reaction pathways and overall cost analysis of various pollution parameters and toxic odor compounds from the effluents of turkey processing plant using TiO2–assisted UV/O3 process. J Environ Manag 248:109298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109298
Campos-Mañas MC, Plaza-Bolaños P, Martínez-Piernas AB et al (2019) Determination of pesticide levels in wastewater from an agro-food industry: target, suspect and transformation product analysis. Chemosphere 232:152–163
Casares ML, Ulierte N, Matarán A, Ramos A, Zamorano M (2005) Solid industrial wastes and their management in Asegra (Granada, Spain). Waste Manag 25:1075–1082
CDC (2021) Phthalates factsheet. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/biomonitoring/Phthalates_FactSheet.html
Çetin D, Dönmez S, Dönmez G (2008) The treatment of textile wastewater including chromium(VI) and reactive dye by sulfate-reducing bacterial enrichment. J Environ Manag 88(1):76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.019
Chan CKM, Park C, Chan KM et al (2021) Microplastic fibre releases from industrial wastewater effluent: a textile wet-processing mill in China. Environ Chem 18:93–100
CHAP (2014) Chronic hazard advisory panel on phthalates and phthalate alternatives. US Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
Conley K, Clum A, Deepe J et al (2019) Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year. Water Res X 3:100030
Cressey P (2018) Risks to public health from emerging organic contaminants in the New Zealand aquatic environment. Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Christchurch
Crossett A (2011) Mercury pollutant minimization plan: Gerorgia-Pacific LLC
Davidson J, Meyers D, Chakraborty M (1992) No time to waste: poverty and the global environment. Oxfam, Oxford
Dawson P (2018) Disposal of PFAS containing wastewater to trade waste: environmental protection authority
Demirbas A (2011) Waste management, waste resource facilities and waste conversion processes, energy convers. Manage 52:1280–1287
Dermentzis K, Christoforidis A, Valsamidou E et al (2011) Removal of hexavalent chromium from electroplating wastewater by electrocoagulation with iron electrodes. Global NEST J 13:412–418
Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Bourguignon JP, Giudice LC et al (2009) Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an endocrine society scientific statement. Endocr Rev 30:293–342
Eaton C (2022) Review of potential health hazards associated with industrial effluents e Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR). Ministry of Health
EFSA (2007) ONE Conference 2022. EFSA
EFSA (2014a) CONTAM. Available at https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3595
EFSA (2014b) Scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of chromium in food and drinking water. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy. EFSA J 12:3595
EFSA (2015) Annual Report of the European Food Safety Authority for 2015. Europa
EFSA (2018) Dioxins and related PCBs: tolerable intake level updated. Available at https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/dioxins-and-related-pcbs-tolerable-intake-level-updated
EFSA (2021) EFSA sets lower tolerable intake level for cadmium in food. Available at https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/news/efsa-sets-lower-tolerable-intake-level-cadmium-food
EFSA (2022a) Available at https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5838
EFSA (2022b) PFAS in food: EFSA assesses risks and sets tolerable intake. Available at https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/news/pfas-food-efsa-assesses-risks-and-sets-tolerable-intake
El Sidig NOA (2004) Solıd waste management in Khartoum industrial area, Master thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan
Environment Canada and Health Canada (2001) Nonylphenol and its ethoxylates. Ottawa
EPA (2021) Arsenic, inorganic. Available at https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=278
ESR (2021) Aotearoa impacts and mitigation of microplastics (AIM2). Available at https://www.esr.cri.nz/our-research/research-projects/aotearoa-impacts-and-mitigation-of-microplastics-aim/
European Commission (2002) European Union risk-assessment report vol 10, 2002 on 4-nonylphenol (branched) and nonylphenol. European Chemicals Bureau, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
European Commission (2021) Microplastics. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/environment/topics/plastics/microplastics_en
Food Standards Australia New Zealand (2011) The 23rd Australian total diet survey. Food Standards Australia New Zealand, Canberra
Food Standards Australia New Zealand (2022) Perfluorinated compounds. Available at https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/chemicals/Pages/Perfluorinated-compounds.aspx
Franco AA, Arellano JM, Albendín G et al (2020) Mapping microplastics in Cadiz (Spain): occurrence of microplastics in municipal and industrial wastewaters. J Water Process Eng 38:101596
Fuerhacker M (2003) Bisphenol A emission factors from industrial sources and elimination rates in a sewage treatment plant. Water Sci Technol 47:117–122
