Abstract
Each market has its own specific nature driving market players and commercial relationships. To understand the market dynamics and rules governing natural gas contracts, the fundamentals of the Turkish natural gas market must be ascertained. Based on this foundation, it is possible to discuss the functioning and rules governing supply contracts, with a specific focus on the main characteristics surrounding import and wholesale contracts. The natural gas market in Turkey started its liberalization in 2001 with the enactment of the Natural Gas Market Law No. 4646. The principles, targets, and methodology put in place by the Law were incompatible with the actual market conditions. A quick review of the 20 years since the entry into effect of the Law and comparison with Turkish electricity market, which started its privatization in the same period, shows the failure to establish a liberal natural gas market in Turkey. The explanations contained in this study will, regrettably, reveal the prevention of legal evolution of natural gas supply agreements due to Turkey’s natural gas dependency on foreign sources and a failure to establish a liberal market due to BOTAŞ’s quasi-monopolistic position in the market.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Published in the Turkish Official Gazette dated 2 May 2001 numbered 24390.
- 2.
Published in the Turkish Official Gazette dated 11 June 2013 numbered 28674.
- 3.
In 2020, with the increased operations under the Turkish Anatolian Gas Pipeline (TANAP) project, Azerbaijan is expected to become Turkey’s leading natural gas supplier. According to the mid-year report issued by the Natural Gas Companies Association of Turkey (Gazbir), as of 30 June 2020, Azerbaijan is the leading supplier with a 24% market share, followed by Russia with 21% (Gazbir, 2020, page 2).
- 4.
In 2019, total natural gas consumption in Turkey was 45,285.50 million Sm3. Total imports were 45,211.47 million Sm3 (Energy Market Regulatory Authority of Turkey (EMRA) (2020), page iii).
- 5.
EMRA (2020), page 8.
- 6.
EMRA (2020), page ii.
- 7.
Published in the Turkish Official Gazette dated 4 February 2011 numbered 27836.
- 8.
Turkish Competition Authority, July (2012), Natural Gas Sector Report, Ankara, page 119–145.
- 9.
Other natural gas importers are Ege Gaz AŞ, Akfel Gaz Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ, Batı Hattı Doğalgaz Ticaret AŞ, Bosphorus Gaz Corporation AŞ, Kibar Enerji AŞ, and Shell Enerji AŞ (EMRA, 2020, page 12).
- 10.
See Nalbant et al. (2020), page 5 and elsewhere.
- 11.
The Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey (TEPAV) (2009), page 65–68.
- 12.
Turkish Competition Authority (2012), page 22.
- 13.
Eroğlu (2010), page 142.
- 14.
Energy Community Secretariat (2015), page 27.
- 15.
Turkish Competition Authority (2012), page 15–21.
- 16.
Rzayeva (2014), page 65–68.
- 17.
EMRA set eligible consumer limit in natural gas market for (2020) as persons consuming at least 75,000 m3 of natural gas.
- 18.
Published in the Turkish Official Gazette dated 7 September 2002 numbered 24869.
- 19.
Ayrancı (2010), page 139 et al.
- 20.
For a similar analysis of electricity supply agreements, see Yavuz (2011), page 93 et al.
- 21.
Malkoçlar is one of the nine natural gas entry points to Turkey’s natural gas grid. The other entry points are Durusu, Gürbulak, Türkgözü, TANAP Seyitgazi, Marmara Ereğlisi LNG terminal, Egegaz LNG terminal, Dörtyol floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) terminal.
- 22.
Published in the Turkish Official Gazette dated 22 April 1926 numbered 353.
- 23.
For more detailed analysis on poor performance in civil law, refer to Aral (2011), page 106–112.
- 24.
Published in the Turkish Official Gazette dated 13 October 2016 numbered 29856.
- 25.
In accordance with the provisions of Decree No. 32, contract price and other payment obligations arising from certain agreements between Turkish residents cannot be denominated in, or indexed to, foreign currency except limited exempted circumstances (such as a movable sale).
- 26.
Published in the Turkish Official Gazette dated 31 March 2017 numbered 30024.
- 27.
Rzayeva (2018), page 9.
- 28.
Published in the Turkish Official Gazette dated 14 February 2011 numbered 27846.
- 29.
Oğuzman et al. (2018), Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler Cilt I, Istanbul, page 172.
- 30.
In accordance with Article 1530-(6) of the TCC, provisions stating that the debtor is not required to pay interest for late payment, or is required to pay a very small amount of interest that can be considered to be grossly unfair, are void.
- 31.
For a similar solution adopted in relation to loan agreements, refer to Kuntalp (2012), page 93–102.
References
Aral, F. (2011). Türk Borçlar Hukukunda Kötü İfa. Ankara.
Ayrancı, H. (2010). Enerji Sözleşmeleri. Ankara.
Energy Community Secretariat (2015, October 1). Energy Governance in Turkey. Report on Compliance with the Energy Community Acquis, Brussels. https://www.energy-community.org/dam/jcr:361337d2-d6c0-424b-b161-56b70ad92d0e/EnC_%20Turkey_compliance_2015.pdf
Energy Market Regulatory Authority of Turkey (EMRA). (2020). Natural Gas 2019 Sectoral Report. Ankara. https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/DownloadDocument?id=Sbf8i4dRZHw=
Eroğlu, M. (2010). Unbundling in the Energy Sector. Ankara. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2736858_code948771.pdf?abstractid=2736858&mirid=1
Gazbir, (2020, January–June, August). Natural gas sector report. Ankara. https://www.gazbir.org.tr/uploads/page/GAZBIR-2020-1-yariyil-rapor.pdf
Kuntalp, E. (2012). Bankalar ve Genel İşlem Koşulları, Türk Hukukunda Genel İşlem Şartları Sempozyumu 8 Nisan 2011. Banka Ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2012, 79–102.
Nalbant, H., Kayalica, M. Ö., Kayakutlu, G., et al. (2020). An analysis of the natural Natural gas pricing in natural Natural gas hubs: An evaluation for Turkey. Energy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-020-00395-8
Oğuzman, M., Kemal Öz, & Turgut, M. (2018). Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler Cilt I. İstanbul.
Rzayeva, G. (2018, January). Gas supply changes in Turkey. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Gas-Supply-Changes-in-Turkey-Insight-24.pdf
Rzayeva, G. (2014, February). Natural gas in the Turkish domestic energy market policies and challenges. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/NG-82.pdf
The Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey (TEPAV) (2009). Türkiye’de Doğalgaz Sektörünün Yeniden Yapılandırılması. Ankara. https://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/1295967350-8.Turkiyede_Dogalgaz_Sektorunun_Yeniden_Yapilandirilmasi.pdf
Turkish Competition Authority (2012, July). Natural gas sector report. Ankara. https://www.rekabet.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2f1%2fDocuments%2fG%c3%bcncel%2fsektorarastirma.pdf
Yavuz, M. (2011). Elektrik Piyasası Kanunu’nun Öngördüğü Hukuki Rejim ile Elektrik Tedarik Sözleşmeleri – Özellikle İkili Anlaşma. İstanbul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kepkep, B. (2021). Regulation of Natural Gas Contracts. In: Eroğlu, M., Finger, M. (eds) The Regulation of Turkish Network Industries. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81720-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81720-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81719-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81720-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)