Abstract
Marine biomass production known as blue carbon sequestration now received global attention as 50% greenhouse gas (CO2) sinks into ocean. Most of the marine macroalgae (seaweeds) growing along the tidal, intertidal and subtidal regions of the coastal waters are edible and also used as a source for industrially important hydrocolloids (agar, carrageenan, and alginate), pigments and secondary metabolites used in food, pharmaceutical, cosmetics and allied industries. Gracilaria sps. belong to marine red algae have gained much attraction due to its ‘agar’ content and the major share of agar production as this polysaccharide has more demand in various food and pharmaceuticals industries. The increased utilization of agar increased the harvest from the natural stock that eventually led to a decrease in the biomass resource availability as well as species extinction. So considering the agar biomass demand several methods being practiced for cultivating the Gracilaria throughout the world are compiled. This mitigates global warming by blue carbon conversion. In this review, various methods of seaweed farming by focusing Gracilaria, different cultivation methods and practices and the potential role of associated bacteria for improving the algal growth are presented for wider access and dissemination.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The importance of ocean as a source of protein is well known. Since the ocean covers ¾th of the earth surface and 2 to 3 times more productive than landmasses it gained much attraction recent years. Recently the fishing activity is increased largely all over the world (Raghu Prasad 1964). Together with this, the utilization of algae as a source of food and as a source of other secondary metabolites has also increased tremendously. Long-years back countries like China, Japan, and South Korea used algae as food. But now a days many other countries involved in the cultivation and utilization of algae when the researches showed their benefits to mankind.
One of the most important problems faced by our generation is global warming and climate change. Global warming is the term used to describe a gradual increase in the average temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere and its oceans. According to the scientific consensus on climatic changes, the average temperature of the Earth has risen between 0.4 and 0.8 °C over the past 100 years (https://www.livescience.com/topics/global-warming). Research has shown that the carbon dioxide (CO2) released into the atmosphere has increased significantly since the beginning of the industrial era (https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/institute). The increased volumes of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases released by the burning of fossil fuels, land clearing, agriculture, and other human activities, are believed to be the main sources of the global warming (https://www.livescience.com/topics/global-warming).
Carbon sequestration is the process of capturing atmospheric carbon and depositing it in reservoirs, a process to mitigate global warming and climate change (Dhanwantri et al. 2014). Various reports suggested that harvested seaweeds can be processed as biofuel feedstock which shall offer additional carbon sequestration potential (Zacharia et al. 2015; Mohammad et al. 2019; Hessami et al. 2019). They also suggested the conversion of the large seaweed biomass into biological charcoal known as biochar through pyrolysis which has agricultural applications (Zacharia et al. 2015).
Haoyang (2018) suggested that algae cultivation would reduce the greenhouse effect in the atmosphere. Algae can absorb carbon dioxide. Carbon, together with the remnants of algae, would be stored in deep oceans, on the seafloor, for several centuries. Since the algae have high metabolism rates and can also provide shellfish with abundant food that contains carbon. Shellfish’s shells, which are difficult to be decomposed, are reliable storage of carbon, compared to dead organisms like trees and algae. They suggest that since the algae are fast-growing species, the effort we would need to spend to cultivate them is very little (Haoyang 2018).
Recently the bacteria associated with algae have gained much attraction due to their ability to produce a variety of secondary metabolites. Studies have also shown that these bacteria help in enhancing the growth of algae. Apart from these they also protect the algae from other pathogens and heavy metals.
Gracilaria is a group of warm water seaweeds with a great range of temperature and latitudinal tolerance. Some species were used as food (Shama et al. 2019) and as binding material in the preparation of lime for painting walls in China. On the discovery of agar content, its use is expanded to several Asiatic countries. From then diversity of cultivation methods have been developed in other different places (FAO 2014–2021).
With all these backgrounds, this review focuses on the different methods of cultivating the red macroalgae Gracilaria species, the significance of bacterial role in growth promotion and the importance of improving cultivation to gain multiple benefits including blue carbon sequestration.
2 Gracilaria Stock for Agar Production
According to the statistics reported by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO 2014–2021), there is about 2,257,919 tonnes of Gracilaria were reported by the year 2011. About 94.2 percent (some 697,240 tonnes) is produced by the cultivation while the remaining (42,224 tonnes) are gathered from wild stocks. The reports also indicate that the most productive countries in America are Chile, Peru and Argentina. In Asia, there is productive cultivation in Indonesia,Vietnam, the Philippines, and Korea while in Africa only Namibia reports Gracilaria production (FAO 2014–2021).
