Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Twinning of Bildung and Competence in Environmental and Sustainability Education: Nordic Perspectives

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Curriculum Theory, Research, and Practice

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 411 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the twinning of Bildung (political and democratic formation) and competence in the action competence (AC) concept, highlighting its assumptions regarding what constitute appropriate forms of learning, action, and change in justifications of curricular content and teaching and learning approaches and potentials and constraints in terms of guiding educational practice. It is drawing on conceptualizations of AC in key theoretical texts within environmental and sustainability education (ESE), as well as on the concept’s use in a set of Nordic guidelines for ESE practice. Its conceptualization as an educational ideal is well aligned with notions of active democratic citizenship in Nordic educational policies and curriculum frameworks and is referring to both a non-affirmative and a transformative approach to education. On the one hand, underlining that education is not about shaping children and young people in line with a preexisting or given society; on the other hand, emphasizing the potential of education to transform and change subjectivities. The use of the concept in the Nordic guidelines illustrates different understandings of AC, validating the introductory description of the concept as a vehicular educational idea that can be taken up in different ways in pursuit of various ends, its hermeneutic, and contextual flexibility allowing it to balance different interests within educational research, policy, and practice. Its use in the guidelines can furthermore be described as framed by an adaptive approach, referring to forms of learning, action, and change that do not challenge existing frameworks or rationales in schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Autio, T. (2006). Subjectivity, curriculum and society: Between and beyond the German Didaktik and Anglo-American curriculum studies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, T. (2015). Curriculum theory, education policy, and “the recurring question of the subject”. In J. M. Paraskeva & S. Steinberg (Eds.), Curriculum: Decolonizing the field (pp. 233–242). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2009). Analyzing policy, what’s the problem represented to be? Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, S. (2019). Engaging with the beyond – Diffracting conceptions of T-learning. Sustainability, 11(3430), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, K., & Scott, W. (1998). Deconstructing action competence: Developing a case for a more scientifically-attentive environmental education. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiting, B., Hedegaard, K., Mogensen, F., Nielsen, K., & Schnack, K. (1997). Action competence, conflicting interests and environmental education – The MUVIN Programme. Odense Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiting, S., Mayer, M., & Mogensen, F. (2005). Quality criteria for ESD schools. Guidelines to enhance the quality of Education for Sustainable Development. ENSI and SEED network. https://www.ensi.org/global/downloads/Publications/208/QC-GB.pdf

  • Carlsson, M. (2020). Action competence at work in education for sustainable development (Handlekompetencebegrebet på arbejde i uddannelse for bæredygtig udvikling). In J. Andreasen Lysgaard & N. Jordt Jørgensen (Eds.), The pedagogy of sustainability: Research perspectives and examples from practice (Bæredygtighedens pædagogik: Forskningsperspektiver og eksempler fra praksis) (pp. 123–139). Frydenlund Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, M. (2021). Transformative expectations in environmental and sustainability education research. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 22(Special issue), 230–264. https://tidsskrift.dk/index.php/outlines

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, M., & Hoffmann, B. (2011). Action competence and democratic formation. (Handlekompetence og demokratisk dannelse). In K. K. B. Dahl, J. Læssøe, & V. Simovska (Eds.), Essays on bildung, curriculum and action competence – Inspired by Karsten Schnack. (Essays om dannelse, didaktik og handlekompetence – Inspireret af Karsten Schnack) (pp. 119–130). Research program for Environmental and Health Pedagogy, The Danish School of Education, Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, M., & Jensen, B. B. (2006). Encouraging environmental citizenship: The roles and challenges for schools. In A. Dobson & D. Bell (Eds.), Environmental citizenship (pp. 237–262). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, M., & Lysgaard, J. A. (2020). Education for sustainable development: From policy to practice (Uddannelse for bæredygtig udvikling: Fra politik til praksis). In J. Andreasen Lysgaard & N. Jordt Jørgensen (Eds.), The pedagogy of sustainability: Research perspectives and examples from practice (Bæredygtighedens pædagogik: Forskningsperspektiver og eksempler fra praksis) (pp. 42–64). Frydenlund Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, M., & Simovska, V. (2012). Exploring learning outcomes of school-based health promotion – A multiple case study. Health Education Research, 27(3), 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, A. (2014). Analysing documents. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 367–380). SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eames, C., Law, B., Barker, M., Iles, H., McKenzie, J., Patterson, R., et al. (2006). Investigating teachers’ pedagogical approaches in environmental education that promote students’ action competence. TLRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinet, M., & Zachariou, A. (2014). Key stones on school community collaboration for sustainable development. CoDeS – Schools and Community – Working Together for Sustainable Development. CoDeS Comenius Network report. Available at: https://www.ensi.org/global/downloads/Publications/369/CoDeS-Key%20Stones.pdf

  • Franklin, B. M. (2015). The discursive roots of community: A genealogy of the curriculum. In J. M. Paraskeva & S. Steinberg (Eds.), Curriculum: Decolonizing the field (pp. 53–66). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellesnes, J. (1976). Socialization and technocracy (Socialisering og teknokrati). Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, S. (2015). ‘Didaktik meets Curriculum’ revisited: historical encounters, systematic experience, empirical limits. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27007

  • Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1994). Action competence as an educational challenge. In B. B. Jensen & K. Schnack (Eds.), Action and Action competence as key concepts in critical pedagogy. Studies in educational theory and curriculum (Vol. 12, pp. 5–18). Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jónsson, O. (Ed.). (2021). Mapping education for sustainable development in the Nordic countries. Icelandic Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. https://pub.norden.org/temanord2021-511/?fbclid=IwAR3pC946C1gYHc-m9NZcOep76qH-LnguKa3WoA2WDSLjIxZQiTRo4CShGoM#58073

    Google Scholar 

  • Jucker, R., & Mathar, R. (2014). Schooling for sustainable development in Europe: Concepts, policies and educational experience at the end of the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klafki, W. (1998). Characteristics of a critical constructive didaktik. In S. Hopmann & B. B. Gundem (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue (pp. 307–330). Peter Lange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klafki, W. (2001). Dannelsesteori og Didaktik: Nye studier [Theory of Bildung and Didaktik: New studies] (1st ed., pp. 59–103). Klim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, H. J. (1991). Pedagogy – Theory in practice. The school in the 90’s (Pædagogik – teori i praksis. Skolen i 90’erne). Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2017). Education and the common good. In B. Jickling & S. Sterling (Eds.), Post-sustainability and environmental education (pp. 63–78). Palgrave Mc Millan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lotz-Sisitka, H., Fien, J., & Ketlhoilwe, M. (2013). Traditions and new niches: An overview of environmental education curriculum and learning research. In R. B. Stevensen, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 194–205). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lotz-Sisitka, H., Wals, A., Kronlid, D., & McGarry, D. (2015). Transformative, transgressive social learning: Rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2015). Education in times of fast learning: The future of the school. Ethics and Education, 10(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2014.998027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, M., Bieler, A., & McNeil, R. (2015). Education policy mobility: Reimagining sustainability in neoliberal times. Environmental Education Research, 221(3), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, G. (2004). Travelling with vehicular ideas: The case of the third way. Economy and Society, 33(4), 484–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogensen, F., & Schnack, K. (2010). The action competence approach and the “new” discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Education. (undated). Guideline for education for sustainability. https://seniorsecondary.tki.org.nz/Social-sciences/Education-for-sustainability

  • Nordic Council of Ministers. (2019). A good life in a sustainable Nordic region: Nordic Strategy for Sustainable Development 2013–2025. Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/PN2019-705

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nordic Council of Ministers. (2020). The Nordic region – Towards being the most sustainable and integrated region in the world: Action plan for 2021 to 2024. Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/politiknord2020-728

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, O. K. (2014). The competitive state and its education policy: Background, intentions and modes of operation (Konkurrencestaten og dens uddannelsespolitik: Baggrund, intentioner og funktionsmåder). In K. Illeris (Ed.), Learning in the competitive state: Race or sustainability (Læring i konkurrencestaten: Kapløb eller bæredygtighed) (pp. 13–33). Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pristley, M., & Biesta, G. (2014). Introduction: The new curriculum. In M. Pristley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum. New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 1–12). Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prøitz, T. S. (2010). Learning outcomes – What are they? Who defines them? When and where are they defined? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(2), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prøitz, T. S. (2015). Learning outcomes as a key concept in policy documents throughout policy changes. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(3), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and well-functioning society. Hogrefe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryen, E. (2020). Klafki’s critical-constructive didaktik and the epistemology of critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1657959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sass, W., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Olsson, D., Gericke, N., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2020). Redefining action competence: The case of sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1765132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheie, E., & Korsager, M. (Eds.). (2017). Nordic workingmodel for education for sustainable development (Nordisk arbeidsmodell for Undervisning for bærekraftig utvikling). Naturfagssenteret rapport nr. 1, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnack, K. (2000). Action competence as a curriculum perspective. In B. B. Jensen, K. Schnack, & V. Simovska (Eds.), Critical environmental and health education – Research issues and challenges (pp. 107–127). Research Centre for Environmental and Health Education, Danish University of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, E. C. (2008). Curriculum policy research. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. I. Phillion (Eds.), (pp. 420–430). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables, A. (2013). The unsustainability imperative? Problems with “sustainability” and “sustainable development” as regulative ideals. Environmental Education Research, 19(2), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. B., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. E. J. (2013). International handbook of research on environmental education. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N., Quinn, F., & Eames, C. (2015). Educating for sustainability in primary schools. Teaching for the future. Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uljens, M., & Rajakaltio, H. (2017). National curriculum development as educational leadership: A discursive and non-affirmative approach. In M. Uljens & R. Ylimaki (Eds.), Bridging educational leadership, curriculum theory and didaktik: Non-affirmative theory of education (pp. 411–438). Springer Open.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. (2017). Non-affirmative theory of education as a foundation for curriculum studies, didaktik and educational leadership. In M. Uljens & R. Ylimaki (Eds.), Bridging educational leadership, curriculum theory and didaktik: Non-affirmative theory of education (pp. 3–36). Springer Open.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2014). The Global Action Programme (GAP) on Education for sustainable development. https://en.unesco.org/globalactionprogrammeoneducation

  • UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232555

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals. UNESCO. https://bangkok.unesco.org/content/education-sustainable-development-goals-learning-objectives

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2020). Visioning and framing the futures of education. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/outcome_document_first_meeting_of_international_commission_on_the_futures_of_education.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Vare, P. (2018). A rounder sense of purpose: Developing and assessing competences for educators of sustainable development. Form@re, 18(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.13128/formare-23712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilaça, T., Darlington, E., Velasco, M. J. M., Martinis, O., & Masson, J. (2019). SHE SCHOOL MANUAL 2.0. www.schoolsforhealth.org/resources/materials-and-tools/

  • Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as reflective practice: What might Didaktik teach curriculum? In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15–39). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willbergh, I. (2015). The problems of “competence” and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective of Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.1002112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Danish School of Education, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Monica Carlsson

Authors
  1. Monica Carlsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Carlsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ontario Inst for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Peter Pericles Trifonas

  2. School of Early Childhood Studies, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Susan Jagger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Carlsson, M. (2024). The Twinning of Bildung and Competence in Environmental and Sustainability Education: Nordic Perspectives. In: Trifonas, P.P., Jagger, S. (eds) Handbook of Curriculum Theory, Research, and Practice. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21155-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation