Abstract
Ilmenites come from coastal sediments between the mouths of the Vamsadhara and Nagavali rivers, north coastal Andhra Pradesh, was studied using ilmenite end-member components. Ilmenite mineral chemistry has been studied from various environments to understand provenance by electron microprobe analyzer (EPMA). This study reveals that the ilmenite with the end-member components of Fe-Ti oxides is mainly ilmenite and has minor proportions of hematite, geikielite, and pyrophanite. The end-member compositions of Fe-Ti oxides and manganese/magnesium ratio indicate all the ilmenites of beach, dune, and estuarine environments are from the pyroxene granulites, khondalites, basic charnockites, and migmatites. Ilmenites are ferrian types and Ti/ (Ti + Fe) ratio is <0.5 indicating these are recently contributed to placer deposits. Ilmenites are mainly concentrated in fine fraction (+230) 51.50%. Ilmenite contains average TiO2 content is 52% with a low concentration of trace elements.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Ilmenite (FeTiO3) is a titanium-rich ore mineral. It has a solid solution with pyrophanite (MgTiO3), geikielite (MnTiO3), and hematite (Fe2O3). Generally, under microscope, ilmenite exhibits a significant amount of intergrowths with other Ti-Fe oxides due to exsolutions, hydrothermal, or oxidation processes. There are also trace amounts of Si, Al, Ca, Cr, Cu, and Zn in ilmenites. The mineral chemical characteristics of ilmenite are very useful to understand the provenance of ilmenite-bearing coastal sediments and also helpful in the selection of adaption methods of beneficiation for better recovery and extraction process.
Ilmenite geochemistry is most important for the selection of processing methodology either the chlorite route or sulfite route to produce titanium dioxide (TiO2). The mineral end-member compositions of ilmenite are essential for ore dressing and mineral beneficiation processes. Ilmenite‘s economic value can be determined by how altered or weathered it is. Ilmenite deposits in India have not received much attention in terms of mineral chemistry studies, and the coastal placer deposit at Nagavali-Vamsadhara (the subject of the current study) in particular. Rao and Sengupta (2014), Laxmi et al. (2014), Mohapatra et al. (2015), Acharya et al. (2015), and Ganapati Rao et al. (2019) are a few studies that looked at the ilmenite geochemistry of India‘s east coast.
2 Study Area and Regional Geology
The study area is a coastal stretch that extends to 33 km from the Nagavali to the Vamsadhara river mouths, Srikakulam district, North coastal Andhra Pradesh, India (Fig.12.1). The geographical coordinates of the study area are between 18°12.410′N and 18°21.995′N latitude, between 83°55.432′E and 84°08.730′E longitude. The examined coastal region is a portion of a sedimentary basin next to the Granulite Belt of the Eastern Ghats in the middle (EGGB). The three main types of rocks are as follows: (i) charnockite group of rocks; (ii) basic granulites formed from tholeiitic magma; and (iii) khondalite group of rocks (Ramam and Murthy 1997; Yugandhara Rao et al. 2001). The general trend of the rock formation is NW-SE following the major lineament trend (Fig. 12.2).
3 Methodology
3.1 Sample Collection and Preparation
In the research region, 38 sediment samples from coastal sediment were collected over 17 traverses parallel to the coast, with 2 km between traverses (Fig. 12.1). A polyvinyl chloride pipe with a 3-inch diameter and 30-cm length was used at each station to collect sediment samples, penetrating the sediment layers to a depth of 10 cm. By using the coning and quartering procedure, the sediment samples were decreased, and a representative amount was taken for sediment treatment to separate the heavy minerals. A total of 38 ilmenite grains were selected for mineral chemistry analysis after being differentiated from other grains in each sample using a binocular petrological microscope.
Every sample’s chosen ilmenite mineral grains were put on an epoxy resin slide of standard size for additional coating, polishing, and grinding to make sure the top and bottom of the resin blocks were parallel to one another. Using a fine silicon carbide abrasive, lapping is used to create a smooth surface (class 600). Samples were polished using very fine alumina slurry with a size range of 6–0.30 microns and fine silicon carbide (SiC) paper. To get rid of polishing grit and other surface impurities, polished samples are subsequently rinsed in clean water in an ultrasonic cleaner. After that, the sample was cleaned using a fan and allowed to air dry. To obtain good electron conductivity and interaction, the samples are coated with a coating of carbon.
An electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) was used to analyze the mineral grains of ilmenite (CAMECA SX-100). An electron beam with a 15 kV acceleration voltage and a 20 nA beam current stimulated the polished surfaces of 38 ilmenite granules. We maintained a ~1 μm beam radius. Most of the element calibrations were performed using natural mineral standards (almandine-Fe: rhodonite-Mn; TiO2-Ti; diopside-Mg, Ca; albite-Na, Al; chromite-Cr; hematite-Fe; wollastonite-Ca; corundum-Al; and orthoclase for Si and K).
4 Results
The detailed geochemical data of ilmenites from beach, dune, and estuarine environments were given in Tables 12.1, 12.2, and 12.3, respectively. The structure of ilmenites has been calculated based on two cations, three oxygens, and end members are also given in the respective tables. The ratios of manganese/magnesium and Ti/(Ti + Fe) of ilmenites were given in Table 12.4. The end-member compositions of beach sediments’ Fe-Ti oxides show that the proportions of ilmenite, pyrophanite, geikielite, and hematite range from 83.26% to 98.53%, 0.29% to 1.25%, 0.20% to 4.94%, and 0.25% to 11.41%, respectively (Table 12.1).
Ilmenite component in a dune environment ranges from 83.78% to 97.67%, pyrophanite from 0.22% to 4.21%, geikielite from 0.23% to 5.90%, and hematite from 0.59% to 9.91%, according to the end-member composition (Table 12.2). The end-member composition of estuarine environments shows that ilmenite varies from 91.17% to 96.89%, pyrophanite varies from 0.31% to 5.77%, geikielite varies from 1.55% to 7.02%, and hematite varies from 0.69% to 2.52%, with eskolaite being negligible in all environments (Table 12.3).
Ilmenites originating from several groups of rocks are distinguished using a rhombohedral quaternary system (Haggerty 1976; Nayak and Mohapatra 1998; Nayak et al. 2012) (Fig. 12.3). The five fields in this picture are as follows: (1) parametamorphites (Mn-rich); (2) intrusive (pegmatites and carbonatites); (3) basic suits (amphibolites and granite gneisses); (4) intrusive acid and anorthosite suites; and (5) kimberlites. All ilmenites fall in field 3 of the basic suite of rocks, which is the ilmenite field. The end-member compositions of Fe-Ti oxides from beach, dune, and estuarine environments were plotted in the rhombohedral quarternary (FeTiO3-MnTiO3-MgTiO3-Fe2O3) diagrams (Haggerty 1976; Nayak and Mohapatra 1998).
Ilmenites formed from beach sediment had an average TiO2 content of 52.48%, ranging from 51.31% to 53.85% for dune sediments, 47.07% to 58.62% for beach sediments, and 51.31% to 53.85% for estuarine sediments (Tables 12.1, 12.2, and 12.3). which is comparatively higher or lower than the hypothetical ilmenite (Deer et al. 1992) Higher titanium dioxide (TiO2) concentration could result from the other cations in ilmenite leaching, while lower titanium dioxide (TiO2) content could be the existence of exsolved phases of hematite (Jagannadha Rao et al. 2005). Detrital ilmenites from metamorphic sources have a narrow range of TiO2 content, with a mean of roughly 47% TiO2 (Basu and Molinaroli 1989).
FeO content varies from 32.97% to 48.58% (avg. 44.11%) in dune environments, from 44.21% to 49.41% (range 44.21–49.41%) in beach environments, and from 43.33% to 47.36% (range 43.33–47.36%) in estuarine environments (avg. 45.42%). The significant proportion of FeO in ilmenite may be due to exsolved stages of hematite. The MnO percentage of the ilmenite varies from 0.14% to 0.59% (avg. 0.31%) of sediments in beach environments, from 0.10% to 1.81% (avg. 0.48%) in dune environments, and from 0.15% to 2.72% in estuarine environments (avg. 0.54%). The MgO level varies from 0.05% to 1.32% (avg. 0.75%) in beach environments, from 0.06% to 1.56% (avg. 0.80%) in dune environments, and from 0.41% to 1.90% in estuarine environments (avg. 0.89%). In all conditions, ilmenite grains contain traces of SiO2 (0.04%) and Al2O3 (0.02%) (Tables 12.1, 12.2, and 12.3).
