Abstract
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (2-[18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been used for the diagnosis and management of the malignancy, cardiac, and brain disorders. A significant linear correlation between 2-[18F]FDG uptake and inflammatory cell density was confirmed in both acute and chronic inflammation. These observations explain the superior accuracy of 2-[18F]FDG PET over traditional imaging techniques in the assessment of infection/inflammation. Currently, 2-[18F]FDG PET provides outstanding performance for the diagnosis of several infectious and inflammatory diseases and monitoring of response to therapy. 2-[18F]FDG PET can provide higher resolution images than conventional nuclear medicine examinations. Moreover, 2-[18F]FDG PET has the advantage of completing a whole-body scan in a short time. However, compared to malignancy, evidence for the usefulness of 2-[18F]FDG PET is still weak for assessing infections, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases. This chapter introduces the utility and limitations of 2-[18F]FDG PET for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment in infections, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
7.1 Introduction
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (2-[18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has impacted the staging, restaging, and assessment of the therapeutic effect in a variety of malignancies. However, 2-[18F]FDG uptake is not specific for malignancies, and nonmalignant lesions such as infection, inflammation, granulomatous diseases, and autoimmune diseases with increased glycolysis can be visualized with 2-[18F]FDG PET. Currently, 2-[18F]FDG PET provides outstanding performance for the diagnosis of several infectious and inflammatory diseases and monitoring of response to therapy. This chapter describes the roles and limitations of 2-[18F]FDG PET and 2-[18F]FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) in the field of infectious and inflammatory diseases and adds some valuable knowledge about 2-[18F]FDG PET for the assessment of autoimmune diseases.
7.2 Mechanism of 2-[18F]FDG Uptake in Malignant and Inflammatory Cells
2-[18F]FDG is a glucose analog, which follows the same physiological processes as glucose, being taken up through cell surface glucose transporters and subsequently phosphorylated by the hexokinase enzyme to 2-[18F]FDG-6 phosphate, which is not metabolized further and remains trapped inside the cell. The degree of cellular 2-[18F]FDG uptake is related to the cellular metabolic rate and the number of glucose transporters [1,2,3]. Increased 2-[18F]FDG uptake in tumors is generally due to an increased number of glucose transporters in malignant cells. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT has played an important role in staging, restaging, and evaluation of the therapeutic effect in a variety of malignancies.
Multiple mechanistic similarities in underlying metabolic pathways have been demonstrated between inflammatory and malignant cells [4, 5]. Inflammation can be broadly divided into three phases: (1) early vascular phase, (2) acute cellular phase, and (3) late cellular/healing phases. The earliest phase of inflammation shows tissue hyperemia, enhanced vascular permeability, and release of inflammatory mediators. The increase in tissue perfusion results in greater 2-[18F]FDG delivery to the affected sites [6, 7]. The second stage is that of active cell recruitment, migration, and proliferation at the site of inflammation. In this stage, glycolytic pathways are enhanced through the release of a multitude of cytokines, followed by upregulation of glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) and GLUT-3 and an increase in hexokinase activity [2, 4, 5, 8]. Hypoxia and toll-like-receptor activation are also influential factors that lead to the activation of this process [5]. Finally, in the transition from acute to chronic inflammation, the cellular environment changes from polymorphonuclear leukocytes to macrophages and monocytes along with tissue healing. However, a consistent shift in the balance toward cell glycolysis and away from anabolic pathways persists even during chronic inflammation [9, 10].
Neutrophils and the monocyte/macrophage family are cells involved in infection and inflammation that express high levels of GLUT-1 and GLUT-3 and show increased hexokinase activity. Macrophages, which are regarded as a substantial component of 2-[18F]FDG uptake in tumors, are localized as peri-tumoral inflammatory cells [11]. A high degree of 2-[18F]FDG uptake is seen in neutrophils during the acute phase of inflammation, whereas macrophages and polymorphonuclear leukocytes take up 2-[18F]FDG during the chronic phase. A significant linear correlation between 2-[18F]FDG uptake and inflammatory cells density was confirmed in both acute and chronic inflammation [12]. These observations explain the superior accuracy of 2-[18F]FDG PET over traditional imaging techniques in chronic infection/inflammation.
Two major differences are present in the process of 2-[18F]FDG uptake in tumor cells and inflammatory cells. First, glucose-6-phosphatase levels decrease in tumor cells but remain high in inflammatory cells, leading to washout of 2-[18F]FDG from inflammatory cells. The other is the extremely increased GLUT levels in tumor cells compared to inflammatory cells [13]. However, differentiating a tumor from inflammation has always been a clinical challenge with 2-[18F]FDG PET.
7.3 Tissue Infection
Infection of tissues can progress to an acute or chronic phase due to hematogenous spreading of pathogenic microorganisms or local contamination. Tissue infection usually presents with nonspecific signs and symptoms, such that reaching an accurate diagnosis is difficult. Microorganism isolation with multiple sampling or histology of biopsies and imaging provides suggestive information that may hasten the process of diagnosis. When a 2-[18F]FDG PET scan is conducted for the evaluation of malignancy, tissue infection may show positive 2-[18F]FDG uptake that is generally regarded as a false-positive finding. Obviously, 2-[18F]FDG PET has a limitation for differentiating infection from malignant lesions. In general, the mediastinum, hilar, and cervical areas are among those frequently showing nonspecific 2-[18F]FDG uptake, which can lead to inaccurate staging of malignancy.
Although nuclear medicine imaging has not been the first choice for diagnosis and has some limitations, increasing evidence has shown a role for 2-[18F]FDG PET in infectious diseases. 2-[18F]FDG PET is clinically useful for the detection of occult foci of infection in patients with sepsis of unknown origin and with fever of unknown origin (FUO). This is because underlying infectious and inflammatory disorders, such as osteomyelitis, infected vascular grafts, metastatic infectious disease, vasculitis, sarcoidosis, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), can be identified with 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT, which is superior to conventional clinical imaging modalities [14].
Recent reports have shown the utility of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT for diagnosing, treating, and evaluating inflammatory diseases, strongly suggesting that 2-[18F]FDG would be useful in the diagnosis of FUO. 2-[18F]FDG PET may allow easier detection of lesion sites at an early stage, confirmation of pathological diagnosis with precise biopsy or operation, and identification of the etiological agent, which could lead to timely treatment of the underlying disease [15, 16]. The value of 2-[18F]FDG PET for the diagnosis of FUO is described in more detail in Chap. 8.
Diagnosis of postoperative tissue infection is difficult due to various clinical manifestations. Although 2-[18F]FDG may have the potential to indicate the postoperative focal infection site, persistent 2-[18F]FDG uptake in uninfected surgical incisions has been observed after at least several weeks, suggesting that evaluation of a residual tumor by 2-[18F]FDG PET after surgery is unreliable (Figs. 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3).
7.4 Osteomyelitis
Osteomyelitis is defined as an infection of the bone, can involve any bone, and is caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Inflammatory markers, plain radiograph, and blood culture are commonly used for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, although they are not specific for this condition. The presence of inflammatory cells in osteomyelitis results in increased 2-[18F]FDG uptake [17, 18] and contrasts well with low 2-[18F]FDG uptake in normal cortical bone. For acute limb osteomyelitis, clinical evaluation, serum markers of inflammation, and conventional imaging (plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or three-phase [99mTc]Tc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate scintigraphy) have been sufficient to reach a diagnosis. However, 2-[18F]FDG PET has much higher sensitivity and specificity (more than 90%) for the diagnosis of chronic limb osteomyelitis compared to traditional radionuclide and morphological imaging [19,20,21]. Nonetheless, increased osseous 2-[18F]FDG activity has also been observed in inflammatory arthritis, in acute fractures, with significant metal artifacts, and when assessing the postoperative status (persisting 4–6 weeks after the procedure) [22] (Fig. 7.4).
Spinal osteomyelitis and discitis are usually caused by direct extension into the spine from adjacent foci or by hematogenous spread. MRI is considered the imaging technique of choice in spinal osteomyelitis with an accuracy of 90%, especially for delineating the extent of soft-tissue, epidural, and spinal cord involvement [23]. 2-[18F]FDG PET is useful in these patients as marrow uptake of 2-[18F]FDG is low, leading to a high target-to-background contrast ratio. 2-[18F]FDG PET shows a higher sensitivity (96%) and specificity (91%) for diagnosing and excluding chronic osteomyelitis compared to combined bone and leukocyte scintigraphy (78% and 84%, respectively) and MRI (84% and 60%, respectively) [24] (Figs. 7.5 and 7.6).
Spinal infection often involves the intervertebral disk, vertebral body, or both due to hematogenic spread or a postsurgical origin. The high spatial resolution of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT can usually discern bone and soft tissue involvement [25] and is thus used for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis [26]. In a meta-analysis, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 88% for the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis [27].
For the evaluation of the therapeutic response in patients with osteomyelitis, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT has a huge potential for making clinical decisions regarding initiation or prolongation of antibiotic therapy or recourse to surgical intervention in 52% of patients with infection [28]. Inflammatory changes in MRI scans can be seen long after the disappearance of the infection, and therefore, 2-[18F]FDG PET appears to be superior to MRI [29].
7.5 Cardiac Device Infection and Inflammatory Diseases of the Heart
2-[18F]FDG PET has a huge potential for the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 97% for the diagnosis of pocket infections [30] compared to a lower pooled sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 83% for lead infections [31] (Fig. 7.7).
2-[18F]FDG PET/CT has a sensitivity of 73–100%, specificity of 71–100%, positive predictive value of 67–100%, and negative predictive value of 50–100% for prosthetic valve endocarditis [32]. The application of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT and the Duke criteria increases the sensitivity from 52–70% to 91–97% without compromising specificity [33, 34]. Infective endocarditis is an infection of the endocardial surface of the heart, mainly due to Staphylococcus spp. Transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography have been used for detecting endocardial vegetations with a sensitivity of 40–63% and specificity of 90–100%. Unlike prosthetic valve endocarditis, the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of native valve infective endocarditis is limited, with a sensitivity of 14% [35]. In a meta-analysis, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 61% for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis [36], which is lower than with the modified Duke criteria (80%) advocated in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines [37]. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is a valid diagnostic procedure for visualization of infective cardiac valve vegetation and can contribute to the identification of the primary extracardiac infection source or infective emboli in patients with native valve endocarditis, which leads to appropriate intervention and a reduction in the incidence of relapsed infective endocarditis [38].
Pericarditis is caused by viruses in most cases. Other etiologies include tuberculosis (TB), autoimmune diseases, and malignancy [39]. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT can indicate the existence of active pericarditis. 2-[18F]FDG uptake in TB as an acute infectious disease is higher than in idiopathic pericarditis [40] (Fig. 7.8). Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart muscle and an important cause of acute heart failure, sudden death, and cardiomyopathy. Echocardiogram is the first-line investigation, and cardiac MRI can provide functional and structural information, useful for further investigation of myocarditis. The role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is not specified and is thus not recommended as a diagnostic strategy for myocarditis.
A 2-[18F]FDG PET study should be performed after a dietary preparation with a meal of high fat and low carbohydrates to suppress the physiologic cardiac 2-[18F]FDG uptake. Moreover, 2-[18F]FDG PET should generally be performed at least 3 months after the surgical placement of a device [37].
7.6 Vascular Graft Infection (Vascular Prosthesis Infection)
Although vascular prosthesis infection (VPI) is quite a rare occurrence, it is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality risk [41, 42]. Complications regarding early-onset infection include fever, bacteremia, graft dysfunction, thrombosis, and bleeding [43]. Graft infection as a late complication occurs months to years after the procedure and causes graft erosion and pseudoaneurysm. Therefore, long and close observation and early and accurate diagnosis are crucial for the management of patients with suspected VPI (Fig. 7.9).
Focal, heterogeneous 2-[18F]FDG uptake around the prosthesis is highly suggestive of VPI. Irregular graft boundaries, soft tissue thickening, or peri-graft fluid collections on concomitant CT also suggest VPI [44]. 2-[18F]FDG PET shows high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis (93% sensitivity, 70–91% specificity) of VPI [45]. Several reports showed that image quality assessment using a three-point scale combined with the semiquantitative assessment [46] and a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) cutoff can improve the diagnostic accuracy [47]. Mild to moderate diffuse physiological 2-[18F]FDG uptake has been confirmed in 92% of noninfected vascular prostheses, and this tends to remain in a region of anastomosis [44]. VPI consists of an infected hematoma or a lymphocele around the site of the graft, which leads to decreased specificity of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT for identifying graft infection. Focal or segmental 2-[18F]FDG uptake is more likely to occur with infection than diffuse uptake [45]. 2-[18F]FDG often accumulates in scar tissue and postoperative site, which can result in false-positive interpretation [48].
7.7 Joint Prosthesis Infection
More than a quarter of patients who have undergone a primary hip or knee arthroplasty will eventually develop symptoms of mechanical loosening after a decade of use. Although prosthetic infection is an uncommon complication that occurs in less than 1% of patients after primary hip or knee arthroplasty, distinguishing between prosthetic infection and mechanical loosening is crucial since the prosthetic infection is a major complication for the patient in terms of prognosis and multistep revision surgery. 2-[18F]FDG PET shows significant heterogeneity in the cumulative test performance for infected prostheses, with sensitivity that ranges from 28% to 91% and specificity that ranges from 9% to 97% [36, 49]. The typical 2-[18F]FDG uptake pattern of prosthetic infection for hip implants is the presence of 2-[18F]FDG uptake between the bone and the prosthesis in the mid-shaft portion of the prosthesis; an accuracy of over 90% has been reported with this pattern [50] (Fig. 7.10). On the other hand, nonspecific 2-[18F]FDG uptake around the head and neck of prostheses frequently occurs and can remain for many years [51]. The site of 2-[18F]FDG uptake is essential for establishing an accurate diagnosis and minimizing false-positive results in patients suspected of having prosthetic infection. However, semiquantitative assessment of 2-[18F]FDG uptake in prostheses is not reliable for differentiating septic and aseptic loosening.
The test of choice for diagnosing infected prostheses has remained combined labeled leukocyte/marrow imaging over three decades, with an estimated sensitivity of 92–100%, specificity of 91–100%, and accuracy of 91–95% [52,53,54]. 2-[18F]FDG PET shows almost identical sensitivity as labeled leukocyte/marrow imaging, but the specificity is thought to be insufficient using this modality. Thus, at present, although 2-[18F]FDG PET is a worthwhile preoperative modality, the development of better diagnostic criteria is still required.
7.8 Tuberculosis (TB)
TB can involve any organ by hematogenous and/or lymphatic spread. The most commonly involved site of active TB lesions is the lung parenchyma [55, 56], particularly tuberculoma, which typically manifests as a rather discrete nodule or mass with central caseous necrosis surrounded by a mantle of epithelial cells and collagen with peripheral inflammatory cell infiltration [57]. Due to the large number of activated inflammatory cells with high glycolytic rates, active TB lesions are usually represented as areas of intense 2-[18F]FDG uptake. Therefore, the sensitivity of 2-[18F]FDG PET is very high for identifying active granulomatous foci (Fig. 7.11).
TB lesions do not have any characteristic 2-[18F]FDG PET features but show variable 2-[18F]FDG uptake according to the grade of inflammatory activity [55]. Due to the lack of specificity of 2-[18F]FDG PET for distinguishing granulomatous disease from malignancy, TB should be considered in the differential diagnosis of 2-[18F]FDG-avid thoracic lesions, and biopsy and histopathological examination are still essential for the final diagnosis.
Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infection is caused by a group of opportunistic bacterial pathogens such as Mycobacterium avium intracellular complex that is hard to isolate and is characterized by nonspecific clinical signs. In the same manner as TB, NTM might represent a broad range of radiological patterns, comprising parenchymal consolidation, nodular or pseudo-nodular lesions, cavitary lesions, pleural effusions, pleural thickenings, or a mixed pattern [58,59,60]. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT could reflect the activity and extent of disease by monitoring metabolic activity not only in nodular lesions but also in a broad range of radiologically visible lung lesions in NTM. Despite these uncertainties, an important aspect of PET/CT imaging is its potential role in assessing the extent of disease, its evolution, and follow-up of NTM patients [61].
7.9 Sarcoidosis
Sarcoidosis is regarded as a systemic noncaseating granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. Typical clinical features are bilateral active lymph nodes in the mediastinal and hilar regions. Sarcoidosis also appears as pulmonary lymphoreticular opacities and lesions in the skin, muscle, joints, eyes, and other organs including the myocardium, liver, and spleen [62].
Serum angiotensin converting enzyme is produced by epithelial cells derived from activated macrophages and is a known marker for sarcoidosis that reflects the amount of whole-body granuloma. However, the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) in sarcoidosis is limited due to its poor sensitivity and specificity [63].
Malignant lymphoma and TB are major differential diagnoses of sarcoidosis; therefore, typical clinicoradiological findings with the histopathological hallmark of noncaseating granulomas are required for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is a less-invasive test that can be used to determine targets for tissue sampling and evaluation of the extent of the disease (Fig. 7.12). Compared to gallium-67 scanning, 2-[18F]FDG PET is more sensitive and accurate for detecting pulmonary sarcoidosis, is better for identification of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis, and has higher interobserver agreement [64, 65]. 2-[18F]FDG uptake is correlated with disease activity and the clinical course [66]. 2-[18F]FDG PET is useful for monitoring the treatment response in the early phase, which can be an indication of the success of the management of patients with sarcoidosis [67].
Myocardial involvement of sarcoidosis is reported in approximately 5% of patients and may lead to a life-threatening condition. Although an endomyocardial biopsy has been conducted for the definitive diagnosis, a sampling error may end in a false-negative result. Therefore, a sensitive imaging technique is required for the diagnosis and monitoring of cardiac sarcoidosis. Delayed gadolinium enhancement in cardiac MRI is a hallmark finding of existing lesions and a poor prognostic factor [68, 69]. 2-[18F]FDG PET and cardiac MRI in patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis show a sensitivity comparable to 2-[18F]FDG PET (87.5% versus 75%, respectively) but with lower specificity (38.5% versus 76.9%, respectively) [70]. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT can be implemented in cardiac sarcoidosis patients with a cardiac device unable to undergo MRI.
Focal heterogeneous 2-[18F]FDG uptake in the myocardium indicates active myocardial sarcoidosis (Fig. 7.13). However, myocardial physiological 2-[18F]FDG uptake shows a variable pattern; therefore, special preparation to suppress glucose consumption in the myocardium is required to reduce background physiological myocardial 2-[18F]FDG uptake. During fasting states in aerobic conditions, the human myocardium preferentially utilizes energy derived from free fatty acids. Therefore, focal patchy myocardial uptake reflecting active myocardial sarcoidosis will emerge [71]. A prolonged interval of fasting for more than 12 h (recommended 18 h or more) leads to a decrease in blood glucose and insulin levels and an increase in blood free fatty acid levels, minimizing physiological 2-[18F]FDG uptake in the normal myocardium [8]. As dietary modification prior to 2-[18F]FDG PET, a low-carbohydrate diet of less than 5 g the night before 2-[18F]FDG PET is recommended to reduce blood glucose and insulin levels [72, 73]. An Atkins-style low-carbohydrate diet (less than 3 g) on the day before PET together with overnight fasting effectively suppresses myocardial 2-[18F]FDG uptake compared to overnight fasting alone [74]. False-positive nonhomogeneous 2-[18F]FDG uptake in the myocardium due to poor patient preparation results in a characteristic pattern of 2-[18F]FDG uptake in the basal and lateral walls [75].
7.10 Autoimmune Diseases
7.10.1 Vasculitis
Systemic vasculitis is characterized by inflammation with infiltration of leukocytes into the blood vessels and reactive damage to mural structures. Classification of vasculitis was first advocated in the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC1994) with consensus on names for the most common forms of vasculitides and to construct a specific definition for each type [76]. Due to the emergence of new knowledge about vasculitis, the International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC2012) was advocated to improve the CHCC1994. In CHCC2012, names and definitions of vasculitides were changed, and important categories of vasculitides were newly added [77].
Vasculitis is difficult to diagnose due to the absence of specific symptoms. For the diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis (LVV), CT is useful for detecting wall thickening, calcification, and mural thrombi. CT angiography demonstrates luminal changes (stenosis, occlusion, dilatation, and aneurysm). MRI can provide detailed information about structural vascular abnormalities (aneurysms, stenosis) but does not identify inflammation in structurally normal blood vessels.
Because of the limited spatial resolution of the PET/CT scanner, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT can only visualize LVV, which is defined as a disease mainly affecting the large arteries, with two major variants, Takayasu arteritis (TA) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) (Fig. 7.14). However, the advantage of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is that it can detect areas affected by vasculitis in the early phase prior to structural changes. TA and GCA are different diseases with different ages of onset, ethnic distributions, immunogenic backgrounds [78], and response to therapies [79, 80]. TA mainly affects the aorta and its main branches, namely, the carotid arteries, brachiocephalic trunk, and subclavian arteries. GCA can involve the temporal artery as well as the aorta and its main branches (Fig. 7.15). However, GCA and TA also show some overlap regarding the histopathology of arterial lesions, reflecting shared pathways in tissue inflammation [79, 81].
The sensitivity and specificity of 2-[18F]FDG PET for the diagnosis of TA are 92% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of 2-[18F]FDG PET for the diagnosis of GCA are 77–92% and 89–100%, respectively [80, 82].
GCA is associated with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), an inflammatory disease around the joints that causes pain and stiffness. Typical 2-[18F]FDG image patterns of PMR include uptake in glenohumeral synovia, subacromial-subdeltoid bursa, supraspinatus tendinitis, and biceps synovitis (shoulder); trochanteric/ischial bursa; hip synovia; interspinous regions of the cervical and lumbar vertebrae; or the synovial tissue of the knees [83] (Fig. 7.16). Nearly half of the patients with GCA can present with PMR as a complication, whereas approximately 20% of patients with PMR might develop GCA [84, 85].
Interpretation criteria proposed to assess the vasculitides have a visual 0 to 3 grading scale (0 = no uptake (≤mediastinum); 1 = low-grade uptake (<liver); 2 = intermediate-grade uptake (= liver), 3 = high-grade uptake (>liver)), with grade 2 possibly indicative of and grade 3 considered positive for active LVV [86]. A total vascular score that includes the visual grading scale is another reasonable method that can be used to evaluate not only the activity of vasculitis but also the extent of the disease by summing up the 2-[18F]FDG uptake scores at seven different vascular regions (thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, subclavian arteries, axillary arteries, carotid arteries, iliac arteries, and femoral arteries) [83, 87]. The target-to-background ratio, using the blood pool as a reference, is a possible semiquantitative method for the evaluation of vasculitis [88, 89], whereas SUV itself is not recommended due to the large overlap between patients with vasculitis and normal cases and the low specificity [88, 90].
Although 2-[18F]FDG PET has the potential for monitoring the response to therapy, no definitive result has led to such recommendation. Several reports showed a difference in 2-[18F]FDG uptake between baseline and post-corticosteroid therapy. 2-[18F]FDG uptake is reduced several months after the initiation of therapy, but it has no evidence of utility in further 2-[18F]FDG scans or for prediction of disease relapse [91, 92].
Atherosclerotic vascular uptake is observed with aging and can result in false-positive findings in the evaluation of LVV. Typical 2-[18F]FDG PET finding is uptake in iliofemoral arteries, a feature of atherosclerosis. This should be taken into consideration in the assessment of LVV [93, 94].
Polyarteritis nodosa is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis, which occurs in the medium- and small-sized arteries and causes multiple aneurysms. A recent report shows the utility of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT for the early diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa [95].
Vasculitis is often accompanied by other autoimmune diseases, and therefore, careful observation of whole-body PET imaging should be done to monitor other disease etiologies [96,97,98,99].
7.10.2 Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD)
IBD is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease that occurs in the gastrointestinal tract. Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis are the representative diseases of IBD. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is a highly sensitive method to detect areas of active IBD. A meta-analysis revealed overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 87% for 2-[18F]FDG PET, respectively [100] (Fig. 7.17). Another indication for 2-[18F]FDG PET may be for children, adolescents, and high-risk patients with IBD who appear to have difficulty undergoing an invasive endoscopy. Visual analysis of PET images is most accurate for diagnosis, whereas SUVs of 2-[18F]FDG are not correlated with any indicators of Crohn’s disease activity (C-reactive protein or inflamed segments confirmed with endoscopy) [101].
However, variable physiological 2-[18F]FDG uptake in the bowel, such as uptake at the ileocecal junction, uptake in areas of small bowel peristalsis, and diffuse uptake in the ascending colon [102], might be observed. Therefore, detection of IBD with 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT still has major limitations. The specificity of 2-[18F]FDG PET can be increased by combining 2-[18F]FDG uptake with the anatomical accuracy of CT [100, 103]. The presence of certain features, such as bowel wall thickening, loop separation, mesenteric injection, and fat stranding, on concomitant CT, helps discern physiological from pathological uptake. The addition of intravenous iodinated contrast enhancement can provide more precise information about mural enhancement or increased thickness of the bowel wall [104]. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT shows the potential for treatment monitoring of IBD with steroids or infliximab [105].
7.10.3 IgG4-Related Disease
The IgG4-related disease is characterized by the formation of mass-forming lesions in various organs that consist of lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates and fibrosclerosis [106, 107]. This disease was traditionally thought to consist of disparate clinical entities, such as autoimmune pancreatitis, Mikulicz disease, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. The IgG4-related disease is highly sensitive to corticosteroids. However, it mimics malignancy that may require surgery or chemoradiotherapy, and therefore, accurate diagnosis is crucial for the management of patients. Increased serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G4 was initially thought to be the major diagnostic criterion for IgG4-related disease. Now, clinicians know that elevated IgG4 is not present in all patients with histologically proven IgG4-related disease and that the IgG4 is not specific for this disease. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT can identify the disease distribution and activity in IgG4-related disease and is also useful for determining biopsy sites for pathological diagnosis. PET/CT indicates a larger extent of organ involvement than assumed before imaging in 70% of patients with IgG4-related disease [108] (Fig. 7.18).
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is one of the major IgG4-related diseases and should be distinguished from pancreatic cancer. Compared to pancreatic cancer, AIP tends to show extra-pancreatic lesions and multiple foci of 2-[18F]FDG uptake in the pancreas [51]. Mikulicz disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis are also major IgG4-related diseases. The other reported sites of IgG4-related involvement include the meninges, lacrimal gland, salivary gland, thyroid gland, lung, breast, liver, kidney, prostate, and skin [107].
IgG4-related vasculitis is thought to be categorized as a primary type of vasculitis and a secondary form of vascular involvement characterized by periaortic or periarterial involvement [109]. Macrovascular manifestations of IgG4-related disease have been reported as inflammatory aortic aneurysm [110], coronary periarteritis [111], and periaortitis/arteritis in the setting of retroperitoneal fibrosis [112, 113]. IgG4-related vasculitis can lead to morbidity and mortality in the form of aortic dissection and sudden cardiac death [114]. 2-[18F]FDG uptake is confirmed in the area of IgG4-related soft tissue thickening with active inflammation around arteries such as coronary arteries [115,116,117].
The differential diagnosis of IgG4-related disease is malignant lymphoma, which requires different treatment than IgG4-related disease. IgG4-related lymphadenopathy with atypical lymphoplasmacytic and immunoblastic proliferation shows histological characteristics that are often confused with malignant lymphoma, especially angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, which typically presents with polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia [107, 118]. IgG4-related mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma and IgG4-producing lymphoma in ocular adnexal regions have also been reported [119].
Glucocorticoids have been considered first-line therapy for active, untreated IgG4-related disease [120]. PET/CT is a promising tool not only for the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease but also for monitoring of disease activity. However, hyperglycemia due to diabetes mellitus induced by steroid therapy may influence 2-[18F]FDG uptake, and steroid therapy itself could lead to overestimation of the response (Fig. 7.19).
7.10.4 Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RA is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disorder that mainly affects the joints with synovitis, pannus formation, and cartilage erosion and sometimes affects the skin, eyes, lungs, heart, and blood vessels. 2-[18F]FDG uptake has been confirmed at the sites affected by RA with higher sensitivity early after the onset of clinical symptoms (Fig. 7.20). The degree of 2-[18F]FDG uptake in affected joints reflects disease activity, which correlates with serum blood markers of inflammation (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], C-reactive protein), disease activity score, symptoms such as swelling and tenderness of joints, ultrasonography findings of synovitis and synovial thickening, and power Doppler studies for neovascularization [121,122,123].
Although little evidence exists for the utility of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of therapeutic response, several reports show promising results in predicting the outcome of traditional treatment [124] and treatment with biologicals such as anti-tumor necrosis factor-α [123, 125, 126]. Moreover, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT can predict the outcome earlier than other types of morphological imaging [123, 126]. Due to insufficient evidence and according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendation, 2-[18F]FDG PET is not recommended as an imaging tool for the diagnosis or therapy evaluation in RA [127].
7.10.5 Other Autoimmune Diseases
Limbic encephalitis is mainly caused by a viral infection (typically herpes simplex virus) and an autoimmune response against the limbic system. Autoimmune limbic encephalitis has two types: the paraneoplastic and non-paraneoplastic. The specific feature seen on 2-[18F]FDG PET imaging is hypermetabolism in the temporal and orbitofrontal cortices and hypometabolism in the occipital lobe and bilateral basal ganglia [128, 129].
Multiple sclerosis is thought to be an autoimmune disease that leads to demyelination in the central nervous system. 2-[18F]FDG PET shows hypometabolism at demyelinated sites in the white matter, in addition to changes in glucose metabolism in the cortex [130].
7.11 Immune Deficiency (HIV-Related Disease)
Approximately 36.9 million people worldwide were living with HIV/AIDS in 2017. An estimated 1.8 million individuals worldwide became newly infected with HIV in 2017 [131]. AIDS-related morbidity and mortality have decreased due to advanced treatment options, advances in treatment access, and the establishment of effective prevention strategies, in addition to the low rate of new infections even in high-burden countries. The clinical manifestations of patients with HIV are variable and include a wide range of infections, malignancies, neurological disorders, and lifestyle diseases [132].
2-[18F]FDG uptake in lymph nodes of HIV patients is positively correlated with viral replication and inversely correlated with CD4 counts [133, 134]. This specific 2-[18F]FDG uptake is often misleading in the assessment of HIV-associated malignancies in patients with HIV infection (Fig. 7.21). 2-[18F]FDG PET is useful for distinguishing primary central nervous system lymphoma from opportunistic infections such as toxoplasmosis [135, 136].
In immunosuppressed patients, pulmonary TB occurs in an atypical pattern and increases the risk of extrapulmonary lesions. 2-[18F]FDG PET can be used to evaluate the distribution of TB lesions in the whole body [137, 138]. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT has proven useful for ascertaining the source of infection in HIV-related FUO [139].
7.12 Conclusion
This chapter introduces the impact of 2-[18F]FDG PET for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment in infections, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases. 2-[18F]FDG PET can provide higher resolution images than conventional nuclear medicine examinations. Moreover, 2-[18F]FDG PET has the advantage of completing a whole-body scan in a short time. However, the utility of 2-[18F]FDG PET varies greatly, and the underlying mechanism of each disease still remains to be elucidated. Compared to malignancy, evidence for the usefulness of 2-[18F]FDG PET is still weak for assessing infections, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases. Therefore, further evaluation will be required to determine the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET in these contexts.
References
Bell GI, Burant CF, Takeda J, Gould GW. Structure and function of mammalian facilitative sugar transporters. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(26):19161–4.
Pauwels EK, Ribeiro MJ, Stoot JH, McCready VR, Bourguignon M, Maziere B. FDG accumulation and tumor biology. Nucl Med Biol. 1998;25(4):317–22.
Zhuang H, Alavi A. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging in the detection and monitoring of infection and inflammation. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32(1):47–59. https://doi.org/10.1053/snuc.2002.29278.
Mochizuki T, Tsukamoto E, Kuge Y, Kanegae K, Zhao S, Hikosaka K, et al. FDG uptake and glucose transporter subtype expressions in experimental tumor and inflammation models. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(10):1551–5.
O’Neill LA, Hardie DG. Metabolism of inflammation limited by AMPK and pseudo-starvation. Nature. 2013;493(7432):346–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11862.
Basu S, Kwee TC, Surti S, Akin EA, Yoo D, Alavi A. Fundamentals of PET and PET/CT imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1228:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06077.x.
Ohba K, Sasaki S, Oki Y, Nishizawa S, Matsushita A, Yoshino A, et al. Factors associated with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in benign thyroid nodules. Endocr J. 2013;60(8):985–90.
Vaidyanathan S, Patel CN, Scarsbrook AF, Chowdhury FU. FDG PET/CT in infection and inflammation—current and emerging clinical applications. Clin Radiol. 2015;70(7):787–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2015.03.010.
Bental M, Deutsch C. Metabolic changes in activated T cells: an NMR study of human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Magn Reson Med. 1993;29(3):317–26.
Marjanovic S, Skog S, Heiden T, Tribukait B, Nelson BD. Expression of glycolytic isoenzymes in activated human peripheral lymphocytes: cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry. Exp Cell Res. 1991;193(2):425–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(91)90116-c.
Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, Ishiwata K, Tamahashi N, Ido T. Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography. J Nucl Med. 1992;33(11):1972–80.
Irmler IM, Opfermann T, Gebhardt P, Gajda M, Brauer R, Saluz HP, et al. In vivo molecular imaging of experimental joint inflammation by combined (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(6):R203. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3176.
Rakesh Kumar MRN, Balakrishnan V, Bal C, Malhotra A. FDG-PET imaging in infection and inflammation. Indian J Nucl Med. 2006;21(4):10.
Tseng JR, Chen KY, Lee MH, Huang CT, Wen YH, Yen TC. Potential usefulness of FDG PET/CT in patients with sepsis of unknown origin. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066132.
Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, de Kleijn EM, Mudde AH, Dofferhoff TS, Richter C, et al. A prospective multicenter study on fever of unknown origin: the yield of a structured diagnostic protocol. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007;86(1):26–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e31802fe858.
Besson FL, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Playe M, Noel N, Lambotte O, Goujard C, et al. Contribution of (18)F-FDG PET in the diagnostic assessment of fever of unknown origin (FUO): a stratification-based meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(10):1887–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3377-6.
Guhlmann A, Brecht-Krauss D, Suger G, Glatting G, Kotzerke J, Kinzl L, et al. Chronic osteomyelitis: detection with FDG PET and correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology. 1998;206(3):749–54. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494496.
Sugawara Y, Braun DK, Kison PV, Russo JE, Zasadny KR, Wahl RL. Rapid detection of human infections with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25(9):1238–43.
Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, Corstens FH, Oyen WJ. Imaging of infectious diseases using [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;52(1):17–29.
de Winter F, van de Wiele C, Vogelaers D, de Smet K, Verdonk R, Dierckx RA. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-position emission tomography: a highly accurate imaging modality for the diagnosis of chronic musculoskeletal infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(5):651–60. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200105000-00002.
Hartmann A, Eid K, Dora C, Trentz O, von Schulthess GK, Stumpe KDM. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in trauma patients with suspected chronic osteomyelitis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34(5):704–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0290-4.
El-Haddad G, Zhuang H, Gupta N, Alavi A. Evolving role of positron emission tomography in the management of patients with inflammatory and other benign disorders. Semin Nucl Med. 2004;34(4):313–29.
Palestro CJ. FDG-PET in musculoskeletal infections. Semin Nucl Med. 2013;43(5):367–76. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.04.006.
Termaat MF, Raijmakers PG, Scholten HJ, Bakker FC, Patka P, Haarman HJ. The accuracy of diagnostic imaging for the assessment of chronic osteomyelitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(11):2464–71. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02691.
Stumpe KD, Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Hodler J, Boos N, Von Schulthess GK. FDG positron emission tomography for differentiation of degenerative and infectious endplate abnormalities in the lumbar spine detected on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(5):1151–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791151.
Jamar F, Buscombe J, Chiti A, Christian PE, Delbeke D, Donohoe KJ, et al. EANM/SNMMI guideline for 18F-FDG use in inflammation and infection. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(4):647–58. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.112524.
Prodromou ML, Ziakas PD, Poulou LS, Karsaliakos P, Thanos L, Mylonakis E. FDG PET is a robust tool for the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis: a meta-analysis of diagnostic data. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39(4):330–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000336.
Ito K, Kubota K, Morooka M, Hasuo K, Kuroki H, Mimori A. Clinical impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on the management and diagnosis of infectious spondylitis. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31(8):691–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e32833bb25d.
Gemmel F, Rijk PC, Collins JM, Parlevliet T, Stumpe KD, Palestro CJ. Expanding role of 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose PET and PET/CT in spinal infections. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(4):540–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1251-y.
Sollini M, Raffaella B, Bandera F, Lazzeri E, Erba PA. Detection of device infection using nuclear cardiology imaging. Ann Nucl Cardiol. 2018;4(1):52–9. https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.18-00078.
Mahmood M, Kendi AT, Farid S, Ajmal S, Johnson GB, Baddour LM, et al. Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26(3):958–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1063-0.
Gomes A, Glaudemans A, Touw DJ, van Melle JP, Willems TP, Maass AH, et al. Diagnostic value of imaging in infective endocarditis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):e1–e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30141-4.
Saby L, Laas O, Habib G, Cammilleri S, Mancini J, Tessonnier L, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis: increased valvular 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a novel major criterion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(23):2374–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.092.
Pizzi MN, Roque A, Fernandez-Hidalgo N, Cuellar-Calabria H, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Alujas MT, et al. Improving the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in prosthetic valves and intracardiac devices with 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography angiography: initial results at an infective endocarditis referral center. Circulation. 2015;132(12):1113–26. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015316.
Salomaki SP, Saraste A, Kemppainen J, Bax JJ, Knuuti J, Nuutila P, et al. (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in infective endocarditis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(1):195–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0325-y.
Yan J, Zhang C, Niu Y, Yuan R, Zeng X, Ge X, et al. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infectious endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;54(5):337–42. https://doi.org/10.5414/CP202569.
Habib G, Lancellotti P, Iung B. 2015 ESC guidelines on the management of infective endocarditis: a big step forward for an old disease. Heart. 2016;102(13):992–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308791.
Kestler M, Munoz P, Rodriguez-Creixems M, Rotger A, Jimenez-Requena F, Mari A, et al. Role of (18)F-FDG PET in patients with infectious endocarditis. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(7):1093–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.134981.
Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, Badano L, Baron-Esquivias G, Bogaert J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: the task force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(42):2921–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv318.
Dong A, Dong H, Wang Y, Cheng C, Zuo C, Lu J. (18)F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating acute tuberculous from idiopathic pericarditis: preliminary study. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38(4):e160–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e31827a2537.
Kilic A, Arnaoutakis DJ, Reifsnyder T, Black JH III, Abularrage CJ, Perler BA, et al. Management of infected vascular grafts. Vasc Med. 2016;21(1):53–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X15612574.
Darouiche RO. Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(14):1422–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra035415.
Perera GB, Fujitani RM, Kubaska SM. Aortic graft infection: update on management and treatment options. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;40(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/153857440604000101.
Keidar Z, Pirmisashvili N, Leiderman M, Nitecki S, Israel O. 18F-FDG uptake in noninfected prosthetic vascular grafts: incidence, patterns, and changes over time. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(3):392–5. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.128173.
Fukuchi K, Ishida Y, Higashi M, Tsunekawa T, Ogino H, Minatoya K, et al. Detection of aortic graft infection by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: comparison with computed tomographic findings. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(5):919–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.07.038.
Spacek M, Belohlavek O, Votrubova J, Sebesta P, Stadler P. Diagnostics of “non-acute” vascular prosthesis infection using 18F-FDG PET/CT: our experience with 96 prostheses. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(5):850–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-1002-z.
Tokuda Y, Oshima H, Araki Y, Narita Y, Mutsuga M, Kato K, et al. Detection of thoracic aortic prosthetic graft infection with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(6):1183–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs693.
Cook GJ, Fogelman I, Maisey MN. Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation. Semin Nucl Med. 1996;26(4):308–14.
van der Bruggen W, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Boerman OC, Gotthardt M, Oyen WJ. PET and SPECT in osteomyelitis and prosthetic bone and joint infections: a systematic review. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.08.005.
Manthey N, Reinhard P, Moog F, Knesewitsch P, Hahn K, Tatsch K. The use of [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to differentiate between synovitis, loosening and infection of hip and knee prostheses. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23(7):645–53.
Zhuang H, Chacko TK, Hickeson M, Stevenson K, Feng Q, Ponzo F, et al. Persistent non-specific FDG uptake on PET imaging following hip arthroplasty. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(10):1328–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-002-0886-2.
Love C, Marwin SE, Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine and the infected joint replacement. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39(1):66–78. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.08.007.
Palestro CJ, Kim CK, Swyer AJ, Capozzi JD, Solomon RW, Goldsmith SJ. Total-hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic indium-111-labeled leukocyte activity and complementary technetium-99m-sulfur colloid imaging in suspected infection. J Nucl Med. 1990;31(12):1950–5.
Mulamba L, Ferrant A, Leners N, de Nayer P, Rombouts JJ, Vincent A. Indium-111 leucocyte scanning in the evaluation of painful hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54(5):695–7.
Soussan M, Brillet PY, Mekinian A, Khafagy A, Nicolas P, Vessieres A, et al. Patterns of pulmonary tuberculosis on FDG-PET/CT. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(10):2872–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.002.
Yang CM, Hsu CH, Lee CM, Wang FC. Intense uptake of [F-18]-fluoro-2 deoxy-D-glucose in active pulmonary tuberculosis. Ann Nucl Med. 2003;17(5):407–10.
Goo JM, Im JG, Do KH, Yeo JS, Seo JB, Kim HY, et al. Pulmonary tuberculoma evaluated by means of FDG PET: findings in 10 cases. Radiology. 2000;216(1):117–21. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl19117.
Spiliopoulou I, Foka A, Bounas A, Marangos MN. Mycobacterium kansasii cutaneous infection in a patient with sarcoidosis treated with anti-TNF agents. Acta Clin Belg. 2014;69(3):229–31. https://doi.org/10.1179/0001551214Z.00000000052.
Hollings NP, Wells AU, Wilson R, Hansell DM. Comparative appearances of non-tuberculous mycobacteria species: a CT study. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(9):2211–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-001-1282-1.
Kim JS, Tanaka N, Newell JD, Degroote MA, Fulton K, Huitt G, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection: CT scan findings, genotype, and treatment responsiveness. Chest. 2005;128(6):3863–9. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.6.3863.
Martinez V, Castilla-Lievre MA, Guillet-Caruba C, Grenier G, Fior R, Desarnaud S, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/CT in tuberculosis: an early non-invasive marker of therapeutic response. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(9):1180–5. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.12.0010.
Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein AS. Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2153–65. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra071714.
Studdy PR, Bird R. Serum angiotensin converting enzyme in sarcoidosis—its value in present clinical practice. Ann Clin Biochem. 1989;26(Pt 1):13–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456328902600102.
Prager E, Wehrschuetz M, Bisail B, Woltsche M, Schwarz T, Lanz H, et al. Comparison of 18F-FDG and 67Ga-citrate in sarcoidosis imaging. Nuklearmedizin. 2008;47(1):18–23.
Keijsers RG, Grutters JC, Thomeer M, Du Bois RM, Van Buul MM, Lavalaye J, et al. Imaging the inflammatory activity of sarcoidosis: sensitivity and inter observer agreement of (67)Ga imaging and (18)F-FDG PET. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;55(1):66–71.