According to the FAO (2014), Gracilaria is one of the world’s most cultivated seaweeds with over 0.8 million tons of annual production and nearly $160 million annual values (Kim et al. 2014). According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2017), it is the world’s most cultivated seaweeds with over 3.8 million tons of annual production and worth annually about US $1 billion (Kim et al. 2017). Most of the biomass of Gracilaria is used in the phycocolloid industry as the main source of food-grade agar (Pereira and Yarish 2008; Kim et al. 2017) and as an animal feed (Johnson et al. 2014; Kim et al. 2017; Shama et al. 2019). Gracilaria contributes about 66% of the total agar production (Pereira and Yarish 2008; Kim et al. 2017).
It is expected that the Asia Pacific is the largest producer of agar due to the easily available raw material – the red algal species in eastern and southwestern Asian countries. North America is expected to be the second-largest one. It is widely used in the food consumed by the North American population, which plays a crucial role in increasing the overall demand in the region (http://www.algaeindustrymagazine.com/new-report-explores-agar-market/).
Global agar production increased from 7500 to 9600 tonnes, with sale prices of USD 17/kg in 1999, increasing to USD 18/kg in 2009. The world agar sale value increased from USD 128 million in 1999 to USD173 million in 2009. In 1999, about 63 percent of the total agar production was produced by Gracilaria which have been increased to 80 percent in 2009 (FAO 2014–2021). Among the seaweed cultivation around the world, the genus Gracilaria ranked highest with over 3.8 million tons of annual production. It contributes about 91% of total agar production (Kavale et al. 2018).
In 2016, Agar for Food Industry occupied more than 57% of the total production of agar world wide. Since the agar is widely used in Food Industry, Pharmaceutic, Cosmetics, Daily Chemical, and Scientific Research, the demand for agar is expected to increase during the remaining years of the forecast period of 2017–2022. The global Agar market is valued at 280 million US$ in 2017. With a growth at a CAGR of 4.0% during 2018–2025, it is expected to reach 380 million US$ by the end of 2025 (http://www.abnewswire.com/pressreleases/global-agar-market-2018-industry-key-players-trends-sales-supply-demand-analysis-forecast-to-2025_234917.html).
There is a high pressure on wild populations of Gracilaria because of the high harvesting of wild Gracilaria crops and an increase in demand for agarophytes (Guanzon and de Castro 1992; Wilson and Critchley 1997). To reduce the over-exploitation of wild crops and to meet the ever-increasing demands for agarophytes and their products, there have been rapid developments in Gracilaria mariculture during recent years (Hansen et al. 1981; Wilson and Critchley 1997).
However, information about the influence of environmental parameters such as temperature, irradiance, salinity, and nutrients on the growth of the alga is required to evaluate commercial utilization of Gracilaria spp., (Rebello et al. 1996; Wilson and Critchley 1997).
3 Agar Yielding Potential Red Algal Species
The genus Gracilaria belongs to the class Rhodophyceae (Red algae). Most of them are marine species except a few ones. They are having well-developed branched thalli and multicelluar form. They vary in size and shape. They grow in crust on the rocks or shells as a large fleshy, branched, or blade like thalli. The thallus is basically filamentous. It may be simple or branched, free or compacted, and thus forming pseudoparenchyma with uni or multi axial construction (Fig. 28.1). They occupy intertidal to subtidal zones of coastal areas (Jones 1959; Kolanjinathan and Stella 2011).
Members of Gracilaria are among the most economically important seaweeds because of their ability to achieve high yields and to produce commercially valuable extracts (Cynthia et al. 2011). They are having a variety of uses, ranging from traditional foods and medicines to biological and industrial applications (Gressler et al. 2010; Kim et al. 2017). They are important for the industrial and biotechnological uses because of the presence of phycocolloids in their cellwalls mainly the agar (Cynthia et al. 2011).
The important and commonly occurring agar yielding seaweeds in different localities of Indian coast are species of Gelidiella, Gracilaria, Gelidium and Pterocladia. Among these red algae, only Gelidiella acerosa, Gracilaria edulis, G. corticota var. corticata G. foliifera and G. verrucosa are available in exploitable quantities (Kaliaperumal and Kalimuthu 1997).
There are three quality grade agars are produced namely, sugar reactive agar, standard agar and food-grade agar. In the sugar reactive agar, the gels are stronger as a function of sugar concentration. It is obtained largely from Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis, the most important species under cultivation in China at present (FAO 2014–2021). In the standard agar the gel has the temperature, consistency and structure for microbiological purposes. It is produced largely by Gelidium, Pterocladia or Pterocladiella. Any kinds of agar that are not meeting the requirements for sugar-reactive or bacteriological agar are designated as the food-grade agar. It is extracted from a wide variety of Gracilaria species (FAO 2014–2021).
4 Methods of Cultivation
Gracilaria species are mainly cultivated using vegetative fragments. For its cultivation, sustainable seedstock is very important. Seedstock has been supplied from the wild; either the healthy branches of Gracilaria from natural stock were collected or reproductive plants were selected to collect spores (either carpospores or tetraspores) for seeding (Buschmann et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2017).
The tropical species of agarophytic seaweeds can be obtained either from gathering natural stocks which is greatly influenced by seasonal changes in the weather (monsoons) or from farming or culturing of these species which is more predictable and stable, and targeted outputs are easily attained (Gavino 1989).
According to some reports,Gracilaria cultivation is done mainly in three different ways, including open water, pond, or tank cultures (Pereira and Yarish 2008; Kim et al. 2014). But some other reports say that it is being cultivated in four ways including open water rope cultivation, nearshore bottom cultivation, pond culture, and tank cultures (Kim et al. 2017). Though there are many more methods are practiced for the cultivation.
Open water cultivation is practiced in estuaries, bays, and upwelling areas. A nursery (tank culture) system provides sufficient seedstock (Pereira and Yarish 2008).
In the pond culture of Gracilaria, the water is introduced into the pond that is dried for several days. Seaweed cuttings are directly staked onto the bottom (Castanos and Buendia 1998).The non-intensive ponds are usually made of an uncovered earthen construction and are lack an artificial water agitation system, while the intensive cultivation ponds are made of a concrete or plastic structure with a water agitation system (Friedlander and Levy 1995).
Tank cultivation has the advantage in its simplicity of controlling the culture system (Pereira et al. 2013). This ensures that production meets high quality standards and biosafety for human consumptions, as well as for other high-value applications such as cosmetics or pharmaceutical products.
In the rope cultivation either vegetative materials are tied or inserted within a rope or spores are left to settle on the surface of the ropes. The ropes or lines used here can be monofilament, nylon or other suitable lines. Suspended rope culture is a relatively simple fixed grow-out system (Yarish et al. 2012). Seeded ropes are suspended, stretched between stakes buried in the sediment, or supported at different levels by buoys or rafts (FAO 2014–2021).
In near shore bottom cultivation , fronds are either ‘seeded’ onto rocks and spread on the bottom in a shallow area, or attached to lines that are strung on stakes and suspended just above the bottom (Chen 1989). Here the spore collection and farm sites are usually the same (Veeragurunathan et al. 2015).
In the floating culture method , seaweed stocks are inserted in seedling rope made up of palm thread or artificial fiber which isthen fixed to a floating raft (Chen 1989).
In tube- net method, tube-net modules (polypropylene commercial fishnet) are used (Pereira and Yarish 2008). After seeding directly lengthwise into the tube they are tied to floating bamboo raft (Ganesan et al. 2017; Mantri et al. 2017).
In the net bag method , about 200–300-g seedlings are seeded onto a 75-cm-long bag prepared from commercial fishnet which is covered with agro net. Then the bag is tied onto an 8-mm polypropylene rope. The rope is then tied on both sides to the vertically erected bamboo poles (Ganesan et al. 2017).
In net pouch method, net pouch is made with a 3-m-long tube. The bag is then made in to five equal compartments by a hand stitch up to the nylon thread in which Gracilaria fragments are seeded (Ganesan et al. 2017).
5 Bacterial Association in the Algal Growth
Microorganisms are found everywhere, in all ecosystems around the globe. They can survive even in extreme conditions. It is suggested that at least ten million microbial species remaining unidentified in nature. Only less than 1% of all bacterial species and less than 5% of all fungi species are described (Berdy 2012). Goecke and his colleagues mentioned that seawater containsup to 107 viruses, 106 bacteria, 103 fungi per ml (Goecke et al. 2010). Macroalgae are highly susceptible to epibiosis. Because of the rich content of organic material, a number of bacterial species get associated with macroalgae (Goecke et al. 2010).
Previous studies reported that the number of seaweed-associated bacteria is 100–10,000 times more than those from the surrounding seawater (Chan and McManus 1969; Weinberger et al. 1994). Sutha et al. (2011) enumerated 15 bacterial isolates from six seaweeds (Gracilaria edulis, Hypnea valentiae, Acanthophora spicifera, Enteromorpha intestinalis, E. flexuosa, Ulva lactuca) and identified the presence of Bacillus licheniformis, B. subtilis, B. pumilus, B.marinus, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptomyces coelicolar (Sutha et al. 2011).
Seaweed associated bacteria so far isolated belong to the (super) phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes (CFB group), Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi, Deinococcus-Thermus, Fusobacteria, Tenericutes, and the candidate division OP11 (Hollants et al. 2012).
In the review of Hollants and collegues (2012), they mentioned that, in all studies reviewed, the most common bacterial clade associated with seaweeds were Gammaproteobacteria with 37% relative abundance (percentage of published records), followed by the CFB group (20%), Alphaproteobacteria (13%), Firmicutes (10%), and Actinobacteria (9%). On a lower taxonomic level, the orders Flavobacteriales (14%), Alteromonadales (12%), Vibrionales (10%), Pseudomonadales (9%), Bacillales (9%), Actinomycetales (8%), and Rhodobacterales (7%) were most abundant in seaweed-associated bacterial communities (Hollants et al. 2012).
Suvega and Arunkumar (2014), isolated 673 bacteria from different algae Caulerpa scalpelliformis, Ulva lactuca, U. fasciata, Chaetomorpha linum, Gracilaria edulis, G.corticata var. corticata, Hypnea valentiae, Grateloupia filicina, Kappaphycus alvarezii and Sargassum wightii as well as from sediments and seawater. They reported the presence of 26 bacterial genera with with species of Bacillus recording a maximum of 40.2%. They indicated that bacterial populations were considerably higher in seaweeds as compared to seawater and sediments (Suvega and Arunkumar 2014).
Algal–Bacterial Interactions
Marine algae and bacteria have come a long way since algal plastids originated from Endosymbiotic Cyanobacteria (Margulis and Schwartz 1998; Ramanan et al. 2016). They developed a diversified bacterial association like beneficial (mutualistic), harmful (parasitic), neutral (commensal), etc. Bacteria either live on the surface (epiphytes) or in the cytoplasm and/or vacuolar systems of the cells (endophytes) (Hollants et al. 2012; Friedrich 2012).
Beneficial Bacterial–Macroalgal Interactions
Seaweed-associated bacteria gained a lot of importance because of theirability to produce a variety of secondary metabolites. A large number of endophytic, epiphytic and epibiotic bacteria are associated with macroalgae, which constantly interact with their host positively or negatively.
Studies by Sturz et al. (2000) have shown that bacterial isolates can contribute to the growth, health, and development of seaweeds by the direct production of the plant growth regulators and nitrogen fixation (Sturz et al. 2000). These plant growth regulators have been reported to play an important role in the morphogenesis of callus from Rhodophyta members (Yokoya 2000; Reddy et al. 2003).
Bacterial effects on morphogenesis have been reported in foliaceous green macroalgae such as Ulva and Monostroma. It has been reported that this morphogenesis controlled by bacteria belonging to the genera Cytophaga, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Vibrio, Bacillus, and Flavobacterium (Marshall et al. 2006; Singh et al. 2011a).
The plant growth-promoting nature of bacteria associated with Laminaria japonica was reported by Dimitrieva et al. (2006). In addition to these, studies showed that microorganisms play a role in the protection of macroalga against toxic heavy metals (Goecke et al. 2010) or crude oil (Goecke et al. 2010). Microorganisms are able to detoxify, for example, heavy metals by precipitation, adsorption, or transformation to fewer toxic forms (Yurkov and Beatty 1998; Goecke et al. 2010).
Bacteria produce morphogenic factors, fixed nitrogen, enzymes, and vitamins which promote algal growth. Morphogenesis is controlled by a highly potent differentiation inducer, thallusin, isolated from well-defined associated bacteria (Hollants et al. 2012).
Seaweed-associated bacteria were isolated and studied for their morphogenesis capability in axenic cultures of the green alga Ulva fasciata (Singh et al. 2011a). This was the first study providing evidence of the effect of bacterial isolates on zoospore induction. Later the role of bacterial isolates in enhancing the bud induction in the industrially important red alga Gracilaria dura was studied. The findings revealed for the first time that IAA coupled with nitrogen fixation induces and regenerates new buds in G. Dura (Singh et al. 2011b). They suggested that bud-inducing bacterial isolates are important for nitrogen supply to the G. dura. These associated nitrogen-fixing bacteria will fix atmospheric nitrogen and supply nitrogen supplement sources.
Studies by Weinberger et al. (2007) on Acrochaetium sp., showed that the spore release is controlled by bacteria. He reported that suppression of bacterial epiphytes with antibiotics prevented spore release of Acrochaetium sp. completely, that demonstrated that this alga strongly depends on bacterial AHL. They suggested that the life cycle completion in Acrochaetium sp. strongly depends on bacteria (Weinberger et al. 2007).
The studies done by Shin (2008) showed that enhanced settlement of spores on mixed microbial biofilm of Ulva fasciata (Shin 2008). The studies done by Imchen (2012) on the influence of biofilms on the zoospore settlement of Enteromorpha flexousa showed that the biofilms provide a favorable substratum for settlement (Imchen 2012).
