Skip to main content

Can We Forgo Our Attachments to Socially Constructed Identities?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Paradox(es) of Diasporic Identity, Race and Belonging

Part of the book series: Politics of Citizenship and Migration ((POCM))

  • 184 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines needs-based identity theory from the discipline of Peace and Conflict Studies (PACS). I describe how this theory is used to analyse conflicts and bring to the forefront of the discussion the limitations that stem from the Western and/or colonial lens from which the theory was conceived. From this perspective, identity is used as a tool to exacerbate divisiveness and arguably instigate conflict. Therefore, peace strategies that stem from this theory are susceptible to failure. Drawing on my experiences in my own quest to feel a sense of belonging in Canada, I share how I have learned to disengage from the external narratives that erode my sense of belonging and instead focus on an internal dialogue that cultivates harmony and oneness. Even though my story holds colonial experiences like many others, it remains a personal one which I hope offers motivation, inspiration, and perhaps guidance for those who hear their inner being calling for peace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The neoliberal peacebuilding paradigm is formulated to encapsulate Western ideals of statism—constitutionalism, market freedoms, democracy, human rights and rule of law (Chandler, 2017; Richmond, 2010).

  2. 2.

    A move Gayatri Spivak refers to as “strategic essentialism” (Paul, 2015: 173).

References

  • Azar, E. (1990). The management of protracted social conflict: Theory and cases. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, H., Morgan, P., Scott, C., & Cohen, A. (2016). Prolegomena to a spiritual research paradigm: Importance of attending to the embodied and the subtle. In J. Lin, R. L. Oxford, & T. Culham (Eds.), Toward a spiritual research paradigm: Exploring new ways of knowing, researching and being. Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M. (2005). Identity politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, T. E. (2011). Human agonistes: Interdisciplinary inquiry into ontological agency and human conflict. In D. J. D. Sandole, S. Byrne, I. Sandole-Staroste, & J. Senehi (Eds.), Handbook of conflict analysis and resolution (pp. 131–143). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunila, K., & Rossi, L.-M. (2018). Identity politics, the ethos of vulnerability, and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1343115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, S., & Carter, N. (2002). Social cubism: Six social forces of ethnopolitical conflict in Northern Ireland and Quebec. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 8(3), 741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, S., Matyók, T., Scott, I. M., & Senehi, J. (2020). Peace and conflict studies in the 21st century: Theory, substance, and practice. In S. Byrne, T. Matyók, I. M. Scott, & J. Senehi (Eds.), Routledge companion to peace and conflict studies (pp. 3–21). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, S., & Senehi, J. (2012). Violence: Analysis, intervention and prevention. Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, K. A. (2000). Understanding protracted social conflicts: A basic needs approach. In S. Byrne & C. Irvin (Eds.), Reconcilable differences: Turning points in ethnopolitical conflict (pp. 65–78). Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2017). Peacebuilding: The twenty year’s crisis, 1997–2017. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chilisa, B. (2012). Participatory research methods. In Indigenous research methodologies (pp. 267–292). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilisa, B., & Ntseane, G. (2010). Resisting dominant discourses: Implications of indigenous, African feminist theory and methods for gender and education research. Gender and Education, 22(6), 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2010.519578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, D. (2005). Peace is the way: Bringing war and violence to an end. Harmony Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Definition and the five stages of perception. (n.d.). https://www.ukessays.com/essays/psychology/definition-and-the-five-stages-of-perception-psychology-essay.php#citethis

  • Dege, M. (2014). Identity politics. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 936–941). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_586

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiAngelo, R. (2011). White fragility. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanh, T. N. t. (2017). The art of living: Peace and freedom in the here and now. Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • His Holiness the Dalai Lama. (2006). How to see yourself as you really are (J. Hopkins, Ed. & Trans.). Atria Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • His Holiness the Dalai Lama. (2008). In R. Mehrotra (Ed.), In my own words: An introduction to my teachings and philosophy. Hay House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H. W. (2020). Conflict transformation. In S. Byrne, T. Matyók, I. M. Scott, & J. Senehi (Eds.), Routledge companion to peace and conflict studies (pp. 25–34). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, M. (2021). Indigenous methodologies : Characteristics, conversations, and contexts (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A., Ogunfemi, N., Neville, H. A., & Tettegah, S. (2021). Resistance and restoration: Healing research methodologies for the global majority. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 29, 6. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., Oxford, R. L., & Culham, T. (2016). Introduction: The urgent need to develop a spiritual research paradigm. In J. Lin, R. L. Oxford, & T. Culham (Eds.), Toward a spiritual research paradigm: Exploring new ways of knowing, researching and being. Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2001). Beyond settler and native as political identities: Overcoming the political legacy of colonialism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 43(4), 651–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marley, B. (1980). Redemption song. On Uprising. Island Records.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, P. (2011). How preferences prejudice your perceptions. Retrieved February 9, 2019, from http://dharmawisdom.org/teachings/articles/how-preferences-prejudice-your-perceptions

  • Paul, K. (2015). Moving beyond intersectionality in development studies. St. Antony’s international review, 10(2), 168–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorn, B. D. (2000). The social origins of environmental resource conflict: Exposing the roots of tangible disputes. In S. Byrne & C. Irvin (Eds.), Reconcilable differences: Turning points in ethnopolitical conflict (pp. 79–95). Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2010). A genealogy of peace and conflict theory. In O. P. Richmond (Ed.), Palgrave advances in peacebuilding (pp. 14–38). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230282681_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, M., & Hernandez, L. (2011). The mastery of love: A practical guide to the art of relationship. Amber-Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? Organization (London, England), 18(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410372151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, S. (2007). Ethnic conflict: A global perspective. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, D., Mitra, S., & Zhang, H. (2016). When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0617

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabena Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

This chapter is dedicated to my grandmothers—Elizabeth and Somaria, and my daughters—Talisa and Maya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Singh, S. (2023). Can We Forgo Our Attachments to Socially Constructed Identities?. In: Maiangwa, B. (eds) The Paradox(es) of Diasporic Identity, Race and Belonging. Politics of Citizenship and Migration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38797-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics