Keywords

1 Introduction

Groundwater is one of the most important natural resources of the earth which is a very essential source for drinking, irrigation, and industrialization purposes. In the absence of good quality sub-surface water and the growing need for water for domestic, agricultural, and industrial uses, groundwater is an attractive source for good quality and replenishment. In the present scenario of urbanisation, industrialisation and population increase, the rate of consumption of groundwater is increasing continuously. So it is important to identify groundwater potential zones and also monitor and conserve these sources. Efficient management of groundwater in these areas is also very important. The occurrence and movement of groundwater in an area is influenced by different parameters such as geology, soil, geomorphology, lineament density, slope, drainage density, land use/land cover, and the interrelationship between these parameters [1]. Artificial recharge systems are engineered systems which impound surface water to infiltrate through soil layers and percolate into the aquifers to augment groundwater resources. In the unsaturated areas, where these cannot be implemented, shafts and trenches can be directly injected through wells to the aquifers. Groundwater potential zones are the zones that mark the availability of groundwater. Identification of groundwater potential zones can benefit in proper development and utilization of both surface water and groundwater resources by eliminating water scarcity. This can enhance agricultural practices and their income. Uneven distribution of groundwater and misuse of water resources in a year often increases the chances of flooding during monsoon. Also significant decrease in water during non-monsoon periods. Appropriate and efficient techniques should be used to find potential sites for drilling of wells and for providing artificial recharge structures. This is to ensure the sustainability of well yields and to overcome the crisis of water table depletion. For efficient and successful studies of groundwater, GIS provides spatial data integration and natural resource management tools [2].

Groundwater quality is one of the major environmental aspects which is to be studied and supervised depending upon its spatial distribution [2]. Due to the lack of effective management, a reduction in quantity and also quality of groundwater can be a problem. The aim of this study is to evaluate groundwater quality in the study area as a case study and the application of spatial distribution by using Geographic Information System (GIS) and geostatistical algorithms. The groundwater quality parameters such as pH, total dissolved solids, total hardness, alkalinity, chloride, nitrate, sulfate, calcium, magnesium, and fluoride, were collected for this. Using the geostatistical (Kriging) method, maps of each parameter were created [3]. This was used to create the groundwater quality index (GWQI) map using the index method. In general, this integrated method is a sufficient assessment tool for environmental spatially distributed parameters.

2 Study Area

Muvattupuzha is located in the east of Kochi in Ernakulam district. Muvattupuzha is the originating point of Muvattupuzhayar. This place is famous for the meeting point of three rivers together namely, Thodupuzhayar, Muvattupuzhayar, and Kaliyar, hence the name Muvattupuzha. The town shares the border with Kottayam district on the south and Idukki on the east. Muvattupuzha Block has an area of 206.07 km2.

3 Objectives and Scope

The objectives of this project are:

  • To generate a groundwater potential zonation map of the selected study area (Muvattupuzha block).

  • Groundwater potential map validation.

  • To propose a suitable artificial recharge method for the areas identified with poor groundwater potential.

The scope of this project includes:

  • Increasing the sustainability of wells.

  • Arresting the declining groundwater level trends.

  • Reducing the reliance on government water supply.

4 Methodology [1, 3,4,5,6]

See Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Methodology flow chart

4.1 Results and Discussions

Slope Map

The slope is the rate of change of elevation and it is considered as the governing factor of superficial water flow, since slope determines the gravity effect on it. The slope is directly proportional to run-off. Groundwater recharge will be less on steep slopes. It is slow in gently undulating plains. Therefore, enough time is available for infiltration. Slope maps were derived from Aster DEM data, which were downloaded from the Earth data, NASA, with 30 m resolution. The study area was masked out from DEM and the slope was derived using the spatial analyst tool in ArcGIS 10.3. From the map generated, most of the region lies under 0–0.42°. So it’s clear that the altitude is much lesser and thus it contains vast flatlands and paddy fields spread around the region. Only a small amount of the region comes under the slopes greater than 15° so that the areas surrounding the Muvattupuzha block are less hilly and highly fertile (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Slope map

Land use/land cover map

Land use refers to man’s activities in the land, numerous uses which are carried out on land, etc. Land cover denotes the natural vegetation, water bodies, rocks, etc. that resulted due to land transformation. Thematic map of land use/land cover was collected from Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environmental Centre (KSREC), Trivandrum. From the map, it is evident that almost all of the region is used for agriculture plantation due to the extremely fertile soil encompassing the region. And only less than 20% of the region is used for built-up spares. less than 10% occupied by deciduous forest. Less than 5% used for industrial purposes (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Land use/land cover map

Geomorphology map

Geomorphological maps portray important geomorphic units, landforms, and underlying geology and aid understanding of the processes, materials/lithology, structures, and geologic controls relating to groundwater occurrence, likewise on groundwater potentials. It is thought about as surface indicators for the identification of subsurface water conditions. Thematic map of geomorphology was obtained from KSREC, Trivandrum. Geomorphology of the region is such that, More than 60% is a plateau region and the rest is the piedmont zone and pediplain region. Less than 5% are residual hills (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Geomorphology map

Drainage density map

Drainage density is an inverse function of permeability. The line density tool of the spatial analyst is used to get a density map from the drainage map. Drainage density map was obtained by using the Line Density tool of ArcGIS 10.3. The Line Density tool calculates the density of linear features in the neighborhood of each output raster cell (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Drainage density map

Soil map

Soil characteristics have a substantial role in the infiltration of water. The rate of infiltration largely depends on the grain size of the soil. Thematic map of soil was obtained from KSREC, Trivandrum. Most of the region has a gravel soil formation. Less than 10% is occupied by clayey soil near the North-Eastern region. Most of the region has a fertile soil formation (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Soil map

Lineament density map

Lineaments represent zones of faulting and fracturing resulting in increased permeability. They are hydro-geologically vital since they act as pathways for groundwater movement. The lineament density of an area can directly reveal the groundwater potential since the presence of lineaments typically denotes a permeable zone. Areas with high lineament density are good for groundwater potential zones. Lineament map was collected from KSREC. Lineament density was then calculated by spatial density analysis in ArcGIS (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Lineament density map

5 Derivation of Normalised Weights of Thematic Layers by AHP Method

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is adopted here for the derivation of normalized weights of thematic layers. The AHP method is preferred for decision-making of a problem consisting of several parameters that can affect the result. The stronger the influence of one factor over other factors, the higher its relative importance. Which gives a larger weight (Tables 1, 2 and 3) [5, 2, 7].

Table 1 Pairwise comparison matrix For AHP [5]
Table 2 Determining the normalised weight for thematic layers [5]
Table 3 Well data

6 Groundwater Quality Data [3, 6]

See Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 Well data
Table 5 Groundwater quality data

7 Spatial Distribution of Chemical Parameters in the Pre-monsoon Stage

See Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Spatial distribution of alkalinity

Fig. 9
figure 9

Spatial distribution of carbonate

Fig. 10
figure 10

Spatial distribution of magnesium

Fig. 11
figure 11

Spatial distribution of nitrate

Fig. 12
figure 12

Spatial distribution of pH

Fig. 13
figure 13

Spatial distribution of sulphate

Fig. 14
figure 14

Spatial distribution of total dissolved solids

Fig. 15
figure 15

Spatial distribution of total hardness

Fig. 16
figure 16

Spatial distribution of fluoride

Fig. 17
figure 17

Spatial distribution of conductivity

Fig. 18
figure 18

Spatial distribution of calcium

Fig. 19
figure 19

Spatial distribution of chloride

Fig. 20
figure 20

Spatial distribution of iron

8 Spatial Distribution of Chemical Parameters in the Post-monsoon Stage

See Figs. 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Spatial distribution of alkalinity

Fig. 22
figure 22

Spatial distribution of calcium

Fig. 23
figure 23

Spatial distribution of fluoride

Fig. 24
figure 24

Spatial distribution of chloride

Fig. 25
figure 25

Spatial distribution of conductivity

Fig. 26
figure 26

Spatial distribution of iron

Fig. 27
figure 27

Spatial distribution of magnesium

Fig. 28
figure 28

Spatial distribution of nitrate

Fig. 29
figure 29

Spatial distribution of pH

Fig. 30
figure 30

Spatial distribution of sulphate

Fig. 31
figure 31

Spatial distribution of total dissolved solids

Fig. 32
figure 32

Spatial distribution of total hardness

9 Groundwater Quality Index

Water Quality Index is one of the most effective tools that can compare water quality parameters with the respective regulatory standards (WHO) and provide a single number that can express overall water quality at a certain location based on several water quality parameters. WQI helps in summarising the water quality into simple terms like good, bad, excellent etc. which are easily understandable by the public. By combining multiple parameters into a single index, a more comprehensive picture of the pollution state is provided. When mapping the index, the areas of high and low water quality can be easily specified. The water quality index is calculated in three steps. First, a weight (wi) was assigned to each of the ten parameters according to its relative importance in the overall quality of water. The weight 5, which is the maximum weight assigned to nitrate, since it is the most affecting component on public human health. A weight of 2 was assigned to magnesium due to its low effect on human health. In the second step, the relative weight (Wi) is computed by:

$$W_{i} = w_{i} + \Sigma _{{i = 1}}^{n} w_{i}$$
Wi:

Relative weight;

wi:

Weight of each parameter;

n:

No. of parameters;

In the 3rd step, a quality rating scale (qi), for each parameter was assigned by dividing its concentration in each water sample by its respective standard (WHO standard). And to express it in percentage, the result was multiplied by 100.

$$q_{{i = \frac{{C_{i} }}{{S_{i}}} \times 100}}$$
qi:

Quality rating scale;

Ci:

Concentration of each pollutant in water sample in mg/L;

Si:

WHO standard concentration;

For computing the WQI, the Si was determined for each parameter. The subindex of ith quality parameter can be determined by:

$$SI_{i} = W_{i} \times q_{i}$$
$$WQI = \sum\limits_{{i = 1}}^{n} {SI_{i} }$$

The computed WQI values are classified into five types as shown in Table 6.

Table 6 Classification ranks

10 Results and Conclusion

10.1 Groundwater Potential Zonation Map

From the different maps studied above we can successfully conclude that GIS and remote sensing can provide a suitable platform for proper analysis of large volumes of data and decision making for the studies of groundwater. This approach has been successfully used and illustrated for the estimation of groundwater potentiality of the Muvattupuzha block, Kerala, India. The use of the weighted overlay method was found to be very convenient in the mapping of groundwater potential zones of the study area (Fig. 33).

Fig. 33
figure 33

Groundwater potential zonation map

10.2 Groundwater Quality Index

Water quality classification based upon WQI value obtained from water quality data (Tables 7 and 8).

Table 7 Water quality index of pre-monsoon
Table 8 Water quality index of post-monsoon

From the table it is clear that water drawn from the wells E95, BW112 and the surrounding areas, that are Perumbavoor and Vazhapilly respectively, are unsuitable for drinking purposes. The water quality Index is greater than 300, which shows that the water cannot be used for drinking purposes. The water quality index of the well GW-22 is in between 200–300, hence the water is of poor quality (Figs. 34 and 35).

Fig. 34
figure 34

Water quality index map of pre-monsoon

Fig. 35
figure 35

Water quality index map of post-monsoon

11 Artificial Recharge Methods

Site characteristics of the study region:

  • The average annual rainfall of of the region varies from minimum of 2779 mm to maximum of 4526 mm.

  • The pH of groundwater lies between 6.5 and 8.5.

  • The region consist of irrigable land.

  • Drainage density varies from 0 to 6.87 km/km2.

The artificial recharge methods which are proposed for the study area based on the site suitability are check dams, contour bunding, rooftop rainwater harvesting and gully plugging. The above methods were selected considering the suitability of the area for recharge in terms of climate, topography, soil, land use characteristics, hydrogeologic set-up, available technical skills, manpower, and management capabilities, and the capacity and willingness of the user community to bear the costs.

Check dams can be constructed across small streams having gentle slopes that are feasible both in hard rock as well as alluvial formation. The site selected for check dam should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or weathered formation to facilitate recharge of stored water within a short span of time. The water stored in these structures is mostly confined to stream courses and the height is normally less than 2 m.

Contour bunds involve a watershed management practice so as to build up soil moisture storages. This technique is generally adopted in areas receiving low rainfall.

Gully plugs are the smallest run-off conservation structures built across small gullies and streams rushing down the hill slopes carrying drainage of tiny catchments during the rainy season. Usually, the barrier is constructed by using local stones, earth and weathered rock, brushwood, and other such local materials.

In Urban areas, the roof top rainwater can be conserved and used for recharge of ground water. This approach requires connecting the outlet pipe from the rooftop to divert the water to either existing wells/tubewells/borewell or specially designed wells. The urban housing complexes or institutional buildings have a large roof area and can be utilising for harvesting roof top rainwater to recharge aquifers in urban areas.

These are the suggestions for artificial recharge methods suitable for the study area on the basis of its characteristics.

The GIS and remote sensing techniques have helped in:

  • Minimising use of cost, time and labour.

  • Integration of eight thematic maps such as drainage density, rainfall, LULC, slope, geology, geomorphology, lineament density, and soil which gives information to local authorities and planners about the areas suitable for groundwater exploration.

  • Generation of groundwater potential map of the area.

  • To extract useful information from satellite images.

Conclusion:

  • Three groundwater prospect zones were identified and classified as low, moderate, and high potential zones.

  • Low potential zones cover 0.28 km2 from the total area, 118.93 km2 is of the moderate potential zone and high potential zones are of 94.45 km2.

  • Moderate groundwater potential zones were found to be more in this region.

  • High potential zones were found to be along the lineaments.

  • The places with a flat topography were identified to have moderate potential zones.