Studies to evaluate the effect of quorum sensing (QS) molecules produced by the epiphytic and endophytic bacteria associated with green macroalgae Ulva (U.fasciata and U.lactuca) and red macroalgae Gracilaria (G.corticata and G.dura) on the carpospores liberation from G.dura has shown that carpospore liberation is positively induced by the isolated bacteria (Singh et al. 2015). Studies also demonstrated that some Gram-negative epiphytic and endophytic seaweed-associated bacteria produce different types of AHLs. They reported that these bacterial isolates can effectively be used for mass carpospore liberation.
These studies show the significance of associated bacteria in the growth of macro algae. It is obvious that there are bacteria that contribute to bud induction, spore release, spore settlement, morphogenesis, nitrogen fixation, etc. Thus, isolation and identification of such bacteria and their mechanism of interaction will be very helpful for improving the cultural practices of Gracilaria and other algae.
6 Potential of Gracilaria Mariculture in India
Within the red macroalgae, the genus Gracilaria, represented by more than 100 species (Oliveira and Plastino 1994) living in warm water areas (Steentoft and Farham 1997), is notable for its economic importance as a source of agar. Culturing of seaweeds in Indian coastal waters started with cultivation of Gracilaria edulis due to its high regenerative capacity (Zacharia et al. 2015). Currently, 185 Gracilaria species are taxonomically accepted (Guiry and Guiry 2016).
The surveys carried out by CSMCRI, CMFRI and other research organizations have revealed vast seaweed resources along the coastal belts of South India. On the West Coast, especially in the state of Gujarat, abundant seaweed resources are present on the intertidal and sub tidal regions (Govt. of Gujarath 2017). These resources have great potential for the development of seaweed-based industries in India.
There are about 25 agar and alginate industries situated in states of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala Pondicherry, Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat. Among these, more than 20 industries produce food grade agar by using Gracilaria edulis (Kaliaperumal et al. 2004; Kaliaperumal and Ramalingam 2005).
Thirty-one species of Gracilaria are found on the Indian coastline of the Bay of Bengal. The estimated biomass of Gracilaria from Indian waters is 1700 tonnes (Krishnamurthy 1989). India produces 110–132 tons of dry agar annually utilizing about 880–1100 tons of dry agarophytes (Govt. of Gujarath 2017).
Central Salt and Marine Chemical Research Institute (CSMCRI), Marine Algal Research Station (MARS), Mandapam, Tamil Nadu a CSIR Institute developed viable and commercially sustainable methods for cultivating Gracilaria edulis. CSMCRI developed single Rope Floating Raft (SRFR) method which is suitable for culturing seaweeds in wide area and greater depth (Kaliaperumal and Kalimuthu 1997; Gulshad 2016).
Floating raft technology has been recommended to be used on the coasts of Kerala for agarophytic algal cultivation. Certain areas in the Gulf of Kutch have been suggested as suitable for deep-water seaweed cultivation. CMFRI has developed techniques for culturing Gelidiella acerosa, Gracilaria edulis, Hypnea musciformis and Acanthophora spicifera, and to find improved techniques for propagation and large-scale culture of other economically important seaweeds, attempts are being made (Gulshad 2016; Govt. of Gujarat 2017).
In different localities of Indian coast, Gracilaria edulis, G. corticola var. corticata, G. foliifera and G.verrucosa are available in exploitable abundant quantities. G.arcuala and G. verrucosa occur in harvestable quantities in some estuaries and backwaters of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry (Kaliaperumal and Kalimuthu 1997). A 17-fold increase in yield of G. edulis was obtained in 76 days in the first harvest at Minicoy Lagoon, Minicoy Island, of Lakshadweep, India during south west monsoon season by adopting single bottom coir rope method (Krishnamurthy 1989; Kaliaperumal and Kalimuthu 1997).
Single bottom coir rope method and single bottom nylon rope method are best method for culture during the southwest monsoon season at Islands of U.T. of Lakshadweep. This is cost effective seaweed farming technology and practiced by fisherman of Lakshadweep to generate income during lean fishing season of southwest monsoon (May to September) because this time site becomes enriched with nutrients, which help to get good growth of seaweeds (Kaliaperumal and Kalimuthu 1997; Gulshad 2016).
According to the project done by Government of Gujarat (2017), India can grow more than one million tonnes of seaweeds in six states-Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Andaman & Nicobar Islands. In the global markets each tons of average quality agar-agar is sold for more than US$2000 (INR120,000) and the country has the potential to generate more than INR200 crore in foreign exchange annually apart from providing additional income and gainful employment to thousands of people on the coastline (Govt. of Gujarat 2017; Krishnamurthy 1989). This shows the importance of Gracilaria culturing in India.
7 Conclusions and Future Perspectives
The increasing population pressure and energy needs have resulted in issues related to global warming. To avoid the dangerous after-effects of this, there is need for ecofriendly solution. It also demands multi-pronged approaches. One of them being seaweed farming to achieve sustainable climate resilient strategy with multiple benefits as means of carbon sequestration and mitigation of ocean acidification, also as feedstock for bioenergy production with an underpinning of economic gains for the dependent populations. The red macro algae Gracilaria are economically very important seaweeds for their agar yielding properties and other biotechnological and industrial applications. A number of cultivation techniques are being developed for the Gracilaria as a sustainable alternative to natural stock which is already over expoloited. Knowledge on the life cycle and environmental factors that affect growth of Gracilaria will help to improve the techniques for cultivation. One of the ways to improve the algal growth is isolating and identifying growth promoting seaweed associated bacteria. The recent studies showed that the seaweed associated bacteria help in improving the growth of algae thus improving the biomass productivity. When compared to other countries, India is still improving methodologies for cultivation of Gracilaria. However, India, which has a large coastline area, has a high possibility for developing cultivation techniques and improving algae-based industries. It will offer jobs for millions of people and provide a large income to the nation. It will also address the issues of global warming and facilitate a move towards carbon-neutral economy.
References
Berdy J (2012) Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: where we are now and wherewe are heading. J Antibiot 65:385–395
Buschmann AH, Varela DA, Hernández-González MC, Huovinen P (2008) Opportunities and challenges for the development of an integrated seaweed-based aqua culture activity in Chile: determining the physiological capabilities of MacrocystisandGracilariaas biofilters. J Appl Phycol 20:571–577
Castanos M, Buendia R (1998) Farming techniques for seaweeds. SEAFDEC Asian. Aquaculture XX No. 1:14–25
Chan ECS, McManus EA (1969) Distribution, characterization, and nutrition of marine microorganisms from the algae Polysiphonia lanosa and Ascophyllum nodosum. Can J Microbiol 15:409–420
Chen JX (1989) Gracilaria culture in China. 18 pp. NACA-SF/WP/89/13. Sea farming project, RAS/86/024. Gracilaria production and utilization in the bay of Bengal. BOBP/REP/45
Cynthia Layse F, Almeida D, De Heloina S, FalcãoGedson R, Lima DM, Montenegro CDA, Lira NS, De Athayde-Filho PF, Rodrigues LC, De Souza MDFV, Barbosa-Filho JM, Batista LM (2011) Bioactivities from marine algae of the genus Gracilaria. Int J Mol Sci 12:4550–4573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12074550
Dhanwantri K, Sharma P, Mehta S, Prakash P (2014) Carbon sequestration, its methods and significance, environmental sustainability: concepts. Principles, Evidences and Innovations. ISBN: 978–93–83083-75-6
Dimitrieva GY, Crawford RL, Yuksel GU (2006) The nature of plant growth-promoting effect of a pseudomonad associated with the marine algae Laminaria japonica and linked tocatalase extraction. J ApplMicrobiol 100:1159–1169
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2014–2021) Cultured aquatic species information programme. Gracilaria spp. Cultured aquatic species information programme. Text by Santelices, B. In: FAO Fisheries Division [online]
Friedlander M, Levy I (1995) Cultivation of Gracilaria in outdoor tanks and ponds. J Appl Phycol 7:315–324
Friedrich MW (2012) Bacterial communities on macroalgae. In: Seaweed biology. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 189–201
Ganesan M, Eswaran K, Reddy CK (2017) Farming of agarophytes in India—a long-time sustainability for the industry and preserving wild stocks. J Appl Phycol 2017(29):2239–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1128-0
Gavino C, Trono Jr (1989) Present status of Gracilaria culture. pp. 5–12. Gracilaria production and utilization in the Bay of Bengal. BOBP/REP/45
Goecke F, Labes A, Wiese J, Imhoff JF (2010) Chemical interactions between marine macroalgae and bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 409:267–299. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08607
Govt. of Gujarath (2017) Development of seaweed culture. Agro and Food Processing https://gaic.gujarat.gov.in/writereaddata/images/pdf/26-Seaweed-Culture
Gressler V, Yokoya NS, Fujii MT, Colepicolo P, Filho JM, Torres RP, Pinto E (2010) Lipid, fatty acid, protein, amino acid and ash contents in four Brazilian red algae species. Food Chem 120:585–590
Guanzon NGJ, De Castro T (1992) The eftects of different stocking densities and some abiotic factors on cage culture of Gracilariasp. (Rhodophyta. Gigartinales). Bot Mar 35:239–243
Guiry MD, Guiry GM (2016) AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. Available from: http://www.algaebase.org. Accessed June 21, 2016
Gulshad M (2016) Current trends and prospects of seaweed farming in India. In: Joseph I, Boby I (eds) Winter school on technological advances in mariculture for production enhancement and sustainability. Course Manual, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, pp 78–84
Hansen JE, Packard JE, Doyle WT (1981) Mariculture of red seaweeds. Cited in: Haoyang C (2018) Algae-based carbon sequestration, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 120, 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/120/1/012011
Haoyang C (2018) Algae-Based Carbon Sequestration. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 120 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/120/1/012011
Hessami MJ, Cheng SF, Ranga Rao A, Yin YH, Phang SM (2019) Bioethanol production from agarophyte red seaweed, Gelidium elegans using a novel sample preparation method for analysing bioethanol content by gas chromatography. Biotech J 9(1):25
Hollants J, Leliaert F, De Clerck O, Willems A (2012) What we can learn from sushi: a review on seaweed– bacterial associations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 83:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01446x
http://www.algaeindustrymagazine.com/new-report-explores-agar-market/
Imchen T (2012) Effect of temperature, salinity and biofilm on the zoospores settlement of Enteromorphaflexuosa (Wulfen) J. Agardh. Indian J Geo- Marine Sci 41(4):355–358
Johnson RB, Kim JK, Armbruster LC, Yarish C (2014) Nitrogen allocation of Gracilariatikvahiaegrown in urbanized estuaries of Long Island sound and new York City, USA: a preliminary evaluation of ocean farmed Gracilariafor alternative fish feeds. Algae 29:227–235
Jones WE (1959) The growth and fruiting of Gracilariaverrucosa(Hudson) Papenfuss. J Mar boil Ass 38:47–56
Kaliaperumal N, Kalimuthu S (1997) Seaweed potential and its exploitation in India. Seaweed Res Utiln 19(1 & 2):33–40
Kaliaperumal N, Kalimuthu S, Ramalingam JR (2004) Present scenario of seaweed exploitation and industry in India. Seaweed Res Utilization 27(1 & 2) (in press)
Kaliaperumal N, Ramalingam JR (2005) Effect of different fertilizers on the growth of Gracilariaedulis?(Gmelin) silva in onshore cultivation. Indian Hydrobiologia 7:63–67
Kavale MG, Veeragurunathan V, Mantri VA (2018) Handbook on farming of Gracilaria dura. Govt. of India, National Fisheries Development Board. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327418918
Kim JK, Kraemer GP, Yarish C (2014) Field scale evaluation of seaweed aquaculture as a nutrient bioextraction strategy in Long Island sound and the Bronx River estuary. Aquaculture 433:148–156
Kim JK, Yarish C, Hwang EK, Park M, Kim Y (2017) Seaweed aquaculture: cultivation technologies, challenges and its ecosystem services. Algae 32(1):1–13
Kolanjinathan K, Stella D (2011) Pharmacological effect of Gracilaria corticata solvent extracts against human pathogenic bacteria and fungi. I. J Pharmaceutic Biol Arch 2(6):1722–1728
Krishnamurthy V (1989) Gracilaria resources of India with particular reference to the bay of Bengal. Gracilaria production and utilization in the Bay of Bengal, BOBP/REP/45, pp 97–98
Mantri VA, Ashok KS, Musamil TM, Gobalakrishnan M, Saminathan KR, Behera DP, Veeragurunathan V, Eswaran K, Thiruppathi S, Pothal JK, Ghosh PK (2017) Tube-net farming and device for efficient tissue segregation for industrially important agarophyteGracilariaedulis (Rhodophyta). Aquac Eng 77(2017):132–135
Margulis L, Schwartz KV (1998) Five kingdoms: an illustrated guide to the phyla of life on earth, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York, NY, USA. ISBN 0-7167-3027-8. xx, p 520
Marshall K, Joint I, Callow ME, Callow JA (2006) Effect of marine bacterial isolates on the growth and morphology of axenic plantlets of the green alga Ulvalinza. MicrobEcol 52:302–310
Mohammad JH, Ranga Rao A, Ravishankar GA (2019) Opportunities and challenges in seaweeds as feed stock for biofuel production. In: Ravishankar GA, Rao AR (eds) Handbook of algal technologies and phytochemicals: volume-II Phycoremediation, biofuels and global biomass production. CRC Press, USA, pp 39–50
Oliveira EC, Plastino EM (1994) Gracilariaceae. In: Akatsuka I (ed) Biology of economic algae. SSB Academic, The Hague, pp 185–226
Pereira R, Yarish C (2008) Mass production of marine macroalgae. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (eds) Encyclopedia of ecology. Ecological engineering, vol 3. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 2236–2247
Pereira R, Yarish C, Critchley AT (2013) Seaweed aquaculture for human foods in land based and IMTA systems. In: Meyers RA (ed) Encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. Springer, New York, pp 9109–9128
Raghu Prasad R (1964) Study of primary production and its importance in an integra ted fisheries research programme. Fishery Technology I(I)
Ramanan R, Kim BH, Cho DH, Oh HM, Kim HS (2016) Algae–bacteria interactions: evolution, ecology and emerging applications. Biotechnol Adv 34:14–12
Rebello J, Ohno M, Critchley AT, Sawamura M (1996) Growth rates and agar quality of Gracilariagracilis(stack house) Steentoft from Namibia, southern Africa. Bot Mar 39:273–279
Reddy CRK, Kumar GRK, Siddhanta AK, Tewari A (2003) Invitro somatic embryogenesis and regeneration of somatic embryos from pigmented callus of Kappaphycus alvarezii(DOTY) DOTY (Rhodophyta, Gigartinales). J Phycol 39:610–616
Shama A, Joyce SG, Mari FD, Ranga Rao A, Ravishankar GA, Hudaa N (2019) Macroalgae and microalgae: novel sources of functional food and feed. In: Ravishankar GA, Rao AR (eds) Handbook of algal technologies and phytochemicals, volume-I: food, health and nutraceutical applications. CRC Press, USA, pp 207–219
Shin HW (2008) Rapid attachment of spores of the fouling alga Ulva fasciata on biofilms. J Environ Biol 29:613–619
Singh RP, Baghel RS, Reddy CRK, Jha B (2015) Effect of quorum sensing signals produced by seaweed associated bacteria on carpospores liberation from Gracilaria dura. FrontiersinPlantScience, Plant- Microbe Interaction 6:117
Singh RP, Bijo AJ, Baghel RS, Reddy CRK, Jha B (2011b) Role of bacterial isolates in enhancing the bud induction in the industrially important red alga Gracilaria dura. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 76:381–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01057.x
Singh RP, Mantri VA, Reddy CRK, Jha B (2011a) Isolation of seaweed-associated bacteria and their morphogenesis-inducing capability in axenic cultures of the green alga Ulva fasciata. Aquat Biol 12:13–21. https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00312
Steentoft M, Farham WF (1997) Northern distribution boundaries and thermal requirements of Gracilaria and Gracilariopsis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) in Atlantic Europe and Scandinavia. Nord J Bot 5:87–93
Sturz AV, Christie BR, Nowak J (2000) Bacterial endophytes:potential role in developing sustainable systems of cropproduction. Crit Rev Plant Sci 19:1–30
Sutha SP, Venkatesan M, Arunkumar K (2011) Endobiotic bacteria in some seaweeds of Thondi coastal region in Palk Bay, Tamil Nadu. India J Mar Biol Ass India 53(2):251–256
Suvega T, Arunkumar K (2014) Antimicrobial activity of bacteria associated with seaweeds against plant pathogens on par with bacteria found in seawater and sediments. Br Microbiol Res J 4(8):841–855
Veeragurunathan V, Eswaran K, Malarvizhi J, Gobalakrishnan M (2015) Cultivation of Gracilaria dura in the open sea along the southeast coast of India. J Appl Phycol 27:2353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-014-0514-0
Weinberger F, Beltran J, Correa JA, Lion U, Pohnert G, Kumar N, Steinberg P, Kloareg B, Potin P (2007) Spore release in acrochaetium sp. (rhodophyta) is bacterially controlled. J Phycol 43:235–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00329.x
Weinberger F, Friedlander M, Gunkel W (1994) A bacterial facultative parasite of Gracilariaconferta. Dis Aquat Org 18:135–141
Wilson AJ, Critchley AT (1997) Studies on Gracilariagracilis(Stackhouse) Steen toft, Farnham and Irvine and Gracilariaaculeata(Hering) Papenfuss from southern Africa. I. the influence of temperature, irradiance, salinity and nitrogen-nutrition on growth. S Afr J Bot 63(6):465–471
Yarish C, Redmond S, Kim JK (2012) Gracilaria culture handbook for New England. Wrack Lines 72. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/wracklines/72
Yokoya NS (2000) Apical callus formation and plant regenerationcontrolled by plant growth regulators on axenic culture of thered alga Gracilariopsis tenuifrons (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta). Phycol Res 48:133–142
Yurkov VV, Beatty JT (1998) Aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:695–724
Zacharia PU, Kaladharan P, Rojith G (2015) Seaweed farming as a climate resilient strategy for Indian Coastal Waters. In: The international conference on integrating climate, crop, ecology - the emerging areas of agriculture, horticulture, livestock, fishery, forestry, biodiversity and policy issues, pp 59–62. ISBN:978-8-930585-9-6
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Plant Science, Central University of Kerala. India. The authors are thankful to CSIR- India, for the financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Umashree, V.R., Arunkumar, K. (2022). Gracilaria Cultivation and the Role of Its Associated Bacteria for Biomass Production. In: Ranga Rao, A., Ravishankar, G.A. (eds) Sustainable Global Resources Of Seaweeds Volume 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91955-9_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91955-9_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91954-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91955-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)