The elemental geochemistry of ilmenite is very useful for geochemical characterization and elemental ratios such as manganese/magnesium are widely used as a provenance indicator. The manganese/magnesium ratio of ilmenites from beach sediments ranges from 0.31 to 7.10 (avg.1.65). More than 75% of the ilmenite samples show Mn/Mg ratio is ≤1. In the ilmenites of dune sediments, manganese/magnesium ratio varies from 0.08 to 21.69 (avg. 3.64). More than 62% of ilmenite samples show manganese/magnesium ratio is ≤1 and in the ilmenite of estuarine sediments, manganese/magnesium ratio ranges from 0.12 to 4.45 (avg. 0.92) in the ilmenite of estuarine sediments (Table 12.4). More than 75% of ilmenites of estuarine environment also show a manganese/magnesium ratio of ≤1.
Several investigations on ilmenite of dunal sands Southwest coast of India and the Tamil Nadu coast indicate manganese/magnesium ratio is ≤1. The manganese/magnesium ratio of ilmenites from dune sands and source rocks of the southwest coast of India (Dinesh et al. 2007) is ≤1, and they suggested that the source rock for the ilmenites are mainly khondalite gneisses, and charnockites in the hinterland which was earlier reported by Aswathanaryana et al. (1964), Mallik et al. (1987), and Unnikrishnan (1988).
The manganese/magnesium ratio is ≤1, according to several studies on ilmenite of dunal sands on the Tamil Nadu and Southwest Indian coasts. Dinesh et al. (2007) suggested that the source rock for ilmenites is primarily khondalite gneisses and charnockites in the hinterland, which were previously reported by Aswathanaryana et al. (1964), Mallik et al. (1987), and Unnikrishnan (1988). Bhattacharyya et al. (1997) noticed that the high Manganese/Magnesium ratio > 9 for ilmenites from the Chhatrapur deposit corroborates the provenance of charnockites, migmatites, and granulites of Eastern Ghats as suggested earlier (Sengupta et al. 1990). The ratio of 2.56 for dune ilmenites of Visakhapatnam indicates various sources of basaltic and metasedimentary, rocks (Bhattacharyya et al. 1997). Ilmenites of Bhimunipatnam-Visakhapatnam coastal sands Manganese/Magnesium ratio ranges from 0.39 to 5.16 (Jagannadha Rao et al. 2005). The Manganese/Magnesium ratio of ilmenites from sapphirine granulite, charnockites, and khondalite of Eastern Ghat Group of rocks, Visakhapatnam is ≤1 (Kamineni and Rao 1988). Ilmenites of Chhatrapur (Acharya and Das 2001; Rao et al. 2005) and Ekakula dune sands (Acharya and Das 2001) of Orissa show a manganese/magnesium ratio of ≤1. The Tamil Nadu coastal ilmenites are mainly derived from metamorphic rocks. The manganese/magnesium ratios of ilmenites range from 1.69 to 3.59 in southeastern Bangladesh (Ahmed and Islam 2001) indicate that they are derived from plutonic rocks.
The present study area contains different suit of rock types such as khondalites, calc-silicate rocks, quartzites, charnockites, basic granulites, and granites of Archean to Precambrian age. These formations are highly migmatized and were termed as Eastern migmatized zone (Ramam and Murthy 1997). The manganese/magnesium ratios of the present work show that most of the ilmenites were derived from metamorphic rocks (pyroxene granulites and khondalites), the minor portion was derived from basic charnockites and migmatites.
Ilmenite‘s weathering mechanism has been proposed to be described by the ratio of Ti/(Ti + Fe). As the weathering mechanism progresses, the terms for the various stages are as follows: (a) Ti/(Ti + Fe) of ferrian ilmenite (0.50), (b) hydrated ilmenite (0.50–0.60), (c) pseudo rutile (0.60–0.70), and (d) leucoxene (>0.70) (Frost et al. 1983). In this work, ilmenite‘s chemical characterization and phases of modification were determined using the aforementioned classification.
The Ti/(Ti + Fe) ratio of the sediments from the beach environment ranges from 0.42 to 0.48 (avg. 0.46) (Table 12.4). These ilmenite grains have Ti/(Ti + Fe) ratio is <0.50 which indicates that they are ferrian ilmenite. In a dune environment, the Ti/(Ti + Fe) ratio of the sediments varies from 0.43 to 0.58 (avg.0.48) (Table 12.4) except for three samples all other ilmenite grains have Ti/(Ti + Fe) ratio is <0.50 which indicates that they are ferrian ilmenite. In an estuarine environment, the Ti/(Ti + Fe) ratio of the sediments average is 0.47and ranges from 0.46 to 0.49 (Table 12.4); these ilmenite grains have Ti/(Ti + Fe) ratio is <0.50 which indicates that they are ferrian ilmenite. The lower values of Ti/(Ti + Fe) and fresh grains of ilmenite indicate these grains have undergone less alteration.
Ilmenite’s degree of alteration is determined by the deposit’s geological history and weathering conditions (Hugo and Cornell 1991; Suresh Babu et al. 1994). Indian placer deposits have suffered varying degrees of change, with Kerala deposits showing the most alteration, Tamil Nadu deposits showing mild alteration, and Orissa deposits showing the least alteration (Suresh Babu et al. 1994). The present study area ilmenites have less alteration like ilmenites of Orissa placer deposits. The investigated area is under a subtropical environment. The high ferrous iron and less TiO2 ilmenite compared to the west coast Manavalakurichi and Chavara deposits. It suggests that the present placer deposits are younger in age and have undergone the least weathering.
5 Conclusions
-
1.
The end-member components of Fe-Ti oxides are mainly ilmenite and minor proportions of hematite, geikielite, and pyrophanite. The end-member compositions of Fe-Ti oxides and Manganese/Magnesium ratio indicate all the ilmenites of beach, dune, and estuarine environments are from the pyroxene granulites, khondalites, basic charnockites, and migmatites.
-
2.
Ilmenites are ferrian types and Ti/(Ti + Fe) ratio is <0.5 indicating these are recently contributed to placer deposits.
-
3.
Ilmenites are mainly concentrated in fine fraction (+230) 51.50%. Ilmenite contains average TiO2 content is 52% with a low concentration of trace elements.
References
Acharya BC, Das SK (2001) Beach placer deposits of Orissa. In: Rajamanickam GV (ed) Hand book of placer mineral deposits. New Academic Publishers, pp 130–137
Acharya BC, Nayak BK, Das SK (2015) Mineralogy and mineral chemistry of placer deposit around Jhatipodar, Odisha. J Geol Soc India 86:137–147
Ahmed SS, Islam MDB (2001) Economic minerals in the beach sands of south eastern Bangladesh. In: Rajamanickam GV (ed) Hand book of placer mineral deposits. New Academic Publishers, Delhi, pp 280–294
Aswathanaryana U, Subramaniam AP, Balakrishna S (1964) Origin of the heavy mineral sand deposits of the southwest coast of India. In: Advancing frontiers in geology and geophysics Indian Geophysical Union Hyderabad, pp. 481–489
Basu A, Molinaroli E (1989) Provenance characteristics of detrital opaque Fe-Ti oxide minerals. J Sediment Petrol 59(6):922–934
Bhattacharyya S, Sengupta R, Chakraborty M (1997) Elemental chemistry of ilmenite – an indicator of provenance. J Geol Soc India 50(6):129–140
Deer WA, Howie RA, Zussman J (1992) An introduction to rock forming minerals. Logman Group Ltd, Harlow, p 712
Dinesh AC, Nambiar AR, Unikrishnan E, Jayaprakash C, Venkateswara Rao C (2007) Mn and Mg and Mn/Mg ratio in detrital ilmenite – an indicator of provenance. J Appl Geochem 9(1):112–119
Frost MT, Grey IE, Harrowfield IR, Mason K (1983) The dependence of alumina and silica contents on the extent of alteration of weathered ilmenites from Western Australia. Mineral Mag 47:201–208
Ganapati Rao P, Reddy KSN, Ravi Sekhar C, Bangaku Naidu K, Murali Krishna KN, Reddy GVR (2019) Provenance studies of Ilmenite from Red Sediments, Bhimunipatnam Coast, East Coast of India. J Geol Soc India 93:101–108