Gautam GJ, Chaube R, Joy K (2015) Toxicity and tissue accumulation of 4-nonylphenol in the catfish heteropneustesfossilis with a note on prevalence of 4-NP in water samples. Endocrine Disruptors 3:e981442
Government of Canada (2017) Risk management scope for 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester [DEHP]. Available at https://www.ec.gc.ca/ese-ees/default.asp?lang=En&n=E00E9A1F-1
Government of Canada (2018) Bisphenol A. Available at https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/evaluating-existing-substances/federal-environmental-quality-guidelines-bisphenol-a.html
Government of Canada (2021) Pulp and paper mill effluent chlorinated dioxins and furans regulations. Available at https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-92-267/FullText.html
Grisham JW (1986) Health aspects of the disposal of waste chemicals. Pergman Press, Oxford
Groshart CP et al (2001) Chemical study on alkylphenols. Rijkswaterstaat, RIKZ
Hamilton DJ, Ambrus Á, Dieterle RM et al (2003) Regulatory limits for pesticide residues in water - (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 75:1123–1155
Hasheela R (2009) Municipal waste management in Namibia: the Windhoek case study, PhD thesis, Universidad Azteca, Mexico
Heindel JJ, Belcher S, Flaws JA, Prins GS, Ho SM, Mao J, Patisaul HB, Ricke W, Rosenfeld CS, Soto AM, vom Saal FS, Zoeller RT (2020) Data integration, analysis, and interpretation of eight academic CLARITY-BPA studies. Reprod Toxicol 98:29–60
Hinga KR, Batchellor A (2005) Waste processing and detoxification in Hassan RM, Scholes R, and Ash N eds., Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends Volume 1, Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 917
Ho H, Watanabe T (2017) Distribution and removal of nonylphenol ethoxylates and nonylphenol from textile wastewater—A comparison of a cotton and a synthetic fiber factory in Vietnam. Water 9(6):386. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060386
HRP Associates (2021) PFAS in the metal plating industry fact sheet. Available at https://hrpassociates.com/uploads/files/Metal_Plating_Fact_Sheet.pdf?v=1623863694814#:~:text=PFAS%20have%20been%20used%20in,emissions%20of%20toxic%20metal%20fumes
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2012) Arsenic and arsenic compounds in arsenic, metals, fibres and dusts. Volume 100 C. A review of human carcinogens. Lyon, France
JECFA (2007) Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Prepared by the sixty-seventh meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). World Health Organization, Geneva
JECFA (2011) Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food. In: Presented at Seventy-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. JECFA, Rome, Italy
Kan A (2009) General characteristics of waste management: a review. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part A Energy Sci Res 23(1):55–69
Karas PA, Perruchon C, Karanasios E et al (2016) Integrated biodepuration of pesticide-contaminated wastewaters from the fruit-packaging industry using biobeds: bioaugmentation, risk assessment and optimized management. J Hazard Mater 320:635–644
Kawamoto K, Weber R (2021) Dioxin sources to the aquatic environment: re-assessing dioxins in industrial processes and possible emissions to the aquatic. Emerg Contam 7:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2021.01.002
Khetan SK, Collins TJ (2007) Human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment: a challenge to green chemistry. Chem Rev 107:2319–2364
Kim KY, Ndabambi M, Choi S, Oh JE (2021) Legacy and novel perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in industrial wastewater and the receiving river water: temporal changes in relative abundances of regulated compounds and alternatives. Water Res 191:116830
Kumar R, Sarmah AK, Padhye LP (2019) Fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in a wastewater treatment plant with parallel secondary wastewater treatment train. J Environ Manage 233:649–659
Labunska I, Brigden K, Santillo D, Johnston P (2011) Heavy metal and organic chemical contaminants in wastewater discharged from leather tanneries in the Lanús district of Buenos Aires. greenpeace. https://www.greenpeace.to/greenpeace/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/Argentina-tanneries-Technical-Note-07-2011-final.pdf
Larsson DGJ, de Pedro C, Paxeus N (2007) Effluent from drug manufactures contains extremely high levels of pharmaceuticals. J Hazard Mater 148:751–755
Lee HB, Peart TE (2000) Bisphenol A contamination in Canadian municipal and industrial wastewater and sludge samples. Water Qual Res J 35:283–298
Lee S, Liao C, Song GJ, Ra K, Kannan K, Moon HB (2015) Emission of bisphenol analogues including bisphenol A and bisphenol F from wastewater treatment plants in Korea. Chemosphere 119:1000–1006
Li J (2009) Types, amounts and effects of industrial solid wastes point sources of pollution: local effects and its control, vol I. EOLSS Publisher, Oxford
Li Y, Fletcher T, Mucs D, Scott K, Lindh CH, Tallving P, Jakobsson K (2018) Half-lives of PFOS, PFHxS and PFOA after end of exposure to contaminated drinking water. Occup Environ Med 75:46–51
Lin AYC, Panchangam SC, Lo CC (2009) The impact of semiconductor, electronics and optoelectronic industries on downstream perfluorinated chemical contamination in Taiwanese rivers. Environ Pollut 157:1365–1372
Majumder A, Gupta AK, Ghosal PS, Varma M (2021) A review on hospital wastewater treatment: a special emphasis on occurrence and removal of pharmaceutically active compounds resistant microorganisms and SARS-CoV-2. J Environ Chem Eng 9(2):104812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104812
Malakootian M et al (2009) Removal of heavy metals from paint industry’s wastewater using Leca as an available adsorbent. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6:183–190
Mannetje A, Coakley J, Douwes J (2018) Report on the biological monitoring of selected chemicals of concern: results of the New Zealand biological monitoring programme, 2014–2016. Massey University, Wellington
Mezzanotte V, Canziani R, Sardi E et al (2005) Removal of pesticides by a combined ozonation/ attached biomass process sequence. Ozone-Sci Eng 27:327–331
Ministry for the Environment (2021) PFOS and PFOA contamination: Engagement with potentially affected neighbours. Available at https://environment.govt.nz/site-search/?keyword=pfos%20%20and%20pfoa
Ministry of Environment and Food, The Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2015) Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in textiles for children. Survey of chemical substances in consumer products. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen
Ministry of Health (2020) Dioxins: a technical guide. Ministry of Health, Wellington
Ministry of Health (2021a) The environmental case management of mercury-exposed persons. Ministry of Health, Wellington
Ministry of Health (2021b) Arsenic and health. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/your-health/healthy-living/environmental-health/hazardous-substances/arsenic-and-health#healtheffects
Mirzaee SA, Jaafarzadeh N, Gomes HT, Jorfi S, Ahmadi M (2019) Magnetic titanium/carbon nanotube nanocomposite catalyst for oxidative degradation of bisphenol A from high saline polycarbonate plant effluent using catalytic wet peroxide oxidation. Chem Eng J 370:372–386
Misra V, Pandey SD (2005) Hazardous waste, impact on health and environment for development of better waste management strategies in future in India. Environ Int 31:417–431
Muhammd BL et al (2018) Determination of cadmium, chromium and lead from industrial wastewater in Kombolcha town, Ethiopia using FAAS. Anal Chem
National Research Council (2008) Phthalates and cumulative risk assessment: the tasks ahead. Washington
NIEHS (2021) Bisphenol A (BPA). Available at https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/sya-bpa/index.cfm
Nielsen E, Østergaard G, Thorup I, Ladefoged O, Jelnes JE (2000) Toxicological evaluation and limit values for nonylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylates, tricresyl, phosphates and benzoic acid. Danish Veterinary and Food Administration
OECD (2019) Pharmaceutical residues in freshwater: hazards and policy responses. OECD Publishing, Paris. Available at https://www.oecd.org/environment/resources/Pharmaceuticals-residues-in-freshwater-policy-highlights-preliminary-version.pdf
Ojoawo S, Agbede O, Sangodoyin A (2011) On the physical composition of solid wastes in selected dumpsites of Ogbomosoland, South-Western Nigeria. J Water Resource Prot 3:661–666
Orias F, Perrodin Y (2013) Characterisation of the ecotoxicity of hospital effluents: a review. Sci Total Environ 454–455:250–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.064
Orias F, Perrodin Y (2014) Pharmaceuticals in hospital wastewater: their ecotoxicity and contribution to the environmental hazard of the effluent. Chemosphere 115:31–39
Pappu A, Saxena M, Asolekar SR (2007) Solid wastes generation in India and their recycling potential in building materials. Build Environ 42:2311–2320
Pham TL, Boujelbane F, Bui HN et al (2021) Pesticide production wastewater treatment by electro-Fenton using Taguchi experimental design. Water Sci Technol 84:3155–3171
Pickston L, Brewerton HV, Drysdale JM et al (1985) The New Zealand diet: a survey of elements, pesticides, colours, and preservatives. NZ J Tech 1:81–89
Pothitou P, Voutsa D (2008) Endocrine disrupting compounds in municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants in northern Greece. Chemosphere 73:1716–1723
Prata JC (2018) Microplastics in wastewater: state of the knowledge on sources, fate and solutions. Mar Pollut Bull 129:262–265
Ragusa A, Svelato A, Santacroce C et al (2021) Plasticenta: first evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ Int 146:106274
Rahman A, Sarkar A, Yadav OP, Achari G, Slobodnik J (2021) Potential human health risks due to environmental exposure to nano- and microplastics and knowledge gaps: a scoping review. Sci Total Environ 757:143872
Rochman CM, Brookson C, Bikker J et al (2019) Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suite. Environ Toxicol Chem 38:703–711
Rumsby A (2018) Poly and perfluorinated alkyl substances and wastewater treatment plants. Pattle Delamore Partners, Auckland
Sappington EN, Balasubramani A, Rifai HS (2015) Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) in municipal and industrial effluents. Chemosphere 133:82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.019
Sengar A, Vijayanandan A (2022) Human health and ecological risk assessment of 98 pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) detected in Indian surface and wastewaters. Sci Total Environ 807:150677
Shang DY, Macdonald RW, Ikonomou MG (1999) Persistence of nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants and their primary degradation products in sediments from near a municipal outfall in the strait of Georgia, British Columbia, Canada. Environ Sci Technol 33:1366–1372
Sise S, Uguz C (2017) Nonylphenol in human breast milk in relation to sociodemographic variables, diet, obstetrics histories and lifestyle habits in a Turkish population. Iran J Public Health 46:491–499
Soares A, Guieysse B, Jefferson B, Cartmell E, Lester JN (2008) Nonylphenol in the environment: a critical review on occurrence, fate, toxicity and treatment in wastewaters. Environ Int 34:1033–1049
Standards New Zealand (2004) Model general bylaw. Part 23—Trade waste (Standard No. 9201)
Stewart M, Northcott G, Gaw S, Tremblay LA (2016) An update on emerging organic contaminants of concern for New Zealand with guidance on monitoring approaches for councils: prepared by Streamlined Environmental Ltd, Northcott Research Consultants Ltd, University of Canterbury, Cawthron Institute and the University of Auckland for Auckland Council, Greater Wellington Regional Council and Environment Canterbury Regional Council
Suess E, Berg M, Bouchet S et al (2020) Mercury loads and fluxes from wastewater: a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Water Res 175:115708
Sun J, Dai X, Wang Q et al (2019) Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: detection, occurrence and removal. Water Res 152:21–37
Syranidou E, Kalogerakis N (2021) Interactions of microplastics, antibiotics and antibiotic resistant genes within WWTPs. Sci Total Environ 804:150141
Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Eliassen R (1977) Solid wastes: engineering principles and management issues. McGraw Hill, Inc., New York
Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil SA (1993) Integrated solid waste management: engineering principle and management issue. McGraw Hill Inc., New York
Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ (2012) Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Experientia Suppl 101:133–164
Tonkin and Taylor Ltd (2018) Scoping study: non fire-fighting foam sources of PFAS contamination in New Zealand: Report prepared for Environment Canterbury
U.S. Food and Drug (2021) Phthalates in cosmetics. Available at https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetic-ingredients/phthalates-cosmetics#pht
US Environmental Protection Agency (2018) Final 2016 effluent guidelines program plan. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
US EPA (1984) Health assessment document for chromium. Environmental Assessment and Criteria Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park
US EPA (1987a) Dibutyl phthalate (DBP). Available at https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=38
US EPA (1987b) Di (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP). Available at https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=14
US EPA (1989) Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP). Available at https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=293
US EPA (2021a) Risk management for bisphenol A (BPA). Available at https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-bisphenol-bpa
US EPA (2021b) 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Available at https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=1024
US EPA (2021c) Chromium (III), insoluble salts. Available at https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=28
US EPA (2021d) Chromium (VI). Available at https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=144
US EPA (2021e) Bisphenol A. Available at https://www.epa.govt.nz/database-search/chemical-classification-and-information-database-ccid/view/B41EC9A7-D80E-41DF-A353-4AF0DCA80AC4
US EPA (2021f) Lead. Available at https://www.epa.gov/lead/learn-about-lead
US EPA (2021g) Methylmercury (MeHg). Available at https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=73
US EPA (2021h) Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) Proposed PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation. Available at https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas/
US EPA ELGs (2021). Available at https://owapps.epa.gov/elg/
US EPA ELGs (2022a). Available at https://owapps.epa.gov/elg/results
US EPA ELGs (2022b) Guidance manual for pulp paper and paperboard and builders' paper and board mills pretreatment standards. Available at https://owapps.epa.gov/elg/
US EPA ELGs (2022c). Available at https://environment.govt.nz/what-government-is-doing/international-action/minamata-convention-on-mercury/
Vaiopoulou E, Gikas P (2020) Regulations for chromium emissions to the aquatic environment in Europe and elsewhere. Chemosphere 254:126876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126876
