Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare malignant tumor in childhood not only in Europe but also in Asia, where the highest incidence of NPC in adult patients is seen. NPC represents one of the most frequent epithelial tumors of the child in intermediate-risk regions. However, distinguishing malignant tumors from the more common and numerous benign causes of neck masses in childhood is crucial, as many malignant conditions have an excellent prognosis with appropriate oncological management, but with long-term effects that require long-term surveillance.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- Epstein–Barr virus
- Neck mass
- Intracranial extension
- Adolescent-young adult
- Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma
1 Introduction
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare malignant tumor in childhood not only in Europe but also in Asia, where the highest incidence of NPC in adult patients is seen. NPC represents one of the most frequent epithelial tumors of the child in intermediate-risk regions. However, distinguishing malignant tumors from the more common and numerous benign causes of neck masses in childhood is crucial, as many malignant conditions have an excellent prognosis with appropriate oncological management. The worldwide incidence of NPC in children and adolescents between 0 and 14 years is 0.1 per 100,000 and follows a bimodal age distribution with a first peak between 10 and 20 years and a second peak between the fourth and sixth decades (Bray et al. 2008; Wei and St Sham 2005). Males are more frequently affected than females, with a male to female ratio of 2:1. In the United States, the incidence is higher in African-American children than in children of other races, but this racial predilection is lost in older ages. While 10–15% of cases occur in patients younger than 30 years of age, it makes up only 1% of childhood malignancies. In pediatric series, median age is around 15 years (Dourthe et al. 2018). NPC has a distinct epidemiology, etiology, and clinical course compared with other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, and its pathogenesis is multifactorial. Genetic predisposition and epigenetic alterations particularly related to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection play a major role in the initiation and progression of NPC (Dittmer et al. 2008; Sultan et al. 2010; Cheuk et al. 2011; Huang et al. 2018).
2 Symptoms
Young patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma frequently present with symptoms resulting from a mass effect from the primary tumor as well as frequent cervical lymph node metastasis (Fig. 10.1). Nasal symptoms, such as epistaxis and nasal obstruction, are almost always present and are secondary to the presence of the tumor in the nasopharynx. The second most common symptoms are otologic symptoms, such as hearing loss and tinnitus, which are related to the dysfunction of the Eustachian tube caused by the lateroposterior extension of the tumor into the paranasopharyngeal space. The third most common symptoms are cranial nerve palsies, mostly of the fifth and sixth cranial nerves, resulting from cranial extension of the tumor and skull base erosion; in addition, patients may experience headache, diplopia, facial pain, and numbness. A retrospective analysis of 4768 patients identified the following symptoms at presentation: neck mass (75.8%), nasal symptoms (73.4%), aural symptoms (62.4%), headache (34.8%), diplopia (10.7%), facial numbness (7.6%), weight loss (6.9%), and trismus (3.0%). The physical signs present at diagnosis were enlarged neck node (74.5%) and cranial nerve palsy (20.0%) (Lee et al. 1997). Since the nasal and auditory symptoms are nonspecific and a thorough examination of the nasopharynx is not easy, the majority of NPC patients are only diagnosed when the tumor has reached an advanced stage. Indeed, up to 90% of NPC patients present with lymph node metastases. Distant metastases are rare and can be detected in 5–10% of patients at diagnosis and most commonly involve bones (67%), liver (30%), bone marrow (23%), lungs (20%), and mediastinum (Altun et al. 1995; Ayan et al. 2003).
3 Pathogenesis
NPC presents as a complex disease caused by an interaction of the oncogenic gammaherpesvirus EBV chronic infection, environmental, and genetic factors, in a multistep carcinogenic process.
A monoclonal EBV infection is found in more than 98% of preinvasive lesions. The EBV-infected epithelial cells express the EBV antigens EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2 as well as the EBERs. In vitro and in vivo models have shown that LMP1 and, in particular, LMP2 as well as viral miRNAs, especially BART miRNA, play a major role in the malignant transformation of the NPC cells (Lo et al. 2012).
While nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare malignancy in most parts of the world, it is one of the most common cancers in Southeast Asia. Epidemiologic studies conducted in that region have provided an invaluable insight into our current understanding of NPC pathogenesis. The pathogenesis of NPC is influenced by three major factors: environmental factors, such as certain herbs and salted fish consumed in regions with an elevated incidence of NPC; genetic factors, as documented by familial cases that suggest a genetically determined susceptibility; and infectious factors, as documented by the evidence of early EBV infection (Ren et al. 2010).
3.1 Environmental Factors
A large number of case control studies conducted in diverse populations in Southeast Asia, Alaska, the Mediterranean basin, and North America have shown that consumption of salted fish and other preserved foods containing large amounts of nitrosodimethylamine may predispose to the development of NPC (Chang and Adami 2006).
3.2 Genetic Factors
Three independent genome-wide association studies have consistently identified single nucleotide polymorphisms in the MHC region to be strongly associated with an increased risk for NPC (Su et al. 2013). A consistent association between NPC and the prevalent Chinese HLA-A2 subtype (HLA-A*0207) but not the prevalent Caucasian subtype (HLA-A*0201) has been detected (Hildesheim et al. 2002). The HLA types AW19, BW46, and B17 have also been reported to be associated with an increased risk, whereas HLA-A11 is associated with a decreased risk (Liebowitz 1994).
3.3 Epstein–Barr Virus
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) or human herpes virus 4 (HHV4) is an oncogenic c-herpes virus. Under normal circumstances, EBV infection is restricted to humans, although some types of monkeys can be infected experimentally (Bornkamm 1984). EBV is consistently detected in NPC patients from regions of high and low incidence. Its ability to establish latent infection of host cells and to induce proliferation of the latently infected cells is directly involved in NPC pathogenesis (Niedobitek and Young 1994).
EBV-encoded RNA signal has been shown to be present in nearly all tumor cells, whereas EBV RNA is absent from the adjacent normal tissue, except perhaps for a few scattered lymphoid cells. Premalignant lesions of the nasopharyngeal epithelium have also been shown to harbor EBV RNA, which suggests that the infection occurs in the early phases of carcinogenesis. Detection of a single form of viral DNA suggests that the tumors are clonal proliferations of a single cell that was initially infected with EBV (Lo et al. 2000).
The EBV protein, latent membrane protein 2A (LMP2A), is expressed in NPC and can modulate epithelial proliferation, transformation, and differentiation and as such may promote malignancy (Huang et al. 2018). A key regulator of epithelial cell differentiation is the transcription factor p63, a member of the p53 family. The corresponding latent viral proteins (latent membrane proteins 1 and 2) have substantial effects on cellular gene expression and cellular growth, resulting in the highly invasive, malignant growth of the carcinoma (Fotheringham et al. 2010).
4 Pathology
In the past, NPC was called lymphoepithelioma, as the malignant epithelial cells of the nasopharynx frequently intermingled with lymphoid cells in the nasopharynx (Godtfredsen 1944). The histological classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1978 categorized tumors into three types. Type I are the typical keratinizing squamous cell carcinomas similar to those found in the rest of the upper aerodigestive tract. Type II includes nonkeratinizing squamous carcinomas and type III carcinomas are the undifferentiated carcinomas (Micheau et al. 1978; Shanmugaratnam 1980; Marks et al. 1998). In children and adolescents, the majority of NPC is WHO type III, whereas type I is not encountered (Ozyar et al. 2006; Jouin et al. 2019).
Table 10.1 shows the WHO classification modified by Krüger and Wustrow indicating the varying degrees of lymphoid infiltration, whereby the undifferentiated NPC with lymphoid infiltration corresponds to the entities described in 1921 as lymphoepithelioma by Schmincke and nonkeratinizing epithelium carcinoma by Regaud. These histological variants are strictly associated with increased titers against EBV antigen (Krueger and Wustrow 1981).
5 Staging System
For staging, the classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging (eighth edition of the AJCC stage groupings and TNM definitions) is internationally accepted (Amin et al. 2017).
5.1 Primary Tumor (T)
T0 | No tumor identified, but EBV-positive cervical node(s) involvement |
T1 | Tumor confined to nasopharynx, or extension to oropharynx and/or nasal cavity without parapharyngeal involvement |
T2 | Tumor with extension to parapharyngeal space and/or adjacent soft tissue involvement (medial pterygoid, lateral pterygoid, prevertebral muscles) |
T3 | Tumor with infiltration of bony structures at skull base, cervical vertebra, pterygoid structures, and/or paranasal sinuses |
T4 | Tumor with intracranial extension, involvement of cranial nerves, hypopharynx, orbit, parotid gland, and/or extensive soft tissue infiltration beyond the lateral surface of the lateral pterygoid muscle |
5.2 Regional Lymph Nodes (N)
N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis |
N1 | Unilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s) and/or unilateral or bilateral metastasis in retropharyngeal lymph node(s), 6 cm or smaller in greatest dimension, above the caudal border of cricoid cartilage |
N2 | Bilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), 6 cm or smaller in greatest dimension, above the caudal border of cricoid cartilage |
N3 | Unilateral or bilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), larger than 6 cm in greatest dimension, and/or extension below the caudal border of cricoid cartilage |
5.3 Distant Metastasis (M)
M0 | No distant metastasis |
M1 | Presence of distant metastasis |
5.4 Definition of Risk Groups
Risk groups are defined by the AJCC (eighth edition). Staging directly correlates with outcome, and in general, two large groups of patients are identified based on rates of local control and risk of metastatic disease. Patients with stages I–II have an excellent outcome, with survival rates in excess of 80–90%, whereas patients with stages III–IV have lower survival (Lee et al. 2005a, b; Wee et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2011) (Table 10.2) (Figs. 10.2 and 10.3).
6 Diagnosis
Clinical examination, including endoscopic examination of the nasopharynx, can provide very valuable information on mucosal involvement and local tumor extension and allows nasopharyngeal tumor biopsy. A definitive histological diagnosis should require a positive biopsy taken from the tumor in the nasopharynx, although a cervical nodal biopsy in the appropriate context may also be diagnostic. Major differential diagnoses of malignant tumors in the nasopharyngeal region in children are rhabdomyosarcoma and lymphoma.
Clinical examination cannot, however, determine a deep extension of the tumor, such as skull base erosion and intracranial spread (Colevas et al. 2018). Cross-sectional imaging has revolutionized the management of NPC. In terms of contribution to staging, MRI can identify the paranasopharyngeal extension as one of the most common modes of extension of NPC and perineural spread through the foramen ovale as an important route of intracranial extension (Sham et al. 1991). Perineural spread through the foramen ovale also accounts for the CT evidence of cavernous sinus involvement without skull base erosion (Chong et al. 1996). In addition, head and neck MRI helps to detect frequent cervical regional nodal involvement. Positron emission tomography (PET) may provide an additional tool for the initial diagnosis and staging and help in the evaluation of disease response after therapy (King et al. 2008; Buehrlen et al. 2012).
6.1 EBV DNA
Circulating free EBV DNA can be detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in patients (Mutirangura et al. 1998). A significant EBV DNaemia in plasma but not in cellular compartments of the peripheral blood is observed, and it is assumed that the EBV DNA is directly released from the tumor tissue. Ninety-five percent of patients are positive for EBV DNA in plasma at diagnosis (Leung et al. 2006). Various clinical studies have demonstrated that circulating EBV DNA concentrations correlate positively with disease stage as well as exhibit prognostic importance in NPC (Leung et al. 2003; Chan et al. 2003; Lin et al. 2004; Wagner et al. 2009). A meta-analysis comprising 14 prospective and retrospective studies with a total of 7836 NPC patients found that high pre-DNA, detectable mid-DNA, detectable post-DNA, and slow EBV DNA clearance rates were all significantly associated with poorer OS, with hazard radios (HRs) equal to 2.81, 3.29, 4.26, and 3.58, respectively. Pre-DNA, mid-DNA, and post-DNA had the same effects on PFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) (Zhang et al. 2015). Usually, patients achieving a complete remission become negative for EBV DNA in plasma, whereas patients with persistent or progressive disease remain positive or even show increasing EBV DNA plasma concentrations.
6.2 EBV Serology
Patients with EBV show an aberrant antibody response against EBV proteins. IgA antibodies against the EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) and early antigen (EA) have been demonstrated to precede the development of NPC. In a large prospective study in Taiwan, men from the general population who tested positive for IgA antibodies against the VCA protein had an increased risk of developing NPC compared to VCA IgA-negative men, an association that persisted even ≥5 years after antibody measurement (HR = 13.9; 95% CI 3.1–61.7) (Chien et al. 2001). Therefore, both antibodies have been used to screen for NPC in endemic regions. EBV-VCA IgA and EA IgA titers also correlate with tumor burden (Cai et al. 2010; Yao et al. 2017). Rising titers of EBV-EA IgA antibody have also been shown to predict relapse (de Vathaire et al. 1988).
6.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
The superior soft tissue resolution of MRI makes it an excellent modality in imaging of head and neck masses. It is particularly useful in delineating intracranial extension of disease and prepares further radiotherapy delineation. The examination is performed with the child supine in quiet respiration. Standard examination should include a T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) sequence in axial and coronal planes, a T2-weighted fat suppression or inversion recovery sequence, and a plain T1-weighted FSE or spin echo (SE) sequence (Lloyd and McHugh 2010). In evaluating mass lesions, a further fat-saturated T1-weighted SE sequence following gadolinium administration will often improve characterization of the mass. As MRI of the head and neck is nowadays the principal modality for delineation of the primary tumor and cervical lymph nodes, CT of the skull is only indicated if there is suspicion of bone invasion at the skull base (Colevas et al. 2018). Chest CT should be used for evaluation of pulmonary metastases either by itself or as part of FDG-PET/CT imaging.
6.4 Positron Emission Tomography
Various studies have investigated the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT as imaging modality in patients with NPC. In the GPOH-NPC-2003 study, all tumors were PET positive at initial diagnosis or at time of relapse (Buehrlen et al. 2012). A comparison of PET/CT with MRI and CT for staging in children with NPC concluded that PET/CT may underestimate tumor extent and regional lymphadenopathy compared with MRI at the time of diagnosis, but it helps to detect metastases and clarify ambiguous findings (Cheuk et al. 2012). [18F]FDG PET has been shown to be more sensitive than skeletal scintigraphy for detecting bone metastasis in endemic NPC at initial staging (Liu et al. 2008). A recent meta-analysis of 15 studies comprising 1938 patients with NPC confirms that high values of SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) predicted a higher risk of adverse events or death in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, despite clinically heterogeneous nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the various methods adopted between these studies (Lin et al. 2017). In addition, the decrease in the standardized uptake value (SUV) during therapy has been shown to be of prognostic value in NPC (Xie et al. 2010) and may help to better delineate tumor after chemotherapy to prepare radiotherapy plans. Therefore, [18F]FDG PET/CT is considered a valuable imaging modality for the evaluation and monitoring of NPC in pediatric patients.
7 Therapy
7.1 Chemotherapy
In children and adolescents with NPC, sensitivity to chemotherapy has been demonstrated as early as in the mid-70s (Ghim et al. 1998). Outcome has been analyzed in several retrospective studies, most of them with less than 50 patients, mostly heterogenous for the type of chemotherapy used and the dosage of radiotherapy applied; the reported 5-year overall and disease-free survival range between 41–94% and 47–85%, respectively, with more recent studies showing a better outcome than older ones (Zubarreta et al. 2000; Ozyar et al. 2006; Orbach et al. 2008; Afquir et al. 2009; Tao et al. 2013; Yan et al. 2013; Jouin et al. 2019). NPC in children and adolescents has so far been prospectively studied only in eight clinical trials (Ghim et al. 1998; Mertens et al. 2005; Rodriguez-Galindo et al. 2005; Buehrlen et al. 2012; Casanova et al. 2012; Casanova et al. 2016; Rodriguez-Galindo et al. 2016; Zaghloul et al. 2016). Due to the low incidence of the disease in children and adolescents, only one of these studies included a randomized question to be answered.
The first prospective study was a single institutional study conducted at Emory University Medical Center in Atlanta, USA, treating 12 patients aged 6–20 years during years 1976–1995 (Ghim et al. 1998). Eleven patients had locally advanced tumors; one had systemic metastases at diagnosis. Chemotherapy contained doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and was given before radiotherapy in four patients and with or after radiation in eight patients in 3-week cycles for up to 2 years. Radiation dosages to the primary tumor site were between 59 Gy and 68 Gy and to the neck between 59 Gy and 66 Gy. Nine patients remained in complete remission with a median follow-up of 9 years, one patient developed a secondary osteosarcoma of the mandible, one patient died of tuberculosis, and one patient was lost to follow-up in remission. In the Pediatric Oncology Group Study 9486, 17 patients below 22 years with nasopharyngeal cancer were evaluable for analysis (Rodriguez-Galindo et al. 2005). One patient with stage II disease was only irradiated, 16 patients with stage III/IV NPC received four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin, and 5-FU. Irradiation was given after the end of chemotherapy with a dose of 61.2 Gy to the primary tumor and positive lymph nodes, whereas 50.4 Gy were applied to non-involved lymph nodes of the upper neck and 45 Gy to non-involved ones of the lower neck. The 4-year EFS and OS rates were 77% and 75%, respectively. The NPC study of the Italian rare tumors in pediatric age project (TREP) treated 46 patients aged 9–17 during the years 2000–2009 (Casanova et al. 2012). Of these all but one patient had lymph node involvement and five had distant metastases. Patients received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU followed by radiotherapy. Radiation dosages were 65 Gy for the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes and 45 Gy for non-involved ones. The 4-year PFS and OS rates were 79.3 and 80.9%, respectively, including metastatic patients.
The NPC-91-GPOH study was the first multicenter study for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children, adolescents, and young adults (Mertens et al. 2005). Sixty-eight patients were registered, among them five patients with metastatic disease. Of the 59 protocol patients (58 “high-risk” patients and 1 “low-risk “patient, median age of 13, range: 8–25), high-risk patients were treated with induction chemotherapy consisting of three cycles of methotrexate, cisplatin and 5-FU, radiotherapy with a dosage of 59 Gy to the primary tumor and 45 Gy to locoregional lymph nodes, and maintenance therapy with interferon-β for 6 months. The estimated overall survival for the protocol patients after 9 years was 95% and the disease-free survival 91%. Therapy was complicated by severe mucositis requiring total parenteral nutrition in 46% of patients and dose reductions in subsequent cycles of chemotherapy in 30% of patients. In the NPC-2003 study, methotrexate was omitted because of increased toxicity in the NPC-91 study (Buehrlen et al. 2012). In addition, due to results on the benefit of concomitant radiochemotherapy in adults, cisplatin was given for 2 weeks during radiotherapy. A third change to the NPC-91 study was the reduction of the radiation dose of the primary tumor to 54 Gy in patients with complete tumor remission after induction chemotherapy. The study resulted in an overall survival of 97% after a median follow-up of 30 months and an event-free survival of 92% for non-metastatic patients. Follow-up after 52 months showed an overall survival of 93% and an event-free survival of 92% (unpublished).
The only randomized comparative prospective study in children and adolescent was an international study which involved 75 patients and was conducted in 13 countries from 2007 to 2008. The randomized question to be answered was whether the addition of docetaxel to the combination of cisplatin and 5-FU would increase the number of complete responses to induction chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the overall response rates between the standard arm (ORR 80%) and the experimental arm (ORR 78%). Also, no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival was noted (Casanova et al. 2016).
In the COG study ARAR0331, 111 patients with NPC, aged 11 to 18, were treated between 2006 and 2013 with 3 cycles of 5-FU and cisplatin containing chemotherapy. This was followed by radiochemotherapy with a dose to the primary tumor of 61.2 Gy in patients with complete or partial tumor remission after induction chemotherapy and 70 Gy in patients whose tumor did not respond to induction chemotherapy. Cisplatin was given as a radiosensitizer during radiotherapy initially at a dose of 300 mg/m2; however, it was subsequently reduced to 200 mg/m2 because of toxicity. Five-year overall survival and event-free survival rates were 88.2% and 85.5%, respectively (Rodriguez-Galindo et al. 2016). A recent update of the study shows 5-year EFS and OS estimates of 84.3% and 89.2%, respectively. The 5-year EFS for stages IIb, III, and IV were 100%, 82.8%, and 82.7%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence estimates of local, distant, and combined relapse were 3.7%, 8.7%, and 1.8%, respectively. Patients treated with 300 mg/m2 of cisplatin during radiation therapy had improved 5-year post-induction EFS compared to those who received 200 mg/m2 (90.7% vs. 81.2%, respectively, p = 0.14) (Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, personal communication).
In adults, the standard of therapy for locally advanced NPC has been for many years concomitant radiochemotherapy (Colevas et al. 2018). However, in the last years several large randomized studies have shown a benefit for induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concomitant radiochemotherapy (CCRT) versus radiochemotherapy alone. Recently, pooled analysis of 4 randomized studies comprising 1193 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC from endemic regions also demonstrated the superiority of additional IC over CCRT alone, with the survival benefit mainly associated with improved distant control.
7.2 Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy is the main treatment modality of NPC. The aims are to irradiate the primary nasopharyngeal tumor together with the initially involved lymph nodes as well as to prophylactically irradiate the remaining cervical lymph node regions. The major limitations of conventional 2D radiotherapy for NPC can now be overcome with three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). IMRT is an advanced form of 3D conformal radiotherapy, conforming high dose to tumor while conforming low dose to normal tissues (Wu et al. 2004; Wolden et al. 2006).
IMRT planning and dose optimization is fully computerized, a process known as inverse planning; thus, it is much preferred over the more expertise-dependent forward planning in 3D conformal radiotherapy (Hsiung et al. 2002; Jouin et al. 2019).
The use of IMRT in the treatment of NPC has multiple advantages. IMRT can be used for organ preservation, e.g., sparing the parotids of high-dose radiation will preserve salivary function after radiotherapy. IMRT can achieve good dose differential between the tumor and the dose-limiting organs and thus can achieve a high dose in the tumor without overdosing the normal organs. As the fractional dose will affect the biological effectiveness of radiation, there is a component of biological modulation of radiation besides just modulating the physical radiation dose in IMRT (Withers and Thames 1988).
Simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) employs this principle for accelerated radiotherapy with IMRT. IMRT resolves the problem of dose uncertainty at the junction between the primary tumor and neck lymphatic target volumes in conventional radiotherapy (Butler et al. 1999; Cheng et al. 2001).
Different series reported excellent local control of more than 90% in NPC achieved with IMRT, even among patients with advanced T3–4 diseases (Pow et al. 2006). Reports also showed preservation of salivary function and improved quality of life of survivors after IMRT (Wu et al. 2004). The superiority of IMRT versus conventional 2D radiotherapy was demonstrated in three prospective studies comparing the two treatment modalities in adult patients with NPC. Patients who underwent IMRT had significantly less late toxicities, especially hearing loss and xerostomia than patients who received conventional radiotherapy (Pow et al. 2006; Kam et al. 2007; Peng et al. 2012).
Considering the high incidence of severe late radiotherapy effects after NPC treatment even after IMRT, protons could be of interest in NPC, especially in children, adolescents, and young adults. The biological effect of protons is similar to photons, but the benefit expected is based on sharp dose fall-off, leading to a high therapeutic RT dose to the tumor with minimal exit dose, allowing for improved sparing of normal tissues (Taheri-Kadkhoda et al. 2008). The use of proton therapy, considered as the best technique for sparing critical organs, may induce less xerostomia and as a consequence less dental caries, as well as a potential reduction of ear and endocrine toxicities (Widesott et al. 2008). The place of this technique is still under investigation in pediatric NPC.
As cutting down late complications of treatment is one of the main objectives of pediatric clinical trials, another approach is adapting the dose of radiotherapy depending on the tumor response to induction chemotherapy. Such an approach has been taken by some national groups (French Group Fracture, German GPHO, or North American COG). Here, reduction of the dosage of radiation has been shown feasible in patients with a favorable response to induction chemotherapy, and it is assumed that this will lead to a decrease in long-term effects (Buehrlen et al. 2012; Rodriguez-Galindo et al. 2016; Jouin et al. 2019).
Radiotherapy in pediatric and adult NPC patients is nowadays combined with chemotherapy, usually cisplatin. This is based on several trials in adults which have confirmed the superiority of radiochemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in advanced locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A meta-analysis comprising data on 1834 patients included in 7 adult trials showed that overall as well as progression-free survival was significantly improved in patients with radiochemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone (Blanchard et al. 2015). However, concomitant radiochemotherapy is associated with significant morbidity like severe mucositis requiring nutritional support, leading to lower dosages of cisplatin in most pediatric protocols compared to adult ones (Casanova et al. 2012; Buehrlen et al. 2012; Rodriguez-Galindo et al. 2016). As the benefit of concomitant radiochemotherapy has been established in adults who have not received previous induction chemotherapy, its role in pediatric NPC patients whose treatment concept includes induction chemotherapy for most patients is less clear.
7.3 Interferon Therapy
Interferon-β was introduced as a maintenance therapy into the GPOH studies after a boy with a second systemic NPC relapse went into a long-lasting complete remission with interferon-β alone, and response rates of around 25% were achieved in NPC patients with refractory disease treated with interferon-β (Treuner et al. 1980; Mertens et al. 1993). In the GPOH-NPC-91 and NPC-2003-GPOH studies, event-free survival rates were >90%, although radiation dosages were lower compared to other pediatric NPC protocols (Kontny et al. 2016). As NPC relapses are predominantly systemic, it is assumed that interferon-β improves systemic disease control. Recent preclinical data show that interferon-β induces the expression of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) in NPC cells which subsequently elicits apoptosis via an intact TRAIL signaling pathway in an autocrine and paracrine manner (Makowska et al. 2018). Interferon-ß also activates natural killer cells and increases their killing of NPC cells in vitro (Makowska et al. 2019a). In NPC patients, interferon-ß increases the killing activity of NK cells against NPC cells and also increases levels of circulating soluble TRAIL which could contribute to the elimination of residual micrometastic disease (Makowska et al. 2019b).
In the German studies NPC-91-GPOH and NPC-2003-GPOH, all patients underwent 6 months of treatment with recombinant interferon-β or native interferon-β after completion of radiation therapy, receiving a dose of 105 U per kg body weight (max. dose: 6 × 106 U) intravenously (native interferon-β) or subcutaneously (recombinant interferon-β) three times a week. The favorable results of this strategy plead in favor of the use of this drug, but one should take into consideration that no comparative studies have proved the precise value of the maintenance therapy in this disease in young patients yet.
8 Metastatic Disease
Distant metastases are present in about 10% of patients with NPC at diagnosis. Although tumors and metastases usually respond to induction chemotherapy, most patients relapse and eventually die of their disease (Leong et al. 2008). However, patients with solitary or few osseous metastases or isolated lung metastasis have been shown to achieve long-term remissions, if they were treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy to the primary tumor and the metastatic lesions (Fandi et al. 2000). Recently, a large, randomized study in adults with metastatic or relapsed NPC demonstrated that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy was superior to the cisplatin/5-FU regimen as it significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (7.0 months versus 5.6 months) (Zhang et al. 2016).
9 New Treatment Strategies
9.1 T Cell Therapy
EBV-specific cytotoxic T cell (CTL) lines can readily be generated from individuals with NPC, notwithstanding patients’ prior exposure to chemotherapy/radiation. In a pilot study, patients diagnosed with advanced NPC were treated with autologous CTLs. All patients tolerated the CTLs, although one developed increased swelling at the site of preexisting disease. The administration of EBV-specific CTLs to patients with advanced NPC was feasible, appears to be safe, and could be associated with significant antitumor activity (Comoli et al. 2005).
The EBV-specific CTLs used in this study were reactivated using LCLs that express all EBV latent antigens. LCLs are excellent antigen-presenting cells that are readily available for all patients, as only a limited amount of blood are required to establish an LCL line. As expected using this method, only a minority of the infused lines contained cytotoxic T cells specific for LMP2 (an EBV antigen usually expressed by NPC tumor cell mononuclear cells). Although there was no persistent rise in the frequency of circulating T cells specific for LMP2 after infusion, the CTLs appeared to show significant antitumor activity.
The EBV-specific CTLs were biologically active in vivo, reducing levels of EBV DNA in peripheral blood (Louis et al. 2010; Comoli et al. 2005).
9.2 Checkpoint Inhibition
As tumors of NPC patients from endemic regions and tumors from children show marked infiltration by lymphomononuclear cells, one could assume that measures to increase an immune response against NPC could lead to control of the disease. Inhibition of host tumor immune responses by negative checkpoints, such as the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint, has been demonstrated in various tumors, and blockade of immune checkpoints has led to impressive results in the treatment of various diseases such as melanoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. NPC tumor cells express the immune effector cell inhibiting ligand PD-L1 in about 95% of tumors; therefore, blocking of the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction was also hypothesized to increase antitumor immunity in NPC. In two phase II trials in which patients with therapy-refractory nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated with the anti-PD1 antibodies pembrolizumab or nivolumab, an overall response rate of 26% and stable disease rate of 42%, and 20% and 34.1%, respectively, were observed (Hsu et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2018). Currently, the addition of PD-1 checkpoint inhibition to standard treatment for NPC is evaluated in several randomized trials in adults with newly diagnosed NPC.
9.3 Targeted Therapy
Like other squamous head and neck carcinomas, NPC tumors mostly express epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (Fujii et al. 2002). However, neither the EGFR-blocking antibody cetuximab nor the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib which inhibit the tyrosine kinase domain of the EGFR proved to have a significant effect on tumor growth in patients with recurrent or metastatic NPC in phase II trials (Perri et al. 2019). Vascular endothelial growth factor expression (VEGF-R) has been found in 60–70% of NPC tumors. Several VEGF-R-blocking TKIs have been investigated in phase II clinical trials in patients with recurrent or metastatic NPC with modest efficacy but significant toxicity (Elser et al. 2007; Hui et al. 2011; Lim et al. 2011).
10 Long-Term Sequelae
Survivors of NPC following radiotherapy or chemoradiation have impaired health-related quality of life. Patients may suffer from a variety of late complications, many of which result from the effects of radiation on dose-limiting organs situated adjacent to the nasopharynx and cervical lymph node (Huang et al. 1994). NPC survivors almost uniformly develop hypothyroidism secondary to neck irradiation and also are at risk for panhypopituitarism resulting from pituitary damage (Cheuk et al. 2011). A close endocrine follow-up is thus required for early diagnosis and intervention (Fang et al. 2002). Ototoxicity is also very common, and its incidence is particularly higher in patients receiving chemotherapy in addition to radiation, which often involved the auditory apparatus. A small proportion of the long-term sequelae represent the effects of unhealed residual damage by the tumor, such as residual cranial nerve palsies and serous otitis media resulting from persistent disturbance of the Eustachian tube function (McMillan et al. 2004).
In up to 8.5% of the NPC patients, subsequent malignancies developed 8.6–27 years after NPC diagnosis (Cheuk et al.2011). The 15-year cumulative incidence of any morbidity, sensorineural hearing loss, primary hypothyroidism, and growth hormone deficiency related to the stage were 84%, 53%, 43%, and 14%, respectively. There are dose-response relationships between radiotherapy dose and primary hypothyroidism and growth hormone deficiency (Ulger et al. 2007). In addition, three prospective studies comparing IMRT and conventional radiotherapy in patients with NPC all demonstrated that patients treated with IMRT had significantly less late toxicities than patients who underwent conventional radiotherapy (Pow et al. 2006; Kam et al. 2007; Peng et al. 2012). These frequent long-term toxicities associated with an overall nowadays good prognosis helped to propose adapted dose radiotherapy to induction chemotherapy in order to try to reduce sequelae in patients with favorable response.
11 Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma
11.1 Introduction
Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) is a rare tumor with prominent vascularity and benign histological features. It originates from the superior margin of the sphenopalatine foramen, which is also a route for the sphenopalatine artery branching from the internal maxillary artery (Schuon et al. 2007; Tosun et al. 2006).
The reported incidence of JNA is between 1 in 6000 and 1 in 60,000 otolaryngology patients. It accounts for 0.5% of all head and neck neoplasms, and it is considered to be the most common benign neoplasm of the nasopharynx (Mann et al. 2004; Glad et al. 2007). JNA predominately affects male children and adolescents between the ages of 9 and 19 (Gullane et al. 1992). Although histologically benign in appearance, JNAs are locally aggressive and destructive, spreading from the nasal cavity to the nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses, and orbit skull base with intracranial extension in 10–20%.
11.2 Symptoms
The most common presenting symptom is persistent nasal obstruction with repetitive epistaxis.
Further classical clinical presentation is unilateral nasal block and/or rhinorrhea and occasionally pain. Because of its invasive nature, the tumor may cause facial deformity and proptosis, changes in visual acuity, and cranial nerve palsy if it reaches the orbit and intracranial region (Weprin and Siemers 1991; Tyagi et al. 2007). Differential diagnoses include parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma, NPC, or diffuse lymphoma.
11.3 Pathogenesis
The gender selectivity of JNA, with a high male-to-female ratio, and the relatively young age at diagnosis suggest hormone-dependent development. Hormonal disorders have been reported in patients with JNA, and androgen and estrogen receptors have been identified in tumor tissue; however, a hormonal influence on JNA is controversial. Recent studies have attempted to further delineate the pathogenesis of JNA through analysis of genetic and molecular changes. While JNA is known to be sensitive to androgens, there are likely intermediary cytokines and/or growth factors that mediate aggressive stoma cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) is a polypeptide that is secreted in an inactive form, cleaved to produce an active form, and then deactivated in the tissues. The location of activated TGF-beta1 to the fibroblasts and endothelial cells within JNA tumors suggests that TGF-beta1 may play a role in the stromal cell proliferation and angiogenesis associated with JNA (Lee et al. 1980; Liang et al. 2000; Saylam et al. 2006; Ngan et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2003).
11.4 Diagnosis
The diagnosis of JNA is based on a precise clinical history and examination of the patient and imaging (head and neck MRI or CT). Tissue biopsies should be avoided due to the highly vascular nature of the tumor. Angiography is used to define the feeding arteries of the tumor and to provide information for embolization (Nicolai et al. 2003; Jacobsson et al. 1989).
Various staging systems have been proposed. In the Andrews staging system (Table 10.3), JNA is classified as Type I when the tumor is restricted to the nasal cavity and the nasopharynx without bone destruction; Type II when the tumor invades the pterygomaxillary fossa and maxillary, sphenoidal, and ethmoid sinuses with bone destruction; Type III when the tumor invades the intratemporal fossa, the orbit, and the parasellar region but remaining lateral to the cavernous sinus; and Type IV when the tumor invades the cavernous sinus, the optic chiasma, and the pituitary fossa (Howard et al. 2001).
11.5 Therapy
The management of JNA has changed during the last decades. It is generally agreed that surgery is the treatment of choice for all uncomplicated primary and recurrent JNA (López et al. 2017). Preoperative selective arterial embolization is almost always indicated as it helps to decrease the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage and facilitates the resection of large tumors. The management of JNA should be planned by an experienced head and neck surgeon, as part of a multidisciplinary team, preferably in a tertiary referral setting. Surgery aims for a complete and safe resection of tumor, with minimal morbidity and loss of blood. A transpalatal or transmaxillar (lateral rhinotomy or midfacial) approach is usually performed (Belmont 1988; Dubey and Molumi 2007).
For stages I and II, a transpalatal approach results in good outcome when the lesion is limited to the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, and paranasal sinuses. For patients with intracranial extension, the LeFort I surgical technique should be used. Involvement of the orbit, middle cranial fossa, and base of the pterygoid by the primary JNA results in a higher incidence of recurrent tumor (Borghei et al. 2006; Yiotakis et al. 2008).
Recurrence rates as high as 50% (ranging from 6 to 50%) have been reported (Reddy et al. 2001). Radiotherapy may be considered for advanced, incompletely resectable cases and cases with a high morbidity of resection (López et al. 2017). Chemotherapy has been suggested for recurrences and selected cases with aggressive growth (Goepfert et al. 1985). In post-pubertal patients, hormonal therapy with flutamide, an androgen receptor antagonist, has been used preoperatively to achieve tumor regression and facilitate surgical resection; this approach was successful in some but not all patients treated (Labra et al. 2004; Thakar et al. 2011). Since strong vascularity is a common feature of JNAs, it has been suggested that antiangiogenic therapies ought to be considered in the management of selected cases; however, clinical data have been lacking so far (Hashizume et al. 2010; López et al. 2017).
References
Afquir S, Alaoui K, Ismaili N et al (2009) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in adolescents: a retrospective review of 42 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1767–1773
Altun M, Fandi A, Dupuis O, Cvitkovic E, Krajina Z, Eschwege F (1995) Undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancer (UCNT): current diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(3):859–877
Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL et al (eds) (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, New York, pp 103–111
Ayan I, Kaytan E, Ayan N (2003) Childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma: from biology to treatment. Lancet Oncol 4:13–21
Belmont JR (1988) The Le Fort I osteotomy approach for nasopharyngeal and nasal fossa tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114:751–754
Blanchard P, Lee A, Marguet S, Leclercq J, Ng WT, Ma J, Chan AT, Huang PY, Benhamou E, Zhu G, Chua DT, Chen Y, Mai HQ, Kwong DL, Cheah SL, Moon J, Tung Y, Chi KH, Fountzilas G, Zhang L, Hui EP, Lu TX, Bourhis J, Pignon JP, MAC-NPC Collaborative Group (2015) Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the MAC-NPC meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 16(6):645–655
Borghei P, Baradaranfar MH, Borghei SH, Sokhandon F (2006) Transnasal endoscopic resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma without preoperative embolization. Ear Nose Throat J 85:740–743, 746
Bornkamm GW (1984) Virologisch-serologische Diagnostik des Nasopharynxkarzinoms. In: Nasopharynx-Tumoren. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München-Wien-Baltimore, pp 15–21
Bray F, Haugen M et al (2008) Age-incidence curves of nasopharyngeal carcinoma worldwide: bimodality in low-risk populations and aetiologic implications. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17(9):2356–2365
Buehrlen M, Zwaan C, Granzen B et al (2012) Multimodal treatment, including interferon beta, of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and young adults. Cancer 118:4892–4900
Butler EB, Teh BS, Grant WH 3rd, Uhl BM, Kuppersmith RB, Chiu JK et al (1999) Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45(1):21–32
Cai YL, Zheng YM, Cheng JR, Wang W, Zhang YN, Wang WH, Wu YS, Zhong WM, Li J, Mo YK (2010) Relationship between clinical stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and Epstein-Barr virus antibodies Rta/IgG, EBNA1/IgA, VCA/IgA and EA/IgA. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 30(3):509–511
Casanova M, Bisogno G, Gandola L, Cechetto G, Di Cataldo A, Basso E, Indolfi P, D’Angelo P, Favini F, Collini P, Potepan P, Ferrari A (2012) A prospective protocol for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adolescents. Cancer 118:2718–2725
Casanova M, Özyar E, Patte C, Orbach D, Ferrari A, Veyrat-Follet C, Errihani H, Pan J, Zhang L, Shen L, Grzegorzewski KJ, Varan A (2016) International randomized phase 2 study on the addition of docetaxel to the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in the induction treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adolescents. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77:289–298
Chan KH, Gu YL, Ng F, Ng PS, Seto WH, Sham JS, Chua D, Wei W, Chen YL, Luk W, Zong YS, Ng MH (2003) EBV specific antibody-based and DNA-based assays in serologic diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer 105(5):706–709
Chang ET, Adami HO (2006) The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(10):1765–1777
Chen QY, Wen YF, Guo L, Liu H, Huang PY, Mo HY, Li NW, Xiang YQ, Luo DH, Qiu F, Sun R, Deng MQ, Chen MY, Hua YJ, Guo X, Cao KJ, Hong MH, Qian CN, Mai HQ (2011) Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(23):1761–1770
Cheng JC, Chao KS, Low D (2001) Comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment techniques for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer 96(2):126–131
Cheuk DK, Billups CA, Martin MG, Roland CR, Ribeiro RC, Krasin MJ, Rodriguez-Galindo C (2011) Prognostic factors and long-term outcomes of childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 117(1):197–206
Cheuk DK, Sabin ND, Hossain M, Wozniak A, Najk M (2012) PET/CT for staging and follow-up of pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:1097–1106
Chien YC, Chen JY, Liu MY, Yang HI, Hsu MM, Chen CJ, Yang CS (2001) Serologic markers of Epstein-Barr virus infection and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwanese men. N Engl J Med 345(26):1877–1882
Chong VF, Fan YF, Khoo JB (1996) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intracranial spread: CT and MR characteristics. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20(4):563–569
Colevas AD, Yom SS, Pfister DG, Spencer S, Adelstein D, Adkins D, Brizel DM, Burtness B, Busse PM, Caudell JJ, Cmelak AJ, Eisele DW, Fenton M, Foote RL, Gilbert J, Gillison ML, Haddad RI, Hicks WL, Hitchcock YJ, Jimeno A, Leizman D, Maghami E, Mell LK, Mittal BB, Pinto HA, Ridge JA, Rocco J, Rodriguez CP, Shah JP, Weber RS, Witek M, Worden F, Zhen W, Burns JL, Darlow SD (2018) NCCN guidelines insights: head and neck cancers, version 1.2018. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 16(5):479–490
Comoli P, Pedrazzoli P, Maccario R et al (2005) Cell therapy of stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma with autologous Epstein-Barr virus-targeted cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Clin Oncol 23:8942–8949
de Vathaire F, Sancho-Garnier H, de Thé H, Pieddeloup C, Schwaab G, Ho JH, Ellouz R, Micheau C, Cammoun M, Cachin Y et al (1988) Prognostic value of EBV markers in the clinical management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): a multicenter follow-up study. Int J Cancer 42(2):176–181
Dittmer DP, Hilscher CJ, Gulley ML, Yang EV, Chen M, Glaser R (2008) Multiple pathways for Epstein-Barr virus episome loss from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer 123(9):2105–2112
Dourthe ME, Bolle S, Temam S, Jouin A, Claude L, Reguerre Y, Defachelles AS, Orbach D, Fresneau B (2018) Childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma: state-of-the-art, and questions for the future. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 40(2):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000001054. PMID: 29300240
Dubey SP, Molumi CP (2007) Critical look at the surgical approaches of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma excision and “total maxillary swing” as a possible alternative. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116:723–730
Elser C, Siu LL, Winquist E, Agulnik M, Pond GR, Chin SF, Francis P, Cheiken R, Elting J, McNabola A, Wilkie D, Petrenciuc O, Chen EX (2007) Phase II trial of sorafenib in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25(24):3766–3773
Fandi A, Bachouchi M, Azli N, Taamma A, Boussen H, Wibault P, Eschwege F, Armand JP, Simon J, Cvitkovic E (2000) Long-term disease-free survivors in metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type. J Clin Oncol 18(6):1324–1330
Fang FM, Chiu HC, Kuo WR, Wang CJ, Leung SW, Chen HC et al (2002) Health-related quality of life for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cancer-free survival after treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53(4):959–968
Fotheringham JA, Mazzucca S, Raab-Traub N (2010) Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-2A-induced DeltaNp63 alpha expression is associated with impaired epithelial-cell differentiation. Oncogene 29(30):4287–4296
Fujii M, Yamashita T, Ishiguro R, Tashiro M, Kameyama K (2002) Significance of epidermal growth factor receptor and tumor associated tissue eosinophilia in the prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Auris Nasus Larynx 29(2):175–181
Ghim TT, Briones M, Mason P et al (1998) Effective adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children: a final update of a long-term prospective study in a single institution. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 20:131–135
Glad H, Vainer B, Buchwald C, Petersen BL, Theilgaard SA, Bonvin P, Lajer C, Jakobsen J (2007) Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas in Denmark 1981–2003: diagnosis, incidence, and treatment. Acta Otolaryngol 127:292–299
Godtfredsen E (1944) Chapter III: on the histopathology of malignant nasopharyngeal tumours. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 32(Suppl 59):38–56
Goepfert H, Cangir A, Lee YY (1985) Chemotherapy for aggressive juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Arch Otolaryngol 111(5):285–289
Gullane PJ, Davidson J, O’Dwyer T, Forte V (1992) Juvenile angiofibroma: a review of the literature and a case series report. Laryngoscope 102(8):928–933
Hashizume H, Falcon BL, Kuroda T, Baluk P, Coxon A, Yu D, Bready JV, Oliner JD, McDonald DM (2010) Complementary actions of inhibitors of angiopoietin-2 and VEGF on tumor angiogenesis and growth. Cancer Res 70:2213–2223
Hildesheim A, Apple RJ, Chen CJ, Wang SS, Cheng YJ, Klitz W, Mack SJ, Chen IH, Hsu MM, Yang CS, Brinton LA, Levine PH, Erlich HA (2002) Association of HLA class I and II alleles and extended haplotypes with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(23):1780–1789
Howard DJ, Lloyd G, Lund V (2001) Recurrence and its avoidance in juvenile angiofibroma. Laryngoscope 111:1509–1511
Hsiung CY, Yorke ED, Chui CS, Hunt MA, Ling CC, Huang EY et al (2002) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for boost or salvage treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53(3):638–647
Hsu C, Lee SH, Ejadi S, Even C, Cohen RB, Le Tourneau C, Mehnert JM, Algazi A, van Brummelen EMJ, Saraf S, Thanigaimani P, Cheng JD, Hansen AR (2017) Safety and antitumor activity of Pembrolizumab in patients with programmed death-ligand 1-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results of the KEYNOTE-028 study. J Clin Oncol 35(36):4050–4056
Huang TS, Huang SC, Hsu MM (1994) A prospective study of hypothalamus pituitary function after cranial irradiation with or without radiosensitizing chemotherapy. J Endocrinol Invest 17(8):615–623
Huang SCM, Tsao SW, Tsang CM (2018) Interplay of viral infection, host cell factors and tumor microenvironment in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 10(4):106
Hui EP, Ma BB, King AD, Mo F, Chan SL, Kam MK, Loong HH, Ahuja AT, Zee BC, Chan AT (2011) Hemorrhagic complications in a phase II study of sunitinib in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma who has previously received high-dose radiation. Ann Oncol 22(6):1280–1287
Jacobsson M, Petruson B, Ruth M, Svendsen P (1989) Involution of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma with intracranial extension. A case report with computed tomographic assessment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115:238–239
Jouin A, Helfre S, Bolle S, Claude L, Laprie A, Bogart E, Vigneron C, Potet H, Ducassou A, Claren A, Riet FG, Castex MP, Faure-Conter C, Fresneau B, Defachelles AS, Orbach D (2019) Adapted strategy to tumor response in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the French experience. Strahlenther Onkol 195(6):504–516
Kam MK, Leung SF, Zee B, Chau RM, Suen JJ, Mo F et al (2007) Prospective randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol 25(31):4873–4879
King AD, Ma BB, Yau YY, Zee B, Leung SF, Wong JK, Kam MK, Ahuja AT, Chan AT (2008) The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma at diagnosis. Br J Radiol 81(964):291–298
Kontny U, Franzen S, Behrends U, Bührlen M, Christiansen H, Delecluse H, Eble M, Feuchtinger T, Gademann G, Granzen B, Kratz CP, Lassay L, Leuschner I, Mottaghy FM, Schmitt C, Staatz G, Timmermann B, Vorwerk P, Wilop S, Wolff HA, Mertens R (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adolescents—recommendations of the GPOH-NPC Study Group. Klin Padiatr 228:105–112
Krueger GRF, Wustrow J (1981) Current classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma at Cologne University. In: Grundmann E, Krueger GRF, Ablashi DV (eds) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, vol 5. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 11–15
Labra A, Chavolla-Magaña R, Lopez-Ugalde A, Alanis-Calderon J, Huerta-Delgado A (2004) Flutamide as a preoperative treatment in juvenile angiofibroma (JA) with intracranial invasion: report of 7 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(4):466–699
Lee DA, Rao BR, Meyer JS, Prioleau PG, Bauer WC (1980) Hormonal receptor determination in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas. Cancer 46:547–551
Lee AW, Foo W, Law SC, Poon YF, Sze WM, O S K, Tung SY, Lau WH (1997) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: presenting symptoms and duration before diagnosis. Hong Kong Med J 3(4):355–361
Lee AW, Lau WH, Tung SY, Chua DT, Chappell R, Xu L et al (2005a) Preliminary results of a randomized study on therapeutic gain by concurrent chemotherapy for regionally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: NPC-9901 trial by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23(28):6966–6975
Lee AW, Sze WM, Au JS, Leung SF, Leung TW, Chua DT, Zee BC, Law SC, Teo PM, Tung SY, Kwong DL, Lau WH (2005b) Treatment results for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era: the Hong Kong experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61(4):1107–1116
Leong SS, Wee J, Rajan S, Toh CK, Lim WT, Hee SW, Tay MH, Poon D, Tan EH (2008) Triplet combination of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by maintenance 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 113(6):1332–1337
Leung SF, Chan AT, Zee B, Ma B, Chan LY, Johnson PJ et al (2003) Pretherapy quantitative measurement of circulating Epstein-Barr virus DNA is predictive of posttherapy distant failure in patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma of undifferentiated type. Cancer 98(2):288–291
Leung SF, Zee B, Ma BB, Hui EP, Mo F, Lai M, Chan KC, Chan LY, Kwan WH, Lo YM, Chan AT (2006) Plasma Epstein-Barr viral deoxyribonucleic acid quantitation complements tumor-node-metastasis staging prognostication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24(34):5414–5418
Liang J, Yi Z, Lianq P (2000) The nature of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:475–481
Liebowitz D (1994) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the Epstein-Barr virus association. Semin Oncol 21(3):376–381
Lim WT, Ng QS, Ivy P, Leong SS, Singh O, Chowbay B, Gao F, Thng CH, Goh BC, Tan DS, Koh TS, Toh CK, Tan EH (2011) A phase II study of pazopanib in Asian patients with recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 17(16):5481–5489
Lin JC, Wang WY, Chen KY, Wei YH, Liang WM, Jan JS et al (2004) Quantification of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 350(24):2461–2470
Lin J, Xie G, Liao G, Wang B, Yan M, Li H, Yuan Y (2017) Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systemic review and metaanalysis. Oncotarget 8:33884–33896
Liu FY, Chang JT, Wang HM, Liao CT, Kang CJ, Ng SK, Chan SC, Yen TC (2008) (18F) Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is more sensitive than skeletal scintigraphy for detecting bone metastasis in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma at initial staging. J Clin Oncol 24:599–604
Lloyd C, McHugh K (2010) The role of radiology in head and neck tumours in children. Cancer Imaging 10:49–61
Lo YM, Leung SF, Chan LY, Chan AT, Lo KW, Johnson PJ et al (2000) Kinetics of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA during radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Res 60(9):2351–2355
Lo AK, Dawson CW, Jin DY, Lo KW (2012) The pathological roles of BART miRNAs in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Pathol 227(4):392–403
López F, Triantafyllou A, Snyderman CH, Hunt JL, Suárez C, Lund VJ, Strojan P, Saba NF, Nixon IJ, Devaney KO, Alobid I, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Hanna EY, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A (2017) Nasal juvenile angiofibroma: current perspectives with emphasis on management. Head Neck 39(5):1033–1045
Louis CU, Straathof K, Bollard CM et al (2010) Adoptive transfer of EBV-specific T cells results in sustained clinical responses in patients with locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Immunother 33:983–990
Ma BBY, Lim WT, Goh BC, Hui EP, Lo KW, Pettinger A, Foster NR, Riess JW, Agulnik M, Chang AYC, Chopra A, Kish JA, Chung CH, Adkins DR, Cullen KJ, Gitlitz BJ, Lim DW, To KF, Chan KCA, Lo YMD, King AD, Erlichman C, Yin J, Costello BA, Chan ATC (2018) Antitumor activity of Nivolumab in recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an international, multicenter study of the Mayo Clinic phase 2 consortium (NCI-9742). J Clin Oncol 36(14):1412–1418
Makowska A, Wahab L, Braunschweig T, Kapetanakis N, Vokuhl C, Denecke B, Shen L, Busson P, Kontny U (2018) Interferon beta induces apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells via the TRAIL-signaling pathway. Oncotarget 9:14228–14250
Makowska A, Braunschweig T, Denecke B, Shen L, Baloche V, Busson P, Kontny U (2019a) Interferon beta and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade cooperate in NK cell-mediated killing of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Transl Oncol 12(9):1237–1256
Makowska A, Franzen S, Braunschweig T, Denecke B, Shen L, Baloche V, Busson P, Kontny U (2019b) Interferon-beta increases NK cell cytotoxicity against tumor cells in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma via tumor necrosis factor apoptosis-inducing ligand. Cancer Immunol Immunother 68(8):1317–1329
Mann WJ, Jecker P, Amedee RG (2004) Juvenile angiofibromas: changing surgical concept over the last 20 years. Laryngoscope 114:291–293
Marks JE, Phillips JL, Menck HR (1998) The National Cancer Data Base report on the relationship of race and national origin to the histology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 83(3):582–588
McMillan AS, Pow EH, Leung WK, Wong MC, Kwong DL (2004) Oral health-related quality of life in southern Chinese following radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Oral Rehabil 31(6):600–608
Mertens R, Lassay L, Heimann G (1993) Combined treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer in children and adolescents—concept of a study. Klin Padiatr 205:241–248
Mertens R, Granzen B, Lassay L, Bucsky P, Hundgen M, Stetter G, Heimann G, Weiss C, Hess CF, Gademann G (2005) Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adolescents: definitive results of a multicenter study (NPC-91-GPOH). Cancer 104(5):1083–1089
Micheau C, Rilke F, Pilotti S (1978) Proposal for a new histopathological classification of the carcinomas of the nasopharynx. Tumori 64(5):513–518
Mutirangura A, Pornthanakasem W, Theamboonlers A, Sriuranpong V, Lertsanguansinchi P, Yenrudi S, Voravud N, Supiyaphun P, Poovorawan Y (1998) Epstein-Barr viral DNA in serum of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 4(3):665–669
Ngan BY, Forte V, Campisi P (2008) Molecular angiogenic signaling in angiofibromas after embolization: implications for therapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:1170–1176
Nicolai P, Berlucchi M, Tomenzoli D, Cappiello J, Trimarchi M, Maroldi R, Battaglia G, Antonelli AR (2003) Endoscopic surgery for juvenile angiofibroma: when and how. Laryngoscope 113:775–782
Niedobitek G, Young LS (1994) Epstein-Barr virus persistence and virus-associated tumors. Lancet 343:333–335
Orbach D, Brisse H, Helfre S et al (2008) Radiation and chemotherapy combination for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children: radiotherapy dose adaptation after chemotherapy response to minimize late effects. Pediatr Blood Cancer 50:849–853