Haggerty SE (1976) Opaque mineral oxides in terrestrial igneous rocks. In: Rumble D III (ed) Oxide minerals, vol 3. Mineralogical Society of America (Rev. Mineral.), pp 101–300
Hugo VE, Cornell DH (1991) Altered ilmenites in Holocene dunes from Zululand, South Africa, Petrographic Studies for multistage alteration. S Afr J Geol 94:365–378
Jagannadha Rao M, Ramana JV, Venugopal R, Rao MC (2005) Geochemistry and ore mineralogy of ilmenites from beach placers of the Visakhapatnam –Bhimunipatnam deposit, Andhra Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 66:147–149
Kamineni DC, Rao AT (1988) Sapphirine – granulites from the Kakanuru area, Eastern Ghats, India. Am Mineral 73:692–700
Laxmi T, Bhima Rao R, Mukherjee PS (2014) Recovery of badlands ilmenite for preparation of titanium rich slag using thermal plasma. Revista INNOVER 1(2):1–9
Mallik TK, Vasudevan V, Verghese A, Machado T (1987) The black sand placer deposits of Kerala beach, Southwest, India. Mar Geol 77:129–150
Mohapatra S, Behera P, Das SK (2015) Heavy mineral potentiality and alteration studies for ilmenite in Astaranga beach sands, district Puri, Odisha, India. J Geosci Environ Prot 3:31–37
Nayak BR, Mohapatra BK (1998) Two morphologies of pyrophanite in Mn-rich assemblages, Gangpur Group. India Mineral Mag 62(6):847–856
Nayak B, Mohanty S, Bhattacharyya P (2012) Heavy minerals and the characters of ilmenite in the beach placer sands of Chavakkad-Ponnani, Kerala coast, India. J Geol Soc India 79:259–266
Ramam PK, Murthy VN (1997) Geology of Andhra Pradesh. Geological Society of India Publication, pp 81–82
Rao DS, Sengupta D (2014) Electron microscopic studies of ilmenite from the Chhatrapur coast, Odisha, India, and their implications in processing. J Geochem:1–8
Rao DS, Vijaya Kumar TV, Subba Rao S, Prabhakar S, Bhaskar Raju G (2005) Alteration characteristics of the Manavalakurichi beach placer ilmenite, Tamilnadu. J Appl Geochem 7(2):195–200
Sengupta R, Bhattacharyya S, Rana RS, Mitra SK, Jain VK (1990) Preliminary studies of offshore heavy mineral placers, Gopalpur-Chhatrapur coast, Orissa. Indian J Geol 62(1):27–37
Suresh Babu DS, Thomas KA, Mohan Das PN, Damodaran AD (1994) Alteration of ilmenite in the Manavalakurichi deposit, India. Clays Clay Miner 42(5):567–571
Unnikrishnan VP (1988) Texture, mineralogy and provenance of the beach sands of south Kerala. Ph.D. Thesis (Unpublished). Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, p 120
Yugandhara Rao A, Ravi GS, Gajapathi Rao R, Krishnan S, Azam Ali M, Banerjee DC (2001) Srikurmam–a major heavy mineral beach and dune sand deposit of the east coast of India. In: Hand book of placer mineral deposits. New Academic Publishers, Delhi, pp 53–63
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to the Lord Jesus Christ for giving me the opportunity to write this post and for His bountiful grace and blessings. The corresponding author highly appreciates the financial support provided by the Basic Scientific Research (BSR), UGC, New Delhi Program. The HOD of the Geology Department at Andhra University is thanked by the corresponding author for expanding the lab facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ravi Sekhar, C. et al. (2023). Mineral Chemistry of Ilmenites as a Source Indicator for Coastal Sediments Between Vamsadhara and Nagavali River Mouth, North Coastal, Andhra Pradesh. In: Jayaraju, N., Sreenivasulu, G., Madakka, M., Manjulatha, M. (eds) Coasts, Estuaries and Lakes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21644-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21644-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21643-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21644-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)