Keijsers RG, Verzijlbergen EJ, van den Bosch JM, Zanen P, van de Garde EM, Oyen WJ, et al. 18F-FDG PET as a predictor of pulmonary function in sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2011;28(2):123–9.
Mortensen J, Loft A, Baslund B. 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose PET for monitoring treatment in sarcoidosis. Clin Respir J. 2007;1(2):124–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-699X.2007.00035.x.
Shafee MA, Fukuda K, Wakayama Y, Nakano M, Kondo M, Hasebe Y, et al. Delayed enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a poor prognostic factor in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. J Cardiol. 2012;60(6):448–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.08.002.
Schatka I, Bengel FM. Advanced imaging of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(1):99–106. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.115121.
Teirstein AS, Machac J, Almeida O, Lu P, Padilla ML, Iannuzzi MC. Results of 188 whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in 137 patients with sarcoidosis. Chest. 2007;132(6):1949–53. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-1178.
Ohira H, Tsujino I, Ishimaru S, Oyama N, Takei T, Tsukamoto E, et al. Myocardial imaging with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in sarcoidosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35(5):933–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0650-8.
Ishida Y, Yoshinaga K, Miyagawa M, Moroi M, Kondoh C, Kiso K, et al. Recommendations for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for cardiac sarcoidosis: Japanese Society of Nuclear Cardiology recommendations. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28(4):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-014-0806-0.
Lum DP, Wandell S, Ko J, Coel MN. Reduction of myocardial 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose uptake artifacts in positron emission tomography using dietary carbohydrate restriction. Mol Imaging Biol. 2002;4(3):232–7.
Coulden R, Chung P, Sonnex E, Ibrahim Q, Maguire C, Abele J. Suppression of myocardial 18F-FDG uptake with a preparatory “Atkins-style” low-carbohydrate diet. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(10):2221–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2478-2.
Maurer AH, Burshteyn M, Adler LP, Gaughan JP, Steiner RM. Variable cardiac 18FDG patterns seen in oncologic positron emission tomography computed tomography: importance for differentiating normal physiology from cardiac and paracardiac disease. J Thorac Imaging. 2012;27(4):263–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182176675.
Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Andrassy K, Bacon PA, Churg J, Gross WL, et al. Nomenclature of systemic vasculitides. Proposal of an international consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(2):187–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780370206.
Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, Basu N, Cid MC, Ferrario F, et al. 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.37715.
Carmona FD, Coit P, Saruhan-Direskeneli G, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Cid MC, Solans R, et al. Analysis of the common genetic component of large-vessel vasculitides through a meta-Immunochip strategy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43953. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43953.
Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, Clark TM, Hoffman GS. Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis: a spectrum within the same disease? Medicine (Baltimore). 2009;88(4):221–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e3181af70c1.
Cheng Y, Lv N, Wang Z, Chen B, Dang A. 18-FDG-PET in assessing disease activity in Takayasu arteritis: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(1 Suppl 75):S22–7.
Gravanis MB. Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu aortitis: morphologic, pathogenetic and etiologic factors. Int J Cardiol. 2000;75(Suppl 1):S21–33; discussion S5–6.
Besson FL, Parienti JJ, Bienvenu B, Prior JO, Costo S, Bouvard G, et al. Diagnostic performance of (1)(8)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(9):1764–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1830-0.
Slart R, Writing group; Reviewer group; Members of EANM Cardiovascular; Members of EANM Infection & Inflammation; Members of Committees, SNMMI Cardiovascular; Members of Council, PET Interest Group; Members of ASNC; EANM Committee Coordinator. FDG-PET/CT(A) imaging in large vessel vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica: joint procedural recommendation of the EANM, SNMMI, and the PET Interest Group (PIG), and endorsed by the ASNC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(7):1250–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3973-8.
Blockmans D, Stroobants S, Maes A, Mortelmans L. Positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: evidence for inflammation of the aortic arch. Am J Med. 2000;108(3):246–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00424-6.
Ernst D, Baerlecken NT, Schmidt RE, Witte T. Large vessel vasculitis and spondyloarthritis: coincidence or associated diseases? Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43(3):246–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009742.2013.850737.
Lensen KD, Comans EF, Voskuyl AE, van der Laken CJ, Brouwer E, Zwijnenburg AT, et al. Large-vessel vasculitis: interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:914692. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/914692.
Blockmans D, de Ceuninck L, Vanderschueren S, Knockaert D, Mortelmans L, Bobbaers H. Repetitive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: a prospective study of 35 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(1):131–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21699.
Besson FL, de Boysson H, Parienti JJ, Bouvard G, Bienvenu B, Agostini D. Towards an optimal semiquantitative approach in giant cell arteritis: an (18)F-FDG PET/CT case-control study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(1):155–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2545-1.
Tezuka D, Haraguchi G, Ishihara T, Ohigashi H, Inagaki H, Suzuki J, et al. Role of FDG PET-CT in Takayasu arteritis: sensitive detection of recurrences. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(4):422–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.01.013.
Lehmann P, Buchtala S, Achajew N, Haerle P, Ehrenstein B, Lighvani H, et al. 18F-FDG PET as a diagnostic procedure in large vessel vasculitis-a controlled, blinded re-examination of routine PET scans. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1598-9.
Cimmino MA, Zampogna G, Parodi M. Is FDG-PET useful in the evaluation of steroid-resistant PMR patients? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(6):926–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ken098.
Pipitone N, Versari A, Salvarani C. Role of imaging studies in the diagnosis and follow-up of large-vessel vasculitis: an update. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(4):403–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kem379.
Ben-Haim S, Kupzov E, Tamir A, Israel O. Evaluation of 18F-FDG uptake and arterial wall calcifications using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(11):1816–21.
Dunphy MP, Freiman A, Larson SM, Strauss HW. Association of vascular 18F-FDG uptake with vascular calcification. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(8):1278–84.
Schollhammer R, Schwartz P, Jullie ML, Pham-Ledard A, Mercie P, Fernandez P, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of popliteal vasculitis associated with polyarteritis nodosa. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(8):e385–e7. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000001711.
Demir S, Sag E, Dedeoglu F, Ozen S. Vasculitis in systemic autoinflammatory diseases. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:377. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00377.
Geraldino-Pardilla L, Zartoshti A, Ozbek AB, Giles JT, Weinberg R, Kinkhabwala M, et al. Arterial inflammation detected with (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(1):30–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40345.
Kemna MJ, Bucerius J, Drent M, Voo S, Veenman M, van Paassen P, et al. Aortic (1)(8)F-FDG uptake in patients suffering from granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(9):1423–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3081-y.
Mooij CF, Hermsen R, Hoppenreijs EP, Bleeker-Rovers CP, IJland MM, de Geus-Oei LF. Fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan showing polyarthritis in a patient with an atypical presentation of Henoch-Schonlein vasculitis without clinical signs of arthritis: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2016;10(1):159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0913-8.
Treglia G, Quartuccio N, Sadeghi R, Farchione A, Caldarella C, Bertagna F, et al. Diagnostic performance of Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7(5):345–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2012.08.005.
Neurath MF, Vehling D, Schunk K, Holtmann M, Brockmann H, Helisch A, et al. Noninvasive assessment of Crohn’s disease activity: a comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, hydromagnetic resonance imaging, and granulocyte scintigraphy with labeled antibodies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(8):1978–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05836.x.
Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics. 1999;19(1):61–77; quiz 150-1. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.1.g99ja0761.
