Skip to main content

Online Classes: Lessons Learned During the Pandemic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 269))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1140 Accesses

Abstract

This work frames the factors that influence students' perceptions of online teaching and learning during the global pandemic. We submitted the COLLES Survey to management students and we conducted an exploratory factor analysis to identify the nature of the latent factors underlying students’ perception of online classroom environment. Three main factors explain most of the variability; according to previous studies, we labelled them as (i) Corse design and development, (ii) Instructor’s characteristics and role, and (iii) Learners’ characteristics. Moreover, we found that some differences occur between latent factors patterns between undergraduate and postgraduate classes. Although the existing literature acknowledges that learner characteristics, course design, and instructor role may influence students' perception of the online teaching/learning experience, there are no studies linking them to one or more of these specific factors. Furthermore, there is limited research on the similarities and differences in perceptions of the online teaching/learning experience between undergraduate and graduate students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Artino, A.R., Jr., Stephens, J.M.: Academic motivation and self-regulation: a comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. Internet Higher Educ. 12(3–4), 146–151 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnard, L., Lan, W.Y., To, Y.M., Paton, V.O., Lai, S.L.: Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet Higher Educ. 12(1), 1–6 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berge, Z.L., Mrozowski, S.: Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. Am. J. Dist. Educ. 15(3), 5–19 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollen, K.A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York (1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Caridà, A., Colurcio, M., Russo Spena, T., Kandampully, J.: Service innovation in emerging economies: an inclusive perspective. Sinergie Italian J. Manag. 37(3), 11–38 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Çebi, A., Güyer, T.: Students’ interaction patterns in different online learning activities and their relationship with motivation, self-regulated learning strategy and learning performance. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(5), 3975–3993 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10151-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, M.H., Jonassen, D.: Development of the human interaction dimension of the self-regulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments. Educ. Psychol. 29(1), 117–138 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho, M.H., Kim, B.J.: Students’ self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments. Internet Higher Educ. 17, 69–75 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clayton, J.: Initial findings from the implementation of an online learning environment survey. Int. J. Cyber Soc. Educ. 4(2), 127–138 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., Olden, D., Dresel, M.: Academics’ motivations in professional training courses: effects on learning engagement and learning gains. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 26(1), 7–23 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Decoster, J.: Overview of factor analysis. http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html

  12. Gonçalves, S.P., Sousa, M.J., Pereira, F.S.: Dstance learning perceptions from higher education students—the case of Portugal. Educ. Sci. 10(12), 374 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, W.: Interdependence of roles, role rotation, and sense of community in an online course. Dist. Educ. 38(1), 84–105 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York, USA (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo, Y.C., Walker, A.E., Schroder, K.E., Belland, B.R.: Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet Higher Educ. 20, 35–50 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, F., Sun, T., Westine, C.D.: A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Comput. Educ. 159, 104009 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., Sethi, A.: Advantages, limitations, and recommendations for online learning during the covid-19 pandemic era. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 36, S27–S31 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mullen, G.E., Tallent-Runnels, M.K.: Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors’ demands and support in online and traditional classrooms. Internet Higher Educ. 9(4), 257–266 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patak, A.A., Naim, H.A., Ma’ruf, A., Ghafar, M.N.A.: Design and validation of online learning environment questionnaire. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 6(3), 334–338 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pearson, J., Trinidad, S.: OLES: an instrument for refining the design of e-learning environments. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 21(6), 396–404 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Phirangee, K., Epp, C.D., Hewitt, J.: Exploring the relationships between facilitation methods, students’ sense of community, and their online behaviors. Online Learn. 20(2), 134–154 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Phirangee, K., Malec, A.: Othering in online learning: an examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. Dist. Educ. 38(2), 160–172 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roberts, T.S.: Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education, pp. 1–18. IGI Global, Hershey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ryan, A.M., Patrick, H.: The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. Am. Educ. Res. J. 38(2), 437–460 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schunk, D.H.: Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 7(2), 112–137 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J.: Motivation and Self-regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications, Routledge, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tallent-Runnels, M.K., et al.: Teaching courses online: a review of the research. Rev. Educ. Res. 76(1), 93–135 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tawfik, A.A., Giabbanelli, P.J., Hogan, M., Msilu, F., Gill, A., York, C.S.: Effects of success v failure cases on learner-learner interaction. Comput. Educ. 118, 120–132 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor, P., Maor, D.: Assessing the efficacy of online teaching with the constructivist online learning environment survey. In: 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2–4 February Perth, WA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. UNESCO School closures caused by Coronavirus (COVID-19). https://en.unesco.org/COVID19/educationresponse(2020)

  31. Walker, S.L., Fraser, B.J.: Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: the Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES). Learn. Environ. Res. 8(3), 289–308 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu, X., Chen, B., Avadhanam, R.M., Shui, H., Zhang, R.Z.: Reading and connecting: using social annotation in online classes. Inf. Learn. Sci. 121(5/6), 261–271 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Colurcio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Caridà, A., Colurcio, M., Altimari, A., Melia, M. (2021). Online Classes: Lessons Learned During the Pandemic. In: Nazir, S., Ahram, T.Z., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 269. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80000-0_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics