Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Human Dynamics in Smart Cities ((HDSC))

  • 426 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers a critical review of research on misinformation and social networking sites (SNSs). Using keywords related to misinformation and SNSs, this review examines relevant scholarship published since 2004. Content of relevant articles is summarized in terms of examined contexts, involved disciplines (e.g., public health, communication), methodological approaches, use of theory, and solutions presently offered for addressing this important problem. Disinformation and fake news are also included in the scope of this review. Current trends in research on misinformation and SNSs will be discussed. Results of this review suggest that misinformation on SNSs represents an issue facing many fields without a clear or easy solution. Four recommendations are derived from the present review: (1) performance of additional research on platforms other than Facebook or Twitter; (2) clarification of conceptualizations of misinformation and increased consistency in usage of terms; (3) greater integration of theory for enhancing understanding of how misinformation spreads and how to best correct misinformation once it proliferates on SNSs; and (4) promotion of interdisciplinary collaborations among researches investigating misinformation and SNSs. Directions for future research are also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Appendix.

References

  • Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Yu, C. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics, 6, 2053168019848554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rawi, A. (2019). Gatekeeping fake news discourses on mainstream media versus social media. Social Science Computer Review, 37, 687–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center. Retrieved April 17, 2021, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/

  • Andorfer, A. (2017). Spreading like wildfire: Solutions for abating the fake news problem on social media via technology controls and government regulation notes. Hastings Law Journal, 69, 1409–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y., Faris, R., Roberts, H., & Zuckerman, E. (2017). Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review, 3, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. L. (2007). Civic learning in changing democracies: Challenges for citizenship and civic education. In P. Dahlgren (Ed.), Young citizens (pp. 59–77). New Media Lond. UK Routledge. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Science vs. conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PLOS ONE, 10, e0118093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65, 619–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broniatowski, D. A., Jamison, A. M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., Chen, T., Benton, A., Quinn, S. C., & Dredze, M. (2018). Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health, 108, 1378–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In A. Marwick & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). Sage Londres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Sin, S.-C. J., Theng, Y.-L., & Lee, C. S. (2015). Why students share misinformation on social media: Motivation, gender, and study-level differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41, 583–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, W.-Y. S., Oh, A., & Klein, W. M. P. (2018). Addressing health-related misinformation on social media. JAMA, 320, 2417–2418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, M., & Brenner, J. (2013). The demographics of social media users, 2012. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallis, D. (2009). A conceptual analysis of disinformation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielden, A., Grupač, M., & Adamko, P. (2018). How users validate the information they encounter on digital content platforms: The production and proliferation of fake social media news, the likelihood of consumer exposure, and online deceptions. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 10, 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A., & Tippett, L. H. C. (1928). Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 24, 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giglietto, F., Iannelli, L., Rossi, L., & Valeriani, A. (2016). Fakes, news and the election: A new taxonomy for the study of misleading information within the hybrid media system. Social Science Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Internet & American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraski, R. (2018). Combating fake news in social media: U.S. and German legal approaches. The St. John's Law Review, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger (Ed.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S., Sengupta, S., Butaney, M., et al. (2019). Dissemination of misinformative and biased information about prostate cancer on Youtube. European Urology, 75, 564–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutzke, L., Drummond, C., Slovic, P., & Árvai, J. (2019). Priming critical thinking: Simple interventions limit the influence of fake news about climate change on Facebook. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101964.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay, K., & Milstein, B. (1998). Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. CAM J, 10, 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchi, R. (2012). With Facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity.” Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36, 246–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, T. H., Lee, H., Cesare, N., Shojaie, A., & Spiro, E. S. (2017). Using Twitter for demographic and social science research: Tools for data collection and processing. Sociological Methods & Research, 46, 390–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1961). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 63, 326–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, R. M., & Asch, D. A. (2018). Protecting the value of medical science in the age of social media and “fake news.” JAMA, 320, 2415–2416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahon, K., & Hemsley, J. (2013). Going viral. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbay, F. A., & Alatas, B. (2019). A novel approach for detection of fake news on social media using metaheuristic optimization algorithms. Elektron Ir Elektrotechnika, 25, 62–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2019). Social media fact sheet. Pew Research Center Internet Science & Technology. Retrieved December 31, 2019, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/

  • Rains, S. A., & Brunner, S. R. (2015). What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites. New Media & Society, 17, 114–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A., Basak, K., Ekbal, A., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2018). A deep ensemble framework for fake news detection and classification. ArXiv181104670 Cs

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, C., Hui, P.-M., Wang, L., Jiang, X., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., & Ciampaglia, G. L. (2018). Anatomy of an online misinformation network. PLOS ONE, 13, e0196087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M., Yadav, K., Yadav, N., & Ferdinand, K. C. (2017). Zika virus pandemic—Analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform. American Journal of Infection Control, 45, 301–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, E., & Matsa, K. E. (2018). News use across social media platforms 2018. Pew Research Center's Journal Project. Retrieved December 31, 2019, from https://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/

  • Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Saunders Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L. (2018). Misinformation among mass audiences as a focus for inquiry. In B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson, & L. Sheble (Eds.), Misinformation mass audiences (pp. 1–14). University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H. (2014). Toward a model of meme diffusion (M3D). Communication Theory, 24, 311–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. C. (2019). Leveraging library trust to combat misinformation on social media. Library & Information Science Research, 41, 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Zafar, N., & Alrasheedy, M. (2019). Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. S. L., Lee, C., & Chae, J. (2015). Exposure to health (mis)information: Lagged effects on young adults’ health behaviors and potential pathways. Journal of Communication, 65, 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news.” Digit Journal, 6, 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359, 1146–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 39, 621–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine, 240, 112552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., & Zhuang, J. (2018). Rumor response, debunking response, and decision makings of misinformed Twitter users during disasters. Natural Hazards, 93, 1145–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research International Journal, 16, 362–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lourdes S. Martinez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix—44 Reviewed Articles

Appendix—44 Reviewed Articles

  1. 1.

    Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 211–236.

  2. 2.

    Al-Rawi, A. (2019). Gatekeeping fake news discourses on mainstream media versus social media. Social Science Computer Review, 37, 687–704.

  3. 3.

    Andorfer, A. (2017). Spreading like wildfire: Solutions for abating the fake news problem on social media via technology controls and government regulation notes. Hastings Law Journal, 69, 1409–1432.

  4. 4.

    Arianto, R., Warnars, H. L. H. S., Abdurachman, E., Heryadi, Y., & Gaol, F. L. (2019). The architecture social media and online newspaper credibility measurement for fake news detection. Telkomnika, 17, 738–744.

  5. 5.

    Barfar, A. (2019). Cognitive and affective responses to political disinformation in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 173–179.

  6. 6.

    Bessi, A. (2017). On the statistical properties of viral misinformation in online social media. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 469, 459–470.

  7. 7.

    Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65, 619–638.

  8. 8.

    Borges, P. M., & Gambarato, R. R. (2019). The role of beliefs and behavior on facebook: A semiotic approach to algorithms, fake news, and transmedia journalism.

  9. 9.

    Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2018). The global organization of social media disinformation campaigns. Journal of International Affairs, 71, 23–32.

  10. 10.

    Brummette, J., DiStaso, M., Vafeiadis, M., & Messner, M. (2018). Read all about it: The politicization of “fake news” on Twitter. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 497–517.

  11. 11.

    Chamberlain, P. R. (2010). Twitter as a vector for disinformation. Journal of Information Warfare, 9, 11–17.

  12. 12.

    Chen, X., Sin, S.-C. J., Theng, Y.-L., & Lee, C. S. (2015). Why students share misinformation on social media: Motivation, gender, and study-level differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41, 583–592.

  13. 13.

    Chou, W.-Y. S., Oh, A., & Klein, W. M. P. (2018). Addressing health-related misinformation on social media. JAMA, 320, 2417–2418.

  14. 14.

    Colliander, J. (2019). “This is fake news”: Investigating the role of conformity to other users’ views when commenting on and spreading disinformation in social media. Computers in Human, Behavior, 97, 202–215.

  15. 15.

    Densley, J., Dexter, K., & Eckberg, D. A. (2018). When legend becomes fact, tweet the legend. Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 5, 148–156.

  16. 16.

    Fielden, A., Grupač, M., & Adamko, P. (2018). How users validate the information they encounter on digital content platforms: The production and proliferation of fake social media news, the likelihood of consumer exposure, and online deceptions. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 10, 51–57.

  17. 17.

    Frish, Y., & Greenbaum, D. (2017). Is social media a cesspool of misinformation? Clearing a path for patient-friendly safe spaces online. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17, 19–21.

  18. 18.

    Fung, I. C.-H., Fu, K.-W., Chan, C.-H., Chan, B. S. B., Cheung, C.-N., Abraham, T., & Tse, Z. T. H. (2016). Social media’s initial reaction to information and misinformation on Ebola, August 2014: Facts and Rumors. Public Health Reports, 131, 461–473.

  19. 19.

    Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Fake news and all-too-real emotions: Surveying the social media battlefield. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 25, 85.

  20. 20.

    Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363, 374–378.

  21. 21.

    Guarda, R. F., Ohlson, M. P., & Romanini, A. V. (2018). Disinformation, dystopia and post-reality in social media: A semiotic-cognitive perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 34, 185–197.

  22. 22.

    Ho, A., McGrath, C., & Mattheos, N. (2017). Social media patient testimonials in implant dentistry: Information or misinformation? Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28, 791–800.

  23. 23.

    Jones, M. O. (2019). The Gulf information war| propaganda, fake news, and fake trends: The weaponization of Twitter Bots in the Gulf Crisis. International Journal of Communication, 13, 27.

  24. 24.

    Kim, A., & Dennis, A. R. (2019) Says who? The effects of presentation format and source rating on fake news in social media. MIS Quarterly, 43, 1025–1039.

  25. 25.

    Kraski, R. (2018). Combating fake news in social media: U.S. and German legal approaches. StJohn's Law Review, 91.

  26. 26.

    Loeb, S., Sengupta, S., Butaney, M., et al. (2019). Dissemination of misinformative and biased information about prostate cancer on YouTube. European Urology, 75, 564–567.

  27. 27.

    Lutzke, L., Drummond, C., Slovic, P., & Árvai, J. (2019). Priming critical thinking: Simple interventions limit the influence of fake news about climate change on Facebook. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101964.

  28. 28.

    Marchi, R. (2012). With Facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity.” Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36, 246–262.

  29. 29.

    Merchant, R. M., & Asch, D. A. (2018). Protecting the value of medical science in the age of social media and “fake news.” JAMA, 320, 2415–2416.

  30. 30.

    Nunan, D., & Yenicioglu, B. (2013). Informed, uninformed and participative consent in social media research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 55, 791–808.

  31. 31.

    Ortiz-Martínez, Y., & Jiménez-Arcia, L. F. (2017). Yellow fever outbreaks and Twitter: Rumors and misinformation. American Journal of Infection Control, 45, 816–817.

  32. 32.

    Oyeyemi, S. O., Gabarron, E., & Wynn, R. (2014). Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: A dangerous combination? BMJ, 349, g6178.

  33. 33.

    Ozbay, F. A., & Alatas, B. (2019). A novel approach for detection of fake news on social media using metaheuristic optimization algorithms. Elektron Ir Elektrotechnika, 25, 62–67.

  34. 34.

    Peña, A. M. (2016). Misinformed users: Improving informed decision-making on social media. Transplant International, 29,

  35. 35.

    35. Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2018). The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 278–287.

  36. 36.

    Steffens, M. S., Dunn, A. G., Wiley, K. E., & Leask, J. (2019). How organisations promoting vaccination respond to misinformation on social media: A qualitative investigation. BMC Public Health, 19, 1348.

  37. 37.

    Sullivan, M. C. (2019). Leveraging library trust to combat misinformation on social media. Library & Information Science Research, 41, 2–10.

  38. 38.

    Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Zafar, N., & Alrasheedy, M. (2019). Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 72–82.

  39. 39.

    Trethewey, S. P. (2018). ‘Cough CPR’: Misinformation perpetuated by social media. Resuscitation, 133, e7–e8.

  40. 40.

    Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 39, 621–645.

  41. 41.

    Vraga, E. K., Kim, S. C., & Cook, J. (2019). Testing logic-based and humor-based corrections for science, health, and political misinformation on social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63, 393–414.

  42. 42.

    Wang, B., & Zhuang, J. (2018) Rumor response, debunking response, and decision makings of misinformed Twitter users during disasters. Natural Hazards, 93, 1145–1162.

  43. 43.

    Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine, 240, 112552.

  44. 44.

    Walters, R. M. (2018). How to tell a fake: Fighting back against fake news on the front lines of social media. Texas Review of Law and Politics, 23, 111–180.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martinez, L.S. (2021). Research on Misinformation and Social Networking Sites. In: Nara, A., Tsou, MH. (eds) Empowering Human Dynamics Research with Social Media and Geospatial Data Analytics. Human Dynamics in Smart Cities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83010-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83010-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-83009-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-83010-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics