Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma is the most common skin cancer worldwide. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a specialized surgical procedure to treat and achieve complete clearance of BCCs. However, frozen sectioning performed during MMS is a time-consuming and a labor-intensive process. Ex vivo confocal microscopy (EVCM) is an attractive alternative to frozen sectioning during MMS as it can rapidly image fresh (unprocessed and un-sectioned) tissue, enabling tumor margin assessment in real-time. EVCM has shown high sensitivity and specificity for detecting BCCs. In this chapter, we have described the morphological features of common subtypes of BCC as visualized in various imaging modes on the EVCM (fluorescence confocal microscopy and digital H&E mode) and compared them with their corresponding.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Basal cell carcinoma
- Ex vivo confocal microscopy
- Histopathologic correlation
- Digital H&E
- Fluorescence confocal microscopy
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer worldwide [1]. Annually, two million new BCC cases are estimated in the USA [2], and the incidence rates are expected to rise due to aging population [3]. Exposure to UV radiation from sunlight is the primary etiologic agent for BCC, particularly among individuals with lighter skin prototypes (I to III) (Table 7.1).
Although BCCs are indolent tumors and rarely metastasis, it can be locally aggressive in nature [1] with a high destructive potential, affecting the surrounding structures including bone and vital organs (eyelids, earlobes, etc.).
Clinically, BCCs can have varied appearance based on their histopathological subtypes. Nodular BCCs (nBCC) are the most common subtypes accounting for 80% of the lesions [4]. They are primarily located on the face. Clinically, they present as shiny papules or nodules, which may have “rolled” borders and telangiectatic vessels. Superficial BCCs (sBCC) are mostly located on upper trunk and appears as slightly scaly plaques, pink to flesh-colored. Morpheaform or sclerosing BCCs are typically located in the mid-facial sites and appears as scar-like lesions with ill-distinct borders. Ulceration is a usual feature for all BCCs subtypes, and pigmentation can also be seen.
Dermoscopy is useful for the diagnosis of BCC. Several dermoscopic features of BCC have been described: large blue-grey ovoid nests, multiple blue-grey dots and globules, leaf-like areas, spoke wheel areas, concentric structures, arborizing vessels, short fine telangiectasias, shiny white and white-red structures, ulceration, multiple small erosions, and shiny white-red structureless areas [5].
On histopathology, there are various subtypes of BCCs. The most common subtypes including nBCC, sBCC, micronodular BCC, infiltrative BCC (iBCC), morpheaform or sclerosing BCCs, and infundibulocystic BCCs. nBCCs and sBCCs consist of varied sized nests of basaloid cells with peripheral palisading and clefting located in the dermis and attached to the basal layer of epidermis, respectively. Around the tumor nests, mucinous stroma can be seen. In iBCC, small irregular clusters of basaloid cells are seen in the dermis. Micronodular BCC is characterized by small basaloid nests; while, sclerosing BCC have thin strands of basaloid cells embedded within a dense sclerotic stroma.
Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a specialized surgical procedure designed to treat and achieve complete clearance of BCCs. MMS provides high cure rates [6] and allows surgeons to maximize tissue preservation while treating recurrent BCCs or BCCs located in the cosmetic sites, such as the face [7]. Frozen sections performed during MMS is a time consuming (∼20 to 40 min ∕layer removal) and a labor intensive [8] process, which is currently a major limitation of this procedure.
Ex vivo confocal microscopy (EVCM) is an attractive alternative to frozen sectioning during Mohs surgery as it can rapidly image fresh (unprocessed and un-sectioned) tissue, enabling tumor margin assessment in real-time. EVCM has shown high sensitivity and specificity for detecting BCCs in fresh Mohs surgical excisions in several studies [9,10,11,12], paving the way to a future rapid bedside histopathologic guidance for the surgeons.
In this chapter, we have described the morphological features of common subtypes of BCC as visualized in various imaging modes on the EVCM device, including fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) mode and digital H&E (DHE) mode and compared them with their corresponding H&E-stained frozen sections (Table 7.2). For image acquisition, the latest generation of EVCM device (Vivascope 2500; Caliber ID, Rochester, NY, USA) was used to image fresh discarded BCC tissues from MMS (Figs. 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.10, 7.11, 7.12, 7.13, 7.14 and 7.15).
References
Nehal KS, Bichakjian CK. Update on keratinocyte carcinomas. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:363–74. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1708701.
Asgari MM, Moffet HH, Ray GT, Quesenberry CP. Trends in basal cell carcinoma incidence and identification of high-risk subgroups, 1998–2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:976–81. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1188.
Cameron MC, Lee E, Hibler BP, Barker CA, Mori S, Cordova M, et al. Basal cell carcinoma: epidemiology; pathophysiology; clinical and histological subtypes; and disease associations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:303–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.060.
Scrivener Y, Grosshans E, Cribier B. Variations of basal cell carcinomas according to gender, age, location and histopathological subtype. Br J Dermatol. 2002;147:41–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04804.x.
Reiter O, Mimouni I, Dusza S, Halpern AC, Leshem YA, Marghoob AA. Dermoscopic features of basal cell carcinoma and its subtypes: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.11.008.
Van Loo E, Mosterd K, Krekels GAM, Roozeboom MH, Ostertag JU, Dirksen CD, et al. Surgical excision versus Mohs’ micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma of the face: a randomised clinical trial with 10 year follow-up. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:3011–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.018.
Jain M, Rajadhyaksha M, Nehal K. Implementation of fluorescence confocal mosaicking microscopy by “early adopter” Mohs surgeons and dermatologists: recent progress. J Biomed Opt. 2017;22:24002. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.2.024002.
Rajadhyaksha M, Menaker G, Flotte T, Dwyer PJ, Âlez SG. Confocal examination of nonmelanoma cancers in thick skin excisions to potentially guide Mohs micrographic surgery without frozen histopathology. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117:1137–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01524.x.
Karen JK, Gareau DS, Dusza SW, Tudisco M, Rajadhyaksha M, Nehal KS. Detection of basal cell carcinomas in Mohs excisions with fluorescence confocal mosaicing microscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160:1242–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09141.x.
Gareau DS. Feasibility of digitally stained multimodal confocal mosaics to simulate histopathology. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14:034050. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3149853.
Bennàssar A, Carrera C, Puig S, Vilalta A, Malvehy J. Fast evaluation of 69 basal cell carcinomas with ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:839. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.459.
Mu EW, Lewin JM, Stevenson ML, Meehan SA, Carucci JA, Gareau DS. Use of digitally stained multimodal confocal mosaic images to screen for nonmelanoma skin cancer. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:1335–41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.2997.
Rubin AI, Chen EH, Ratner D. Basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2262–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra044151.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sendín-Martín, M. et al. (2022). Morphological Features of Basal Cell Carcinoma on Ex Vivo Confocal Imaging and Histopathologic Correlation. In: Jain, M., Rossi, A., Nehal, K., Sendín-Martín, M. (eds) Cutaneous Atlas of Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89316-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89316-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89315-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89316-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)