Velusamy S, Roy A, Sundaram S, Mallick TK (2021) A review on heavy metal ions and containing dyes removal through graphene oxide-based adsorption strategies for textile wastewater treatment. Chem Rec 21:1570–1610
Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Galletti A et al (2012) Hospital effluent: investigation of the concentrations and distribution of pharmaceuticals and environmental risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 430:109–118
Verma SK, Khandegar V, Saroha AK (2013) Removal of chromium from electroplating industry effluent using electrocoagulation. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 17:146–152
Vigneswaran S, Jegatheesan V, Visvanathan C (1999) Industrial waste minimization initiatives in Thailand: concepts, examples and pilot scale trials. J Clean Prod 7:43–47
Wang JF (2018) Reuse of heavy metal from industrial effluent water. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 199:042002
Wang Z, DeWitt JD, Higgins CP, Cousins IT (2017) A never-ending story of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)? Environ Sci Technol 51:2508–2518
Wang F et al (2020) Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in domestic industrial agricultural and aquacultural wastewater sources: a case study in Changzhou China. Water Res 182:115956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115956
Water New Zealand (2017) Guidelines for beneficial use of organic materials on land. Water New Zealand, Wellington
Water Research Australia (2021) Occurrence, removal and risks of microplastics in drinking water and recycled water—State of knowledge. Available at https://www.waterra.com.au/research/open-rffs-and-rfps/2020/microplastics-in-wastewater-effluent/
Wei M-S, Huang K-H (2001) Recycling and reuse of industrial wastes in Taiwan. J Waste Manag 21:93–97
Wen X (2009) Point sources of pollution: local effects and their eontrol, vol I. EOLSS Publications, Oxford
Whittemore RC, LaFleur LE, Gillespie WJ, Amendola GA, Helms J (1990) USEPA/paper industry cooperative dioxin study: the 104 mill study. Chemosphere 20(10–12):1625–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(90)90322-K
WHO (2003) General information related to microbiological risks in food. Available at http://www.who.int/foodsafety/micro/general/en
WHO (2012) Pharmaceuticals in drinking water. World Health Organization, Geneva
WHO (2014) World health statistics 2014. WHO
WHO (2019) Exposure to dioxins and dioxin-like substances: a major public health concern. Available at https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/food-safety/dioxins.pdf?sfvrsn=4bcd5f4d_1
WHO (2020) The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, 2019 edn., World Health Organization, Geneva
WHO (2021a) Cadmium. Available at https://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database/chemical.aspx?chemID=1376
WHO (2021b) Mercury. Available at https://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database/chemical.aspx?chemID=1806
WHO (2022) Methylmercury. Available at https://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database/chemical.aspx?chemID=3083
WHO IPCS (2013). Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/90560
Wilbur S, Abadin H, Fay M et al (2012) Toxicological profile for chromium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Altlanta
Xu X, Hou QT, Xue YG et al (2018) Pollution characteristics and fate of microfibers in the wastewater from textile dyeing wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci Technol 78:2046–2054
Yoshizawa S, Tanaka M, Shekdar AV (2004) Global trends in waste generation. In: Gaballah I, Mishar B, Solozabal R, Tanaka M (eds) Recycling, waste treatment and clean technology, TMS mineral. Metals and Materials Publishers, Spain, pp 1541–1552
Zhou HJ, Zhou L, Ma KK (2020) Microfiber from textile dyeing and printing wastewater of a typical industrial park in China: occurrence, removal and release. Sci Total Environ 739:140329
Zoeller RT, Bergman A, Becher G, Bjerregaard P, Bornman R, Brandt I, Iguchi T, Jobling S, Kidd KA, Kortenkamp A, Skakkebaek NE, Toppari J, Vandenberg LN (2014) A path forward in the debate over health impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Environ Health 13:118
Zubair Alam M, Ahmad S, Malik A, Ahmad M (2010) Mutagenicity and genotoxicity of tannery effluents used for irrigation at Kanpur India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73(7):1620–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.07.009
Zurbrugg C (2002) Solid waste management in developing countries. SANDEC/EAWAG
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ansari, Z.H., Bista, U. (2023). Hazards Associated with Industrial Effluents and Its Mitigation Strategies. In: Pathak, P., Srivastava, R.R., Ilyas, S. (eds) Anthropogenic Environmental Hazards. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41013-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41013-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41012-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41013-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)