Abstract
Protecting and promoting the rights of vulnerable groups is an internationally recognised standard for good governance and inclusive development. This is underscored by the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) as essential to strengthening democracy and political governance in Africa. This chapter reviews the progress made by the Republic of South Africa since 2019 on the rights of vulnerable groups. It argues that practices and affirmative actions towards combatting prejudice or eliminating conditions that perpetuate discrimination against vulnerable and marginalised groups at both national and sub-national levels in South Africa have produced mixed results. These include challenges of designing and implementing policies and programmes of social inclusion that address the vulnerabilities of immigrant populations—asylum seekers, refugees, undocumented migrants and gender non-conforming people. Similarly, public and service delivery systems have not prioritised protective measures to secure their lives, properties and livelihoods against violence. Therefore, cooperative governance, socio-economic inclusion and support for vulnerable groups should be incorporated into the national development priorities of South Africa. Starting with the review of national intervention programmes, an overhaul of public participation mechanisms and processes to enhance efficiency in service delivery is critical to sustainably address these challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adedeji, A., Badewa, A., & Olafeso, O. (2019). Social war or cultural slur? Xenophobic violence and post-apartheid governance in South Africa. Nigerian Forum (The Nigerian Institute of International Affairs), 40(12), 614–627.
African Peer Review Mechanism. (2017). Annual report. Retrieved from www.nepad.org/aprm
APRM South Africa. (2008). APRM country review and the National Programme of action of the Republic of South Africa.
APRM South Africa. (2013). Third report on the implementation of South Africa’s APRM Programme of action - broadening public participation.
APRM South Africa. (2016). APRM close-out and review report South Africa. Johannesburg.
Arukwe, C. N. (2019). Implications of a potential ratification of the international convention on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and their families by South Africa. University of Pretoria.
AU. (2018). Migration policy framework for Africa and plan of action (2018–2030). African Union Commission. Retrieved from https://au.int/en/documents/20181206/migration-policy-framework-africa-mpfa
Charles, M. (2021). Home Affairs signs deal with UN refugee agency to deal with asylum seekers backlog, News24.com. Retrieved March 28, 2021, from https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/home-affairs-signs-deal-with-un-refugee-agency-to-deal-with-asylum-seekers-backlog-20210322
Health and Democracy. (2019). The rights of vulnerable groups to health Care in South Africa.
Ibrahim, M. (2005). The securitization of migration: A racial discourse. International Migration, 43(5), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2005.00345.x
International Organisation for Migration. (2018). World migration report 2018. International organisation for Migration. https://doi.org/10.18356/f45862f3-en
IOM Southern Africa. (2009). Migrants’ right to health in southern Africa. International Organisation for Migration. Retrieved from https://publications.iom.int/books/migrants-right-health-southern-africa
Merten, M. (2021, 26 August). Home affairs, where permanent residency applications go to gather dust in Covid-19 state of disaster. Daily Maverick, 1–6. Retrieved from https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-08-26-home-affairs-where-permanent-residency-applications-go-to-gather-dust-in-covid-19-state-of-disaster/
Porter, A. (2018). The rights of vulnerable and marginalised groups in South Africa (pp. 11–15). Centre for Conflict Resolution. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep05159.5
Studies in Poverty and Inequality Institute (SPII). (2016). International covenant on economic social and cultural rights (ICESCR) gap analysis report and performance monitoring framework’, (November) (pp. 1–92).
Van Der Burg, A. (2006). Legal protection of undocumented foreign migrant children in South Africa: Reality or myth? Law, Democracy & Development, 10(2), 82–100.
Warn, E., & Abi, S. (2020). Reorganising borders in the age of free movement in Africa. In A. Adepoju, C. Fumagalli, & N. Nyabola (Eds.), Africa migration report: Challenging the narrative (pp. 76–88). Addis Ababa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Badewa, A.S., Dinbabo, M.F. (2023). South Africa’s Political Commitment to the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Vulnerable Groups. In: Ile, I., Fagbadebo, O. (eds) Democracy and Political Governance in South Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16313-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16313-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16312-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16313-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)