Ozyar E, Selek U, Laskar S et al (2006) Treatment results of 165 pediatric patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a Rare Cancer Network study. Radiother Oncol 81:39–46
Peng G, Wang T, Yang KY, Zhang S, Zhang T, Li Q, Han J, Wu G (2012) A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 104(3):286–293
Perri F, Della Vittoria Scarpati G, Caponigro F, Ionna F, Longo F, Buonopane S, Muto P, Di Marzo M, Pisconti S, Solla R (2019) Management of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current perspectives. Onco Targets Ther 12:1583–1591
Pow EH, Kwong DL, McMillan AS, Wong MC, Sham JS, Leung LH et al (2006) Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(4):981–991
Reddy KA, Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Stringer SP, Cassisi NJ (2001) Long-term results of radiation therapy for juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Am J Otolaryngol 22:172–175
Ren ZF, Liu WS, Qin HD, Xu YF, Yu DD, Feng QS, Chen LZ, Shu XO, Zeng YX, Jia W (2010) Effect of family history of cancers and environmental factors on risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Guangdong, China. Cancer Epidemiol 34(4):419–424
Rodriguez-Galindo C, Wofford M, Castleberry RP, Swanson GP, London WB, Fontanesi J, Pappo AS, Douglass EC (2005) Preradiation chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin for pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 103(4):850–857
Rodriguez-Galindo C, Krailo MD, Krasin MJ, McCarville MB, Hicks J, Pashankar F, Pappo AS (2016) Treatment of childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma (cNPC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT): results of the Children’s Oncology Group ARAR0331 study. J Clin Oncol 34 (suppl; abstr 10513)
Saylam G, Yucel OT, Sungur A, Onerci M (2006) Proliferation, angiogenesis and hormonal markers in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70:227–234
Schuon R, Brieger J, Heinrich UR, Roth Y, Szyfter W, Mann WJ (2007) Immunohistochemical analysis of growth mechanisms in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:389–394
Sham JS, Cheung YK, Choy D, Chan FL, Leong L (1991) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: CT evaluation of patterns of tumor spread. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 12(2):265–270
Shanmugaratnam K (1980) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: epidemiology, histopathology and aetiology. Ann Acad Med Singap 9(3):289–295
Su WH, Hildesheim A, Chang YS (2013) Human leukocyte antigens and Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: old associations offer new clues into the role of immunity in infection-associated cancers. Front Oncol 3:299
Sultan I, Casanova M et al (2010) Differential features of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adults: a SEER study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55(2):279–284
Taheri-Kadkhoda Z, Björk-Eriksson T, Nill S, Wilkens JJ, Oelfke U, Johansson K-A et al (2008) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comparative treatment planning study of photons and protons. Radiat Oncol 3(1):4
Tao CJ, Liu X, Tang LL et al (2013) Long-term outcome and late toxicities of simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy in pediatric and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer 32:525–532
Thakar A, Gupta G, Bhalla AS, Jain V, Sharma SC, Sharma R, Bahadur S, Deka RC (2011) Adjuvant therapy with flutamide for presurgical volume reduction in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Head Neck 33(12):1747–1753
Tosun S, Ozer C, Gerek M, Yetiser S (2006) Surgical approaches for nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: comparative analysis and current trends. J Craniofac Surg 17:15–20
Treuner J, Niethammer D, Dannecker G, Hagmann R, Neef V, Hofschneider PH (1980) Successful treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with interferon. Lancet 12:817–818
Tyagi I, Syal R, Goyal A (2007) Recurrent and residual juvenile angiofibromas. J Laryngol Otol 121:460–467
Ulger S, Ulger Z, Yildiz F, Ozyar E (2007) Incidence of hypothyroidism after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Med Oncol 24(1):91–94
Wagner HJ, Mertens R, Reiter A, Gauch C (2009) Molecular and serological monitoring of pediatric patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by the protocol NPC-2003-GPOH of the German Society for Pediatric Oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer 53:751
Wee J, Tan EH, Tai BC, Wong HB, Leong SS, Tan T et al (2005) Randomized trial of radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer stage III and IV nasopharyngeal cancer of the endemic variety. J Clin Oncol 23(27):6730–6738
Wei W, St Sham J (2005) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 365:2041–2054
Weprin LS, Siemers PT (1991) Spontaneous regression of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:796–799
Widesott L, Pierelli A, Fiorino C, Dell’oca I, Broggi S, Cattaneo GM, Di Muzio N, Fazio F, Calandrino R, Schwarz M et al (2008) Intensity-modulated proton therapy versus helical tomotherapy in nasopharynx cancer: planning comparison and NTCP evaluation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(2):589–596
Withers HR, Thames HD (1988) Dose fractionation and volume effects in normal tissues and tumors. Am J Clin Oncol 11(3):313–329
Wolden SL, Chen WC, Pfister DG, Kraus DH, Berry SL, Zelefsky MJ (2006) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharynx cancer: update of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64(1):57–62
Wu VW, Kwong DL, Sham JS (2004) Target dose conformity in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 71(2):201–206
Xie P, Yue JB, Fu Z, Feng R, Yu JM (2010) Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT before and after radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Oncol 21:1078–1082
Yan Z, Xia L, Huang Y et al (2013) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adolescents in an endemic area: a report of 185 cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77:1454–1460
Yao JJ, Lin L, Jin YN, Wang SY, Zhang WJ, Zhang F, Zhou GQ, Cheng ZB, Qi ZY, Sun Y (2017) Prognostic value of serum Epstein-Barr virus antibodies in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and undetectable pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA. Cancer Sci 108(8):1640–1647
Yiotakis I, Eleftheriadou A, Davilis D, Giotakis E, Ferekidou E, Korres S, Kandiloros D (2008) Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma stages I and II: a comparative study of surgical approaches. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:793–800
Zaghloul MS, Eldebawy E, Ahmed S, Ammar H, Khalil E, Abdelrahman H, Zekri W, Elzomor H, Taha H, Elnashar A (2016) Does primary tumor volume predict the outcome of pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma ? A prospective single-arm study using neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy with intensity modulated radiotherapy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 12:143–150
Zhang PJ, Weber R, Liang HH, Pasha TL, LiVolsi VA (2003) Growth factors and receptors in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma and nasal polyps: an immunohistochemical study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127:1480–1484
Zhang W, Chen Y, Chen L, Guo R, Zhou G, Tang L, Mao Y, Li W, Liu X, Du X, Sun Y, Ma J (2015) The clinical utility of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA assays in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the dawn of a new era ? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 7836 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(20):e845
Zhang L, Huang Y, Hong S, Yang Y, Yu G, Jia J, Peng P, Wu X, Lin Q, Xi X, Peng J, Xu M, Chen D, Lu X, Wang R, Cao X, Chen X, Lin Z, Xiong J, Lin Q, Xie C, Li Z, Pan J, Li J, Wu S, Lian Y, Yang Q, Zhao C (2016) Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 388(10054):1883–1892
Zubarreta P, D’Antonio G, Gallo G et al (2000) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in childhood and adolescence: a single-institution experience with combined therapy. Cancer 89:690–695
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kontny, U., Rodriguez-Galindo, C., Orbach, D., Casanova, M. (2022). Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. In: Schneider, D.T., Brecht, I.B., Olson, T.A., Ferrari, A. (eds) Rare Tumors in Children and Adolescents. Pediatric Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92071-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92071-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92070-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92071-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)