Bicik I, Bauerfeind P, Breitbach T, von Schulthess GK, Fried M. Inflammatory bowel disease activity measured by positron-emission tomography. Lancet. 1997;350(9073):262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62225-8.
Groshar D, Bernstine H, Stern D, Sosna J, Eligalashvili M, Gurbuz EG, et al. PET/CT enterography in Crohn disease: correlation of disease activity on CT enterography with 18F-FDG uptake. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(7):1009–14. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.073130.
Meisner RS, Spier BJ, Einarsson S, Roberson EN, Perlman SB, Bianco JA, et al. Pilot study using PET/CT as a novel, noninvasive assessment of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13(8):993–1000. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.20134.
Deshpande V, Zen Y, Chan JK, Yi EE, Sato Y, Yoshino T, et al. Consensus statement on the pathology of IgG4-related disease. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(9):1181–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2012.72.
Nakatani K, Nakamoto Y, Togashi K. Utility of FDG PET/CT in IgG4-related systemic disease. Clin Radiol. 2012;67(4):297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.10.011.
Ozaki Y, Oguchi K, Hamano H, Arakura N, Muraki T, Kiyosawa K, et al. Differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from suspected pancreatic cancer by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(2):144–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-007-2132-y.
Perugino CA, Wallace ZS, Meyersohn N, Oliveira G, Stone JR, Stone JH. Large vessel involvement by IgG4-related disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(28):e3344. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003344.
Kasashima S, Zen Y, Kawashima A, Konishi K, Sasaki H, Endo M, et al. Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm: close relationship to IgG4-related periaortitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(2):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181342f0d.
Matsumoto Y, Kasashima S, Kawashima A, Sasaki H, Endo M, Kawakami K, et al. A case of multiple immunoglobulin G4-related periarteritis: a tumorous lesion of the coronary artery and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(6):975–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2007.10.023.
Zen Y, Kasashima S, Inoue D. Retroperitoneal and aortic manifestations of immunoglobulin G4-related disease. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2012;29(4):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2012.07.003.
Inoue D, Zen Y, Abo H, Gabata T, Demachi H, Yoshikawa J, et al. Immunoglobulin G4-related periaortitis and periarteritis: CT findings in 17 patients. Radiology. 2011;261(2):625–33. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11102250.
Patel NR, Anzalone ML, Buja LM, Elghetany MT. Sudden cardiac death due to coronary artery involvement by IgG4-related disease: a rare, serious complication of a rare disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(6):833–6. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0614-CR.
Yabusaki S, Oyama-Manabe N, Manabe O, Hirata K, Kato F, Miyamoto N, et al. Characteristics of immunoglobulin G4-related aortitis/periaortitis and periarteritis on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography co-registered with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. EJNMMI Res. 2017;7(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-017-0268-1.
Settepani F, Monti L, Antunovic L, Torracca L. IgG4-related aortitis: multimodality imaging approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(3):e289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.040.
Mavrogeni S, Markousis-Mavrogenis G, Kolovou G. IgG4-related cardiovascular disease. The emerging role of cardiovascular imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2017;86:169–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.012.
Sato Y, Kojima M, Takata K, Morito T, Asaoku H, Takeuchi T, et al. Systemic IgG4-related lymphadenopathy: a clinical and pathologic comparison to multicentric Castleman’s disease. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(4):589–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2009.17.
Sato Y, Notohara K, Kojima M, Takata K, Masaki Y, Yoshino T. IgG4-related disease: historical overview and pathology of hematological disorders. Pathol Int. 2010;60(4):247–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02524.x.
Khosroshahi A, Wallace ZS, Crowe JL, Akamizu T, Azumi A, Carruthers MN, et al. International Consensus Guidance Statement on the Management and Treatment of IgG4-Related Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1688–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39132.
Carey K, Saboury B, Basu S, Brothers A, Ogdie A, Werner T, et al. Evolving role of FDG PET imaging in assessing joint disorders: a systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(10):1939–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1863-4.
Kubota K, Ito K, Morooka M, Minamimoto R, Miyata Y, Yamashita H, et al. FDG PET for rheumatoid arthritis: basic considerations and whole-body PET/CT. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1228:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06031.x.
Beckers C, Ribbens C, Andre B, Marcelis S, Kaye O, Mathy L, et al. Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis with (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(6):956–64.
Roivainen A, Hautaniemi S, Mottonen T, Nuutila P, Oikonen V, Parkkola R, et al. Correlation of 18F-FDG PET/CT assessments with disease activity and markers of inflammation in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis following the initiation of combination therapy with triple oral antirheumatic drugs. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(3):403–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2282-x.
Okamura K, Yonemoto Y, Arisaka Y, Takeuchi K, Kobayashi T, Oriuchi N, et al. The assessment of biologic treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using FDG-PET/CT. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(8):1484–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes064.
Elzinga EH, van der Laken CJ, Comans EF, Boellaard R, Hoekstra OS, Dijkmans BA, et al. 18F-FDG PET as a tool to predict the clinical outcome of infliximab treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an explorative study. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(1):77–80. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.076711.
Colebatch AN, Edwards CJ, Ostergaard M, van der Heijde D, Balint PV, D’Agostino MA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(6):804–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203158.
Fisher RE, Patel NR, Lai EC, Schulz PE. Two different 18F-FDG brain PET metabolic patterns in autoimmune limbic encephalitis. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37(9):e213–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e31824852c7.
Rey C, Koric L, Guedj E, Felician O, Kaphan E, Boucraut J, et al. Striatal hypermetabolism in limbic encephalitis. J Neurol. 2012;259(6):1106–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6308-2.
Faria Dde P, Copray S, Buchpiguel C, Dierckx R, de Vries E. PET imaging in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2014;9(4):468–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-014-9544-2.
gov. H. 2019. https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/global-statistics.
Wagner TBS. PET/CT in infection and inflammation. Switzerland: Springer; 2018.
Iyengar S, Chin B, Margolick JB, Sabundayo BP, Schwartz DH. Anatomical loci of HIV-associated immune activation and association with viraemia. Lancet. 2003;362(9388):945–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14363-2.
Sathekge M, Maes A, Kgomo M, Van de Wiele C. Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by lymph nodes of HIV patients is inversely related to CD4 cell count. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31(2):137–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283331114.
Villringer K, Jager H, Dichgans M, Ziegler S, Poppinger J, Herz M, et al. Differential diagnosis of CNS lesions in AIDS patients by FDG-PET. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19(4):532–6.
Hoffman JM, Waskin HA, Schifter T, Hanson MW, Gray L, Rosenfeld S, et al. FDG-PET in differentiating lymphoma from nonmalignant central nervous system lesions in patients with AIDS. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(4):567–75.
Vorster M, Sathekge MM, Bomanji J. Advances in imaging of tuberculosis: the role of (1)(8)F-FDG PET and PET/CT. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014;20(3):287–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000000043.
Ankrah AO, van der Werf TS, de Vries EF, Dierckx RA, Sathekge MM, Glaudemans AW. PET/CT imaging of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin Transl Imaging. 2016;4:131–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-016-0164-0.
Martin C, Castaigne C, Tondeur M, Flamen P, De Wit S. Role and interpretation of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in HIV-infected patients with fever of unknown origin: a prospective study. HIV Med. 2013;14(8):455–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12030.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Minamimoto, R. (2022). 2-[18F]FDG PET Imaging of Infection and Inflammation. In: Harsini, S., Alavi, A., Rezaei, N. (eds) Nuclear Medicine and Immunology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81261-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81261-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81260-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81261-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)